Does success in percutaneous nephrolithotomy depend only on stone size? Analysis of the predictive capacity for success and complications of the current nephrolithometry scoring systems and their relationship with the stone surface.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the predictive capacity of the nephrolithometry scoring systems (GSS, STONE, CROES and S-ReSC) and stone surface regarding success and complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: We studied 392 patients who had undergone PCNL in our center. Only patients with a non-contrast CT (n = 240) were finally included for analysis. The predictive capacities for success and complications of the different scoring systems were evaluated using ROC curves and their area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Regarding success, the S-ReSC system had the highest predictive capacity with an AUC of 0.681 (95% CI 0.610-0.751), followed by the CROES with 0.667 (95% CI 0.595-0.738), the STONE with 0.654 (95% CI 0.579-0.728) and finally the GSS with 0.626 (95% CI 0.555-0.698). The stone surface as a single variable had an AUC of 0.641 (95% CI 0.565-0.718). As for complications, the S-ReSC had the highest AUC with 0.664 (95% CI 0.57-0.758), followed by STONE with 0.663 (95% CI 0.572-0.755), GSS with 0.626 (95% CI 0.555).-0.698) and CROES with 0.614 (95% CI 0.518-0.7). The stone surface alone had an AUC of 0.616 (95% CI 0.522-0.715). CONCLUSION: The nephrolithometry scales analyzed show a moderate predictive capacity for success and complications in patients undergoing PCNL in our center. Moreover, stone surface as an independent variable demonstrates moderate predictive capacity for both outcomes.

Evolución y perfeccionamiento de técnicas endourológicas (urs y nlpc) sin fluoroscopia. Revisión sistemática de la literatura / Has fluoroless endourology (URS and PCNL) come of age? Evidence from a comprehensive literature review

Introducción La radiación es una herramienta fundamental en las técnicas de imagen ampliamente utilizadas en el manejo de los cálculos renales. Entre las medidas básicas que suelen adoptar los endourólogos para reducir la cantidad de exposición a la radiación, se encuentran el principio As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) —basado en reducir el uso de la radiación tanto como sea razonablemente posible— y el empleo de técnicas sin fluoroscopia. Se realizó una revisión exploratoria de la literatura para investigar el éxito y la seguridad de la ureteroscopia (URS) o la nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLPC) sin fluoroscopia para el tratamiento de los cálculos renales. Métodos Se realizó una revisión de la literatura mediante la búsqueda en las bases de datos bibliográficas PubMed, EMBASE y la biblioteca Cochrane, y se incluyeron en la revisión 14 artículos completos de acuerdo con las directrices de la declaración PRISMA. Resultados De un total de 2.535 procedimientos analizados, se realizaron 823 URS sin fluoroscopia frente a 556 URS con fluoroscopia, y 734 NLPC sin fluoroscopia frente a 277 NLPC con fluoroscopia. La tasa libre de cálculos (TLC) de la URS sin fluoroscopia frente a la guiada por fluoroscopia fue del 85,3 y el 77%, respectivamente (p=0,2), y las TLC de la NLPC sin fluoroscopia frente al grupo con fluoroscopia fueron del 83,8 y el 84,6%, respectivamente (p=0,9). Las complicaciones globales Clavien-Dindo I/II y III/IV para los procedimientos con y sin fluoroscopia fueron del 3,1 (n=71), 8,5 (n=131), 1,7 (n=23) y 3% (n=47), respectivamente. Solo 5 estudios informaron de un fracaso del abordaje realizado con fluoroscopia, con un total de 30 (1,3%) procedimientos fallidos. Conclusión Durante los últimos años han surgido diversas maneras de aplicar el protocolo ALARA en endourología en un esfuerzo por proteger tanto a los pacientes como al personal sanitario. ... (AU)

Introduction Radiation via the use of imaging is a key tool in management of kidney stones. Simple measures are largely taken by the endourologists to implement the ‘As Low As Reasonably Achievable’ (ALARA) principle, including the use of fluoroless technique. We performed a scoping literature review to investigate the success and safety of fluoroless ureteroscopy (URS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures for the treatment of KSD. Methods A literature review was performed searching bibliographic databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library, and 14 full papers were included in the review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Results Of the 2535 total procedures analysed, 823 were fluoroless URS vs. 556 fluoroscopic URS; and 734 fluoroless PCNL vs. 277 fluoroscopic PCNL. The SFR for fluoroless vs. fluoroscopic guided URS was 85.3% and 77%, respectively (P=.2), while for fluoroless PCNL vs. fluoroscopic group was 83.8% and 84.6%, respectively (P=.9). The overall Clavien-Dindo I/II and III/IV complications for fluoroless and fluoroscopic guided procedures were 3.1% (n=71) and 8.5% (n=131), and 1.7% (n=23) and 3% (n=47) respectively. Only 5 studies reported a failure of the fluoroscopic approach with a total of 30 (1.3%) failed procedures. Conclusion The ALARA protocol has been implemented in endourology in numerous ways to protect both patients and healthcare workers during recent years. Fluoroless procedures for treatment of KSD are safe and effective with outcomes comparable to standard procedures and could become the new frontier of endourology in selected cases. (AU)

Tendencias de punción extrapapilar en nefrolitotomía percutánea. Revisión de la literatura / Percutaneous nephrolithotomy non–papiilary puncture trends. A review of the literature

La nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLPC) es el tratamiento de referencia para los cálculos renales de gran tamaño. Aunque tradicionalmente la punción dirigida a la papila renal ha sido la piedra angular de este tratamiento, se han desarrollado tendencias de punción en sitios distintos de la papila renal que han despertado interés en este contexto. El objetivo de este estudio es investigar la evolución del acceso extrapapilar para la NLPC a lo largo de los años. Se realizó una revisión de la literatura y se incluyeron 13 publicaciones en el estudio. Se encontraron 2estudios experimentales que investigaban la viabilidad del acceso extrapapilar, 5estudios prospectivos de cohortes, 2retrospectivos sobre el acceso extrapapilar y 4estudios que comparaban el acceso papilar con el extrapapilar. La técnica de acceso extrapapilar ha demostrado ser una solución segura y eficaz capaz de adaptarse a las últimas tendencias endoscópicas. El uso generalizado de esta técnica es previsible en el futuro. (AU)

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard of treatment for large renal calculi. Papillary puncture is the mainstay of treatment for large renal calculi, but the non-papilary has been introduced and gained some interest. The aim of this study is the investigation of trends of non-papillary access for PCNL over the years. A review of the literature took place and 13 publications were included in the study. Two experimental studies investigating the feasibility of non-papillary access were found. Five cohort prospective and 2retrospective studies for non-papillary access and 4comparative studies between papillary and non-papillary access were included. Non papillary access is a technique that has been proved as a safe and efficient solution that keeps up with the latest endoscopic trends. A wider use of this method could be expected in the future. (AU)

¿Cómo calcular el volumen litiásico y cuál es su aplicación quirúrgica? / How to estimate stone volume and its use in stone surgery: A comprehensive review?

Objetivo Las guías actuales para el tratamiento intervencionista sugieren el diámetro acumulativo de la litiasis (DAL) como factor decisivo en la elección del tratamiento quirúrgico óptimo (ureteroscopia [URS], litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque [LEOCh] y nefrolitotomía percutánea [NLPC]). El volumen litiásico (VL) se ha introducido recientemente para obtener una estimación más precisa de la carga litiásica. El objetivo de esta revisión es resumir los métodos disponibles para calcular el VL y su aplicación quirúrgica. Material y métodos En diciembre de 2022 se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura mediante búsquedas en las bases de datos Embase, Cochrane y Pubmed. Los artículos se consideraron elegibles si describían la medición del VL o la tasa libre de litiasis (TLL) tras diferentes modalidades de tratamiento (LEOCh, URS, NLPC) o la expulsión espontánea, basándose en la medición del VL. Dos revisores evaluaron de forma independiente la elegibilidad y la calidad de los artículos y realizaron la extracción de datos. Resultados En total se incluyeron 28 estudios. Todos los estudios utilizaron diferentes técnicas para calcular el VL. La medición automática del volumen pareció ser más precisa que la estimación del volumen. Los estudios in vitro mostraron que la medición automática del volumen se ajustaba más al volumen real de la litiasis, con una menor variabilidad interobservador. A diferencia de la NLPC y la LEOCh, en la URS se observó que el VL era un mejor predictor de mejor la TLL que el diámetro litiásico mayor o el diámetro acumulativo en litiasis >20mm. Conclusiones Calcular el VL —de forma manual o automática— es factible, y probablemente se ajuste más a la carga litiásica real. Aunque en el caso de las litiasis grandes tratadas mediante cirugía intrarrenal retrógrada el VL parece predecir mejor la TLL, la superioridad del VL en todas las cargas litiásicas y para todos los tipos de tratamiento está aún por demostrar. ... (AU)

Objective Current interventional guidelines refer to the cumulative stone diameter to choose the appropriate surgical modality (ureteroscopy (URS), extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)). The stone volume (SV) has been introduced recently, to better estimate the stone burden. This review aimed to summarize the available methods to evaluate the SV and its use in urolithiasis treatment. Material and methods A comprehensive review of the literature was performed in December 2022 by searching Embase, Cochrane and Pubmed databases. Articles were considered eligible if they described SV measurement or the stone free rate after different treatment modalities (SWL, URS, PCNL) or spontaneous passage, based on SV measurement. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility and the quality of the articles and performed the data extraction. Results In total, 28 studies were included. All studies used different measurement techniques for stone volume. The automated volume measurement appeared to be more precise than the calculated volume. In vitro studies showed that the automated volume measurement was closer to actual stone volume, with a lower inter-observer variability. Regarding URS, stone volume was found to be more predictive of stone free rates as compared to maximum stone diameter or cumulative diameter for stones >20mm. This was not the case for PCNL and SWL. Conclusions Stone volume estimation is feasible, manually or automatically and is likely a better representation of the actual stone burden. While for larger stones treated by retrograde intrarenal surgery, stone volume appears to be a better predictor of SFR, the superiority of stone volume throughout all stone burdens and for all stone treatments, remains to be proven. Automated volume acquisition is more precise and reproducible than calculated volume. (AU)

How to estimate stone volume and its use in stone surgery: a comprehensive review.

OBJECTIVE: Current interventional guidelines refer to the cumulative stone diameter to choose the appropriate surgical modality (ureteroscopy [URS], extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy [ESWL] and percutaneous nephrolithotomy [PCNL]). The stone volume (SV) has been introduced recently, to better estimate the stone burden. This review aimed to summarize the available methods to evaluate the SV and its use in urolithiasis treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed in December 2022 by searching Embase, Cochrane and Pubmed databases. Articles were considered eligible if they described SV measurement or the stone free rate after different treatment modalities (SWL, URS, PCNL) or spontaneous passage, based on SV measurement. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility and the quality of the articles and performed the data extraction. RESULTS: In total, 28 studies were included. All studies used different measurement techniques for stone volume. The automated volume measurement appeared to be more precise than the calculated volume. In vitro studies showed that the automated volume measurement was closer to actual stone volume, with a lower inter-observer variability. Regarding URS, stone volume was found to be more predictive of stone free rates as compared to maximum stone diameter or cumulative diameter for stones >20 mm. This was not the case for PCNL and SWL. CONCLUSIONS: Stone volume estimation is feasible, manually or automatically and is likely a better representation of the actual stone burden. While for larger stones treated by retrograde intrarenal surgery, stone volume appears to be a better predictor of SFR, the superiority of stone volume throughout all stone burdens and for all stone treatments, remains to be proven. Automated volume acquisition is more precise and reproducible than calculated volume.

Has fluoroless endourology (URS and PCNL) come of age? Evidence from a comprehensive literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation via the use of imaging is a key tool in management of kidney stones. Simple measures are largely taken by the endourologists to implement the 'As Low As Reasonably Achievable' (ALARA) principle, including the use of fluoroless technique. We performed a scoping literature review to investigate the success and safety of fluoroless ureteroscopy (URS) or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures for the treatment of KSD. METHODS: A literature review was performed searching bibliographic databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library, and 14 full papers were included in the review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 2535 total procedures analysed, 823 were fluoroless URS vs. 556 fluoroscopic URS; and 734 fluoroless PCNL vs. 277 fluoroscopic PCNL. The SFR for fluoroless vs. fluoroscopic guided URS was 85.3% and 77%, respectively (p=0.2), while for fluoroless PCNL vs. fluoroscopic group was 83.8% and 84.6%, respectively (p=0.9). The overall Clavien-Dindo I/II and III/IV complications for fluoroless and fluoroscopic guided procedures were 3.1% (n=71) and 8.5% (n=131), and 1.7% (n=23) and 3% (n=47) respectively. Only 5 studies reported a failure of the fluoroscopic approach with a total of 30 (1.3%) failed procedures. CONCLUSION: The ALARA protocol has been implemented in endourology in numerous ways to protect both patients and healthcare workers during recent years. Fluoroless procedures for treatment of KSD are safe and effective with outcomes comparable to standard procedures and could become the new frontier of endourology in selected cases.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy non-papillary puncture trends. A review of the literature.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard of treatment for large renal calculi. Papillary puncture is the mainstay of treatment for large renal calculi, but the non-papillary has been introduced and gained some interest. The aim of this study is the investigation of trends of non-papillary access for PCNL over the years. A review of the literature took place and 13 publications were included in the study. Two experimental studies investigating the feasibility of non-papillary access were found. Five cohort prospective and 2 retrospective studies for non-papillary access and 4 comparative studies between papillary and non-papillary access were included. Non papillary access is a technique that has been proved as a safe and efficient solution that keeps up with the latest endoscopic trends. A wider use of this method could be expected in the future.

Uso de vaina asistida por vacío en mininefrolitotomía percutánea (mini-NLPC) en decúbito supino / Vacuum-assisted access sheath in supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL)

Introducción La vaina de acceso asistida por vacío es un nuevo dispositivo para el tratamiento de los cálculos renales mediante nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLPC). Objetivo Nuestro objetivo fue comparar la tasa libre de litiasis (TLL) y las complicaciones entre la mini-NLPC estándar y la asistida por vacío (VaNLPC). Método Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes intervenidos mediante mini-NLPC y VaNLPC desde enero de 2018 hasta junio de 2022. La VaNLPC se realizó con una vaina desechable (ClearPetra®) que permite la conexión de aspiración por un canal lateral facilitando la extracción de fragmentos. Se recogieron las características basales de los pacientes, los resultados quirúrgicos y los datos perioperatorios y postoperatorios. Se compararon en cuanto a las complicaciones y la TLL. Resultados Identificamos 136 pacientes, 57 (41,9%) intervenidos con VaNLPC y 79 (58,15%) con mini-NLPC. El tiempo quirúrgico medio fue significativamente menor en el grupo VaNLPC (95 min) que en el mini-NLPC (146 min; p = 0,001). La técnica tubeless se realizó con mayor frecuencia en el grupo VaNLPC (61,4 vs. 34,2%; p = 0,002). No se observaron diferencias en las complicaciones postoperatorias. El tiempo medio de hospitalización fue significativamente inferior en el grupo VaNLPC con 1,7 días por paciente frente a 2,7 días en el grupo mini-NLPC (p = 0,001). No hubo diferencias en la TLL a los tres meses entre VaNLPC (71,9%) y mini-NLPC (71,8%; p = 0,848). Conclusiones Los pacientes tratados con VaNLPC obtuvieron resultados comparables a la mini-NLPC, mostrando una TLL igual con similares complicaciones infecciosas. Como potenciales beneficios de la VaNLPC, se postulan menor tiempo quirúrgico y estancia postoperatoria. (AU)

Introduction The vacuum-assisted access sheath is a new device for the treatment of kidney stones with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Objective Our aim was to compare the stone-free rate (SFR) and complications between standard mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and vacuum-assisted PCNL (Va-PCNL). Methods Retrospective study of patients undergoing mini-PCNL and Va-PCNL from January 2018 to June 2022. Va-PCNL was performed with a disposable sheath (ClearPetra) with continuous high-flow irrigation and vacuum fluid dynamics for easier stone fragment removal. Baseline patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, perioperative and postoperative data were collected. We compared SFR and complications. Results A total of 136 patients were identified, 57 (41,9%) underwent Va-PCNL and 79 (58,15%) mini-PCNL. Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Va-PCNL group (95 min.) than in mini-PCNL (146 min.; P = .001) group. The tubeless technique was performed more frequently in Va-PCNL group (61,4% vs. 34,2%; P = .002). We did not observe any differences in postoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was significantly lower in Va-PCNL with 1,7 ± 1,9 days per patient compared with 2,7 ± 1,5 days in the mini-PCNL group (P = .001). There were no differences in SFR at 3 months between Va-PCNL (71,9%) and mini-PCNL (71,8%; P = .848). Conclusion Patients treated with Va-PCNL had comparable results to mini-PCNL, showing equal SFR with similar infectious complications rates. Potential benefits of Va-PCNL include shorter operative time and postoperative stay. (AU)

Comparación de los resultados hemodinámicos y respiratorios entre dos posiciones quirúrgicas para la nefrolitotomía percutánea: ensayo clínico prospectivo y aleatorizado / Comparison of hemodynamic and respiratory outcomes between two surgical positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective, randomized clinical trial

Introducción La nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLPC) se ha consolidado como el gold standard en el tratamiento de cálculos renales de gran tamaño y complejidad. Objetivos El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la eficacia y la seguridad de la NLPC realizada en pacientes en posición de decúbito lateral frente a decúbito prono. Métodos En nuestro ensayo prospectivo aleatorizado, 60 pacientes programados para NLPC guiada por fluoroscopia y ecografía en decúbito prono o lateral se dividieron en dos grupos. Se compararon las características demográficas, los parámetros hemodinámicos, respiratorios y metabólicos, las puntuaciones de dolor postoperatorio, la necesidad de analgésicos, la cantidad de líquido administrado, la pérdida de sangre y las transfusiones, el tiempo quirúrgico y la estancia hospitalaria, y las complicaciones perioperatorias. Resultados Se determinó que la PaO2, la SaO2, la SpO2 y el índice de reserva de oxígeno (ORi) en el minuto60 del procedimiento y en el periodo postoperatorio, el índice de variabilidad pletismográfica (PVi) en el minuto60, la presión de distensión en todos los periodos de tiempo y el volumen del sangrado durante la intervención fueron superiores en el grupo de decúbito prono, de forma estadísticamente significativa. No hubo diferencias entre los grupos en cuanto a otros parámetros. Conclusiones Según nuestros resultados, la posición de decúbito lateral puede ser de preferencia en los procedimientos de NLPC, teniendo en cuenta que esta debe elegirse con base en la experiencia del cirujano, las características anatómicas y fisiológicas del paciente, los efectos positivos sobre los parámetros respiratorios y el sangrado, y que el tiempo quirúrgico puede disminuir al aumentar la experiencia (AU)

Introduction Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has become the gold standard for the treatment of large and complex kidney stones. Objectives The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCNL for patients in the flank position versus prone position. Methods In our prospective randomized trial, 60 patients who would undergo fluoroscopy and ultrasound-guided PCNL in prone or flank position were divided into two groups. Demographic features, hemodynamics, respiratory and metabolic parameters, postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements, amount of fluid given, blood loss and transfusion, duration of operation and hospital stay, and perioperative complications were compared. Results PaO2, SaO2, SpO2 and oxygen reserve index (ORi) at the 60th minute of the operation and in the postoperative period, pleth variability index (PVi) at the 60th minute of the operation, driving pressure in all time periods and the amount of bleeding during the operation were determined to be statistically significantly higher in the prone group. There was no difference between the groups in terms of other parameters. Was found to be statistically significantly higher in the prone group. Conclusions Due to our results the flank position can be preferred in PCNL operations, considering that the position should be chosen according to the surgeon's experience, the patient's anatomical and physiological data, positive effects on respiratory parameters and bleeding, and the operation time can be shortened as the experience increases (AU)

Implantación de un programa de mininefrolitotomía percutánea ambulatoria: presentación del protocolo y resultados iniciales / Initial results of the implementation of an ambulatory mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy program

Objetivo Presentar nuestro protocolo de nefrolitotomía percutánea ambulatoria y evaluar los resultados iniciales del programa. Material y métodos Se analiza la implantación clínica del protocolo con los 30 primeros casos de mininefrolitotomía percutánea ambulatoria realizados en nuestro centro entre abril de 2021 y septiembre de 2022. Se recogen datos demográficos, variables perioperatorias, complicaciones y necesidad de atención médica no planificada, stone-free rate, tipología litiásica y parámetros de satisfacción con el proceso de cirugía mayor ambulatoria. Resultados Con una edad media de 60,2±11,6 años se intervinieron un total de 30 pacientes que cumplían los criterios de inclusión. El tamaño medio de la litiasis fue de 15mm [rango: 5-20]. No se registró ninguna complicación intraoperatoria. Todos los pacientes excepto uno fueron dados de alta el mismo día de la intervención, según lo planificado. El mes posterior al alta, la tasa de complicaciones, reconsulta a urgencias o reingreso hospitalario ha sido del 0%. La stone-free rate a los 3 meses ha sido del 83%. La satisfacción global de todo el proceso perioperatorio, valorada a través del cuestionario EVAN-G, fue de 124,3 puntos sobre un máximo de 150, equivalente a un 78,6% de grado de satisfacción. Conclusión La mininefrolitotomía percutánea en régimen ambulatorio puede instaurarse como una opción de asistencia en centros con experiencia en endourología, una unidad establecida de cirugía mayor ambulatoria y mediante una selección estricta de los pacientes. Nuestros resultados iniciales muestran un perfil de seguridad adecuado y un grado de satisfacción global elevado de los pacientes intervenidos en esta modalidad (AU)

Objective To present our program for ambulatory mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and evaluate its initial results. Material and methods We analyzed the implementation of the protocol into the clinical practice with the first 30 outpatient mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy cases performed in our center between April 2021 and September 2022. Demographic characteristics, perioperative variables, complications and need for unplanned health care, stone-free rate, stone type and patient satisfaction with the major ambulatory surgery process were collected. Results A total of 30 patients with a mean age of 60.2±11.6 years who met the inclusion criteria underwent surgery. The mean stone size was 15mm [range: 5-20]. No intraoperative complications were recorded. All patients except one were discharged the same day of surgery as planned. In the month following discharge, the rate of complications, emergency department revisits or hospital readmissions rates were 0%. Stone-free-rate at 3 months was 83%. Overall satisfaction with the whole perioperative process was assessed with the EVAN-G questionnaire, obtaining 124.3 points out of a maximum of 150, which is equivalent to a 78.6% level of satisfaction. Conclusion Ambulatory mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy can be implemented as a treatment option in centers with experience in endourology, an established major ambulatory surgery unit, and strictly selected patients. Our initial results show an adequate safety profile and high overall satisfaction perceived by patients undergoing the ambulatory approach (AU)

Vacuum-assisted access sheath in supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL).

INTRODUCTION: The vacuum-assisted access sheath is a new device for the treatment of kidney stones with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the stone-free rate (SFR) and complications between standard mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) and vacuum-assisted PCNL (Va-PCNL). METHODS: Retrospective study of patients undergoing Mini-PCNL and Va-PCNL from January 2018 to June 2022. Va-PCNL was performed with a disposable sheath (ClearPetra®) with continuous high-flow irrigation and vacuum fluid dynamics for easier stone fragment removal. Baseline patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, perioperative and postoperative data were collected. We compared SFR and complications. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were identified, 57 (41,9%) underwent Va-PCNL and 79 (58,15%) Mini-PCNL. Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Va-PCNL group (95 min.) than in Mini-PCNL (146 min; P = ,001) group. The tubeless technique was performed more frequently in Va-PCNL group (61,4% vs. 34,2%; P = ,002). We did not observe any differences in postoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was significantly lower in Va-PCNL with 1,7 ± 1,9 days per patient compared with 2,7 ± 1,5 days in the Mini-PCNL group (P = ,001). There were no differences in SFR at 3 months between Va-PCNL (71,9%) and Mini-PCNL (71,8%; P =v ,848). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with Va-PCNL had comparable results to Mini-PCNL, showing equal SFR with similar infectious complications rates. Potential benefits of Va-PCNL include shorter operative time and postoperative stay.

Initial results of the implementation of an ambulatory mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy program.

OBJECTIVE: To present our program for ambulatory mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and evaluate its initial results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed the implementation of the protocol into the clinical practice with the first 30 outpatient mini-PCNL cases performed in our center between April 2021 and September 2022. Demographic characteristics, perioperative variables, complications and need for unplanned health care, stone-free rate (SFR), stone type and patient satisfaction with the major ambulatory surgery (MAS) process were collected. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients with a mean age of 60.2 ±â€¯11.6 years who met the inclusion criteria underwent surgery. The mean stone size was 15 mm [range: 5-20]. No intraoperative complications were recorded. All patients except one were discharged the same day of surgery as planned. In the month following discharge, the rate of complications, emergency department (ED) revisits or hospital readmissions rates were 0%. Stone-free-rate (SFR) at 3 months was 83%. Overall satisfaction with the whole perioperative process was assessed with the EVAN-G questionnaire, obtaining 124.3 points out of a maximum of 150, which is equivalent to a 78.6% level of satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory mini-PCNL can be implemented as a treatment option in centers with experience in endourology, an established MAS Unit, and strictly selected patients. Our initial results show an adequate safety profile and high overall satisfaction perceived by patients undergoing the ambulatory approach.

Initial results of endourological treatment of renoureteral lithiasis by means of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous surgery in an outpatient procedure in a tertiary care center.

OBJECTIVE: Urinary lithiasis is a prevalent disease with a high socioeconomic impact, where endourological surgery has shown excellent results with minimal complications. For its part, outpatient surgery is an efficient, safe and quality care model. We present our experience in the outpatient endourological treatment of lithiasis and a review of the main series. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective analysis of 85 flexible or percutaneous procedures for the treatment of lithiasis, carried out in our center between January 2021 and April 2022. The main objective was to analyze the rate of unplanned admission and the success and incidence of complications as secondary objectives. The patients were selected following the inclusion criteria of the care process. RESULTS: The mean age was 56 ± 14 years. Urine culture was positive in 13.9% of the patients, 38% had a pre-surgical double-J catheter. Median stone surface was 55 mm 2 (961 ± 323 Hounsfield Units). 73 flexible and 12 percutaneous procedures were performed. 8 patients required immediate unplanned admission and another 2 during the first month. 94% were stone-free at the third month. No intraoperative complications were detected, although 16.5% of the patients presented some type of postoperative complication. CONCLUSION: In our experience, with a strict selection of patients and following a care process with multidisciplinary participation, endourological procedures are feasible and safe in the outpatient setting. Periodic monitoring of the results is essential for the sake of a constant improvement of the process.

Comparison of hemodynamic and respiratory outcomes between two surgical positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has become the gold standard for the treatment of large and complex kidney stones. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for patients in the flank position versus prone position. METHODS: In our prospective randomized trial, 60 patients who would undergo fluoroscopy and ultrasound-guided PCNL in prone or flank position were divided into two groups. Demographic features, hemodynamics, respiratory and metabolic parameters, postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements, amount of fluid given, blood loss and transfusion, duration of operation and hospital stay, and perioperative complications were compared. RESULTS: PaO2, SaO2, SpO2 and Oxygen Reserve Index (ORi) at the 60th minute of the operation and in the postoperative period, Pleth Variability index (PVi) at the 60th minute of the operation, driving pressure in all time periods and the amount of bleeding during the operation were determined to be statistically significantly higher in the prone group. There was no difference between the groups in terms of other parameters. Was found to be statistically significantly higher in the prone group. CONCLUSIONS: Due to our results the flank position can be preferred in PCNL operations, considering that the position should be chosen according to the surgeon's experience, the patient's anatomical and physiological data, positive effects on respiratory parameters and bleeding, and the operation time can be shortened as the experience increases.

Comparación entre el efecto de la nefrolitotomía percutánea miniaturizada vs. convencional en la función renal evaluada mediante gammagrafía renal con DMSA / Comparison of the effect of miniaturized and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function assessed with DMSA scintigraphy

Introducción y objetivos Nos propusimos realizar un estudio clínico para comparar los efectos de la nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLP) convencional y miniaturizada sobre la función renal evaluada mediante imágenes de gammagrafía en pacientes con cálculos renales primarios. Materiales y métodos Se incluyeron 104 pacientes en este estudio prospectivo entre mayo de 2014 y febrero de 2017. Los pacientes elegibles se dividieron en dos grupos: NLP miniaturizada (NLPm) y NLP convencional (NLPc) mediante muestras emparejadas (escenario 1:1). Se realizó una gammagrafía cortical con ácido dimercaptosuccínico de tecnecio-99m antes y después de la intervención. Resultados No hubo diferencias entre los dos grupos en cuanto a las tasas de éxito (NLPm [63,5%] frente a NLPc [71,2%], p=0,403), creatinina sérica, tasa de filtración glomerular, funciones renales diferenciales evaluadas antes y después de la intervención (p≥0,05). No hubo relación entre el tipo de procedimiento y la formación de nuevo tejido cicatricial (p=0,780). Las tasas de complicaciones graves (grados 3 y 4 según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo modificada) fueron más altas en la NLPc (p=0,034). La carga litiásica, el tiempo quirúrgico, el descenso de la hemoglobina, los accesos múltiples, la transfusión de sangre y la angioembolización fueron mayores en los pacientes con riñones cicatrizados (p<0,001, p=0,008, p=0,004, p<0,001, p=0,003, p=0,001, respectivamente). En el análisis multivariante, sólo el acceso múltiple resultó estadísticamente significativo para predecir la formación de tejido cicatricial nuevo (p<0,001, OR: 24,28). Conclusiones La NLP miniaturizada y la convencional son intervenciones fiables y efectivas para el tratamiento de cálculos renales de gran tamaño. No se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los dos procedimientos en cuanto a la disminución de la función renal (AU)

Introduction and Objectives We aimed to present a clinical study that compares standard and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) effects on kidney function with scintigraphic imaging in primary kidney stone patients. Materials and Methods One hundred four patients were included in this prospective study between May 2014 and February 2017. Eligible patients were divided into two groups miniaturized PNL (mPNL) and standard PNL (sPNL) with matched-pair analysis (1:1 scenario). Technetium-99m Dimercaptosuccinic Acid cortical scintigraphy imaging was performed before and after the operation. Results There were no differences between the two groups in terms of success rate (mPNL(63.5%) vs. sPNL(71.2%), p=0.403), serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, split renal functions pre- and postoperatively (p≥0.05). There was no relationship between the type of operation and new scar formation (p=0.780). The rates of serious complication (grades 3 and 4 according to modified Clavien-Dindo Classification) were higher in sPNL (p=0.034). Stone burden, duration of operation, hemoglobin drop, multiple access, blood transfusion, and angioembolization were higher in patients with scarred kidneys (p<0.001, p=0.008, p=0.004, p<0.001, p=0.003, p=0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only multiple access was found statistically significant for predicting new scar formation (p<0.001, OR:24.28). Conclusions Miniaturized and standard PNL are reliable and successful operations for treating large kidney stones. No significant difference was found between the operation types regarding a decrease in renal function (AU)

Resultados iniciales del tratamiento endourológico de la litiasis renoureteral mediante ureteroscopia flexible y cirugía percutánea en régimen de cirugía mayor ambulatoria en un centro de tercer nivel / Initial results of endourological treatment of renoureteral lithiasis by means of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous surgery in an outpatient procedure in a tertiary care center

Objetivo La litiasis urinaria es una enfermedad prevalente y con elevado impacto socioeconómico, donde la cirugía endourológica ha demostrado excelentes resultados con mínimas complicaciones. Por su parte, la cirugía ambulatoria es un modelo asistencial eficiente, seguro y de calidad. Presentamos nuestra experiencia en el tratamiento endourológico ambulatorio de la litiasis renoureteral y una revisión de las principales series. Material y métodos Análisis prospectivo de 85 procedimientos flexibles o percutáneos para el tratamiento de la litiasis, llevados a cabo en nuestro centro entre enero de 2021 y abril de 2022. Se estableció como objetivo principal analizar la tasa de ingreso no planificado y como objetivos secundarios el éxito e incidencia de complicaciones. Los pacientes fueron seleccionados siguiendo los criterios del proceso asistencial. Resultados La edad media fue de 56±14 años. El urocultivo fue positivo en 13,9% de los pacientes, siendo portadores de doble J prequirúrgico 38%. Mediana de superficie litiásica de 55 mm2, con 961±323 Unidades Hounsfield. Se realizaron 73 procedimientos flexibles y 12 percutáneos. Ocho pacientes requirieron ingreso no planificado inmediato y otros dos durante el primer mes. Al tercer mes, 94% se encontraban libre de litiasis. No se detectaron complicaciones intraoperatorias, aunque 16,5% de los pacientes presentaron algún tipo de complicación postoperatoria. Conclusión En nuestra experiencia, con una estricta selección de los pacientes y siguiendo un proceso asistencial con participación multidisciplinar, los procedimientos endourológicos son factibles y seguros en el ámbito ambulatorio. La monitorización periódica de los resultados es fundamental en aras de una mejora constante del proceso (AU)

Objective Urinary lithiasis is a prevalent disease with a high socioeconomic impact, where endourological surgery has shown excellent results with minimal complications. For its part, outpatient surgery is an efficient, safe and quality care model. We present our experience in the outpatient endourological treatment of lithiasis and a review of the main series. Material and methods Prospective analysis of 85 flexible or percutaneous procedures for the treatment of lithiasis, carried out in our center between January 2021 and April 2022. The main objective was to analyze the rate of unplanned admission and the success and incidence of complications as secondary objectives. The patients were selected following the inclusion criteria of the care process. Results The mean age was 56±14 years. Urine culture was positive in 13.9% of the patients, 38% had a pre-surgical double-J catheter. Median stone surface was 55 mm2 (961±323 Hounsfield Units). 73 flexible and 12 percutaneous procedures were performed. 8 patients required immediate unplanned admission and another 2 during the first month. 94% were stone-free at the third month. No intraoperative complications were detected, although 16.5% of the patients presented some type of postoperative complication. Conclusion In our experience, with a strict selection of patients and following a care process with multidisciplinary participation, endourological procedures are feasible and safe in the outpatient setting. Periodic monitoring of the results is essential for the sake of a constant improvement of the process (AU)

Comparison of the effect of miniaturized and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function assessed with DMSA scintigraphy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to present a clinical study that compares standard and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) effects on kidney function with scintigraphic imaging in primary kidney stone patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred four patients were included in this prospective study between May 2014 and February 2017. Eligible patients were divided into two groups miniaturized PNL (mPNL) and standard PNL (sPNL) with matched-pair analysis (1:1 scenario). Technetium-99m Dimercaptosuccinic Acid cortical scintigraphy imaging was performed before and after the operation. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups in terms of success rate (mPNL (63.5%) vs. sPNL (71.2%), p=0.403), serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, split renal functions pre- and postoperatively (p≥0.05). There was no relationship between the type of operation and new scar formation (p=0.780). The rates of serious complication (grades 3 and 4 according to modified Clavien-Dindo Classification) were higher in sPNL (p=0.034). Stone burden, duration of operation, hemoglobin drop, multiple access, blood transfusion, and angioembolization were higher in patients with scarred kidneys (p<0.001, p=0.008, p=0.004, p<0.001, p=0.003, p=0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only multiple access was found statistically significant for predicting new scar formation (p<0.001, OR: 24.28). CONCLUSIONS: Miniaturized and standard PNL are reliable and successful operations for treating large kidney stones. No significant difference was found between the operation types regarding a decrease in renal function.

Complicaciones frecuentes en pacientes con nefrolitotomía percutánea / Common complications in patients with percutaneous nephrolithotomy

RESUMEN La nefrolitotomía percutánea es un procedimiento estandarizado para el tratamiento de la litiasis renal. El objetivo de esta comunicación fue describir las complicaciones que más incidieron en los pacientes que fueron atendidos en el Hospital Universitario Clínico-Quirúrgico «Arnaldo Milián Castro¼, en el servicio de Urología, de enero de 2015 a diciembre de 2019, a los cuales se les realizó nefrolitotomía percutánea, así como el tratamiento que recibieron y su evolución. Este estudio mostró bajo índice de complicaciones, lo que guarda relación con el poco tiempo utilizado para realizar esta técnica. Esto resultó beneficioso ya que contribuyó a la corta estadía hospitalaria y disminuyó el consumo de materiales e insumos médicos. También representa un gran logro para los médicos y sobre todo para el paciente, el cual puede recuperarse en un menor período de tiempo y vincularse rápidamente a su vida diaria.

ABSTRACT Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a standardized procedure for the treatment of kidney stones. The objective of this communication was to describe complications, treatment and evolution of patients who underwent a percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the Urology service at "Arnaldo Milián Castro" Clinical and Surgical University Hospital from January 2015 to December 2019. This study showed a low rate of complications, which is related to the short time used to perform this technique. This was beneficial since it contributed to the short hospital stay and decreased the consumption of medical materials and supplies. It also represents a great achievement for doctors and above all for the patients, who can recover in a shorter period of time and be quickly returned to their daily life.

Factores de riesgo independientes asociados al sangrado en la nefrolitotomía percutánea: estudio retrospectivo / Independent risk factors affecting hemorrhage in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Retrospective study

Introducción: El mayor motivo de preocupación durante el perioperatorio y postoperatorio de la nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLP) es el sangrado. Se determinaron las condiciones relacionadas con la enfermedad (tamaño del cálculo, UH del cálculo, número de trayectos y diámetro) que afectan el desarrollo de esta condición, con el objetivo de conocer los factores de riesgo independientes que pueden afectar el volumen del sangrado en la NLP.Material y método: Se incluyeron en el estudio un total de 308 pacientes adultos (211 hombres y 97 mujeres) sometidos al procedimiento de NLP. La anatomía renal y el tamaño de los cálculos se evaluaron mediante tomografía computarizada de corte fino sin contraste. Esta prueba de imagen se utilizó para evaluar los valores de unidades Hounsfield (UH) de los cálculos renales, la presencia de placas de ateroma y la obesidad. Se registró la diferencia entre el valor preoperatorio de hemoglobina (Hgb) y el valor de Hgb del primer día del postoperatorio. Se evaluó esta variación en función del sexo, la edad, la enfermedad vascular aterosclerótica, el pH y la densidad de la orina, el recuento de leucocitos, de linfocitos, de neutrófilos (NEU) y de plaquetas, el volumen plaquetario medio (VPM), el índice neutrófilo-linfocito (INL), el índice plaqueta-linfocito, el volumen de los cálculos, las UH y la obesidad.Resultados: La variación media de Hgb se identificó como 2,1 (desviación estándar: 1,6). Hubo correlaciones positivas, significativas y débiles entre la variación de Hgb con los valores de NEU (p=0,019), VPM (p=0,000), INL (p=0,005), volumen del cálculo (p=0,041) y UH (p=0,024). Hubo una correlación negativa significativa y débil entre la variación de la Hgb y el recuento PLT (p=0,022). No se identificaron efectos a niveles significativos del sexo (p=0,078), la presencia de placas de ateroma (p=0,949), la obesidad (p=0,869), la edad (AU)

Introduction: The perioperative and postoperative concern in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is bleeding. Disease-related conditions (such as stone size, stone HU, tract number, and diameter) affecting this situation were determined. To determine independent risk factors that may affect the amount of hemorrhage in PNL.Material and method: A total of 308 adult patients (211 men, 97 women) undergoing the PNL procedure were included in the study. Renal anatomy and stone size were evaluated using non-contrast thin-section computed tomography (NCCT). NCCT was used to assess Hounsfield unit (HU) values of kidney stones, presence of atheroma plaque and obesity. The difference between preoperative hemoglobin (Hgb) values and postoperative 1st day Hgb values was recorded. This variation was evaluated for the effect of gender, age, atherosclerotic vein disease, urine pH and density, leukocyte count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil count (NEU), platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), stone volume, HU, and obesity.ResultsThe mean Hgb variation was identified as 2.1 (standard deviation: 1.6). There were positive, significant, and weak correlations between the Hgb variation with NEU (P=.019), MPV (P=.000), NLR (P=.005), stone volume (P=.041) and HU (P=.024) values. There was a negative significant and weak correlation between Hgb variation and PLT (P=.022). No effects at significant levels were identified for gender (P=.078), presence of atheroma plaque (P=.949), obesity (P=.869), age (P=.686), urine pH (P=.746), urine density (P=.421), and PLR (P=.855) on Hgb variations.Conclusion: In addition to HU and stone volume, NEU count, MPV, NLR and PLT count may be used as independent risk factors to predict blood loss during PNL (AU)

Posición óptima para la nefrolitotomía percutánea en el riñón en herradura: ¿prono tradicional o supino? / Optimal patient position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys: Traditional prone or supine?

Objetivo: Aunque se ha afirmado que la nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLPC) en posición supina se asocia a tiempos quirúrgicos relativamente más cortos y a tasas de éxito y complicaciones comparables, no hay consenso en la literatura actual sobre la seguridad y la eficacia de la NLPC en posición supina en pacientes con riñón en herradura. Nuestro objetivo es comparar la NLPC en posición supina y en posición prona, en términos de seguridad y eficacia en pacientes con riñón en herradura.Métodos: Se revisaron retrospectivamente los datos de los pacientes con riñón en herradura sometidos a una NLPC por cálculos renales de más de 2cm entre enero de 2010 y mayo de 2021. Los pacientes del estudio se clasificaron como Grupo1 (NLPC en supino [SNLPC]) y Grupo2 (NLPC en prono [PNLPC]). Se compararon los datos demográficos, clínicos y quirúrgicos de los dos grupos.Resultados: Se incluyeron 65 pacientes, de los cuales 31 (47,7%) pertenecían al Grupo1 y 34 (52,3%) al Grupo2. Los datos demográficos, las características de los cálculos, los parámetros perioperatorios y las tasas de complicaciones fueron estadísticamente similares entre los dos grupos (p>0,05). No hubo diferencias estadísticas en cuanto a las tasas de tratamiento adicional y las tasas de ausencia de cálculos en los controles postoperatorios del segundo día y del tercer mes (p>0,05). El tiempo quirúrgico medio fue significativamente mayor en el Grupo2 (113±17,1minutos) que en el Grupo1 (90,6±11,3minutos) (p=0,000).Conclusión: Aunque tradicionalmente se realiza en posición prona, el abordaje en posición supina es similar en términos de seguridad y de eficacia. Además, la posición supina se asocia con tiempos quirúrgicos significativamente más cortos (AU)

Objective: Although it was stated that supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was associated with relatively shorter surgical times and comparable success and complication rates, there is no consensus in the current literature concerning the safety and efficacy of supine PCNL in patients with horseshoe kidneys. We aimed to compare supine and prone PCNL regarding safety and efficacy in patients with horseshoe kidneys.Methods: Data of the patients with horseshoe kidneys who underwent PCNL for renal stones larger than 2cm between January 2010 and May 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The study patients were categorized as Group1 (i.e., supine PCNL-SPCNL) and Group2 (i.e., prone PCNL-PPCNL). Both groups were compared regarding demographic, clinical, and surgical data.Results: Sixty-five patients were included. Among these patients, 31 (47.7%) were in Group1, while 34 (52.3%) were in Group2. Both groups were statistically similar in terms of demographic data, stone characteristics, perioperative parameters, and complication rates (P>.05). There was no statistical difference in terms of additional treatment rates, stone-free rates in the postoperative second-day and third-month evaluations (P>.05). Mean surgical time was significantly longer in Group2 (113±17.1minutes) than in Group1 (90.6±11.3minutes) (P=.000).Conclusion: Although it is traditionally performed in the prone position, the supine approach is as safe and effective as the prone approach. In addition, the supine approach is associated with significantly shorter surgical times (AU)