Phase I study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus irinotecan in combination with bevacizumab as a second-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase I trial is to determine the recommended dose of the TAS-102, irinotecan plus bevacizumab regimen and assess its safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin treatment. METHODS: A 3 + 3 designed dose escalation was performed. Patients were administered TAS-102 (30-35 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-5) and irinotecan (150-165 mg/m2 on day 1) combined with a fixed dose of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg on day 1) every two weeks. The primary endpoint was the determination of the recommended phase II dose. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled: 6 at the Level 1 (TAS-102 30 mg/m2 twice daily, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 plus bevacizumab 5 mg/kg), six at the Level 2 (TAS-102 35 mg/m2 twice daily, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 plus bevacizumab 5 mg/kg), and six at the Level 3 (TAS-102 30 mg/m2 twice daily, irinotecan 165 mg/m2 plus bevacizumab 5 mg/kg). Five dose-limiting toxicities occurred: one observed at Level 1 (thrombocytopenia), two at Level 2 (neutropenia and diarrhea), and two at Level 3 (fatigue and neutropenia). The RP2D was established as TAS-102 30 mg/m2 twice daily and irinotecan 150 mg/m2 plus bevacizumab 5 mg/kg. The most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (33.3%), diarrhea (16.7%), and thrombocytopenia (11.1%). No treatment-related death occurred. Two patients (11.1%) experienced partial responses and 14 (77.8%) had stable disease. CONCLUSION: The regimen of TAS-102, irinotecan, and bevacizumab is tolerable with antitumor activity for metastatic colorectal cancer patients refractory to first-line fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin treatment.

Therapeutic strategies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway in metastatic colorectal cancer.

More than 1.9 million new colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and 935000 deaths were estimated to occur worldwide in 2020, representing about one in ten cancer cases and deaths. Overall, colorectal ranks third in incidence, but second in mortality. More than half of the patients are in advanced stages at diagnosis. Treatment options are complex because of the heterogeneity of the patient population, including different molecular subtypes. Treatments have included conventional fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, etc. In recent years, with the development of genetic testing technology, more and more targeted drugs have been applied to the treatment of CRC, which has further prolonged the survival of metastatic CRC patients.

Navigating through novelties concerning mCRC treatment-the role of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy in mCRC.

Over the course of nearly six decades since the inception of initial trials involving 5-FU in the treatment of mCRC (metastatic colorectal cancer), our progressive comprehension of the pathophysiology, genetics, and surgical techniques related to mCRC has paved the way for the introduction of novel therapeutic modalities. These advancements not only have augmented the overall survival but have also positively impacted the quality of life (QoL) for affected individuals. Despite the remarkable progress made in the last two decades in the development of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and target therapies, mCRC remains an incurable disease, with a 5-year survival rate of 14%. In this comprehensive review, our primary goal is to present an overview of mCRC treatment methods following the latest guidelines provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS). Emphasis has been placed on outlining treatment approaches encompassing chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and surgery's role in managing mCRC. Furthermore, our review delves into prospective avenues for developing new therapies, offering a glimpse into the future of alternative pathways that hold potential for advancing the field.

Improving sustainability of a patient decision aid for systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A qualitative study.

Objective: To improve sustainability of a patient decision aid for systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, we evaluated real-world experiences and identified ways to optimize decision aid content and future implementation. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with patients and medical oncologists addressed two main subjects: user experience and decision aid content. Content analysis was applied. Fifteen experts discussed the results and devised improvements based on experience and literature review. Results: Thirteen users were interviewed. They confirmed the relevance of the decision aid for shared decision making. Areas for improvement of content concerned; 1) outdated and missing information, 2) an imbalance in presentation of treatment benefits and harms, and 3) medical oncologists' expressed preference for a more center-specific or patient individualized decision aid, presenting a selection of the guideline recommended treatment options. Key points for improvement of implementation were better alignment within the care pathway, and clear instruction to users. Conclusion: We identified relevant opportunities for improvement of an existing decision aid and developed an updated version and accompanying implementation strategy accordingly. Innovation: This paper outlines an approach for continued decision aid and implementation strategy development which will add to sustainability. Implementation success of the improved decision aid is currently being studied in a multi-center mixed-methods implementation study.

Cancer histology in metastatic lymph node predicts prognosis in patients with node-positive stage IV colorectal cancer.

Background: Appropriate prognostic indicators are required for patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC). Lymph node metastasis mainly involves four histological types of CRC. Some metastatic lymph nodes (mLNs) showing cribriform carcinoma are associated with distant metastasis in patients with node-positive CRC and are correlated with recurrence and survival in stage III disease. However, the significance of mLN histology in the prognosis of patients with node-positive stage IV disease remains unclear. Methods: We enrolled 449 consecutive patients with CRC who underwent primary tumor resection with lymph node dissection between January 2011 and November 2018. This study included 88 patients with node-positive stage IV CRC and synchronous or metachronous distant metastases. We retrospectively investigated the association between cancer histology in the mLNs based on our classification and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with node-positive stage IV CRC. Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that CSS was better in patients with CRC and all the mLNs showing tubular-type carcinoma. In contrast, patients with at least some mLNs showing poorly differentiated-type carcinoma had poor prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that "all mLNs showing tubular-type carcinoma" was an independent good prognostic factor for CSS in patients with node-positive stage IV CRC. In addition, "at least some mLNs showing poorly differentiated-type carcinoma" was an independent poor prognostic factor for CSS in patients with node-positive stage IV disease. Conclusions: The histological type of the mLN may indicate a better or poor prognosis for patients with stage IV CRC.

Adverse drug events associated with fluorouracil use in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Fluorouracil (5-FU) is widely used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but real-world safety data is limited. Our study aimed to evaluate 5-FU's safety profile in a large mCRC population using the FAERS database. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted disproportionality analyses to identify adverse drug events associated with 5-FU use in mCRC patients from 2004 to 2023. Subgroup analyses, gender difference analyses, and logistic regression were also performed. RESULTS: We identified 1,458 reports with 5-FU as the primary suspected drug, with males accounting for 48.8% of reports. Gastrointestinal disorders were the most common adverse event (864 cases), while pregnancy-related conditions showed the strongest signal intensity (ROR = 2.97). We found 19 preferred terms with positive signals, including ischemic hepatitis (ROR = 59.32), blood iron increased (ROR = 59.32), and stress cardiomyopathy (ROR = 51.94). Males were more susceptible to weight loss and skin toxicity. Most adverse events occurred within the first month of 5-FU administration. CONCLUSION: Our study provides a comprehensive analysis of 5-FU's safety profile in mCRC patients, helping healthcare professionals mitigate risks in clinical practice.

Irinotecan plus raltitrexed as second­line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective study.

The present study evaluated the efficiency, prognostic factors for and the safety of irinotecan combined with raltitrexed (TOMIRI) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Outcome data of patients who received TOMIRI as first-, second- and third- or later-line treatment regimens were assessed to compare the efficacy of this regimen. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated for each group. Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate efficacy. From January 2017 to December 2019, TOMIRI was administered as a first-line treatment in 23 patients, second-line treatment in 164 patients and third- or later-line treatment in 18 patients. Irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) was administered to another 50 patients, who served as the control group. The median PFS was 9, 7 and 6 months and the median OS was 37, 21 and 17 months for first-, second- and third- or later-line treatments, respectively. The ORRs of the included patients were 21.7, 13.4 and 11.1%, respectively, and the DCRs were 91.3, 81.7 and 66.7%, respectively. Compared with FOLFIRI, TOMIRI as a second-line chemotherapy treatment was associated with longer survival of the patients with CRC. Further analysis demonstrated that pathologic tumor-node-metastasis category, carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, treatment cycles, targeted therapy, treatment of local metastases and first-line PFS were prognostic factors for second-line treatment. Among these, the number of treatment cycles was of vital importance. Hepatic dysfunction was the most commonly reported grade 1-2 (55.1%) and grade 3-4 (7.3%) adverse event. Neutropenia (12.2%), thrombocytopenia (10.2%), anemia (27.3%), proteinuria (38.1%) and hematuria (21.0%) were also common grade 1-2 adverse events. In conclusion, TOMIRI may be recommended as an effective and safe second-line treatment for metastatic CRC in the clinic.

Long-Term Survival in a Patient with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Trifluridine/Tipiracil as Late-Line Chemotherapy: A Case Report.

Introduction: Although long-term survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is limited, treatments for third-line and later treatment are now recommended. We describe a patient who achieved long-term survival when they received third-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI). Case Presentation: The woman who was 52 years old at diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the right colon (T3/N0/M1) with metastases to the lung, liver, ovary, and other soft tissues received first-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab) intermittently for approximately 8.5 years with generally stable disease, and second-line FOLFIRI plus radiotherapy. After progression on second-line therapy, the patient initiated treatment with FTD/TPI 35 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day cycle. She received a total of 38 cycles of FTD/TPI over a period of 34 months achieving a partial response, maintained performance status, and improved quality of life. Neutropenia was successfully managed with FTD/TPI dose delays or reductions. Conclusion: This heavily pre-treated patient with mCRC demonstrated impressive long-term survival and maintenance of good quality of life with FTD/TPI treatment.

Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: The majority of studies of regorafenib now were small-sample and single-arm, which potentially limits the strength of evidence. We conduct the study to identify the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in real-world applications. Methods: mCRC patients who underwent regorafenib second line or post-second line treatment with at least one assessable lesion were analyzed. Patients received different doses of regorafenib and different combination regimens. The patients were followed up with laboratory tests and imaging examinations every 3 months to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint of this study was median overall survival (mOS), and the secondary endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), and AEs. Results: A total of 77 patients (45 males and 32 females, aged 58.80±11.65 years) were enrolled in the study. Most primary tumors were located in the rectum (59.74%), and the vast majority of tumors (89.62%) had an adenocarcinoma histological type. The 77 patients had an mOS of 17.8 months, a progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.63 months, an ORR of 6.76%, and a DCR of 55.41%. Patients underwent regorafenib third-line therapy had significantly higher overall survival (OS) than those underwent regorafenib post- third-line treatment (P=0.03). The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was an independent factor affecting the OS of the mCRC patients [hazard ratio (HR) =1.12, P=0.03]. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, discontinued use of regorafenib after progression reduced patients' PFS (HR =3.07, P<0.001; HR =2.78, P=0.007). In terms of the tolerated dose, patients receiving 120 mg regorafenib had the longest OS numbers, but there was no statistical difference. We analyzed the effect of the baseline NLR on the OS of patients receiving regorafenib combined with immunotherapy, and found that the NLR ratio cut-off value was 4.4, and patients with a NLR ratio ≤4.4 benefited significantly in terms of OS (P=0.03). The AEs included 21 (27.27%) cases of hand and foot skin reaction, 15 (19.48%) cases of fatigue, 9 (11.69%) cases of pain, 9 (11.69%) cases of nausea, 9 (11.69%) cases of fever, 9 (11.69%) cases of cough, and so on. Conclusions: Regorafenib is relatively effective and safe as a third-line and posterior treatment of mCRC. Patients underwent regorafenib third-line therapy had longer OS than those underwent regorafenib post- third-line treatment. Moreover, PFS benefits can still be obtained by continuing regorafenib treatment after progression. Grade 1-2 AEs were common, but these were usually tolerated by most patients.

Hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) therapy in combination with targeted delivery of IL-12 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a phase II trial protocol.

Background: Treatment of advanced liver tumors remains challenging. Although immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized treatment for many cancers, responses in colorectal liver metastases and biliary tract cancers remain suboptimal. Investigation into additional immunomodulatory therapies for these cancers is needed. Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine with robust anti-tumor activity, but systemic adverse effects largely terminated therapeutic development of recombinant human IL-12 (rhIL-12). PDS01ADC is a novel human monoclonal antibody (NHS76) conjugated to two IL-12 heterodimers with established safety in phase I trials. The NHS76 antibody specifically targets histone/DNA complexes which are accessible only in regions of cell death and this antibody has been shown to accumulate locally in tumors. Methods: Patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) or unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) will receive synchronization of subcutaneous PDS01ADC with floxuridine delivered via a hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP). The primary outcome measured in this study will be overall response rate as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Secondary outcomes measured in this study will include hepatic and non-hepatic progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety of PDS01ADC combination therapy with HAIP. Discussion: Poor clinical response of these liver tumors to immunotherapy is likely due to various factors, including poor immune infiltrate into the tumor and immunosuppression by the tumor microenvironment. By exploiting the tumor cell death induced by HAIP locoregional therapy in combination with systemic chemotherapy, PDS01ADC is poised to modulate the tumor immune microenvironment to improve outcomes for patients undergoing HAIP therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT05286814 version 2023-10-18); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05286814?term=NCT05286814&rank=1.

Loss-of-function mutation of REV1 (p.R704Q) mediates cetuximab primary resistance by activating autophagy in RAS-wild type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Cetuximab in combination with FOLFIRI/FOLFOX is the standard first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, some patients experience rapid tumor progression after treatment with cetuximab (primary resistance). Our previous research identified a gene mutation, REV1 p.R704Q, which may be a key biomarker for primary cetuximab resistance. This study aimed to study the mechanism of cetuximab resistance caused by REV1 p.R704Q mutation and reveal a novel mechanism to induce cetuximab resistance. Sanger sequencing and multivariate clinical prognostic analysis of 208 patients with mCRC showed that REV1 p.R704Q mutation is an independent risk factor for tumor progression after treatment with cetuximab in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC (Hazard ratio = 2.481, 95 % Confidence interval: 1.389-4.431, P = 0.002). The sensitivity of REV1 p.R704Q mutant cell lines to cetuximab decreased in vitro Cell Counting Kit-8 assay and in vivo subcutaneous tumor model. In vitro, we observed that decreased stability and accelerated degradation of REV1 mutant protein results in REV1 dysfunction, which activated autophagy and mediated cetuximab resistance. These findings suggested that REV1 p.R704Q mutation could predict cetuximab primary resistance in mCRC. REV1 p.R704Q mutation caused decreased stability and degradation of REV1 protein, as well as dysfunction of p.R704Q protein. REV1 p.R704Q mutation activates autophagy and mediates cetuximab resistance; further, inhibition of autophagy could reverse cetuximab resistance.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib versus Other Third-Line Treatments for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Background: Regorafenib, a novel multikinase inhibitor, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as a standard treatment choice for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Nonetheless, its substantial cost places a significant burden on social health resources and patients. However, the cost-effectiveness (CE) of regorafenib compared to other third-line therapies is still undetermined. Objective: This study aims to assess the CE of regorafenib compared to other third-line therapies for the treatment of mCRC. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, as well as nine other databases to identify relevant studies published up to October 2023, focusing on patients with mCRC and examining the cost-effectiveness of regorafenib. Following the screening and extraction of pertinent data, the study quality was assessed using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) checklist. Results: The literature search yielded 751 records, and after applying the inclusion criteria, 13 studies from 7 different countries were included. Of these, 7 studies evaluated the cost-effectiveness of regorafenib compared to trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102), 3 studies compared regorafenib with best supportive care (BSC), and 3 studies compared regorafenib with fruquintinib, serplulimab, and regorafenib dose optimization (ReDo).The quality of the included studies was high with an average QHES scores of 85.62. Regorafenib standard dose proves to be less cost-effective than alternative third-line therapies. Implementing a dose optimization strategy could potentially rectify this disparity and enhance the cost-effectiveness of regorafenib. Conclusion: The use of the standard dose of regorafenib is generally regarded as not cost-effective when compared to other third-line therapies for patients with mCRC. However, implementing a dose-escalation strategy may enhance regorafenib's cost-effectiveness. Consequently, significant price reductions or optimizing the dose of regorafenib are required to achieve cost-effectiveness.

First-line serplulimab in metastatic colorectal cancer: Phase 2 results of a randomized, double-blind, phase 2/3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether or not the addition of immunotherapy to current standard-of-care treatments can improve efficacy in proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/microsatellite-stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the predominant type of mCRC, is unclear. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, phase 2 part of a phase 2/3 trial was conducted at 23 hospitals across China (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04547166). Patients with unresectable metastatic/recurrent colorectal adenocarcinoma and no prior systemic therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive every-3-weeks intravenous serplulimab (300 mg) plus HLX04 (7.5 mg/kg) and XELOX (serplulimab group) or placebo (300 mg) plus bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) and XELOX (placebo group). The primary endpoint was independent radiology review committee (IRRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included other efficacy endpoints and safety. FINDINGS: Between July 16, 2021, and January 20, 2022, 114 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the serplulimab (n = 57) or placebo (n = 57) group. All patients had stage IV CRC, and 95.7% of the patients with available microsatellite instability (MSI) status were MSS. With a median follow-up duration of 17.7 months, median PFS was prolonged in the serplulimab group (17.2 vs. 10.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-1.14). Although the median overall survival (OS) was not reached for either group, a trend of an OS benefit was observed for the serplulimab group (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.41-1.45). 36 (65.5%) and 32 (56.1%) patients in the serplulimab and placebo groups had grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Serplulimab plus HLX04 and XELOX exhibits promising efficacy and is safe and tolerable in patients with treatment-naive mCRC. FUNDING: This work was funded by Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc.

Immunotherapy-induced colitis in metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) presents significant mortality risks, underscoring the urgency of timely diagnosis and intervention. Advanced stages of CRC are managed through chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. Immunotherapy, while effective in bolstering the immune system against cancer cells, often carries toxic side effects, including colitis. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of colitis in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) undergoing various immunotherapy treatments. Through a systematic search of Google Scholar and PubMed databases from inception until November 2023, nine relevant studies were identified. Subgroup analyses revealed a higher incidence of colitis, particularly in patients treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated molecule-4 (anti-CTLA-4) and combination therapies compared to monotherapy with programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand receptor-1 (PDL-1) inhibitors. Notably, naive-treated metastatic CRC patients exhibited elevated colitis incidences compared to those previously treated. In conclusion, anti-CTLA-4 and combination therapies, such as nivolumab plus ipilimumab, were associated with increased colitis occurrences in metastatic CRC patients, highlighting the need for vigilant monitoring and management strategies, especially in immunotherapy-naive individuals.

Computer-aided molecular design and optimization of potent inhibitors disrupting APC‒Asef interaction.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. At initial diagnosis, approximately 20% of patients are diagnosed with metastatic CRC (mCRC). Although the APC‒Asef interaction is a well-established target for mCRC therapy, the discovery and development of effective and safe drugs for mCRC patients remains an urgent and challenging endeavor. In this study, we identified a novel structural scaffold based on MAI inhibitors, the first-in-class APC‒Asef inhibitors we reported previously. ONIOM model-driven optimizations of the N-terminal cap and experimental evaluations of inhibitory activity were performed, and 24-fold greater potency was obtained with the best inhibitor compared to the parental compound. In addition, the cocrystal structure validated that the two-layer π‒π stacking interactions were essential for inhibitor stabilization in the bound state. Furthermore, in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that novel inhibitors suppressed lung metastasis in CRC by disrupting the APC‒Asef interaction. These results provide an intrinsic structural basis to further explore drug-like molecules for APC‒Asef-mediated CRC therapy.

Prospective, Observational Study of Aflibercept Use in Combination with FOLFIRI in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Effectiveness Study.

BACKGROUND: This was an observational study prospectively evaluating the effectiveness and safety of aflibercept/FOLFIRI administered in second-line mCRC per the reimbursement criteria in Poland. METHODS: Consecutive mCRC patients who progressed with first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy received aflibercept (4 mg/kg IV) followed by FOLFIRI every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS) and safety were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were treated at 17 Polish sites. A median of 10 cycles was administered. Over a median treatment duration of 5.3 months, median PFS and median OS were 8.4 months [95% CI, 6.9-9.9] and 27.0 months [95% CI, 23.9-30.1], respectively. There was no significant impact of primary tumor location, metastatic site, or KRAS status on PFS and OS. Main grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (16%), hypertension (8%), diarrhea (4%), and stomatitis (4%). CONCLUSIONS: The benefits/risks of Aflibercept plus FOLFIRI administered per the Polish reimbursement criteria in second-line treatment of mCRC after failure of a prior oxaliplatin-based regimen is confirmed.

Survival Analysis of Metastatic Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Compared to Metastatic Average-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A SEER Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) is defined as colorectal cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years, and its incidence has been increasing over the last decade, now accounting for 10% of all new CRC diagnoses. Average-onset colorectal cancer (AO-CRC) has shown a steady decline in its incidence and related mortality over the past 20 years. The disparities in outcomes and overall survival (OS) between EO-CRC and AO-CRC are controversial. Our study compared OS and cause-specific survival (CSS) between metastatic EO-CRC (mEO-CRC) and metastatic AO-CRC (mAO-CRC) and identified the associated factors. METHODS: Data on patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, incidence, and mortality were obtained from the SEER database from 2010 to 2020. We identified 23,278 individuals aged > 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of all histological subtypes of metastatic CRC (M1 on TNM stage) using ICD-O-3 site codes. mEO-CRC and mAO-CRC were compared. OS distributions and CCS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to assess differences. A Cox regression model was used to assess the associations between variables. RESULTS: mEO-CRC constituted 17.79% of the cases, whereas 82.21% had mAO-CRC. Most patients with mEO-CRC were 45-49 years old (47.66%), male (52.16%) and White (72.57%) and had adenocarcinoma histology (87.30%). Left colon tumors were most prevalent in both groups (40.26%) but were more prevalent in mEO-CRC patients than in mAO-CRC patients (49.63% vs. 38.23%, p < 0.001). Patients with mEO-CRC had higher OS (p < 0.001) and CSS (p < 0.001) than those with mAO-CRC. Patients with mEO-CRC also had significantly better median overall survival (30 months vs. 18 months, p < 0.001). The factors associated with worse OS included mAO-CRC (p < 0.001), mucinous adenocarcinoma (p < 0.001), male sex (p = 0.003), and a lack of surgical intervention (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with mEO-CRC fall within the range of 45 to 49 years of age. Patients with mEO-CRC were more likely to receive cancer-directed therapy (including chemotherapy and radiotherapy) and had better OS and CSS than those with mAO-CRC. This is likely attributable to the better performance status, fewer comorbidities, and better tolerance to cancer-directed therapy in mEO-CRC patients. The factors associated with worse OS and CSS were age > 50 years, mucinous adenocarcinoma, male sex, and no surgical treatment.

Upfront resection versus no resection of the primary tumor in patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomized phase III CAIRO4 study conducted by the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group and the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group.

BACKGROUND: Upfront primary tumor resection (PTR) has been associated with longer overall survival (OS) in patients with synchronous unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in retrospective analyses. The aim of the CAIRO4 study was to investigate whether the addition of upfront PTR to systemic therapy resulted in a survival benefit in patients with synchronous mCRC without severe symptoms of their primary tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized phase III trial was conducted in 45 hospitals in The Netherlands and Denmark. Eligibility criteria included previously untreated mCRC, unresectable metastases, and no severe symptoms of the primary tumor. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to upfront PTR followed by systemic therapy or systemic therapy without upfront PTR. Systemic therapy consisted of first-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab in both arms. Primary endpoint was OS in the intention-to-treat population. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01606098. RESULTS: Between August 2012 and February 2021, 206 patients were randomized. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 204 patients were included (n = 103 without upfront PTR, n = 101 with upfront PTR) of whom 116 were men (57%) with median age of 65 years (interquartile range 59-71 years). Median follow-up was 69.4 months. Median OS in the arm without upfront PTR was 18.3 months (95% confidence interval 16.0-22.2 months) compared with 20.1 months (95% confidence interval 17.0-25.1 months) in the upfront PTR arm (P = 0.32). The number of grade 3-4 events was 71 (72%) in the arm without upfront PTR and 61 (65%) in the upfront PTR arm (P = 0.33). Three deaths (3%) possibly related to treatment were reported in the arm without upfront PTR and four (4%) in the upfront PTR arm. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of upfront PTR to palliative systemic therapy in patients with synchronous mCRC without severe symptoms of the primary tumor does not result in a survival benefit. This practice should no longer be considered standard of care.

Organ-specific tumor dynamics predict survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: We aim to compare the prognostic value of organ-specific dynamics with the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) dynamics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: All datasets are accessible in Project Data Sphere, an open-access platform. The tumor growth inhibition models developed based on organ-level SLD and SLD were used to estimate the organ-specific tumor growth rates (KGs) and SLD KG. The early tumor shrinkage (ETS) from baseline to the first measurement after treatment was also evaluated. The relationship between organ-specific dynamics, SLD dynamics, and survival outcomes (overall survival, OS; progression-free survival, PFS) was quantified using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. RESULTS: This study included 3687 patients from 6 phase III mCRC trials. The liver emerged as the most frequent metastatic site (2901, 78.7 %), with variable KGs across different organs in individual patients (liver 0.0243 > lung 0.0202 > lymph node 0.0127 > other 0.0118 [week-1]). Notably, the dynamics for different organs did not equally contribute to predicting survival outcomes. In liver metastasis cases, liver KG proved to be a superior prognostic indicator for OS and surpasses the predictive performance of SLD, (C-index, liver KG 0.610 vs SLD KG 0.606). A similar result can be found for PFS. Moreover, liver ETS also outperforms SLD ETS in predicting survival. Cox regression analysis confirmed liver KG is the most significant variable in survival prediction. CONCLUSIONS: In mCRC patients with liver metastasis, liver dynamics is the primary prognostic indicator for both PFS and OS. In future drug development for mCRC, greater emphasis should be directed towards understanding the dynamics of liver metastasis development.