Design and implementation of continuous bed motion (CBM) in Xtrim preclinical PET scanner for whole-body Imaging: MC simulation and experimental measurements.

PURPOSE: Preclinical PET scanners often have limited axial field-of-view for whole-body (WB) scanning of the small-animal. Step-and-shoot(S&S) acquisition mode requires multiple bed positions (BPs) to cover the scan length. Alternatively, in Continuous Bed Motion(CBM) mode, data acquisition is performed while the bed is continuously moving. In this study, to reduce acquisition time and enhance image quality, the CBM acquisition protocol was optimized and implemented on the Xtrim-PET preclinical scanner for WB imaging. METHODS: The over-scan percentage(OS%) in CBM mode was optimized by Monte Carlo simulation. Bed movement speed was optimized considering ranges from 0.1 to 2.0 mm s-1, and absolute system sensitivities with the optimal OS% were calculated. The performance of the scanner in CBM mode was measured, and compared with S&S mode based on the NEMA-NU4 standard. RESULTS: The optimal trade-off between absolute sensitivity and uniformity of sensitivity profile was achieved at OS-50 %. In comparison to S&S mode with maximum ring differences (MRD) of 9 and 23, the calculated equivalent speeds in CBM(OS-50 %) mode were 0.3 and 0.14 mm s-1, respectively. In terms of data acquisition with equal sensitivity in both CBM(OS-50 %) and S&S(MRD-9) modes, the total scan time in CBM mode decreased by 25.9 %, 47.7 %, 54.7 %, and 58.2 % for scan lengths of 1 to 4 BPs, respectively. CONCLUSION: The CBM mode enhances WB PET scans for small-animals, offering rapid data acquisition, high system sensitivity, and uniform axial sensitivity, leading to improved image quality. Its efficiency and customizable scan length and bed speed make it a superior alternative.

Performance Characteristics of the NeuroEXPLORER, a Next-Generation Human Brain PET/CT Imager.

The collaboration of Yale, the University of California, Davis, and United Imaging Healthcare has successfully developed the NeuroEXPLORER, a dedicated human brain PET imager with high spatial resolution, high sensitivity, and a built-in 3-dimensional camera for markerless continuous motion tracking. It has high depth-of-interaction and time-of-flight resolutions, along with a 52.4-cm transverse field of view (FOV) and an extended axial FOV (49.5 cm) to enhance sensitivity. Here, we present the physical characterization, performance evaluation, and first human images of the NeuroEXPLORER. Methods: Measurements of spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate performance, energy and timing resolution, and image quality were performed adhering to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2018 standard. The system's performance was demonstrated through imaging studies of the Hoffman 3-dimensional brain phantom and the mini-Derenzo phantom. Initial 18F-FDG images from a healthy volunteer are presented. Results: With filtered backprojection reconstruction, the radial and tangential spatial resolutions (full width at half maximum) averaged 1.64, 2.06, and 2.51 mm, with axial resolutions of 2.73, 2.89, and 2.93 mm for radial offsets of 1, 10, and 20 cm, respectively. The average time-of-flight resolution was 236 ps, and the energy resolution was 10.5%. NEMA sensitivities were 46.0 and 47.6 kcps/MBq at the center and 10-cm offset, respectively. A sensitivity of 11.8% was achieved at the FOV center. The peak noise-equivalent count rate was 1.31 Mcps at 58.0 kBq/mL, and the scatter fraction at 5.3 kBq/mL was 36.5%. The maximum count rate error at the peak noise-equivalent count rate was less than 5%. At 3 iterations, the NEMA image-quality contrast recovery coefficients varied from 74.5% (10-mm sphere) to 92.6% (37-mm sphere), and background variability ranged from 3.1% to 1.4% at a contrast of 4.0:1. An example human brain 18F-FDG image exhibited very high resolution, capturing intricate details in the cortex and subcortical structures. Conclusion: The NeuroEXPLORER offers high sensitivity and high spatial resolution. With its long axial length, it also enables high-quality spinal cord imaging and image-derived input functions from the carotid arteries. These performance enhancements will substantially broaden the range of human brain PET paradigms, protocols, and thereby clinical research applications.

Technical NEMA NU2-2018 Performance Assessment of Time-of-Flight-Integrated Digital PET-CT System.

Aim The objective of this study includes the NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturer Association) NU2-2018 performance evaluation of the uMIvista PET-CT (positron emission tomography-computed tomography) system. Methods The latest NEMA NU2-2018 guidelines have been followed for the evaluation of performance parameters of this PET-CT scanner: axial, tangential, and radial spatial resolution, sensitivity, counting losses, scatter, randomness, random and counting loss correction, image quality, time and energy resolution, image uniformity, and image registration alignment post installation of country first uMIvista PET-CT. Results The measured NEMA sensitivity of the uMIvista PET scanner was 12.053 cps/kBq. The spatial resolutions of the PET were measured as tangential, radial, and transaxial spatial resolutions at 10 mm, with 3.01 mm, 2.95 mm, and 2.93 mm, respectively; at 100 mm, with 3.17 mm, 3.42 mm, and 3.05 mm, respectively; and at 200 mm, with 3.65 mm, 4.54 mm, and 3.17 mm, respectively, at full-width half-maximum (FWHM); while at full-width tenths-maximum (FWTM), the values at 10 mm were 5.79 mm, 5.57 mm, and 5.69 mm, respectively, and at 100 mm were 5.59 mm, 5.96 mm, and 5.91 mm, respectively. The measured time-of-flight (TOF) timing resolution was 302.294 ps and the measured energy resolution was 11.76% with FWHM and FWTM. Conclusion The NEMA NU2-2018 performances of this TOF-integrated digital PET-CT system are extremely good in all parameters.

Development of novel low-cost readout electronics for large field-of-view gamma camera detectors.

PURPOSE: Large scintillation crystals-based gamma cameras play a crucial role in nuclear medicine imaging. In this study, a large field-of-view (FOV) gamma detector consisting of 48 square PMTs developed using a new readout electronics, reducing 48 (6 × 8) analog signals to 14 (6 + 8) analog sums of each row and column, with reduced complexity and cost while preserving image quality. METHODS: All 14 analog signals were converted to digital signals using AD9257 high-speed analog to digital (ADC) converters driven by the SPARTAN-6 family of field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA) in order to calculate the signal integrals. The positioning algorithm was based on the digital correlated signal enhancement (CSE) algorithm implemented in the acquisition software. The performance characteristics of the developed gamma camera were measured using the NEMA NU 1-2018 standards. RESULTS: The measured energy resolution of the developed detector was 8.7 % at 140 keV, with an intrinsic spatial resolution of 3.9 mm. The uniformity was within 0.6 %, while the linearity was within 0.1 %. CONCLUSION: The performance evaluation demonstrated that the developed detector has suitable specifications for high-end nuclear medicine imaging.

Performance of the Iterative OSEM and HYPER Algorithm for Total-body PET at SUVmax with a Low 18F-FDG Activity, a Short Acquisition Time and Small Lesions.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this comparative investigation was to examine the qualitative attributes of image reconstructions utilizing two distinct algorithms, namely OSEM and HYPER Iterative, in total-body 18F- FDG PET/CT under various acquisition durations and injection activities. METHODS: An initial assessment was executed using a NEMA phantom to compare image quality engendered by OSEM and HYPER Iterative algorithms. Parameters such as BV, COV, and CRC were meticulously evaluated. Subsequently, a prospective cohort study was conducted on 50 patients, employing both reconstruction algorithms. The study was compartmentalized into distinct acquisition time and dosage groups. Lesions were further categorized into three size-based groups. Quantifiable metrics including SD of noise, SUVmax, SNR, and TBR were computed. Additionally, the differences in values, namely ΔSUVmax, ΔTBR, %ΔSUVmax, %ΔSD, and %ΔSNR, between OSEM and HYPER Iterative algorithms were also calculated. RESULTS: The HYPER Iterative algorithm showed reduced BV and COV compared to OSEM in the phantom study, with constant acquisition time. In the clinical study, lesion SUVmax, TBR, and SNR were significantly elevated in images reconstructed using the HYPER Iterative algorithm in comparison to those generated by OSEM (p < 0.001). Furthermore, an amplified increase in SUVmax was predominantly discernible in lesions with dimensions less than 10 mm. Metrics such as %ΔSNR and %ΔSD in HYPER Iterative exhibited improvements correlating with reduced acquisition times and dosages, wherein a more pronounced degree of enhancement was observable in both ΔSUVmax and ΔTBR. CONCLUSION: The HYPER Iterative algorithm significantly improves SUVmax and reduces noise level, with particular efficacy in lesions measuring ≤ 10 mm and under conditions of abbreviated acquisition times and lower dosages.

Impact of different reconstruction algorithms and setting parameters on radiomics features of PSMA PET images: A preliminary study.

PURPOSE: Radiomics analysis of oncologic positron emission tomography (PET) images is an area of significant activity and potential. The reproducibility of radiomics features is an important consideration for routine clinical use. This preliminary study investigates the robustness of radiomics features in PSMA-PET images across penalized-likelihood (Q.Clear) and standard ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction algorithms and their setting parameters in phantom and prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHOD: A NEMA image quality (IQ) phantom and 8 PCa patients were selected for phantom and patient analyses, respectively. PET images were reconstructed using Q.Clear (reconstruction ß-value: 100-700, at intervals of 100 for both NEMA IQ phantom and patients) and OSEM (duration: 15sec, 30sec, 1 min, 2 min, 3 min, 4 min and 5 min for NEMA phantom and duration: 30 s, 1 min and 2 min for patients) reconstruction methods. Subsequently, 129 radiomic features were extracted from the reconstructed images. The coefficient of variation (COV) of each feature across reconstruction methods and their parameters was calculated to determine feature robustness. RESULTS: The extracted radiomics features showed a different range of variability, depending on the reconstruction algorithms and setting parameters. Specifically, 23.0 % and 53.5 % of features were found as robust against ß-value variations in Q.Clear and different durations in OSEM reconstruction algorithms, respectively. Taking into account the two algorithms and their parameters, eleven features (8.5 %) showed COV ≤ 5 % and eighteen (14 %) showed 5 % 20 %. The mean COVs of the extracted radiomics features were significantly different between the two reconstruction methods (p < 0.05) except for the phantom morphological features. CONCLUSIONS: All radiomics features were affected by reconstruction methods and parameters, but features with small or very small variations are considered better candidates for reproducible quantification of either tumor or metastatic tissues in clinical trials. There is a need for standardization before the implementation of PET radiomics in clinical practice.

Application of NEMA protocols to verify GATE models based on the Digital Biograph Vision and the Biograph Vision Quadra scanners.

PURPOSE: The Monte Carlo method is an effective tool to simulate and verify PET systems. Furthermore, it can help in the design and optimization of new medical imaging devices and algorithms. In this framework, the goal of this work is to verify the GATE toolkit performance when applied to simulate two Siemens Healthineers PET scanners: a standard axial field-of-view Biograph Vision scanner and the new long axial field-of-view Biograph Vision Quadra scanner. METHODS: The simulation toolkit GATE is based on GEANT4, comprising its main functionalities and a set of domain-specific features in the field of medical physics. To accomplish our purpose, the guidelines described in the NEMA NU 2-2018 protocol are reproduced. Then the simulated results are compared to experimental data available in the literature for both PET scanners. The assessment of the models includes different studies of sensitivity, count rate performances, spatial resolution and image quality. These tests are intended to evaluate the image quality of PET devices. RESULTS: In the spatial resolution test, relative errors lower than 8% are obtained between the experiments and GATE models. The sensitivity is 17.2 cps/kBq (Vision) and 175.9 cps/kBq (Quadra), representing relative differences with the experiment of 6% and 0.3%, respectively. Deviations from peak NECR are less than 9%. In the Image Quality test, the contrast recovery coefficient for hot spheres, with 8 iterations and 5 subsets, ranges between 57-83% for Vision and 54-86% for Quadra. These values represent a maximum deviation between the simulations and the experiments of 10% for the Quadra scanner. In the case of the Vision scanner, the highest difference is observed for the 10 mm sphere (∼38%) due to the higher contrast recovery of the experiment caused by the Gibbs artifact from the use of PSF reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the simulations have provided evidence of a good agreement between the experimental data and the results obtained with GATE. Thus, this work supports the capability of this MC toolkit to accurately simulate the models of the Vision and Quadra scanners. This study has laid the basis for further research in this field and has identified several areas that could be explored.

Performance Evaluation of the uMI Panorama PET/CT System in Accordance with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2018 Standard.

The uMI Panorama is a novel PET/CT system using silicon photomultiplier and application-specific integrated circuit technologies and providing exceptional spatial and time-of-flight (TOF) resolutions. The objective of this study was to assess the physical performance of the uMI Panorama in accordance with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2018 standard. Methods: Spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate performance, accuracy, image quality, and TOF resolution were evaluated in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the NEMA NU 2-2018 standard. Energy resolution was determined using the same dataset acquired for the count rate performance evaluation. Images from a Hoffman brain phantom, a mini-Derenzo phantom, and 3 patient studies were evaluated to demonstrate system performance. Results: The transaxial spatial resolution at full width at half maximum was measured as 2.88 mm with a 1-cm offset from the center axial field of view. The sensitivity at the center axial field of view was 20.1 kcps/MBq. At an activity concentration of 73.0 kBq/mL, the peak noise-equivalent count rate (NECR) reached 576 kcps with a scatter fraction of approximately 33.2%. For activity concentrations at or below the peak NECR, the maximum relative count rate error among all slices remained consistently below 3%. When assessed using the NEMA image quality phantom, overall image contrast recovery ranged from 63.2% to 88.4%, whereas background variability ranged from 4.2% to 1.1%. TOF resolution was 189 ps at 5.3 kBq/mL and was consistently lower than 200 ps for activity concentrations at or below the peak NECR. The patient studies demonstrated that scans at 2 min/bed produced images characterized by low noise and high contrast. Clear delineation of nuclei, spinal cords, and other substructures of the brain was observed in the brain PET images. Conclusion: uMI Panorama, the world's first commercial PET system with sub-200-ps TOF resolution, demonstrated fine spatial and fast TOF resolutions, robust count rate performance, and high quantification accuracy across a wide range of activity levels. This advanced technology offers enhanced diagnostic capability for detecting small and low-contrast lesions while showing promising potential under high-count-rate imaging scenarios.

Performance characteristics of the 5-ring GE Discovery MI PET/CT scanner using AAPM TG-126 report.

AIM: To report on the performance characteristics of the 5-ring GE Discovery MI PET/CT systems using the AAPM TG-126 report and compare these results to NEMA NU 2-2012 where applicable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TG-126 testing was performed on two GE 5-Rings Discovery MI scanners. Tests performed included spatial resolution, PET/CT image-registration accuracy, sensitivity, count rate performance, accuracy of corrections, image contrast, scatter/attenuation correction, and image uniformity. All acquired data were analyzed using scanner console or free software tools as described by TG-126 and the results were then compared to published NEMA NU 2-2012 values. RESULTS: Both scanners gave similar resolution results for TG-126 and NEMA NU 2-2012 and were within manufacturer specifications. Image-registration accuracy between PET and CT using our clinical protocol showed excellent results with values ≤1 mm. Sensitivity using TG-126 was 19.43 cps/kBq while for NEMA the value was 20.73 cps/kBq. The peak noise-equivalent counting rate was 2174 kcps at 63.1 kBq/mL and is not comparable to NEMA NU 2-2012 due to differences in phantoms and methods used to measure and calculate this parameter. The accuracy of corrections for count losses for TG-126 were expressed in SUV values and found to be within 10% of the expected SUV measurement of 1. Image contrast and scatter/attenuation correction using the TG-126 method gave acceptable results. Image uniformity assessment resulted in values within the recommended ± 5% limits. CONCLUSION: These results show that the 5-ring GE Discovery MI PET/CT scanner testing using TG-126 is reproducible and has similar results to NEMA NU 2-2012 tests where applicable. We hope these results start to form the basis to compare PET/CT systems using TG-126.

Validation of a discovery MI 4-ring model according to the NEMA NU 2-2018 standards: from Monte Carlo simulations to clinical-like reconstructions.

BACKGROUND: We propose a comprehensive evaluation of a Discovery MI 4-ring (DMI) model, using a Monte Carlo simulator (GATE) and a clinical reconstruction software package (PET toolbox). The following performance characteristics were compared with actual measurements according to NEMA NU 2-2018 guidelines: system sensitivity, count losses and scatter fraction (SF), coincidence time resolution (CTR), spatial resolution (SR), and image quality (IQ). For SR and IQ tests, reconstruction of time-of-flight (TOF) simulated data was performed using the manufacturer's reconstruction software. RESULTS: Simulated prompt, random, true, scatter and noise equivalent count rates closely matched the experimental rates with maximum relative differences of 1.6%, 5.3%, 7.8%, 6.6%, and 16.5%, respectively, in a clinical range of less than 10 kBq/mL. A 3.6% maximum relative difference was found between experimental and simulated sensitivities. The simulated spatial resolution was better than the experimental one. Simulated image quality metrics were relatively close to the experimental results. CONCLUSIONS: The current model is able to reproduce the behaviour of the DMI count rates in the clinical range and generate clinical-like images with a reasonable match in terms of contrast and noise.

Setup and characterisation according to NEMA NU 4 of thephenoPET scanner, a PET system dedicated for plant sciences.

Objective.ThephenoPET system is a plant dedicated positron emission tomography (PET) scanner consisting of fully digital photo multipliers with lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate crystals and located inside a custom climate chamber. Here, we present the setup ofphenoPET, its data processing and image reconstruction together with its performance.Approach.The performance characterization follows the national electrical manufacturers association (NEMA) standard for small animal PET systems with a number of adoptions due to the vertical oriented bore of a PET for plant sciences. In addition temperature stability and spatial resolution with a hot rod phantom are addressed.Main results.The spatial resolution for a22Na point source at a radial distance of 5 mm to the center of the field-of-view (FOV) is 1.45 mm, 0.82 mm and 1.88 mm with filtered back projection in radial, tangential and axial direction, respectively. A hot rod phantom with18F gives a spatial resolution of up to 1.6 mm. The peak noise-equivalent count rates are 550 kcps @ 35.08 MBq, 308 kcps @ 33 MBq and 45 kcps @ 40.60 MBq for the mouse, rat and monkey size scatter phantoms, respectively. The scatter fractions for these phantoms are 12.63%, 22.64% and 55.90%. We observe a peak sensitivity of up to 3.6% and a total sensitivity of up toSA,tot= 2.17%. For the NEMA image quality phantom we observe a uniformity of %STD= 4.22% with ordinary Poisson maximum likelihood expectation-maximization with 52 iterations. Here, recovery coefficients of 0.12, 0.64, 0.89, 0.93 and 0.91 for 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm and 5 mm rods are obtained and spill-over ratios of 0.08 and 0.14 for the water-filled and air-filled inserts, respectively.Significance.ThephenoPET and its laboratory are now in routine operation for the administration of [11C]CO2and non-invasive measurement of transport and allocation of11C-labelled photoassimilates in plants.

SAFIR-I: first NEMA NU 4-2008-based performance characterization.

BACKGROUND: Small Animal Fast Insert for MRI detector I (SAFIR-I) is a novel Positron Emission Tomography insert for a [Formula: see text] Bruker BioSpec 70/30 Ultra Shield Refrigerated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) system. It facilitates truly simultaneous quantitative imaging in mice and rats at injected activities as high as [Formula: see text]. Exploitation of the resulting high count rates enables quick image formation at few seconds per frame. In this investigation, key performance parameters of SAFIR-I have been determined according to the evaluations outlined in the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) Standards Publication NU 4-2008 (NEMA-NU4) protocol. RESULTS: Using an energy window of 391 to [Formula: see text] and a Coincidence Timing Window of [Formula: see text], the following performance was observed: The average spatial resolution at [Formula: see text] radial offset (Full Width at Half Maximum) is [Formula: see text] when using Filtered Backprojection, 3D Reprojection reconstruction. For the mouse- and rat-like phantoms, the maximal Noise-Equivalent Count Rates (NECRs) are [Formula: see text] at the highest tested average effective concentration of [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] at the highest tested average effective concentration of [Formula: see text], respectively. The NECR peak is not yet reached for either of these cases. The peak sensitivity is [Formula: see text]. The Image Quality phantom uniformity standard deviation is [Formula: see text]. The Recovery Coefficient for the [Formula: see text] rod is [Formula: see text]. The Spill-Over Ratios are [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], for the water- and air-filled cylinder, respectively. An accuracy of [Formula: see text] was achieved for the quantitative calibration of reconstructed voxel values. CONCLUSIONS: The measured performance parameters indicate that the various design goals have been achieved. SAFIR-I offers excellent performance, especially at the high activities it was designed for. This facilitates planned experiments with fast tracer kinetics in small animals. Ways to potentially improve performance can still be explored. Simultaneously, further performance gains can be expected for a forthcoming insert featuring 2.7 times longer axial coverage named Small Animal Fast Insert for MRI detector II (SAFIR-II).

Numerical investigation reveals challenges in measuring the contrast recovery coefficients in PET.

Objective.Contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) is essential for image quality (IQ) assessment in positron emission tomography (PET), typically measured according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2 standard. This study quantifies systematic uncertainties of the CRC measurement by a numerical investigation of the effects from scanner-independent parameters like voxel size, region-of-interest (ROI) misplacement, and sphere position on the underlying image grid.Approach.CRC measurements with 2D and 3D ROIs were performed on computer-generated images of a NEMA IQ-like phantom, using voxel sizes of 1-4 mm for sphere diameters of 5-40 mm-first in absence of noise and blurring, then with simulated spatial resolution and image noise with varying noise levels. The systematic uncertainties of the CRC measurement were quantified from above variations of scanner-independent parameters. Subsampled experimental images of a NEMA IQ phantom were additionally used to investigate the impact of ROI misplacement at different noise levels.Main results.In absence of noise and blurring, systematic uncertainties were up to 28.8% and 31.0% with 2D and 3D ROIs, respectively, for the 10 mm sphere, with the highest impact from ROI misplacement. In all cases, smaller spheres showed higher uncertainties with larger voxels. Contrary to prior assumptions, the use of 3D ROIs did not exhibit less susceptibility for parameter changes. Experimental and computer-generated images both demonstrated considerable variations on individual CRC measurements when background coefficient-of-variation exceeded 20%, despite negligible effects on mean CRC.Significance.This study underscores the effect of scanner-independent parameters on reliability, reproducibility, and comparability of CRC measurements. Our findings highlight the trade-off between the benefits of smaller voxel sizes and noise-induced CRC fluctuations, which is not considered in the current version of the NEMA IQ standards. The results furthermore warrant adjustments to the standard to accommodate the advances in sensitivity and spatial resolution of current-generation PET scanners.

Performance Characteristics of a New-Generation Digital Bismuth Germanium Oxide PET/CT System, Omni Legend 32, According to NEMA NU 2-2018 Standards.

The Omni Legend 32 PET/CT system features silicon photomultiplier (SiPM)-based detectors with bismuth germanium oxide crystals and a 32-cm axial field of view (FOV). The present study aimed to determine the performance characteristics of the Omni Legend 32 PET/CT system according to National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2018 standards. Methods: The PET component of this system comprises 22 detector modules; each module contains 24 detector blocks with 72 bismuth germanium oxide crystals with a volume of 4.1 × 4.1 × 30 mm coupled to 18 SiPM devices with a 6 × 6 mm area, resulting in an axial FOV of 32 cm. The spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate performance, and image quality delivered by PET were evaluated using the NEMA NU 2-2018 standard. PET images of 2 patients were evaluated to get a visual first impression of the Omni Legend 32 PET/CT system together with Precision DL. Results: The average spatial resolution at 1, 10, and 20 cm from the central axis was 4.3, 5.3, and 6.2 mm, respectively, for filtered backprojection and 3.7, 4.3, and 5.1 mm, respectively, for ordered-subset expectation maximization. The NEMA sensitivity was 47.30 and 47.05 cps/kBq at the axial center of the FOV and at a 10-cm radial offset, respectively. The scatter fraction, count rate accuracy, and peak noise-equivalent count rates were 35.4%, 1.7%, and 501.7 kcps, respectively, at 15.7 kBq/mL. Contrast recovery for the NEMA body phantom from the smallest to the largest sphere ranged from 61.3% to 93.0%, with a background variability of 5.4%-11.7% and a lung error of 5.1% for Q.Clear (ß-value, 50). Good patient image quality was obtained with the Omni Legend 32. Conclusion: The Omni Legend 32 has class-leading sensitivity and count rates within the category of whole-body PET systems while maintaining spatial resolution broadly comparable to that of other current SiPM-based PET/CT systems. This combination of properties results in a very good image quality.

Accurate modeling and performance evaluation of a total-body pet scanner using Monte Carlo simulations.

BACKGROUND: The limited axial field-of-view (FOV) of conventional clinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanners (∼15 to 26 cm) allows detecting only 1% of all coincidence photons, hence limiting significantly their sensitivity. To overcome this limitation, the EXPLORER consortium developed the world's first total-body PET/CT scanner that significantly increased the sensitivity, thus enabling to decrease the scan duration or injected dose. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to perform and validate Monte Carlo simulations of the uEXPLORER PET scanner, which can be used to devise novel conceptual designs and geometrical configurations through obtaining features that are difficult to obtain experimentally. METHODS: The total-body uEXPLORER PET scanner was modeled using GATE Monte Carlo (MC) platform. The model was validated through comparison with experimental measurements of various performance parameters, including spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate performance, and image quality, according to NEMA-NU2 2018 standards. Furthermore, the effects of the time coincidence window and maximum ring difference on the count rate and noise equivalent count rate (NECR) were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, the validation study showed that there was a good agreement between the simulation and experimental results. The differences between the simulated and experimental total sensitivity for the NEMA and extended phantoms at the center of the FOV were 2.3% and 0.0%, respectively. The difference in peak NECR was 9.9% for the NEMA phantom and 1.0% for the extended phantom. The average bias between the simulated and experimental results of the full-width-at-half maximum (FWHM) for six different positions and three directions was 0.12 mm. The simulations showed that using a variable coincidence time window based on the maximum ring difference can reduce the effect of random coincidences and improve the NECR compared to a constant time coincidence window. The NECR corresponding to 252-ring difference was 2.11 Mcps, which is larger than the NECR corresponding to 336-ring difference (2.04 Mcps). CONCLUSION: The developed MC model of the uEXPLORER PET scanner was validated against experimental measurements and can be used for further assessment and design optimization of the scanner.

Variability in PET image quality and quantification measured with a permanently filled 68Ge-phantom: a multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated, as a snapshot, the variability in quantification and image quality (IQ) of the clinically utilized PET [18F]FDG whole-body protocols in Finland using a NEMA/IEC IQ phantom permanently filled with 68Ge. METHODS: The phantom was imaged on 14 PET-CT scanners, including a variety of models from two major vendors. The variability of the recovery coefficients (RCmax, RCmean and RCpeak) of the hot spheres as well as percent background variability (PBV), coefficient of variation of the background (COVBG) and accuracy of corrections (AOC) were studied using images from clinical and standardized protocols with 20 repeated measurements. The ranges of the RCs were also compared to the limits of the EARL 18F standards 2 accreditation (EARL2). The impact of image noise on these parameters was studied using averaged images (AVIs). RESULTS: The largest variability in RC values of the routine protocols was found for the RCmax with a range of 68% and with 10% intra-scanner variability, decreasing to 36% when excluding protocols with suspected cross-calibration failure or without point-spread-function (PSF) correction. The RC ranges of individual hot spheres in routine or standardized protocols or AVIs fulfilled the EARL2 ranges with two minor exceptions, but fulfilling the exact EARL2 limits for all hot spheres was variable. RCpeak was less dependent on averaging and reconstruction parameters than RCmax and RCmean. The PBV, COVBG and AOC varied between 2.3-11.8%, 9.6-17.8% and 4.8-32.0%, respectively, for the routine protocols. The RC ranges, PBV and COVBG were decreased when using AVIs. With AOC, when excluding routine protocols without PSF correction, the maximum value dropped to 15.5%. CONCLUSION: The maximum variability of the RC values for the [18F]FDG whole-body protocols was about 60%. The RC ranges of properly cross-calibrated scanners with PSF correction fitted to the EARL2 RC ranges for individual sphere sizes, but fulfilling the exact RC limits would have needed further optimization. RCpeak was the most robust RC measure. Besides COVBG, also RCs and PVB were sensitive to image noise.

Monte Carlo simulation of the system performance of a long axial field-of-view PET based on monolithic LYSO detectors.

BACKGROUND: In light of the milestones achieved in PET design so far, further sensitivity improvements aim to optimise factors such as the dose, throughput, and detection of small lesions. While several longer axial field-of-view (aFOV) PET systems based on pixelated detectors have been installed, continuous monolithic scintillation detectors recently gained increased attention due to their depth of interaction capability and superior intrinsic resolution. As a result, the aim of this work is to present and evaluate the performance of two long aFOV, monolithic LYSO-based PET scanner designs. METHODS: Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission (GATE) v9.1 was used to perform the simulations. Scanner designs A and B have an aFOV of 36.2 cm (7 rings) and 72.6 cm (14 rings), respectively, with 40 detector modules per ring each and a bore diameter of 70 cm. Each module is a 50 × 50 × 16 mm3 monolithic LYSO crystal. Sensitivity, noise equivalent count rate (NECR), scatter fraction, spatial resolution, and image quality tests were performed based on NEMA NU-2018 standards. RESULTS: The sensitivity of design A was calculated to be 29.2 kcps/MBq at the centre and 27 kcps/MBq at 10 cm radial offset; similarly, the sensitivity of design B was found to be 106.8 kcps/MBq and 98.3 kcps/MBq at 10 cm radial offset. NECR peaks were reached at activity concentrations beyond the range of activities used for clinical studies. In terms of spatial resolution, the values for the point sources were below 2 mm for the radial, tangential, and axial full width half maximum. The contrast recovery coefficient ranged from 53% for design B and 4:1 contrast ratio to 90% for design A and 8:1 ratio, with a reasonably low background variability. CONCLUSIONS: Longer aFOV PET designs using monolithic LYSO have superior spatial resolution compared to current pixelated total-body PET (TB-PET) scanners. These systems combine high sensitivity with improved contrast recovery.

Technical and clinical assessment of latest technology SiPM integrated digital PETCT scanner.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conduct a technical and clinical evaluation of a Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPM) integrated digital Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PETCT) Scanner using National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2- 2018 standards. METHODS: System sensitivity was measured by using a NEMA sensitivity phantom. Scatter fraction, count-rate performance, accuracy of count loss, and timing resolution were all computed. Clinical images were acquired and image quality was assessed and compared with published studies. RESULTS: At 1 cm, tangential, radial, and axial spatial resolutions were 3.02 mm, 3.02 mm, and 2.73 mm at full width half maximum (FWHM), respectively. Sensitivity at centre and 10 cm was 10.359 cps/kBq and 9.741 cps/kBq, respectively. The timing resolution was measured at 372 ps. CONCLUSION: The digital PETCT exhibits a high-spatial resolution and a superior timing resolution, which advances the diagnostic ability to detect small lesions and boosts the diagnostic confidence. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Increases clinical relevance by improving the ability to detect and differentiate tiny or low-contrast lesions without compromising radiopharmaceutical dose or overall scan time.

Performance evaluation of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL: MRI-compatible small-animal PET systems with rat-body imaging capability.

BACKGROUND: SimPET-L and SimPET-XL have recently been introduced with increased transaxial fields of view (FOV) compared with their predecessors (SimPET™ and SimPET-X), enabling whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of rats. We conducted performance evaluations of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL and rat-body imaging with SimPET-XL to demonstrate the benefits of increased axial and transaxial FOVs. PROCEDURES: The detector blocks in SimPET-L and SimPET-XL consist of two 4 × 4 silicon photomultiplier arrays coupled with 20 × 9 array lutetium oxyorthosilicate crystals. SimPET-L and SimPET-XL have an inner diameter (bore size) of 7.6 cm, and they are composed of 40 and 80 detector blocks yielding axial lengths of 5.5 and 11 cm, respectively. Each system was evaluated according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU4-2008 protocol. Rat imaging studies, such as 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET, were performed using SimPET-XL. RESULTS: The radial resolutions at the axial center measured using the filtered back projection, 3D ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM), and 3D OSEM with point spread functions correction were 1.7, 0.82, and 0.82 mm FWHM in SimPET-L and 1.7, 0.91, and 0.91 mm FWHM in SimPET-XL, respectively. The peak sensitivities of SimPET-L and SimPET-XL were 6.30% and 10.4% for an energy window of 100-900 keV and 4.44% and 7.25% for a window of 250-750 keV, respectively. The peak noise equivalent count rate with an energy window of 250-750 keV was 249 kcps at 44.9 MBq for SimPET-L and 349 kcps at 31.3 MBq for SimPET-XL. In SimPET-L, the uniformity was 4.43%, and the spill-over ratios in air- and water-filled chambers were 5.54% and 4.10%, respectively. In SimPET-XL, the uniformity was 3.89%, and the spill-over ratio in the air- and water-filled chambers were 3.56% and 3.60%. Moreover, SimPET-XL provided high-quality images of rats. CONCLUSION: SimPET-L and SimPET-XL show adequate performance compared with other SimPET systems. In addition, their large transaxial and long axial FOVs provide imaging capability for rats with high image quality.

Performance evaluation of the PennPET explorer with expanded axial coverage.

Objective.This work evaluated the updated PennPET Explorer total-body (TB) PET scanner, which was extended to 6 rings with updated readout firmware to achieve a 142 cm axial field of view (AFOV) without 7.6 cm inter-ring axial gaps.Approach.National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2018 measurements were performed with modifications including longer phantoms for sensitivity and count-rate measurements and additional positions for spatial resolution and image quality. A long uniform phantom and the clinical trials network (CTN) phantom were also used.Main results.The total sensitivity increased to 140 kcps MBq-1for a 70 cm line, a gain of 1.8x compared to the same system with axial gaps; an additional 47% increase in total counts was observed with a 142 cm line at the same activity per cm. The noise equivalent count rate (NECR) increased by 1.8x without axial gaps. The peak NECR is 1550 kcps at 25 kBq cc-1for a 140 cm phantom; due to increased randoms, the NECR is lower than with a 70 cm phantom, for which NECR is 2156 kcps cc-1at 25 kBq cc-1and continues increasing. The time-of-flight resolution is 250 ps, increasing by <10 ps at the highest activity. The axial spatial resolution degrades by 0.6 mm near the center of the AFOV, compared to 4 mm resolution near the end. The NEMA image quality phantom showed consistent contrast recovery throughout the AFOV. A long uniform phantom demonstrated axial uniformity of uptake and noise, and the CTN phantom demonstrated quantitative accuracy for both18F and89Zr.Significance. The performance evaluation of the updated PennPET Explorer demonstrates significant gains compared to conventional scanners and shows where the current NEMA standard needs to be updated for TB-PET systems. The comparisons of systems with and without inter-ring gaps demonstrate the performance trade-offs of a more cost-effective TB-PET system with incomplete detector coverage.