PHENOL VERSUS LIDOCAINE IN OBTURATOR NERVE NEUROLYSIS FOR HIP JOINT PAIN.

Introduction: For patients with severe hip osteoarthritis without clinical or socioeconomic conditions for total hip replacement, the obturator nerve block may serve for pain control and functional improvement. Either lidocaine or phenol are used, although the latter is expected to last longer. Objectives: Compare hip pain and functional performance after obturator nerve block with phenol versus lidocaine in patients with severe hip osteoarthritis who failed conservative treatment. Methodology: Forty-four patients scheduled for total arthroplasty due to severe osteoarthritis were randomized to the anterior branch of the obturator nerve with phenol (PG) or 1% lidocaine (LG), guided by electrical stimulation. Patients were evaluated with VAS, WOMAC, and pressure pain dolorimetry before the procedure and in the first and fourth months afterward. Results: Both groups improved significantly in pain control, pressure dolorimetry and functioning in the first month with reduced effect after 4 months, although the scores were still better than baseline. No statistical difference could be noticed between the groups. Severe adverse effects were not reported. Conclusion: Both lidocaine and phenol are equally effective and safe in the obturator nerve block for the control of pain and improvement in functioning in patients with severe hip OA. Evidence Level I; Randomized control trial, double-blind .

Introdução: Em pacientes com osteoartrite grave do quadril, sem condições clínicas ou socioeconômicas para a substituição total do quadril, o bloqueio do nervo obturador pode servir para o controle da dor e ganho funcional. Pode-se usar lidocaína ou fenol, embora seja esperado que o último apresente maior duração. Objetivo: Comparar a dor no quadril e o desempenho funcional após o bloqueio do nervo obturador com fenol versus lidocaína em pacientes com osteoartrite grave do quadril que não obtiveram sucesso no tratamento conservador. Metodologia: Quarenta e quatro pacientes programados para artroplastia total devido à osteoartrite grave foram randomizados para o ramo anterior do nervo obturador com fenol (PG) ou lidocaína a 1% (LG), guiados por estimulação elétrica. Os pacientes foram avaliados com EVA, WOMAC e dolorimetria de dor por pressão antes do procedimento e no primeiro e quarto meses seguintes. Resultados: Ambos os grupos apresentaram melhora significativa no controle da dor, na dolorimetria por pressão e na funcionalidade no primeiro mês, com efeito reduzido após quatro meses, embora as pontuações ainda fossem melhores do que a linha de base. Não foi possível observar nenhuma diferença estatística entre os grupos. Não foram relatados efeitos adversos graves. Conclusão: Tanto a lidocaína quanto o fenol são igualmente eficazes e seguros no bloqueio do nervo obturador para o controle da dor e melhora da funcionalidade em pacientes com OA grave de quadril. Nível de evidência I; Estudo clínico randomizado,duplo cego .

When are patients with osteoarthritis referred for surgery?

Current treatment strategies in hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) involve a combined approach that includes not only modification of risk factors and conservative treatment but also joint-preserving surgical therapy in the early stages, or joint replacement in late OA. With the recent development of new etiological concepts (i.e. hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement as major risk factors for hip OA), treatment alternatives for joint preservation could be extended significantly. Satisfactory results of osteotomies and other reconstructive procedures around hip and knee joints can only be expected in early OA (Kellgren/Lawrence grade 0-II). If patients with advanced radiographic OA grades III-IV do not respond to conservative treatment over at least 3 months and express a relevant burden of disease, joint replacement might be considered. Prior to surgery, potential contraindications must be excluded, patient expectations need to be discussed, and modifiable risk factors, which may negatively influence the outcome, should be optimized.

Rasch Analysis of Joint Replacement Version for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome in Individuals With Advanced Osteoarthritis of Hip Awaiting Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine measurement properties of the Joint replacement version for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-JR) using Rasch analysis in patients with osteoarthritis of hip (HOA). DESIGN: Cross-sectional clinical measurement SETTING: Patient outcomes database at a tertiary care hospital PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sampling of patients with HOA scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (N=327) OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: The data for pre-surgery assessments for patients with HOA were extracted from an existing database. Variables extracted included HOOS-JR scores, demographic information (age, sex), health-related data, and anthropometric variables. The assumptions of Rasch model such as the test of fit, fit residuals, ordering of item thresholds, factor structure, DIF, internal consistency and Pearson separation index were examined for the HOOS-JR scores. RESULTS: The HOOS-JR showed adequate overall fit to the Rasch model, logically ordered response thresholds, no floor or ceiling effects, and high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.91). The HOOS-JR did not satisfy the assumption of unidimensionality, albeit the violation of this assumption was marginal (6.12% over 5%). Person-item threshold distribution (difference between person and item means were equal to 0.92 which was less than 1 logit unit) confirmed that the HOOS-JR scores were well targeted. CONCLUSIONS: Given that the violation of unidimensionality for HOOS-JR was marginal, we recommend further studies to validate this finding. Results broadly support the use of HOOS-JR for assessing hip health in patients with HOA.

Improved visualization of the bone-implant interface and osseointegration in ex vivo acetabular cup implants using photon-counting detector CT.

BACKGROUND: Successful osseointegration of joint replacement implants is required for long-term implant survival. Accurate assessment of osseointegration could enable clinical discrimination of failed implants from other sources of pain avoiding unnecessary surgeries. Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) provides improvements in image resolution compared to conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT), possibly allowing better visualization of bone-implant-interfaces and osseointegration. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of visualization of bone-implant-interfaces and osseointegration in acetabular cup implants, using PCD-CT compared with EID-CT. METHODS: Two acetabular implants (one cemented, one uncemented) retrieved during revision surgery were scanned using PCD-CT and EID-CT at equal radiation dose. Images were reconstructed using different reconstruction kernels and iterative strengths. Delineation of the bone-implant and bone-cement-interface as an indicator of osseointegration was scored subjectively for image quality by four radiologists on a Likert scale and assessed quantitatively. RESULTS: Delineation of bone-implant and bone-cement-interfaces was better with PCD-CT compared with EID-CT (p ≤ 0.030). The highest ratings were given for PCD-CT at sharper kernels for the cemented cup (PCD-CT, median 5, interquartile range 4.25-5.00 versus EID-CT, 3, 2.00-3.75, p < 0.001) and the uncemented cup (5, 4.00-5.00 versus 2, 2-2, respectively, p < 0.001). The bone-implant-interface was 35-42% sharper and the bone-cement-interface was 28-43% sharper with PCD-CT compared with EID-CT, depending on the reconstruction kernel. CONCLUSIONS: PCD-CT might enable a more accurate assessment of osseointegration of orthopedic joint replacement implants. KEY POINTS: • The bone-implant interface ex vivo showed superior visualization using photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) compared to energy-integrating detector computed tomography. • Harder reconstruction kernels in PCD-CT provide sharper images with lower noise levels. • These improvements in imaging might make it possible to visualize osseointegration in vivo.

The effect of systemic iron status on osteoarthritis: A mendelian randomization study.

Objective: To assess the causal effect of systemic iron status by using four biomarkers (serum iron; transferrin saturation; ferritin; total iron-binding capacity) on knee osteoarthritis (OA), hip OA, total knee replacement, and total hip replacement using 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design. Methods: Three instrument sets were used to construct the genetic instruments for the iron status: Liberal instruments (variants associated with one of the iron biomarkers), sensitivity instruments (liberal instruments exclude variants associated with potential confounders), and conservative instruments (variants associated with all four iron biomarkers). Summary-level data for four OA phenotypes, including knee OA, hip OA, total knee replacement, and total hip replacement were obtained from the largest genome-wide meta-analysis with 826,690 individuals. Inverse-variance weighted based on the random-effect model as the main approach was conducted. Weighted median, MR-Egger, and Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier methods were used as sensitivity MR approaches. Results: Based on liberal instruments, genetically predicted serum iron and transferrin saturation were significantly associated with hip OA and total hip replacement, but not with knee OA and total knee replacement. Statistical evidence of heterogeneity across the MR estimates indicated that mutation rs1800562 was the SNP significantly associated with hip OA in serum iron (odds ratio, OR = 1.48), transferrin saturation (OR = 1.57), ferritin (OR = 2.24), and total-iron binding capacity (OR = 0.79), and hip replacement in serum iron (OR = 1.45), transferrin saturation (OR = 1.25), ferritin (OR = 1.37), and total-iron binding capacity (OR = 0.80). Conclusion: Our study suggests that high iron status might be a causal factor of hip OA and total hip replacement where rs1800562 is the main contributor.

Nocturnal pain, is the pain different compared with pain during the day? An exploratory cross-sectional study in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore characteristics of nocturnal pain and to identify differences in participants' characteristics and osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms between hip and knee OA participants with and without nocturnal pain. METHODS: Data for this exploratory cross-sectional study were obtained from an online survey, distributed through social media and patient associations in the period from April 2020 until May 2020, which was conducted in 101 participants with (self-reported) hip or knee OA. Descriptive statistics were used to provide insight into the characteristics of the study population. Pain intensity, localization, dimension, and impact of (nocturnal) pain on sleep were described and compared with daytime pain. RESULTS: Nocturnal pain was reported by 76/101 (75%) participants. Participants with nocturnal pain scored higher visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for their nocturnal pain compared with their pain at the moment (respectively: median VAS score 49.5 vs. 40.0). Their day pain rating indexes of sensory-discriminative dimension were higher compared with their nocturnal pain. Comparison between participants with and without nocturnal pain showed that participants with nocturnal pain were affected by intermittent, constant, and radiating pain. Pain had more impact on their sleep and they scored their pain at its worst higher compared with participants without nocturnal pain. CONCLUSION: In participants with nocturnal pain (75%), we found that their VAS pain scores were not in harmony with their pain expressed in words. This study increases awareness of nocturnal pain in OA patients in general practice. More research is needed to provide general practitioners possible interventions for patients with OA and nocturnal pain.

Nocturnal pain is an important part of the pain experience in osteoarthritis (OA) and highlighted as key concern by patients with hip and knee OA. Reports have shown a wide range in prevalence of nocturnal hip and knee pain in OA patients (14%­85%). We found that participants with nocturnal pain (76/101 = 75%) were more often affected by both intermittent and constant pain, reported higher pain scores for pain at its worst and pain had more impact on their sleep compared with those without nocturnal pain. Participants with nocturnal pain scored higher visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for their nocturnal pain compared with their pain at the moment. On the other hand, they scored the pain expressed in words higher for their day pain than for their nocturnal pain. More research is needed to explore factors that associate with nocturnal pain and to explore how healthcare professionals can support people with nocturnal pain.

Phenol versus lidocaine in obturator nerve neurolysis for hip joint pain / Fenol contra lidocaina em neurólise do nervo obturador para dor articular do quadril

ABSTRACT Introduction: For patients with severe hip osteoarthritis without clinical or socioeconomic conditions for total hip replacement, the obturator nerve block may serve for pain control and functional improvement. Either lidocaine or phenol are used, although the latter is expected to last longer. Objectives: Compare hip pain and functional performance after obturator nerve block with phenol versus lidocaine in patients with severe hip osteoarthritis who failed conservative treatment. Methodology: Forty-four patients scheduled for total arthroplasty due to severe osteoarthritis were randomized to the anterior branch of the obturator nerve with phenol (PG) or 1% lidocaine (LG), guided by electrical stimulation. Patients were evaluated with VAS, WOMAC, and pressure pain dolorimetry before the procedure and in the first and fourth months afterward. Results: Both groups improved significantly in pain control, pressure dolorimetry and functioning in the first month with reduced effect after 4 months, although the scores were still better than baseline. No statistical difference could be noticed between the groups. Severe adverse effects were not reported. Conclusion: Both lidocaine and phenol are equally effective and safe in the obturator nerve block for the control of pain and improvement in functioning in patients with severe hip OA. Evidence Level I; Randomized control trial, double-blind .

RESUMO Introdução: Em pacientes com osteoartrite grave do quadril, sem condições clínicas ou socioeconômicas para a substituição total do quadril, o bloqueio do nervo obturador pode servir para o controle da dor e ganho funcional. Pode-se usar lidocaína ou fenol, embora seja esperado que o último apresente maior duração. Objetivo: Comparar a dor no quadril e o desempenho funcional após o bloqueio do nervo obturador com fenol versus lidocaína em pacientes com osteoartrite grave do quadril que não obtiveram sucesso no tratamento conservador. Metodologia: Quarenta e quatro pacientes programados para artroplastia total devido à osteoartrite grave foram randomizados para o ramo anterior do nervo obturador com fenol (PG) ou lidocaína a 1% (LG), guiados por estimulação elétrica. Os pacientes foram avaliados com EVA, WOMAC e dolorimetria de dor por pressão antes do procedimento e no primeiro e quarto meses seguintes. Resultados: Ambos os grupos apresentaram melhora significativa no controle da dor, na dolorimetria por pressão e na funcionalidade no primeiro mês, com efeito reduzido após quatro meses, embora as pontuações ainda fossem melhores do que a linha de base. Não foi possível observar nenhuma diferença estatística entre os grupos. Não foram relatados efeitos adversos graves. Conclusão: Tanto a lidocaína quanto o fenol são igualmente eficazes e seguros no bloqueio do nervo obturador para o controle da dor e melhora da funcionalidade em pacientes com OA grave de quadril. Nível de evidência I; Estudo clínico randomizado,duplo cego .

Do Spinopelvic Parameters Relate with Secondary Hip Spine Syndrome in Secondary Hip Arthritis?

Background: The prevalence of low back pain (LBP) with primary osteoarthritis (OA) hip undergoing total hip replacement (THA) has been studied. However, secondary OA hip affects younger individuals where changes in the sagittal spinal parameters (SSPs) could be reversible to reduce LBP. The study aims to document changes in clinical and radiological parameters following THA. Methods: Thirty patients with secondary OA hip were included in the prospective analysis, excluding anyone with previous spine/hip surgery of known spinal diseases, including deformity, inflammatory or infective pathology. Visual analog scale for (VAS) hip and LBP, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Harris core (HHS) along with SSPs were measured at baseline and three months and analyzed. Results:  Mean age was 42.8 ± 8.9 years which 17 unilateral (U/L) and 13 bilateral (B/L) OA. Overall, no significant changes were seen in SSPs that included pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) was seen except for an improvement in the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) [40.22 ± 36.67 to 24.06 ± 21.93, p < 0.001]. However, clinical variables such as VAS hip and LBP, ODI, and HHS improved post-hip THA. Similar findings were seen in sub-group analysis when U/L affected were compared to B/L affected. Conclusion: The sagittal SSPs except SVA does not change significantly following THA in patients with secondary OA, though LBP improves clinically. Hence, we assume routine measurement of these parameters is not mandatory when planning for THA in these patients.

[Treatment options for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and osteoarthritis]. / Behandlungsoptionen bei femoroazetabulärem Impingement-Syndrom und Koxarthrose.

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a prearthritic deformity. Many patients with FAIS show signs of osteoarthritis at the time of initial presentation. Ideally, surgical correction of FAIS should stop the progression of osteoarthritis. However, biological changes in the joint, inflammatory processes, and patient-specific factors, which are not influenced by surgery, show a role in the progression of joint degeneration. Thus, it is not surprising that the results of joint-preserving surgery in FAIS and osteoarthritis Tönnis grade 2 and higher are bad, and patients often need to undergo total hip replacement (THR).Even in patients with initial osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 1) the results of joint-preserving surgery are significantly worse in comparison to in patients without osteoarthritis. As this pathology occurs mainly in young patients, efforts should be made to avoid THR, as the risk of loosening and revision surgery is increased. Analysis of risk factors that lead to worse outcome in joint-preserving surgery can be helpful. Age > 45 years, adiposity, high alpha angle, CE angle < 25° and female sex are risk factors that lead to worse outcome in patients with risk factors and osteoarthritis Tönnis grade 1, the success rate of joint-preserving surgery after 5 years is below 50%. Therefore, we recommend non-surgical treatment. Promising is the use of mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs), even if their routine use has not been established. If conservative therapy is not successful, THR is indicated. With the use of modern bearings, a survival rate of THR of more than 90% after 15 years is reported in patients < 50 years. Patient satisfaction after THR is higher than after joint-preserving surgery.The combination of treatment modalities like joint-preserving surgery in combination with the application of MPCs to both correct the mechanical conflict and also influence progression of osteoarthritis is promising the from a biological point of view.

Asociación entre la dependencia funcional, capacidad funcional y dolor, en personas mayores con artrosis severa de cadera / Association between functional dependence, functional capacity, and pain in older people with severe osteoarthritis of the hip

Antecedentes y objetivo: Determinar si existe asociación entre dependencia funcional, capacidad funcional e intensidad del dolor en personas mayores con artrosis de cadera. Materiales y métodos: Estudio transversal-analítico con reclutamiento consecutivo de 85 individuos. Se evaluó dependencia funcional (índice de Barthel), capacidad funcional (WOMAC) y dolor (escala numérica del dolor). Se determinaron diferencias en capacidad funcional y dolor, según la condición de dependencia funcional. Además, se analizó la correlación entre estas variables. Todos los análisis consideraron un nivel de significación de p<0,05. Resultados: Ochenta y cinco participantes (72,26±5,69 años de edad; 54,12% mujeres) fueron incluidos en el estudio. Los promedios para el índice de Barthel, WOMAC e intensidad del dolor fueron 94,00±9,35; 44,49±17,08 y 6,09±3,12 respectivamente. Del total de participantes 46 fueron clasificados como independientes. El análisis demostró que los participantes clasificados como dependientes presentaron un mayor puntaje en WOMAC-total (p=0,001), WOMAC-dolor (p=0,037), WOMAC-función (p<0,001) y dolor (p=0,010), con tamaños de efecto entre medio y grande. No se encontró diferencias en WOMAC-rigidez (p=0,184). Se encontró una correlación inversa, moderada y significativa entre los puntajes de WOMAC-total (p<0,001), WOMAC-dolor (p=0,007), WOMAC-función (p<0,001) e intensidad del dolor (p=0,002) con el puntaje de dependencia funcional de Barthel, pero no con WOMAC-rigidez (p=0,141). Conclusiones: Los individuos con artrosis de cadera avanzada dependientes funcionalmente tienen una capacidad funcional menor y una intensidad del dolor mayor que los clasificados como independientes. Esta información provee un insumo valioso para clínicos y para la planificación de estrategias de salud.

Background and aim: To determine the association between functional dependence, functional capacity, and pain intensity in older adults with hip osteoarthritis. Methods: Cross-sectional study with a consecutive sampling of 85 participants. Functional dependence (Barthel Index), functional capacity (WOMAC questionnaire), and pain (Numerical Rating Scale) were measured. Differences between functional capacity and pain, depending on functional dependence status were determined. Moreover, correlation analyses were performed between these outcomes. All analyses considered a significance level of p<.05. Results: 85 participants (72.26±5.69 years old; 54.12% women) were included. Mean values for Barthel Index, WOMAC, and pain intensity were 94.00±9.35; 44.49±17.08 and 6.09±3.12, respectively. Of the total participants, 46 were classified as independent. The analysis showed that participants classified as dependent exhibited a higher score in WOMAC-total (p=.001), WOMAC-pain (p=.037), WOMAC-function (p<.001), and pain intensity (p=.01), with medium to high effect sizes. No differences were seen in WOMAC-stiffness (p=.184). An inversed, moderate correlation between the Barthel Index and WOMAC-total (p<.001), WOMAC-pain (p=.007), WOMAC-function (p<.001) and pain intensity (p=.002) were seen, but not in WOMAC-stiffness (p = .141). Conclusion: Functionally dependent older adults with advanced hip osteoarthritis have lower functional capacity and higher pain intensity than those classified as functionally independent. This information provides a valuable insight for clinicians to plan future health strategies.

Obesity, preoperative weight loss, and telemedicine before total joint arthroplasty: a review.

The preoperative period prior to elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a critical time for lifestyle interventions since a scheduled surgery may help motivate patients to lose weight. Weight loss may reduce complications associated with obesity following TJA and enable patients with severe obesity (body mass index [BMI] > 40 kg/m2) to become eligible for TJA, as many institutions use a 40 kg/m2 cut-off for offering surgery. A comprehensive review was conducted to (1) provide background on complications associated with obesity following TJA, (2) synthesize prior research on the success rate of patients losing weight after being denied TJA for severe obesity, (3) discuss bariatric surgery before TJA, and (4) propose mobile health telemedicine weight loss interventions as potential weight loss methods for patients preoperatively. It is well established that obesity increases complications associated with TJA. In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), obesity increases operative time, length of stay, and hospitalization costs as well as the risk of deep infection, revision, and component malpositioning. Obesity may have an even larger impact on complications associated with total hip arthroplasty (THA), including wound complications and deep infection. Obesity also increases the risk of hip dislocation, aseptic loosening, and venous thromboembolism after THA. Synthesis of the only two studies (n = 417), to our knowledge, that followed patients denied TJA for severe obesity demonstrated that only 7% successfully reduced their BMI below 40 kg/m2 via lifestyle modifications and ultimately underwent TJA. Unfortunately, bariatric surgery may only increase certain post-TKA complications including death, pneumonia, and implant failure, and there is limited research on preoperative weight loss via lifestyle modification. A review of short-term mobile health weight loss interventions that combined personalized counseling with self-monitoring via a smartphone app found about 5 kg of weight loss over 3-6 months. Patients with severe obesity have more weight to lose and may have additional motivation to do so before TJA, so weight loss results may differ by patient population. Research is needed to determine whether preoperative mobile health interventions can help patients become eligible for TJA and produce clinically significant weight loss sufficient to improve postoperative outcomes.

Machine learning identifies factors related to early joint space narrowing in dysplastic and non-dysplastic hips.

OBJECTIVES: To utilise machine learning, unsupervised clustering and multivariate modelling in order to predict severe early joint space narrowing (JSN) from anatomical hip parameters while identifying factors related to joint space width (JSW) in dysplastic and non-dysplastic hips. METHODS: A total of 507 hip CT examinations of patients 20-55 years old were retrospectively examined, and JSW, center-edge (CE) angle, alpha angle, anterior acetabular sector angle (AASA), and neck-shaft angle (NSA) were recorded. Dysplasia and severe JSN were defined with CE angle < 25o and JSW< 2 mm, respectively. A random forest classifier was developed to predict severe JSN based on anatomical and demographical data. Multivariate linear regression and two-step unsupervised clustering were performed to identify factors linked to JSW. RESULTS: In dysplastic hips, lateral or anterior undercoverage alone was not correlated to JSN. AASA (p < 0.005) and CE angle (p < 0.032) were the only factors significantly correlated with JSN in dysplastic hips. In non-dysplastic hips, JSW was inversely correlated to CE angle, AASA, and age and positively correlated to NSA (p < 0.001). A random forest classifier predicted severe JSN (AUC 69.9%, 95%CI 47.9-91.8%). TwoStep cluster modelling identified two distinct patient clusters one with low and one with normal JSW and different anatomical characteristics. CONCLUSION: Machine learning predicted severe JSN and identified population characteristics related to normal and abnormal joint space width. Dysplasia in one plane was found to be insufficient to cause JSN, highlighting the need for hip anatomy assessment on multiple planes. KEY POINTS: • Neither anterior nor lateral acetabular dysplasia was sufficient to independently reduce joint space width in a multivariate linear regression model of dysplastic hips. • A random forest classifier was developed based on measurements and demographic parameters from 507 hip joints, achieving an area under the curve of 69.9% in the external validation set, in predicting severe joint space narrowing based on anatomical hip parameters and age. • Unsupervised TwoStep cluster analysis revealed two distinct population groups, one with low and one with normal joint space width, characterised by differences in hip morphology.

A comparative study on the clinical effects of hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach in lateral decubitus in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis caused by Kaschin-Beck disease and congenital acetabular dysplasia / 中华地方病学杂志

Objective:To compare the clinical effects of hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach (DAA) in lateral decubitus in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis caused by Kaschin-Beck disease and congenital acetabular dysplasia.Methods:The prospective study method was used to select the patients who needed hip arthroplasty in the Fourth Department of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from January 2015 to December 2019. All of them were operated with lateral decubitus DAA. According to the inclusion criteria, they were divided into Kacshin-Beck disease hip osteoarthritis group (group A) and congenital acetabular dysplasia hip osteoarthritis group (group B). Hip Harris score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score were conducted, and hip abduction angle and flexion angle were measured before surgery, 3, 14 days and 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery.Results:Nineteen and twenty-two patients were included in group A and group B, respectively. All patients successfully completed the surgery. There was no significant difference in Harris score between the two groups before surgery, 3, 14 days, and 1, 12 months after surgery ( P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in WOMAC score, VAS score, hip abduction angle and hip flexion angle between the two groups before surgery and each time point after surgery ( P > 0.05). In the same group, there were significant differences in Harris score, WOMAC score, VAS score, hip abduction angle and hip flexion angle at different time points ( P < 0.001). All postoperative indicators were significantly improved compared with those before surgery. Conclusions:There is no significant difference in the clinical effects of hip arthroplasty through lateral decubitus DAA in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis caused by Kaschin-Beck disease and congenital acetabular dysplasia. This surgical method has good therapeutic effect on both types of hip osteoarthritis.

Effects of SuperPATH approach versus posterolateral approach in total hip replacement on inflammatory response, hip function, and quality of life in patients with hip diseases / 中国基层医药

Objective:To investigate the effects of SuperPATH approach versus conventional posterolateral approach in total hip replacement on inflammatory response, hip function, and quality of life in patients with hip diseases. Methods:The clinical data of 140 patients with hip diseases who underwent total hip replacement in Shanxian Central Hospital from March 2017 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into SuperPATH approach ( n = 70) and posterolateral approach ( n = 70) groups. Operation-related indexes, inflammatory response indexes, hip function, quality of life, and pain were compared between the two groups. Results:Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the SuperPATH approach group than in the posterolateral approach group [(105.40 ± 15.11) mL vs. (196.89 ± 24.26) mL, t = 26.74, P < 0.001]. Incision length, postoperative time to getting out of bed, length of hospital stay in the SuperPATH approach group were (6.85 ± 1.42) cm, (2.92 ± 0.28) days, and (6.67 ± 1.36) days, respectively, which were significantly shorter than those in the posterolateral approach group [(13.07 ± 1.89) cm, (8.36 ± 1.45) days, (10.91 ± 1.34) days, t = 19.36, 30.82, 18.58, P < 0.001]. Operative time was significantly longer in the SuperPATH approach group than in the posterolateral approach group [(69.38 ± 8.62) minutes vs. (60.45 ± 7.79) minutes, t = 6.43, P < 0.001). The scores of social role functioning, general health perceptions, vitality, mental health, bodily pain, emotional role functioning, physical functioning, and physical functioning measured 6 months after surgery were significantly higher in the SuperPATH approach group than in the posterolateral approach group ( t = 9.12, 11.80, 11.64, 11.69, 6.45, 11.79, 6.04, 10.74, all P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate measured 3 and 14 days after surgery between the two groups (both P > 0.05). Harris score used for evaluation of hip function 1 month after surgery was significantly higher in the SuperPATH approach group than in the posterolateral approach group [(76.42 ± 4.17) points vs. (69.37 ± 5.11) points, t = 8.94, P < 0.001]. The Visual Analog Scale score 3 days after surgery was significantly lower in the SuperPATH approach group than in the posterolateral approach group [(3.18 ± 0.21) points vs. (4.26 ± 0.29) points, t = 25.23, P < 0.001]. Conclusion:Compared with the conventional posterolateral approach, the SuperPATH approach for total hip arthroplasty takes longer operative time, but it can better reduce early postoperative pain, promote hip function recovery, and improve quality of life.

Comparison of Gait Symmetry and Joint Moments in Unilateral and Bilateral Hip Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Controls.

Patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis show a characteristic gait pattern in which they unload the affected leg and overload the unaffected leg. Information on the gait characteristics of patients with bilateral hip osteoarthritis is very limited. The main purposes of this study were to investigate whether the gait pattern of both legs of patients with bilateral hip osteoarthritis deviates from healthy controls and whether bilateral hip osteoarthritis patients show a more symmetrical joint load compared to unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients. In this prospective study, 26 patients with bilateral hip osteoarthritis, 26 patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis and 26 healthy controls were included. The three groups were matched for gender, age and walking speed. Patients were scheduled for a unilateral total hip arthroplasty on the more affected/more painful side. All participants underwent a three-dimensional gait analysis. Gait kinematics and gait kinetics of patients and controls were compared using Statistical Parametric Mapping. Corrected for speed, the gait kinematics and kinetics of both legs of patients with bilateral hip osteoarthritis differed from healthy controls. Bilateral patients had symmetrical knee joint loading, in contrast to the asymmetrical knee joint loading in unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients. The ipsilateral leg of the bilateral patients could be included in studies in addition to unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients as no differences were found. Although patients with bilateral hip osteoarthritis show more symmetrical frontal plane knee joint moments, a pathological external knee adduction moment in the second half of stance was present in the ipsilateral leg in patients with unilateral and bilateral hip osteoarthritis. The lateral adjustment of the knee adduction moment may initiate or accelerate progression of degenerative changes in the lateral compartment of the knee.

The quality of intervention reporting in trials of therapeutic exercise for hip osteoarthritis: a secondary analysis of a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic exercise is recommended as a core treatment for hip osteoarthritis (HOA). Whilst it is widely accepted that exercise can improve pain and disability, optimal type and dose of exercise are yet to be agreed upon. This may, in part, be attributed to the wide variation and inadequate reporting of interventions within the literature. This study evaluates the quality of intervention reporting among trials of therapeutic exercise in HOA. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were sourced in a systematic review, completed in August 2020. Two raters independently used the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) and Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) to evaluate intervention reporting. Correlations between quality assessment scores and CERT and TIDieR scores evaluated the relationship between internal validity and external applicability. The year of publication was compared to the quality of reporting scores. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs were included in the analysis. On average, studies were awarded 9.43 ± 1.95 out of 12 points for the TIDieR checklist (range 4-12) and 13.57 ± 4.01 out of 19 points for the CERT (range 5-19). Pearson's correlation coefficient suggested that the quality of reporting had improved over time and that there was a fair, positive relationship between internal validity and external applicability. DISCUSSION: Whilst the quality of intervention reporting is improving, many RCTs of therapeutic exercise in HOA lack the detail necessary to allow accurate evaluation and replication. Researchers are encouraged to utilise the standardised reporting guidelines to increase the translation of effective interventions into clinical practice.

Italian physiotherapists' knowledge of and adherence to osteoarthritis clinical practice guidelines: a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to manage musculoskeletal conditions among physiotherapists appears suboptimal. Osteoarthritis is one of the most disabling conditions worldwide and several studies showed a lack of knowledge of and adherence to osteoarthritis CPGs in physiotherapists' clinical practice. However, those studies are not conclusive, as they examine the knowledge of and adherence to CPGs only in isolation, or only by focussing on a single treatment. Thus, analysis of the knowledge of and adherence to CPGs in the same sample would allow for a better understanding of the evidence-to-practice gap, which, if unaddressed, can lead to suboptimal care for these patients. This study aims at assessing Italian physiotherapists' evidence-to-practice gap in osteoarthritis CPGs. METHODS: An online survey divided into two sections investigating knowledge of and adherence to CPGs was developed based on three high-quality, recent and relevant CPGs. In the first section, participants had to express their agreement with 24 CPG statements through a 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree) scale. We defined a ≥ 70% agreement with a statement as consensus. In the second section, participants were shown a clinical case, with different interventions to choose from. Participants were classified as 'Delivering' (all recommended interventions selected), 'Partially Delivering' (some recommended interventions missing) and 'Non-Delivering' (at least one non-recommended interventions selected) the recommended intervention, depending on chosen interventions. RESULTS: 822 physiotherapists (mean age (SD): 35.8 (13.3); female 47%) completed the survey between June and July 2020. In the first section, consensus was achieved for 13/24 statements. In the second section, 25% of the participants were classified as 'Delivering', 22% as 'Partially Delivering' and 53% as 'Non-Delivering'. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed an adequate level of knowledge of osteoarthritis CPGs regarding the importance of exercise and education. However, an adequate level of adherence has yet to be reached, since many physiotherapists did not advise weight reduction, but rest from physical activity, and often included secondary treatments (e.g. manual therapy) supported by low-level evidence. These results identify an evidence-to-practice gap, which may lead to non-evidence based practice behaviours for the management of patients with osteoarthritis.

Supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath) versus mini-incision posterolateral total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath) arthroplasty has been proposed to be minimally invasive and tissue sparing, with possible superior postoperative outcomes compared with conventional approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, previous studies have underlined the shortcomings of conventional THA approaches, including higher dislocation, more blood loss, longer incisions, more tissue damage, and delayed postoperative rehabilitation. In the present study, we compared the short-term outcomes of unilateral THA with those of SuperPath and the mini-incision posterolateral approach (PLA) for hip osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Patients with unilateral hip OA were prospectively recruited and underwent either SuperPath (SuperPath group) or mini-incision PLA THA (PLA group). Perioperative status [operative time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, soft tissue damage, and length of hospital stay (LOS)], and postoperative function outcomes, including range of motion (ROM), pain visual analog scale (VAS), and Harris Hip Score (HHS), were evaluated and compared between the groups at scheduled time points within 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Compared with the PLA group, the SuperPath group yielded a significantly shorter incision length (7.83 vs. 12.45 cm, P<0.001), longer operative time (102.72 vs. 66.22 min, P<0.001), more blood loss (1,007.38 vs. 844.55 mL, P=0.005), and more soft tissue damage (creatine kinase: 1,056.05 vs. 821.50 U/L, P=0.006) on postoperative day 3. The SuperPath group also showed deficient acetabular cup positioning (abduction angle: 36.94° vs. 42.66°, P=0.004) and a greater decrease in ROM (flexion: 107.66° vs. 114.44°, P=0.004; 109.83° vs. 116.11°, P=0.002; 111.66° vs. 118.88°, P<0.001) on postoperative days 1, 3, and 14, as well as severe early-term pain symptoms (pain VAS on postoperative day 3: 7.05 vs. 6.55, P=0.041). However, the LOS, C-reactive protein levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (within 2 weeks postoperatively), and HHS were comparable between the groups during the 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: SuperPath may be a promising, minimally invasive technique for the treatment of OA in the future. Further investigation is necessary to evidence the possible superiority of SuperPath over other conventional mini-incision THA approaches.

[Clinical effects of tranexamic acid in arthroscope for femoroacetabular impingement].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effects of tranexamic acid in arthroscope for femoroacetabular impingement. METHODS: Totally 34 patients (34 hips) with femoroacetabular impingement underwent hip arthroscopy from June 2016 to December 2018, were randomly divided into two groups named as tranexamic acid group and control group, 17 patients in each group. In TXA group, there were 10 males and 7 females, aged from 20 to 49 years old with an average of (32.1±7.6) years old;15 mg/kg TXA was intravenous drops before operation incision performed at 10 min. In control group, there were 11 males and 6 females, aged from 20 to 49 years old with an average of (30.9±6.2) years old;100 ml normal saline was intravenous drops before operation incision performed at 10 min. Introopertaive and total bloodloss between two groups were compared. Visual analogue scale (VAS) at 3 and 7 days after opertaion were used to evaluate pain relief of hip joint. Modified Harris Hip Score(mHHS) of hip joint at 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks after oeprtaion were applied to evaluate clinical effects. RESULTS: All patients were obtained follow up over 12 weeks. Incision healed well without infection and deep vein thrombosis. There were no statistical difference in opertaion time bewteen two groups(P>0.05) . Total blood loss and introopertaive blood loss in TXA group were (0.47±0.20) L and (0.18±0.08) L, while (0.66±0.22) L and (0.24±0.01) L in control group;there were statical differences between two groups (P<0.05). There were no dierences in VAS before opertaion and 7 days after opertaion between two groups (P>0.05);VAS at 3 days after opertaion in TXA group was 2.35±1.12 and 3.12±0.70 in control group, and had difference (P< 0.05). There were significance in VAS at 3 and 7 days after opertaion compared with preopertaive between two groups (P< 0.05). Postopertaive mHHS in TXA group at 3 and 6 weeks were 87.72±1.95 and 91.92±2.32, respectively;while 84.08±1.21 and 89.77±3.30 in control group;there were difference between two groups at 3 and 6 weeks after operation (P<0.05);there were no significant difference in mHHS between two groups at 9 and 12 weeks after operation(P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Preoperative application of tranexamic acid could effectively reduce blood loss in arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement, thereby improving surgical field of vision, reducing difficulty of surgical operation, which could promote early and rapid rehabilitation of hip function.

The effects of periacetabular osteotomy in the treatment of borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip / 中华骨科杂志

Objective:To investigate the effects of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) in treating borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).Methods:The patients with borderline DDH [lateral center-edge angle (LCEA): 18°-25°) who received PAO with follow-up duration for more than 2 years from January 2011 to January 2018 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients in the control group were matched on a 1∶2 ratio based on gender, age, body mass index (BMI) and follow-up duration. There were 66 patients in the 0°≤LCEA<10° group and 66 patients in the 10°≤LCEA<18° group. The LCEA, anterior center-edge angle (ACEA), T?nnis angle, femoral head extrusion index, femoro-epiphyseal acetabular roof (FEAR) index, femoral anteversion angle, West Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) index and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) were compared among the three groups before operation and the last follow-up.Results:In the preoperative 18°≤LCEA<25° group, three of 33 patients (9.1%) had LCEA, because the only imaging feature suggested acetabular dysplasia, while other parameters were evaluated within the normal range. There were 17 patients with ACEA <20° (51.5%), 24 patients (72.7%) with T?nnis angle >10°, 12 patients (36.4%) with ACEA <20° and T?nnis angle >10°. The positive rate of posterior wall signs in the 18°≤LCEA<25° group (72.7%) was lower than that in the 10°≤LCEA<18° group (77.3%) and the 0°≤LCEA<10° group (90.9%) with statistically significant difference (χ 2=6.417, P=0.040) at preoperation. The positive rate of cross sign (27.3%) and ischial spine sign (48.5%) in the 18°≤LCEA<25° group were higher than those in the 10°≤LCEA<18° group (10.6% and 18.2%, respectively, χ 2=7.002, P=0.030) and the 0°≤LCEA<10° groups (9.1% and 13.6%, respectively, χ 2=16.497, P<0.001). The FEAR index in the 18°≤LCEA<25° group (3.7±8.0) lower than that in the 10°≤LCEA<18° group (4.3±7.9) and the 0°≤LCEA<10° group (11.0±8.8) with significant difference ( F=12.703, P<0.001). In the 18°≤LCEA<25° group, postoperative LCEA increased from 20.4°±1.8° to 37.8°±7.1°, ACEA increased from 18.3°±7.8° to 36.3°±6.3°. T?nnis angle decreased from 12.7°±6.2° to -5.6°±9.2°, the femoral head extrusion index decreased from 22.9%±6.7% to 10.7%±12.2%, the WOMAC index decreased from 20.1±13.4 to 6.0±6.3, and the iHOT-12 score increased from 50.2±19.9 to 90.0±13.7. The above difference before and after surgery was statistically significant ( P<0.05). At the last follow-up, the WOMAC score in the 18°≤LCEA<25° group was 6.0±6.3, wich was less than 10°≤LCEA<18° group (9.3±9.6) and 0°≤LCEA<10° group (12.0±16.0) ( F=6.515, P=0.002). The iHOT-12 score in the 18°≤LCEA<25° group was 90.0±13.7, which was greater than 10°≤LCEA<18° group (77.7±17.3) and 0°≤LCEA<10° group (78.1±20.5) ( F=15.833, P<0.001). Conclusion:After 2 years follow-up, PAO significantly improved bone coverage of femoral head and hip function in patients with borderline DDH. Before surgery, we should pay attention to the comprehensive evaluation of different radiological parameters of the acetabulum, to make better preoperative planning.