Recomendaciones de consenso para el tratamiento de la prevención de la migraña / Consensus recommendations for the treatment of migraine prevention

Objetivo los objetivos son conocer la opinión de neurólogos y farmacéuticos hospitalarios sobre aquellos aspectos aún en el debate respecto al papel de los anticuerpos monoclonales anti-CGRP en el tratamiento preventivo de la migraña. Identificar aquellas controversias aún existentes. Proponer recomendaciones consensuadas de mejora asistencial. Y promover el acceso de los clínicos y los pacientes a estos nuevos tratamientos en la prevención de la migraña con fármacos biológicos, a fin de mejorar la atención y seguimiento del paciente. Métodos se identificaron y valoraron recomendaciones para la utilización de fármacos biológicos en la prevención de la migraña a través de la metodología de consenso Delphi, proponiendo 88 aseveraciones agrupadas en 3 temas: un módulo de clínica que trata sobre el manejo de los tratamientos biológicos en la migraña, un módulo de pacientes que trata sobre las estrategias de educación al paciente y mejora de la adhesión y un módulo de coordinación que incluye las aseveraciones relacionadas con las estrategias para mejorar el trabajo conjunto entre los 2 colectivos. Se empleó la escala ordinal de Likert de 9 puntos para puntuar dichas recomendaciones y, posteriormente, los datos se analizaron estadísticamente a través de diferentes métricas. Resultados tras las 2 rondas de consulta, se alcanzó consenso en el acuerdo en 71 aseveraciones (80,7%) y consenso en el desacuerdo en una de ellas (1,1%), quedando como indeterminadas 16 aseveraciones (18,2%) de las 88 debatidas. Conclusiones el alto grado de consenso indica que la opinión de neurólogos y farmacéuticos hospitalarios sobre el papel de los anticuerpos monoclonales anti-CGRP en el tratamiento de la migraña es muy similar y permite identificar aquellas controversias aún existentes, para mejorar la atención y seguimiento del paciente con migraña. (AU)

Objective The objectives are to know the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on those aspects still under debate regarding the role of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine. To identify those controversies that still exist. To propose agreed recommendations for improvement of care. And to promote access of clinicians and patients to these new treatments in the prevention of migraine with biological drugs, in order to improve patient care and follow-up. Methodology Recommendations for the use of biological drugs in the prevention of migraine were identified and evaluated through the Delphi consensus methodology, proposing 88 statements grouped into three themes: a clinical module that deals with the management of biological treatments in migraine; a patient module that discusses patient education and adherence improvement strategies; and a coordination module that includes statements related to strategies to improve joint work between the two groups. The 9-point Likert ordinal scale was used to score these recommendations and, subsequently, the data was statistically analyzed through different metrics. Results After both rounds of voting, consensus was reached in agreement on 71 of the 88 statements (80.7%), leaving one statement (1.1%) with consensus in disagreement and 16 remaining as indeterminate (18.2%). Conclusions The high degree of consensus indicates that the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on the role of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of migraine is very similar and allows identifying those controversies that still exist, to improve the care and follow-up of patients with migraine. (AU)

[Translated article] Consensus recommendations on the preventive treatment of migraine.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives are to know the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on those aspects still under debate regarding the role of anti-Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine. To identify those controversies that still exist. To propose agreed recommendations for improvement of care. And to promote access of clinicians and patients to these new treatments in the prevention of migraine with biological drugs, in order to improve patient care and follow-up. METHODOLOGY: Recommendations for the use of biological drugs in the prevention of migraine were identified and evaluated through the Delphi consensus methodology, proposing 88 statements grouped into 3 themes: a clinical module that deals with the management of biological treatments in migraine; a patient module that discusses patient education and adherence improvement strategies; and a coordination module that includes statements related to strategies to improve joint work between the two groups. The 9-point Likert ordinal scale was used to score these recommendations and, subsequently, the data was statistically analysed through different metrics. RESULTS: After both rounds of voting, consensus was reached in agreement on 71 of the 88 statements (80.7%), leaving 1 statement (1.1%) with consensus in disagreement and 16 remaining as indeterminate (18.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The high degree of consensus indicates that the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on the role of anti-Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine is very similar and allows identifying those controversies that still exist, to improve the care and follow-up of patients with migraine.

Consensus recommendations for the treatment of migraine prevention. / Recomendaciones de consenso para el tratamiento de la prevención de la migraña.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives are to know the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on those aspects still under debate regarding the role of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine. To identify those controversies that still exist. To propose agreed recommendations for improvement of care. And to promote access of clinicians and patients to these new treatments in the prevention of migraine with biological drugs, in order to improve patient care and follow-up. METHODOLOGY: Recommendations for the use of biological drugs in the prevention of migraine were identified and evaluated through the Delphi consensus methodology, proposing 88 statements grouped into three themes: a clinical module that deals with the management of biological treatments in migraine; a patient module that discusses patient education and adherence improvement strategies; and a coordination module that includes statements related to strategies to improve joint work between the two groups. The 9-point Likert ordinal scale was used to score these recommendations and, subsequently, the data was statistically analyzed through different metrics. RESULTS: After both rounds of voting, consensus was reached in agreement on 71 of the 88 statements (80.7%), leaving one statement (1.1%) with consensus in disagreement and 16 remaining as indeterminate (18.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The high degree of consensus indicates that the opinion of neurologists and hospital pharmacists on the role of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of migraine is very similar and allows identifying those controversies that still exist, to improve the care and follow-up of patients with migraine.

Efectividad de anticuerpos monoclonales anti-PRGC en el tratamiento preventivo de la migraña: estudio prospectivo de 63 pacientes / Effectiveness of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine: A prospective study of 63 patients

Introducción: El péptido relacionado con el gen de la calcitonina (PRGC) ha supuesto una revolución en el conocimiento de la fisiopatología de la migraña y ha llevado al desarrollo de nuevos fármacos específicos contra esta nueva diana.MétodosPresentamos un estudio prospectivo de 63 pacientes con migraña episódica (ME) y crónica (MC) tratados con anticuerpos monoclonales anti-PRGC y describimos su eficacia, seguridad y recaídas tras su suspensión. Se analizan predictores de respuesta que puedan ayudar a planificar mejor los tratamientos.ResultadosLa edad media fue de 48,3 ± 11,81 años, siendo 84,1% mujeres. La media de días de migraña al mes (DMM) fue de 15,59 días; 63,5% tenían MC. En todos se comenzó con erenumab 70 mg subcutáneo. Se aumentó la dosis a 140 mg en 47,6% de los pacientes. Se obtuvo una reducción entre 49,85 y 59,53% de DMM entre los tres primeros meses y el año de tratamiento; 17,5% presentó estreñimiento y 4,8% reacción en el lugar de la inyección. En cinco pacientes (17,9%) se cambió el tratamiento a galcanezumab. Tras suspender el tratamiento 23 pacientes sufrieron recaídas, con buena respuesta al reintroducirlo. No hemos podido establecer predictores de respuesta, pero sí observamos de forma estadísticamente significativa mayor número de días de mejora cuantos más DMM hubiera al inicio (p = 0,002).ConclusionesLos anticuerpos monoclonales anti-PRGC son fármacos eficaces, seguros y bien tolerados. Observamos que su interrupción, en algunos casos, puede conllevar recaídas frecuentes y precoces, por lo que recomendamos prolongar el tratamiento en aquellos pacientes con mayor DMM. (AU)

Introduction: Calcitonine Gen-Related Peptide (CGRP) established a revolution in migraine pathophysiology knowledge and has led to the development of new drugs specifically targeting this disease.MethodsWe present a prospective study in which 63 episodic and chronic migraine patients have been treated with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies describing their efficacy, security and relapses after their interruption. Response predictors have been analyzed such they can help us to create a better treatment plan.ResultsAverage age was 48.3 ± 11.81 years old, 84.1% of them being women. The average was of 15.59 migraine days per month (MDM). 63.5% of all patients suffered chronic migraine. The initial dose of Erenumab in all patient was 70 mg subcutaneous. This was increased to 140 mg in 47.6% of the patients. An MDM reduction between 49.85% and 59.53% was obtained within three to twelve months from the start of treatment. Constipation was present in 17.5% of the patients and 4.8% suffered injection site reaction. The treatment was changed to Galcanezumab in 17.9% of the patients. After interrupting the treatment, 23 patients relapsed with a good response on reintroduction of the treatment. It was not possible to establish a clear response predictor, however a statistically significant increase in the number of days of improvement was observed with more MDM at baseline level (p = 0.002).ConclusionsAnti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are effective, safe, and well tolerated drugs. We have observed that their discontinuation, in some cases can lead to frequent and early relapses so we strongly recommend to extend the treatment in those patients with a higher MDM. (AU)

Distribution of calcitonin gene-related peptide and vascular endothelial growth factor in the mouse lung at the embryonic and postnatal stages / Distribución del péptido relacionado con el gen de la calcitonina y el factor de crecimiento endotelial vascular en el pulmón de ratón en las etapas embrionaria y posnatal

SUMMARY: Neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a neurotransmitter related to vasculogenesis during organ development. The vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) is also required for vascular patterning during lung morphogenesis. CGRP is primarily found in organs and initially appears in pulmonary neuroendocrine cells during the early embryonic stage of lung development. However, the relationship between CGRP and VEGF-A during lung formation remains unclear. This study investigates CGRP and VEGF-A mRNA expressions in the embryonic, pseudoglandular, canalicular, saccular, and alveolar stages of lung development from embryonic day 12.5 (E12.5) to postnatal day 5 (P5) through quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and in situ hybridization. Further, we analyzed the expression of CGRP via immunohistochemistry. The VEGF-A mRNA was mainly scattered across the whole lung body from E12.5. CGRP was found to be expressed in a few epithelial cells of the canalicular and the respiratory bronchiole of the lung from E12.5 to P5. An antisense probe for CGRP mRNA was strongly detected in the lung from E14.5 to E17.5. Endogenous CGRP may regulate the development of the embryonic alveoli from E14.5 to E17.5 in a temporal manner.

El péptido relacionado con el gen de la calcitonina (CGRP) es un neurotransmisor vinculado con la vasculogénesis durante el desarrollo de órganos. El factor de crecimiento endotelial vascular A (VEGF-A) también se requiere para el patrón vascular durante la morfogénesis pulmonar. El CGRP se encuentra principalmente en los órganos y aparece inicialmente en las células neuroendocrinas pulmonares durante la etapa embrionaria temprana del desarrollo pulmonar. Sin embargo, la relación entre CGRP y VEGF-A durante la formación de los pulmones sigue sin estar clara. Este estudio investiga las expresiones de ARNm de CGRP y VEGF-A en las etapas embrionaria, pseudoglandular, canalicular, sacular y alveolar del desarrollo pulmonar desde el día embrionario 12,5 (E12,5) hasta el día postnatal 5 (P5) a través de la reacción en cadena de la polimerasa cuantitativa en tiempo real. (qRT-PCR) e hibridación in situ. Además, analizamos la expresión de CGRP mediante inmunohistoquímica. El ARNm de VEGF-A se dispersó principalmente por todo parénquima pulmonar desde E12,5. Se encontró que CGRP se expresaba en unas pocas células epiteliales de los bronquiolos canaliculares y respiratorios del pulmón desde E12,5 a P5. Se detectó fuertemente una sonda antisentido para ARNm de CGRP en el pulmón de E14,5 a E17,5. El CGRP endógeno puede regular el desarrollo de los alvéolos embrionarios de E14,5 a E17,5 de manera temporal.

[Effectiveness of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine: A prospective study of 63 patients]. / Efectividad de anticuerpos monoclonales anti-PRGC en el tratamiento preventivo de la migraña: estudio prospectivo de 63 pacientes.

INTRODUCTION: Calcitonine Gen-Related Peptide (CGRP) established a revolution in migraine pathophysiology knowledge and has led to the development of new drugs specifically targeting this disease. METHODS: We present a prospective study in which 63 episodic and chronic migraine patients have been treated with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies describing their efficacy, security and relapses after their interruption. Response predictors have been analyzed such they can help us to create a better treatment plan. RESULTS: Average age was 48.3 ± 11.81 years old, 84.1% of them being women. The average was of 15.59 migraine days per month (MDM). 63.5% of all patients suffered chronic migraine. The initial dose of Erenumab in all patient was 70 mg subcutaneous. This was increased to 140 mg in 47.6% of the patients. An MDM reduction between 49.85% and 59.53% was obtained within three to twelve months from the start of treatment. Constipation was present in 17.5% of the patients and 4.8% suffered injection site reaction. The treatment was changed to Galcanezumab in 17.9% of the patients. After interrupting the treatment, 23 patients relapsed with a good response on reintroduction of the treatment. It was not possible to establish a clear response predictor, however a statistically significant increase in the number of days of improvement was observed with more MDM at baseline level (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are effective, safe, and well tolerated drugs. We have observed that their discontinuation, in some cases can lead to frequent and early relapses so we strongly recommend to extend the treatment in those patients with a higher MDM.

Tratamiento preventivo en migraña: anticuerpos monoclonales contra la vía del péptido relacionado con el gen de la calcitonina / Migraine preventive treatment: monoclonal antibodies against calcitonine gene related peptide

Resumen La migraña es un trastorno muy prevalente que afecta a alrededor del 15% de los sujetos adultos. Es clasificada por la Organización Mundial de la Saludentre los primeros puestos como causa de discapacidad. Los tratamientos preventivos habituales hasta ahora derivan de otras indicaciones y por serendipia se utilizan en prevención de migraña: betabloqueantes, drogas antiepilépticas, antidepresivos tricíclicos, bloquean tes de canales de calcio, toxina botulínica. Todas ellas han mostrado eficacia similar al 50% en reducir el número de episodios migrañosos pese a efectos secundarios indeseados. Durante los últimos años, se ha evaluado la eficacia y seguridad de los anticuerpos monoclonales (AM) que actúan sobre la vía del péptido relacionado con el gen de la calcitonina (CGRP) en migraña. Dicho péptido es relevante en la activación del dolor en territorio meníngeoy es mediado por terminales nerviosas trigeminales una vez activado el proceso migrañoso. Su dosaje en crisis migrañosas ha sido elevado en diversos estudios y su neutralización/bloqueo, redunda en alivio del dolor. Los anticuerpos monoclonales erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, eptinezumab aprobados en el mercado EE.UU./Europa desde 2018 y tras varios trabajos de Fase III y abiertos de extensión, mostraron clara seguridad yeficacia y están presentes en nuestro medio desde mediados de 2019. Desarrollamos la racionalidad e indicaciones de uso de los mismos.

Abstract Migraine is a very prevalent disorder that is estimated to affect about 10-15% of adult subjects. Ac cording to the World Health Organization migraine is one of the first causes of disability. Traditional preventive treatments discovered by serendipity include Beta blockers, antinconvulsants drugs, calcium channel blockers, tricyclic antidepressants and onabotulinum A and offer about 50% efficacy after controlled placebo trials and real life use. Because of lack of adherence and adverse events, there is a loss of beneficial sustain on these treat ments. Recently, the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies (MA) that act on the peptide pathway related to the calcitonin gene (CGRP) has been evaluated in migraine, being the first specific tailored treatment on one of the multiple targets on migraine. This family of drugs: erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab, eptinezumab, finished Fase III, extensions trials and many of them are in the market approved since 2018.Since 2019 are available in Argentina. We will describe the rationale for the prescription of this family of new drugs for migraine.

Fisiopatología de la migraña: Teoría vascular, ¿Cierta o no? / Pathophysiology of migraine: vascular theory, true or not?

La migraña es una enfermedad de alta prevalencia, incapacitante y en algunas ocasiones de difícil manejo. Desde hace décadas se han planteado múltiples teorías para explicar su curso, su componente genético y la asociación a distintos factores de riesgo. Actualmente se desconoce una fisiopatología única y exacta que implique los eventos, y se ha encontrado fuerte evidencia que muestra que la teoría más antigua y con mayor sustento, a saber la teoría vascular, es en realidad incorrecta, pues no explica la totalidad de los eventos. Sin embargo, se han probado distintos mecanismos que, en conjunto, permiten comprender las alteraciones presentes. Entre estas se cuentan cambios estructurales, implicación de neuropéptidos, sensibilización, e inflamación neurogénica.

Migraine is a highly prevalent disease; it is disabling, and sometimes difficult to manage. For decades, many theories have been proposed to explain its course, its association with a genetic component and with different risk factors. There is currently no single and exact pathophysiology that accounts for all events, and strong evidence has been showing that the oldest theory believed to be mostly true, i.e. the vascular theory, is actually incorrect, because it does not explain the totality of the events. However, various mechanisms have been proven to exist, which together, provide insight into alterations, such as structural changes involving neuropeptides, sensitization, and neurogenic inflammation.