Treatment adherence to oral chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Protocol for a hospital pharmacy-based real-world study.

OBJECTIVE: This article describes a study protocol for evaluating adherence to oral chemotherapy (OCT) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Spain. METHODS: This multicenter, observational, prospective study will be conducted by 6 hospital pharmacists from 6 Spanish hospitals. The study will include men and women aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who are being treated or have been prescribed OCT. Once included, the patient will be active and prospectively followed up for 3 months, including 4 study visits to record information on sociodemographic variables, antineoplastic treatment and adherence, pharmaceutical care, clinical variables, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) (the 3-level version of EQ-5D, the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire, and the PRO version of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). Twelve months after patient inclusion, we will record information on the disease progression status and dispensed prescriptions. The primary outcome is the percentage of treatment adherence that will be calculated based on the pill count as follows: the difference between the number of pills dispensed minus the number of unused pills will be divided by the number of days of treatment multiplied by the number of pills/day prescribed by the oncologist; this quotient will be multiplied by 100 to obtain the percentage of adherence. Based on the that pill count reconciliation, those with a percentage adherence >80% will be primarily categorized as adherent. Secondarily, treatment adherence will be also calculated based on the proportion of days covered and the 4-items Morisky Green Levine Medication Adherence Scale. To analyze the impact of patients' and treatment characteristics on adherence, bivariate analyses will be performed using different adherence cut-off points. To evaluate the impact of adherence on treatment efficacy as evaluated by progression-free survival, we will be using the Kaplan-Meier method and compare it with the log-rank test and univariate Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We expect that our study will provide initial information on key aspects of adherence to OCT (i.e., measurement, facilitators, and barriers) and its relationship with patients' and clinically relevant outcomes in the setting of NSCLC, and that this information will help in designing pharmaceutical interventions to improve adherence.

Nonadherence to oral cancer chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: prevalence and predictive factors in Vietnam.

PURPOSE: Standard oral cancer chemotherapy (OCT) or targeted therapy (OTT) has expanded the treatment methods for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its principal nonadherence causes a reduction in efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the status of nonadherence and influencing factors among outpatient patients with HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 2021, a prospective observational study was conducted on 384 patients with either old or newly diagnosed HCC treated with OTT. Nonadherence to OCT was determined using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, with a score < 6 points. The patients were finished with a six-month follow-up investigation by questionnaires. RESULTS: 54,8% of HCC outpatients were nonadherent to OCT, with a mean Morisky score of 5.19. They dropped out of the treatment mainly because of drug side effects, such as fatigue (72.4%), hand-foot syndrome (42.7%), diarrhea (38.3%), nausea (25%), insomnia (24.7%), abdominal pain (12%), and anxiety about these adverse events (65.9%). Additionally, financial difficulties and low relative copayments were significantly correlated with the noncompliant treatment of patients (OR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.32-3.98, P = 0.003; OR = 4.36, 95% CI = 0.95-19.93, P = 0.039, respectively). Moreover, inadequate individual information about the clinical course, the art of treatment, and medication usage instructions were suggestive barriers to adherence to treatment (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.08-3.55, P = 0.024; OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.1-3.14, P = 0.02; OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.29-4.26, P = 0.004, respectively). Finally, a low level of trust in doctors was an essential factor in nonadherence (Mean of the Anderson Trust in Physician Scale scores counted 38.12 vs. 43.97, respectively for non-adherence vs. adherence, P = 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a high rate of primary nonadherence to standard oral targeted therapy among HCC outpatient patients because of drug side effects, patient awareness of treatment, and lack of confidence in healthcare providers. Close supervision, proper medication instructions, appropriate dosage reductions, and comprehensive patient counseling might be necessary to control nonadherence.

Oral docetaxel plus encequidar - a phase 1 clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To determine the bioavailability, safety, and tolerability of a single dose of oral docetaxel plus encequidar (oDox + E) and compare its pharmacokinetic exposure with current standard of care IV docetaxel. INTRODUCTION: Docetaxel is a taxane widely used as an anti-neoplastic agent. Due to low oral bioavailability secondary to gut P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux, its current use is limited to intravenous administration. Oral docetaxel may provide a less resource intensive, more convenient, and tolerable alternative. Encequidar is a first in class, minimally absorbed, oral gut-specific P-gp inhibitor. We tested whether oDox + E can achieve comparable pharmacokinetic exposure to IV docetaxel. METHODS: A multicentre, phase I open-label, pharmacokinetic trial was undertaken to determine the bioavailability, safety, and tolerability of a single dose of oDox + E (at 75 mg/m2 + 15 mg, 150 mg/m2 + 15 mg, and 300 mg/m2 + 15 mg) in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) patients compared to standard of care IV docetaxel as prescribed by their oncologists. The 15 mg of Encequidar at each dose level was given one hour prior to oral docetaxel. RESULTS: 11 patients were enrolled; 9 patients completed the study. Oral docetaxel exposure increased with dose, achieving the highest at 300 mg/m2 oDox + E (with AUC0 - infinity of 1343.3 ± 443.0 ng.h/mL compared to the IV docetaxel AUC0 - infinity of 2000 ± 325 ng.h/mL) and became non-linear at 300 mg/m2. The mean absolute bioavailability of oDox + E across all 3 dose levels was 16.14% (range: 8.19-25.09%). No patient deaths, dose limiting toxicity, treatment-related serious adverse event or grade 4 toxicity were observed. Maximal tolerated dose was not reached. CONCLUSION: oDox + E has a safe and tolerable adverse event profile in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. The increase in oral bioavailability of oDox + E suggests a multi-dose oDox + E regimen could theoretically achieve exposures comparable with standard of care IV docetaxel. Further development to examine the optimal multiple dose regimen of oDox + E is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: U1111-1173-5473.

Impact of a pharmacist-led oral chemotherapy monitoring clinic at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System.

As cancer treatments shift from traditional intravenous chemotherapy to inclusion of oral oncolytics, there is a critical need for structured oral chemotherapy monitoring and follow-up programs. To provide continuous care and minimize clinical gaps to Veterans receiving oral chemotherapy, the hematology/oncology clinical pharmacy practitioners designed and initiated a pilot, pharmacist-driven, Oral Chemotherapy Monitoring Clinic at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System supported by an oral chemotherapy certified pharmacy technician. A retrospective evaluation of patients receiving oral chemotherapy at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System was performed before (Phase I) and after (Phase II) pilot implementation to assess the impact of an Oral Chemotherapy Monitoring Clinic on compliance with drug-specific lab and symptom monitoring. Complete monitoring was defined as 100% of recommended labs and symptoms assessed per cycle, partial monitoring was <100%, but >0%, and incomplete monitoring was defined as 0%. The primary outcome assessed the proportion of patients receiving complete monitoring in Phase II compared to Phase I. Most patients were male (94%), with a median age of 72 years. The most common oncolytic was abiraterone acetate. Overall, drug-specific baseline and follow-up laboratory and symptom monitoring was complete at a statistically significantly higher rate in Phase II compared with Phase I (p-value < 0.01). A significantly higher portion of patients in the Phase II cohort had a clinical pharmacy practitioner intervention (44% vs. 90%; p < 0.01). Monitoring for Veterans receiving oral chemotherapy was optimized with clinical pharmacy practitioner and certified pharmacy technician involvement while simultaneously alleviating Oncologist and nurse oral chemotherapy workload.

Fine-tuning the activation behaviors of ternary modular cabazitaxel prodrugs for efficient and on-target oral anti-cancer therapy.

The disulfide bond plays a crucial role in the design of anti-tumor prodrugs due to its exceptional tumor-specific redox responsiveness. However, premature breaking of disulfide bonds is triggered by small amounts of reducing substances (e.g., ascorbic acid, glutathione, uric acid and tea polyphenols) in the systemic circulation. This may lead to toxicity, particularly in oral prodrugs that require more frequent and high-dose treatments. Fine-tuning the activation kinetics of these prodrugs is a promising prospect for more efficient on-target cancer therapies. In this study, disulfide, steric disulfide, and ester bonds were used to bridge cabazitaxel (CTX) to an intestinal lymph vessel-directed triglyceride (TG) module. Then, synthetic prodrugs were efficiently incorporated into self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (corn oil and Maisine CC were used as the oil phase and Cremophor EL as the surfactant). All three prodrugs had excellent gastric stability and intestinal permeability. The oral bioavailability of the disulfide bond-based prodrugs (CTX-(C)S-(C)S-TG and CTX-S-S-TG) was 11.5- and 19.1-fold higher than that of the CTX solution, respectively, demonstrating good oral delivery efficiency. However, the excessive reduction sensitivity of the disulfide bond resulted in lower plasma stability and safety of CTX-S-S-TG than that of CTX-(C)S-(C)S-TG. Moreover, introducing steric hindrance into disulfide bonds could also modulate drug release and cytotoxicity, significantly improving the anti-tumor activity even compared to that of intravenous CTX solution at half dosage while minimizing off-target adverse effects. Our findings provide insights into the design and fine-tuning of different disulfide bond-based linkers, which may help identify oral prodrugs with more potent therapeutic efficacy and safety for cancer therapy.

Factors affecting medication adherence in patients using oral chemotherapy: A descriptive study.

INTRODUCTION: The utilization of oral chemotherapy agents for cancer treatment has witnessed a steady rise in recent years. The pivotal determinant for the success of oral chemotherapy lies in the adherence of cancer patients to the prescribed treatment. This study aims to explore oral chemotherapy adherence and identify factors influencing medication adherence among cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 103 cancer patients participated in this descriptive study. Data were collected using the Oral Chemotherapy Adherence Scale, the Turkish Translation of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ-T) and The Functional Living Index-Cancer. RESULTS: Of the participants, 66% reported good adherence to oral chemotherapy. Key findings indicate that access to health services (ß = -1.473, p = 0.009), cancer stage (ß = -1.570, p = 0.015) and the BMQ-T subscale of General Overuse (ß = .696, p = 0.041) were independent predictors of medication adherence. CONCLUSION: The study observed medication non-adherence in one-third of patients undergoing oral chemotherapy. Primary contributors to non-adherence included difficulties in accessing health services, advanced cancer stage and the belief that drugs are over-recommended by doctors. These results underscore the need for a heightened focus on preventable factors, such as improving access to health services and addressing beliefs about drug overuse, to enhance medication adherence in patients receiving oral chemotherapy.

Identifying metrics and designing measurable outcomes in the electronic health record to evaluate pharmacist intervention in an oral chemotherapy program.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the increased utilization of oral anticancer agents, pharmacist-led oral anticancer programs have emerged to meet the needs of oral anticancer management. Currently, at Froedtert & MCW, there is a lack of established tools to collect metrics which demonstrate the value of a pharmacist-led oral anticancer program. METHODS: The purpose of this project is to establish metrics that reflect the interventions pharmacists are performing, and second, to develop a documentation tool which can reliably extract discrete data on the identified metrics. RESULTS: Eight of the 10 desired metrics were included in the documentation tool. Two questionnaires were created to allow for easy data retrieval of the metrics. The "initial" questionnaire focuses on interventions made at the time of starting an oral anticancer agent, while the "follow-up" questionnaire focuses on interventions made during the subsequent monitoring. The introduction of the questionnaire tool was well received by end users and did not add to the pharmacist's overall workload. CONCLUSIONS: By establishing metrics that reflect pharmacist interventions in a pharmacist-led oral anticancer program and creating a documentation tool to collect discrete data related to those metrics from the electronic health record, we at Froedtert & MCW are better able describe the workload of the ambulatory oncology pharmacists with regard to their interventions and monitoring of oral anticancer agents. This data will be used to establish differences in pharmacist workload between clinics, justify pharmacist resources, and provide a snapshot of the patient population served as part of the oral anticancer program.

Defining the Role and Responsibilities of the Oral Anticancer Medication Nurse Navigator.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this article is to define the role and responsibilities of the oral anticancer medication nurse navigator. METHODS: This article combines findings from a review of scientific literature including research studies, quality improvement projects, case studies, standards, and guidelines combined with the experience and professional insights of the authors in the role creation and function of the oral anticancer medication nurse navigator. RESULTS: The role of the oral anticancer medication nurse navigator includes coordination of patient care, pre-treatment assessment of barriers to adherence, patient and caregiver education, planned follow-up and coaching, and symptom management. Professionally, the role includes the development of interdisciplinary workflows, coordination of care with internal and external stakeholders, clinical staff education, the application of technology, and advocacy. CONCLUSION: The oral anticancer medication nurse navigator uses the nursing process to coordinate care of the individual taking these medications. The role optimizes patient outcomes and benefits the healthcare organization through reduced healthcare costs and the ability to meet accreditation needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: The role of the oral anticancer medication nurse navigator provides value to patients taking oral anticancer medications and to the healthcare team.

Oral chemotherapy versus observation alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with persistently detected circulating cell-free Epstein-Barr virus DNA during follow-up.

AIM: Despite the high risk of tumor recurrence, patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with persistently (at least twice) detected circulating cell-free Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels during follow-up are routinely recommended to keep observation. For these patients, whether administering more aggressive treatment could improve survival outcomes remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 431 patients with nonmetastatic NPC with persistently detected EBV DNA during follow-up, who do not have clinical or imaging evidence of recurrence. Among these patients, 79 were administered oral chemotherapy, and the remaining 352 underwent observation alone. Baseline characteristics were balanced with propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. The primary endpoint was modified disease-free survival (mDFS), defined as time from detectable EBV DNA result to tumor recurrence or death. The secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: One-to-three PSM resulted in 251 eligible patients (oral chemotherapy group, 73; observation group, 178). In the matched cohort, the oral chemotherapy group had higher median mDFS (12.9 months [95 % confidence interval [CI] 9.6-16.3] vs. 6.8 months [95 % CI 5.8-7.8], p = 0.009) and DFS (24.1 months [95 % CI 18.5-29.7] vs. 16.7 months [95 % CI 14.4-19.1], p = 0.035) than the observation group. The median OS was numerically higher in the oral chemotherapy group than in the observation group (57.9 months [95 % CI 42.5-73.3] vs. 50.8 months [95 % CI 39.7-61.9], p = 0.71). A consistent benefit favoring oral chemotherapy was observed for mDFS in all subgroups analyses for male, <45 years, stage III-IVa disease, pretreatment EBV DNA load ≥ 4,000 copies/mL, no induction chemotherapy, or a detectable EBV DNA load ≥ 1,200 copies/mL. After adjusting for other confounders in the multivariate analysis, oral chemotherapy remained a significantly favorable factor for both mDFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95 % CI 0.50-0.89; p = 0.006) and DFS (HR 0.68, 95 % CI 0.51-0.91; p = 0.01), but not a significant factor for OS (HR 0.89, 95 % CI 0.62-1.27; p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NPC having persistently detected EBV DNA levels but without clinical or imaging evidence of recurrence during follow-up, oral chemotherapy significantly prolongs mDFS and DFS. Employing oral chemotherapy as a more aggressive treatment option, as opposed to mere observation, could potentially benefit these patients, although further prospective validation is necessitated.

Spotlight on capecitabine for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic carcinoma of various origin: A retrospective study of 25 dogs.

Capecitabine, the oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, is indicated in people to treat various malignant epithelial cancers. In dogs, capecitabine has not been extensively evaluated. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate toxicity and preliminary efficacy of single agent capecitabine in dogs with advanced malignant epithelial cancers of any site, for which no effective therapy existed, conventional treatment failed or was declined. Capecitabine was administered orally at 750 mg/m2 from day 1 to 14, followed by 1-week rest period, given as 3-week cycles. Safety evaluation was performed after 2 cycles, and every 2-3 cycles thereafter. Tumour response was determined every 2-3 cycles. Twenty-five dogs with hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 6), lung papillary carcinoma (n = 4), anal sac adenocarcinoma (n = 3), colic adenocarcinoma (n = 2), and other individually represented epithelial cancers (n = 10) were included. Dogs received a median of 4 cycles (range, 2-43) for a median of 84 days (range, 42-913). Toxicity occurred in 17 (68.0%) dogs; the most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal, with the majority being self-resolving and of mild grade. Of the 22 dogs with macroscopic disease, 3 (13.6%) achieved partial remission, 16 (72.7%) were stable and 3 (13.6%) progressed; overall clinical benefit rate was 86.4%. Median progression-free interval was 93 days (95% CI 42-154; range, 1-521) and median tumour-specific survival was 273 days (95% CI 116-482; range 45-913). These findings suggest that capecitabine is an attractive option for the treatment of several types of carcinomas in dogs. Prospective studies are warranted to optimize the scheduling of capecitabine and confirm its efficacy.

Development of oral oncolytic nonadherence estimator (ORACLE): A pretreatment nonadherence risk assessment for oral oncolytics.

INTRODUCTION: To date, there is no adherence estimator to identify risk of nonadherence prior to initiating oral oncolytics. METHODS: A workgroup was assembled through the National Community Oncology Dispensing Association and tasked with creating a tool to meet this need. Tool constructs were defined after a review of the literature identifying top barriers to adherence. A second literature search was conducted to identify questions targeting specific barriers from validated adherence questionnaires. Once a finalized draft was complete, the risk assessment tool was built into an electronic survey where a risk category can be automatically calculated for the patient. RESULTS: The six most impactful factors affecting compliance to oral oncolytics were identified as patient's confidence, health literacy, perception of treatment, quality of life, social support, and complexity of chemotherapy regimen. A six-item questionnaire was created with five patient-directed questions and one clinician-directed question. Examples and descriptions were provided for clinicians to consider when categorizing complexity of a regimen. The tool was designed for responses to each question to be indexed into categories through a 10-point system. Results will be stratified into low, moderate, or high risk for nonadherence. CONCLUSION: The creation of a tool to predict nonadherence prior to starting therapy is an unmet need for patients initiating oral oncolytics. The aim of this tool is to meet those needs and better guide clinicians to provide patients with strategies to better manage nonadherence. Next steps include tool validation and piloting in clinical practice.

Improving Pharmacist-Led Pediatric Patient Education on Oral Chemotherapy at Home.

Oral chemotherapy (OC) has been increasingly used in pediatric patients diagnosed with cancer, which is primarily managed in the outpatient setting. Different from adults, pediatric patients face unique challenges in administering these hazardous medications at home. Because of the complexity of pediatric pharmaceutical care and the hazardous nature of chemotherapy agents, comprehensive patient education is imperative to mitigate the potential safety risks associated with OC administration at home. Pharmacists play a vital role in patient education and medication consultations. However, the lack of practice guidelines and limited resources supporting OC counseling are noted. Additional barriers include insufficient knowledge and training on OC, which can be improved by continuing education. In a regional children's hospital, a comprehensive OC education checklist was developed for pediatric patients and their caregivers to standardize consultations led by pharmacists. An infographic OC handout was also formulated to improve patient knowledge and awareness. Moreover, innovative approaches such as using telepharmacy, smartphone applications, and artificial intelligence have been increasingly integrated into patient care, which can help optimize OC consultations for children and adolescents. Further studies are warranted to enhance oral chemotherapy education specifically tailored for pediatric patients in outpatient settings.

Cost-Utility and Budget Impact Analyses of Oral Chemotherapy for Stage III Colorectal Cancer: Real-World Evidence after Policy Implementation in Thailand.

This study conducted a cost-utility analysis and a budget impact analysis (BIA) of outpatient oral chemotherapy versus inpatient intravenous chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) in Thailand. A Markov model was constructed to estimate the lifetime cost and health outcomes based on a societal perspective. Eight chemotherapy strategies were compared. Clinical and cost data on adjuvant chemotherapy were collected from the medical records of 1747 patients at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. The cost-effectiveness results were interpreted against a Thai willingness-to-pay threshold of USD 5003/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. A 5-year BIA was performed. Of the eight strategies, CAPOX then FOLFIRI yielded the highest life-year and QALY gains. Its total lifetime cost was also the highest. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CAPOX then FOLFIRI compared to 5FU/LV then FOLFOX, a commonly used regimen USD was 4258 per QALY gained.The BIA showed that when generic drug prices were applied, 5-FU/LV then FOLFOX had the smallest budgetary impact (USD 9.1 million). CAPOX then FOLFIRI required an approximately three times higher budgetary level (USD 25.1 million). CAPOX then FOLFIRI is the best option. It is cost-effective compared with 5-FU/LV then FOLFOX. However, policymakers should consider the relatively high budgetary burden of the CAPOX then FOLFIRI regimen.

Advanced practice nurse management in multiple myeloma treated with oral therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic approaches in Multiple Myeloma (MM) have considerably changed over the last few years, with effective oral chemotherapy and continuous treatment. In this context, the objective of this study was to examine the circuitry of an advanced practitioner nurse (APN)-led intervention that provided supportive care for MM patients treated with oral chemotherapy. METHODS: This population-based study was conducted at the hematology department - Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth (ICLN, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez), from April 2017 to September 2020. A follow-up program was established with a specialized APN in oncology. RESULTS: All APN interventions were recorded, representing 1240 phone calls and 162 consultations for 42 MM patients. Eighty-two calls were referred to the physician with 45 consultations triggered. Most of the calls were frequent within the few first months, with a high request for information and reassurance, especially for treatment-naive or relapsed patients. In our study, the APN was able to manage multiple side effects through care organization (i.e., hospitalizations, transfusions) and a careful coordination between the primary care team and the hospital. DISCUSSION: In order to respond to the high need for care pathway and safety improvement, especially in elderly population, we have initiated an original follow-up by an APN for MM patients treated with oral chemotherapy. While the role of APN has become prominent in the oncology field in recent years, its holistic approach has to be emphasized in further studies to bring a comprehensive perspective to health care coordination in the future.

pH-triggered dynamic erosive small molecule chlorambucil nano-prodrugs mediate robust oral chemotherapy.

Currently, the dynamic erosive small molecule nano-prodrug is of great demand for oral chemotherapy, owing to its precise structure, high drug loading and improved oral bioavailability via overcoming various physiologic barriers in gastrointestinal tract, blood circulation and tumor tissues compared to other oral nanomedicines. Herein, this work highlights the successful development of pH-triggered dynamic erosive small molecule nano-prodrugs based on in vivo significant pH changes, which are synthesized via amide reaction between chlorambucil and star-shaped ortho esters. The precise nano-prodrugs exhibit extraordinarily high drug loading (68.16%), electric neutrality, strong hydrophobicity, and dynamic large-to-small size transition from gastrointestinal pH to tumoral pH. These favorable physicochemical properties can effectively facilitate gastrointestinal absorption, blood circulation stability, tumor accumulation, cellular uptake, and cytotoxicity, therefore achieving high oral relative bioavailability (358.72%) and significant tumor growth inhibition while decreasing side effects. Thus, this work may open a new avenue for robust oral chemotherapy attractive for clinical translation.

Solid amorphous formulations for enhancing solubility and inhibiting Erlotinib crystallization during gastric-to-intestinal transfer.

The objective of this study was to improve the solubility and inhibit the crystallisation during the gastric-to-intestinal transfer of Erlotinib (ERL), a small molecule kinase inhibitor (smKI) compound class, which is classified as class II drug in the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS). A screening approach combining different parameters (solubility in aqueous media, inhibitory effect of drug crystallisation from supersaturated drug solutions) was applied to selected polymers for the development of solid amorphous dispersions of ERL. ERL solid amorphous dispersions formulations were then prepared with 3 different polymers (Soluplus®, HPMC-AS-L, HPMC-AS-H) at a fixed drug: polymer ratio (1:4) by two different production methods (spray drying and hot melt extrusion). The spray-dried particles and cryo-milled extrudates were characterized by thermal properties, shape and particle size, solubility and dissolution behavior in aqueous media. The influence of the manufacturing process on these solid characteristics was also identified during this study. Based on the obtained results, it is concluded that the cryo-milled extrudates of HPMC-AS-L displayed better performance (enhanced solubility, reduced ERL crystallization during the simulated gastric-to-intestinal transfer) and represents a promising amorphous solid dispersion formulation for oral administration of ERL.

Implementation and evaluation of a shared care model between oncologists and pharmacists for breast cancer patients at a Canadian regional ambulatory cancer centre.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of CDK 4/6 inhibitors for breast cancer patients has contributed to increased ambulatory patient visits for oncologists. The Medication Assessment by Pharmacist program aims to evaluate the impact of oncology pharmacists performing medication assessment follow-up visits. METHODS: Breast cancer patients on a CDK 4/6 inhibitor deemed suitable by their oncologist for pharmacist assessment could be booked for a pharmacist medication assessment appointment at alternate treatment cycles. RESULTS: Between February 2019 to November 2021, 29 of 128 patients (22.7%) were selected for 46 total Medication Assessment by Pharmacist visits resulting in 920 min of clinic time savings for physicians. There were similar rates of adhering to provincial protocols for scheduling visits (99% vs. 96%, p = 0.12) and monitoring investigations (98% vs. 98%, p = 0.96) between those enrolled in Medication Assessment by Pharmacist or not. Surveys completed by medical oncologists and pharmacists demonstrated that nine of nine oncologists felt Medication Assessment by Pharmacist reduced workload and wanted Medication Assessment by Pharmacist expanded to additional oncology drugs. Pharmacist-completed surveys revealed that nine of nine pharmacists felt Medication Assessment by Pharmacist increased job satisfaction, and allowed further application of clinical skills. All agreed that patients were receptive to meeting with pharmacists. According to survey results, 33% of oncologists versus 100% of pharmacists routinely asked about medication adherence, new medications or supplements. CONCLUSION: Integrating pharmacists into a shared care model reduces ambulatory patient visits for oncologists without deviating from provincial protocol guidelines for monitoring and visits for patients on CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Leveraging the medication expertise of pharmacists also increases the frequency of addressing medication adherence and concurrent therapies. Medication Assessment by Pharmacist may be an effective strategy in alleviating projected shortages of oncology providers.

Active Pharmacovigilance Study: A Follow-Up Model of Oral Anti-Cancer Drugs under Additional Monitoring.

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are responsible for almost 5% of hospital admissions, making it necessary to implement different pharmacovigilance strategies. The additional monitoring (AM) concept has been highlighted and intended to increase the number of suspected ADRs reported, namely in medicines with limited safety data. A prospective, descriptive study of active pharmacovigilance (AP) was conducted between 2019 and 2021 in the Local Health Unit of Matosinhos (LHUM) (Porto, Portugal). A model of AP for medicines under AM, namely oral antineoplastic agents, was designed. Follow-up consultations were performed, and adverse events (AEs) data were collected. The overall response to the treatment was evaluated through the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. A total of 52 patients were included in the study, and 14 antineoplastic drugs under AM were analyzed. Of the total number of patients included, only 29 developed at least one type of toxicity. Hematological disorders were the most reported suspected ADR. However, only four patients interrupted their treatment due to toxicity. After 12 months of treatment, most patients had disease progression, which was the main reason for therapy discontinuation. This AP model played an important role in the early detection of AEs and, consequently, contributed to better management of them. Increasing the number of suspected ADR reports is crucial for drugs with limited safety data.

Diseño y validación de una escala de adherencia a antineoplásicos orales / Design and validation of an adherence scale to oral antineoplastic drugs

Objetivo: diseñar y validar una escala para medir la adherencia a antineoplásicos orales. Disponer de una herramienta sencilla, validada y aplicable a la rutina asistencial que permitirá detectar e identificar la falta de adherencia para establecer estrategias que permitan mejorarla y optimizar la calidad de los servicios sanitarios.Métodoestudio de validación de una escala diseñada para evaluar la adherencia a antineoplásicos orales en una muestra de pacientes ambulatorios que recogen su medicación en 4 hospitales españoles. Se analizará su validez y fiabilidad, elaborada a partir de un estudio previo de metodología cualitativa, mediante la teoría clásica de los test y el análisis Rasch. Se examinará su funcionamiento, el ajuste de los ítems, la estructura de respuesta y de las personas a las predicciones del modelo, así como la dimensionalidad, la fiabilidad ítem-persona, la adecuación del nivel de dificultad de los ítems a la muestra, y el funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems en función del sexo. (AU)

Objective: To design and validate a questionnaire to measure adherence to oral antineoplastic drugs. The availability of a simple, validated tool that can be applied to routine care will make it possible to detect and identify non-adherence in order to establish strategies to improve adherence and optimize the quality of healthcare services.MethodValidation study of the questionnaire designed to assess adherence to antineoplastic drugs in a sample of outpatients who collect their medication in two Spanish hospitals. Its validity and reliability will be analyzed, based on a previous qualitative methodology study, using classical test theory and Rasch analysis. We will examine its performance, item fit, response structure and person fit to the predictions of the model, as well as dimensionality, item-person reliability, the appropriateness of the level of difficulty of the items to the sample, and the differential performance of the items according to gender.

Patient-reported outcomes for oral oncolytic therapy: A pilot study utilizing an electronic patient portal in a community cancer center.

OBJECTIVE: A pilot project was initiated to determine the feasibility of using an electronic patient portal, MyChart, for documentation of patient-reported outcomes for those receiving treatment with an oral oncolytic. METHODS: Documentation of patient-reported outcomes within the electronic medical record before and after implementing questionnaires through the use of MyChart was compared. Additional outcomes that were assessed included patient confidence and satisfaction, adherence rate, side effects, and documentation of provider interventions. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that the use of an electronic patient portal significantly increased the number of encounters documented within the electronic medical record from 1.8% (N = 19 patients; 1 out of 55 potential encounters; retrospective analysis) to 27.5% (N = 15 patients; 14 out of 51 potential encounters; prospective analysis) for those who utilized an electronic patient portal (p < 0.001). Patient confidence and satisfaction were high, the adherence rate was 100% at 4 months, and side effects were generally mild. Provider follow-up was documented in the electronic medical record in 6 out of 8 patients when a flagged response was identified. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study indicates that the use of an electronic patient portal, MyChart, was feasible and improved documentation of patient-reported outcomes within the electronic medical record. Several information technologies and patient barriers were encountered throughout. Careful selection of patients who will embrace this technology is important.