Mammographically and sonographically occult male DCIS seen only on breast MRI.

Male breast cancer is a rare entity consisting of less than 1% of all breast cancer diagnoses, in which pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without an invasive component accounts for approximately 10% of these diagnoses. Early diagnosis and appropriate management are essential to ensure favorable outcomes. We present a rare case of mammographically and sonographically occult pure DCIS in a male patient presenting with unilateral bloody nipple discharge, highlighting imaging features and the potential utility of breast MRI that aided diagnosis and management.

Expression and clinical significance of CA125, CA153 and CEA in nipple discharge of breast cancer patients.

Background: It is an important clinical means to identify benign and malignant breast diseases caused by nipple discharge through the detection and analysis of components in nipple discharge. This study was aimed to test the expression and clinical significance of carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in nipple discharge of breast cancer patients. Methods: From January 2017 to December 2018, 86 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast with nipple discharge (breast cancer group) and 50 patients with ordinary breast duct hyperplasia with nipple discharge (benign control group) were selected, and the levels of CA125, CA153 and CEA in nipple discharge and serum were detected by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.

Surgical outcomes of total duct excision in the diagnosis and management of nipple discharge.

INTRODUCTION: Total duct excision (TDE) is performed for the diagnosis and management of nipple discharge. The Association of Breast Surgery's recent guidelines recommend considering diagnostic surgery for single-duct, blood-stained or clear nipple discharge, and for symptomatic management. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the diagnostic and surgical outcomes of all cases of TDE between January 2013 and November 2019. RESULTS: In total, 259 TDEs were carried out: 219 for nipple discharge, 29 for recurrent mastitis, 3 for screening abnormalities and 8 for breast lumps. Of the nipple discharge group, 121 had blood-stained discharge. Mean patient age was 52 years (range 19-81). Median follow-up time was 45 months (interquartile range 24-63). The following cases were identified on histopathology: 236 benign breast changes, 10 atypical ductal hyperplasia, 4 lobular carcinoma in situ, 2 low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 3 intermediate-grade DCIS, 2 high-grade DCIS and 2 invasive ductal carcinomas. In total, 3.5% of patients who underwent TDE had a diagnosis of DCIS or invasive carcinoma. Blood-stained discharge was associated with a significant increase in risk of DCIS or carcinoma compared with other nipple discharge colours (p = 0.043). The most common complications of TDE were infection, poor wound healing and haematoma. Nipple discharge recurred in 14.2% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: TDE can be considered for the diagnostics and management of nipple discharge. Blood-stained nipple discharge increases the risk of DCIS or malignancy, but the majority of the time TDE reveals benign breast pathology.

The Diagnostic Value of microRNA Expression Analysis in Detecting Intraductal Papillomas in Patients with Pathological Nipple Discharge.

Patients with pathological nipple discharge (PND) often undergo local surgical procedures because standard radiologic imaging fails to identify the underlying cause. MicroRNA (MiRNA) expression analysis of nipple fluid holds potential for distinguishing between breast diseases. This study aimed to compare miRNA expression levels between nipple fluids from patients with PND to identify possible relevant miRNAs that could differentiate between intraductal papillomas and no abnormalities in the breast tissue. Nipple fluid samples from patients with PND without radiological and pathological suspicion for malignancy who underwent a ductoscopy procedure were analyzed. We used univariate and multivariate regression analyses to identify nipple fluid miRNAs differing between pathologically confirmed papillomas and breast tissue without abnormalities. A total of 27 nipple fluid samples from patients with PND were included for miRNA expression analysis. Out of the 22 miRNAs examined, only miR-145-5p was significantly differentially expressed (upregulated) in nipple fluid from patients with an intraductal papilloma compared to patients showing no breast abnormalities (OR 4.76, p = 0.046), with a diagnostic accuracy of 92%. miR-145-5p expression in nipple fluid differs for intraductal papillomas and breast tissue without abnormalities and, therefore, has potential as a diagnostic marker to signal presence of papillomas in PND patients. However, further refinement and validation in clinical trials are necessary to establish its clinical applicability.

Clinical Significance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Galactography in Pre-operative Diagnosis of Patients With Pathologic Nipple Discharge.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the work described here was to investigate the feasibility and diagnostic value of using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) galactography with SonoVue in patients with pathologic nipple discharge (PND). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients who underwent breast surgery for PND from May 2019 to August 2021 were included. Routine ultrasound, ductoscopy and CEUS galactography were performed successively. Lesions were diagnosed and localized. The sensitivity, specificity and pre-operative localization value of each examination method were evaluated on post-operative pathology. RESULTS: CEUS galactography was successfully conducted in all 28 patients and revealed negative ductal ectasia, filling stop and filling defect. Ductoscopy revealed positive nodules in 21 cases and negative nodules in 7 cases. A total of 18 nodules were found by routine ultrasound, and the relationship between all nodules and the discharge duct was confirmed after CEUS galactography. Compared with the other two methods, CEUS galactography had higher sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (100%, 81.82% and 100%, respectively), while it has the same specificity as routine ultrasound (both 60%). The pre-operative location of the nipple duct was consistent with the intra-operative findings in 28 patients after CEUS galactography. CONCLUSION: The ultrasound contrast agent SonoVue can be used for CEUS galactography in patients with PND. CEUS galactography can improve the detection of ductal nodules and locate the nipple discharge duct pre-operatively. As the technique does not emit radiation and SonoVue is easily metabolized and safe, CEUS galactography is better than conventional imaging for PND patients.

Breast ductography: to do or not to do? A pictorial essay.

Nipple discharge is a frequent breast disease clinical presentation. Although most cases of nipple discharge are physiologic, pathologic nipple discharge is not uncommon. Eight to 15% of pathological nipple discharge is associated with malignancy, requiring investigation. Some specialists believe that ductography is a challenging procedure that is better to be substituted by other methods, such as MRI. However, an experienced physician can perform ductography quickly and easily and still play an essential role in some clinical scenarios. Conventional imaging, such as mammography and sonography, commonly fails to detect the underlying causes of pathological nipple discharge. MRI has limitations of low specificity, cost, lengthy exam duration, accessibility, and patient factors such as claustrophobia. In addition, we can make a specific diagnosis and appropriate treatment by coupling ductography with other methods, such as ultrasound-guided or stereotactic biopsy. This study aims to present the ductography technique, possible findings, and the clinical settings where ductography is useful.Critical relevance statement Although ductography is currently less used in breast imaging, it still plays an essential role in some clinical scenarios. These clinical scenarios include pathological nipple discharge with negative conventional imaging, contraindicated MRI, unavailable MRI, unremarkable MRI results, and multiple MRI findings.Key points• Conventional imaging commonly fails to detect the underlying causes of pathological nipple discharge.• MRI in the setting of nipple discharge has some limitations.• Ductography still plays an essential role in some clinical scenarios.• Coupling ductography with other methods helps make a specific diagnosis.

The Use of MRI to Detect Malignancy in a Patient Presenting With Unilateral Bloody Nipple Discharge.

Nipple discharge presents as either physiological, which is green, white, or yellow, or is considered pathological, which is typically unilateral, spontaneous, and bloody. Bloody nipple discharge (BND) can be due to underlying malignancy or premalignant lesions. Mammogram (MMG), ultrasound (US), MRI, and ductography are all used to evaluate BND, but different modalities offer greater value in the diagnostic process. Here, we present a case that demonstrates the ability of MRI to detect abnormalities not seen on MMG and US in the setting of BND due to underlying malignancy. The use of MRI earlier in the diagnostic process allows for the use of breast-conserving measures and decreases the possibility of metastasis. This would result in less of a need for more aggressive treatments.

A Second Ductoscopy Procedure in Patients with Recurrent and Persistent Pathological Nipple Discharge.

Background: Most patients suffering from pathological nipple discharge (PND) undergo local surgical procedures because standard radiological imaging often fails to reveal the cause. Ductoscopy is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique that enables direct intraductal visualization and can avoid unnecessary diagnostic surgical procedures. Hence, patients with recurrent or persistent PND after an unsuccessful ductoscopy procedure still undergo unnecessary surgery. This study describes the experience of a second ductoscopy procedure in patients with recurrent or persistent PND without suspicious radiological findings. Methods: Patients with recurrent or persistent PND who underwent two ductoscopy procedures between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The second ductoscopy was performed when the first ductoscopic attempt was unsuccessful due to technical problems. The primary outcome was the number of preventable surgical procedures. Results: A total of 17 patients underwent two ductoscopy procedures. The first ductoscopy showed a polypoid lesion in 10 patients (58.8%), no abnormalities in 3 patients (17.6%), and in 4 patients (23.5%), it was not possible to visualize the ductal tree. Post-procedure, all patients suffered from PND. After two ductoscopic attempts, PND stopped in 10 patients (58.8%), and 7 patients (41.2%) still suffered from PND and were operated on. Pathology of the resection specimens showed no abnormalities in 1 patient, a papilloma in 5 patients, and ductal carcinoma in situ in 1 patient. Conclusion: A second ductoscopy procedure can be considered in the diagnostic work-up of patients suffering from persistent or recurrent PND after an unsuccessful first ductoscopic attempt to avoid unnecessary surgery in about 59% of the cases.

Male breast cancer: Report of two cases with bloody nipple discharge.

We report 2 rare cases of male breast cancer with bloody nipple discharge. Patient 1, a 32-year-old male, presented with a bloody nipple discharge from the left breast. Diagnostic workup revealed papillary ductal carcinoma in situ. Patient 1 underwent bilateral mastectomy with left axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy and has been doing well ever since. Patient 2, a 70-year-old male with concomitant metastatic prostate cancer, presented with a palpable right breast mass and with initially serous, then bloody nipple discharge. Diagnostic workup revealed invasive ductal carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ of the right breast. Patient 2 received aromatase inhibitor therapy prior to right total mastectomy with SLN biopsy followed by adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Patient 2 recovered without complication for 2 years until metastatic disease recurrence was detected. This case report's purpose is to increase awareness and enhance understanding of the presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of rare malignant pathologies.

Breast cancer nipple discharge exosomal microRNAs are stable under degradative conditions.

We have previously shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) in nipple discharge are potential diagnostic biomarkers. In particular, exosomes are present in nipple discharge. Herein, we sought to elucidate the protective role of exosomes on miRNAs in nipple discharge and investigate the stability of miRNAs encapsulated in exosomes under degradative conditions. A novel TTMAAlPc-RNA complex method was used to measure the RNase concentration in colostrum and nipple discharge. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to test the stability of exogenous synthetic miRNAs (cel-lin-4-5p and cel-miR-2-3p) and endogenous miRNAs (hsa-miR-4732-5p, hsa-miR-3646, hsa-miR-4484, and kshv-miR-K12-5-5p). RNase was present and functional in colostrum and nipple discharge. Endogenous miRNAs were more stably expressed compared to exogenous miRNAs at room temperature and 4°C. Triton X-100 (1%, 30 min) destroyed the exosomal membrane, causing RNA degradation in colostrum but not in nipple discharge. Therefore, we confirmed that exosomes in colostrum and nipple discharge could protect miRNAs from degradation by RNase. Exosomes in nipple discharge may be more resistant to Triton X-100 lysis compared to those in the colostrum. Exosomal miRNAs in nipple discharge in breast cancer are stable under degradative conditions. Differential Triton X-100 sensitivity of exosomes of nipple discharge and colostrum warrants further investigation.

Syringomatous adenoma of the nipple: A case series and systematic review.

Key Clinical Message: SAN should be considered in the setting of nipple discharge or morphology changes with typical histological findings. There are limited published cases of SAN, and workup of this pathology is still not clear to date. Abstract: Syringomatous adenoma of the nipple (SAN) is known to be a rare benign breast neoplasm. With a few cases documented in the literature, preoperatively diagnosing this tumor is a challenge, which often leads to invasive procedure such as mass excision with nipple removal. This study was aimed at presenting a case report of SAN and to conduct a review of published cases. Literature search was conducted through PubMed databases. Articles published from year 1983 to March of 2022 were included. Only histologically confirmed cases of SAN were included. The review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-eight cases, including the newly reported case, were included in the review after going through inclusion criteria. The mean age at diagnosis was 44 ± 16 years. 7% were male. The most common presentation was palpable mass. Preoperative biopsy was done for 9 cases, out of which 7 did not indicate typical histopathological characteristic of SAN. Most common treatment was wide local excision with nipple removal. Immunohistochemical staining of the resected tumor was performed in 16 cases postoperatively. 32.1% (9/28) utilized p63 in constellation with histologic findings. Five cases that utilized staining also used Estrogen Receptor (ER) marker, while three used progesterone receptor (PR) marker. SAN should be considered in the setting of nipple discharge or morphology changes with typical histological findings. There are limited published cases of SAN, and workup of this pathology is still not clear to date. The case presented here and our comprehensive literature review suggest that pathohistological findings of SAN can be heterogeneous. Clinicians would also benefit from recognizing these variances. Further research and reported cases are needed to confidently diagnose SAN, which may open doors for less aggressive surgical treatment or surveillance option for asymptomatic patients.

Mammographic and Sonographic Findings of Intraductal Papilloma of the Right Breast: A Case Report.

Intraductal papillomas are tumors that arise in the epithelial cells of the mammary duct. Common presenting symptoms for intraductal papilloma include serous or serosanguinous nipple discharge or a palpable mass. We present a case of a 48-year-old woman who presented with spontaneous right breast nipple discharge and a palpable mass. Diagnostic imaging for the patient included mammography and ultrasound with color doppler imaging that revealed a mass at eight o'clock in the right breast at a distance of 2 cm from the nipple and that corresponded to the area of palpable concern. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy of the mass confirmed a diagnosis of intraductal papilloma. Surgical excision may be required in many cases of an intraductal papilloma due to the variety of diagnoses that can be included on the differential, the increased risk for cellular atypia, and the treatment for spontaneous nipple discharge.

Deep learning for real-time detection of breast cancer presenting pathological nipple discharge by ductoscopy.

Objective: As a common breast cancer-related complaint, pathological nipple discharge (PND) detected by ductoscopy is often missed diagnosed. Deep learning techniques have enabled great advances in clinical imaging but are rarely applied in breast cancer with PND. This study aimed to design and validate an Intelligent Ductoscopy for Breast Cancer Diagnostic System (IDBCS) for breast cancer diagnosis by analyzing real-time imaging data acquired by ductoscopy. Materials and methods: The present multicenter, case-control trial was carried out in 6 hospitals in China. Images for consecutive patients, aged ≥18 years, with no previous ductoscopy, were obtained from the involved hospitals. All individuals with PND confirmed from breast lesions by ductoscopy were eligible. Images from Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital were randomly assigned (8:2) to the training (IDBCS development) and internal validation (performance evaluation of the IDBCS) datasets. Diagnostic performance was further assessed with internal and prospective validation datasets from Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital; further external validation was carried out with datasets from 5 primary care hospitals. Diagnostic accuracies, sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values for IDBCS and endoscopists (expert, competent, or trainee) in the detection of malignant lesions were obtained by the Clopper-Pearson method. Results: Totally 11305 ductoscopy images in 1072 patients were utilized for developing and testing the IDBCS. Area under the curves (AUCs) in breast cancer detection were 0·975 (95%CI 0·899-0·998) and 0·954 (95%CI 0·925-0·975) in the internal validation and prospective datasets, respectively, and ranged between 0·922 (95%CI 0·866-0·960) and 0·965 (95%CI 0·892-0·994) in the 5 external validation datasets. The IDBCS had superior diagnostic accuracy compared with expert (0.912 [95%CI 0.839-0.959] vs 0.726 [0.672-0.775]; p<0.001), competent (0.699 [95%CI 0.645-0.750], p<0.001), and trainee (0.703 [95%CI 0.648-0.753], p<0.001) endoscopists. Conclusions: IDBCS outperforms clinical oncologists, achieving high accuracy in diagnosing breast cancer with PND. The novel system could help endoscopists improve their diagnostic efficacy in breast cancer diagnosis.

Clinicopathological and Imaging Features of Breast Papillary Lesions and Their Association with Pathologic Nipple Discharge.

No studies have evaluated whether any clinicopathological or imaging characteristics of breast papillary lesions are associated with pathological nipple discharge (PND). We analyzed 301 surgically confirmed papillary breast lesions diagnosed between January 2012 and June 2022. We evaluated clinical (age of patient, size of lesion, pathologic nipple discharge, palpability, personal/family history of breast cancer or papillary lesion, location, multiplicity, and bilaterality) and imaging characteristics (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), sonographic, and mammographic findings) and compared malignant versus non-malignant lesions and papillary lesions with versus without PND. The malignant group was significantly older than the non-malignant group (p < 0.001). Those in the malignant group were more palpable and larger (p < 0.001). Family history of cancer and peripheral location in the malignant group were more frequent than in the non-malignant group (p = 0.022 and p < 0.001). The malignant group showed higher BI-RADS, irregular shape, complex cystic and solid echo pattern, posterior enhancement on ultrasound (US), fatty breasts, visibility, and mass type on mammography (p < 0.001, 0.003, 0.009, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, and 0.01, respectively). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, peripheral location, palpability, and age of ≥50 years were factors significantly associated with malignancy (OR: 4.125, 3.556, and 3.390, respectively; p = 0.004, 0.034, and 0.011, respectively). Central location, intraductal nature, hyper/isoechoic pattern, and ductal change were more frequent in the PND group (p = 0.003, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Ductal change was significantly associated with PND on multivariate analysis (OR, 5.083; p = 0.029). Our findings will help clinicians examine patients with PND and breast papillary lesions more effectively.

Nipple Discharge Imaging Evaluation with Mammography, Ultrasound, Galactography, and MRI.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic yield of various imaging tests used to evaluate nipple discharge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single institution, IRB-approved, retrospective study was performed of 320 consecutive patients presenting with nipple discharge. Imaging and pathology were reviewed to determine the yield for malignancy, atypical high-risk lesions (HRLs), and intraductal papillomas (IDPs). RESULTS: Of the 320 patients, pathology or follow up confirmed 40 breast malignancies (40/320, 12.5%),14 atypical HRLs (14/320, 4.4%), 71 IDPs (71/320, 22.2%), 48 other benign pathologies (48/320,15.0%), and 147 unknown but benign cases (147/320, 45.9%). Physiologic discharge characteristics were observed in a minority of malignant cases: nonspontaneous (4/40, 10.0%); neither bloody nor clear (4/40, 10.0%); bilateral (3/40, 7.5%). Malignancy was associated with older age (p < 0.001) and bloody discharge (odds ratio 6.5, p < 0.0001). The combination of digital mammography and ultrasound had a 93% sensitivity and a 98% NPV, while contrast enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) had a 100% sensitivity and a 100% NPV for malignancy. Only three galactography examinations were performed among the malignant cohort, with minimal contribution (1 of 3) to the diagnostic evaluation. In this case, galactography findings helped determine imaging-pathology discordance, prompting a recommendation for surgical excision and subsequently a malignant diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The combination of mammography and ultrasonography detected 93% of breast malignancies associated with nipple discharge and had a 98% NPV for malignancy. The value of CE-MRI is its ability to detect the remaining malignancies, not detected on mammography or ultrasound, and its ability to obviate the need for surgical duct excision.

The Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Galactography in Patients With Pathologic Nipple Discharge.

Twenty patients with pathologic nipple discharge underwent conventional galactography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) galactography. Images were reviewed for detection of suspicious lesions. Lesion localization information from CEUS galactography was recorded. We included 25 lesions from the 20 included patients. The pathological results revealed 13 intraductal papillomas. The detective rates of intraductal papilloma by conventional galactography and CEUS galactography were 92.31% and 100%, respectively. All the preoperative localizations of lesions from CEUS galactography were in accordance with the surgical detections. CEUS galactography is a highly effective tool for the detection of intraductal breast lesions, and it could provide accurate lesion localization information for an optimal surgical design.

What is the role of breast MRI in the management of women with pathologic nipple discharge and normal conventional imaging?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate the diagnostic performance of breast MRI in revealing mammographically and sonographically occult lesions requiring excision in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 57 women with pathologic nipple discharge who had normal or inconclusive mammography and ultrasonography results and underwent breast MRI were determined. Patients who had histopathological diagnosis or ≥ 1-year imaging follow-up were included. MRIs were classified as positive and negative according to final BI-RADS assessment categories. Diagnostic performance of MRI, including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value, was calculated for detecting both malignancy and lesions requiring surgery. RESULTS: Abnormal contrast enhancement on the pathologic nipple discharge side was detected in 29 MRIs (50.8%), categorized as BI-RADS 4. Abnormal findings were solid masses in 17 cases (58.6%) and non-mass enhancement in 12 cases (41.3%). Despite normal conventional imaging results, 4 malignant lesions and 16 lesions requiring surgery were detected with MRI. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI for detecting lesions requiring surgery were 100% and 68.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value were 55.1% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study confirmed that MRI is a reliable tool to detect lesions requiring surgery in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. MRI should be used in routine workup in patients with normal conventional imaging and imaging follow-up can be safely applied in patients with negative MRI.

Management of Nipple Discharge.

Nipple discharge is the third most common breast-related complaint but is rarely the presenting symptom of breast cancer. Distinguishing patients with physiologic versus pathologic nipple discharge, and treating the later according to the underlying pathologic condition is of utmost importance. Nipple discharge is categorized as lactational, physiologic, or pathologic. Physiologic nipple discharge (galactorrhea) is typically caused by hyperprolactinemia due to medications (ie, antipsychotics), pituitary tumors, and endocrine disorders. When a suspicious radiologic lesion is identified, pathologic assessment of the lesion is indicated. Patients with pathologic nipple discharge should be referred to a breast surgeon for definitive treatment and follow-up.

A comparative analysis of diagnostic values of high-frequency ultrasound and fiberoptic ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) and fiberoptic ductoscopy (FDS) for pathologic nipple discharge (PND). METHODS: HFUS and FDS were conducted in 210 patients with PND (248 lesions) treated at our hospital. The diagnostic accuracy of these two methods was compared using pathological diagnosis as the standard. RESULTS: Among 248 lesions, 16 and 15 of 16 malignant lesions were accurately diagnosed by HFUS and FDS, respectively. Of 232 benign lesions, 183 and 196 cases were accurately diagnosed by HFUS and FDS, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of HFUS in diagnosis of intraductal lesions were 84.36% (95% CI 79.26-88.39%), 60% (95% CI 23.07-92.89%), 96.03% (95% CI 96.55-99.83%), and 7.31% (95% CI 2.52-19.4%) respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of FDS in diagnosis of intraductal lesions were 86.83% (95% CI 82.00-90.52%), 100% (95% CI 56.55-100%), 100% (95% CI 98.21-100%), and 13.51% (95% CI 5.91-27.98%) respectively. Diagnostic accuracy rates of HFUS and FDS were 83.87% (208/248) and 85.08% (211/248), respectively, exhibiting no statistically differences (χ2 = 0.80, P > 0.05). The accuracy of HFUS combined with FDS was 93.14% (231/248), showing statistically differences (χ2 = 10.91, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both HFUS and FDS demonstrated high diagnostic values for PND. HFUS has the advantage of non-invasive for nipple discharge with duct ectasia, exhibited good qualitative and localization diagnostic values. It is the preferred evaluation method for patients with nipple discharge. When HFUS cannot identify the cause of PND, FDS can be considered.