ABSTRACT
Background: Neoaortic root dilatation (NeoARD) and neoaortic regurgitation (NeoAR) are common sequelae following the arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries. Objectives: The authors aimed to estimate the cumulative incidence of NeoAR, assess whether larger neoaortic root dimensions were associated with NeoAR, and evaluate factors associated with the development of NeoAR during long-term follow-up. Methods: Electronic databases were systematically searched for articles that assessed NeoAR and NeoARD after ASO, published before November 2022. The primary outcome was NeoAR, classified based on severity categories (trace, mild, moderate, and severe). Cumulative incidence was estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves, neoaortic root dimensions using Z-scores, and risk factors were evaluated using random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Thirty publications, comprising a total of 6,169 patients, were included in this review. Pooled estimated cumulative incidence of ≥mild NeoAR and ≥moderate NeoAR at 30-year follow-up were 67.5% and 21.4%, respectively. At last follow-up, neoaortic Z-scores were larger at the annulus (mean difference [MD]: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.52-1.82, P < 0.001; MD: 1.38, 95% CI: 0.46-2.30, P = 0.003) and root (MD: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.16-2.49, P < 0.001; MD: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.07-2.60, P < 0.001) in patients with ≥mild and ≥moderate NeoAR, respectively, compared to those without NeoAR. Risk factors for the development of any NeoAR included prior pulmonary artery banding, presence of a ventricular septal defect, aorto-pulmonary mismatch, a bicuspid pulmonary valve, and NeoAR at discharge. Conclusions: The risks of NeoARD and NeoAR increase over time following ASO surgery. Identified risk factors for NeoAR may alert the clinician that closer follow-up is needed. (Risk factors for neoaortic valve regurgitation after arterial switch operation: a meta-analysis; CRD42022373214).
ABSTRACT
Introducción y objetivos Hay pocos datos sobre la evolución en adultos de la dilatación de la raíz neoaórtica (RAO) y la insuficiencia valvular neoaórtica (IA) tras la cirugía de switch arterial (SA) en la transposición de grandes arterias. Métodos Análisis retrospectivo de 152 pacientes con transposición de grandes arterias, mayores de 15 años, intervenidos mediante SA y seguidos durante 4,9±3,3 años en 2 centros de referencia. Se analizaron los cambios de diámetro de la RAO ajustados a superficie corporal y la progresión a grado moderado/grave de la IA con ecocardiografías seriadas. Se realizó un modelo de regresión de Cox para identificar factores predictores de progresión de la IA. Resultados Inicialmente, 4 pacientes (2,6%) presentaban IA grave (3 habían precisado cirugía valvular) y 9 (5,9%) moderada. La RAO basal media era 20,05±2,4mm/m2, y al final del seguimiento, 20,73±2,8mm/m2 (p<0,001), con un crecimiento medio de 0,14 (IC95%, 0,07-0,2) mm/m2/año. La IA progresó en 20 (13,5%) y 6 (4%) fueron intervenidos. La progresión de IA se asoció con válvula bicúspide, IA inicial, dilatación de la RAO inicial y crecimiento de la RAO. La válvula bicúspide (HR=3,3; IC95%, 1,1-15,2; p=0,037), la IA inicial (HR=5,9; IC95%, 1,6-59,2; p=0,006) y el crecimiento de la RAO (HR=4,1; IC95%, 2-13,5; p=0,023) resultaron predictores independientes. Conclusiones La dilatación de la RAO y la IA progresan en el adulto joven intervenido mediante SA. La válvula bicúspide, la IA basal y el crecimiento de la RAO son predictores de progresión de IA. (AU)
Introduction and objectives There are limited data on the long-term development of neoaortic root dilatation (NRD) and neoaortic valve regurgitation (AR) after arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries during adult life. Methods We performed a retrospective longitudinal analysis of 152 patients older than 15 years who underwent ASO for transposition of the great arteries and who were followed-up for 4.9±3.3 years in 2 referral centers. Sequential changes in body surface-adjusted aortic root dimensions and progression to moderate/severe AR were determined in patients with 2 or more echocardiographic examinations. Risk factors for dilatation were tested by Cox regression to identify predictors of AR progression. Results At baseline, moderate AR was present in 9 patients (5.9%) and severe AR in 4 (2.6%), of whom 3 had required aortic valve surgery. Initially, the median neoaortic root dimension was 20.05±2.4mm/m2, which increased significantly to 20.73±2.8mm/m2 (P <.001) at the end of follow-up. The mean change over time was 0.14mm/m2/y (95%CI, 0.07-0.2). Progressive AR was observed in 20 patients (13.5%) and 6 patients (4%) required aortic valve surgery. Progressive AR was associated with bicuspid valve, AR at baseline, NRD at baseline, and neoaortic root enlargement. Independent predictors were bicuspid valve (HR, 3.3; 95%CI, 1.1-15.2; P=.037), AR at baseline (HR, 5.9; 95%CI, 1.6-59.2; P=.006) and increase in NRD (HR, 4.1 95%CI, 2-13.5; P=.023). Conclusions In adult life, NRD and AR progress over time after ASO. Predictors of progressive AR are bicuspid valve, AR at baseline, and increase in NRD. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/epidemiology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Transposition of Great Vessels/surgery , Procrastination , Follow-Up Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There are limited data on the long-term development of neoaortic root dilatation (NRD) and neoaortic valve regurgitation (AR) after arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries during adult life. METHODS: We performed a retrospective longitudinal analysis of 152 patients older than 15 years who underwent ASO for transposition of the great arteries and who were followed-up for 4.9±3.3 years in 2 referral centers. Sequential changes in body surface-adjusted aortic root dimensions and progression to moderate/severe AR were determined in patients with 2 or more echocardiographic examinations. Risk factors for dilatation were tested by Cox regression to identify predictors of AR progression. RESULTS: At baseline, moderate AR was present in 9 patients (5.9%) and severe AR in 4 (2.6%), of whom 3 had required aortic valve surgery. Initially, the median neoaortic root dimension was 20.05±2.4mm/m2, which increased significantly to 20.73±2.8mm/m2 (P <.001) at the end of follow-up. The mean change over time was 0.14mm/m2/y (95%CI, 0.07-0.2). Progressive AR was observed in 20 patients (13.5%) and 6 patients (4%) required aortic valve surgery. Progressive AR was associated with bicuspid valve, AR at baseline, NRD at baseline, and neoaortic root enlargement. Independent predictors were bicuspid valve (HR, 3.3; 95%CI, 1.1-15.2; P=.037), AR at baseline (HR, 5.9; 95%CI, 1.6-59.2; P=.006) and increase in NRD (HR, 4.1 95%CI, 2-13.5; P=.023). CONCLUSIONS: In adult life, NRD and AR progress over time after ASO. Predictors of progressive AR are bicuspid valve, AR at baseline, and increase in NRD.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency , Arterial Switch Operation , Transposition of Great Vessels , Adult , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/epidemiology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Dilatation , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Transposition of Great Vessels/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate incidence and results of surgical intervention for neoaortic root pathology following arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries (TGA). METHODS: Between April 1996 and August 2013, 12 patients underwent reoperation for neoaortic root dilatation (ARD) and/or neoaortic valve regurgitation (AR). Maximal aortic sinus and annulus diameter Z-scores were recorded. Original diagnoses were TGA/IVS (6), TGA/ventricular septal defect (VSD) (4) and Taussig-Bing anomaly (2) with ASO at a median age of 0.1 (range: 0-10.6) years. Age at ASO, VSD and complex TGA were reviewed as possible risk factors for reoperation. RESULTS: Twelve patients with tricuspid neoaortic valves underwent 15 root operations; indications were root dilatation (4) and root dilatation with AR (8). Median age was 18.0 (3.0-29.0) years at first reoperation. Median aortic root Z-score at reoperation was 6.33 (range: 3.84-12.15). Procedures were: Bentall procedure (6), aortic valve replacement (2), neoaortic valve plasty (1), supracoronary tube (1) and switch-back operation (2). Mean follow-up was 7.0 ± 5.7 years and complete. No mortality occurred. One patient had two reoperations for late endocarditis. Technical difficulties were encountered related to specific anatomy post-ASO concerning coronary anatomy, poor exposure and thin-walled aorta at the site of pulmonary artery bifurcation after Lecompte manoeuvre. Valve sparing surgery seemed not feasible due to specific anatomy of the neoaortic root and valve. No risk factors for reoperation could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: After ASO, surgery for neoaortic root pathology may become necessary when follow-up is long enough and regardless of primary diagnosis or other risk factors. Redo neoaortic surgery can be performed with low risk taking into account the specific technical difficulties.
