Variability in opioid conversion calculators in critically ill children transitioned from fentanyl to hydromorphone.

PURPOSE: Opioid conversion calculators (OCCs) are used to convert between opioids. The purpose of this study was to describe the variability in OCC results in critically ill children transitioned from fentanyl to hydromorphone infusions. METHODS: This was a descriptive, retrospective study. Seventeen OCCs were identified and grouped into 6 groups (groups 1-6) based on the equianalgesic conversions. The OCCs were used to calculate the hydromorphone rate in critically ill children (<18 years) converted from fentanyl to hydromorphone. Information from a previous study on children stabilized on hydromorphone (defined as the first 24-hour period with no change in the hydromorphone rates, <3 hydromorphone boluses administered, and 80% of State Behavior Scale scores between 0 and -1) were utilized. The primary objective was to compare the median hydromorphone rates calculated using the 17 OCCs. The secondary objective was to compare the percent variability of the OCC-calculated hydromorphone rates to the stabilization rate. RESULTS: Seventeen OCCs were applied to data on 28 children with a median age and hydromorphone rate of 2.4 years and 0.08 mg/kg/h, respectively. The median hydromorphone rate calculated using the 17 OCCs ranged from 0.06 to 0.12 mg/kg/h. Group 3 and group 6 OCCs resulted in a calculated hydromorphone rate that was higher than the stabilization rate in 96% and 75% of patients, respectively. Use of group 4 and group 5 OCCs resulted in a calculated hydromorphone rate that was lower than the stabilization rate in 64% and 75% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Given the considerable variability of OCCs, caution should be used when applying OCCs to critically ill children.

Routine Monitoring of QTc Interval as a Barrier for Efficient Use of Methadone in Palliative Care.

BACKGROUND: Methadone is a commonly prescribed opioid amongst cancer patients. It has unique pharmacological properties which can benefit in treating complex pain syndromes and neuropathic pain. However, strict guidelines have been created in a generalized manner for chronic pain and long-term survival patients. These guidelines, such as QT interval monitoring can lead to limitations for methadone use in patients with comfort-associated goals. We present two cases of patients with metastatic cancer who were treated for pain with methadone and had to undergo opioid rotation due to abnormal QT intervals. CASE DESCRIPTION: Case one was a female with open ulcerated wounds due to metastatic breast cancer who presented with uncontrolled pain on her current opioid regimen. She achieved pain relief when rotated to methadone but a repeat electrocardiogram a few months later showed QTc prolongation. She underwent opioid rotation with different medications, but her pain remained poorly controlled. Case two was a female with poorly controlled pain in the setting of bilateral breast cancer. She presented with concerns for opioid-induced neurotoxicity and was rotated to methadone. She achieved optimal pain relief. A few weeks later, her machine read QT interval was prolonged and she was rotated off methadone. The electrocardiogram was manually read which showed a normal QT interval and she was restarted on methadone with pain relief. CONCLUSION: In the palliative care setting, monitoring QTc per chronic pain guidelines may lead to uncontrolled pain and a significant impact on quality of life.

Opioid-induced Neurotoxicity in Patients with Cancer Pain.

OPINION STATEMENT: Opioid-induced neurotoxicity (OINT) is a neuropsychiatric syndrome observed with opioid therapy. The mechanism of OINT is thought to be multifactorial, and many risk factors may facilitate its development. If symptoms of OINT are seen, the prescriber should consider hydration, discontinuation of the offending opioid drug, or switching of opioid medication, or the use of some adjuvants. Multiple factors like inter- and intraindividual differences in opioid pharmacology may influence the accuracy of dose calculations for opioid switching. Experience and clinical judgment in a specialistic palliative care setting should be used and individual patient characteristics considered when applying any conversion table.

Retrospective Cohort Study of Safety Outcomes Associated with Opioid Rotations to Buprenorphine.

The objective of this study was to understand the effect buprenorphine rotations have on respiratory risk and other safety outcomes. This was a retrospective observational study evaluating Veterans who underwent an opioid rotation from full-agonist opioids to buprenorphine products or to alternative opioids. The primary endpoint was change in the Risk Index for Overdose or Serious Opioid-induced Respiratory Depression (RIOSORD) score from baseline to six months post-rotation. Median baseline RIOSORD scores were 26.0 and 18.0 in the Buprenorphine Group and the Alternative Opioid Group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in baseline RIOSORD score. At six months post-rotation, median RIOSORD scores were 23.5 and 23.0 in the Buprenorphine Group and Alternative Opioid Group, respectively. The difference in change in RIOSORD scores between groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.23). However, based on changes in RIOSORD risk class, an 11% and 0% decrease in respiratory risk was observed in the Buprenorphine and Alternative Opioid groups, respectively. This finding may be considered clinically significant given a change in risk was observed as predicted by RIOSORD score. Further research is needed to clarify the effect that opioid rotations have on respiratory depression risk and other safety outcomes.

Methadone rotation versus other opioid rotation for refractory cancer induced bone pain: protocol of an exploratory randomised controlled open-label study.

BACKGROUND: A third of patients with advanced cancer and bone metastasis suffer from cancer induced bone pain (CIBP), impeding quality of life, psychological distress, depression and anxiety. This study will evaluate the impact of an opioid rotation, comparing methadone rotation with other opioid rotation in patients with refractory CIBP. METHODS: This open-label randomised controlled trial will recruit cancer patients with CIBP and inadequate pain control despite established baseline opioid and/or intolerable opioid side effects from cancer and palliative care services. Participants will be at least 18 years old, with a predicted prognosis of greater than 8 weeks, meet the core diagnostic criteria for CIBP, have a worst pain score of ≥ 4 of 10 from CIBP and/ or have opioid toxicity (graded ≥ 2 on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). Participants will have sufficiently proficient English to complete questionnaires and provide informed consent. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to be rotated to methadone to another opioid. The primary objective is to examine the impact of opioid rotation in improving CIBP by comparing analgesic efficacy, safety and tolerability in the two arms. Secondary objectives will assess changes in the intensity, duration and frequency of breakthrough pain, requirement of breakthrough analgesia, overall opioid escalation index, and time taken to observe improvement in pain reduction, pain interference and quality of life. DISCUSSION: Laboratory studies suggest the involvement of neuropathic involvement in the mechanism of CIBP, though there remains no clear evidence of the routine use of neuropathic agents. Methadone as an analgesic agent may have a role to play in this cohort of patients, thus warranting further exploratory studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry No: ACTRN12621000141842. Registered 11 February 2021.

Levorphanol as a Second Line Opioid in Cancer Patients Presenting to an Outpatient Supportive Care Center: An Open-label Study.

CONTEXT: Levorphanol is a potent opioid agonist and NMDA receptor blocker with minimal drug interactions, and there are few reports of its use in cancer patients. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the frequency of successful opioid rotation (OR) to levorphanol and the median opioid rotation ratio (ORR) from Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD). METHODS: This is a prospective, single-group, interventional study. Cancer outpatients requiring an OR and receiving a MEDD of 60-300 mg were rotated to levorphanol using a ratio of 10:1 and assessed daily for 10-day. Successful OR was defined as a 2-point improvement in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) pain score on day 10 or achieving the personalized pain goal between days 3-10 in patients with uncontrolled pain or resolution of opioid side effects (OSE) in those undergoing OR for OSE alone. The ORR to levorphanol was calculated using net-MEDD (MEDD before OR minus the MEDD of the breakthrough opioid used along with levorphanol after OR). RESULTS: Forty patients underwent OR to levorphanol, and uncontrolled pain 35/40 (87.5%) was the most common indication. The median net-MEDD and levorphanol doses were 95 and 10 mg, respectively, and 33/40 (82.5%) had a successful OR with a median (IQR) ORR of 8.56 (7.5-10). Successful OR was associated with significant improvement in ESAS and OSE scale scores. There was a strong association between MEDD and levorphanol dose. CONCLUSION: This study provided preliminary data that cancer patients could be successfully rotated to levorphanol using an ORR of 8.5. Levorphanol was associated with improved pain and symptom control and was well- tolerated.

Opioid Rotation and Conversion Ratios Used by Palliative Care Professionals: An International Survey.

Background: The opioid rotation ratios (ORRs) and conversion ratios (CRs) used worldwide among palliative care (PC) professionals to perform opioid rotations (ORs) and route conversions may have a wide variation. Methods: We surveyed PC professionals on opioid ratios used through email to the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer's PC study group and Twitter and Facebook posts between September and November 2020. Results: We received 370 responses from respondents from 53 countries: 276 (76%) were physicians, 46 (13%) advanced practice providers, 39 (11%) pharmacists, and 9 respondents did not report their profession. There were statistically significant variations in median CR from intravenous (IV) to oral morphine (2-3), IV to oral hydromorphone (2-4.5), ORR from IV hydromorphone to oral morphine (10-20), and ORR from transdermal fentanyl mcg/hour to oral morphine (2-3.5) across various groups. Conclusion: This survey highlights the wide variation in ORRs and CRs among PC clinicians worldwide and the need for further research to standardize practice.

Methadone Switching for Cancer Pain: A New Classification of Initiation Protocols, Based on a Critical Literature Review.

Background: The initiation of methadone, a known effective analgesic for cancer pain, is complex. The existing protocols are often inadequately described; therefore, a classification of literature is needed. We reviewed and classified the recent literature on methadone initiation protocols in cancer patients experiencing severe pain. Objective: To provide a new classification of initiation protocols, based on a critical literature review. Data Sources: The MEDLINE database was searched for articles published until March 25, 2021, using the terms "cancer pain," "methadone," "methadone introduction," or "methadone initiation." The search was limited to human studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), other clinical trials, meta-analyses, and case reports. Selected articles were assessed for initiation details (rapid or progressive), administered dose (fixed rescue dose or ad libitum), and dose calculation (fixed or progressive ratios using morphine equivalent daily dose [MEDD] for daily or unitary dose). Results: Twenty-four publications that met our inclusion criteria were analyzed. No large-scale prospective double-blind RCTs with robust design were identified. Most studies assessed relatively small numbers of patients. Eight initiation types were identified, of which three involved seven "high quality" studies: "rapid switch-fixed doses and rescue dose-progressive daily ratio," "progressive switch-fixed dose and rescue dose-progressive daily ratio," and "rapid switch-ad libitum-fixed ratio for unitary dose" protocols. This classification provides the latest information on methadone initiation protocols. The total daily dose of methadone varied largely across protocols. Conclusion: We recommend a maximal daily methadone dose of 100 mg (3 doses of 30 mg or 5 doses of 20 mg) for MEDD <500 mg, when the two "ad libitum" protocols are used. Further clinical research on this topic is warranted.

Comparison of opioid rotation on pain, symptoms, and daily opioid dose in a supportive care clinic.

BACKGROUND: Opioid rotation (OR) is used to decrease patients' cancer-related pain and mitigate opioid-induced adverse effects. There is limited evidence regarding its effect on symptoms and morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD). The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of OR on pain scores, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Score (ESAS), and MEDD in patients with cancer. METHODS: Retrospective observational study in an outpatient supportive care clinic using a within-subject design to analyze data collected over 34 months. Study included 676 patients with 217 rotations identified in 128 patients at supportive care clinic at a National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Center. OR were identified and analysis compared the pre-visit data with the subsequent post-visit data following OR using paired t-tests. Primary endpoints included pain scores, total ESAS, and MEDD for OR and these endpoints were compared amongst rotations to specific opioid analgesics. RESULTS: Following OR, there was a statistically significant reduction in mean pain scores from 6.25 at the pre-visit to 5.75 following OR. Of the 194 ORs, 29.90% were successful in reducing patients' pain by either 30% or by 2-points. Only rotations to morphine, oxycodone, and methadone correlated with significant decreases in pain scores. Overall, OR did not correlate with significant changes in ESAS or MEDD. Only rotations to methadone correlated with a significant reduction in MEDD. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest OR is associated with decreased pain scores without increasing MEDD. Of the agents compared, only rotations to methadone correlated with both a significant reduction in pain scores and in MEDD.

Conversion From Continuous Infusion Fentanyl to Continuous Infusion Hydromorphone in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Opioid rotations from fentanyl to hydromorphone may reduce opioid/sedative exposure in critically ill children. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to determine the conversion percentage from fentanyl to hydromorphone infusions using equianalgesic conversions (0.1 mg fentanyl = 1.5 mg hydromorphone). Secondary objectives included identification of the median time and hydromorphone rate at stabilization (defined as the first 24-hour period no hydromorphone rates changed, 80% of State Behavioral Scale [SBS] scores between 0 and -1, and <3 hydromorphone boluses administered). Additional outcomes included a comparison of opioid/sedative requirements on the day of conversion versus the three 24-hour periods prior to conversion. METHODS: This retrospective study included children <18 years old converted from fentanyl to hydromorphone infusions over 6.3 years. Linear mixed models were used to determine if the mean cumulative opioid/sedative dosing differed from the day of conversion versus three 24-hour periods prior to conversion. RESULTS: A total of 36 children were converted to hydromorphone. The median conversion percentage of hydromorphone was 86% of their fentanyl dose (interquartile range [IQR] = 67-100). The median hydromorphone rate at stabilization was 0.08 mg/kg/h (IQR = 0.05-0.1). Eight (22%) were stabilized on their initial hydromorphone rate; 8 (22%) never achieved stabilization. Patients had a significant decrease in opioid dosing on the day of conversion versus the 24-hour period prior to conversion but no changes in sedative dosing following conversion. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: A median 14% fentanyl dose reduction was noted when transitioning to hydromorphone. Further exploration is needed to determine if opioid rotations with hydromorphone can reduce opioid/sedative exposure.

A retrospective review of the use of oxymorphone immediate release for long term pain control in cancer patients with gastrostomy tubes.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients often require feeding or venting gastrostomy-tubes (G-tubes) for enteral nutrition or symptom palliation. The administration of most extended-release (ER) opioids via the G-tube or orally followed by clamping of the venting G-tube is contraindicated. Oxymorphone immediate release (IR) may be useful because of its longer half-life compared to other IR opioids. We examined the use of oxymorphone IR administered every 8 hours in patients with G-tubes. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 40 consecutive cancer patients with G-tubes who underwent opioid rotation (OR) to oxymorphone. Demographics, symptoms, morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), and oxymorphone dose were collected. Successful OR was defined as a 2-point or 30% reduction in pain score and continued use of oxymorphone at follow-up in outpatient setting, or discharge in inpatient setting. Opioid rotation ration (ORR) between MEDD and oxymorphone in patients with successful OR was calculated as MEDD before the OR divided by total oxymorphone dose/day at follow-up or discharge. RESULTS: The median age was 56 years, 57.5% were white, 68% male, 47.5% (n=19) had head and neck cancer, 90% had advanced disease, 67.5% (n=27) were inpatient, and 15% (n=6) had venting G-tubes. 25/40 (62.5%) patients had successful OR to oxymorphone. The median ORR from MEDD to oxymorphone was 3.5 (IQR, 3.1-4). There were no independent predictors for successful OR, and ORR did not significantly differ among various groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oxymorphone IR can be used successfully in cancer patients with G-tubes using an ORR of 3.5 to calculate dose from MEDD.

Opioid rotation from transdermal fentanyl to continuous subcutaneous hydromorphone in a cachectic patient: A case report and review of the literature.

Opioid rotation from transdermal fentanyl to an alternate opioid is often necessitated in advanced disease, but is fraught with uncertainty due to variable absorption from the patch in end-stage illness and the lack of a clearly established opioid rotation ratio. The manufacturer of transdermal fentanyl provides opioid rotation recommendations only for rotation from the oral morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) of opioid to the patch, not in the opposite direction. This is a case report of a single patient with cancer and cachexia admitted to the palliative care unit of a large academic medical centre in Canada. The patient is a 50-year-old female with widely metastatic breast cancer who developed opioid toxicity when maintenance transdermal fentanyl patch therapy (100 µg patch applied every 72 h) was rotated to subcutaneous hydromorphone infusion to improve pain control. Hydromorphone was initiated at a rate of 1 mg/h by continuous infusion based on an opioid rotation ratio for transdermal fentanyl (µg/h):MEDD (mg/day) of 1:2.4. Opioid toxicity eventually resolved with downward titration of hydromorphone to only 30% of the initially estimated equianalgesic dose. This case highlights the need for close follow-up of all patients undergoing opioid rotation from transdermal fentanyl and reinforces the need to reduce the initial dose of the new opioid by 30%-50% of the calculated MEDD, especially when rotating from a high dose of transdermal fentanyl, or if there are factors potentially impairing absorption from the patch such as age, cachexia and weight loss, or if rotation is performed for reasons other than uncontrolled pain.

The role of methadone in cancer-induced bone pain: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP) can be challenging to manage in advanced cancer. The unique properties of methadone may have a role in refractory CIBP. We aimed to evaluate the analgesic effects of methadone for CIBP when other opioids are ineffective or intolerable. METHODS: A retrospective study of palliative care inpatients rotated to methadone from another opioid for CIBP over a 4-year period. Primary outcome was ≥ 30% reduction in pain intensity (11-point numeric rating scale) from baseline to completion of methadone rotation (MR). Secondary outcomes were ≥ 50% reduction in pain intensity and changes in long-acting and breakthrough opioid requirements. RESULTS: Ninety-four eligible patients completed MR for the following reasons: poor pain control (72.3%), opioid toxicities (4.3%) or both (23.4%). On completion of MR, 70.2% and 53.2% achieved a ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% reduction in pain respectively, with mean pain intensity score reduced from 5.6 (SD = 2.1) at baseline to 2.6 (SD = 2.5) (p < 0.001). Mean calculated daily methadone dose pre-MR was 25.7 mg (SD = 10.9), with 72.3% of patients requiring a lower dose on completion of MR (mean 17.0 mg, SD = 8.5). The mean number of breakthrough opioid analgesia used a day reduced from 3.4 (SD = 2.3) to 1.8 (SD = 1.7) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MR for CIBP may result in reduction in pain intensity, when other opioids are ineffective or intolerable, with patients requiring reduced overall dosing of their long-acting opioid and frequency of breakthrough opioid use.

Methadone in Cancer Pain.

Methadone has been an unique, versatile, cost effective, synthetic opioid utilized in nociceptive as well as neuropathic pain. Pain and palliative care physicians started accepting methadone in treatment of complex pain associated with advanced cancer and neuropathic pain syndromes in which conventional opioids were no longer effective. The challenge is in accepting methadone as a main stream first line opioid, from being considered as a second line replacement/substitution drug all these years. Methadone has a significant role as opioid rotation in refractory cancer pain, especially when started early leading to successful conversion. Advantages of methadone in paediatric patients with advanced cancer were its safety and efficacy as a first-choice opioid, availability as a liquid formulation and its infrequent dose requirements. Methadone is neither recommended nor justified to be used as an anti-cancer drug and its role as an anti-cancer agent is a misconception. Many guidelines were proposed after 2008 to address methadone safety. Most of them emphasized on prevention of cardiac arrhythmia and association of methadone with QTc prolongation rather than address the real issue. Methadone has been established to be safe when used in opioid naïve patients with careful titration instituted in an ambulatory setting and has equal success in opioid rotation in outpatient setup. Methadone prescription should be carried out by experienced pain and palliative care providers with careful dose titration and clinical monitoring.

A Practical Approach to Acute Postoperative Pain Management in Chronic Pain Patients.

In the United States, more than 100 million people suffer from chronic pain. Among patients presenting for surgery, about one in four have chronic pain. Acute perioperative pain management in this population is challenging because many patients with chronic pain require long-term opioids for the management of this pain, which may result in tolerance, physical dependence, addiction, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia. These challenges are compounded by the ongoing opioid epidemic that has resulted in calls for a reduction in opioid use, with a concurrent increase in the number of patients with chronic opioid exposure presenting for surgery. This article aims to summarize practical considerations for acute postoperative pain management in patients with chronic pain conditions. A patient-centered acute pain management plan, including nonopioid analgesics, regional anesthesia, and careful selection of opioid medications, can lead to adequate analgesia and satisfaction with care. Also, a meticulous rotation from one opioid to another may decrease opioid requirement, increase analgesic effectiveness, and improve satisfaction with care.

Comparing Methadone Rotation to Consensus Opinion.

CONTEXT: Methadone is a complex but useful medication for pain management in palliative care. Recent expert opinions have been published on the safe and effective use of methadone. OBJECTIVES: To determine the success of methadone rotations and evaluate concordance with consensus recommendations by a palliative care consult service. METHODS: A retrospective study of methadone rotation practice by a palliative care consult service and outcomes for patients hospitalized between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018 at a single academic medical center. A successful rotation was defined as a 30% reduction in pain or as-needed medication use sustained for at least three consecutive days. Patient outcomes were compared with expert consensus recommendations. RESULTS: About 59 patients met the inclusion criteria. The study population was mostly Caucasian men and women of equal proportions who were started on methadone for inadequate pain control. Sixty-eight percent of patients were successfully rotated. Subjects who were rotated using a standardized protocol were six times more likely to have a successful rotation (odds ratio 6.28 [1.25-30.92]; P = 0.0238). CONCLUSION: The utilization of a standardized protocol was associated with better patient outcomes.

Opioid Rotation to Methadone for Refractory Cancer Pain: A Case Series.

Methadone has been increasingly used in the treatment of refractory cancer pain with different conversion methods and ratios described.A retrospective chart review of patients on methadone for cancer pain was conducted to assess its use as the primary opioid, focusing on pain characteristics, opioid rotation indication, previous analgesics, adverse effects and final methadone dose in comparison with the pre-rotation Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD).Eight patients were rotated to methadone due to refractory moderate-severe cancer pain and achieved good pain relief. Three developed adverse effects (2 mild, 1 serious). None required withdrawal of methadone. The final methadone dose required varied significantly from predictions made based on equianalgesic conversion tables.Methadone is effective for the treatment of refractory cancer pain. The eventual required methadone doses for these patients were significantly different from predicted doses suggested by equianalgesic conversion tables and guidelines. This highlights the importance of individualized titration and careful clinical assessment during the rotation and in the days after, to prevent serious adverse effects.

Practical management of opioid rotation and equianalgesia.

PURPOSE: To review the recent literature on opioid rotation (ie, switching from one opioid drug to another or changing an opioid's administration route) in cancer patients experiencing severe pain and to develop a novel equianalgesia table for use in routine clinical practice. METHODS: The MEDLINE database was searched with terms "cancer pain," "opioid rotation," "opioid switching," "opioid ratio," "opioid conversion ratio," and "opioid equianalgesia" for the major opioids (morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, and hydromorphone) and the intravenous, subcutaneous, oral, and transdermal administration routes. Selected articles were assessed for the calculated or cited opioid dose ratio, bidirectionality, and use of the oral morphine equivalent daily dose or a direct drug-to-drug ratio. RESULTS: Twenty publications met our selection criteria and were analyzed in detail. We did not find any large-scale, prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial with robust design, and most of the studies assessed relatively small numbers of patients. Bidirectionality was investigated in seven studies only. CONCLUSION: The updated equianalgesic table presented here incorporates the latest data and provides information on bidirectionality. Despite the daily use of equianalgesic tables, they are not based on high-level scientific evidence. More clinical research is needed on this topic.

Practical Guide for Using Methadone in Pain and Palliative Care Practice.

Since the 2014 Amendment to the NDPS Act methadone has been released in India for pain management. The methadone is supplied as racemic mixture with R & S methadone with benefit in pain management and associated adverse effects. Physicians need to be aware of adverse effects so that methadone can be administered safely. Similarly, patients and families need to store and use methadone carefully and experience the benefits and not increase the risk of further morbidity. Considerable amount of literature on methadone is available and sometimes conflicting, hence the article is attempting to guide a physician to use methadone safely to acquire experience and expertise over time.

The applications of intravenous opioids and multimodal analgesia in cancer pain man-agement / 中国肿瘤临床

The management of refractory cancer pain remains a challenge for oncologists and pain physicians worldwide.Although a large number of patients with cancer pain benefit from oral analgesics in the early stages,single oral opioids tend to be less effective in patients with the advanced disease and refractory cancer pain;for this,intravenous opioid administration is the most commonly used rapid analgesic option.Currently,the increasing clinical use of opioid-patient controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA)has generat-ed extensive discussion on its indications,drug selection,titration,and other related topics.In addition,with the rapid development of multimodal analgesia,the individualized measures for cancer pain management show a broader exploratory scope.We will review the above topics in this article with the hope of providing some references for treatment optimization in refractory cancer pain manage-ment.