Intervention model under the Omaha system framework can effectively improve the sleep quality and negative emotion of patients with mid to late-stage lung cancer and is a protective factor for quality of life.

This study aims to evaluate the effects of Omaha System framework interventions on quality of life, emotional well-being, and sleep quality in 507 mid to late-stage lung cancer patients. Retrospectively, we compared data of 294 patients receiving conventional care (conventional group) with 213 patients undergoing Omaha System interventions (intervention group) from January 2019 to January 2023. Key indicators included quality of life (FACT-L), anxiety (SAS), depression (SDS), sleep quality (PSQI), hope (HHS), and dignity (PDI). Post-intervention, the intervention group showed a significant increase in FACT-L scores (P<0.001), indicating enhanced quality of life. There was a notable reduction in PSQI scores (P<0.001), suggesting improved sleep quality. Additionally, their anxiety and depression levels significantly decreased, as evidenced by lower SAS (P<0.001) and SDS scores (P<0.001). Logistic regression revealed that care nursing intervention scheme (P=0.007), age (P=0.008), marital status (P=0.002), per capita monthly household income (P=0.004), SAS after intervention (P=0.002), and PSQI after intervention (P=0.002) had a positive influence on quality of life. In conclusion, the Omaha System interventions markedly improved the quality of life, emotional state, and sleep in lung cancer patients.

Efficacy of an Omaha system-based remote ergonomic intervention program on self-reported work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) - A randomized controlled study.

Purpose: Heavy biomechanical loadings at workplaces may lead to high risks of work-related musculoskeletal disorders. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of an Omaha System-based remote ergonomic intervention program on self-reported work-related musculoskeletal disorders among frontline nurses. Materials and methods: From July to October 2020, 94 nurses with self-reported pain in one of the three body parts, i.e., neck, shoulder, and low back, were selected and were randomly divided into two groups. The intervention group received a newly developed remote program, where the control group received general information and guidance on health and life. Program outcome was evaluated by a quick exposure check approach. Results: After 6 weeks, the intervention group exhibited significantly less stress in the low back, neck, and shoulder/forearms, compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In addition, the occurrence of awkward postures, such as extreme trunk flexion or twisting, was also significantly reduced (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The newly developed Omaha System-based remote intervention program may be a valid alternative to traditional programs for frontline nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic, reducing biomechanical loadings and awkward postures during daily nursing operations.

Effects of an Omaha System-based follow-up regimen on self-care and quality of life in gastrointestinal surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Currently, a variety of new nursing methods and routine nursing have been widely used in the nursing of gastrointestinal surgery patients. AIM: To investigate the effect of follow-up protocol based on the Omaha System on self-care ability and quality of life of gastrointestinal surgery patients. METHODS: A total of 128 patients with inflammatory bowel disease in gastrointestinal surgery in gastrointestinal surgery from March 2019 to August 2021 were divided into A (n = 64) and B (n = 64) groups according to different nursing methods. The group A received a follow-up program Omaha System-based intervention of the group B, whereas the group B received the routine nursing intervention. Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire, Crohn's and Colitis Knowledge Score (CCKNOW), inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ), Exercise of Self-nursing Agency Scale (ESCA), The Modified Mayo Endoscopic Score, and Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Following the intervention, the group A were facing score significantly increased than group B, while the avoidance and yield scores dropped below of group B (all P < 0.05); in group A, the level of health knowledge, personal care abilities, self-perception, self-awareness score and ESCA total score were more outstanding than group B (all P < 0.05); in group A the frequency of defecation, hematochezia, endoscopic performance, the total evaluation score by physicians and the disease activity were lower than group B (all P < 0.05); in the group A, the total scores of knowledge in general, diet, drug, and complication and CCKNOW were higher than group B (all P < 0.05); in group A, the necessity of taking medicine, score of medicine concern and over-all score of BMQ were more significant than group B (all P < 0.05); at last in the group A, the scores of systemic and intestinal symptoms, social and emotional function, and IBDQ in the group A were higher than group B (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: For gastrointestinal surgery patients, the Omaha System-based sequel protocol can improve disease awareness and intervention compliance, help them to face the disease positively, reduce disease activity, and improve patients' self-nursing ability and quality of life.

Using data visualization to characterize whole-person health of public health nurses.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize patterns in whole-person health of public health nurses (PHNs). DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Survey of a convenience sample of PHNs (n = 132) in 2022. PHNs self-identified as female (96.2%), white (86.4%), between the ages 25-44 (54.5%) and 45-64 (40.2%), had bachelor's degrees (65.9%) and incomes of $50-75,000 (30.3%) and $75-100,000/year (29.5%). MEASUREMENTS: Simplified Omaha System Terms (SOST) within the MyStrengths+MyHealth assessment of whole-person health (strengths, challenges, and needs) across Environmental, Psychosocial, Physiological, and Health-related Behaviors domains. RESULTS: PHNs had more strengths than challenges; and more challenges than needs. Four patterns were discovered: (1) inverse relationship between strengths and challenges/needs; (2) Many strengths; (3) High needs in Income; (4) Fewest strengths in Sleeping, Emotions, Nutrition, and Exercise. PHNs with Income as a strength (n = 79) had more strengths (t = 5.570, p < .001); fewer challenges (t = -5.270, p < .001) and needs (t = -3.659, p < .001) compared to others (n = 53). CONCLUSIONS: PHNs had many strengths compared to previous research with other samples, despite concerning patterns of challenges and needs. Most PHN whole-person health patterns aligned with previous literature. Further research is needed to validate and extend these findings toward improving PHN health.

Examining standardized consumer-generated social determinants of health and resilience data supported by Omaha System terminology.

Nursing terminologies like the Omaha System are foundational in realizing the vision of formal representation of social determinants of health (SDOH) data and whole-person health across biological, behavioral, social, and environmental domains. This study objective was to examine standardized consumer-generated SDOH data and resilience (strengths) using the MyStrengths+MyHealth (MSMH) app built using Omaha System. Overall, 19 SDOH concepts were analyzed including 19 Strengths, 175 Challenges, and 76 Needs with additional analysis around Income Challenges. Data from 919 participants presented an average of 11(SD = 6.1) Strengths, 21(SD = 15.8) Challenges, and 15(SD = 14.9) Needs. Participants with at least one Income Challenge (n = 573) had significantly (P < .001) less Strengths [9.4(6.4)], more Challenges [27.4(15.5)], and more Needs [15.1(14.9)] compared to without an Income Challenge (n = 337) Strengths [13.4(4.5)], Challenges [10.5(8.9)], and Needs [5.1(10.0)]. This standards-based approach to examining consumer-generated SDOH and resilience data presents a great opportunity in understanding 360-degree whole-person health as a step towards addressing health inequities.

Advantages and disadvantages of using theory-based versus data-driven models with social and behavioral determinants of health data.

OBJECTIVE: Theory-based research of social and behavioral determinants of health (SBDH) found SBDH-related patterns in interventions and outcomes for pregnant/birthing people. The objectives of this study were to replicate the theory-based SBDH study with a new sample, and to compare these findings to a data-driven SBDH study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using deidentified public health nurse-generated Omaha System data, 2 SBDH indices were computed separately to create groups based on SBDH (0-5+ signs/symptoms). The data-driven SBDH index used multiple linear regression with backward elimination to identify SBDH factors. Changes in Knowledge, Behavior, and Status (KBS) outcomes, numbers of interventions, and adjusted R-squared statistics were computed for both models. RESULTS: There were 4109 clients ages 13-40 years. Outcome patterns aligned with the original research: KBS increased from admission to discharge with Knowledge improving the most; discharge KBS decreased as SBDH increased; and interventions increased as SBDH increased. Slopes of the data-driven model were steeper, showing clearer KBS trends for data-driven SBDH groups. The theory-based model adjusted R-squared was 0.54 (SE = 0.38) versus 0.61 (SE = 0.35) for the data-driven model with an entirely different set of SBDH factors. CONCLUSIONS: The theory-based approach provided a framework to identity patterns and relationships and may be applied consistently across studies and populations. In contrast, the data-driven approach can provide insights based on novel patterns for a given dataset and reveal insights and relationships not predicted by existing theories. Data-driven methods may be an advantage if there is sufficiently comprehensive SBDH data upon which to create the data-driven models.

Synthesis of Long COVID Symptoms: An Evidence-Based Standardized Mapping Study With the Omaha System.

Background: In COVID-19 survivors, symptom burden is a significant and multifaceted personal and societal challenge. The Omaha system is a standardized terminology used by researchers and clinicians for documentation and analysis of meaningful data for whole-person health. Given the urgent need for a standardized symptom checklist specific to the long COVID population, the purpose of the present study was to identify long COVID symptoms from the published literature (native symptoms) and map those to the Omaha system signs/symptoms terms. Methods: The long COVID symptoms identified from 13 literatures were mapped to the Omaha system signs/symptoms, using an expert consensus approach. The criteria for mapping were that the long COVID signs/symptoms had to contain either a one-to-one match (exact meaning of the native terms and the signs/symptoms) or a partial match (similar but not exact meaning). Results: The synthesis of the 217 native symptoms of long COVID and mapping analysis to the Omaha problems and signs/symptoms level resulted in a combined, deduplicated, and standardized list of 74 signs/symptoms for 23 problems. Of these, 72 (97.3%) of native signs/symptoms were a full match at the problem level, and 67 (90.5%) of native signs/symptoms were a full or partial match at the sign/symptoms level. Conclusions: The present study is the first step in identifying a standardized evidence-based symptom checklist for long COVID patients. This checklist may be used in practice and research for assessment, tracking, and intervention planning as well as longitudinal analysis of symptom resolution and intervention effectiveness.

Feasibility of the Omaha system for the care of children with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Aim: To explore the feasibility of Omaha system theory in the care of children with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), which may provide a practical basis for the continuous nursing of DCM children. Methods: A total of 1,392 records describing symptoms, signs, and nursing interventions were extracted from the medical records of 76 children suffered from DCM. Content analysis method was used to find out existent nursing problems, make precise nursing plans, and take corresponding nursing measurements according to the medical records of DCM children. Cross-mapping method was utilized to compare the conceptual consistency of the medical records and Omaha system (problem classification and intervention subsystems). Results: Of the total 1,392 records, 1,094 (78.59%) were complete consistency, while 245 (17.60%) were partial consistency, and 53 (3.81%) were inconsistency with the Omaha system concepts. The concept matching degree of medical records and Omaha system was approximately 96.19%. Conclusions: The Omaha system may be an effective nursing language for Chinese DCM children, which may be useful to guide nurses in the care of DCM. Further well-design studies need to fully evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the Omaha system in nursing children with DCM.

Transitional and aftercare needs of persons recovering from COVID-19 using the Omaha System: A Scoping Review.

AIM: To identify and classify the transitional and aftercare needs of persons hospitalised with and recovering from COVID-19. BACKGROUND: Several studies exist that describe the patient needs at the acute phase of COVID-19. The transitional and aftercare needs that emerge during recovery, however, remain vague. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted and reported according to the PRISMA extension guidelines for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Primary studies were identified from database search. Narrative synthesis was undertaken, with the Omaha System as a framework. RESULTS: Forty studies were included. Persons recovering from the infection may have several needs in all domains of the Omaha System. Although the severity and persistence of the needs may be unrelated to the severity of the initial infection, they may vary based on factors such as age and pre-morbid factors. CONCLUSION: Recovering from COVID-19 is associated with varied biopsychosocial-environmental needs which can adversely affect the quality-of-life experience. The review findings represent an inventory of needs that can guide the development of multi-disciplinary post-acute or aftercare programmes. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Recovering from COVID-19 can be a protracted process requiring ongoing professional support after discharge. Policies are required to support the development and implementation of post-acute programmes of care. Comprehensive transitional and aftercare rehabilitative programmes are needed to support the recovery process.

The effect of nursing care based on human caring theory on posttraumatic growth in parentally bereaved adolescents: Action research.

PROBLEM: The death of a parent is a traumatic experience for adolescents. Studies to ensure post-traumatic growth in adolescents are limited. The aim of this study to evaluate the effect of nursing care based on Watson's Theory of Human Caring on posttraumatic growth in parentally bereaved adolescents. METHODS: This study was participatory action research. The study was carried out with four participants through online interviews. In the study, pre- and post-action data were obtained through individual interviews and scales. During the action process, nursing care based on the Theory of Human Caring was provided to the participants individually tracked through the Omaha System. Pre and post-action qualitative data were analyzed using the descriptive analysis method. In quantitative data, scale total and sub-scores were documented. FINDINGS: During the action, it was determined via Omaha System coding that the participants mostly experienced grief and mental health problems. In the pre-action, the participants stated that they experienced various difficulties regarding grief. In the post-action, the participants stated that the meaning of parental loss,its effects on life, and their ability to cope with loss changed and they experienced positive changes. In addition, when the scale scores of the participants' pre- and post-action were compared, it was found that the Mourning Scale scores decreased, and the Post-traumatic Growth Inventory scores increased. CONCLUSIONS: The result of this study demonstrate that nursing care based on Theory of Human Caring reduces the grief symptoms and contributes to post-traumatic growth in parentally bereaved adolescents.

Comparison of SIREN social needs screening tools and Simplified Omaha System Terms: informing an informatics approach to social determinants of health assessments.

OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies indicate that the social determinants of health (SDOH), conditions in which people work, play, and learn, account for 30%-55% of health outcomes. Many healthcare and social service organizations seek ways to collect, integrate, and address the SDOH. Informatics solutions such as standardized nursing terminologies may facilitate such goals. In this study, we compared one standardized nursing terminology, the Omaha System, in its consumer-facing form, Simplified Omaha System Terms (SOST), to social needs screening tools identified by the Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network (SIREN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using standard mapping techniques, we mapped 286 items from 15 SDOH screening tools to 335 SOST challenges. The SOST assessment includes 42 concepts across 4 domains. We analyzed the mapping using descriptive statistics and data visualization techniques. RESULTS: Of the 286 social needs screening tools items, 282 (98.7%) mapped 429 times to 102 (30.7%) of the 335 SOST challenges from 26 concepts in all domains, most frequently from Income, Home, and Abuse. No single SIREN tool assessed all SDOH items. The 4 items not mapped were related to financial abuse and perceived quality of life. DISCUSSION: SOST taxonomically and comprehensively collects SDOH data compared to SIREN tools. This demonstrates the importance of implementing standardized terminologies to reduce ambiguity and ensure the shared meaning of data. CONCLUSIONS: SOST could be used in clinical informatics solutions for interoperability and health information exchange, including SDOH. Further research is needed to examine consumer perspectives regarding SOST assessment compared to other social needs screening tools.

Prioritizing nutrition interventions for low-income clients receiving public health nurses' home visiting services: a latent class analysis study of Omaha System data.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify phenotypes of nutritional needs of home-visited clients with low income, and compare overall changes in knowledge, behavior, and status of nutritional needs before and after home visits by identified phenotypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Omaha System data collected by public health nurses from 2013 to 2018 were used in this secondary data analysis study. A total of 900 low-income clients were included in the analysis. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify phenotypes of nutrition symptoms or signs. Score changes in knowledge, behavior, and status were compared by phenotype. RESULTS: The five subgroups included Unbalanced Diet, Overweight, Underweight, Hyperglycemia with Adherence, and Hyperglycemia without Adherence. Only the Unbalanced Diet and Underweight groups showed an increase in knowledge. No other changes in behavior and status were observed in any of the phenotypes. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This LCA using standardized Omaha System Public Health Nursing data allowed us to identify phenotypes of nutritional needs among home-visited clients with low income and prioritize nutrition areas that public health nurses may focus on as part of public health nursing interventions. The sub-optimal changes in knowledge, behavior, and status suggest a need to re-examine the intervention details by phenotype and develop strategies to tailor public health nursing interventions to effectively meet the diverse nutritional needs of home-visited clients.

Algorithm development to improve intervention effectiveness for parents with mental health signs and symptoms.

OBJECTIVES: In this study we aimed to describe and compare groups formed by a rules-based algorithm to prospectively identify clients at risk of poor outcomes in order to guide tailored public health nursing (PHN) intervention approaches. DESIGN: Data-driven methods using standardized Omaha System PHN documentation. SAMPLE: Clients ages 13-40 who received PHN home visiting services for both the Caretaking/parenting and Mental health problems (N = 4109). MEASUREMENT: We applied a theory-based algorithm consisting of six rules using existing Omaha System data. We examined the groups formed by the algorithm using standard descriptive, inferential statistics, and Latent Class Analysis. RESULTS: Clients (N = 4109) were 25.1 (SD = 5.9) years old and had an average of 7.3 (SD = 3.2) problems, 250 (SD = 319) total interventions, and 32 (SD = 44) Mental health interventions. Overall outcomes improved after PHN interventions (p < .001 for all) and having more Mental health signs/symptoms was negatively associated with outcome scores (p < .001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: This algorithm may be helpful in identifying high-risk clients during a baseline assessment who may benefit from more intensive mental health interventions. Findings show there is value using the Omaha System for PHN documentation and algorithm clinical decision support development. Future research should focus on algorithm implementation in PHN clinical practice.

The identification of clusters of risk factors and their association with hospitalizations or emergency department visits in home health care.

AIMS: To identify clusters of risk factors in home health care and determine if the clusters are associated with hospitalizations or emergency department visits. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. METHODS: This study included 61,454 patients pertaining to 79,079 episodes receiving home health care between 2015 and 2017 from one of the largest home health care organizations in the United States. Potential risk factors were extracted from structured data and unstructured clinical notes analysed by natural language processing. A K-means cluster analysis was conducted. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to identify the association between clusters and hospitalizations or emergency department visits during home health care. RESULTS: A total of 11.6% of home health episodes resulted in hospitalizations or emergency department visits. Risk factors formed three clusters. Cluster 1 is characterized by a combination of risk factors related to "impaired physical comfort with pain," defined as situations where patients may experience increased pain. Cluster 2 is characterized by "high comorbidity burden" defined as multiple comorbidities or other risks for hospitalization (e.g., prior falls). Cluster 3 is characterized by "impaired cognitive/psychological and skin integrity" including dementia or skin ulcer. Compared to Cluster 1, the risk of hospitalizations or emergency department visits increased by 1.95 times for Cluster 2 and by 2.12 times for Cluster 3 (all p < .001). CONCLUSION: Risk factors were clustered into three types describing distinct characteristics for hospitalizations or emergency department visits. Different combinations of risk factors affected the likelihood of these negative outcomes. IMPACT: Cluster-based risk prediction models could be integrated into early warning systems to identify patients at risk for hospitalizations or emergency department visits leading to more timely, patient-centred care, ultimately preventing these events. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: There was no involvement of patients in developing the research question, determining the outcome measures, or implementing the study.

Interventions Employed By Licensed Nurses in Nursing Homes: Refinement and Validation of an Existing Omaha System Nursing Intervention Set.

Background and Purpose: Demands on long-term services and supports for older adults are growing, although geriatric workforce shortages have persisted for decades. Methods to define and quantify practice of licensed nurses in nursing homes are needed for work optimization within limited nurse resources available in nursing homes. This study aimed to refine and validate observable nursing interventions for nursing homes, using the Omaha System. Methods: Based on the existing corpus of Omaha System interventions for acute care nursing, this multi-phase, multi-method study included a mapping procedure of interviews from licensed nurses in nursing homes, the evaluation of content validity and coding of the interventions using a survey, and inter-observer reliability assessment using TimeCaT. Results: This study validated 57 observable interventions for nursing homes. Of the previously identified acute care nursing interventions, eight interventions were deemed out of scope. One additional intervention was identified. Refined intervention definitions were related to procedures common in acute care settings such as tracheal intubations/extubations and nasogastric tube insertion that were not performed in nursing homes. Expert agreement for content validity and coding of the interventions was high (S-CVI = 0.97), and inter-observer reliability levels (Cohen's κ value >0.4; proportion agreement >60%) were acceptable for all case studies. Implications for Practice: The validated observable Omaha System nursing interventions for nursing home practice have potential for use in future studies of nursing home practice to understand evidence-based practice, and gaps in care provided. The methodology may be extended to define observable interventions for other roles and settings.

INTERPROFESSIONAL ROLES AND COLLABORATIONS TO ADDRESS COVID-19 PANDEMIC CHALLENGES IN NURSING HOMES.

Nursing home experts and informatics nurses collaborated to develop guidelines for nursing homes that revealed partnership principles in action during the COVID-19 pandemic. This article describes efforts to define interprofessional nursing home staff roles within the partnership-based COVID-19 Response Guideline, and to examine changes in nursing practice compared to the pre-pandemic practice of nurses. The qualitative process of identification of nursing home staff roles revealed the extensive scope of interprofessional partnership needed to respond to the pandemic. Using the Omaha System structure, we compared these collective COVID-19 response interventions of Nursing Service roles with nursing interventions of RNs and LPN/LVNs defined in previous nursing home studies. This comparison showed the necessary transformation and collaboration among nurses needed for the pandemic response in nursing homes. The Omaha System Pandemic Guideline is available online and in the Omaha System Guidelines app for immediate use as COVID-19 response practice guidelines and references for interprofessional roles in nursing homes, as well as for multidisciplinary roles across diverse care settings. The guideline is an exemplar of how informatics can facilitate interprofessional and multidisciplinary partnership for nursing homes and other care settings. Future use of the guidelines for decision making and documentation related to infection prevention and control in nursing homes may improve care quality and health outcomes of residents and population.

An International Research Collaborative to Examine Global Health Resilience Using the MyStrengths+MyHealth Application.

International organizations have called for the development of programs to strengthen global health resilience. This poster describes the development of an international research collaborative to examine whole-person health and resilience using the web-based application MyStrengths+MyHealth (MSMH). MSMH enables individuals to self-report strengths (resilience), challenges, and needs using simplified terms that have been community validated and at the fourth grade US reading level.

Understanding Whole-Person Health and Resilience During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: A Cross-sectional and Descriptive Correlation Study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted an interest in whole-person health and emotional well-being. Informatics solutions through user-friendly tools such as mobile health apps offer immense value. Prior research developed a consumer-facing app MyStrengths + MyHealth using Simplified Omaha System Terms (SOST) to assess whole-person health. The MyStrengths + MyHealth app assesses strengths, challenges, and needs (SCN) for 42 concepts across four domains (My Living, My Mind and Networks, My Body, My Self-care; eg, Income, Emotions, Pain, and Nutrition, respectively). Given that emotional well-being was a predominant concern during the COVID-19 pandemic, we sought to understand whole-person health for participants with/without Emotions challenges. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to use visualization techniques and data from attendees at a Midwest state fair to examine SCN overall and by groups with/without Emotions challenges, and to explore the resilience of participants. METHODS: This cross-sectional and descriptive correlational study surveyed adult attendees at a 2021 Midwest state fair. Data were visualized using Excel and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS. RESULTS: The study participants (N=182) were primarily female (n=123, 67.6%), aged ≥45 years (n=112, 61.5%), White (n=154, 84.6%), and non-Hispanic (n=177, 97.3%). Compared to those without Emotions challenges, those with Emotions challenges were aged 18-44 (P<.001) years, more often female (P=.02), and not married (P=.01). Overall, participants had more strengths (mean 28.6, SD 10.5) than challenges (mean 12, SD 7.5) and needs (mean 4.2, SD 7.5). The most frequent needs were in Emotions, Nutrition, Income, Sleeping, and Exercising. Compared to those without Emotions challenges, those with Emotions challenges had fewer strengths (P<.001), more challenges (P<.001), and more needs (P<.001), along with fewer strengths for Emotions (P<.001) and for the cluster of health-related behaviors domain concepts, Sleeping (P=.002), Nutrition (P<.001), and Exercising (P<.001). Resilience was operationalized as correlations among strengths for SOST concepts and visualized for participants with/without an Emotions challenge. Those without Emotions challenges had more positive strengths correlations across multiple concepts/domains. CONCLUSIONS: This survey study explored a large community-generated data set to understand whole-person health and showed between-group differences in SCN and resilience for participants with/without Emotions challenges. It contributes to the literature regarding an app-aided and data-driven approach to whole-person health and resilience. This research demonstrates the power of health informatics and provides researchers with a data-driven methodology for additional studies to build evidence on whole-person health and resilience.

The Application of the Omaha System in Community Rehabilitation Nursing for Patients With Stroke and Previous Falls.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the use of the Omaha System in rehabilitation and nursing methods and the effects on patients within the community who had experienced stroke and previous falls. Methods: This study enrolled 42 patients who had experienced stroke and previous falls and had returned to the community after being discharged from the Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation of the Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January to July 2018. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: an experimental group (n = 21) and a control group (n = 21). Patients in the control group received routine community rehabilitation care, and patients in the experimental group received community rehabilitation care on the basis of the Omaha System. Intervention lasted for 1 year. The Omaha outcome score, the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) (measured via the Modified Barthel Index [MBI]), and the incidence of falls for each group were compared before and after the intervention. Results: After 1 year of intervention, the Omaha outcome score and MBI of both groups were higher than before; the Omaha outcome score and MBI of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group; the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). No fall occurred in either of the two groups. Conclusion: The Omaha System can comprehensively evaluate the health problems of patients, guide nursing intervention, and quantitatively evaluate the effect of nursing intervention; it is therefore worthy of promotion.

Documentation of hospitalization risk factors in electronic health records (EHRs): a qualitative study with home healthcare clinicians.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors home healthcare (HHC) clinicians associate with patient deterioration and understand how clinicians respond to and document these risk factors. METHODS: We interviewed multidisciplinary HHC clinicians from January to March of 2021. Risk factors were mapped to standardized terminologies (eg, Omaha System). We used directed content analysis to identify risk factors for deterioration. We used inductive thematic analysis to understand HHC clinicians' response to risk factors and documentation of risk factors. RESULTS: Fifteen HHC clinicians identified a total of 79 risk factors that were mapped to standardized terminologies. HHC clinicians most frequently responded to risk factors by communicating with the prescribing provider (86.7% of clinicians) or following up with patients and caregivers (86.7%). HHC clinicians stated that a majority of risk factors can be found in clinical notes (ie, care coordination (53.3%) or visit (46.7%)). DISCUSSION: Clinicians acknowledged that social factors play a role in deterioration risk; but these factors are infrequently studied in HHC. While a majority of risk factors were represented in the Omaha System, additional terminologies are needed to comprehensively capture risk. Since most risk factors are documented in clinical notes, methods such as natural language processing are needed to extract them. CONCLUSION: This study engaged clinicians to understand risk for deterioration during HHC. The results of our study support the development of an early warning system by providing a comprehensive list of risk factors grounded in clinician expertize and mapped to standardized terminologies.