Intervenciones educativas en asma infantil: Una revisión sistemática / Educational interventions in childhood asthma: A systematic review

Objetivo: Analizar intervenciones educativas en pacientes pediátricos asmáticos para conseguir una técnica adecuada de inhalación y mejorar su automanejo. Diseño: Revisión sistemática basándose en las recomendaciones PRISMA. Fuentes de datos: Se revisaron las bases de datos PubMed, Scopus, Cuiden, Web of Science y Google académico. Selección de estudios: Se incluyeron 16 artículos publicados entre 2014-2021, con acceso a texto completo, idiomas: inglés, francés y español y población pediátrica: 0-18 años. Extracción de datos: Participaron 2.313 niños/as. Las variables analizadas fueron: nivel asistencial, tipo de intervención, realización correcta de la técnica de inhalación, seguimiento de la técnica, entrega de recomendaciones por escrito, categoría profesional-educador, variables relacionadas con la patología respiratoria, absentismo escolar, calidad de vida y costes económicos. Resultados: El nivel de atención sanitaria fue atención primaria, hospitalaria y comunitaria, donde destacaron como educadores: médicos especialistas, enfermeras y farmacéuticos. Las intervenciones educativas más prevalentes son demostración in situ y entrega de recomendaciones o intervenciones multimedia. Varios artículos reportan que no se realiza correctamente la educación en asma, otros enuncian que su técnica mejora tras la intervención, pero la mayoría de ellos resalta la importancia de una revisión periódica de la técnica. Conclusiones: Los autores refieren mejoría de la técnica de inhalación en todas ellas, así como un mayor automanejo de la enfermedad y adherencia al tratamiento. Es necesario intensificar la educación a los pacientes en el correcto manejo de los dispositivos, y el seguimiento y revisión posterior para optimizar el control de la enfermedad.(AU)

Objective: To analyze educational interventions in pediatric asthmatic patients to achieve an adequate inhalation technique and improve their self-management. Design: Systematic review based on the PRISMA recommendations. Data sources: Pubmed, Scopus, Cuiden, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were reviewed. Study selection: Sixteen articles published between 2014 and 2021 were included, with access to full text, languages: English, French and Spanish and pediatric population: 0–18 years. Data extraction: Two thousand three hundred and thirteen children were participated. The variables analyzed were: level of care, type of intervention, correct performance of the inhalation technique, follow-up of the technique, delivery of written recommendations, professional-educator category, variables related to respiratory pathology, school absenteeism, quality of life and economic costs. Results: The health care level was primary, hospital and community care, where specialist doctors, nurses and pharmacists stood out as educators. The most prevalent educational interventions are on-site demonstration and delivery of recommendations or multimedia interventions. Several articles report that asthma education is not carried out correctly, others state that their technique improves after the intervention, but most of them highlight the importance of periodic review of the technique. Conclusions: The authors report improvement in the inhalation technique in all of them, as well as greater self-management of the disease and adherence to treatment. It is necessary to intensify the education of patients in the correct handling of the devices, and the follow-up and subsequent review to optimize the control of the disease.(AU)

[Educational interventions in childhood asthma: A systematic review]. / Intervenciones educativas en asma infantil: Una revisión sistemática.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze educational interventions in pediatric asthmatic patients to achieve an adequate inhalation technique and improve their self-management. DESIGN: Systematic review based on the PRISMA recommendations. DATA SOURCES: Pubmed, Scopus, Cuiden, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION: Sixteen articles published between 2014 and 2021 were included, with access to full text, languages: English, French and Spanish and pediatric population: 0-18 years. DATA EXTRACTION: Two thousand three hundred and thirteen children were participated. The variables analyzed were: level of care, type of intervention, correct performance of the inhalation technique, follow-up of the technique, delivery of written recommendations, professional-educator category, variables related to respiratory pathology, school absenteeism, quality of life and economic costs. RESULTS: The health care level was primary, hospital and community care, where specialist doctors, nurses and pharmacists stood out as educators. The most prevalent educational interventions are on-site demonstration and delivery of recommendations or multimedia interventions. Several articles report that asthma education is not carried out correctly, others state that their technique improves after the intervention, but most of them highlight the importance of periodic review of the technique. CONCLUSIONS: The authors report improvement in the inhalation technique in all of them, as well as greater self-management of the disease and adherence to treatment. It is necessary to intensify the education of patients in the correct handling of the devices, and the follow-up and subsequent review to optimize the control of the disease.

Eficacia de una intervención educativa en el manejo de un dispositivo de inhalación entre profesionales de enfermería de un servicio de urgencias / Efficacy of an educational intervention in the management of an inhalation device among nursing professionals of an emergency department

Objetivo: Explorar los errores más frecuentes de la técnica inhalatoria (pilar para el tratamiento farmacológico de las exacerbaciones de asma y/o enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica) en enfermeras de un servicio de urgencias, y evaluar la eficacia de una intervención educativa. Métodos: Estudio cuasiexperimental prospectivo, realizado en un hospital de Argentina durante 2019. Para la evaluación de enfermeras se utilizaron los pasos del Consenso Separ-Alat. La intervención educativa consistió en explicación oral y demostración visual de la técnica inhalatoria. Se realizó análisis de datos pareados, y se calcularon las frecuencias absolutas y relativas con sus respectivos intervalos de confianza de 95%. Resultados: Se incluyó una muestra consecutiva de 72 enfermeros, de los cuales el 95,83% (IC 95% 88,30-99,13) cometieron al menos un error en la evaluación basal. Los errores más frecuentes fueron la falta de indicación al paciente de espirar previo a la inhalación (83,72%), el olvido de retirar la aerocámara y repetir los pasos antes de la segunda dosis (81,40%). Tras la evaluación inmediata después de recibir la intervención educativa, el 74,42% (IC 95% 58,83-86,49) corrigió la técnica. Sin embargo, al mes el 53,49% (23/43; IC 95% 37,66-68,86) realizaba la técnica correctamente. Conclusiones: La intervención educativa puede ser eficaz para subsanar errores en esta práctica, aunque sus efectos tienden a extinguirse con el tiempo. Por ende, consideramos relevante la educación periódica y sistemática para mantener una técnica de inhalación correcta entre los profesionales.(AU)

Objetive: To explore the most frequent errors of the inhalation technique (main topic for the pharmacological treatment of exacerbations of asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) in the nursing staff of an emergency department, and to evaluate the efficacy of an educational intervention. Methods: Prospective quasi-experimental study, carried out in a hospital in Argentina during 2019. For the evaluation of the nursing staff, the steps of the Separ-Alat Consensus were used. The educational intervention consisted of oral explanation and visual demonstration of the inhalation technique. Paired data analysis was performed, and absolute and relative frequencies were calculated with their respective 95% confidence intervals. Results: A consecutive sample of 72 nurses was included, of which 95.83% (95% CI 88.30-99.13) made at least one error in the baseline assessment. The most frequent errors were the lack of indication to the patient to exhale prior to inhalation (83.72%), forgetting to remove the air chamber and repeat the steps before the second dose (81.40%). After immediate evaluation after receiving the educational intervention, 74.42% (95% CI 58.83-86.49) corrected the technique. However, at one month, 53.49% (23/43; 95% CI 37.66-68.86) performed the technique correctly. Conclusions: The educational intervention could be effective in correcting errors in this practice, although its effects tend to fade over time. Therefore, we consider periodic and systematic education relevant to maintain a correct inhalation technique among professionals.(AU)

Efficacy of an educational intervention in the management of an inhalation device among nursing professionals of an emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the most frequent errors of the inhalation technique (main topic for the pharmacological treatment of exacerbations of asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) in the nursing staff of an emergency department, and to evaluate the efficacy of an educational intervention. METHODS: Prospective quasi-experimental study, carried out in a hospital in Argentina during 2019. For the evaluation of the nursing staff, the steps of the Separ-Alat Consensus were used. The educational intervention consisted of oral explanation and visual demonstration of the inhalation technique. Paired data analysis was performed, and absolute and relative frequencies were calculated with their respective 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A consecutive sample of 72 nurses was included, of which 95.83% (95%CI 88.30-99.13) made at least one error in the baseline assessment. The most frequent errors were the lack of indication to the patient to exhale prior to inhalation (83.72%), forgetting to remove the air chamber and repeat the steps before the second dose (81.40%). After immediate evaluation after receiving the educational intervention, 74.42% (95%CI 58.83-86.49) corrected the technique. However, at one month, 53.49% (23/43; 95%CI 37.66-68.86) performed the technique correctly. CONCLUSIONS: The educational intervention could be effective in correcting errors in this practice, although its effects tend to fade over time. Therefore, we consider periodic and systematic education relevant to maintain a correct inhalation technique among professionals.

Environmental impact of inhaler devices on respiratory care: a narrative review / Impacto ambiental dos dispositivos inalatórios nos cuidados respiratórios: uma revisão narrativa

ABSTRACT Climate change is a huge and present threat to human health. This article aims to deepen the knowledge about the environmental impact of inhaler devices on their carbon footprint for patients and health professionals, providing information that allows a better choice of the type of device to be prescribed for the treatment of asthma and COPD. This narrative and nonsystematic review was carried out by searching databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, SciELO, and EMBASE) for articles published between 2017 and 2022, written in Portuguese or in English, using the search words "inhalation device" OR "environmental." The review showed that global warming cannot be addressed by focusing only on inhaler devices. However, the devices that we use to treat respiratory diseases such as asthma and COPD, which are diseases that are aggravated by climate change, are also causing that change. Therefore, health professionals, patient organizations, and industries should take a lead in health policies to offer affordable alternatives to inhalers containing hydrofluoroalkane.

RESUMO As mudanças climáticas são uma ameaça enorme e presente para a saúde humana. Este artigo visa aprofundar o conhecimento sobre o impacto ambiental dos dispositivos inalatórios na pegada de carbono para pacientes e profissionais de saúde, fornecendo informações que permitem uma melhor escolha do tipo de dispositivo a ser prescrito para o tratamento da asma e da DPOC. Esta revisão narrativa e não sistemática foi realizada por meio de busca nas bases de dados PubMed, Google Acadêmico, SciELO e EMBASE de artigos publicados entre 2017 e 2022, escritos em português ou inglês, utilizando as palavras de busca "inhalation device" OR "environmental". A revisão mostrou que o aquecimento global não pode ser abordado com foco em dispositivos inalatórios apenas. No entanto, os dispositivos que utilizamos para tratar doenças respiratórias como asma e DPOC, que são doenças agravadas pelas mudanças climáticas, também estão causando essa mudança. Portanto, profissionais de saúde, organizações de pacientes e indústrias devem assumir a liderança nas políticas de saúde para oferecer alternativas acessíveis aos inaladores contendo hidrofluoralcano.

Nivel de adhesión y prevalencia a inhaladores en pacientes ambulatorios con Asma y Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica / Level of inhaler adhesion and prevalence in outpatients with Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

INTRODUCCIÓN. Para el tratamiento farmacoterapéutico de enfermedades respi-ratorias, el uso de herramientas para abordar la vía inhalatoria es de elección por su mayor eficacia y menos efectos secundarios; registrar su adhesión y prevalencia es importante. OBJETIVO. Determinar el nivel y la prevalencia de adhesión al uso de inhaladores en pacientes con Asma y Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Cróni-ca. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS. Estudio analítico transversal. Población de 215 y muestra de 121 Historias Clínicas. Se aplicó el Test de Adhesión a Inhaladores, que consistió en dos cuestionarios complementarios: el de 10 ítems, que valoró el nivel de adhesión, y el de 12 que identificó el tipo de incumplimiento en pacientes de Consulta Externa de la Unidad Técnica de Neumología del Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín, periodo julio 2018 - enero 2019. La tabulación y análisis de datos se realizó con el programa Excel. RESULTADOS. La prevalencia de mala adhesión en asmáticos fue de 83,33% y en Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica 13,33%. En cuanto al sexo, la prevalencia de mala adhesión fue de 15,28% en hombres y de 40,82% en mujeres, con una p<0,05. No se encontró diferencia significativa respecto a los niveles de instrucción. CONCLUSIÓN. La prevalencia de mala adhesión al uso de inhaladores en pacientes con Asma y Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica fue alta sobre todo en los asmáticos.

INTRODUCTION. For respiratory diseases and their pharmacotherapeutic treatment, the use of tools to address the inhalation route is chosen due to its greater efficacy and fewer secondary effects; then record the adherence and prevalence is important. OBJECTIVE. To determine both level and prevalence of adherence to the use of inhalers in patients with Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. MATE-RIALS AND METHODS. Cross-sectional analytical study. Population of 215 and sam-ple of 121 patients. The Inhaler Adherence Test was applied, which consisted of two complementary questionnaires: a 10-item questionnaire, which assessed the level of adherence, and a 12-item questionnaire that identified the type of non-compliance in patients of the Pneumology Technical Unit of the Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín, period July 2018 - January 2019. The tabulation and data analysis was performed with Microsoft Excel program. RESULTS. The prevalence of poor ad-herence in asthmatics was 83.33% and in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease was 13.3%. Regarding gender, the prevalence of poor adherence was 15.28% in men and 40.82% in women, with a p <0.05. No significant differences were found regarding the levels of instruction. CONCLUSION. The prevalence of poor adherence to the use of inhalers in patients with Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease was high, especially in asthmatics

Asma: uso adecuado de dispositivos para inhalación / Asthma: correct use of inhalation drug-delivery devices

Resumen La terapia inhalada se considera la piedra angular del manejo del asma. Sin embargo, a pesar de ser la forma ideal de administración de estos medicamentos, solamente el 70% de los pacientes cumple el tratamiento adecuadamente y sólo del 39 al 67% de los médicos conocen y pueden explicar de forma adecuada las distintas técnicas de inhalación. La terapia inhalada tiene características muy particulares. El depósito pulmonar de un medicamento inhalado a través del tracto respiratorio es más complejo que cuando se administra por vía oral, y varía dependiendo de varios factores, tanto inherentes al medicamento como a la forma de administrarlo. Para que la terapia inhalada sea exitosa, se requiere que se generen partículas del medicamento de un tamaño apropiado que penetren más allá de la orofaringe y la laringe, y que puedan depositarse en los pulmones. Existen múltiples dispositivos para la administración de medicamentos en la vía respiratoria baja. Cada uno ha probado tener una eficacia similar, siempre y cuando se utilicen con la técnica correcta. La decisión para su uso se realiza con base en la edad del paciente, la capacidad de coordinar entre la inhalación y la activación del dispositivo y la presencia de síntomas agudos. La elección del dispositivo a utilizar siempre deberá hacerse de forma conjunta, evaluando pros y contras de cada uno de los dispositivos y siempre de forma individualizada.

Abstract Inhaled therapy is considered the cornerstone of asthma treatment. However, despite being the ideal form of drug delivery, it is recognized that only 70% of patients have an adequate attachment to their treatment and only 39-67% of physicians can explain the optimal inhaler technique. Inhaled therapy has very specific characteristics. Pulmonary deposit of an inhaled medication through the respiratory tract is more complex than when administered orally and depends on several factors inherent to both the medication and the administration. For successful inhaled therapy, the drug needs to be converted into particles of an appropriate size, which can enter beyond the oropharynx and larynx, and be deposited in the lungs. There are multiple devices for the administration of drugs in the lower respiratory tract, each one with a similar efficacy as long as it is used with the correct technique. The decision of which device should be used is made based on the age of the patient, the ability to coordinate between the inhalation and activation of the device, and the presence of acute symptoms. The choice of the device must be evaluated individually.

Asma: uso adecuado de dispositivos para inhalación.

Inhaled therapy is considered the cornerstone of asthma treatment. However, despite being the ideal form of drug delivery, it is recognized that only 70% of patients have an adequate attachment to their treatment and only 39-67% of physicians can explain the optimal inhaler technique. Inhaled therapy has very specific characteristics. Pulmonary deposit of an inhaled medication through the respiratory tract is more complex than when administered orally and depends on several factors inherent to both the medication and the administration. For successful inhaled therapy, the drug needs to be converted into particles of an appropriate size, which can enter beyond the oropharynx and larynx, and be deposited in the lungs. There are multiple devices for the administration of drugs in the lower respiratory tract, each one with a similar efficacy as long as it is used with the correct technique. The decision of which device should be used is made based on the age of the patient, the ability to coordinate between the inhalation and activation of the device, and the presence of acute symptoms. The choice of the device must be evaluated individually.

La terapia inhalada se considera la piedra angular del manejo del asma. Sin embargo, a pesar de ser la forma ideal de administración de estos medicamentos, solamente el 70% de los pacientes cumple el tratamiento adecuadamente y sólo del 39 al 67% de los médicos conocen y pueden explicar de forma adecuada las distintas técnicas de inhalación. La terapia inhalada tiene características muy particulares. El depósito pulmonar de un medicamento inhalado a través del tracto respiratorio es más complejo que cuando se administra por vía oral, y varía dependiendo de varios factores, tanto inherentes al medicamento como a la forma de administrarlo. Para que la terapia inhalada sea exitosa, se requiere que se generen partículas del medicamento de un tamaño apropiado que penetren más allá de la orofaringe y la laringe, y que puedan depositarse en los pulmones. Existen múltiples dispositivos para la administración de medicamentos en la vía respiratoria baja. Cada uno ha probado tener una eficacia similar, siempre y cuando se utilicen con la técnica correcta. La decisión para su uso se realiza con base en la edad del paciente, la capacidad de coordinar entre la inhalación y la activación del dispositivo y la presencia de síntomas agudos. La elección del dispositivo a utilizar siempre deberá hacerse de forma conjunta, evaluando pros y contras de cada uno de los dispositivos y siempre de forma individualizada.

Most frequent errors in inhalation technique of patients with asthma treated at a tertiary care hospital / Erros mais frequentes na técnica inalatória de pacientes com asma brônquica em tratamento em hospital terciário

ABSTRACT Objective: To demonstrate the most frequent errors in inhalation technique in patients with asthma undergoing treatment at a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of asthma patients aged 18 years or over, treated at a pulmonology outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital. The assessment of inhalation technique of users of the dry powder inhalers Aerolizer®, Aerocaps and Diskus®, or metered-dose inhalers was based on the manufacturer's instructions for use of each inhaler device. Patients demonstrated the inhalation technique with empty inhaler devices, and it was considered correct when all stages were performed properly, or when errors probably did not interfere with the treatment outcome. Results: Among 71 participants, 43 (60.5%) performed inhalation technique incorrectly. Among metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers users, inhalation technique errors were found in 84.2% and 51.9%, respectively (p=0.013). Errors were more frequent at the exhalation stage (67.4%), followed by breathing in (58.1%) and apnea (51.2%). In the group using dry powder inhalers, the most common errors occurred during exhalation and, for those using metered-dose inhalers, the most compromised stage was aspiration. Conclusion: Errors were more frequent among those using metered-dose inhalers compared with dry powder inhalers. Misconceptions are more common at the expiration stage among users of dry powder inhalers and in aspiration among those on metered-dose inhalers.

RESUMO Objetivo: Demonstrar os erros mais frequentes na técnica inalatória de pacientes com asma brônquica em tratamento em hospital terciário. Métodos: Estudo transversal, com amostra de conveniência de pacientes com asma, com 18 anos ou mais, em tratamento em ambulatório de pneumologia de um hospital terciário. A avaliação da técnica inalatória dos usuários dos dispositivos de pó seco Aerolizer ®, Aerocaps® ou Diskus®, ou de aerossóis dosimetrados teve como base as orientações da bula do fabricante de cada dispositivo inalatório. Os pacientes demonstraram a técnica inalatória com dispositivos inalatórios vazios, e ela foi considerada correta quando todas as etapas foram realizadas de forma apropriada, ou quando os equívocos provavelmente não interferiam no resultado do tratamento. Resultados: Entre os 71 participantes, 43 (60,5%) realizaram a técnica inalatória de forma incorreta. Dentre os usuários de aerossóis dosimetrados e dispositivos de pó seco, ocorreram erros de técnica inalatória em 84,2% e 51,9%, respectivamente (p=0,013). Os erros foram mais frequentes na etapa da expiração (67,4%), seguidos da aspiração (58,1%) e da apneia (51,2%). No grupo que usava dispositivos de pó seco, os erros mais comuns aconteceram na expiração e, nos que utilizavam aerossóis dosimetrados, a etapa mais comprometida foi a aspiração. Conclusão: Os erros foram mais frequentes entre os que usavam aerossóis dosimetrados em comparação com dispositivos de pó seco. Os equívocos foram mais comuns na etapa da expiração entre os usuários de dispositivos de pó seco e na aspiração entre os que usavam aerossóis dosimetrados.

Microbiological contamination of nebulizers used by cystic fibrosis patients: an underestimated problem / Contaminação microbiológica de nebulizadores usados por pacientes com fibrose cística: um problema subestimado

ABSTRACT Objective: Home nebulizers are routinely used in the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). This study aims to evaluate the contamination of nebulizers used for CF patients, that are chronically colonized by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the association of nebulizer contamination with cleaning, decontamination and drying practices. Methods: A cross-sectional, observational, multicenter study was conducted in seven CF reference centers in Brazil to obtain data from medical records, structured interviews with patients/caregivers were performed, and nebulizer's parts (interface and cup) were collected for microbiological culture. Results: overall, 77 CF patients were included. The frequency of nebulizer contamination was 71.6%. Candida spp. (52.9%), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (11.9%), non-mucoid P. aeruginosa (4.8%), Staphylococcus aureus (4.8%) and Burkholderia cepacia complex (2.4%) were the most common isolated pathogens. The frequency of nebulizers' hygiene was 97.4%, and 70.3% of patients reported cleaning, disinfection and drying the nebulizers. The use of tap water in cleaning method and outdoor drying of the parts significantly increased (9.10 times) the chance of nebulizers' contamination. Conclusion: Despite the high frequency hygiene of the nebulizers reported, the cleaning and disinfection methods used were often inadequate. A significant proportion of nebulizers was contaminated with potentially pathogenic microorganisms for CF patients. These findings support the need to include patients/caregivers in educational programs and / or new strategies for delivering inhaled antibiotics.

RESUMO Objetivo: Nebulizadores caseiros são usados rotineiramente no tratamento de pacientes com fibrose cística (FC). Este estudo objetiva avaliar a contaminação de nebulizadores utilizados por pacientes de FC que estão cronicamente colonizados por Pseudomonas aeruginosa e a associação da contaminação do nebulizador com a higienização, esterilização e método de secagem. Métodos: Um estudo transversal, observacional, multicêntrico foi conduzido em sete centros de referência de FC no Brasil para obter dados de registros médicos; foram feitas entrevistas estruturadas com os pacientes/cuidadores e partes de nebulizadores (máscara e copo) foram coletados para cultura microbiológica. Resultados: No geral, 77 pacientes com FC foram incluídos. A frequência da contaminação do nebulizador foi de 71,6%. Candida spp. (52,9%), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (11,9%), P. aeruginosa não mucoide (4,8%), Staphylococcus aureus (4,8%) e complexo Burkholderia cepacia (2.4%) foram os patógenos isolados mais comuns. A frequência de higienização dos nebulizadores foi de 97,4%, e 70,3% dos pacientes relata higienização, esterilização e secagem dos aparelhos. A lavagem com água da torneira e secagem das partes no tempo, em espaço aberto, aumentou significativamente (9 a 10 vezes) a chance de contaminação dos nebulizadores. Conclusões: Apesar dos relatos de frequente higienização dos nebulizadores, os métodos de limpeza e esterilização usados eram inadequados. Uma proporção significativa de nebulizadores foi contaminada com microrganismos potencialmente patogênicos para pacientes com FC. Estes resultados apoiam a necessidade de inclusão dos pacientes/cuidadores em programas educacionais e/ou novas estratégias para fornecimento de antibióticos inalatórios.

Hipersensibilidad a corticoides y manejo en asma severa. A propósito de un caso / Hipersensitivity to corticosteroids and management of severe bronchial asthma. Case study

Resumen Las reacciones de hipersensibilidad a corticoides son raras en la población general, se dividen en dos categorías: Inmediatas, típicamente mediadas por Inmunoglobulina E (IgE), donde se incluye la anafilaxia luego de la administración de un fármaco en un corto período. Su prevalencia descrita es de 0,3-0,5%. Otra reacción es la 'no inmediata', que se manifiesta en un tiempo mayor de una hora después de la administración del fármaco. Se revisó la literatura con el objetivo de mejorar y aclarar el tratamiento en pacientes asmáticos que poseen esta condición. Se encontró que las vías posibles para generar estas reacciones son intranasal, aerosol por inhalador, oral y parenteral. Frente a esta condición se requiere una evaluación estrecha y detallada de la historia clínica, síntomas y reacciones secundarias al fármaco sospechoso. Finalmente, al momento de elegir tipo de corticoide a usar es primordial la seguridad del paciente logrando, además, el control de la enfermedad.

Hypersensitivity reactions to corticosteroids are rare in the general population, they fall into two categories: 'immediate', typically mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE), which includes anaphylaxis after administration of a drug in a short period of time. Its reported prevalence is 0.3-0.5%. Another reaction is 'not immediate', which manifests itself in a time longer than one hour after the administration of the drug. We reviewed the literature with the aim of improving and clarifying the treatment in asthmatic patients with this condition. It was found that the possible routes to generate these reactions are intranasal, aerosol by inhaler, oral and parenteral. Facing this condition requires a close and detailed evaluation of the clinical history, symptoms and side reactions to the suspected drug. Finally, when choosing which corticosteroid to use, the patient's safety is paramount, and control of the disease is also essential.

Cigarrillos eléctrónicos: ¿Podemos recomendar su uso? / Electronic cigarettes: can we recommend its use?

Los cigarrillos electrónicos (Cig-e) son dispositivos que contienen un líquido compuesto por un solvente, saborizantes y, en la mayoría de los casos, nicotina. Este liquido, al ser calentado en el dispositivo, se vaporiza, siendo aspirado por el usuario. En los últimos años, el uso de los Cig-e ha aumentado rápidamente, especialmente entre escolares y gente joven, sin existir hasta el día de hoy evidencias ciertas sobre su seguridad y efectos a largo plazo. En este artículo revisamos la evidencia existente en cuanto a los efectos y seguridad de cada uno de los componentes de los Cig-e y analizamos sus potenciales indicaciones en distintos escenarios clínicos.

Electronic cigarettes (Cig-e) are devices that contain a liquid composed of a solvent, flavors and, in most cases, nicotine. This liquid, when heated in the device, vaporizes, being aspirated by the user. In recent years, the use of Cig-e has increased rapidly, especially among schoolchildren and young people, with no clear evidence of safety and long-term effects to date. In this article we review the existing evidence regarding the effects and safety of each of the components of Cig-e and analyze their potential indications in different clinical scenarios.

Educational interventions to improve inhaler techniques and their impact on asthma and COPD control: a pilot effectiveness-implementation trial / Educação para a melhora da técnica inalatória e seu impacto no controle da asma e DPOC: um estudo piloto de efetividade-intervenção

ABSTRACT To assess the impact that educational interventions to improve inhaler techniques have on the clinical and functional control of asthma and COPD, we evaluated 44 participants before and after such an intervention. There was a significant decrease in the number of errors, and 20 patients (46%) significantly improved their technique regarding prior exhalation and breath hold. In the asthma group, there were significant improvements in the mean FEV1, FVC, and PEF (of 6.4%, 8.6%, and 8.3% respectively). Those improvements were accompanied by improvements in Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test scores but not in Asthma Control Test scores. In the COPD group, there were no significant variations. In asthma patients, educational interventions appear to improve inhaler technique, clinical control, and functional control.

RESUMO Para avaliar o impacto do ensino da técnica inalatória no controle clínico e funcional de pacientes com asma ou DPOC, incluíram-se 44 participantes antes e após essa intervenção. Houve uma diminuição significativa no número de erros cometidos, sendo que 20 pacientes (46%) melhoraram significativamente sua técnica na expiração prévia e apneia final. No grupo asma, houve significativa melhora nas médias de FEV1 (6,4%), CVF (8,6%) e PFE (8,3%), e essa melhora correlacionou-se com os resultados no Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test, mas não com os do Asthma Control Test. No grupo DPOC, não houve variações significativas. O ensino da técnica inalatória parece melhorar seu desempenho e os controles clínico e funcional em pacientes com asma.

Resultado de un programa de rehabilitación pulmonar sobre la adherencia y la técnica inhalatoria en pacientes con enfermedad respiratoria crónica / Result of a pulmonary rehabilitation program on adherence and inhalation technique in patients with chronic respiratory disease

Introducción: Los programas de rehabilitación pulmonar deben incluir actividades educativas encaminadas a que el paciente conozca la enfermedad y reciba el adiestramiento que le permita abordar adecuadamente su tratamiento. Objetivo: Analizar la adherencia y la técnica inhalatoria en pacientes remitidos al programa de rehabilitación pulmonar de la Fundación Neumológica Colombiana y evaluar los cambios que se presentaron en éstas al finalizar el programa ambulatorio. Metodología: Estudio no experimental preprueba postprueba en pacientes mayores de 18 años. Se calificó la técnica inhalatoria utilizando la escala EDEN y la adherencia utilizando preguntas adaptadas de la escala de adherencia a la medicación de Morisky. Resultados: Se analizaron 320 pacientes; el porcentaje de pacientes que utilizaba correctamente los dispositivos inhalados al iniciar el programa de rehabilitación osciló entre 9% y19%; el error más común en todos los dispositivos fue no expulsar el aire antes de iniciar la inhalación. Después del programa de rehabilitación el porcentaje de pacientes que empleaban una técnica inhalatoria correcta fue en promedio 61% para inhaladores de dosis medida y 83% para dispositivos de polvo seco. La adherencia a los inhaladores antes del programa fue 58%, siendo descuido y olvido las principales razones que explican la no adherencia. Al finalizar el programa 86% de los pacientes eran adherentes. Conclusiones: Un porcentaje bajo de pacientes remitidos al programa de rehabilitación pulmonar aplicaba correctamente la técnica inhalatoria, la instrucción educativa dentro de un programa de rehabilitación pulmonar mejoró la técnica y la adherencia a los inhaladores en un porcentaje importante de pacientes.

Introduction: Pulmonary rehabilitation programs must include educational activities focused on the acquisition of necessary knowledge and skills to control the disease and approach treatment appropriately. Objective: To analyze treatment adherence and inhalation technique in patients referred to pulmonary rehabilitation program of Fundación Neumológica Colombiana and evaluate changes in them at the end of the outpatient program. Methodology: Pretest - posttest design in patients older than 18 years. The inhalation technique was assessed using the EDEN scale, and adherence was scored with modified questions from the Morisky medication adherence scale. Results: We analyzed 320 patients. The percentage of patients who used inhalers correctly before starting the rehabilitation program ranged between 9% and 19%; the most common mistake was not exhale the air before starting inhalation. Upon completion of the program the percentage of patients performing a correct inhalation technique ranged between 61% for metered dose inhalers to 83% for dry powder inhalers. Adherence to inhalers before the program was 58%, with neglect and forget being the main reasons encountered. It improved in 86% of evaluated patients. Conclusion: A small percentage of patients referred to pulmonary rehabilitation program applied the inhalation technique correctly; educational instruction in a pulmonary rehabilitation program improved the technique and adherence to inhalers in a significant percentage of patients.

Evaluación de la capacidad de penetración de partículas a cavidades perinasales usando el nebulizador PARI LC SPRINT® SINUS con técnica modificada en individuos sanos y portadores de rinosinusitis crónica por fibrosis quística con cirugía de cavidades perinasales / Evaluation of the penetration ability into perinasal sinuses of particles using the PARI LC SPRINT® SINUS nebulizer with a modified technique in healthy individuals and in cystic fibrosis patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with endoscopic sinus surgery

Introducción: En pacientes con rinosinusitis crónica (RSC) por fibrosis quística (FQ), los microorganismos que colonizan la vía aérea alta son los mismos que dañan el pulmón. Los tratamientos locales con nebulización de las cavidades perinasales (CPN) serían de ayuda. Objetivo: Evaluar la penetración de las partículas nebulizadas a las cavidades perinasales. Material y método: Voluntarios sanos y pacientes con RSC por FQ con cirugía endoscópica funcional (CEF). Se utilizó el nebulizador pulsátil que PARI LC SPRINT® SINUS. La penetración de partículas a las CPN se evaluó con fusión de imágenes cintigráficas SPECT y de tomografía computarizada (CT). Resultados: Se evaluaron 5 voluntarios y 2 pacientes con FQ. El procedimiento indicado por el fabricante del nebulizador fue imposible de realizar. Se modificó la forma de nebulización. Se observó solo el 9% del material nebulizado en las CPN en voluntarios y el 4% en pacientes. Una proporción importante del material nebulizado se depositó en pulmones y tubo digestivo. Conclusión: Los resultados iniciales motivaron la interrupción del estudio original considerando que sería difícil demostrar la diferencia en la efectividad del nebulizado para alcanzar las CPN entre pacientes con y sin CEF. Además, el depósito mayoritario del nebulizado fuera de las CPN, impide aclarar el valor del efecto local respecto a un posible efecto por vía general.

Introduction: In cystic fibrosis patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, the same microorganisms that colonize the upper airway are the ones who damage the lung. Local treatments by nebulization of perinasal sinuses would be helpful in these cases. Aim: To evaluate the penetration ability of nebulized particles into perinasal sinuses. Material and method: Healthy volunteers and cystic fibrosis patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with endoscopic sinus surgery had nasal nebulization using the pulsating nebulizer PARI LC Sprint® SINUS. Fusion of scintigraphic SPECT and CT images was used to evaluate the particles penetration ability into perinasal sinuses. Results: Five volunteers and 2 patients with CF were evaluated. It was not possible to perform the nebulization procedure as indicated by the manufacturer. A continous nebulization was done instead. 9% of the nebulized material was deposited in the perinasal sinuses in volunteers and 4% in patients with CF, while the rest of the particles were distributed in the body, specially in lungs and digestive tract. Conclusions: The main deposition of the nasal nebulized solution was outside the perinasal sinuses. These results led to discontinuation of the study because it would be difficult to prove a difference in the effectiveness of nebulized particles among patients with and without surgery. It also seems impossible to define the real value of local perinasal sinus therapies considering a probable systemic effect.

[Did the patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Primary Care center Anton de Borja correctly utilize inhalers?]. / ¿Utilizan correctamente los inhaladores los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica del centro de Atención Primaria Antón de Borja?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the percentage of patients with Pulmonary Obstructive Chronic Disease who doing of incorrect form the inhaler technique. METHOD: Descriptive transversal study made in the Primary Care Center "Antón de Borja" of Rubi (in Barcelona) during the period between May and December 2013, where it was studied a representative sample of 200 patients. To assess the inhaler technique was performed a personal interview with the patient in which it was requested him to carry out a demonstration of how he was using his inhaler regularly evaluating his inhaler technique by means of the regulations established by Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery. RESULTS: 43% of the patients carry out inhaler technique incorrectly. The percentage of inadequate use of inhalers of dry powder was 26%, of the pressurized cartridge 38% and the inhaler chamber 10%. 82% of patients ≥ 65 years who have prescribed a pressurized inhaler cartridge do not perform accompanied by an inhaler chamber. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of patients do not correctly carry out inhaler technique, pointing the rare use made of the inhaler chamber despite its proven efficacy and the high number of patients with pressurized inhaler cartridge. These results reflect the need for the implementation of an educational program in our Primary Care Center to teach patients to use inhaler devices.

Inaladores dosimetrados: conhecimento de técnicos e auxiliares de enfermagem de unidades pediátricas / Metered-dose inhalers: knowledge of technicians and nursing assistants in pediatric units

Objetivo: analisar o conhecimento dos técnicos e auxiliares de enfermagem de um hospital acerca da utilização dos inaladores pressurizados dosimetrados em crianças com asma nas unidades de internação pediátrica e terapia intensiva pediátrica. Materiais e métodos: estudo quantitativo, com delineamento descritivo e exploratório. A amostra foi composta por 41 técnicosauxiliares de enfermagem. Para análise dos dados, utilizaram-se métodos estatísticos e análises de frequência. Resultados: o conhecimento dos profissionais de enfermagem é fragmentado em relação ao dispositivo, principalmente no que se refere ao intervalo de tempo entre a aplicação dos jatos, higienização do espaçador e a indicação obrigatória do uso de máscara acoplada ao espaçador considerando a faixa etária. Conclusões: são necessárias capacitações periódicas sobre o tema, visto que a aerossolterapia é terapêutica padrão ouro e amplamente empregada no tratamento da asma infantil.

Objective: to examine the knowledge of technicians and nursing assistants in a hospital on the use ofpressurized metered-dose inhalers in children with asthma units of pediatric inpatient and pediatric intensive care. Materials and methods: quantitative study with descriptive and exploratory design. The sampleconsisted of 41 nursing técnicos auxiliares. For data analysis, we used statistical methods and frequencyanalysis. Results: knowledge of nursing professionals is fragmented in relation to the device, especially with regard to the time interval between the application of the jets, cleaning the spacer and the obligatory indication of the use of coupled to the spacer mask considering the age. Conclusions: regular trainings areneeded on the subject, since the aerosol therapy is the gold standard and widely used in the treatment of child hood asthma.

Nebulized therapy. SEPAR year.

Inhaled drugs are deposited directly in the respiratory tract. They therefore achieve higher concentrations with faster onset of action and fewer side effects than when used systemically. Nebulized drugs are mainly recommended for patients that require high doses of bronchodilators, when they need to inhale drugs that only exist in this form (antibiotics or dornase alfa) or when they are unable to use other inhalation devices. Technological development in recent years has led to new devices that optimize pulmonary deposits and reduce the time needed for treatment. In this review we focus solely on drugs currently used, or under investigation, for nebulization in adult patients; basically bronchodilators, inhaled steroids, antibiotics, antifungals, mucolytics and others such as anticoagulants, prostanoids and lidocaine.

Processamento de artigos para terapia ventilatória: revisão da literatura nacional / Ventilatory therapy processing supplies: a review of the Brazilian literature

Objetivo: buscar as evidências do processamento de artigos de terapia ventilatória nas publicações nacionais de Enfermagem. Método: estudo de levantamento bibliográfico, com recorte temporal de dez anos, nas bases de dados LILACS, MEDLINE, BDENF e SCIELO, em que foram analisados seis artigos científicos e 12 manuais técnicos. Resultados: tanto a literatura nacional quanto os manuais técnicos publicados recomendam, para o processamento dos artigos de assistência ventilatória, a realização da limpeza, seguida da desinfecção de alto nível pelo calor úmido em temperaturas superiores a 70 graus C, pelo período de 30 minutos; a esterilização a vapor saturada sob pressão para os artigos termorresistentes ou a esterilização à baixa temperatura para os artigos termossensíveis. Conclusão: dado o número reduzido de publicações sobre o tema, as informações colhidas nos revelam a necessidade de um melhor controle dos processos de limpeza e termodesinfecção, uma vez que as tecnologias disponíveis nos permitem chegar a um índice relevante no impacto da qualidade e da segurança do material processado.

Effect that an educational program for cystic fibrosis patients and caregivers has on the contamination of home nebulizers / Efeito de um programa de educação para cuidadores e pacientes com fibrose cística na contaminação de nebulizadores de uso domiciliar

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pathogens found in home nebulizers and in respiratory samples of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, and to evaluate the effect that a standardized instruction regarding cleaning and disinfection of nebulizers has on the frequency of nebulizer contamination. METHODS: We included 40 CF patients (22 males), all of whom used the same model of nebulizer. The median patient age was 11.2 ± 3.74 years. We collected samples from the nebulizer mouthpiece and cup, using a sterile swab moistened with sterile saline. Respiratory samples were collected by asking patients to expectorate into a sterile container or with oropharyngeal swabs after cough stimulation. Cultures were performed on selective media, and bacteria were identified by classical biochemical tests. Patients received oral and written instructions regarding the cleaning and disinfection of nebulizers. All determinations were repeated an average of two months later. RESULTS: Contamination of the nebulizer (any part) was detected in 23 cases (57.5%). The nebulizer mouthpiece and cup were found to be contaminated in 16 (40.0%) and 19 (47.5%), respectively. After the standardized instruction had been given, there was a significant decrease in the proportion of contaminated nebulizers (43.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In our sample of CF patients, nebulizer contamination was common, indicating the need for improvement in patient practices regarding the cleaning and disinfection of their nebulizers. A one-time educational intervention could have a significant positive impact. .

OBJETIVO: Descrever os patógenos encontrados nos nebulizadores de uso domiciliar e nas amostras de trato respiratório de pacientes com fibrose cística (FC) e verificar o efeito de uma instrução padronizada de higiene e desinfecção de nebulizadores na contaminação dos mesmos. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos no estudo 40 pacientes com FC (22 do sexo masculino) que utilizavam um mesmo modelo de nebulizador. A mediana de idade foi de 11,2 ± 3,74 anos. Amostras dos nebulizadores foram coletadas do bocal e do copo reservatório utilizando-se um swab estéril umedecido em solução salina estéril. As amostras de trato respiratório dos pacientes foram colhidas por expectoração em coletor estéril ou com swab de orofaringe após estímulo de tosse. As culturas foram realizadas em meios seletivos, e a identificação bacteriana foi feita através de provas bioquímicas clássicas. Instruções verbais e escritas sobre higiene e desinfecção dos nebulizadores foram ministradas. Todas as determinações foram repetidas dois meses após, em média. RESULTADOS: A contaminação de alguma parte dos nebulizadores foi observada em 23 casos (57,5%). A contaminação do bocal e do copo foi similar, em 16 (40.0%) e 19 casos (47.5%), respectivamente. Houve uma redução significativa da proporção de nebulizadores contaminados (43,5%) após a instrução padronizada. CONCLUSÕES: Nesta amostra de pacientes com FC, a contaminação dos nebulizadores foi alta, o que indica a necessidade de melhoria nas práticas de higiene e desinfecção dos nebulizadores de pacientes com FC. Uma única intervenção educacional pode ter um impacto positivo significativo. .