Patient information leaflets and package inserts of ibuprofen provided in the UK and Thailand: a comparative assessment.

OBJECTIVES: Written medicine information (WMI) is important for ensuring patients understand and use their medicines optimally, but relatively little research has assessed the quality of available WMI. This study assessed the quality of WMI using a sample of leaflets for ibuprofen in the UK and Thailand. METHODS: Leaflets were obtained by purchasing a product from retail outlets or community pharmacies, 18 from each country. In the UK, these were patient information leaflets (PILs); in Thailand, they were package inserts PIs not specifically designed for patients. Leaflets were assessed for content, layout, and readability using standard methods and compared to relevant guidelines. KEY FINDINGS: The UK PILs were uniform and conformed to EU regulatory requirements for content, whereas Thai PIs varied considerably, many failing to include important information required by Thai regulations. Several forms of Thai PIs were found, including some very short leaflets, containing minimal information. The readability of both was rated as poor, all used small font size and had less than desirable white space. Fewer Thai PIs than UK PILs met the Keystone Criteria for ibuprofen. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of variation in format and content of Thai WMI could potentially cause confusion and reduce willingness to read it. PILs, conforming to Thai regulatory guidelines, should be provided with medicines instead. Leaflets in both countries would benefit from improved readability and layout.

A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Knowledge of Medicine Safety and Frequency of Reading Medication Leaflets and Its Predictors - Insights from Saudi Adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Background and Aim: On the other hand, patient safety, is of the utmost importance, in addition to health care providers' counseling and advice, patient information leaflets (PILs) also have a significant impact on health outcomes. This study aimed to assess the Knowledge of medicine safety and Frequency of reading medication Leaflets and their predictors among the Saudi population in Riyadh Saudi Arabia. Methods and Materials: This cross-sectional study was conducted over three months in 2023 using online structured self-administered questionnaires, on the adults of Saudi Arabia, admitted to provide informed consent, aged ≥18 years, able to complete the questionnaires, being Saudi nationals, and currently living in the country. The data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 27. Results: In this study, 23.6% (n=123) of respondents always read the PILs, while 14.6% (n=76) of them never read the PILs. In addition, 22.6% (n=118) of them find it difficult to understand the PILs. In this study, 53.9% of them revealed that ADRs are unexpected reactions after taking the normal dose and 15.4% of them do not know what ADRs are. The respondents gender (B= 0.164; SE=0.075; 95CI = 0.017-0.310; p = 0.029), Social status (B = 0.251; SE = 0.079; 95CI = 0.096-0.406; p = 0.002) and monthly income (B= 0.136; SE = 0.021; 95CI = 0.095-0.178; p < 0.001) was the predictor of reading PILs. Conclusion: In this study, two-thirds of participants took medication and knew why they were taking it. However, only a few of them took the medicine after seeing a doctor, suggesting self-medication practice. In addition, 22.1% of them find it difficult to understand the PILS, and a small number of them would rather read it. Highlighting the significance of seeking medical advice from healthcare professionals before using a medication.

Investigation on the accumulation of background and pregnancy outcome information on cases consulted by the Japan Drug Information Institute in Pregnancy.

Since pregnant women are excluded from clinical trials, it is essential to accumulate post-marketing information to evaluate the effects on the fetus of medication use during pregnancy. The Japan Drug Information Institute in Pregnancy (JDIIP) was established at the National Center for Child Health and Development as a Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare project to provide patients with information and conduct follow-up surveys. In this study, we investigated the status of the accumulation of JDIIP consultation cases to identify issues for enhancing clinical information appropriate for use during pregnancy and to examine how information should be collected and provided. In addition, the status of descriptions of Japanese package inserts, which are representative of those used by healthcare professionals as a source of information, was confirmed for medications used by JDIIP consultation cases. The characteristics of the JDIIP consultation cases information were that the contents that needed to be adjusted when evaluating the effects on the fetus of medication use during pregnancy were obtained. In addition, the follow-up rate was 83.1%. However, although the number of consultation facilities has increased, the number of consultations has not, indicating the need to further increase the number. It was found that there is limited information on epidemiological studies of clinical use in Japanese package inserts. To improve clinical information on the appropriate use of medications during pregnancy, it is necessary to accumulate more information in the future, and it is considered necessary to consider new approaches utilizing the JDIIP system.

Impacto de la adición de pictogramas farmacéuticos como ayuda visual sobre la comprensión de prospectos en estudiantes de educación secundaria / Impact of the addition of pharmaceutical pictograms as visual aids on the comprehension of package inserts in students completing secondary education

Introducción: La Atención Farmacéutica requiere que los pacientes comprendan la información brindada. La inclusión de ayudas visuales podría mejorar la comprensión de textos complejos como son los prospectos de los medicamentos. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar los efectos de la inclusión de pictogramas farmacéuticos sobre la comprensión de instrucciones elementales para el uso de medicamentos por estudiantes que finalizan la enseñanza básica. Método: De un total de 309 alumnos participantes, se aleatorizaron 160 para leer tres prospectos de medicamentos de uso frecuente (ibuprofeno, amoxicilina/ácido clavulánico y omeprazol), mientras que 149 recibieron pictogramas junto a los prospectos. La aleatorización fue alterna según la posición de los alumnos en el aula. La comprensión fue estimada mediante cuestiones básicas del uso de medicamentos. Resultados: En el grupo control solo el 38.75% de los alumnos contestaron correctamente cuándo tomar el ibuprofeno en relación a las comidas el 32.25% acertaron cual es la dosis habitual del antibiótico y el 61.88% identificó la indicación del omeprazol. En los tres casos, se encontraron diferencias significativas en favor de la comprensión en el grupo experimental (OR = 1.93; 95% IC, 1.23 – 3.05; p = 0.0041, OR = 3.87; 95% IC, 2.43 – 6.25; p = 10-7 y OR = 3.55; 95% IC, 2.07 – 6.29; p = 3.67x10-5 respectivamente). Conclusiones: La inclusión de pictogramas farmacéuticos en los prospectos es una estrategia sencilla que podría potencialmente favorecer el uso racional del medicamento. (AU)

Introduction: Pharmaceutical Care requires that patients understand the information provided. The inclusion of visual aids could improve the comprehension of complex texts such as drug package inserts. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of the inclusion of pharmaceutical pictograms on the comprehension of elementary instructions for the use of drugs by students completing basic education. Methods: Among a total of 309 participating students, 160 were randomized to read three frequently used drug package inserts (ibuprofen, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and omeprazole), while 149 received pictographs together with the package inserts. Randomization was alternated according to the position of the students in the classroom. Comprehension was estimated by means of basic questions on the use of drugs. Results: In the control group only 38.75% of the students answered correctly when to take ibuprofen in relation to meals, 32.25% were right about the usual dose of the antibiotic and 61.88% identified the indication for omeprazole. In all three cases, significant differences in favor of understanding were found in the experimental group (OR = 1.93; 95% CI, 1.23 - 3.05; p = 0.0041, OR = 3.87; 95% CI, 2.43 - 6.25; p = 10-7 and OR = 3.55; 95% CI, 2.07 - 6.29; p = 3.67x10-5 respectively). Conclusions: The inclusion of pharmaceutical pictograms in package inserts is a simple strategy that could favor potentially the rational use of drugs. (AU)

Are we providing complete drug information to its users? Status of information adequacy of package insert in India.

Background: Package inserts (PIs) serve detailed information on drug products to the users and primary care physicians, so information should be accurate, reliable, and as per the regulatory guidelines. The study aims to analyze the information adequacy of the PIs available in the Indian market as per Drug and Cosmetic Rule 1945 and US Food and Drug Administration criteria. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on PIs collected from accessible pharmacy stores. Information provided was recorded as per criteria, and total information adequacy score (IAS) and information deficiency (IDS) score were calculated. The association of factors like single-drug/FDCs, a company of origin Indian/multinational, and route of administration (ROA) with IDS was statistically analyzed. Results: Of 120 PIs, 60%, 86.66%, and 73% were single-drug, prescription-drug, and drugs by Indian manufacturers, respectively. Most PIs provided generic names, ROA, and indications for use. 85%, 12%, 29.16%, and 3.33% provided information on PIs on the ability to drive, drug-food interactions, drug-drug interactions, and addiction potential, respectively. Lacking area was information on use in pediatrics-geriatrics (30%), excipients (28.3%), preclinical (15.83%), post-surveillance data (18.33%), and approval date (2.5%). There was a statistically significant difference between pharmaceutical score (3.22 vs 4.12), therapeutic score (11.5 vs 13.18), and total IAS (14.78 ± 3.39 vs 17.31 ± 2.33) of Indian and multinational companies. IDS was statistically significantly different in both pharmaceutical and therapeutic categories for single-drug vs FDCs (P = 0.00001), OTC vs prescription drugs (P < 0.05), and Indian vs multinational companies' PIs (P = 0.00001). Conclusion: Numerous facets of information are lacking in PIs, and they do not impart whole information, especially of Indian origin, as per objective IDS.

Association between health literacy and medication comprehension; attitudes toward reporting adverse events in adults using over-the-counter medicines.

BACKGROUND: Self-medication using over-the-counter (OTC) medicines is one of the effective self-care measures in dealing with daily health problems. Health literacy (HL) is critical to ensuring the appropriate use of OTC medicines. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between HL and comprehension of medication package inserts among adults who use OTC medicines. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire and interviews at 14 drugstores in the Kanto region in Japan from January to February 2020. The study participants were adults aged 20 years or older who purchased OTC medicines. HL was measured using the 14-item HL scale for Japanese adults (Japanese version of HLS-14), and comprehension of medication package inserts was evaluated using an interview survey (label comprehension study [LCS] form). The association between HL and LCS correct response rate and that between HL and attitude toward reporting adverse drug events (ADEs) were assessed using multiple linear regression and logistic regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS: The analysis included the data of 140 adults, 50 men (35.7%) and 90 women (64.3%), with an average age of 55.2 years. The average HLS-14 score was 51.6, and the overall correct answer rate for reading comprehension was 57.5%. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that a higher HLS-14 score was associated a higher LCS correct response rate (ß = 1.01, p = 0.001). In addition, logistic regression analysis revealed that higher HL was associated with positive attitude towards reporting ADEs to health professionals (adjusted odds ratio = 1.06, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with higher HL had higher comprehension of OTC package inserts, and higher HL was associated with positive attitude toward reporting ADEs to healthcare professionals. These results indicate that optimal self-medication with OTC medicines requires improving HL among the general public through health education and effective health information provision from pharmacists and registered sales clerks at drug stores.

The new guideline for evaluating effects of psychotropic drugs on the performance to drive a motor vehicle in Japan: Comparison with US FDA guideline.

In December 2022, the new guideline for evaluating the effect of psychotropic drugs on the performance to drive a motor vehicle was issued by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) and implemented in Japan. Of the safety information, information on the influence of medications on driving performance is particularly important because it can be relevant to the social functioning of patients. In principle, the package inserts of medications are designed based on evidence and provide precautions regarding the operation of heavy machinery such as automobiles in Japan, the United States, and Europe. The effects of medications on driving performance are generally evaluated in a tiered approach involving nonclinical and clinical studies. Because of the wide variety of functional domains involved in automobile driving, the selection of evaluation methods for a given medication depends on their characteristics, which is a complicated method. Therefore, to evaluate the effects of psychotropic drugs on driving performance efficiently and appropriately, we developed the MHLW guideline that specifically defines the evaluation methods used in pharmacological studies, the neuropsychological tests used in pharmacodynamic studies, and the situations in which driving studies are necessary. Regarding the planning of appropriate drug development strategies, we review the background of the MHLW guideline and its differences from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guideline.

Análise da qualidade das evidências científicas sobre a eficácia e segurança nas bulas de anticoagulantes orais diretos comercializados no Brasil / Analysis of the quality of scientific evidence on efficacy and safety in the package leaflets of direct oral anticoagulants marketed in Brazil

Objetivo: Identificar e analisar a qualidade das evidências científicas sobre a eficácia e segurança dos anticoagulantes orais direto (DOAC) disponíveis nos ensaios clínicos referenciados nas bulas dos medicamentos comercializados no Brasil. Método: Trata-se de um descritivo documental dividido em duas etapas, sendo elas: (i) identificação e análise da disponibilidade das referências bibliográficas contidas nas bulas dos DOAC e (ii) análise da qualidade dos estudos contidos nas bulas através da ferramenta da Cochrane Risk of Bias RevMan versão 5.4. Foram analisados setes domínios de importâncias para ensino clínico, sendo que cada domínio foi classificado como alto, incerto ou baixo risco de viés, segundo a avaliação dos colaboradores. Resultados: Foram analisadas 10 bulas destinadas aos profissionais da saúde. Sendo que destas, foram avaliados 25 ensaios clínicos. A análise da qualidade das evidências científicas, referenciadas nas bulas para profissionais dos DOAC, mostrou que os estudos citados apresentaram consistência metodológica. Entretanto, na maioria dos estudos, os domínios foram classificados como viés incerto, ou seja, não foi possível identificar como esses pontos foram abordados nos estudos. Conclusão: Portanto, o presente estudo evidenciou que a qualidade dos ensaios clínicos referenciados nas bulas dos DOAC apresentou incertezas metodológicas em seus ensaios. Sugere-se a necessidade de normativas que estabeleçam atualizações do conteúdo informativo presente nas bulas profissionais e estabeleçam descrição dos métodos de forma clara e coesa (AU).

Objective: Identify and analyze the quality of scientific evidence on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) available in clinical trials referenced in the package leaflets of drugs marketed in Brazil. Method: This is a descriptive documentary study divided into two stages: (i) identification and analysis of the availability of the bibliographic references contained in the package leaflets of DOACs and (ii) analysis of the quality of the studies contained in the package leaflets through the Cochrane Risk of Bias RevMan tool version 5.4. Seven domains of importance for clinical teaching were analyzed, and each domain was classified as high, uncertain or low risk of bias, according to the assessment of the collaborators. Results: Ten package leaflets intended for health professionals were analyzed. Of these, 25 clinical trials were evaluated. The analysis of the quality of the scientific evidence referenced in the package leaflets for health professionals showed that the cited studies presented methodological consistency. However, in most studies, the domains were classified as uncertain bias, i.e., it was not possible to identify how these points were addressed in the studies. Conclusion: Therefore, the present study evidenced that the quality of clinical trials referenced in the package leaflets of DOACs presented methodological uncertainties in their trials. It is suggested the need for regulations that establish updates of the information content present in the professional package inserts and establish a description of the methods in a clear and cohesive way (AU).

Medication package inserts do not present adequate information on potential risks for older adults in Brazil / Bulas de medicamentos não apresentam informações adequadas sobre potenciais riscos para idosos no Brasil

OBJECTIVE: To compare information on the risks of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for older adults in the Beers criteria with data in the package inserts made available by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency. METHODS: This is an observational, cross-sectional study that compared information on the package inserts of 33 brand-name drugs in the Brazilian market with specific recommendations for older adults contemplated in the Beers criteria, categorizing them into: complete, incomplete, absent, or discrepant. RESULTS: Among the analyzed package inserts, 21.21% did not present a specific section dedicated to the use of these drugs by older adults and data were scattered throughout the text; 63.64% were classified as incomplete; 33.33% lacked data; and 3.03% had discrepant information. CONCLUSION: The analyzed package inserts presented incomplete data or lacked information characterizing the drugs as PIMs for older adults. This study demonstrated that some package inserts of drugs used in Brazil are not satisfactory, warranting higher caution in the medical community when prescribing these medications and guiding patients

OBJETIVO: Comparar as informações sobre os riscos de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados (MPIs) para idosos contidas nos critérios Beers com as informações presentes nas bulas para profissionais de saúde disponibilizadas pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária no Brasil. METODOLOGIA: Estudo observacional e transversal que comparou informações das bulas para profissionais de saúde de 33 medicamentos de referência no mercado brasileiro com recomendações específicas para idosos contempladas nos critérios Beers e que foram categorizadas em: completas, incompletas, ausentes ou discrepantes. RESULTADOS: Dentre as bulas dos MPIs analisadas, 21,21% não apresentam seção específica destinada ao uso desses medicamentos por idosos, nas quais as informações estão dispersas pelo texto; 63,64% delas foram classificadas como incompletas; 33,33% tinham informações ausentes; e 3,03% com informações discrepantes. CONCLUSÃO: As bulas analisadas apresentaram dados incompletos ou não apresentam qualquer informação que caracterizasse o medicamento como MPI para idosos. Este estudo demonstra que algumas bulas de medicamentos utilizados no Brasil não estão satisfatórias, sugerindo maior cautela à comunidade médica na prescrição e na orientação aos seus pacientes

Using Package Inserts to Disseminate Information Regarding Drug Interactions Mediated by CYP3A Inhibition: Status and Issues / 医薬品情報学

Objective: In Japan, the Guideline on Drug Interaction for Drug Development and Appropriate Provision of Information (GL) was notified in 2018. In the GL and the associated document, it was determined that package inserts of drugs which need to be categorized as precaution due to the significant degree of drug interactions by CYP3A inhibition should describe possible perpetrator drugs using designated expressions, such as “strong CYP3A inhibitor.” For contraindication, it was decided that all drugs should be described individually. In 2021, as supplementary information to the GL, a list of CYP substrates, inhibitors and inducers, classified based on interaction strength and CYP isoenzymes (i.e., the drug list), was published. In this study, we aimed to survey the information on drug interactions by CYP3A inhibition described in the package inserts based on information in the drug list, and to clarify the status and issues.Methods: The package inserts of 24 substrate drugs of CYP3A with contraindications for itraconazole, a strong CYP3A inhibitor, were examined, and the descriptions of strong, moderate, and other CYP3A inhibitors were studied.Results: The frequencies of contraindication for strong CYP3A inhibitors were cobicistat (75%), grapefruit juice (0%), ritonavir (92%), voriconazole (67%), clarithromycin (50%), ceritinib (0%), and posaconazole (33%). On the other hand, some CYP3A substrate drugs was contraindicated with moderate CYP3A inhibitors but not with these strong CYP3A inhibitors. Furthermore, 19 CYP3A inhibitors, which were not on the drug list published in 2021, were identified as contraindications for co-administration. Majority of these were protease inhibitors, and some have been discontinued or not available in Japan.Conclusion: The findings of this study imply the necessity of organizing scientific description based on the GL strength classification. Moreover, it is important to disseminate the information and precautions for drug interactions provided in the package inserts to medical practice.

Thai Patients' Drug Safety Knowledge and Perceptions Relating to Different Forms of Written Medicine Information: A Comparative Study.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the medication safety knowledge, quality of the written medicine information (WMI), and perceptions of taking the medicines in patients receiving package inserts (PIs) in comparison with patient information leaflets (PILs). Methods: A cross-sectional, comparative study was conducted from December 2020 to May 2021 at two university hospitals in Thailand. Outpatients who visited the pharmacy departments and were prescribed one of the three medicines: atorvastatin, celecoxib, or metformin were randomly selected by a permuted block randomization. The medication safety knowledge was measured using a set of validated and closed questions. The quality of the WMI was measured by the Consumer Information Rating Form (CIRF). Satisfaction with information and perceptions of the benefits and risks of medications were rated by the participants using a visual analog scale (0 to 10). Results: Of the 1150 invited patients, 750 completed the questionnaires (65.2%). A higher proportion of respondents with high level of medication safety knowledge was found in those reading the PILs than the PIs (44.5% and 20.8%, respectively). The type of leaflet received was a significant predictor of the high knowledge level (p < 0.001). The mean CIRF scores were significantly higher among those reading the PILs than the PIs (p < 0.001). Patients reading the PILs were also more satisfied with the information and had more positive perceptions of the benefits from taking medicines and intention to adhere than those reading the PIs. Patients' perceptions of risks after reading both leaflets were moderate (median score = 5.0), with the PIL group having slightly more concern about risks than the PI group. Conclusion: The PILs showed superior effectiveness to the PIs in enhancing knowledge about medication safety, providing greater satisfaction with the information, and positive perceptions of benefit and intention to comply with the medications. PILs should be provided more frequently to patients receiving medicines than PIs.

Medications used in paediatric intensive care by continuous infusion: Do the technical aspects of the package inserts corroborate scientific evidence?

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Hospitalized paediatric patients are three times more likely to experience medication errors with the potential to cause harm, when they are compared to adults. The lack of research in paediatrics, difficulties that are derived as indications and the parameters of safety and effectiveness of pharmacological therapy in children. To analyse whether the technical and legal aspects of the package insert for medicines used in paediatric intensive care units (ICU) using a continuous infusion (CI) pump corroborate the recommendations of clinical protocols and legal provisions. METHODS: A documentary study, in which technical and legal information contained in the package inserts of medications commonly used via CI in neopediatric ICUs was analysed. The consultation of the medication package insert was carried out through the electronic portal of the National Health Surveillance Agency (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária - ANVISA). Information on the use of medications in the neonatal and paediatric populations via CI was sought in the medication package insert. To analyse the legal aspects, ANVISA's RDC no. 47/2009 was used. In order to compare the technical information, the Micromedex NeoFax®, Micromedex Paediatrics®, and Lexicomp® databases were consulted. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of the 13 medications analysed, 46% (n = 6) had some non-compliance with RDC 47/2009. Only 46% (n = 6) of the medications are indicated for paediatric use and only the medication package insert for midazolam (7.7%) contained the information considered essential for use via CI in paediatrics. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: This is an innovative study that identifies the weaknesses of the medication package inserts for medications used by CI in paediatric ICUs. Failure to comply with legal recommendations can make medication administration difficult and increase the probability that errors will occur; and the absence of specific technical information can make care difficult and compromise patient safety. It is important that there is supervision by regulatory agencies and the contribution of health professionals so that non-conformities are reported and corrected, to guarantee safe care for paediatric patients in intensive care.

Quality of clinical studies present in the package inserts of coagulation factors used in the treatment of hemophilia

ABSTRACT Objective To identify and analyze the quality of scientific evidence from clinical efficacy studies present in the package inserts of coagulation factors, used in the treatment of hemophilia A and B. Methods Documentary study developed in two stages. The first stage consisted of identifying the medicine packages inserts electronically registered in the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency, and analyzing the availability of the bibliographic references cited therein. This analysis was conducted in the PubMed, SciELO, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases. The second step was the analysis of the methodological quality of the efficacy studies. Two trained researchers used the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias version 5.1.0 tools for methodological quality analysis, and Review Manager 5.4 software to generate the risk of bias graph. Results Of the 17 medicines listed, 7 had referenced package inserts. Of these, 10 studies were eligible for analysis of methodological quality. More than half of the analyzed studies did not control for selection, performance, and detection bias. A total of 100% controlled attrition and reporting biases, and 50% had a high risk of conflict of interest. Conclusion The biases present are significant and may have influenced the overestimation of the effects of the outcomes of each of the studies.

Adverse drug reactions induced by hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of oral lichen planus: a report of 13 cases / 口腔疾病防治

Objective @# To analyze the adverse drug reaction（ADR） reports of hydroxychloroquine for clinical medication safety. @* Methods@#The ADR reports of hydroxychloroquine between May 2019 and May 2021 were analyzed. Age, reasons for drug use, time of ADR, combined drug use, and ADR outcomes were statistically analyzed. @*Results@# No severe ADR was reported. Patients over 60 years old accounted for 53.85% of the total cases, and the time of ADR appearance was significantly earlier among those under 60 years old. A total of 61.54% of ADRs were involved in multiple organs, and optic neurotoxicity was reported in 46.15% of cases. @*Conclusion@# In the treatment of oral lichen planus with hydroxychloroquine, adverse drug reactions should be monitored, and increased attention should be given to patients over 60 years old to ensure the safety of this medication.

Amamentação e utilização de medicamentos: qual a orientação presente nas bulas de anticoncepcionais e anti-infecciosos? / Breastfeeding and drug use: what is the orientation found in drug package inserts of contraceptives and anti-infective agents?

Resumo O objetivo deste artigo é avaliar a concordância entre bulas e fontes bibliográficas baseadas em evidências científicas quanto à presença de contraindicação do uso de anticoncepcionais e anti-infecciosos durante a amamentação. Foram selecionados medicamentos anticoncepcionais e anti-infecciosos, segundo a ATC, com registro na ANVISA e presentes nas fontes bibliográficas: Manual Amamentação e Uso de Medicamentos e Outras Substâncias, Medications and Mother's Milk, LactMed®, Micromedex® e UpToDate®. As informações foram extraídas das seções "Contraindicações" e "Advertências e precauções" das bulas e comparadas com as informações das fontes. Foi avaliada a presença de informação contraindicando o uso do medicamento durante a amamentação. Em cinco (55,5%) dos nove anticoncepcionais foi verificada contraindicação na bula. Entre as fontes bibliográficas, o percentual variou de 0% a 55,5%, dependendo da fonte. Para os anti-infecciosos, o percentual de contraindicação foi de 46,3% na bula, variando de 0% a 12,9% nas fontes. Existe concordância entre as bulas e as fontes bibliográficas com relação aos anticoncepcionais; no caso dos anti-infecciosos, as bulas apresentam contraindicação para o uso durante a amamentação com mais frequência.

Abstract This article aims to evaluate the conformity between drug package inserts (DPIs) and evidence-based bibliographic sources regarding the presence of contraindications to the use of contraceptives and anti-infective agents during breastfeeding. Contraceptive and anti-infectives were selected, according to ATC, with the updated record in the ANVISA and present in the bibliographic sources Breastfeeding and Use of Medicines and Other Substances, Medications and Mother's Milk, LactMed®, Micromedex® and UpToDate®. Information was extracted from the DPI "Contraindications" and "Warnings and precautions" sections and compared with the information in the bibliographic sources. The contraindication of the drug during breastfeeding was evaluated. Contraindications were found in the DPIs of five (55.5%) of the nine contraceptives. The contraindication percentage ranged from 0 to 55.5% among the bibliographic sources, depending on the source. The percentage was 46.3% in the DPIs, ranging from 0 to 12.9% in the bibliographic sources for anti-infectives. There is an agreement between the DPIs and the bibliographic sources regarding contraceptives; regarding anti-infectives, the DPIs are more often contraindicated for use during breastfeeding.

Vaccine package inserts and prescribing habits of obstetricians-gynecologists for maternal vaccination.

Despite ample evidence of the safety and efficacy of the influenza vaccine and the tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine during pregnancy, two-thirds of pregnant women do not receive these vaccines. Providers have a significant role in increasing prenatal vaccine uptake. It is important to understand how different sources of vaccine prescribing information, such as Food and Drug Administration package inserts, influence provider recommendations. We aimed to examine the role of vaccine package inserts in provider recommendations and perceptions of safety and effectiveness of vaccines during pregnancy. A cross-sectional survey was mailed to a random, weighted sample of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Fellows living in the United States in March 2019. Providers were asked about their attitudes toward package inserts, and to evaluate sample package insert statements following two different labeling rules. Their evaluations of each rule were then compared. Of the 321 respondents, the majority (90%, 288/321) recommended and/or administered maternal vaccinations. Few respondents (7.8%, 25/321) read package inserts for information regarding vaccination. Respondents were less likely to recommend sample vaccines with Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule-complying inserts (46.1%, 148/321) than vaccines with Pregnancy Category inserts (87.5%, 282/321). Although most providers did not actively utilize vaccine package inserts to inform recommendations, the previous Pregnancy Categories rule was preferred compared to the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule. Collaborative efforts to update inserts with current clinical practices for pregnancy would be valuable in reducing apprehensiveness around package inserts to generate safer and more cogent recommendations for pregnant women.

Deprescribing benzodiazepines: Do Brazilian package inserts address this issue? / Desprescrição de benzodiazepínicos: As bulas brasileiras abordam essa temática?

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the presence and quality of content on drug deprescribing in Brazilian package inserts for benzodiazepine drugs. METHODS: Documentary study where we analyzed data on deprescribing extracted from electronic package inserts of drugs containing benzodiazepines; these documents were available at the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency website. Our search was performed independently by 2 researchers who used the following keywords: "deprescription," "withdrawal," and "tapering." The deprescribing plan, when presented by the package insert, was compared to deprescribing protocols for benzodiazepines found in the literature. Moreover, we assessed the presence of guidance on the maximum length of treatment and risks of long-term use. RESULTS: We found 12 package inserts for benzodiazepines and 100% of them suggested gradual withdrawal; only 1 (8.33%) suggested a systematized deprescribing plan. One document (8.33%) did not offer guidance on maximum treatment duration. Eleven (91.67%) had the information on long-term use possibly causing dependence or tolerance, and 1 (8.33%) did not describe the risks of continuous use. CONCLUSIONS: It is known that benzodiazepines should be withdrawn in a gradual and schematized manner, but package inserts do not currently bring this information in detail. It is of utmost importance that health professionals be educated on their conduct, hence the necessity for updating medication package inserts.

OBJETIVO: Analisar a presença e a qualidade do conteúdo sobre desprescrição em bulas brasileiras de benzodiazepínicos. METODOLOGIA:Estudo do tipo documental, em que foram analisados dados sobre a desprescrição extraídos de bulas eletrônicas de medicamentos que contêm benzodiazepínicos disponibilizadas na página eletrônica da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. A busca foi realizada de forma independente por dois pesquisadores que utilizaram as palavras-chave "desprescrição", "retirada" e "redução". Para fins de comparação, quando a bula apresentou esquema de desprescrição, este foi comparado com protocolos de desprescrição de benzodiazepínicos encontrados na literatura. Além disso, foi analisada nas bulas a existência de orientações quanto ao tempo máximo de uso e os riscos do uso prolongado. RESULTADOS: Foram encontradas 12 bulas de benzodiazepínicos e 100% delas sugeriram a redução gradual do medicamento; apenas uma (8,33%) sugeria o esquema sistematizado de desprescrição. Uma (8,33%) não apresentou orientações quanto ao tempo máximo de uso. Onze (91,67%) continham a informação de que o uso prolongado pode causar dependência ou tolerância e uma (8,33%) não descrevia os riscos do uso contínuo. CONCLUSÕES: Sabe-se que os benzodiazepínicos devem ser retirados de forma gradual e esquematizada, porém, atualmente, as bulas não trazem essas informações de forma detalhada. É de suma importância que os profissionais de saúde sejam orientados quanto a sua conduta e, por isso, há grande necessidade de atualização das bulas.

[Pitfalls due to manufacturer instructions in modern joint surgery]. / Fallstricke durch Herstellerinstruktionen in der modernen Gelenkchirurgie.

Endoprosthetic implantations require the user to know numerous details of the installation process. Instructions from manufacturers are, therefore, always an essential part of legal proceedings in the event of premature implant failure. In addition to the application steps, the question of the application limits of the implants is also important. Patients' excessive safety expectations of the manufacturer or the medical user can also lead to avoidable product liability. Overall, there is a need to define standards and minimum requirements in package inserts and instructions, even if these can only be developed in accordance with the current state of science.

Ontological Organization and Bioinformatic Analysis of Adverse Drug Reactions From Package Inserts: Development and Usability Study.

BACKGROUND: Licensed drugs may cause unexpected adverse reactions in patients, resulting in morbidity, risk of mortality, therapy disruptions, and prolonged hospital stays. Officially approved drug package inserts list the adverse reactions identified from randomized controlled clinical trials with high evidence levels and worldwide postmarketing surveillance. Formal representation of the adverse drug reaction (ADR) enclosed in semistructured package inserts will enable deep recognition of side effects and rational drug use, substantially reduce morbidity, and decrease societal costs. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to present an ontological organization of traceable ADR information extracted from licensed package inserts. In addition, it will provide machine-understandable knowledge for bioinformatics analysis, semantic retrieval, and intelligent clinical applications. METHODS: Based on the essential content of package inserts, a generic ADR ontology model is proposed from two dimensions (and nine subdimensions), covering the ADR information and medication instructions. This is followed by a customized natural language processing method programmed with Python to retrieve the relevant information enclosed in package inserts. After the biocuration and identification of retrieved data from the package insert, an ADR ontology is automatically built for further bioinformatic analysis. RESULTS: We collected 165 package inserts of quinolone drugs from the National Medical Products Administration and other drug databases in China, and built a specialized ADR ontology containing 2879 classes and 15,711 semantic relations. For each quinolone drug, the reported ADR information and medication instructions have been logically represented and formally organized in an ADR ontology. To demonstrate its usage, the source data were further bioinformatically analyzed. For example, the number of drug-ADR triples and major ADRs associated with each active ingredient were recorded. The 10 ADRs most frequently observed among quinolones were identified and categorized based on the 18 categories defined in the proposal. The occurrence frequency, severity, and ADR mitigation method explicitly stated in package inserts were also analyzed, as well as the top 5 specific populations with contraindications for quinolone drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Ontological representation and organization using officially approved information from drug package inserts enables the identification and bioinformatic analysis of adverse reactions caused by a specific drug with regard to predefined ADR ontology classes and semantic relations. The resulting ontology-based ADR knowledge source classifies drug-specific adverse reactions, and supports a better understanding of ADRs and safer prescription of medications.