Mammography Coverage and Tumor Stage in the Opportunistic Screening Context.

INTRODUCTION: The increment of breast cancer screening coverage should lead to an increase in the proportion of early tumors diagnosed and the decrease of the cancer-related mortality. However, the effectiveness of opportunistic mammography screening is not well documented for public health systems in middle-income countries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an ecologic study to evaluate the association of mammography coverage with trends in breast cancer stage distribution. We used data from a total of 42,850 breast cancer patients, diagnosed between 2000 and 2016, combined with estimated mammography coverage from 3 surveys (2003, 2008, and 2013). RESULTS: Biannual mammography coverage increased from 62.4% in 2003 to 73.9% in 2013. From 2000 to 2016, the proportion of in situ tumors increased 6.9%, the proportion of localized tumors increased 3.9%, the proportion of regional tumors decreased 6.9% and the frequency of distant tumors decreased 4% (P < .00001). CONCLUSION: Mammography coverage in the context of opportunistic breast cancer screening was associated with the increase of in situ and localized tumors and decrease of regional and distant tumors.

Incidental identification of vertebral compression fractures in patients over 60 years old using computed tomography scans showing the entire thoraco-lumbar spine.

INTRODUCTION: Vertebral compression fractures (VCF) are frequently asymptomatic; incidental diagnosis is a valuable opportunity to identify low bone mass and to start treatment. We aimed to determine the proportion of patients over 60 years old evaluated with chest plus abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans, allowing visualization of the entire thoraco-lumbar spine, who incidentally present VCF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 300 patients over 60 years old who under went chest plus abdominal and pelvic CT scans. Using sagittal reformats we looked for VCF using the method described by Genant. Accordingly, VCF were classified into mild, moderate or severe. We also determined the percentage of VCF described in the radiological reports. RESULTS: In our cohort [median age 72.5 years (61-94)], 45.67% were males and 54.33% were females. In total, 43 patients (14.33%) had at least one VCF; 32 (10.67%) had one VCF, whereas 11 (3.67%) exhibited multiple VCF, with a total of 84 fractures. 42 were mild fractures, 29 moderate and 13 severe. The proportion of males (13.87%) and females (14.72%) with VCF was not different (p = 0.83). Patients with VCF were older than those without VCF (p < 0.01). Only age but not sex was independently associated with the presence of VCF. Only 32.56% of patients we identified as having a VCF had a description in their report (14 patients). CONCLUSION: An important proportion of patients over 60 years old evaluated with chest plus abdominal and pelvic CT scans present VCF. The reporting of these VCF is insufficient; radiologists and clinicians should include their detection in their search pattern.

¿Por qué no diagnosticamos el cáncer gástrico incipiente? ¿Cómo podemos mejorar? / Why do we fail in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer? How can we improve?

Detection and treatment of gastric cancer (GC) in early stages is the most effective approach for improving prognosis. Patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), defined as a type of cancer affecting only mucosa and submucosa, has a good prognosis in the long-term, and if some criteria are met, endoscopic therapy is curative. Unfortunately EGC diagnosis is rare, except in case of some Asian countries, where more than 50% of tumors are diagnosed in this stage. In Japan, the main technique for early diagnosis is opportunistic screening, i.e. endoscopy performed for different reasons. Some of the factors that affect endoscopic diagnose include: characteristics of the lesion (some cases slight changes in color or in the surface, a location that is difficult to detect, except in retro view); elements associated with the endoscopic technique (lesions hidden underneath gastric contents, non-systematic visualization, not enough time for exploration); and early access to the procedure (long waiting lists, lack of clinic or epidemiology screening criteria, lack of risk-stratification looking for pre-malignant lesions to establish endoscopic follow-up). Know and act upon the mentioned factors is a path that has proven to improve EGC diagnosis and therefore, improve prognosis.

Detectar y tratar el cáncer gástrico (CG) en una etapa inicial constituye la estrategia más efectiva para mejorar el pronóstico de esta patología. Pacientes con CG incipiente (CGI), definido como el que compromete sólo la mucosa y la submucosa, tienen un muy buen pronóstico a largo plazo y si se cumplen algunos criterios, el tratamiento endoscópico es curativo. Desgraciadamente el diagnóstico de CGI es infrecuente en todo el mundo, a excepción de algunos países asiáticos donde más de la mitad de los tumores se diagnostican en esta etapa. En Japón la principal vía por la que se realiza este diagnóstico precoz es mediante el tamizaje oportunista, es decir, la endoscopia que se realiza de manera cotidiana por diferentes motivos. Dentro de los factores que afectan la capacidad diagnóstica de la endoscopia destacan: las características de la lesión (algunos casos con discretos cambios de color o superficie, ubicación habitualmente en áreas de mejor visualización en retrovisión); factores asociados a la técnica endoscópica (contenido gástrico que puede ocultar lesiones, visualización no sistemática, tiempo insuficiente de exploración); y el acceso oportuno a ella (largas listas de espera, falta de criterios de selección clínicos o epidemiológicos, falta de estratificación del riesgo mediante la búsqueda de lesiones premalignas para definir intervalos de seguimiento endoscópico). Conocer y actuar sobre los factores descritos es un camino que ha demostrado su utilidad en mejorar el diagnóstico del CGI y así mejorar su pronóstico.

Increased breast cancer screening and downstaging in Colombian women: A randomized trial of opportunistic breast-screening.

The lack of breast cancer screening in low and middle-income countries results in later stage diagnosis and worsened outcomes for women. A cluster randomized trial was performed in Bogotá, Colombia between 2008 and 2012 to evaluate effects of opportunistic breast cancer screening. Thirteen clinics were randomized to an intervention arm and 13 to a control arm. Physicians in intervention clinics were instructed to perform clinical breast examination on all women aged 50-69 years attending clinics for non-breast health issues, and then refer them for mammographic screening. Physicians in control clinics were not explicitly instructed to perform breast screening or mammography referrals, but could do so if they thought it indicated ("usual care"). Women were followed for 2-years postrandomization. 7,436 women were enrolled and 7,419 (99.8%) screened in intervention clinics, versus 8,419 enrolled and 1,108 (13.1%) screened in control clinics. Incidence ratios (IR) of early, advanced and all breast cancers were 2.9 (95% CI 1.1-9.2), 1.0 (0.3-3.5) and 1.9 (0.9-4.1) in the first (screening) year of the trial, and the cumulative IR for all breast cancers converged to 1.4 (0.7-2.8) by the end of follow-up (Year 2). Eighteen (69.2%) of 26 women with early stage disease had breast conservation surgery (BCS) versus 6 (42.5%) of 14 women with late-stage disease (p = 0.02). Fifteen (68.2%) of 22 women with breast cancer in the intervention group had BCS versus nine (50.0%) of 18 women in the control group (p = 0.34). Well-designed opportunistic clinic-based breast cancer screening programs may be useful for early breast cancer detection in LMICs.

COPD screening in primary care in four Latin American countries: methodology of the PUMA Study.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of COPD among patients treated in the healthcare system in Latin America is unknown. The PUMA study (Prevalencia y práctica habitUal -diagnóstico y tratamiento- en población de riesgo de EPOC en Médicos generalistas de 4 países de América Latina) screened at-risk patients attending primary care centers to evaluate the prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of COPD in this setting. The aim of this report is to describe the study methodology. METHODS: Multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study conducted in Argentina, Colombia, Uruguay and Venezuela. Subjects were≥40 years, smokers, former smokers and/or exposed to fossil fuels attending primary care centers. Eligible patients underwent pre- and post- bronchodilator spirometry and completed standardized questionnaires on demographics, smoking, exposure to environmental/domestic pollution, symptoms/history and management of respiratory diseases, comorbidities, and use of healthcare resources. RESULTS: A total of 57 centers in 4 countries participated; 1,907 patients were included, 1,743 completed the PUMA questionnaire and 1,540 patients underwent validated spirometry. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the methodology used in the PUMA study, the first systematic multicenter study in four Latin American countries aimed at detecting COPD cases confirmed by spirometry in primary care. Approximately 90% of patients who completed the PUMA questionnaire underwent valid spirometry tests. This gives room for reflection on the feasibility of opportunistic screening at the primary care level to detect patients in the early stages of COPD or with undiagnosed COPD, and improve the diagnosis and management of this disease.