Clinical Features of Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction: Insights From the ASIAN-HF Registry.

Background: Heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction in the normal range (HFnEF) (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] of ≥55% for men and ≥60% for women) is understudied. Objectives: The authors aimed to characterize patients with HFnEF compared with those with preserved (≥50%) yet below the normal LVEF. Methods: In an Asian HF registry, clinical characteristics, echocardiographic features, and outcomes were compared across: 1) HFnEF; 2) heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF) (LVEF of ≥50%) and below normal LVEF; and 3) community-based controls without HF. Cluster analysis of echocardiographic parameters was performed and validated in an external cohort. Results: Among 1,765 patients with HFpEF (age 68 ± 12 years; 50% women), 1,313 (74.4%) had HFnEF. Compared with patients with HFpEF and below normal LVEF, patients with HFnEF had less coronary artery disease (33.7% vs 27.9%), greater LV wall thickness, and higher stroke volume, but similar 2-year age-adjusted all-cause mortality (HR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.6-1.2). Five echocardiographic clusters with similar 2-year mortality were identified: 1) normal LV (normal structure despite increased filling pressure; least comorbidities) in 25%; 2) restrictive (smallest stroke volume; predominantly elderly women) in 26%; 3) hypertrophic (most concentric hypertrophy; more men) in 25%; 4) high output (greatest stroke volume; predominantly obese younger men) in 10%; and 5) atrial dominant (most left atrial myopathy; mainly elderly women with multiple comorbidities) in 10%. Similar patterns were found in the validation cohort. Conclusions: The majority of patients with HFpEF had normal LVEF, which consists of patients with different patterns of cardiac features and clinical characteristics. Results may carry implications for targeted treatment approaches in HFpEF.

Comparison of Early and Long-Term Mortality in Patients With Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this study was to compare early and long-term mortality in patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (EF) undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). This meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Two investigators independently conducted a systematic and comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus from inception to July 15, 2023, using the search terms "reduced ejection fraction," "preserved ejection fraction," "coronary artery bypass surgery," and "mortality." Boolean operators (AND, OR) were used with medical subject heading (MeSH) terms to refine the search. The reference lists of all included articles were manually searched to identify potentially relevant studies. We restricted our search to studies published in the English language. The outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included short-term mortality (including in-hospital and 30-day mortality) and long-term mortality. A total of five studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sample size is 94,399 participants. Pooled analysis showed that the risk of early mortality was significantly higher in patients with reduced EF compared to patients with preserved EF (risk ratio, RR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.50 to 3.06). The pooled analysis also reported that late mortality was significantly higher in patients with reduced EF compared to patients with preserved EF (RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.35 to 2.08). The pooled analysis of studies demonstrated a significantly higher rate of both early and late mortality in patients with reduced EF, emphasizing the importance of EF assessment in risk stratification for CABG patients.

The prognostic impact of specialist cardiology input in patients admitted for heart failure and normal ejection fraction.

AIMS: Specialist cardiology care is associated with a prognostic benefit in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) admitted with decompensated HF. However, up to one third of patients admitted with HF and normal ejection fraction (HFnEF) do not receive specialist cardiology input. Whether this has prognostic implications is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on patients hospitalized with HFnEF from two tertiary centres were analysed. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality during follow-up. The secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality. A total of 1413 patients were included in the study. Of these, 23% (n = 322) did not receive in-hospital specialist cardiology input. Patients seen by a cardiologist were less likely to have hypertension (73% vs. 79%, P = 0.03) and respiratory co-morbidities (25% vs. 31%, P = 0.02) compared with those who did not receive specialist input. Similarly, clinical presentation was more severe for those who received specialist input (New York Heart Association III/IV 83% vs. 75% respectively, P = 0.003; moderate-to-severe peripheral oedema 65% vs. 54%, P < 0.001). Medical management was similar, except for a higher use of diuretics (90% vs. 86%, P = 0.04) and a longer length of stay for patients who received specialist input (9 vs. 4 days, P < 0.001). Long-term outcomes were comparable between patients who received specialist input and those who did not. However, specialist input was independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio 0.19, confidence interval 0.09-0.43, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital cardiology specialist input has no long-term prognostic advantage in patients with HFnEF but is independently associated with reduced in-hospital mortality.

Correlation between frailty and cardiac structure and function in echocardiography in elderly patients with normal ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to accurately evaluate the cardiac structure and function of the frail population in elderly patients with normal ejection fraction (EF) using the 3D volume quantification and speckle tracking of echocardiography, to explore the correlation between frailty and cardiac structure and function. METHODS: A total of 350 elderly aged 65 and above in-patients, excluding those with congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, and severe valvular heart disease, were included in the study. Patients were divided into non-frail, pre-frail, and frail group. Echocardiography techniques including speckle tracking and 3D volume quantification, were used to analyze the cardiac structure and function of the study subjects. Comparative analysis was statistically significant if P < 0.05. RESULTS: The cardiac structure of the frail group was different compared with non-frail patients, the frail group demonstrated increased left ventricular myocardial mass index (LVMI), but decreased stroke volume. Cardiac function was also impaired in the frail group: reservoir strain and conduit strain of left atrium, strain of right ventricular (RV) free wall, strain of RV septum, 3D EF of RV, and global longitudinal strain of LV were significantly decreased. Frailty was significantly and independently associated with LV hypertrophy (OR 1.889; 95% CI 1.240,2.880; P = 0.003), LV diastolic dysfunction (OR 1.496; 95% CI 1.016,2.203; P = 0.041), left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) reduction (OR 1.697; 95% CI 1.192, 2.416; P = 0.003), and reduced RV systolic function (OR 2.200; 95% CI 1.017, 4.759; P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Frailty is closely associated with several heart structural and functional alterations, which not only manifested as LV hypertrophy and reduced LV systolic function, but also decreased LV diastolic function, RV systolic function, and left atrial systolic function. Frailty is an independent risk factor for LV hypertrophy, LV diastolic dysfunction, LVGLS reduction, and reduced RV systolic function. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000033419. Date of registration: May 31, 2020.

Large left ventricular thrombus surgically resected in a patient with normal ejection: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: A left ventricular thrombus is very rare in a patient with normal systolic function. We are reporting a case of left ventricular thrombus in a patient with an abnormal presentation and normal ejection fraction. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 57-year-old female patient presented with severe epigastric and central abdominal pain associated with nausea, vomiting, constipation, and a decrease in appetite. Post-contrast abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan revealed multiple splenic infarcts. On echocardiographic study, a huge hyperechogenic, mobile mass was seen attached to the septo-apical wall of the left ventricle measuring 20 mm × 40 mm. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also showed transmural late gadolinium enhancement in the apex which is suggestive of small myocardial infarction in the distal left anterior descending territory. Coronary angiogram showed non-occluded coronaries. The patient was treated surgically due to the urgency of the situation and the high risk of embolization. DISCUSSION: Our patient was on both progesterone and high dose tofacitinib. It is hypothesised that patient most likely experienced asymptomatic myocardial injury with non-occluded coronaries (MINOCA) weeks prior to the presentation. Involvement of distal left anterior descending artery caused apical akinesia resulting in blood stasis. Accompanying subendocardial injury and hypercoagulable state, due to being on progesterone and tofacitinib, led to the formation of the left ventricular thrombus. CONCLUSION: Due to the serious outcomes associated with an untreated left ventricular thrombus, it is necessary to carefully assess all patients suffering from systemic embolism with echocardiogram. Assessing the left ventricular mass with MRI was crucial to understanding the nature of the mass. Size, mobility, and protruding nature where characteristics that warranted urgent surgical intervention due to the high risk of embolization. Finally, it is important to note that tofacitinib might be a new suspect for left ventricular clots.

The impact of an integrated heart failure service in a medium-sized district general hospital.

OBJECTIVES: Assessing the impact of a new integrated heart failure service (IHFS) in a medium-sized district general hospital (DGH) on heart failure (HF) mortality, readmission rates, and provision of HF care. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study encompassing all patients admitted with a diagnosis of HF over two 12-month periods before (2012/2013), and after (2015/2016) IHFS establishment. RESULTS: Total admissions for HF increased by 40% (385 vs 540), with a greater number admitted to the cardiology ward (231 vs 121). After IHFS implementation, patients were more likely to see a cardiologist (35.1% vs 43.7%, p=0.009), undergo echocardiography (70.1% vs 81.5%, p<0.001), be initiated on all three disease modifying HF medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA)) in the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) group (42% vs 99%, p<0.001) and receive specialist HF input (81.6% vs 85.4%, p=0.2). Both 30-day post-discharge mortality and HF related readmissions were significantly lower in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (8.9% vs 3.1%, p=0.032, 58% reduction, p=0.043 respectively) with no-significant reductions in all other HF groups. In-patient mortality was similar. Length of stay in Cardiology wards increased from 8.4 to 12.7 days (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Establishment of an IHFS within a DGH with limited resources and only a modest service re-design has resulted in significantly improved provision of specialist in-patient care, use of HFrEF medications, early heart failure nurse follow-up, and is associated with a reduction in early mortality, particularly in the HFpEF cohort, and HF related readmissions.

Hospital meal intake in acute heart failure patients and its association with long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Risk prediction for hospitalised heart failure (HF, HHF) patients remains suboptimal. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of hospital food intake (FI) immediately before discharge among HHF patients. METHOD: We analysed the data of 255 HHF patients extracted from the records of a single university hospital. The FI percentage of the three meals the day before hospital discharge was averaged. Patients were stratified into adequate FI (100% consumption) and inadequate FI (less than 100% consumption) groups. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality and/or HF readmission within 1 year. RESULTS: Only 49.3% of HHF patients consumed 100% of their meals. Patients with inadequate FI were older; predominantly women; and had a lower body mass index, higher brain natriuretic peptide levels and Clinical Frailty Scale scores at discharge than those with adequate FI. Inadequate FI was significantly associated with adverse outcomes after adjustments (HR 2.00; 95% CI 1.09 to 3.67; p=0.026). The effect of interaction by ejection fraction (EF) was highly significant: HF with preserved EF (≥40%) was significantly associated with inadequate FI with adverse outcomes (HR 4.95; 95% CI 1.71 to 14.36; p=0.003) but HF with reduced EF (<40%) was not (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.31 to 1.95; p=0.590). CONCLUSIONS: The hospital FI assessment might be a simple, useful tool for predicting and stratifying risk for HHF patients.

Prognostic impacts of changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Background: It has been reported that recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with better prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced EF (rEF). However, change of LVEF has not yet been investigated in cases of HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). Methods and results: Consecutive 1082 HFpEF patients, who had been admitted to hospital due to decompensated HF (EF >50% at the first LVEF assessment at discharge), were enrolled, and LVEF was reassessed within 6 months in the outpatient setting (second LVEF assessment). Among the HFpEF patients, LVEF of 758 patients remained above 50% (pEF group), 138 patients had LVEF of 40%-49% (midrange EF, mrEF group) and 186 patients had LVEF of less than 40% (rEF group). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, younger age and presence of higher levels of troponin I were predictors of rEF (worsened HFpEF). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cardiac event rate of the groups progressively increased from pEF, mrEF to rEF (log-rank, p<0.001), whereas all-cause mortality did not significantly differ among the groups. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, rEF (vs pEF) was not a predictor of all-cause mortality, but an independent predictor of increased cardiac event rates (HR 1.424, 95% CI 1.020 to 1.861, p=0.039). Conclusion: An initial assessment of LVEF and LVEF changes are important for deciding treatment and predicting prognosis in HFpEF patients. In addition, several confounding factors are associated with LVEF changes in worsened HFpEF patients.

Sudden Arrhythmic Death at the Higher End of the Heart Failure Spectrum.

The risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is high in heart failure (HF) patients. Sudden arrhythmic death (SAD) is a frequent cause of exit in HF patients at the lower end of the HF spectrum, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators have been recommended to prevent these life-threatening rhythm disturbances in select patients. However, less is known regarding the cause of SCD in patients at the upper end of the HF spectrum, despite the fact that the majority of out-of-hospital SCD victims have unknown or near-normal/normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In this review, we report the epidemiology, summarize the mechanisms, discuss the diagnostic challenges, and propose a stepwise approach for the prevention of SAD in HF with near-normal/normal LVEF.

Electrocardiographic characteristics in patients with heart failure and normal ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about ECG abnormalities in patients with heart failure and normal ejection fraction (HeFNEF) and how they relate to different etiologies or outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched the literature for peer-reviewed studies describing ECG abnormalities in HeFNEF other than heart rhythm alone. Thirty five studies were identified and 32,006 participants. ECG abnormalities reported in patients with HeFNEF include atrial fibrillation (prevalence 12%-46%), long PR interval (11%-20%), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH, 10%-30%), pathological Q waves (11%-18%), RBBB (6%-16%), LBBB (0%-8%), and long JTc (3%-4%). Atrial fibrillation is more common in patients with HeFNEF compared to those with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HeFREF). In contrast, long PR interval, LVH, Q waves, LBBB, and long JTc are more common in patients with HeFREF. A pooled effect estimate analysis showed that QRS duration ≥120 ms, although uncommon (13%-19%), is associated with worse outcomes in patients with HeFNEF. CONCLUSIONS: There is high variability in the prevalence of ECG abnormalities in patients with HeFNEF. Atrial fibrillation is more common in patients with HeFNEF compared to those with HeFREF. QRS duration ≥120 ms is associated with worse outcomes in patients with HeFNEF. Further studies are needed to address whether ECG abnormalities correlate with different phenotypes in HeFNEF.

Non-invasive intraventricular pressure differences estimated with cardiac MRI in subjects without heart failure and with heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction.

Objective: Non-invasive assessment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic and systolic function is important to better understand physiological abnormalities in heart failure (HF). The spatiotemporal pattern of LV blood flow velocities during systole and diastole can be used to estimate intraventricular pressure differences (IVPDs). We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of an MRI-based method to calculate systolic and diastolic IVPDs in subjects without heart failure (No-HF), and with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: We studied 159 subjects without HF, 47 subjects with HFrEF and 32 subjects with HFpEF. Diastolic and systolic intraventricular flow was measured using two-dimensional in-plane phase-contrast MRI. The Euler equation was solved to compute IVPDs in diastole (mitral base to apex) and systole (apex to LV outflow tract). Results: Subjects with HFpEF demonstrated a higher magnitude of the early diastolic reversal of IVPDs (-1.30 mm Hg) compared with the No-HF group (-0.78 mm Hg) and the HFrEF group (-0.75 mm Hg; analysis of variance p=0.01). These differences persisted after adjustment for clinical variables, Doppler-echocardiographic parameters of diastolic filling and measures of LV structure (No-HF=-0.72; HFrEF=-0.87; HFpEF=-1.52 mm Hg; p=0.006). No significant differences in systolic IVPDs were found in adjusted models. IVPD parameters demonstrated only weak correlations with standard Doppler-echocardiographic parameters. Conclusions: Our findings suggest distinct patterns of systolic and diastolic IVPDs in HFpEF and HFrEF, implying differences in the nature of diastolic dysfunction between the HF subtypes.

Echocardiographic subtypes of heart failure in consecutive hospitalised patients with dyspnoea.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) involves half of hospitalised patients with heart failure (HF), but estimates vary due to unclear diagnostic criteria. We performed a prospective observational study of hospitalised patients admitted with dyspnoea. The aim was to apply contemporary guidelines to diagnose HF due to valvular disease (HFvhd), HF due to reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF due to midrange EF (HFmrEF) and HFpEF in relation to presumed cardiac or non-cardiac dyspnoea. Methods: We included consecutive hospitalised patients with presumed HF or dyspnoea and excluded patients with acute coronary syndrome, estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m² or low NT-proBNP (<296 ng/L). Higher age-adjusted NT-proBNP values excluded patients with presumptive non-cardiac dyspnoea. Contemporary criteria for HFpEF and diastolic dysfunction were assessed, and we adjudicated whether acute decompensated HF (ADHF) had been the primary diagnosis. Results: Of 707 eligible patients, we included 370 patients of whom 75 had non-cardiac dyspnoea. Of these, 10% (38/370) had no cardiac dysfunction. Cardiac dysfunction consisted of 18.4%, HFvhd, 30.1% HFrEF, 10.2% HFmrEF and 41.3% HFpEF. HFpEF was twice as common in presumptive non-cardiac dyspnoea versus cardiac dyspnoea (71% vs 34%, p<0.0001). However, adjudicated ADHF was the primary diagnosis in 80% of HFrEF, 62% of HFmrEF and just 28% of HFpEF. Conclusion: HF according to contemporary criteria applied to 90% of patients admitted with dyspnoea and elevated NT-proBNP irrespective of the presumptive cause of dyspnoea, of whom 10% had HFmrEF and 41% HFpEF. However, significant non-cardiac diagnoses related to 9 out of 10 with HFpEF with pulmonary disease as the predominant adjudicated problem.

Cornell product is an ECG marker of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVE: ECG markers of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are lacking. We hypothesised that the Cornell product (CP) is a risk marker of HFpEF and has prognostic utility in HFpEF. METHODS: CP =[(amplitude of R wave in aVL+depth of S wave in V3)×QRS] was measured on baseline 12-lead ECG in a prospective Asian population-based study of 606 healthy controls (aged 55±10 years, 45% men), 221 hypertensive controls (62±9 years, 58% men) and 242 HFpEF (68±12 years, 49% men); all with EF ≥50% and followed for 2 years for all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisations. RESULTS: CP increased across groups from healthy controls to hypertensive controls to HFpEF, and distinguished between HFpEF and hypertension with an optimal cut-off of ≥1800 mm*ms (sensitivity 40%, specificity 85%). Age, male sex, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate were independent predictors of CP ≥1800 mm*ms, and CP was associated with echocardiographic E/e' (r=0.27, p<0.01) and left ventricular mass index (r=0.46, p<0.01). Adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic variables and log N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), CP ≥1800 mm*ms was significantly associated with HFpEF (adjusted OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.0 to 7.0). At 2-year follow-up, there were 29 deaths and 61 HF hospitalisations, all within the HFpEF group. Even after adjusting for log NT-proBNP, clinical and echocardiographic variables, CP ≥1800 mm*ms remained strongly associated with a higher composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisations (adjusted HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.5). CONCLUSION: The Cornell product is an easily applicable ECG marker of HFpEF and predicts poor prognosis by reflecting the severity of diastolic dysfunction and LV hypertrophy.

Improving risk stratification in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction by combining two validated risk scores.

Introduction: The Intermountain Risk Score (IMRS) was developed and validated to predict short-term and long-term mortality in hospitalised patients using demographics and commonly available laboratory data. In this study, we sought to determine whether the IMRS also predicts all-cause mortality in patients hospitalised with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and whether it is complementary to the Get with the Guidelines Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) risk score or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Methods and results: We used the Stanford Translational Research Integrated Database Environment to identify 3847 adult patients with a diagnosis of HFpEF between January 1998 and December 2016. Of these, 580 were hospitalised with a primary diagnosis of acute HFpEF. Mean age was 76±16 years, the majority being female (58%), with a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus (36%) and a history of coronary artery disease (60%). Over a median follow-up of 2.0 years, 140 (24%) patients died. On multivariable analysis, the IMRS and GWTG-HF risk score were independently associated with all-cause mortality (standardised HRs IMRS (1.55 (95% CI 1.27 to 1.93)); GWTG-HF (1.60 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.01))). Combining the two scores, improved the net reclassification over GWTG-HF alone by 36.2%. In patients with available NT-proBNP (n=341), NT-proBNP improved the net reclassification of each score by 46.2% (IMRS) and 36.3% (GWTG-HF). Conclusion: IMRS and GWTG-HF risk scores, along with NT-proBNP, play a complementary role in predicting outcome in patients hospitalised with HFpEF.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy reverses severe dyspnea associated with acceleration-dependent left bundle branch block in a patient with structurally normal heart.

A 55-year-old woman presented with severe dyspnea during acceleration-dependent left bundle branch block (LBBB). Metoprolol initially ameliorated symptoms by preventing the heart rate at which LBBB occurred. Over time LBBB presented at slower heart rates and the patient developed recurrent dyspnea during an activity that correlated with the development of LBBB on event monitors and exercise stress testing. A biventricular pacemaker was implanted, and the patient's symptoms remain resolved after a follow-up of over 4 years. More research is needed to define the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with normal heart function.

Effect of increased inspired oxygen on exercise performance in patients with heart failure and normal ejection fraction.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated whether increased concentrations of inspired oxygen (Fio2) affects exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure and normal ejection fraction (HeFNEF). METHODS: 46 patients (mean age 75 years (63% male) and median NTproBNP 1432 (interquartile range: 543-2378 ng/l)) with HeFNEF (defined as signs or symptoms of heart failure requiring treatment with diuretics, with a left ventricular ejection fraction of >45% by echocardiography and amino terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) >220 ng/l) completed three maximal incremental exercise tests with different Fio2 (21%, 28% and 40%) in random order. Fio2 was controlled by investigator but blinded to patients. The primary outcome was exercise time (ET). RESULTS: Increasing Fio2 significantly increased exercise time (522 ±â€¯180 seconds for 21% to 543 ±â€¯176 seconds, and 542 ±â€¯177 seconds, for 28% and 40%, respectively, P = 0.04) with no difference in peak workload (57 ±â€¯25 W, 58 ±â€¯25 W and 57 ±â€¯25 W, for 21%, 28% and 40%, respectively, P = 0.50). There was an increase in oxygen saturation but no change in peak heart rate with increasing Fio2. Compared to patients with LVEF ≥50%, patients with LVEF between 45 and 49% had a significantly greater exercise time and peak workload. There was a correlation between the difference in exercise time between Fio2 21% and 40% and age; but not with BMI, haemoglobin, creatinine or NTproBNP. CONCLUSION: Increasing Fio2 during exertion leads to a small increase in exercise time in patients with HeFNEF.

Elevated serum levels of cardiovascular biomarkers are associated with progression of renal cancer.

Objective: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a hypervascular tumour due to high constitutive production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is activated by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). Elevated levels of cardiovascular peptides, including brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), have been reported in patients with cancer, regardless of whether they have overt cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that hypoxia stimulates BNP production by an HIF-dependent manner. However, the clinical implications of such cardiovascular peptides in patients with RCC have not been assessed. Methods: In patients with clear cell RCC who underwent nephrectomy, we investigated the relationship between the serum level of BNP or N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) and various clinicopathological characteristics, including serum VEGF and expression of BNP and HIF-2 alpha in the primary tumour. Results: Elevated preoperative serum levels of BNP, NT-proBNP and VEGF, as well as increased tumour expression of HIF-2 alpha, were associated with a worse performance status, local invasion, distant metastasis and shorter overall survival. HIF-2 alpha expression showed a positive correlation with the preoperative serum VEGF level, while there was no relation between the serum levels of BNP/NT-proBNP and VEGF or tumour expression of HIF-2 alpha. BNP expression was very low in both tumour tissues and normal kidney tissues. Serum levels of BNP, NT-proBNP and VEGF all decreased significantly after nephrectomy. Conclusions: Our findings suggested that the preoperative serum levels of BNP and NT-proBNP are markers of tumour progression, as well as indicators of subclinical functional and structural myocardial damage in patients with advanced RCC.

2-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography predicts severe coronary artery disease in women with normal left ventricular function: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Women who have coronary artery disease (CAD) often present with atypical symptoms that may lead to misdiagnosis. We assessed strain, systolic strain rate and left ventricular dyssynchrony with 2- dimensional- speckle tracking echocardiography to evaluate its use as a non-invasive method for detecting CAD in women with normal ejection fraction compared with healthy women controls with a normal angiogram. METHODS: We included 35 women with CAD confirmed by coronary angiography and a positive exercise stress echocardiography and 35 women in a control group with a low pretest probability of CAD, normal angiogram and a normal stress echocardiography with normal EF. RESULTS: Statistically significant 2D-STE findings for the CAD vs control groups were as follows for the mean of: global circumferential strain (CS) (-19.4% vs -22.4%, P = .02); global radial S (49% vs 34%, P = .03); global radial SR (2.4 s-1 vs 1.9 s-1, P = .05); global longitudinal LV S (GLS) (-14.3% vs -17.2%, P < .001). For mechanical dyssynchrony, SD of the GLS time-to-peak (TTP) was computed (99 vs 33 ms, P < .001). The receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. A cutoff value of 45 ms for 1 SD of the longitudinal S TTP had 97% sensitivity and 89% specificity (AUC, 0.96). GLS cutoff value of -15.87% had 71% sensitivity and 74% specificity; AUC, 0.74 in differentiating CAD and control groups. The combined GLS, CS, and SD of the longitudinal S TTP had an AUC of 0.96 (sensitivity 97%, specificity 86%). Interclass correlations of the GLS segment and GLS TTP measurements were 0.49 (95% CI, 0.227-0.868) and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.277-0.926), respectively. CONCLUSION: In women with a normal echocardiogram and LVEF, CAD can be identified by dyssynchrony and abnormal strain values, as evidenced by 2D-STE.