Speed and Cumulative Responses According to Body Regions in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis Treated with Ixekizumab (Interleukin-17A Antagonist) versus Guselkumab (Interleukin-23p19 Inhibitor).

INTRODUCTION: When assessing the effect of a therapy for psoriasis (PsO), it is important to consider speed of response and cumulative response. However, responses among biologics may differ by body regions. This post hoc analysis compares speed of response and cumulative response for ixekizumab (IXE), an interleukin-17A antagonist, and guselkumab (GUS), an interleukin-23p19 inhibitor, in different body regions of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque PsO participating in the IXORA-R study, up to week 24. METHODS: The IXORA-R design has been previously described. Patients received the respective on-label dosing of IXE or GUS. The median time to first Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50, 75, 90, and 100 response (50%, 75%, 90%, and 100% improvement from baseline, respectively) and the cumulative days with clear skin for PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 responses were assessed in four body regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. RESULTS: A total of 1027 patients were enrolled and received IXE (N = 520) or GUS (N = 507). Median time to first PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 response was shortest in the head region, followed by the remaining body regions in both IXE and GUS cohorts. In each body region, IXE was significantly faster than GUS (p < 0.001) in achieving PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100. Through 24 weeks, the number of days with clear skin for PASI 90 and 100 was greater in the head region, followed by trunk, upper extremities, and lastly lower extremities in both IXE and GUS cohorts. In each body region, through 24 weeks, patients on IXE experienced a significantly higher number of days with clear skin for PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100 than patients on GUS (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: As compared to GUS, IXE provided a faster skin clearance and more days with clear skin in all body regions of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque PsO through 24 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ : NCT03573323 (IXORA-R).

Psoriasis, a long-term, inflammatory skin disease, impacts patient's lives, and response to treatment varies depending on the body region affected. Here, we assessed the speed of response and cumulative response through 24 weeks in different body regions (head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities) of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with currently approved therapies: ixekizumab (IXE), an interleukin-17A antagonist, or guselkumab (GUS), an interleukin-23p19 inhibitor. We calculated the speed of response as the number of weeks to achieve first skin clearance, based on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) tool, and the cumulative response as the number of days with clear skin throughout the 24-week period. We found that the head region achieved skin clearance fastest and had a higher number of days with clear skin compared to the trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities, in both groups of patients treated with IXE or GUS. Compared to GUS, IXE provided faster skin clearance and a higher number of days with clear skin in all body regions. For example, the head region of patients treated with IXE, as compared to GUS, achieved complete skin clearance twofold faster and experienced 18.7% more days of complete skin clearance. In conclusion, treatment with IXE through 24 weeks provided a faster response and a higher cumulative response than treatment with GUS in all four body regions of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Optimization of secukinumab dose regimens in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis via exposure-response modeling.

BACKGROUND: Further dose optimization is required for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who do not benefit from the approved secukinumab dose regimen. This study aimed to develop an exposure-response model for secukinumab to recommend dose regimens for patients of different body weights. METHODS: We searched the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials using PASI 75 and PASI 90 response rates as primary outcomes. A model-based meta-analysis was developed to quantitatively analyze the distribution of six secukinumab dose regimens in patients weighing 50-120 kg. RESULTS: Sixteen trials involving 6,197 subjects were included in the analysis. The established model accurately described the time-course characteristics of PASI 75 and PASI 90 response rates over 52 weeks. Simulations indicated that maintenance doses could be reduced to 150 mg every 4 weeks and to 150 mg every 3 weeks for patients weighing 50 and 60 kg, respectively. In contrast, maintenance doses of 300 mg every 3 weeks should be selected for patients weighing 120 kg. Patients weighing 70-110 kg remained on approved maintenance doses of 300 mg every 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Based on patient body weights, the exposure-response model recommends efficacious and economical dose regimens for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Estimate of the cost per responder for treatment with biological therapies of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Colombia for first-year and maintenance periods.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease manifesting as erythematous and desquamative dermatoses. OBJECTIVES: This study estimated the cost per responder (CPR) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with biologic therapies approved by the Colombian regulatory agency. METHODS: This secondary study used a modeling based CPR estimation to evaluate psoriasis therapies in Colombia. We calculated CPR of achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores of 75, 90, and 100 for biological treatments based on the number needed to treat (NNT), reported in previously published network meta-analyses. We calculated CPR for the first year and for the maintenance period. We ranked alternatives using the estimated CPR from each literature source using the Borda count method. RESULTS: Adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept were the least expensive alternatives. Ixekizumab, guselkumab and secukinumab were the treatments with the lowest NNT for PASI 75, 90, and 100. For both first year and maintenance periods, adalimumab, infliximab, guselkumab and ixekizumab had the lowest CPR. Sensitivity analyzes showed consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: The application of CPR analysis of biologics to treat plaque psoriasis demonstrated that adalimumab, infliximab, guselkumab, and ixekizumab had the lowest CPR in the first year of treatment and during the maintenance period.

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of AK111, an IL-17A monoclonal antibody, in subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

AK111 is an innovative IL-17A antibody, presenting high affinity to IL-17A and showing similar pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics to those of typical immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 antibodies. To optimize the dosage regimen for phase 2/3 clinical trials, PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) of AK111 were first characterized in Chinese moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis patients in a phase 1b study. AK111 PK serum sample and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score data were collected from 48 moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients in this study. Non-linear mixed-effects modeling was used for the population PK/PD analysis. A one-compartment model with a first-order absorption and a first-order elimination best described the PK behavior of AK111. The apparent systemic clearance was 0.182 L/day, and the central volume was 6.65 L. The exposure-response relationship was characterized using an indirect response model. The pharmacological effect of AK111 was described in the form of inhibiting the formation of psoriatic plaque, whereas placebo was quantified in the form of promoting the degradation of psoriatic skin lesions. The maximum effect of drug effect (Imax) and placebo effect (PLBmax) was 1 and 0.429, respectively. The rate constant for psoriatic plaque production (Kin) was 0.474 PASI/day and psoriatic plaque loss (Kout) was 0.024 day-1. The body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis was identified as a significant covariate on K o u t . The simulation results confirmed that all of the predicted PASI90 response rates at week 12 were higher than 60% at 150 and 300 mg dose levels with different regimens and could reach higher than 80% at week 24. We hope this first PK/PD study of AK111 in Chinese moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis patients will be of help in the further clinical development of AK111 and provide a reference to the dosage optimization for similar antibodies with a long half-life.

Long-Term Benefit-Risk Profiles of Treatments for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The long-term benefit-risk profiles of licensed and investigational treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have not been fully characterized. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of licensed and investigational treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were identified through a systematic literature review through 2 May 2021. Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs) were conducted to compare the efficacy (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] 75/90/100 [at least a 75/90/100% reduction in PASI score from baseline] response) and safety outcomes (any adverse event [AE], any serious AE [SAE], and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation) of each treatment evaluated between weeks 48 and 56 after baseline. Surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) were calculated to evaluate the relative ranking of treatments. The benefit-risk profiles of treatments were assessed by bidimensional plots of the NMA-estimated efficacy and safety outcomes. RESULTS: In the efficacy NMA (N = 14 RCTs), the relative rankings for PASI 75/90/100 responses by weeks 48-56 were the highest for risankizumab (SUCRA: 98.5%) and bimekizumab (83.8% for dosing every 4 weeks [Q4W], 72.7% for dosing Q4W then every 8 weeks). The PASI response rates did not differ significantly between risankizumab and the two bimekizumab regimens. Additionally, risankizumab was associated with significantly higher PASI response rates than brodalumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, ustekinumab, adalimumab, and etanercept. In the safety NMAs (N = 8 RCTs), risankizumab had the highest relative rankings for all three outcomes (SUCRA: 92.1%, 82.0%, and 91.0% for any AE, any SAE, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, respectively). Risankizumab had a significantly lower rate of any AE than bimekizumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab. CONCLUSIONS: Risankizumab was associated with the most favorable long-term benefit-risk profile for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Although ixekizumab and bimekizumab had favorable efficacy profiles, both treatments had lower rankings for safety outcomes.

Effectiveness of cyclosporine A in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in a real-life clinical setting in Italy: the TRANSITION study.

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine A (CsA) is one of the systemic therapeutic options for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, based on its efficacy and rapidity of action. The current study investigated the response to CsA in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TRANSITION was an observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study which evaluated the proportion of partial- and suboptimal-responders among patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with continuous CsA for ≥12 weeks. Patients demonstrating a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response of ≥90, ≥75 and <90, ≥50 and <75 and <50 were defined as responders, suboptimal-responders, partial-responders, and non-responders, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients (mean age, 46.6 years; 62.8% males) from 14 sites in Italy were evaluated. At the study visit, the mean (SD) PASI score was 4.2(5.5) compared with 15.3(7.1) prior to the last CsA cycle. For response categories, 39.8%, 22.4%, 16.8%, and 20.9% of patients were responders, suboptimal-responders, partial-responders, and non-responders to CsA treatment. Overall, 28.6% of patients permanently discontinued treatment with CsA (lack of efficacy [10.2%], poor tolerability and voluntary discontinuation [3.6% each], and other [11.7%]). CONCLUSION: Patients were only partially satisfied with CsA treatment, reporting measurable impact on quality of life. Only 40% patients showed a satisfactory response to CsA.

A phase 3 open-label, randomized multicenter study to evaluate efficacy and safety of secukinumab in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: 24-week results.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis affects 0.13%-2.1% of children and adolescents. Despite a high unmet need, the current treatment options approved for pediatric psoriasis are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 secukinumab dosage regimens (low dose: 75/75/150 mg; high dose: 75/150/300 mg) stratified and randomized by weight (<25 kg, 25 to <50 kg, ≥50 kg) and disease severity (moderate, severe) in pediatric patients aged 6-<18 years with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: This is a phase 3, open-label, randomized, multicenter study (NCT03668613). RESULTS: Both secukinumab doses were superior to historical placebo with respect to psoriasis area and severity index (PASI)-75/90 and investigator global assessment 0/1 responses at week 12. The estimated probability of a positive treatment effect (ie, log odds ratio > 0) for low- or high-dose secukinumab compared to historical placebo is 1 (ie, 100%). For the low and high doses at week 12, the investigator global assessment 0/1 response rates were 78.6% and 83.3%, respectively, and the PASI-90 response rates were 69% and 76.2%, respectively. The PASI-75 response rate was 92.9% for both the doses. LIMITATIONS: This is an open-label study design without a control arm. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab dosing regimens were efficacious and well tolerated in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Real-world, long-term treatment patterns of commonly used biologics in Canadian patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

Real-world and long-term data on biologic treatment changes - including switching, discontinuation, dose escalation, and interval change (both increasing and decreasing) - are required to understand treatment patterns for psoriasis (PsO) in Canada. The study objectives were to evaluate the time to first biologic treatment change and to document these changes in Canadian patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque PsO. Charts from 13 Canadian sites were queried retrospectively (2005-2019); a period covering all biologic classes commonly used for PsO in Canada. Included were patients diagnosed with, and currently using biologics for, moderate-to-severe chronic plaque PsO. Time to first treatment change, nature of treatment change, number of lines of treatment, proportion of patients on each drug, and drug survival were collected. Based on 1149 medical charts, adalimumab had the longest time to first treatment change (49.3 months; 95% confidence interval, 37.4-67.4). Approximately half of the patients had a treatment change, and nearly 75% of these changes were either an interval change or a biologic switch. Lack of efficacy was the most prevalent primary reason for biologic switch (67.3%), whereas 6.7% of patients switched due to adverse events. Drug survival for etanercept and infliximab was approximately twice as long for patients who had dose optimization (i.e., dose escalation or interval change) than patients without dose optimization. The survival curve of adalimumab was similar to the one of ustekinumab after 48 months of treatment, showing approximately 60% of patients remaining on treatment after 132 months, with or without dose optimization. Assessing treatment patterns of all commonly used biologics for moderate-to-severe chronic plaque PsO in Canada between 2005 and 2019 showed that approximately half of the patients required a treatment change (mainly interval change or biologic switch) while the other half remained on treatment.

Biological agents in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis / 中华皮肤科杂志

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated chronic recurrent inflammatory disease, and biological agents targeting cytokines and their receptors involved in its pathogenesis have become an increasingly important option for its treatment in recent years. With the successive appearance of biological agents such as secukinumab and ustekinumab on the market in China, the use of biologics will become increasingly common in the treatment of psoriasis. This review summarizes the efficacy of different biological agents and individualized drug selection in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, with a view to providing a reference for physicians in clinical practice.

Etanercept biosimilar (recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-α receptor II: IgG Fc fusion protein) and methotrexate combination therapy in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Etanercept biosimilar recombinant human tumour necrosis factor-α receptor II: IgG Fc fusion protein (rhTNFR-Fc, trade name Yisaipu) has shown good efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. To compare the efficacy and safety of rhTNFR-Fc plus methotrexate (MTX) and rhTNFR-Fc plus placebo in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. In this multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive rhTNFR-Fc plus MTX or rhTNFR-Fc plus placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index improvement of at least 75% (PASI 75) from baseline at week 24. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded to evaluate safety. Efficacy analysis was performed using the intent-to-treat principle. A total of 466 patients were enrolled and randomly received rhTNFR-Fc plus MTX (combination group, n = 233) or rhTNFR-Fc plus placebo (monotherapy group, n = 233). PASI 75 at week 24 was significantly higher in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (81.86% vs. 65.50%, p < 0.001). Similar results were observed in other PASI improvement scores at week 12 [PASI 75, 62.39% vs. 44.54% (p < 0.001); PASI 50, 87.17% vs. 75.55% (p = 0.001); and PASI 90, 34.07% vs. 18.78% (p < 0.001)] and week 24 [PASI 50, 92.48% vs. 85.59% (p = 0.019); and PASI 90, 64.16% vs. 42.36% (p < 0.001)]. Significantly more patients had a static Physicians' Global Assessment of clear or almost clear in the combination group than in the monotherapy group at week 12 (26.46% vs. 12.50%, p < 0.001) and week 24 (62.38% vs. 40.83%, p < 0.001). The most common AEs in the two groups were upper respiratory tract infection and abnormal liver function. The combination therapy of rhTNFR-Fc plus MTX was an effective therapy for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, indicating that it was feasible and well tolerated for patients.

Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Ixekizumab in the Treatment of Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE：To evaluate the drug economy of ixekizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS： Literatures were retrieved from PubMed ， Embase， The Cochrane Library ， CNKI and Wanfang database ， supplemented by manual search ，search time from the database establishment to Oct. 31st，2019，using Chinese and English search terms included “Ixekizumab”“Taltz”“Psoriasis”“Pharmacoeconomics”“Cost-benifit analysis ”“Cost-effectiveness analysis ” “Cost-utility analysis ”，etc. The literatures were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Relevant pharmacoeconomic studies about ixekizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were collected ，and the study methods and pharmacoeconomic evaluation results were summarized. RESULTS ：A total of 8 literatures were included ，involving 9 studies. The overall quality of the studies was high. All the studies were distributed in foreign countries such as Canada ，the United States and the United Kingdom. All the studies adopted Markov model. The health outcomes showed that ixekizumab could bring more quality-adjusted life years. Compared with methotrexate combined with phototherapy ，infliximab，ustekinumab and secukinumab ， the incremental cost-utility ratio （ICUR）of ixekizumab was different in different studies. CONCLUSIONS ：Ixekizumab has certain economic advantages for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis ，but there is still a lack of relevant research in China and it is urgent to carry out relevant research suitable for Chinese.

Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis ：A Systematic Re- view / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE：To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in the treatment of moderate-to- severe plaque psoriasis ，and to provide evidence-based reference for the clinical treatment. METHODS ：Retrieved from PubMed ， Embase，Cochrane Library ，CNKI，VIP，Wanfang database during inception to Oct. 2019，randomized controlled trials （RCTs） about guselkumab versus placebo/positive control in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were collected. After literature screening and data extraction ，quality evaluation was performed by using the bias risk evaluation tool recommended by the Cochrane System evaluator manual 5.1.0. Meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 16.0 software. RESULTS ：Eight RCTs with a total of 3 488 patients were included. The results of Meta-analysis indicated that the proportion of patients who achieved 90％ reduction or more from baseline of psoriasis area and severity index （PASI）in guselkumab group was significantly higher than that placebo group [RR ＝26.72，95％CI（15.98，44.70），P＜0.001]，adaliumumab group [RR ＝1.45，95％CI（1.32，1.59）， P＜0.001] and secukinumab group （P＜0.000 1）. The proportion of patients with Investigator ’s Global Assessment （IGA）score of 0 or 1 in guselkumab group was significantly better than placebo group [RR ＝11.15，95％ CI（8.22，15.14），P＜0.001] and adaliumumab group [RR ＝1.27，95％CI（1.19，1.35），P＜0.001]. The proportion of patients with IGA score of 0，the proportion of patients who achieved 75％ reduction or more from baseline of PASI ，dermatology life qu ality index score of 0 or 1 in guselkumab group were signifi cantly superior than placebo group and adaliumumab gr oup，the proportion of patients who achieved 100％ reduction from baseline of PASI in guselkumab group Lewx- was significantly superior than placebo group （P＜0.05）， inn@outlook.com there was no significant difference compared with adaliumumab group （P＞0.05）. There was no statistical significance in the proportion of patients with IGA score of and other secondary outcome indicators between guselkumab and secukinumab group （P＞0.05）. In the safety indicators as total incidence rate of ADR ，rate of withdrawl due to ADR ，etc. ，there was no statistical significance between guselkumab and placebo/ adalimumab groups （P＞0.05）. CONCLUSIONS ：Guselkumab is superior to placebo ，adaliumumab and secukinumab in improving the symptoms of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with good safety .

Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in the Treatment of Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis ：a Meta-analysis / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE： To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis systematically. METHODS： Retrieved from PubMed， Embase， Cochrane Library， VIP， CNKI and CBM， RCTs about apremilast or apremilast combined with other drugs （trial group） versus placebo （control group） in the treatment of moderate- to-severe plaque psoriasis were collected. Meta-analysis was conducted by using Rev Man 5.3 statistical software after literature screening， data extraction and quality evaluation with bias risk evaluation tool of Cochrane System Evaluator Manual 5.1.0. RESULTS： Totally 7 studies were included， involving 2 332 patients. Results of Meta-analysis showed that case number of psoriasis assessment and severity index （PASI） decreased by 75％ （PASI 75％） [OR＝6.44，95％CI（4.90，8.45），P＜0.000 01]， PASI 90％ [OR＝8.13， 95％CI（4.65， 14.22）， P＜0.000 01] and sPGA 0 or 1 [OR＝3.89，95％CI（3.00，5.05），P＜0.000 01]， the incidence of ADR [OR＝1.87，95％CI（1.44，2.43）， P＜0.000 01] in trial group were significantly more or higher than control group. Subgroup analysis by apremilast dose showed that case number of 20 mg PASI 75％ [OR＝4.72，95％CI（2.77，8.05），P＜0.000 01]， 30 mg PASI 75％ [OR＝7.05，95％CI（5.13，9.69），P＜0.000 01]， 20 mg PASI 90％ [OR＝4.27，95％CI（1.80，10.09），P＝0.001]， 30 mg PASI 90％ [OR＝11.11，95％CI（5.27，23.43），P＜0.000 01]， 20 mg sPGA 0 or 1 [OR＝2.82，95％CI（1.51，5.26），P＝0.001]， 30 mg sPGA 0 or 1 [OR＝4.13，95％CI（3.10，5.50），P＜0.000 01]， the incidence of 30 mg ADR [OR＝1.94，95％CI（1.51，2.49），P＜0.000 01] in trial group were significantly more or higher than control group. There was no statistical significance in the incidence of serious ADR [OR＝1.27，95％CI（0.77，2.07），P＝0.35] or case number of ADR leading to withdrawal [OR＝1.48，95％CI（1.00，2.20），P＝0.05] between 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS： Apremilast is effective for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in dose-dependent manner and improve the quality of life， but increase the incidence of ADR.

Randomized, controlled study of bleselumab (ASKP1240) pharmacokinetics and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bleselumab - a fully-human anti-CD40 monoclonal recombinant IgG4. Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were randomized on day 1 to receive bleselumab or placebo on days 1, 15 and 29 in a dose-escalation of bleselumab at 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg. The safety-analysis set (SAF) and full-analysis set (FAS) included all patients who received bleselumab or placebo, and the PK-analysis set (PKAS) included patients in the SAF with ≥1 quantifiable serum bleselumab concentration. Serial blood samples were collected after each dose, and the bleselumab serum concentration was measured. After each dose, the area-under-the-concentration-time curve over 336 hours (AUC336 ) and the maximum serum concentration (Cmax ), and dose proportionality of AUC336 and Cmax were determined. The psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score, the physician static global assessment (PSGA) score, the percentage body surface area (%BSA) affected with psoriasis, adverse events and laboratory parameters were assessed. Sixty patients were randomized and included in the SAF/FAS (bleselumab, n = 49; placebo, n = 11); 48 formed the PKAS. Bleselumab Cmax and AUC336 were more than dose proportional in the range 0.1-3.0 mg/kg, suggesting nonlinear PK after single/multiple doses. No clinically significant infusion reactions, cytokine-release syndrome, or thromboembolic events were reported. Bleselumab did not improve the PASI scores, PSGA scores, or %BSA versus placebo. Transient elevation of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels by >3 × upper limit of normal were observed in four (8.2%) and two (4.1%) patients, respectively, in the 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg groups. Patients with liver function test increases had no concurrent changes in bilirubin. Bleselumab demonstrated nonlinear PK after single and multiple doses, with few adverse reactions.

The budget impact of brodalumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis on US commercial health plans.

INTRODUCTION: Brodalumab is a new biologic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2017 for the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis. This study evaluated the impact of the introduction of brodalumab on the pharmacy budget on US commercial health plans. METHODS: An Excel-based health economic decision analytic model with a US health plan perspective was developed. The model incorporated published moderate-to-severe psoriasis prevalence data; market shares of common biologic drugs, including adalimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and etanercept, used for the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis; 2017-year Wholesale Acquisition Costs for the biologic drugs; drug dispensing fee; patient co-pay; and drug contracting discount. Total annual health plan costs for the biologic drugs were estimated. Scenarios with different proportions of patients treated with brodalumab were compared to a control scenario when no brodalumab was used. RESULTS: In a hypothetical commercial health plan covering two million members, 7,038 moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients were estimated to be eligible for treatment with brodalumab. Prior to brodalumab approval, the proportions of patients treated by other biologics were estimated at 50.8% for adalimumab, 13.5% for ustekinumab, 14.1% for secukinumab, 4.4% for ixekizumab, and 17.2% for etanercept. With a 20% drug price discount applied to all biologics, the annual health plan costs for brodalumab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and etanercept were estimated at $37,224, $49,166, $55,084, $56,061, $64,396, and $57,170, respectively. When no brodalumab is used, the total annual pharmacy budget for the biologics used among these patients was estimated at $414,362,647. Among scenarios where the proportions of brodalumab usage were 3%, 8%, 16%, and 30%, the total annual pharmacy cost was estimated to be reduced by $3,698,129, $9,861,677, $19,723,355, and $36,981,290, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the economic model, brodalumab has the potential to substantially reduce pharmacy expenditures for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in the US.

Cost per additional responder for ixekizumab and other FDA-approved biologics in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence of the cost-efficacy of ixekizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) in the US is limited. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the number needed to treat (NNT) and monthly cost of achieving one additional Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, 90, and 100 responder for ixekizumab and other Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biologics in PsO. METHODS: A network meta-analysis estimated the probability of achieving PASI 75, 90, or 100 response during induction for each biologic. NNTs were calculated using response difference of each respective biologic vs placebo at the end of induction. Monthly costs per additional PASI responder were based on FDA-approved doses, wholesale acquisition costs, and induction NNTs. RESULTS: Induction NNTs for ixekizumab 80 mg once every 2 weeks (Q2W) relative to placebo were consistently lower across all levels of clearance compared with the other biologics. Monthly cost per additional responder was lowest for ustekinumab 45 mg at PASI 75 and for secukinumab 300 mg and ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W at PASI 90. Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W had the lowest cost for PASI 100. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, ixekizumab is the most cost-efficient biologic in the US when targeting complete resolution, as measured by PASI 100 in PsO.

Differences in psoriasis signs and symptom severity between patients with clear and almost clear skin in clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: In psoriasis clinical trials, treatment success is often defined as achieving a static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Patients with clear versus almost clear skin may experience psoriasis differently. This study assessed whether aggregating these patients underestimates subjective improvements associated with total skin clearance. METHODS: Patients with plaque psoriasis with stable sPGA 0 or 1 currently treated with adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, or ustekinumab reported Psoriasis Symptom Inventory (PSI) scores for seven days and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores on day 8. The PSI measures psoriasis signs and symptom severity; the DLQI measures the impact of skin disease on quality of life. This analysis compared PSI and DLQI outcomes between patients with sPGA 0 and 1. RESULTS: This study assessed 230 patients: 79 sPGA 0 and 151 sPGA 1. A greater percentage with sPGA 0 than sPGA 1 achieved a total PSI score of 0 ("best"; 61% vs. 5%, p < 0.0001) and DLQI 0 ("no effect"; 79% vs. 24%, p < 0.001). Patients with sPGA 0 reported better scores than sPGA 1 on all other PSI and DLQI assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving total skin clearance, compared with almost clear skin, provides clinically meaningful improvements in psoriasis.

Estimation of the prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in Spain: The Latent study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy for moderate to severe psoriasis can increase the risk of active tuberculosis in patients who have latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). The main objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of LTBI in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis being treated in dermatology clinics in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Non-interventional, cross-sectional, national epidemiological study conducted in Spain in 2011-2012. Patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were included if they had undergone at least one tuberculin skin test (TST) and/or been evaluated with an interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (QuantiFERON(®) TB Gold In-Tube) in the 2 years preceding the study. RESULTS: Data for 440 patients were valid for analysis. In total, 97.7% of the patients had undergone a TST, with a positive result in 23%. Of the 238 patients in whom the initial result was negative, 5% converted to positive on re-testing for a booster effect. IGRA results were available for 16.8%, 20.5% of them positive. Two of the patients with positive IGRA results had a negative TST. The prevalence of LTBI in the whole sample was 26.6%. The degree of concordance between the TST and the IGRA was moderate (κ=0.516; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of LTBI in this study was similar to previous estimates for Spain.

Health care resource use, productivity, and costs among patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive studies on costs of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (MSPP) have not been conducted in the United States. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate current health care resource use, productivity, and costs among patients with MSPP in routine practice. METHODS: A total of 200 adults seeking MSPP treatment enrolled in 9 US sites. Consented patients reported symptoms, treatment, lost productivity, and costs; 6-month retrospective chart review captured health care resource use and clinical characteristics. Costs were assigned to health care resource use and lost productivity using standard algorithms. Differences by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) group, based on PASI score (≤10, >10-≤20, >20) at enrollment, were evaluated. Analyses included descriptive statistics and analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Most patients (79.5%) were prescribed 1 or more MSPP medications (mean: 1.5); 36.0% and 9.0% received self-administered biologics and systemic therapies, respectively. Mean number of nonprescription treatments was 12.3. Differences by PASI group were observed for overall work and activity impairment (P < .02). Six-month total MSPP direct costs per patient were $11,291; indirect costs were $2101 and differed across PASI groups (P = .0008). LIMITATIONS: This study enrolled patients with MSPP actively seeking care. CONCLUSION: Despite treatment, a number of patients with MSPP continue to experience moderate to severe PASI scores, impaired functioning, and high costs suggesting a need for new treatment options.