The Assessment of Retinal Image Quality Using a Non-Mydriatic Fundus Camera in a Teleophthalmologic Platform.

This study assesses the quality of retinal images captured using a non-mydriatic fundus camera within a teleophthalmologic platform in Taiwan. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of non-mydriatic fundus cameras for remote retinal screening and identify factors impacting image quality. From June 2020 to August 2022, 629 patients from five rural infirmaries underwent ophthalmic examinations, with fundus images captured without pupil dilation. These images were reviewed by senior ophthalmologists and graded based on quality. The results indicated that approximately 70% of images were of satisfactory diagnostic quality. Risk factors for poor image quality included older age, the presence of cataracts, pseudophakia, and diabetes mellitus. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using non-mydriatic fundus cameras for teleophthalmology, highlighting the importance of identifying and addressing factors that affect image quality to enhance diagnostic accuracy in remote settings.

Diagnostic accuracy of non-mydriatic fundus camera for screening of diabetic retinopathy: A hospital based observational study in Pakistan.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of non-mydriatic fundus camera for the detection of diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted at Al Ibrahim Eye Hospital, Karachi, from January to May 2015, and comprised patients with type 2 diabetes who were screened for diabetic retinopathy. Single 45° fundus image focussed at macula was obtained and labelled using non-mydriatic fundus camera by a trained optometrist. Photos were labelled as positive (diabetic retinopathy present), negative (no diabetic retinopathy) or unreadable. The pupil was then dilated and fundi were examined by ophthalmologist with slit-lamp and fundus lens. Results of fundus examination were labelled as positive, negative or invisible/indecisive. Results of ophthalmologist were taken as the standard reference to evaluate sensitivity and speci?city for detecting diabetic retinopathy with non-mydriatic fundus camera. SPSS 20 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Total eyes screened numbered 2970 related to 1485 patients. Diabetic retinopathy was found in 646(21.8%) eyes, 485(20.9%) photographs were unreadable and 1839(57.3%) were normal. Ophthalmologist on slit lamp bio-microscopy labelled 736(25%) eyes as positive for diabetes retinopathy, 335(15%) as indecisive and 1899(60%) as normal. The sensitivity of non-mydriatic fundus camera was 400/556 (72%) while specificity was 1548/1794 (86.3%). Positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 400/646 (62%) and 1548/1704 (90%) respectively. The level of agreement was moderate (k=0.0551) for optometrist compared to ophthalmologist. False positive diagnosis by optometrist numbered 78/1839 (4.24%) and false negative was 123/646(19%). CONCLUSIONS: Non-mydriatic fundus camera was found to be a reliable screening tool for detecting and referral diabetic retinopathy cases to ophthalmologist for further evaluation and management.

Risk Factor Analysis of Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnosed with Non-mydriatic Fundus Camera: KNHANES V

PURPOSE: To clarify the relationship between various factors (sociodemographic factors, health behavioral risk factors and health status, and diabetic factors) related to diabetic retinopathy and to suggest improvements regarding the associated medical examination. METHODS: The subjects were 1,444 diabetic patients diagnosed in the 5th Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), aged 19 years or older, who underwent non-mydriatic fundus photography. The criteria for diagnosing diabetes were a fasting glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL and a previous diagnosis of diabetes or currently undergoing treatment. The diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy followed the modified Airlie House classification. Univariate and multivariate analyses of diabetic retinopathy were performed. RESULTS: Among the 1,444 patients who were diagnosed with diabetes, 277 had diabetic retinopathy; the prevalence rate was 19.18%. The higher the body mass index, the lower the risk of diabetic retinopathy by 0.924 times (p = 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.883–0.966). The longer the duration of diabetes, the greater the risk of diabetic retinopathy; the prevalence period group of more than 11 years had a 26.025-fold higher risk than the newly diagnosed group (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 10.840–62.482). The risk of diabetic retinopathy increased with the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level; the risk was 5.973-fold higher in the group with HbA1c above 11.0% (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 2.984–11.956) compared with the group with HbA1c < 6.0%. The risk of diabetic retinopathy was 2.050-fold greater with insulin injections (p = 0.003; 95% CI, 1.284–3.275). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of diabetic retinopathy was higher in patients with a longer duration of diabetes, a high HbA1c level, and in those using insulin. These findings highlight the need for early education and ophthalmologic examinations for at-risk patients.

Utility of 1% Tropicamide in Improving the Quality of Images for Tele-Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Dark Irides.

PURPOSE: To compare the quality of fundus photographs taken before and after instillation of one drop of tropicamide. METHODS: The 45º fundus photographs were taken with a non-mydriatic fundus camera in three conditions of the pupil; pre-mydriatic, 10 minutes after one drop of tropicamide, and fully dilated. Two photographs were taken in each condition; one centered on the macula and the other on the optic disc. Two vitreoretinal specialists graded the images. RESULTS: A total of 1768 fundus photographs of 149 diabetic patients with dark irides were included. There were more ungradable images (38.1% and 50.3%, graders 1 and 2, respectively) in the non-mydriatic state than partially- (4.6% and 11.5%) or fully-dilated (15.4% and 10.0%) conditions (p < 0.001, both graders). Partially and fully dilated states had similar rates of ungradable images (p = 0.56 and p = 0.54, graders 1 and 2, respectively). Test-retest reliability (repeatability) was 92.5% and 74.3% for the two graders, respectively. Inter-grader agreement was moderate (Kappa = 0.50). CONCLUSION: Non-mydriatic fundus photographs have a high rate of ungradable images in patients with dark irides. Instillation of only one drop of tropicamide improves the quality of fundus photographs, which is not furthered by adding more drops. This strategy can be used in tele-ophthalmology programs.

Five-year experience of tele-ophthalmology for diabetic retinopathy screening in a rural population. / Análisis de un programa de teleoftalmología para el cribado de retinopatía diabética en área rural tras cinco años.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy (DR) among rural inhabitants included in a tele-ophthalmology program. To analyse diagnostic accuracy among primary care physicians, concordance with ophthalmologists, and financial savings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational randomised study was conducted on 394 patients included in a tele-ophthalmology program (from January 2010 to January 2015). An analysis was performed on the clinical characteristics, DR findings in retinography images, and correspondence between the request for a second interpretation by an ophthalmologist, and previously established criteria for it: presence of moderate to severe DR, vision loss, poor image quality and/or intraocular pressure >22mmHg. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS program (Student t and χ(2) tests). RESULTS: DR prevalence was 12.1%. Patients with glycosylated haemoglobin values >7.68% or those treated with a combination of insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs showed a higher risk of DR (P<.05). 43.3% of patients correctly referred to ophthalmologists showed moderate to severe DR. Unnecessary referrals to specialists were improved from 91.7% in 2010 to 98.6% in 2014. It is estimated that the program has made a total saving of €152,550.45. CONCLUSIONS: Tele-ophthalmology programs are a useful tool in DR screening. Primary care physicians are able to distinguish patients who need specialist care, avoiding unnecessary referrals to ophthalmologists, and saving costs.

Clinical significance of non - mydriatic fundus photography in screening for preschool children ocular fundus disease / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

AIM:To observe the incidence of ocular fundus disease in preschool children examined by non-mydriatic fundus camera and evaluate its effectiveness compared with direct inspection shadow mirror. METHODS: Three thousand eight hundred and ninety-six preschool children from April 2012 to October 2013 were examined by Topcon TRC-NW300 color fluorescence fundus camera and direct inspection shadow mirror, and images were saved immediately. RESULTS: Detection rate of non - mydriatic fundus photography was higher than that of direct inspection shadow mirror. In 3 896 cases, 41 eyes were detected abnormal fundus accounting for 1. 05%. The retinal myelinated nerve fibers, morning glory syndrome, retinitis pigmentosa, congenital retinoschisis were common, accounted for 24. 39%, 21. 95%, 14. 63%, 12-20% respectively. The children eye diseases were often accompanied by abnormal vision (68. 30%), ametropia (63. 41%), strabismus (19. 51%). CONCLUSION:Non-mydriatic fundus photography is a mydriatic method without medicine, so it is easy for preschool children to accept. Image results could directly display the fundus lesions. It shows important significance in the screening for preschool children eye diseases.

A new method of cataract imaging evaluation / 眼科

Photography of slit-lamp biomicroscopy combined with retro-illumination photography is the gold standard in cataract evaluation. However the application is limited due to its complexity and low efficiency. We introduce digital non-mydriatic fundus photography as a new method for cataract screening in patients with visual impairment,which might play an important role in screening low vision and blindness caused by cataract. Two distinguished benefits are found in this method including compatibility for tele-diagnosis,and integration with screening of glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Cautions should be made on the photographs in which media opacity derived from other than cataract or low quality photos due to small pupils.