ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a topical combination of moxidectin 3.5%, imidacloprid 10% and praziquantel 10% for the prevention of Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy, 1856) infection in dogs. For this purpose, a randomized and controlled clinical trial was conducted between August 2021 and October 2022, in the municipality of Goiana, state of Pernambuco, north-eastern Brazil, where heartworm is highly prevalent. Of the 213 dogs initially sampled (baseline), 68 (31.9%) were positive for adult antigens (SNAP 4Dx Plus, Idexx) and/or microfilariae (modified Knott's test). On day 0, 140 negative dogs were randomly included in the treatment and control groups, 70 animals each. During the study, 60 dogs (34 treated and 26 untreated) were removed for different reasons. At the end of the study (day 360 ± 2), 36 treated and 44 untreated were sampled and included in the efficacy calculation. The efficacy against the development of adults and microfilariae was 84.7%, with only one treated dog being positive for adult antigens but negative for microfilariae. On the other hand, eight untreated dogs were positive for adult antigens and/or microfilariae, resulting in a significant difference in the number of positives between groups (Chi-square test = 4.706, df = 1, P = 0.0301). Remarkably, the efficacy against the appearance of D. immitis microfilariae was 100% (i.e., all treated dogs negative) and three untreated dogs were positive for microfilariae. The topical combination of moxidectin 3.5%, imidacloprid 10% and praziquantel 10% significantly reduced the risk of D. immitis infection in treated dogs as compared with untreated dogs, in a highly endemic area in north-eastern Brazil.
Subject(s)
Dirofilaria immitis , Dirofilariasis , Dog Diseases , Neonicotinoids , Nitro Compounds , Animals , Dogs , Dirofilariasis/drug therapy , Dirofilariasis/prevention & control , Dog Diseases/drug therapy , Dog Diseases/prevention & control , Drug Therapy, Combination , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Microfilariae , Praziquantel/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Strongyloides stercoralis is a soil-transmitted intestinal nematode with a complex life cycle that primarily affects humans, non-human primates, dogs, and occasionally cats. This study presents, to the best of our knowledge, the first case of S. stercoralis infection and its genotyping in a domestic dog from Argentina. METHODS: The patient was a female wired-haired Teckel dog exhibiting recurrent coughing. Coproparasitological analysis using the Baermann technique revealed the presence of rhabditiform larvae morphologically compatible with S. stercoralis. To confirm this finding, molecular diagnosis (18S ribosomal RNA) and analysis of the cox1 gene were performed. RESULTS: We identified a haplotype (HP20) that has previously only been related to S. stercoralis infection in dogs, but was found in the present study to be highly related to the haplotype (HP16) of a zoonotic variant and divergent from those previously described from human patients in Argentina. Furthermore, unlike in human cases following treatment with ivermectin, the dog was negative after moxidectin treatment according to polymerase chain reaction of the sampled faeces. CONCLUSIONS: This case report shows the importance of further investigation into potential transmission events and prevalences of S. stercoralis in dogs and humans in South America. The results reported here should also encourage future work that examines different scenarios of infection with S. stercoralis in dogs and humans with the aim of integrating clinical management, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up strategies in the quest for new approaches for the treatment of this disease in animals and humans. The findings support the adoption of a One Health approach, which recognizes the interconnectedness between animal and human health, in addressing parasitic infections such as strongyloidiasis.
Subject(s)
Strongyloides stercoralis , Strongyloidiasis , Humans , Animals , Dogs , Female , Strongyloidiasis/diagnosis , Strongyloidiasis/drug therapy , Strongyloidiasis/veterinary , Strongyloides stercoralis/genetics , Argentina/epidemiology , Feces/parasitology , Life Cycle StagesABSTRACT
Dirofilaria immitis (the canine heartworm) is widespread in the tropics, with prevalence surpassing 30% in high-risk areas. In addition to the suitable climatic conditions that favour mosquito abundance and filarial larva development, there is low compliance with the recommended year-round use of preventives in these transmission hotspots. This represents a major concern, considering that melarsomine (first-line heartworm adulticide) is unavailable in several tropical countries, resulting in the so-called slow-kill protocol being the only available adulticide treatment option. In this article, the members of TroCCAP (Tropical Council for Companion Animal Parasites) review the current distribution of heartworm in the tropics and the availability of melarsomine, and discuss alternatives for the management of heartworm infections in dogs.
Subject(s)
Dirofilaria immitis , Dirofilariasis , Dog Diseases , Filaricides , Animals , Dogs , Dirofilariasis/drug therapy , Dirofilariasis/epidemiology , Dirofilariasis/prevention & control , Filaricides/therapeutic use , Dog Diseases/drug therapy , Dog Diseases/parasitologyABSTRACT
Rhipicephalus microplus, also known as the cattle tick, is the parasite with the greatest impact on cattle in Brazil. The most common method for controlling this tick is the application of synthetic chemical acaricides, especially ivermectin, which belongs to the group of macrocyclic lactones (MLs). However, because ivermectin is widely used, there is concern about the development of cross-resistance within this chemical class. Thus, engorged females were collected from farms with a history of resistance to ivermectin, which was the only one among the MLs that was used as an endectocide drug. Using larval immersion tests (LIT), bioassays were performed with ivermectin, moxidectin and eprinomectin on populations of R. microplus from the semiarid region of the states of Paraíba and Ceará, Brazil. Epidemiological questionnaires were applied to collect information about tick control management. All the evaluated populations showed cross-resistance between ivermectin and moxidectin, but only one population showed cross-resistance between ivermectin and eprinomectin. Weekly or monthly administration of injectable 1% ivermectin on farms was reported. It was concluded that the frequent use of ivermectin may lead to the development of cross-resistance to moxidectin. For eprinomectin, despite the structural similarity, cross-resistance was not observed in three tick populations.
Subject(s)
Acaricides , Cattle Diseases , Rhipicephalus , Tick Infestations , Acaricides/pharmacology , Animals , Brazil , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Female , Ivermectin/pharmacology , Lactones , Tick Infestations/parasitologyABSTRACT
Sheep scab, or psoroptic mange, a disease caused by the mite Psoroptes ovis, is commonly treated with ivermectin (IVM) and other macrocyclic lactones. In Argentina, in vivo trials have shown a decrease in IVM effectiveness to treat both sheep and bovine scab. In this work, we used an in vitro technique to establish the efficacy of IVM and two other macrocyclic lactones, doramectin (DRM) and moxidectin (MXD), against P. ovis in sheep. Mites were exposed to plates with culture medium and either ethanol or each of the acaricides, and mite mortality at a diagnostic concentration of IVM was assessed. Total survival in one of the strains studied demonstrated the presence of resistance, associated with control failures previously described by the authors. These resistant mites also presented larger LC50 values for both DRM and MXD than expected. Since, in in vivo trials, we had also previously observed a decrease in DRM effectiveness, cross-resistance may exist between DRM and IVM. We propose the use of in vitro tests to evaluate the efficacy of acaricides, considering their practicality, low cost and proven usefulness in detecting resistance in cases of low effectiveness against sheep scab.
Subject(s)
Mite Infestations , Mites , Psoroptidae , Sheep Diseases , Animals , Argentina , Cattle , Ivermectin/pharmacology , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Mite Infestations/drug therapy , Mite Infestations/veterinary , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/drug therapyABSTRACT
Nematicide combinations may be a valid strategy to achieve effective nematode control in the presence of drug resistance. The goal of the current trial was to evaluate the pharmaco-parasitological performance of the moxidectin (MOX) and levamisole (LEV) combination after four years of continuous use in lambs naturally parasitized with multi-resistant gastrointestinal nematodes. At the beginning of the trial, 40 lambs were divided into four groups (n = 10), which were untreated (control) or subcutaneously treated with MOX (0.2 mg/kg), LEV (8 mg/kg) or with the combination MOX + LEV (administered separately at 0.2 and 8 mg/kg, respectively). Blood samples were collected at different times post-treatment and LEV and MOX plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC. The clinical efficacy of the continuous use of MOX + LEV combination was assessed with the controlled efficacy test (CET), performed at the beginning and end of the study, and with the faecal egg count reduction (FECR) test, performed over the four-year study period. No significant adverse pharmacokinetic changes were observed either for MOX or LEV after their co-administration to infected lambs. The CET (first year) showed efficacies of 84.3 % (Haemonchus contortus), 100 % (Teladorsagia circumcincta and Trichostrongylus axei), and 97.4 % (T. colubriformis). After the repetitive use of the combined treatment for four years, those efficacies remained high (100 %) and only decreased to 58 % against T. colubriformis. The evaluation of the FECR over the study period showed fluctuations in the performance of the combined administration. The initial FECR (2014) was 99 % (MOX), 85 % (LEV) and 100 % (MOX + LEV). The co-administration of MOX + LEV during the four-year experimental period resulted in a significantly higher anthelmintic effect (87 %) than that of MOX (42 %) or LEV (69 %) given alone. The combined use of MOX + LEV to control resistant gastrointestinal nematodes appears to be a valid strategy under specific management conditions. A high initial therapeutic response to the combination would be a relevant feature for the success of this tool.
Subject(s)
Levamisole/therapeutic use , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Nematoda/drug effects , Nematode Infections/veterinary , Sheep Diseases/drug therapy , Animals , Anthelmintics/administration & dosage , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Area Under Curve , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Combinations , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Female , Half-Life , Levamisole/administration & dosage , Levamisole/pharmacokinetics , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Macrolides/pharmacokinetics , Male , Nematode Infections/drug therapy , Nematode Infections/parasitology , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/parasitologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Dirofilaria immitis is a life-threatening nematode spreading globally. Arsenical treatment is currently recommended for removal of adult worms. However, arsenical treatment is not available in some countries, and there are dogs that cannot tolerate the rapid kill of adult worms; therefore, alternative adulticide slow-kill treatments are needed. Criticisms against the use of these alternative protocols include the potential for allowing disease to progress and for the development of ML-resistant worms. METHODS: The efficacy of a protocol that includes semi-annual doses (i.e. every 6 months) of commercially available extended-release injectable moxidectin suspension (ProHeart® SR-12) with 30-day oral administration of doxycycline was studied in 20 dogs with naturally occurring D. immitis infections. Each dog received treatment with ProHeart® SR-12 (0.5 mg moxidectin/kg) by subcutaneous injection and oral doxycycline (10 mg/kg/bid × 30 days) every 6 months until two consecutive negative antigen test results were obtained. Pulmonary and cardiac evaluations were performed by radiographic and echocardiographic parameters. Physical examinations, complete blood counts, clinical chemistry profiles, microfilariae and antigen tests were performed periodically. RESULTS: At enrollment, all dogs were positive for D. immitis antigen and 18 were microfilaremic. On day 30, microfilaremia counts decreased, and all dogs became amicrofilaremic by day 150. On day 180, 11 dogs were antigen-negative, and 7 more became negative by day 360. The two remaining antigen-positive dogs converted to negative by day 540 or 810. All antigen tests performed 180 days after the first negative test were negative. There was no decline in cardiac performance of the dogs throughout the study. Overall, pulmonary clinical conditions, presence of worms by echocardiography, and enlargement of caudal and main pulmonary arteries improved after treatment. Physical examinations, complete blood count results, and clinical chemistry profiles were within normal reference values. Respiratory conditions were improved, no damage to the heart was observed, and the treatment protocol was well tolerated by the animals. CONCLUSIONS: This alternative adulticide treatment was efficacious and well tolerated in naturally infected dogs. The injectable formulation provides the advantage of having veterinarians able to administer, monitor, and assess the efficacy and condition of the dog throughout the treatment and post-treatment periods.
Subject(s)
Dirofilaria immitis/drug effects , Dirofilariasis/drug therapy , Dog Diseases/drug therapy , Filaricides , Administration, Oral , Animals , Anthelmintics/administration & dosage , Anthelmintics/pharmacology , Antigens, Helminth/blood , Dogs , Doxycycline/administration & dosage , Doxycycline/pharmacology , Drug Therapy, Combination/veterinary , Filaricides/administration & dosage , Filaricides/pharmacology , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Macrolides/pharmacology , Microfilariae/drug effectsABSTRACT
Canine heartworm disease (CHD) results from infection with Dirofilaria immitis and while it is of global concern, it is most prevalent in tropical climates where conditions support the parasite and vector life cycles. Melarsomine dihydrochloride is the sole treatment for CHD recommended by the American Heartworm Society. However, in cases where cost or access to melarsomine precludes treatment of an infected dog, therapeutic alternatives are warranted. This randomized, controlled field study evaluated the adulticidal efficacy of a combination therapeutic protocol using 10 % imidacloprid + 2.5 % moxidectin spot-on and a single 28-day course of doxycycline and compared with that of a 2-dose melarsomine dihydrochloride protocol. Of 37 naturally-infected domestic dogs with class 1, 2 or early class 3 CHD enrolled in the study, 30 were evaluated for a minimum of 12 months. Seven dogs were withdrawn due to canine ehrlichiosis, non-compliance, or wrongful inclusion. Dogs were randomly assigned to a control (CP, nâ¯=â¯15) or investigational (IVP, nâ¯=â¯15) treatment group. CP dogs received two injections of melarsomine dihydrochloride (2.5â¯mg/kg) 24â¯-hs apart and maintained on monthly ivermectin/pyrantel. IVP dogs were treated with oral doxycycline (10â¯mg/kg twice daily for 28 days) and topical 10 % imidacloprid + 2.5 % moxidectin once monthly for 9 months. Dogs were evaluated up to 18 months - monthly for the first 9 months, then every 3 months. Parasiticidal efficacy was based on antigen status using the IDEXX PetChek® 34 Heartworm-PF Antigen test. By month 18, antigen was not detected in any study dog except one from the IVP group. One other IVP dog was persistently antigenemic and treated with melarsomine at month 12 according to the initial study protocol. Mean antigen concentration (based on optical density) decreased more rapidly in the CP group and by month 15 was 0.11 for the IVP and 0.07 for CP groups, with equivalent median concentrations (0.04) in both groups. Conversion following heat-treatment of antigen-negative samples occurred frequently and at similar rates in both treatment groups. Based on the bias of diagnostic tests towards detection of female worms, we conclude that monthly application of 10 % imidacloprid + 2.5 % moxidectin for 9 months combined with a course of doxycycline twice daily for 28 days resulted in effective therapy against female adults in CHD. This therapeutic option may be particularly useful in cases where financial constraint or access to melarsomine precludes treatment of an infected individual. This study was supported by Bayer Animal Health.
Subject(s)
Dirofilariasis/drug therapy , Dirofilariasis/prevention & control , Dog Diseases/drug therapy , Dog Diseases/prevention & control , Drug Therapy, Combination/veterinary , Filaricides/therapeutic use , Animals , Dirofilaria immitis , Dogs , Doxycycline/administration & dosage , Female , Grenada , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Neonicotinoids/administration & dosage , Nitro Compounds/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Macrocyclic lactones are the most widely used drugs for the control of gastrointestinal nematodes of horses in Argentina. Ivermectin and moxidectin are used as broad spectrum anthelmintics and although there are several international reports on the resistance of Parascaris spp., the resistance status of the local nematode population is largely unknow. This report informs a case of suboptimal efficacy to both drugs to control Parascaris spp in foals in central Argentina. In February 2018, routine fecal parasite egg counts showed a moderate-high number of Parascaris spp eggs (mean = 680 eggs per gram of feces) in foals treated approximately one month before with moxidectin. Upon suspicion of resistance of this parasite to the macrocyclic lactones, 24 of these animals were selected for a fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). Twelve foals were treated with ivermectin and the remaining 12 animals with moxidectin. Two weeks after treatment, the FECRT was 48.1% and 34.8% for moxidectin and ivermectin respectively (25% of the animals increased the number of eggs in feces after treatment). Five days later, the administration of fenbendazole resulted in a FECRT = 100%. The monitoring of the status of susceptibility or resistance in each establishment is critical for the design of control programs based on rational and sustainable use of anthelmintics.
Subject(s)
Antinematodal Agents/therapeutic use , Ascaridida Infections/veterinary , Ascaridoidea/drug effects , Horse Diseases/drug therapy , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Animals , Argentina , Ascaridida Infections/drug therapy , Ascaridida Infections/parasitology , Female , Horse Diseases/parasitology , Horses , MaleABSTRACT
Lynxacarus radovskyi are mites commonly found within domestic feline hair stems. The infested animal presents an opaque fur with a "salt and pepper" aspect. The contamination may occur by direct contact with other infected animals or by fomites, and the main diagnostic tool is the direct examination of the fur. The Feline Eosinophilic Granuloma Complex (FEGC) is a dermatological pattern of an immune answer against many types of injuries in felines, mainly during allergic reactions, and the treatment of choice are corticosteroids. The objective of this work was to document the linxcariosis cases at the Veterinary Hospital Professor Ricardo Alexandre Hippler-University of Vila Velha. Futhermore, the work also meant to research the association between the parasite contagion and the occurrence of FEGC injuries, which commonly occurred. Between April 2017 and August 2018, there were 8 reported cases of felines infested with L. radovskyi. The diagnoses were made with Acetate tape impression or by direct fur examination. Seven out of the eight cats presented with at least one characteristic injury of the FEGC. In all of them the chosen treatment was moxidectin or spot-on imidacloprid plus corticotherapy on the cats with FEGC, which were effective.
ABSTRACT
Anthelmintics are used to combat nematodes. The misuse of anthelmintics can raise the cost of milk production. The objective of this research was to determine the presence of anthelmintics in goat milk. Twenty goats were used, divided into four groups of five animals: I- animals treated with an ivermectin-based anthelmintic; II- animals treated with moxidectin; III- animals treated with levamisole hydrochloride; and IV: animals treated with albendazole. Milk samples were collected individually: before, and 1, 2, 3, 15 and 21 days after administration of the anthelmintics. Determination of anthelmintic residues was performed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). According to the results, there was an exponential effect (P<0.05) for ivermectin and moxidectin. Moxidectin was the anthelmintic that left a residue in the milk for the longest time, up to 21 days. However, with all the anthelmintics researched, residues were below the maximum limit recommended by the inspecting agencies.(AU)
Anthelmintics são usados para combater nematodes. O mau uso de anti-helmínticos pode aumentar o custo da produção de leite. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi determinar a presença de anti-helmínticos no leite de cabra. Foram utilizados vinte cabras, divididos em quatro grupos de cinco animais: I - animais tratados com um antihelmíntico à base de ivermectina; II - animais tratados com moxidectina; III- animais tratados com cloridrato de levamisol; E IV: animais tratados com albendazole. Amostras de leite foram coletadas individualmente: antes, e 1, 2, 3, 15 e 21 dias após a administração dos anti-helmínticos. A determinação dos resíduos antihelmínticos foi realizada por cromatografia líquida-espectrometria de massa (LC-MS). De acordo com os resultados, houve um efeito exponencial (P <0.05) para ivermectina e moxidectina. A moxidectina foi o anti-helmíntico que deixou um resíduo no leite por mais tempo, até 21 dias. Contudo, com todos os anthelmintics pesquisados, os resíduos estavam abaixo do limite máximo recomendado pelas agências de inspeção.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Ruminants , Milk/toxicity , Food Pollutants, Chemical , Anthelmintics/administration & dosage , Ivermectin , Mass Spectrometry/veterinaryABSTRACT
Abstract The purpose of this work was to identify, critically assess, and summarize available data from primary research about the anthelmintic resistance of injectable macrocyclic lactones in cattle. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled Odds Ratio and 95% Confidence Intervals. Of the 1504 abstracts screened for eligibility, 80 were deemed relevant for full publication review. Thirteen publications were included in the qualitative synthesis and assessed for systematic bias. Only five studies were included in the quantitative analysis because they showed a low risk of producing biased results in all the parameters. The forest plot indicated four studies that discuss anthelmintic resistance (P<0.05), while only one study did not discuss anthelmintic resistance (P<0.05). The pooled estimate showed 0.59 (95% Confidence intervals: 0.08, 0.47) times higher odds for studies that report anthelmintic resistance than for studies reporting efficacious anthelmintic treatment, with significant and substantially low heterogeneity (I2=25%). Anthelmintic resistance to injectable macrocyclic lactones is a reality. There are need to improve methodological reporting in studies, which is a problem for investigations that involves systematic review and meta-analysis (SR-MA).
Resumo O objetivo deste trabalho foi identificar, avaliar criticamente e resumir os dados disponíveis da literatura primária sobre resistência anti-helmíntica a lactonas macrocíclicas injetáveis em bovinos. Uma meta-análise foi realizada para estimar o "Odds Ratio" e Intervalos de Confiança (95%). Dos 1504 resumos selecionados para elegibilidade, 80 foram considerados relevantes para a revisão completa da publicação. Treze publicações foram incluídas na síntese qualitativa, as quais foram avaliadas quanto ao viés sistemático. Apenas cinco estudos foram incluídos na análise quantitativa porque apresentaram um baixo risco de produzir resultados tendenciosos em todos os parâmetros. O gráfico de floresta indicou quatro estudos que apresentaram resistência anti-helmíntica (P <0,05), enquanto um não apresentou (P <0,05). A estimativa combinada mostrou uma maior probabilidade de publicações de estudos que relatam resistência anti-helmíntica no valor de 0,59 (95%: 0,8, 0,47) do que estudos relatando tratamento anti-helmíntico eficaz. Os dados apresentaram baixa heterogeneidade (I2 = 25%). A resistência anti-helmíntica a lactonas macrocíclicas é uma realidade. Há a necessidade de melhorar a metodologia dos estudos, pois é um problema para os trabalhos que envolvem revisões sistemáticas e meta-análises (RS-MA).
Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Drug Resistance , Lactams, Macrocyclic/administration & dosage , Gastrointestinal Diseases/veterinary , Anthelmintics/administration & dosage , Nematode Infections/veterinary , Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/parasitology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/drug therapy , Nematode Infections/parasitology , Nematode Infections/drug therapyABSTRACT
We evaluated the comparative plasma disposition kinetics and efficacy of moxidectin (MXD), administered by the intraruminal (IR) or subcutaneous (SC) route at two different dosage levels (0.2 and 1 mg/kg) in feedlot calves. Additionally, the efficacy was compared to an ivermectin (IVM, SC administration) treated group. This study was divided into two separate studies, the "Pharmacokinetic (PK) study" and the "Efficacy study". The "PK study" involved 24 calves free of gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN), which were allocated into 4 groups (n = 6) and treated with MXD by either the SC or the IR route at the therapeutic (MXDSC0.2, MXDIR0.2, respectively) or at fivefold the therapeutic dose (MXDSC1.0, MXDIR1.0, respectively). Blood samples were collected from 3 h up to 14 days post-treatment. MXD concentrations in plasma samples were analyzed by HPLC. The "Efficacy study" included 125 calves naturally infected with GIN, which were allocated into five experimental groups (n = 25 each); the same four MXD-treated groups described for the "PK study", and an additional group treated by the SC route with IVM (IVMSC0.2). The efficacy of IVM given at its therapeutic dose and the different MXD groups at the therapeutic and fivefold the therapeutic dose was calculated by analysis of the individual efficacy using the package eggCounts-2.1-1' on the R software environment, version 3.5.0 (R Core Team, 2018). Daily weight gain (DWG) was also measured over the first 47 days of the fattening cycle. Independently of the administration route, MXD peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were higher in groups treated with the higher dose (1.0 mg/kg), whereas a longer time to reach Cmax (Tmax) was observed after the IR treatments. The observed MXD efficacies were 85% (MXDSC0.2), 94% (MXDSC1.0), 84% (MXDIR0.2) and 99% (MXDIR1.0), at day +27. At day +27, all MXD-treated groups showed higher efficacies than the group having received IVM (45%). The post-treatment Cooperia spp. L3 counts were particularly low in the groups MXDSC1.0 and MXDIR1.0. All of the groups treated with MXD showed better DWG than the IVMSC0.2 group (P = 0.01). Dose and administration route modifications effectively improved the anthelmintic and productive performance of MXD. A high dose of MXD improved the control of IVM-resistant GIN in feedlot calves. However, this practice must be taken with caution, since MXD resistance could rapidly emerge, especially in grazing cattle.
Subject(s)
Anthelmintics/administration & dosage , Anthelmintics/pharmacokinetics , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Macrolides/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Area Under Curve , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Routes/veterinary , Drug Resistance , Gastrointestinal Tract/parasitology , Ivermectin/administration & dosage , Ivermectin/pharmacokinetics , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Nematoda/drug effects , Parasite Egg Count , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Anthelmintics are used to combat nematodes. The misuse of anthelmintics can raise the cost of milk production. The objective of this research was to determine the presence of anthelmintics in goat milk. Twenty goats were used, divided into four groups of five animals: I- animals treated with an ivermectin-based anthelmintic; II- animals treated with moxidectin; III- animals treated with levamisole hydrochloride; and IV: animals treated with albendazole. Milk samples were collected individually: before, and 1, 2, 3, 15 and 21 days after administration of the anthelmintics. Determination of anthelmintic residues was performed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). According to the results, there was an exponential effect (P<0.05) for ivermectin and moxidectin. Moxidectin was the anthelmintic that left a residue in the milk for the longest time, up to 21 days. However, with all the anthelmintics researched, residues were below the maximum limit recommended by the inspecting agencies.
Anthelmintics são usados para combater nematodes. O mau uso de anti-helmínticos pode aumentar o custo da produção de leite. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi determinar a presença de anti-helmínticos no leite de cabra. Foram utilizados vinte cabras, divididos em quatro grupos de cinco animais: I - animais tratados com um antihelmíntico à base de ivermectina; II - animais tratados com moxidectina; III- animais tratados com cloridrato de levamisol; E IV: animais tratados com albendazole. Amostras de leite foram coletadas individualmente: antes, e 1, 2, 3, 15 e 21 dias após a administração dos anti-helmínticos. A determinação dos resíduos antihelmínticos foi realizada por cromatografia líquida-espectrometria de massa (LC-MS). De acordo com os resultados, houve um efeito exponencial (P <0.05) para ivermectina e moxidectina. A moxidectina foi o anti-helmíntico que deixou um resíduo no leite por mais tempo, até 21 dias. Contudo, com todos os anthelmintics pesquisados, os resíduos estavam abaixo do limite máximo recomendado pelas agências de inspeção.
Subject(s)
Animals , Anthelmintics/administration & dosage , Food Pollutants, Chemical , Ivermectin , Milk/toxicity , Ruminants , Mass Spectrometry/veterinaryABSTRACT
The purpose of this work was to identify, critically assess, and summarize available data from primary research about the anthelmintic resistance of injectable macrocyclic lactones in cattle. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled Odds Ratio and 95% Confidence Intervals. Of the 1504 abstracts screened for eligibility, 80 were deemed relevant for full publication review. Thirteen publications were included in the qualitative synthesis and assessed for systematic bias. Only five studies were included in the quantitative analysis because they showed a low risk of producing biased results in all the parameters. The forest plot indicated four studies that discuss anthelmintic resistance (P 0.05), while only one study did not discuss anthelmintic resistance (P 0.05). The pooled estimate showed 0.59 (95% Confidence intervals: 0.08, 0.47) times higher odds for studies that report anthelmintic resistance than for studies reporting efficacious anthelmintic treatment, with significant and substantially low heterogeneity (I2=25%). Anthelmintic resistance to injectable macrocyclic lactones is a reality. There are need to improve methodological reporting in studies, which is a problem for investigations that involves systematic review and meta-analysis (SR-MA).(AU)
O objetivo deste trabalho foi identificar, avaliar criticamente e resumir os dados disponíveis da literatura primária sobre resistência anti-helmíntica a lactonas macrocíclicas injetáveis em bovinos. Uma meta-análise foi realizada para estimar o Odds Ratio e Intervalos de Confiança (95%). Dos 1504 resumos selecionados para elegibilidade, 80 foram considerados relevantes para a revisão completa da publicação. Treze publicações foram incluídas na síntese qualitativa, as quais foram avaliadas quanto ao viés sistemático. Apenas cinco estudos foram incluídos na análise quantitativa porque apresentaram um baixo risco de produzir resultados tendenciosos em todos os parâmetros. O gráfico de floresta indicou quatro estudos que apresentaram resistência anti-helmíntica (P 0,05), enquanto um não apresentou (P 0,05). A estimativa combinada mostrou uma maior probabilidade de publicações de estudos que relatam resistência anti-helmíntica no valor de 0,59 (95%: 0,8, 0,47) do que estudos relatando tratamento anti-helmíntico eficaz. Os dados apresentaram baixa heterogeneidade (I2 = 25%). A resistência anti-helmíntica a lactonas macrocíclicas é uma realidade. Há a necessidade de melhorar a metodologia dos estudos, pois é um problema para os trabalhos que envolvem revisões sistemáticas e meta-análises (RS-MA).(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Lactones/analysis , Lactones/classification , Lactones/immunology , Lactams, Macrocyclic/analysis , Lactams, Macrocyclic/classification , Lactams, Macrocyclic/immunology , Ivermectin , AnthelminticsABSTRACT
To date, a tissue depletion study of moxidectin (MOX) in lambs is not available. Thus, considering that lamb meat is of great commercial interest in the world, the aim of the present study was to determine the residue levels of MOX in lamb target-tissues (muscle, liver, kidney and fat) and subsequently calculate the MOX withdrawal period. For this purpose, the target-tissues were analysed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Method validation was performed based on Commission Decision 2002/657/EC and VICH GL49. To quantify the analyte, matrix-matched analytical curves were constructed with spiked blank tissues. The limits of detection and quantitation were 1.5 and 5 ng g-1, respectively, for all matrices. The linearity, decision limit, detection capability accuracy and inter- and intra-day precision of the method are reported. The lambs were treated with a single subcutaneous dose of 0.2 mg MOX kg-1 body weight and were slaughtered in accordance with accepted animal care protocols. Samples of target-tissues were collected on 2, 4, 7, 14, 28 and 42 days after MOX administration. During the whole study, the highest drug residue level occurred in the fat. For the other target-tissues (muscle, liver and kidney), MOX concentrations were below the maximum residue limit (MRL). Considering the MRL value of 500 µg kg-1 for MOX residues in sheep fat, our results in lambs allowed the estimation of a MOX withdrawal period of 31 days. This indicates that the withdrawal period established for MOX in adult sheep (28 days) does not apply for lambs.
Subject(s)
Drug Residues/analysis , Drug Residues/pharmacokinetics , Fats/chemistry , Kidney/chemistry , Liver/chemistry , Macrolides/administration & dosage , Macrolides/analysis , Muscles/chemistry , Animals , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Injections, Subcutaneous , Macrolides/pharmacokinetics , Meat/analysis , Sheep, Domestic , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Tissue DistributionABSTRACT
The development and validation of a throughput method for the quantitation of moxidectin residues in lamb target tissues (muscle, kidney, liver and fat) was conducted using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). To achieve higher recovery of the analyte from the matrices, a modified QuEChERS method was used for sample preparation. The chromatographic separation was achieved using a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD column with a mobile phase comprising 5mM ammonium formate solution +0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile +0.1% formic acid (B) in a linear gradient program. Method validation was performed based on the Commission Decision 2002/657/EC and VICH GL49. To quantify the analyte, matrix-matched analytical curves were constructed with spiked blank tissues, with a limit of quantitation of 5ngg-1 and limit of detection of 1.5ngg-1 for all matrices. The linearity, decision limit, detection capability accuracy, and inter- and intra-day repeatability of the method are reported. The method was successfully applied to incurred lamb tissue samples (muscle, liver, kidney and fat) in a concentration range from 5 to 200µgkg-1, which demonstrated its suitability for monitoring moxidectin residues in lamb tissues in health surveillance programs, as well as for pharmacokinetics and residue depletion studies.
Subject(s)
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Drug Residues/analysis , Macrolides/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Animals , Drug Residues/chemistry , Drug Residues/pharmacokinetics , Kidney/chemistry , Kidney/metabolism , Limit of Detection , Linear Models , Macrolides/chemistry , Macrolides/pharmacokinetics , Meat/analysis , Muscle, Skeletal/chemistry , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results , Sheep , Tissue DistributionABSTRACT
El control de los pequeños estróngilos de los equinos (grupo Ciatostoma) se basa casi exclusivamente en la aplicación de antihelmínticos. En nuestro país, el desarrollo de resistencia generalizada a los bencimidazoles, está limitando las alternativas químicas disponibles a las lactonas macrocíclicas (ivermectina y moxidectina) y al pirantel, consideradas como drogas de larga y corta acción respectivamente. La información actualizada sobre la actividad de estas drogas en el campo es crítica para determinar su eficacia y detectar el desarrollo de fenómenos de resistencia a los antihelmínticos. En los equinos el período de reaparición de huevos (PRH) luego del tratamiento es considerado como un indicador temprano de la presencia de resistencia. En el presente trabajo se evaluó la eficacia clínica y el PRH luego de tratamientos con moxidectina y pirantel en equinos adultos de cinco establecimientos de las provincias de Santa Fe y Córdoba naturalmente parasitados por pequeños estróngilos. La eficacia clínica determinada al día 15 pos tratamiento utilizando un test de reducción en el conteo de huevos, osciló entre el 99,8 y el 100% para la moxidectina y entre el 98,9 y el 98,8% para el pirantel. Por su parte en el presente estudio el PRH fue de al menos 100 días para la moxidectina y de 35 días para el pirantel. Estos resultados indican que ambas drogas se muestran activas para el control de estos nematodes y que las poblaciones estudiadas (alguna de ellas resistentes a bencimidazoles) permanecen actualmente susceptibles a la moxidectina así como al pirantel. Esta última droga es de uso limitado en nuestro país, pero su inclusión en los programas de control contra los pequeños estróngilos podría reducir la dependencia y la presión de selección sobre las lactonas macrocíclicas y contribuir a mantener la vida útil de las mismas.
The control of the small strongyles (Ciathostoma group) in horses is based on the application of anthelmintics. In our country, the development of generalized resistance to benzimidazoles is limiting the chemical alternatives available to macrocyclic lactones (ivermectin and moxidectin) and to pyrantel, considered as long-acting and short-acting drugs respectively. Updated information on the activity of these drugs in the field, is critical for determining its efficacy and detecting the development of anthelmintic resistance. In these horse nematodes the period of egg reappearance (ERP) after treatment is considered as an early indicator of the presence of resistance. The present study evaluated the clinical efficacy and ERP after moxidectin and pirantel treatments in adult horses naturally parasitized by small strongyles from five farms from Santa Fe and Córdoba provinces. Clinical efficacy determined at day 14 or 15 post treatment using a test of reduction in the egg count ranged from 98.9 to 98.8% for the pirantel and 99.8 to 100% for moxidectin. The ERP was at least 100 days for moxidectin and 35 days for the pirantel. These results indicate that both drugs are active for the control of these nematodes and that the populations studied (some of them resistant to benzimidazoles) remain currently susceptible to moxidectin as well as to pyrantel. This last drug is of limited use in Argentina, but its inclusion in the control programs against the small strongyls could reduce the dependence and the selection pressure on the macrocyclic lactones and contribute to maintain the useful life of the same ones.
ABSTRACT
The indiscriminate and continuous use of anthelmintic drugs has promoted the selection of resistant parasites population, the presence of drug residues in food products, and heavy environmental contamination. The aim of the present study was to determine the presence of antiparasitic drug residues in 42-days old lamb serum and tissues, submitted to three endoparasite control programs: preventive treatment (PT) using moxidectin (MOX) at every 28days; selective treatment (FEC) using MOX when fecal egg count was greater than or equal to 700; and selective treatment (FMC), using MOX when FAMACHA/FMC score was 3 and above. For this purpose, MOX residues were quantified in serum, muscle, fat, liver and kidney. Lambs were slaughtered when reaching 30kg of body weight, and after a 28-day MOX withdrawal period. Before slaughter, blood was collected to determine the concentration of MOX in serum. Tissues and organ samples were collected at slaughter. The quantitation of MOX residues was performed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). From the 756 tissue samples analyzed, only one sample of fat from the PT group showed residue levels (586.3µg/kg) above the maximum residue limit (MRL) of 500µg/kg. No treated lambs presented traces of MOX residues in fat and liver, suggesting possible environmental contamination. In conclusion, all weaned lambs, produced in continuous grazing and subjected to gastrointestinal parasite control programs via selective (FEC and FMC) or preventive (PT) treatment, displayed a low risk (<1%) of MOX residues above the MRL in muscle, fat, kidney, and liver.
Subject(s)
Anthelmintics/analysis , Drug Residues/analysis , Macrolides/analysis , Parasitic Diseases, Animal/drug therapy , Sheep Diseases/drug therapy , Animals , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Brazil , Female , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Male , Parasitic Diseases, Animal/parasitology , Random Allocation , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/parasitology , Time Factors , Tissue DistributionABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Onchocerca volvulus infects in excess of 15 million people. The vectors are Simulium blackflies, varieties of which differ in their ecologies, behavior and vectorial abilities. Control of the vectors and mass administrations of ivermectin have succeeded in reducing prevalences with elimination achieved in some foci, particularly in Central and southern America. In Africa, progress towards elimination has been less successful. Areas covered: Even with community directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI), control has been difficult in African areas with initial prevalences in excess of 55%, especially if only annual treatments are dispensed. This is partly attributable to insufficient coverage, but the appearance of incipiently resistant non-responding parasites and lack of attention to vector biology in modeling and planning outcomes of intervention programmes have also played their parts, with recrudescence now appearing in some treated areas. Expert commentary: The biology of onchocerciasis is complex involving different vectors with differing abilities to transmit parasites, diverse pathologies related to geographical and parasite variations and endosymbionts in both parasite and vector. Modeling to predict epidemiological and control outcomes is addressing this complexity but more attention needs to be given to the vectors' roles to further understanding of where and when control measures will succeed.