Cirugía de Young para el tratamiento quirúrgico de la epistaxis en telangiectasia hemorrágica hereditaria: reporte de un caso y revisión de la literatura / Young's procedure for surgical treatment of epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: A case report and literature review

La telangiectasia hemorrágica hereditaria (THH) es una displasia vascular multisistémica, de herencia autosómica dominante, caracterizada por el desarrollo de telangiectasias mucocutáneas y malformaciones arteriovenosas viscerales. El diagnóstico se realiza mediante los criterios de Curasao publicados en el año 2000 y su manejo requiere de un equipo multidisciplinario donde el rol del otorrinolaringólogo(a) es fundamental, puesto que la epistaxis se presenta en un 90%-95% de los pacientes siendo una de las primeras manifestaciones clínicas de la enfermedad y pudiendo amenazar la vida del paciente. En la literatura se describen múltiples alternativas de tratamiento médico y quirúrgico para la epistaxis, sin existir un tratamiento definitivo para la enfermedad. A continuación, presentaremos el caso de una paciente de 56 años con THH y epistaxis recurrentes severas que, tras no responder al tratamiento médico conservador y múltiples procedimientos quirúrgicos, se realizó el cierre nasal mediante el procedimiento de Young, constituyendo el primer caso reportado en nuestro país.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is a multisystemic vascular dysplasia, of autosomal dominant inheritance, characterized by the development of mucocutaneous telangiectasias and visceral arteriovenous malformations. The diagnosis is made using the Curafao criteria published in 2000 and its management requires a multidisciplinary team where the role of the ENTs is fundamental, since epistaxis occurs in 90%-95% of patients, being one of the first clinical manifestations of the disease and may threaten the life of the patient. Multiple medical and surgical treatment alternatives for epistaxis are described in the literature without a definitive treatment for the disease. Here, we present the case of a 56-year-old patient with severe recurrent HHT and epistaxis who, after not responding to the initial conservative and surgical treatments, a nasal closure was performed, using the Young's procedure, constituting the first case reported in our country.

Patient-recorded benefit from nasal closure in a Danish cohort of patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia.

BACKGROUND: Nasal closure, also known as the modified Young's procedure was introduced in Denmark in 2008, as a surgical solution to severe epistaxis in patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). The objective of this study was to report the overall satisfaction of the procedure from a patient's point of view as well as the occurrence of complications. METHODS: All the HHT patients who underwent nasal closure from 2008 to 2018 were included in the study. The patients were evaluated for postoperative complications and subjective outcome using Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). RESULTS: Ten patients were included in the study and were observed for a mean of 64 months. None of the patients was completely free of complications, and reversal was requested in a single case. Haemoglobin levels rose with an average of 2.8 g/dl. The average GBI score after surgery was 38.05. Nine of ten patients would recommend nasal closure to fellow HHT patients. CONCLUSION: Nasal closure is highly recommended among patients, but due to the rate of postoperative complications, the procedure should be reserved for a carefully selected group of HHT patients.

Nasal closure for the treatment of epistaxis secondary to hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), also known by the eponym Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome, is an autosomal dominant disorder characterised by the presence of multiple arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) affecting multiple organs. Many procedures have been used for epistaxis control in patients with this disorder. The objective of this study was to report the treatment of severe HHT-related epistaxiswith the modified Young's procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe the treatment of 4 patients with severe blood-transfusion-dependent epistaxis who underwent a modified Young's procedure in a tertiary hospital. The nasal closure was bilateral and complete in all cases. All patients were followed for 12 months or longer. RESULTS: The procedure was well tolerated and complete cessation of bleeding was achieved in all the patients. CONCLUSION: Young's technique is a safe surgical procedure, well tolerated by patients with severe epistaxis and HHT.

An evaluation of the severity and progression of epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia 1 versus hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia 2.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant vascular dysplasia whose hallmark symptom is spontaneous recurrent epistaxis. Two major genetic subtypes of this syndrome are HHT1 and HHT2. Severity of epistaxis ranges from occasional low-volume bleeding to frequent large-volume hemorrhage. This study evaluated the severity and progression of epistaxis in HHT1 versus HHT2. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for 183 genotyped HHT patients seen at our center from 2010 to 2013. Data collected included epistaxis severity score (ESS), age of epistaxis onset, number and type of treatments, age at which treatments were sought, complete blood count values, ferritin, number of telangiectases, blood transfusions, iron therapy history, and patient demographics. RESULTS: 115 subjects with HHT2 were compared to 68 with HHT1. Subjects with HHT2 had a higher ESS compared to HHT1 (P = .043) and a later age of onset of epistaxis (P = .005). HHT2 subjects were more likely to use oral iron (P = .032) and were more likely to seek interventions to control their epistaxis (P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: HHT2 is associated with more severe epistaxis and a subsequent higher rate of interventions, requiring more aggressive therapy as compared to HHT1. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.