The potential of tear proteomics for diagnosis and management of orbital inflammatory disorders including Graves' ophthalmopathy.

BACKGROUND: Orbital compartments harbor a variety of tissues that can be independently targeted in a plethora of disorders resulting in sight-threatening risks. Orbital inflammatory disorders (OID) including Graves' ophthalmopathy, sarcoidosis, IgG4 disease, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and nonspecific orbital inflammation constitute an important cause of pain, diplopia and vision loss. Physical examination, laboratory tests, imaging, and even biopsy are not always adequate to classify orbital inflammation which is frequently deemed "nonspecific". Tear sampling and testing provide a potential "window" to the orbital disease process through a non-invasive technique that allows longitudinal sampling as the disease evolves. Using PubMed/Medline, we identified potentially relevant articles on tear proteomics published in the English language between 1988 and 2021. Of 303 citations obtained, 225 contained empirical data on tear proteins, including 33 publications on inflammatory conditions, 15 in glaucoma, 15 in thyroid eye disease, 1 in sarcoidosis (75) and 2 in uveitis (77,78). Review articles were used to identify an additional 56 relevant articles through citation search. In this review, we provide a short introduction to the potential use of tears as a diagnostic fluid and tool to investigate the mechanism of ocular diseases. A general review of previous tear proteomics studies is also provided, with a focus on Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO), and a discussion of unmet needs in the diagnosis and treatment of orbital inflammatory disease (OID). The review concludes by pointing out current limitations of mass spectrometric analysis of tear proteins and summarizes future needs in the field.

Current use and acceptability of novel diagnostic tests for active tuberculosis: a worldwide survey / Uso atual e aceitabilidade de novos testes diagnósticos para tuberculose ativa: um inquérito mundial

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the current use and potential acceptance (by tuberculosis experts worldwide) of novel rapid tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis that are in line with World Health Organization target product profiles. Methods: A multilingual survey was disseminated online between July and November of 2016. Results: A total of 723 individuals from 114 countries responded to the survey. Smear microscopy was the most commonly used rapid tuberculosis test (available to 90.9% of the respondents), followed by molecular assays (available to 70.7%). Only a small proportion of the respondents in middle- and low-income countries had access to interferon-gamma-release assays. Serological and lateral flow immunoassays were used by more than a quarter (25.4%) of the respondents. Among the respondents who had access to molecular tests, 46.7% were using the Xpert assay overall, that proportion being higher in lower middle-income countries (55.6%) and low-income countries (76.6%). The data also suggest that there was some alignment of pricing for molecular assays. Respondents stated they would accept novel rapid tuberculosis tests if available, including molecular assays (acceptable to 86.0%) or biomarker-based serological assays (acceptable to 81.7%). Simple biomarker-based assays were more commonly deemed acceptable in middle- and low-income countries. Conclusions: Second-generation molecular assays have become more widely available in high- and low-resource settings. However, the development of novel rapid tuberculosis tests continues to be considered important by tuberculosis experts. Our data also underscore the need for additional training and education of end users.

RESUMO Objetivo: Determinar o uso atual e a aceitação potencial (por especialistas em tuberculose em todo o mundo) de novos testes rápidos para o diagnóstico de tuberculose que estão alinhados com os perfis de produtos alvo da Organização Mundial da Saúde. Métodos: Um inquérito multilingue foi divulgado on-line entre julho e novembro de 2016. Resultados: Um total de 723 indivíduos de 114 países respondeu ao inquérito. A baciloscopia foi o teste rápido para tuberculose mais utilizado (disponível para 90,9% dos entrevistados), seguida de ensaios moleculares (disponível para 70,7%). Apenas uma pequena proporção dos entrevistados de países de renda média e baixa tinha acesso a ensaios de liberação de IFN-γ. Imunoensaios de fluxo lateral e testes sorológicos eram utilizados por mais de um quarto dos entrevistados (25,4%). Entre os entrevistados que tinham acesso a testes moleculares, 46,7% utilizavam o teste Xpert de forma geral, sendo essa proporção maior em países de renda média baixa (55,6%) e renda baixa (76,6%). Os dados também sugerem que houve algum alinhamento de preços para testes moleculares. Os entrevistados afirmaram que aceitariam novos testes rápidos para tuberculose, se disponíveis, incluindo testes moleculares (aceitáveis para 86,0%) ou testes sorológicos baseados em biomarcadores (aceitáveis para 81,7%). Testes simples baseados em biomarcadores foram mais comumente considerados aceitáveis nos países de renda média e baixa. Conclusões: Os testes moleculares de segunda geração tornaram-se mais amplamente disponíveis em locais tanto com poucos quanto com muitos recursos. No entanto, o desenvolvimento de novos testes rápidos para tuberculose continua a ser considerado importante por especialistas em tuberculose. Nossos dados também ressaltam a necessidade de maior formação e educação dos usuários finais.

Treatment decisions and mortality in HIV-positive presumptive smear-negative TB in the Xpert™ MTB/RIF era: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The Xpert™ MTB/RIF (XP) has a higher sensitivity than sputum smear microscopy (70% versus 35%) for TB diagnosis and has been endorsed by the WHO for TB high burden countries to increase case finding among HIV co-infected presumptive TB patients. Its impact on the diagnosis of smear-negative TB in a routine care setting is unclear. We determined the change in diagnosis, treatment and mortality of smear-negative presumptive TB with routine use of Xpert MTB/RIF (XP). METHODS: Prospective cohort study of HIV-positive smear-negative presumptive TB patients during a 12-month period after XP implementation in a well-staffed and trained integrated TB/HIV clinic in Kampala, Uganda. Prior to testing clinicians were asked to decide whether they would treat empirically prior to Xpert result; actual treatment was decided upon receipt of the XP result. We compared empirical and XP-informed treatment decisions and all-cause mortality in the first year. RESULTS: Of 411 smear-negative presumptive TB patients, 175 (43%) received an XP; their baseline characteristics did not differ. XP positivity was similar in patients with a pre-XP empirical diagnosis and those without (9/29 [17%] versus 14/142 [10%], P = 0.23). Despite XP testing high levels of empirical treatment prevailed (18%), although XP results did change who ultimately was treated for TB. When adjusted for CD4 count, empirical treatment was not associated with higher mortality compared to no or microbiologically confirmed treatment. CONCLUSIONS: XP usage was lower than expected. The lower sensitivity of XP in smear-negative HIV-positive patients led experienced clinicians to use XP as a "rule-in" rather than "rule-out" test, with the majority of patients still treated empirically.

Clinical phenotype assessment is very important in mutation analysis for patients with hereditary eye disease / 中华实验眼科杂志

Sanger sequencing technology is the most commonly used method for genetic analysis in inherited eye disease in the past few decades on account of its long DNA sequencing read length and high accuracy.However,application of this method is limited in genetically heterogeneous diseases because of the high economic and time cost.Next generation sequencing (NGS) technology is a high-throughput,cost-effective,and highly automated method which has been widely used since 2005.Although NGS is especially suitable for studies on genetically heterogeneous inherited eye disease,overdependence on the technique itself and neglect of the assessment of the phenotype may lead to misjudgment of the testing results and higher economic burden for the patients.So far,the most common method on researches of monogenic inherited eye disease is to combine NGS and Sanger sequencing technique.Precise evaluation of the clinical phenotype of patients is very important,as it is related with selection of detection methods and determination of disease-causing mutations.