A practical workflow for forensic species identification using direct sequencing of real-time PCR products.

BACKGROUND: Forensic scientists are often required to identify species of unknown biological samples. Although methods based on sequencing of DNA barcode regions are the gold standard for species identification in single-source forensic samples, they are cumbersome to implement as routine work in forensic laboratories that perform many tests, including human DNA typing. We have developed a species identification workflow that incorporates direct sequencing with real-time PCR products (real-time PCR-direct sequencing) as the technical trick for easy testing in forensic practice. METHOD AND RESULTS: Following our workflow, DNA samples from vertebrates, such as mammals, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and fish, were subjected to species identification using vertebrate universal primers targeting each of the four DNA barcode regions. In real-time PCR melting curve analysis, humans and animals (nonhuman) could be differentiated by comparing melting temperatures, and subsequent real-time PCR-direct sequencing contributed to simplified sequencing. Searches against public DNA databases using the obtained sequences were compatible with the origin of the samples, indicating that this method might be used to identify animal species at the genus level. Furthermore, this workflow was effective in actual casework, which provided rapid test results according to the needs of the investigating agencies. CONCLUSIONS: The species identification workflow will simply sequence as much as possible and can be integrated into routine forensic practice. The real-time PCR-direct sequencing used in this workflow might be beneficial not only for species identification but also for DNA sequencing by using the Sanger method for a variety of life sciences.

Six Years' Experience Performing ABO Genotyping by PCR-direct Sequencing / 대한수혈학회지

BACKGROUND: ABO genotyping is essential for resolving ABO grouping discrepancy and for determinating ABO subgroups. Most clinical samples, including suspected inherited subgroups and acquired variant phenotypes, can be determined by PCR-sequencing of exons 6 and 7 in the ABO gene. Here, we describe our six years' experience performing ABO genotyping by PCR-direct sequencing. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective investigation of serological and genotypical data from 205 samples (158 patients and 47 of their family members) of patients who were referred to the Molecular Genetics Laboratory at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital for ABO genotyping between January 2007 and July 2012. ABO genotyping was performed on all samples with PCR-direct sequencing of exons 6 and 7 in the ABO gene; the standard serologic tests were also performed. RESULTS: The frequency of phenotypes consistent with their genotypes was 70.8% (112/158 cases) and the A2B3 phenotype with the cis-AB01 allele was the most common (31.0%, 49 cases) among them. The frequency of phenotypes inconsistent with their genotypes was 29.1% (46/158 cases) and the A1B3 phenotype was the most frequently recovered case (5.1%, 8 cases). Family study showed differential phenotype expression depending on the co-inherited ABO allele in five families with the B306, cis-AB01, Ael02, Aw14, or B305 allele and also showed a typical inheritance of a chimera with A102/B101/O04. CONCLUSION: We propose that ABO genotyping using PCR-direct sequencing is useful for the resolution of ABO discrepancies and for the investigation of ABO subgroups based on six years' experience. In addition, family study for analysis of phenotypic patterns of ABO subgroups is also crucial to ABO genotyping.

Six Years' Experience Performing ABO Genotyping by PCR-direct Sequencing / 대한수혈학회지

BACKGROUND: ABO genotyping is essential for resolving ABO grouping discrepancy and for determinating ABO subgroups. Most clinical samples, including suspected inherited subgroups and acquired variant phenotypes, can be determined by PCR-sequencing of exons 6 and 7 in the ABO gene. Here, we describe our six years' experience performing ABO genotyping by PCR-direct sequencing. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective investigation of serological and genotypical data from 205 samples (158 patients and 47 of their family members) of patients who were referred to the Molecular Genetics Laboratory at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital for ABO genotyping between January 2007 and July 2012. ABO genotyping was performed on all samples with PCR-direct sequencing of exons 6 and 7 in the ABO gene; the standard serologic tests were also performed. RESULTS: The frequency of phenotypes consistent with their genotypes was 70.8% (112/158 cases) and the A2B3 phenotype with the cis-AB01 allele was the most common (31.0%, 49 cases) among them. The frequency of phenotypes inconsistent with their genotypes was 29.1% (46/158 cases) and the A1B3 phenotype was the most frequently recovered case (5.1%, 8 cases). Family study showed differential phenotype expression depending on the co-inherited ABO allele in five families with the B306, cis-AB01, Ael02, Aw14, or B305 allele and also showed a typical inheritance of a chimera with A102/B101/O04. CONCLUSION: We propose that ABO genotyping using PCR-direct sequencing is useful for the resolution of ABO discrepancies and for the investigation of ABO subgroups based on six years' experience. In addition, family study for analysis of phenotypic patterns of ABO subgroups is also crucial to ABO genotyping.