[Evaluation of the accuracy of modern intraocular lens calculation formulas when optical biometry is not possible]. / Otsenka tochnosti sovremennykh formul rascheta intraokulyarnykh linz pri nevozmozhnosti vypolneniya opticheskoi biometrii.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the accuracy of modern intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas using axial length (AL) data obtained by ultrasound biometry (UBM) compared to the third-generation SRK/T calculator. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 230 patients (267 eyes) with severe lens opacities that prevented optical biometry, who underwent phacoemulsification (PE) with IOL implantation. IOL power calculation according to the SRK/T formula was based on AL and anterior chamber depth obtained by UBM (Tomey Biometer Al-100) and keratometry on the Topcon KR 8800 autorefractometer. To adapt AL for new generation calculators - Barrett Universal II (BUII), Hill RBF ver. 3.0 (RBF), Kane and Ladas Super Formula (LSF) - the retinal thickness (0.20 mm) was added to the axial length determined by UBM, and then the optical power of the artificial lens was calculated. The mean error and its modulus value were used as criteria for the accuracy of IOL calculation. RESULTS: A significant difference (p=0.008) in the mean IOL calculation error was found between the formulas. Pairwise analysis revealed differences between SRK/T (-0.32±0.58 D) and other formulas - BUII (-0.16±0.52 D; p=0.014), RBF (-0.17±0.51 D; p=0.024), Kane (-0.17±0.52 D; p=0.029), but not with the LSF calculator (-0.19±0.53 D; p=0.071). No significant differences between the formulas were found in terms of mean error modulus (p=0.238). New generation calculators showed a more frequent success in hitting target refraction (within ±1.00 D in more than 95% of cases) than the SRK/T formula (86%). CONCLUSION: The proposed method of adding 0.20 mm to the AL determined by UBM allows using this parameter in modern IOL calculation formulas and improving the refractive results of PE, especially in eyes with non-standard anterior segment structure.

Current Concepts and Recent Updates of Optical Biometry- A Comprehensive Review.

One of the most recent advancements in the field of cataract surgery is optical biometry. With the advent of optical biometry ocular measurements are now simpler, quicker, and more precise. The devices have made intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations easier in difficult situations too, such as in cases with extremes of axial lengths, silicone filled eyes, cataract surgery in post-keratoplasty eyes, post Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) eyes, etc. The gold standard for IOL power calculation in the present day is by the use of optical biometry devices. The anatomical measurements by these devices are highly precise and because of these measurements and the incorporation of various IOL power calculation formulas the optical biometry devices give the accurate power and the post-operative visual outcome is highly satisfactory among the patients. The growing use of these devices has made cataract the most commonly performed refractive surgical procedure nowadays. In the current scenario, optical biometry has widespread acceptance in almost all countries and has many advantages over ultrasound or immersion biometry. Cataract surgeons can obtain easy and reliable measurements from these devices. Refractive surprises have also decreased considerably with their use. This article will comprehensively review the principles of the various optical biometry devices, the parameters used in each of the devices, the advantages and disadvantages, and add more like what all this article will add.

Repeatability of Epithelium Thickness Measured by an AS-OCT in Different Grades of Keratoconus and Compared to AS-OCT/Placido Topography.

PURPOSE: To compare agreement of corneal epithelium thickness (ET) between AS-OCT system (RTVue, Optovue) and AS-OCT/Placido topographer (MS-39, CSO) in eyes with different stages of keratoconus (KC), and to assess the repeatability of RTVue AS-OCT. DESIGN: Prospective reliability analysis. METHODS: KC eyes were classified into forme fruste KC (FFKC), mild, moderate, and severe KC. Agreement was evaluated with Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). The repeatability of RTVue was assessed via within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test-retest variability (TRT), coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: A total of 119 KC eyes were enrolled, with 21 being FFKC, 26 mild, 39 moderate, and 34 severe. The 95% LoA ranged between -5.9 and 4.8 µm for center epithelium thickness (CET), between -5.7 and 8.2 µm for thinnest epithelium thickness (TET). At 1-mm measuring points, the 95% LoA of superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal were -4.2 to 4.7 µm, -5.2 to 6.0 µm, -7.9 to 10.2 µm, and -11.2 to 6.0 µm. At 3-mm measuring points, the corresponding values were -2.8 to 9.3 µm, -2.0 to 13.0 µm, -4.6 to 9.6 µm, and -6.3 to 9.7 µm, indicating that the 2 instruments were not interchangeable without adjustment. Despite that the repeatability of RTVue measurements in KC patients were acceptable, repeatability decreased gradually with the peripheralization of the measurement points. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 OCT-based devices, RTVue and MS-39, do not provide interchangeable measurements of epithelium thickness in KC patients. Repeatability decreases in cases of more severe KC, emphasizing the importance of grading before clinical examination to avoid diagnostic errors.

Estimation of angle parameters by ASOCT and biometric parameters by optical biometer in eyes with occludable angles and open angles.

PURPOSE: To compare anterior chamber angle (ACA) parameters measured by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (ASOCT) and biometric parameters measured by Swept-Source (SS) OCT-based biometry among patients with suspected occludable angles and open angles. METHODS: An analytical, cross-sectional study was performed on subjects attending our ophthalmology outpatient department with suspected occludable angles (van Herick grades 0, 1, and 2) in group 1, and with open angles (van Herick grades 3 and 4) in group 2. Each subject underwent a complete ophthalmic examination to exclude any intraocular pathology like cataract. We recruited 128 eyes of 64 subjects, 34 in group 1 and 30 in group 2. Each eye was henceforth subjected to ASOCT (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg) and SS-OCT-based optical biometry (IOL Master 700, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG). Anatomical parameters were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The main outcome measures of the study included nine ASOCT parameters (central corneal thickness [CCT], lens vault, AOD750, ACA, TISA750 [nasal and temporal], and ACW) and five optical biometric parameters (CCT, ACD, WTW, LT, and axial length). We found a significant difference (p < 0.05) among all the anatomical parameters between the two groups, except CCT which was not significantly different (p = 0.297). CONCLUSIONS: ASOCT and SSOCT biometry overcome the challenges of gonioscopy and allow screening for angle closure disease in otherwise normal subjects. ASOCT may serve as an alternative to gonioscopy as it clearly separates occludable angles from open angles in a non-invasive and objective manner.

Clinical Evaluation of a New Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer.

The VEMoS-AXL system is a new optical biometer based on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) that has been tested in terms of intrasession repeatability and compared with a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer (SS-OCT), which is recognized as the gold standard for the performance of an agreement analysis. A biometric analysis was performed three consecutive times in 120 healthy eyes of 120 patients aged between 18 and 40 years with the SD-OCT system, and afterwards, a single measurement was obtained with the SS-OCT system. Within-subject standard deviations were 0.004 mm, 4.394 µm, and 0.017 mm for axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measures obtained with the SD-OCT biometer, respectively. The agreement between devices was good for AL (limits of agreement, LoA: -0.04 to 0.03 mm) and CCT (LoA: -4.36 to 14.38 µm), whereas differences between devices were clinically relevant for ACD (LoA: 0.03 to 0.21 mm). In conclusion, the VEMoS-AXL system provides consistent measures of anatomical parameters, being most of them interchangeable with those provided by the SS-OCT-based gold standard.

Central anterior chamber depth correlated with white-to-white distance in normal, long, and short eyes.

PURPOSE: To explore the associations between central anterior chamber depth (CACD) and other anterior segment biometric parameters and to determine the possible determinants of CACD in short, normal, and long eyes. METHODS: The biometric data of pre-operation patients aged 50-80 years with coexisting cataract and primary angle-closure disease or senile cataract were reviewed. Axial length (AL), CACD, lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT), and white-to-white distance (WTW) were measured by Lenstar optical biometry (Lenstar 900). The data of 100 normal eyes (AL = 22 to 26 mm), 100 short eyes (AL ≤ 22 mm), and 100 long eyes (AL ≥ 26 mm) were consecutively collected for subsequent analyses. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 66.60 ± 7.85 years, with 25.7% of the sample being men. Both CACD and WTW were found to be smallest in short eyes and were smaller in normal eyes than in long eyes (F = 126.524, P < 0.001; F = 28.458, P < 0.001). The mean LT was significantly thicker in short eyes than in normal and long eyes (4.66 mm versus 4.49 mm versus 4.40 mm; F = 18.099, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in CCT between the three AL groups (F = 2.135, P = 0.120). Stepwise regression analysis highlighted AL, LT, and WTW as three independent factors associated with CACD in the normal AL group. In the short AL group and long AL group, LT and WTW were independent factors associated with CACD. CONCLUSIONS: CACD increases as AL elongates and reaches a peak when AL exceeds 26 mm. Furthermore, CACD showed inverse correlation with LT and positive correlation with WTW. A relatively small WTW results in an anteriorly positioned lens, and thus, a decrease in CACD.

Evaluation of the structural changes of uveitis patients by optical biometry.

Objective (Aim): To observe the ocular structural changes in active and inactive uveitis patients. Methods: This retrospective study involved 30 patients (32 eyes) with anterior and intermediate uveitis cases and 54 eyes of 54 cases in a control group, who were admitted to the Ophthalmology Department at Trakya University. In the study group, 14 patients were females, 16 patients were males and in the control group 26 volunteers were females, and 28 volunteers were male of the 54 volunteers. Anterior chamber depth, axial length, intraocular pressure, lens thickness, central corneal thickness, steep and flat values in keratometry, corrected visual acuity in both eyes, anterior chamber cells, and vitreous cells were measured and compared between three groups (two uveitis groups - active and inactive - and control group). Results: In the comparison of the median values of axial length, central corneal thickness, and steep and flat values of keratometry, the values of the patients with active uveitis were higher than the ones in the control group in each parameter, but no significant difference was observed. The anterior chamber depth parameter value was higher, the lens thickness value was lower in patients with active uveitis than the values in the control group and the differences were statistically significant (p<0,05). No significant structural differences in the values of the active and inactive group patients (p>0,05) were observed. Conclusions: Only lens thickness and anterior chamber depth parameters were statistically significant in patients with active uveitis, compared with the inactive uveitis group. Anterior chamber depth measurement values were higher and lens thickness measurement values were lower in patients with active uveitis when compared with the control group. Abbreviations: AAU = Acute anterior uveitis, CAU = Chronic Anterior Uveitis, AC = Anterior Chamber, IOP = Intraocular Pressure, IVCM = in vivo Confocal Microscopy, AS-OCT = Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography, UBM = Ultrasound Biomicroscopy, LFP = Laser Flare Photometry, KP = Keratic Precipitates, OCT = Optical Coherence Tomography, AL = Axial Length, ACD = Anterior Chamber Depth, LT = Lens Thickness, CCT = Central Corneal Thickness, Ks = Steep Value of Keratometry, Kf = Flat Value of Keratometry, AUP = Active Uveitis Patients, IUP = Inactive Uveitis Patients, SUN = Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature.

Axial length acquisition success rates and agreement of four optical biometers and one ultrasound biometer in eyes with dense cataracts.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the axial length acquisition success rates and agreement between various biometric parameters obtained with different biometers in dense cataracts. METHODS: Fifty-one eyes were measured using Anterion®, Argos® and IOLMaster® 700 swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, a Pentacam® AXL partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer, and an OcuScan® RxP ultrasound biometer. We measured keratometry (K1, flattest keratometry and K2, steepest keratometry), white-to-white (WTW), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT) and axial length. Cataracts were classified according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III grading system, the dysfunctional lens index (DLI) and Pentacam® nucleus staging (PNS) metrics. Percentage of acquisition success rate and a Bland-Altman analysis for the agreement between biometers were calculated. RESULTS: The mean LOCS III score was 3.63 ± 0.92, the mean DLI was 2.95 ± 1.30 and the mean PNS was 2.36 ± 1.20. The acquisition success rates for the Anterion®, Argos®, IOLMaster® 700, Pentacam® AXL and OcuScan® RxP biometers were 94.12%, 100%, 98.04%, 60.78% and 100%, respectively. There were significant differences in the success rates between biometers (P = 0.014). There were statistically significant differences between biometers for all parameters evaluated (P < 0.05). The range of the limit of agreement (LoA) for all comparisons of K1 and K2 were > 1.00 D. The LoA for WTW ranged from 0.095 to 1.050 mm. The LoA for ACD and LT ranged from 0.307 to 0.114 mm and from 0.378 to 0.108 mm, respectively. The LoA for axial length ranged from 0.129 to 2.378 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Among optical biometers, those based on SS-OCT technology are more successful at measuring axial length in eyes with dense cataracts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the National Institutes of Health (clinical trial identifier NCT05239715, http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ).

The Impact of Severe COVID-19 on Corneal Endothelial Cells-Analysis of the In Vivo Noncontact Specular Microscopy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of severe COVID-19 infection on the corneal endothelium via in vivo specular microscopy. METHODS: This was an observational, prospective, and controlled study including 56 eyes of 56 severe COVID-19 patients, compared to after-recovery and 56 eyes of 56 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. RESULTS: Endothelial cell density was lower in the active disease period compared to healthy controls (p = .001) and decreased even more after recovery (p < .0001). After recovery, the average cell area and coefficient of variation were higher compared to the active disease period (p < .0001 and p = .008, respectively) and the healthy controls (for both, p < .0001), whereas hexagonality was lower (p < .0001). Central corneal thickness increased in the active disease period compared to after recovery (p < .0001) and healthy controls (p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: These results may be due to direct host-virus interaction or linked to immune dysregulation, subclinical corneal endotheliitis, or still yet a viral-mediated inflammation.

Repeatability of a fully automated swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and agreement with a low coherence reflectometry biometer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the repeatability of a fully automated swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and its agreement with an optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) for several biometric parameters. METHODS: In this study, 74 eyes of 74 patients were measured using the Eyestar 900 SS-OCT and Lenstar LS 900 OLCR. Flat keratometry (K1) and steep keratometry (K2), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) were measured three times with each device. The repeatability was analyzed with the intrasubject standard deviation, coefficient of variability (CoV), and coefficient of repeatability (CoR) for each instrument. The agreement between the instruments was evaluated with Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: K1, K2 and CCT CoV values were < 0.2%, < 0.4% and < 0.55%, respectively. Higher CoV values were found for ACD and LT ranging from 0.56% to 1.74%. The lowest CoV values were found for the AL measurements (0.03% and 0.06% for the Eyestar 900 and the Lenstar LS 900, respectively). AL measurements provided the highest repeatability, measured with both CoV and CoR values, and the CCT was the parameter with the lowest repeatability. The CCT and LT measurements were statistically significant between the two biometers (P < 0.001). The interval of the limits of agreement was < 0.6 D for K1 and K2, 15.78 µm for CCT, 0.21 mm for ACD, 0.34 mm for LT, and 0.08 mm for AL. CONCLUSIONS: Both biometers provide repeatable measurements for the different parameters analyzed and can be used interchangeably.

Agreement of Corneal Diameter and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements with the IOLMaster 500 and the IOLMaster 700 Optical Biometers in Myopic Eyes.

Purpose: To assess the agreement in automated corneal diameter (CD) and anterior chamber depth (ACD, measured from corneal epithelium to lens) distances measurements between the IOLMaster 500 and 700 optical biometers in myopic eyes. Methods: One hundred and sixteen eyes of 116 myopic patients aged between 21 to 60 years were included in this study. Measurements of CD and ACD distances were taken with each biometer for all patients in the same session. A t-test and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant when the measurements were compared. The agreement between biometers was studied by applying a Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The mean CD values obtained using the IOLMaster 500 and 700 biometers were 12.26±0.35 mm and 12.13±0.34 mm, respectively. The mean ACD distance values were 3.61±0.29 mm and 3.62±0.31, for the IOLMaster 500 and 700 biometers, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the two devices only for CD measurements (p<0.001), but not for ACD measurements (p=0.26). The limits of agreement obtained were wide in both types of measurements, being 0.422 mm for the CD distance and 0.389 mm for the ACD distance. Conclusion: There were statistically significant differences between the IOLMaster 500 and 700 biometers regarding CD but not in ACD measurements in healthy myopic eyes. These differences could be clinically significant in some cases. According to these results, medical judgement should be used to assess whether the two devices could be used interchangeably for CD and ACD measurements during the clinical practice.

Evaluation of Higher Order Aberrations and Anterior Segment Parameters Changes After Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation for High Myopia.

Purpose: To evaluate changes in higher order aberrations (HOAs) induced by implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation in correction of high myopia and to compare the anterior segment parameters before and after surgery. Also, to correlate these parameters with HOAs, the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP). Methods: This prospective interventional cohort case series study included 40 eyes with high myopia that underwent ICL V4c implantation. They were evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively at 1st and 3rd month HOAs using Scheimpflug Sirius Camera. The anterior segment parameters were evaluated by optical biometry. Correlations between HOAs, BCVA and anterior segment parameters were evaluated. Results: The mean pre-operative BCVA was 0.67 ± 0.17, while post-operative BCVA was 0.74 ± 0.16 (p-value < 0.001). The spherical equivalent was -13.66 ± 2.23 pre-operatively, while post-operatively it was -0.77 ± 0.65 (p-value < 0.001). The mean pre-operative root mean square (RMS) of HOAs was 0.62 ± 0.11 µm, while mean post-operative RMS in the 1st month was 0.82 ± 0.29 µm (p-value < 0.001). At 3rd month, it was 0.63 ± 0.17 µm (p-value = 0.685). The mean pre-operative anterior chamber depth (ACD) was 3.66 ± 0.26 mm. It decreased in the post-operative 1st month to 3.46 ± 0.30 mm, while in 3rd month 3.45 ± 0.24 mm (p-value < 0.001, < 0.001) respectively. The mean pre-operative anterior chamber angle (ACA) 45.98 ± 8.39 o while, the mean ACA was 31.65 ± 4.14, 31.03 ± 3.74 post-operatively (p-value < 0.001, < 0.001) respectively. There was significant increase in IOP (p-value < 0.001). Conclusion: ICL implantation is safe and effective in correction of high myopia, as HOAs increase at first month post-operatively then, return to the pre-operative level by 3rd month. However, anterior segment parameters show significant changes which may need longer follow up.

Technical failure rates for biometry between swept-source and older-generation optical coherence methods: a review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Precise ocular measurements are fundamental for achieving excellent target refraction following both cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange. Biometry devices with swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) employ longer wavelengths (1055-1300 nm) in order to have better penetration through opaque lenses than those with partial coherence interferometry (PCI) or low-coherence optical reflectometry (LCOR) methods. However, to date a pooled analysis showing the technical failure rate (TFR) between the methods has not been published. The aim of this study was to compare the TFR in SS-OCT and in PCI/LCOR biometry. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were used to search the medical literature as of Feb 1, 2022. The following keywords were used in various combinations: optical biometry, partial coherence interferometry, low-coherence optical reflectometry, swept-source optical coherence tomography. Only clinical studies referring to patients undergoing routine cataract surgery, and employing at least two (PCI or LCOR vs. SS-OCT) optical methods for optical biometry in the same cohort of patients were included. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in the final analysis, which presented results of 2,459 eyes of at least 1,853 patients. The overall TFR of all included studies was 5.47% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.66-8.08%; overall I2 = 91.49%). The TFR was significantly different among the three methods (p < 0.001): 15.72% for PCI (95% CI: 10.73-22.46%; I2 = 99.62%), 6.88% for LCOR (95% CI: 3.26-13.92%; I2 = 86.44%), and 1.51% for SS-OCT (95% CI: 0.94-2.41%; I2 = 24.64%). The pooled TFR for infrared methods (PCI and LCOR) was 11.12% (95% CI: 8.45-14.52%; I2 = 78.28%), and was also significantly different to that of SS-OCT: 1.51% (95% CI: 0.94-2.41%; I2 = 24.64%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A meta-analysis of the TFR of different biometry methods highlighted that SS-OCT biometry resulted in significantly decreased TFR compared to PCI/LCOR devices.

Agreement between a new optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and an anterior segment optical coherence tomographer.

BACKGROUND: To assess agreement of measurements between a new optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer (SW-9000, Suoer, Tianjin, China) and a spectral-domain optical coherence tomographer (SD-OCT)/Placido topographer (MS-39, CSO, Florence, Italy) in healthy subjects. METHODS: A total of 66 right eyes from 66 healthy subjects were enrolled in this prospective study. Three consecutive measurements were randomly obtained with both devices by the same experienced operator to assess agreement. Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used to verify the agreement between the devices. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). RESULTS: The SD-OCT/Placido tomographer showed high agreement with the OLCR biometer for all parameters included in this study. The mean differences of central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), aqueous depth (AQD), mean keratometry (Km) and corneal diameter (CD) were 2.21 ± 2.67 µm (P < 0.001), - 0.10 ± 0.03 mm (P < 0.001), - 0.10 ± 0.04 mm (P < 0.001), - 0.01 ± 0.22 D (P = 0.773) and 0.20 ± 0.16 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. This implies that the inter-device difference in Km was not statistically significant, while the differences in CCT, ACD, AQD, CD were statistically but not clinically significant. The 95% LoAs of CCT, ACD, AQD, Km and CD were - 3.01 to 7.44 µm, - 0.16 to - 0.05 mm, - 0.18 to - 0.03 mm, - 0.45 to 0.43 D, and - 0.12 to 0.51 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For CCT, ACD, AQD, Km, and CD in healthy subjects, the new OLCR biometer has high agreement with the SD-OCT/Placido tomographer and can be used interchangeably due to the narrow range of 95% LoAs.

Efficacy of keratometric values obtained from Sirius topographer® in nidek axial length-scan® for intraocular lens calculation after penetrating keratoplasty.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the accuracy of keratometric values obtained from Scheimpflug (Sirius) topography using Nidek AL-Scan optical biometry (OB) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculating after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). METHODS: Thirty eyes of 26 patients were included in this study. The demographic information, complete ophthalmic examination, IOL calculation technique, and its effect on final refractive results were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 52.76 ± 16.20 years. The mean K readings using Nidek AL-Scan OB, mean simulated K (SimK) (3mm), and mean pupillary power (MPP) (4.5mm) K readings using Sirius were 41.92 ± 5.05 D, 42.99 ± 5.78 D, and 43.30±6.23 D (p= 0.515). CONCLUSIONS: Both devices correctly calculated IOL power after PK; however, Sirius SimK (3mm) gave the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) results and can be safely used for IOL power calculation.

Agreement between a Spectral-Domain Ocular Coherence Tomography Biometer with a Swept-Source Ocular Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry Biometer in Eyes with Cataract.

Purpose: To assess the agreement between biometric parameters measured by a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography optical biometer device (Optopol Revo NX) with a validated swept-source biometer (IOLMaster 700) and a validated optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer (Lenstar LS 900), in cataract surgery candidates. Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 100 patients (100 eyes) who were eligible for cataract surgery were involved. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between devices for biometric parameters including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT). Results: AL measurements were successful in 82 eyes (82.0%) with Revo NX, in 91 eyes (91.0%) with Lenstar LS 900, and in 97 eyes (97.0%) with IOLMaster 700. When Revo NX was compared to IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900, the mean differences were as follows: -0.02 ± 0.02 mm and -0.02 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.313, P = 0.525) for AL, 0.01 ± 0.03 mm and 0.10 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.691, P = 0.002) for ACD, -0.15 ± 0.03 mm and 0.001 ± 0.04 mm (P < 0.001, P = 0.95) for LT, and -2.29 ± 0.92 µm, and 0.73 ± 1.43 µm (P = 0.015, P = 0.612) for CCT. Three devices were highly correlated for AL, ACD, LT, and CCT (interclass correlation coefficient > 0.75). Bland-Altman plots showed a narrower 95% limit of agreement (-0.35 to 0.31) between Revo NX and IOLMaster 700 in measuring AL. Conclusions: Despite the higher measurement failure rate in eyes with cataract, the Revo NX showed very good agreement with the IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar LS 900 optical biometers in measuring AL, ACD, LT, and CCT. However, ACD and LT measurements cannot be considered interchangeable between these devices.

Repetibilidad y comparabilidad de un nuevo tomógrafo con tecnología SS-OCT en biometría óptica / Repeatability and comparability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer in optical biometry

Objetivo Evaluar la reproducibilidad en la medición de los parámetros biométricos utilizando un nuevo biómetro por tomografía de coherencia óptica con fuente de barrido y compararlo con un biómetro por reflectometría óptica de baja coherencia. Diseño Estudio observacional, descriptivo, de corte transversal. Método Se incluyeron 45 ojos derechos de 45 pacientes, a los que se realizó tres mediciones consecutivas con el biómetro Anterion y una con el biómetro Lenstar LS900. Se recogieron las siguientes variables: longitud axial (AXL), profundidad de cámara anterior (ACD), K plana (K1), K curva (K2), grosor corneal central (CCT), grosor del cristalino (LT) y distancia blanco-blanco (WTW). Para evaluar la repetibilidad se calculó el coeficiente de Pearson «R» y la desviación estándar intrasujeto (Sw). Para evaluar la comparabilidad entre los biómetros se utilizó el coeficiente de correlación de concordancia (CCC) y el coeficiente de correlación intraclase (CCI). Además, se realizaron gráficos de Bland-Altman para cada variable. Resultados El coeficiente de Pearson fue excelente y estadísticamente significativo en la evaluación de la repetibilidad para todas las variables. Los valores más altos fueron 0,987 (AXL), 0,983 (CCT) y 0,942 (ACD). No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las repetidas mediciones con Anterion para todas las variables. Los valores de CCC y CCI fueron excelentes en la evaluación de las variables AXL, CCT y ACD, y fueron altos para las variables K1, K2, LT y WTW. Conclusiones La realización de una biometría óptica ocular con el biómetro SS-OCT Anterion es un procedimiento reproducible y comparable con el biómetro Lenstar LS900 (AU)

Purpose To evaluate the reproducibility in the measurement of ocular biometric parameters using a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and its comparability with an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer. Design An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. Methods 45 right eyes of 45 patients diagnosed with cataract were included. Three successive biometric measurements with Anterion and one with Lenstar LS900 were performed on each patient. The following variables were collected: axial length (AXL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), flat K (K1), steep K (K2), central corneal thickness (CCT), lens thickness (LT) and white-to-white distance (WTW). The intrasubject standard deviation (Sw) and the coefficient of Pearson «R» were calculated in order to assess the repeatability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were obtained to evaluate the comparability between devices. A Bland–Altman plot was performed for each variable. Results The coefficient of Pearson was excellent and statistically significant in the evaluation of the repeatability in all the variables. The highest values were 0.987 (AXL), 0.983 (CCT) and 0.942 (ACD). There were no statically significant differences between repeated measurements with Anterion in all the parameters. The ICC and CCC were excellent in the evaluation of AXL, CCT and ACD, and were also good in regard to K1, K2, LT and WTW. Conclusions Performing biometry with the SS-OCT Anterion is a reliable and reproducible procedure, and it is comparable with the Lenstar LS900 (AU)

Axial length measurement failure rates using optical biometry based on swept-source OCT in cataractous eyes.

INTRODUCTION: Ocular dimensions measurement is extremely important in cataract procedures and refractive surgery. The use of optical techniques for axial measurements has been developed in recent years. AREAS COVERED: The purpose was to summarize the outcomes reported when swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) optical biometry failed during axial length measurement. A peer-reviewed literature search was carried out to identify publications reporting clinical outcomes for cataractous eyes measured with SS-OCT optical biometers available on the market. A comprehensive analysis of the available data was performed, focusing on parameters such as the sample of eyes evaluated, failure rates, and specifically, the cataract type when the measurement was not possible. 27 studies were included in this review. In general, SS-OCT biometers lead to only small failure rates when measuring axial length (but in some cases up to 38.49%). In the few cases where the measurement was not possible, the cataract type of the eyes was mainly mature white or grade ≥ IV. SS-OCT optical biometers show good outcomes when measuring axial length in eyes with advanced cataracts. EXPERT OPINION: We believe that the use of SS-OCT technology may be considered the gold standard for measuring axial length in any type of cataract.

Repeatability and comparability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer in optical biometry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility in the measurement of ocular biometric parameters using a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and its comparability with an optical low coherence reflectometry biometer. DESIGN: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. METHODS: 45 right eyes of 45 patients diagnosed with cataract were included. Three successive biometric measurements with Anterion and one with Lenstar LS900 were performed on each patient. The following variables were collected: axial length (AXL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), flat K (K1), steep K (K2), central corneal thickness (CCT), lens thickness (LT) and white-to-white distance (WTW). The intrasubject standard deviation (Sw) and the coefficient of Pearson "R" were calculated in order to assess the repeatability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were obtained to evaluate the comparability between devices. A Bland-Altman plot was performed for each variable. RESULTS: The coefficient of Pearson was excellent and statistically significant in the evaluation of the repeatability in all the variables. The highest values were 0.987 (AXL), 0.983 (CCT) and 0.942 (ACD). There were no statically significant differences between repeated measurements with Anterion in all the parameters. The ICC and CCC were excellent in the evaluation of AXL, CCT and ACD, and were also good in regard to K1, K2, LT and WTW. CONCLUSIONS: Performing biometry with the SS-OCT Anterion is a reliable and reproducible procedure, and it is comparable with the Lenstar LS900.

Optical Biometry and Lens Power Calculations in 500 Phakic Patients: Axial Length and Corneal Curvature in the Fellow Eye.

Objective: In eyes with severe corneal pathology, biometric measurements of the corneal curvature (K) can be challenging. The aims of this study were to test whether K mean values from the fellow eye can be used as substitute in lens power calculations and to determine if similarity in axial length (AL) in a patient's two eyes implies similarity also in the corneal curvature. Methods and Analysis: A retrospective study of optical biometry measurements in 500 adults (1000 phakic eyes) that was scheduled for cataract surgery. Inclusion criteria were complete recordings of all parameters in both eyes and a signal-to-noise ratio of at least 10. Similar AL was defined as less than 0.3 mm difference between the patient's two eyes. Results: The IOL power calculated with K mean from the fellow eye was 0.39 D (standard deviation (SD) 0.57) different from the calculation with both AL and K mean from the correct eye. The difference was larger than 1.0 D in 26 (5%) eyes. In patients with similar AL in their two eyes (n = 372), the interocular difference in K mean was 0.43 D (SD 0.67 D), compared to 0.45 D (SD 0.49 D) for the patients with an AL difference of 0.3 mm or more (n = 128) (p = 0.81). Conclusion: Lens calculations with keratometry values from the fellow eye as substitute yielded quite similar results as calculations with the correct values. Hence, this seems to be an acceptable approach in patients with incomplete keratometry recordings. Similarity in AL between a person's two eyes did not imply more similar corneal curvatures.