Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 43(4): 261-266, Oct.-Dec. 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1528949

ABSTRACT

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of nefopam on postoperative pain control after anorectal surgeries. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent anorectal surgeries from January 2019 to March 2022 at two medical centers. The data were divided into nefopam and conventional groups. The primary outcome was the number of patients who requested additional opioids in the 24-h postoperative period. The secondary outcomes were numeric rating pain scores (NRPS) within a 24-h postoperative period and analgesic drugs-related side effects. Results: Eighty-seven patients in the conventional group and 60 in the nefopam group were recruited. The nefopam group reported less additional opioid consumption than the conventional group in all dimensions of analysis, including overall, adjusted to anesthetic techniques and types of surgery. However, these did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.093). Only patients in the nefopam group who underwent hemorrhoidectomy under TIVA or spinal anesthesia significantly required fewer additional opioids (P = 0.016, 60% mean difference). Similarly, the 24-h postoperative morphine consumption was lower in the nefopam group (mean difference = -3.4, 95%CI: 0.72,6.08). Furthermore, significantly lower NRPS were reported in the nefopam group during the 12-18 h postoperative period (P = 0.009). On the other hand, analgesic drugs related side effects were similar in both groups. Conclusions: The administration of nefopam after major anorectal surgery is beneficially evident in reducing postoperative opioid requirements. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Rectum/surgery , Colon/surgery , Nefopam/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative , Retrospective Studies , Anesthesia, Rectal
3.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 37(8): 1799-1806, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35796873

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: With increased awareness of the opioid epidemic, understanding contributing factors to postoperative opioid use is important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient and perioperative factors that contribute to postoperative opioid use after colorectal resections and their relation to pre-existing pain conditions and psychiatric diagnoses. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted identifying adult patients who underwent elective colorectal resection at a single tertiary center between 2015 and 2018. Patient demographics, preoperative factors, surgical approach, and perioperative pain management were evaluated to determine standard conversion morphine milligram equivalents required for postoperative days 0 to 3 and total hospital stay. RESULTS: Five hundred and ninety-two patients: 46% male, median age 58 years undergoing colorectal resections for indications including cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, and diverticulitis were identified. Less opioid use was found to be associated with female gender (ß = - 42), patients who received perioperative lidocaine infusion (ß = - 30), and older adults (equivalents/year) (ß = - 4, all p < 0.01). Preoperative opioid use, preoperative abdominal pain, epidural use, and smoking were all independently associated with increased postoperative opioid requirements. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients undergoing elective colorectal resection, factors that were associated with higher perioperative opioid use included male gender, smoking, younger age, preoperative opioid use, preoperative abdominal pain, and epidural use. Perioperative administration of lidocaine was associated with decreased opioid requirements. Understanding risk factors and stratifying postoperative pain regimens may aid in improved pain control and decrease long-term dependency.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Colorectal Neoplasms , Abdominal Pain , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Lidocaine/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Smoking/adverse effects
4.
J Pharm Pract ; 34(3): 423-427, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31537149

ABSTRACT

Providing adequate analgesia during burn wound care is essential to patient-centered care. Both oral and intravenous (IV) ketamine are often used for analgesia and sedation. Ketamine may improve analgesia and decrease opioid requirements for burn wound care. Oral ketamine wafers and tablets have been used as a safe alternative internationally but are unavailable in the United States. The purpose of this study was to compare opioid usage and patient satisfaction scores in patients with and without the use of oral injectable ketamine for burn wound care, with each patient serving as their own control. Ketamine, opioid, and benzodiazepine dosages recorded during dressing changes were compared to dressing changes without ketamine use that occurred before and after ketamine-associated sessions in each patient. Fourteen patients received oral ketamine at a median (interquartile range [IQR]) dose of 2.5 (2.2-2.7) mg/kg. Ketamine use significantly decreased opioid requirements when compared to wound care sessions that did not use ketamine both before (50 [IQR: 30-75] mg vs 75 [IQR: 46-91] mg median IV morphine equivalents, P = .0097) and after (50 [IQR: 30-75] mg vs 63 [IQR: 50-96] mg median IV morphine equivalents, P = .0042) the ketamine-associated sessions. One patient experienced hallucinations, and no adverse events were observed. Hence, oral administration of injectable ketamine was associated with a decrease in opioid requirements during dressing changes. Additionally, ketamine use improved patient satisfaction (P = .0034). Preliminary data suggest this promising analgesia method is safe and effective for burn wound care.


Subject(s)
Burns , Ketamine , Administration, Oral , Analgesics , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Bandages , Burns/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives
5.
J Perianesth Nurs ; 36(1): 8-13, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33153878

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This quality improvement project implemented an evidence-based multimodal analgesia protocol among patients undergoing outpatient spine surgery in an attempt to decrease postoperative opioid requirements, postoperative pain scores, and facility and postanesthesia care unit length of stay (LOS). DESIGN: Two independent samples were compared with a preimplementation and postimplementation design. There were 37 patients in the preimplementation group and 36 patients in the postimplementation group. METHODS: Data were collected by a retrospective chart review of neurosurgical patients undergoing spine surgery and included postoperative opioid requirements, postoperative pain scores, facility and postanesthesia care unit LOS, and the number of protocol components implemented on each patient. FINDINGS: Intraoperative and postoperative by mouth opioid requirements were significantly decreased postimplementation. Postoperative opioid requirements decreased, and postimplementation pain scores were reduced across all time points. LOS did not significantly change. CONCLUSIONS: This multimodal analgesia protocol significantly decreased opioid consumption among neurosurgical patients at this surgery center.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Analgesia , Spine , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Analgesia/methods , Analgesia/nursing , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/nursing , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies , Spine/surgery
6.
Bone Jt Open ; 1(7): 398-404, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33215130

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Currently, there is no single, comprehensive national guideline for analgesic strategies for total joint replacement. We compared inpatient and outpatient opioid requirements following total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine risk factors for increased inpatient and outpatient opioid requirements following total hip or knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Outcomes after 92 primary total knee (n = 49) and hip (n = 43) arthroplasties were analyzed. Patients with repeat surgery within 90 days were excluded. Opioid use was recorded while inpatient and 90 days postoperatively. Outcomes included total opioid use, refills, use beyond 90 days, and unplanned clinical encounters for uncontrolled pain. Multivariate modelling determined the effect of surgery, regional nerve block (RNB) or neuraxial anesthesia (NA), and non-opioid medications after adjusting for demographics, ength of stay, and baseline opioid use. RESULTS: TKAs had higher daily inpatient opioid use than THAs (in 5 mg oxycodone pill equivalents: median 12.0 vs 7.0; p < 0.001), and greater 90 day use (median 224.0 vs 100.5; p < 0.001). Opioid refills were more likely in TKA (84% vs 33%; p < 0.001). Patient who underwent TKA had higher independent risk of opioid use beyond 90 days than THA (adjusted OR 7.64; 95% SE 1.23 to 47.5; p = 0.01). Inpatient opioid use 24 hours before discharge was the strongest independent predictor of 90-day opioid use (p < 0.001). Surgical procedure, demographics, and baseline opioid use have greater influence on in/outpatient opioid demand than RNB, NA, or non-opioid analgesics. CONCLUSION: Opioid use following TKA and THA is most strongly predicted by surgical and patient factors. TKA was associated with higher postoperative opioid requirements than THA. RNB and NA did not diminish total inpatient or 90-day postoperative opioid consumption. The use of acetaminophen, gabapentin, or NSAIDs did not significantly alter inpatient opioid requirements.Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:398-404.

7.
China Pharmacy ; (12): 1985-1989, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-817219

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation of 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptor (5-HT2AR) rs6313 gene polymorphism with pain occurrence and opioid requirements in patients with lung cancer. METHODS: Totally 332 patients with lung cancer were selected from the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University during Dec. 2017-Jun. 2018 as lung cancer group. They were divided into pain group (177 cases) and painless group (155 cases) according to whether pain occurred. Totally 116 healthy persons who underwent physical examination in same period were selected as control group. The genotype of rs6313 locus of 5-HT2AR gene was detected by PCR-RFLP. The distribution of genotype was compared by χ2-test. The correlation of genotype with pain occurrence and degree, opioids requirements were investigated by Binary Logistic regression analysis, χ2-test and Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: CC, CT, TT genotypes were detected in rs6313 locus of 5-HT2AR gene. The frequency of above genotypes were 20.7%, 47.4%, 31.9%, 20.6%, 50.3%, 29.0% as well as 16.4%, 50.8%, 32.8%, respectively in control group, painless group and pain group. Their frequencies and allele frequencies were in line with Hardy-Weinberg balance (P>0.05). There was no statistical significance in genotype and allele frequencies between lung cancer group and control group (P>0.05). TNM staging (Ⅲ-Ⅳ stage) was associated with pain in lung cancer patients [OR=3.661, 95%CI (1.972,6.797), P<0.001]. Gender, age, height, body weight, pathological typing and rs6313 locus genotype had no correlation with pain (P>0.05). The genotype of this locus was not related to the degree of pain and the requirements for opioids in patients with lung cancer (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The polymorphism of 5-HT2AR gene rs6313 locus is no related to pain occurrence and opioid requirements in patients with lung cancer. Its polymorphism may not be the main cause of individual pain differences in lung cancer patients.

8.
J Transl Med ; 15(1): 77, 2017 04 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28410599

ABSTRACT

The vitamin C deficiency disease scurvy is characterised by musculoskeletal pain and recent epidemiological evidence has indicated an association between suboptimal vitamin C status and spinal pain. Furthermore, accumulating evidence indicates that vitamin C administration can exhibit analgesic properties in some clinical conditions. The prevalence of hypovitaminosis C and vitamin C deficiency is high in various patient groups, such as surgical/trauma, infectious diseases and cancer patients. A number of recent clinical studies have shown that vitamin C administration to patients with chronic regional pain syndrome decreases their symptoms. Acute herpetic and post-herpetic neuralgia is also diminished with high dose vitamin C administration. Furthermore, cancer-related pain is decreased with high dose vitamin C, contributing to enhanced patient quality of life. A number of mechanisms have been proposed for vitamin C's analgesic properties. Herein we propose a novel analgesic mechanism for vitamin C; as a cofactor for the biosynthesis of amidated opioid peptides. It is well established that vitamin C participates in the amidation of peptides, through acting as a cofactor for peptidyl-glycine α-amidating monooxygenase, the only enzyme known to amidate the carboxy terminal residue of neuropeptides and peptide hormones. Support for our proposed mechanism comes from studies which show a decreased requirement for opioid analgesics in surgical and cancer patients administered high dose vitamin C. Overall, vitamin C appears to be a safe and effective adjunctive therapy for acute and chronic pain relief in specific patient groups.


Subject(s)
Ascorbic Acid/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Animals , Ascorbic Acid Deficiency/complications , Humans , Pain/complications
9.
J Pharm Pract ; 29(5): 475-9, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25660585

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the impact of postoperative intravenous (IV) acetaminophen on opioid requirements and pain scores in patients following gynecologic procedures. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing gynecologic procedures was conducted to assess the impact of adding scheduled IV acetaminophen to postoperative analgesic regimens. The control group consisted of patients admitted prior to formulary addition of IV acetaminophen; the study group consisted of patients admitted after formulary addition of IV acetaminophen who received scheduled IV acetaminophen for at least the first 24 hours postoperatively. Opioid requirements 0 to 24 hours postoperatively served as the primary end point. Secondary end points included average pain score, cumulative acetaminophen dose, nonopioid analgesic requirements, and rate of adverse events 0 to 24 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-seven patients who underwent a gynecologic procedure from January 2009 to April 2013 were included in this study. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. In the first 24 hours postoperatively, there was no difference in opioid requirements between the groups (21 mg [interquartile range, IQR, 15-39.8 mg] vs 32.6 mg [IQR, 16.75-41 mg], P = 0.150). The average pain score and incidence of adverse events did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Postoperative administration of IV acetaminophen did not provide a significant opioid-sparing effect in patients undergoing gynecologic procedures.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Acetaminophen/adverse effects , Administration, Intravenous , Adult , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...