A Novel Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Vagal Nerve Hydrodissection With 5% Dextrose Without Local Anesthetic for Recalcitrant Chronic Multisite Pain and Autonomic Dysfunction.

Chronic pain is a complex condition that often poses diagnostic and management challenges due to its multifactorial etiology. This case report describes a 49-year-old pastor who presented with a three-year history of chronic pain affecting multiple sites, including the neck, bilateral shoulders, thoracic region, lower back, and bilateral knees. Additionally, he experienced shortness of breath on mild exertion, which adversely affected his ability to converse and speak publicly. The patient had a rapid resting heart rate of 100-120 beats per minute, occasional palpitations, and a 24-hour electrocardiogram that confirmed 15% premature ventricular complexes with bigeminy and trigeminy. He complained of limited appetite with early satiety, intermittent nausea, and regurgitation. Despite consultations with multiple specialists, no underlying causes were identified in the cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, or psychological domains. Ultrasound-guided bilateral vagus nerve hydrodissection using 5% dextrose without local anesthetics was administered three times at monthly intervals, resulting in remarkable pain relief within three months and the effects persisted at the nine-month follow-up. Tachycardia was no longer perceived, resting heart rate slowed to 70-80 beats per minute, shortness of breath improved, and public speaking ability was restored. The patient's early satiety, nausea, and reflux complaints were resolved. This case report highlights the potential effectiveness of this novel intervention for chronic pain. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and explore the mechanism of action.

Outcomes After a Statewide Policy to Improve Evidence-Based Treatment of Back Pain Among Medicaid Enrollees in Oregon.

BACKGROUND: A novel Oregon Medicaid policy guiding back pain management combined opioid restrictions with emphasis on non-opioid and non-pharmacologic therapies. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of the policy on prescribing, health outcomes, and health service utilization. DESIGN: Using Medicaid enrollment, medical and prescription claims, prescription drug monitoring program, and vital statistics files, we analyzed the policy's association with selected outcomes using interrupted time series models. SUBJECTS: Adult Medicaid patients with back pain enrolled between 2014 and 2018. INTERVENTION: The Oregon Medicaid back pain policy. MAIN MEASURES: Opioid and non-opioid medication prescribing, procedural care, substance use and mental health conditions, and outpatient and inpatient healthcare utilization. KEY RESULTS: The policy was associated with decreases in the percentage of Medicaid enrollees with back pain receiving any opioids (- 2.68 percentage points [95% CI - 3.14, - 2.23] level, - 1.01 pp [95% CI - 1.1, - 0.92] slope), days of short-acting opioid use (- 0.4 days [95% CI - 0.53, - 0.26] slope), receipt of more than 7 days of short-acting opioids (- 2.36 pp [95% CI - 2.76, - 1.95] level, - 0.91 pp [95% CI - 1, - 0.83] slope), chronic opioid use (- 1.27 pp [95% CI - 1.59, - 0.94] level, - 0.46 [95% CI - 0.53, - 0.39 slope), and spinal surgeries and procedures. Among secondary outcomes, we found no increase in opioid overdose and a small, statistically significant trend decrease in opioid use disorders. There were small increases in non-opioid substance use and mental health diagnoses and visits but no increase in self-harm. CONCLUSIONS: A state Medicaid policy emphasizing evidence-based back pain management was associated with decreases in opioid prescribing, spinal surgeries, and opioid use disorder trends, but also short-term increases in mental health encounters and an increase in non-opioid substance use disorder trends. Such policies may help reinforce evidence-based care, but must be designed with consideration of potential harms.

Anesthetic management with labor epidural analgesia of the parturient with severe factor VII deficiency: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Factor VII deficiency is considered a contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia due to the risk of an epidural hematoma. CASE REPORT: A 32 year old G1P0 parturient with severe factor VII deficiency presented for an anesthesiology consultation at 32 weeks gestation. Initial coagulation studies were significant for an elevated INR (2.0) and a low factor VII level of 6%. After interdisciplinary discussion, it was decided that neuraxial analgesia could be offered if her coagulation studies corrected after administration of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). The patient presented at 36 weeks gestation for a rFVIIa challenge. She received 22 mcg/kg rFVIIa and coagulation studies were analyzed 20 minutes later which showed complete correction of the coagulopathy. The patient presented to the hospital at 39 weeks and 3 days for delivery, received 2 mg rFVIIa and 20 minutes later, successfully received an epidural catheter. Her INR was monitored every 3 hours during her labor course and rFVIIa was given if the INR was 1.3 or greater. She required three additional doses over 22 hours. No bleeding or thrombotic events occurred, and the patient was discharged home without complications. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the safe management of an epidural catheter in a parturient with severe factor VII deficiency.

Comprehensive Observational and Longitudinal study on the Outbreak of Stroke-related Spasticity focusing on the Early Onset management with Botulinum NeuroToxin (COLOSSEO-BoNT): protocol for a real-world prospective observational study on upper limb spasticity.

INTRODUCTION: Poststroke spasticity (PSS) affects up to 40% of patients who had a stroke. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) has been shown to improve spasticity, but the optimal timing of its application remains unclear. While several predictors of upper limb PSS are known, their utility in clinical practice in relation to BoNT-A treatment has yet to be fully elucidated. The COLOSSEO-BoNT study aims to investigate predictors of PSS and the effects of BoNT-A timing on spasticity-related metrics in a real-world setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The recruitment will involve approximately 960 patients who have recently experienced an ischaemic stroke (within 10 days, V0) and will follow them up for 24 months. Parameters will be gathered at specific intervals: (V1) 4, (V2) 8, (V3) 12, (V4) 18 months and (V5) 24 months following enrolment. Patients will be monitored throughout their rehabilitation and outpatient clinic journeys and will be compared based on their BoNT-A treatment status-distinguishing between patients receiving treatment at different timings and those who undergo rehabilitation without treatment. Potential predictors will encompass the Fugl-Meyer assessment, the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), stroke radiological characteristics, performance status, therapies and access to patient care pathways. Outcomes will evaluate muscle stiffness using the modified Ashworth scale and passive range of motion, along with measures of quality of life, pain, and functionality. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study underwent review and approval by the Ethics Committee of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy. Regardless of the outcome, the findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05379413.

Acceptability of multimodal and multidisciplinary group-based program for chronic low back pain: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The Programa d'Atenció Integral pels Pacients amb Dolor Crònic (PAINDOC) is a multimodal and multidisciplinary group-based program that integrates pain neuroscience education, mindfulness meditation, pain psychotherapy, Empowered Relief, and therapeutic exercise. It serves as a therapeutic option for individuals with chronic low back pain, providing them with comprehensive adaptive strategies for pain management. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study explores participants' retrospective acceptability of the PAINDOC Program. METHODS: To ensure demographic variability and information power, a purposive sampling approach was applied. Twelve participants were interviewed through three focus groups, supplemented with four individual semi-structured interviews. Data was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and evaluated based on the Therapeutic Framework of Acceptability. RESULTS: Participants provide positive feedback regarding active pain coping strategies and improved self-management. While certain aspects of the Program were more emphasized, participants integrated tools from all components. Strategies included pain reconceptualization, positive self-talk, or problem-solving. The Program's ethicality was closely linked to individual values and may also be influenced by time constraints of certain program elements, the immediate effects of specific approaches, participant perceptions, and individual preferences. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide valuable insights into the acceptability of the PAINDOC Program, guiding future improvements and the development of similar interventions.

Multidisciplinary approaches to chronic pain management have been explored and are recognized as an effective way to address the complexity of chronic pain conditions. These approaches often involve the collaboration of healthcare professionals from various disciplines.Multimodal pain management programs typically combine various treatment modalities, including physical therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, medication, and exercise.Studies have shown that multidisciplinary and multimodal interventions can be effective in reducing pain intensity, improving physical function, and enhancing quality of life in chronic low back pain patients. What does this study add? The multidisciplinary and multimodal group-based PAINDOC Program is acceptable for chronic low back pain patients.Participants noted the effectiveness of the program in helping them adopt active pain coping strategies and improve self-management.The ethicality of the multimodal Program depends on individual personal value systems, as certain program components may be less suitable for some participants.There might be some barriers to program adherence, including limited available time, the higher physical demands of exercise, the immediate effects of certain approaches, participants' perceptions, and individual needs and preferences.

The impact of combined administration of ropivacaine and dexamethasone on postoperative analgesia in perianal surgery with pudendal nerve block under ultrasound guidance: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Background: In recent years, severe pain after perianal surgery has seriously affected the prognosis of hospitalized patients. How to maximize the improvement of postoperative pain and perioperative comfort becomes particularly important. Methods: This study was a double-blind randomized controlled trial (Registration No.: ChiCTR2100048760, Registration Date: 16 July 2021, Link: www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=130226), and patients were randomly divided into two groups: one group underwent postoperative 20 mL bilateral pudendal nerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine (P group), and the other group underwent postoperative 20 mL bilateral pudendal nerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine + 8 mg dexamethasone (PD group). The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate to severe pain at the first postoperative dressing change. Secondary outcomes included Quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 3 days after surgery, sleep quality, pain score at 3 days after surgery, and incidence of adverse events. Results: In the main outcome indicators, the incidence was 41.7% in the P group and 24.2% in the PD group (p = 0.01). The QoR-15 score and sleep quality in PD group were better than those in P group 2 days before surgery. The incidence of postoperative urinary retention was significantly decreased in PD group (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Local anesthesia with dexamethasone combined with pudendal nerve block after perianal surgery can reduce the incidence of moderate to severe pain during the first dressing change. This may be one of the approaches to multimodal analgesia after perianal surgery. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier ChiCTR2100048760.

Effect analysis of applying high-quality service model to surgical nursing.

BACKGROUND: Surgical care of the hand plays a crucial role in the medical field, as problems with the hand can profoundly affect a patient's quality of life and function. In order to meet the needs of patients, improve patient satisfaction and improve treatment outcomes, high-quality service models have been introduced in the field of nursing. AIM: To explore the effect analysis of applying high-quality service model to surgical nursing. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent hand surgery at our hospital between 2019 and 2022, using a quality service model that included improved patient education, pain management, care team collaboration, and effective communication. Another group of patients received traditional care as a control group. We compared postoperative recovery, satisfaction, complication rate, and length of hospital stay between the two groups. Inferential statistics were used to compare the difference between the two groups by independent sample t test, Chi-square test and other methods to evaluate the effect of intervention measures. RESULTS: Postoperative recovery time decreased from 17.8 ± 2.3 d to 14.5 ± 2.1 d, pain score decreased from 4.7 ± 1.9 to 3.2 ± 1.4, and hand function score increased from 78.4 ± 7.1 to 88.5 ± 6.2. In terms of patient satisfaction, the quality service model group scored 87.3 ± 5.6 points, which was significantly higher than that of the traditional care group (74.6 ± 6.3 points). At the same time, patients' understanding of medical information also improved from 6.9 ± 1.4 to 8.6 ± 1.2. In terms of postoperative complications, the application of the quality service model reduced the incidence of postoperative complications from 26% to 10%, the incidence of infection from 12% to 5%, and the incidence of bleeding from 10% to 3%. The reduction in these data indicates that the quality service model plays a positive role in reducing the risk of complications. In addition, the average hospital stay of patients in the quality service model group was shortened from 6.8 ± 1.5 d to 5.2 ± 1.3 d, and the hospitalization cost was also reduced from 2800 ± 600 yuan to 2500 ± 500 yuan. CONCLUSION: Applying a quality service model to hand surgery care can significantly improve patient clinical outcomes, including faster recovery, less pain, greater satisfaction, and reduced complication rates.

EMLA cream in burns: A systematic review of safety, analgesic efficacy, and effects on burn pathophysiology.

AIM: Management of procedural pain in burn care is challenging. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream 5%, eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA®), is a widely used, effective local anesthetic cream approved for normal intact skin, genital mucosa for superficial surgical procedures, and debridement of chronic leg ulcers. This comprehensive review aimed to determine the safety, analgesic efficacy, and effects of EMLA on burn pathophysiology to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for introducing the topical anesthetic into burn care. METHODS: The PRISMA guidelines were followed for conducting a systematic PubMed search to include all relevant preclinical and clinical studies, according to pre-specified eligibility criteria. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in a qualitative synthesis, among which nine were human and six were animal studies. To date, safety and pharmacokinetic data on EMLA application in burns have been limited. Nevertheless, human studies indicated that EMLA is safe and provides adequate procedural-pain relief in adults when applied to smaller burns. Caution should be exercised when using EMLA in younger children, as systemic toxicity, pertaining to prilocaine-induced methemoglobinemia, has been reported owing to overdosing (high doses applied over large burn areas). Furthermore, animal studies demonstrate the potential beneficial effects of EMLA on burn pathophysiology such as anti-inflammatory, decreased capillary permeability to plasma proteins and edema formation, and improved tissue perfusion, which are factors that may impact burn wound progression. CONCLUSION: Current data on EMLA use in the management of procedural pain in small burns are sparse but suggest that EMLA is safe and effective in adults. Further clinical pharmacokinetic studies are warranted, especially for application on larger burn areas.

Use of corticosteroids for adult chronic pain interventions: sympathetic and peripheral nerve blocks, trigger point injections - guidelines from the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, the International Pain and Spine Intervention Society, and the North American Spine Society.

BACKGROUND: There is potential for adverse events from corticosteroid injections, including increase in blood glucose, decrease in bone mineral density and suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Published studies note that doses lower than those commonly injected provide similar benefit. METHODS: Development of the practice guideline was approved by the Board of Directors of American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine with several other societies agreeing to participate. The scope of guidelines was agreed on to include safety of the injection technique (landmark-guided, ultrasound or radiology-aided injections); effect of the addition of the corticosteroid on the efficacy of the injectate (local anesthetic or saline); and adverse events related to the injection. Based on preliminary discussions, it was decided to structure the topics into three separate guidelines as follows: (1) sympathetic, peripheral nerve blocks and trigger point injections; (2) joints; and (3) neuraxial, facet, sacroiliac joints and related topics (vaccine and anticoagulants). Experts were assigned topics to perform a comprehensive review of the literature and to draft statements and recommendations, which were refined and voted for consensus (≥75% agreement) using a modified Delphi process. The United States Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence and strength of recommendation was followed. RESULTS: This guideline deals with the use and safety of corticosteroid injections for sympathetic, peripheral nerve blocks and trigger point injections for adult chronic pain conditions. All the statements and recommendations were approved by all participants after four rounds of discussion. The Practice Guidelines Committees and Board of Directors of the participating societies also approved all the statements and recommendations. The safety of some procedures, including stellate blocks, lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks and some sites of trigger point injections, is improved by imaging guidance. The addition of non-particulate corticosteroid to the local anesthetic is beneficial in cluster headaches but not in other types of headaches. Corticosteroid may provide additional benefit in transverse abdominal plane blocks and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks in postherniorrhaphy pain but there is no evidence for pudendal nerve blocks. There is minimal benefit for the use of corticosteroids in trigger point injections. CONCLUSIONS: In this practice guideline, we provided recommendations on the use of corticosteroids in sympathetic blocks, peripheral nerve blocks, and trigger point injections to assist clinicians in making informed decisions.

Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine on patient-centred outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is increasingly used for surgical patients requiring general anaesthesia. However, its effectiveness on patient-centred outcomes remains uncertain. Our main objective was to evaluate the patient-centred effectiveness of intraoperative dexmedetomidine for adult patients requiring surgery under general anaesthesia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CINAHL from inception to October 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine with placebo, opioid, or usual care in adult patients requiring surgery under general anaesthesia were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two reviewers independently. We synthesised data using a random-effects Bayesian regression framework to derive effect estimates and the probability of a clinically important effect. For continuous outcomes, we pooled instruments with similar constructs using standardised mean differences (SMDs) and converted SMDs and credible intervals (CrIs) to their original scale when appropriate. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Our primary outcome was quality of recovery after surgery. To guide interpretation on the original scale, the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) instrument was used (range 0-150 points, minimally important difference [MID] of 6 points). RESULTS: We identified 49,069 citations, from which 44 RCTs involving 5904 participants were eligible. Intraoperative dexmedetomidine administration was associated with improvement in postoperative QoR-15 (mean difference 9, 95% CrI 4-14, n=21 RCTs, moderate certainty of evidence). We found 99% probability of any benefit and 88% probability of achieving the MID. There was a reduction in chronic pain incidence (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% CrI 0.19-0.79, n=7 RCTs, low certainty of evidence). There was also increased risk of clinically significant hypotension (OR 1.98, 95% CrI 0.84-3.92, posterior probability of harm 94%, n=8 RCTs) and clinically significant bradycardia (OR 1.74, 95% CrI 0.93-3.34, posterior probability of harm 95%, n=10 RCTs), with very low certainty of evidence for both. There was limited evidence to inform other secondary patient-centred outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo or standard of care, intraoperative dexmedetomidine likely results in meaningful improvement in the quality of recovery and chronic pain after surgery. However, it might increase clinically important bradycardia and hypotension. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO (CRD42023439896).

Exploring Relations Between Unique Patient Characteristics and Virtual Reality Immersion Level on Anxiety and Pain in Patients Undergoing Venipuncture: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Control Trial.

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) is a well-researched digital intervention that has been used for managing acute pain and anxiety in pediatric patients undergoing various medical procedures. This study focuses on investigating the role of unique patient characteristics and VR immersion level on the effectiveness of VR for managing pediatric pain and anxiety during venipuncture. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine how specific patient characteristics and level of immersion during a VR intervention impact anxiety and pain levels for pediatric patients undergoing venipuncture procedures. METHODS: This study is a secondary data analysis of 2 combined, previously published randomized control trials on 252 pediatric patients aged 10-21 years observed at Children's Hospital Los Angeles from April 12, 2017, to July 24, 2019. One randomized clinical trial was conducted in 3 clinical environments examining peripheral intravenous catheter placement (radiology and an infusion center) and blood draw (phlebotomy). Conditional process analysis was used to conduct moderation and mediation analyses to assess the impact of immersion level during the VR intervention. RESULTS: Significant moderation was found between the level of immersion and anxiety sensitivity when predicting postprocedural anxiety (P=.01). Patients exhibiting the highest anxiety sensitivity within the standard of care yielded a 1.9 (95% CI 0.9-2.8; P<.001)-point elevation in postprocedural anxiety relative to individuals with high immersion levels. No other significant factors were found to mediate or moderate the effect of immersion on either postprocedural anxiety or pain. CONCLUSIONS: VR is most effective for patients with higher anxiety sensitivity who report feeling highly immersed. Age, location of the procedure, and gender of the patient were not found to significantly impact VR's success in managing levels of postprocedural pain or anxiety, suggesting that immersive VR may be a beneficial intervention for a broad pediatric population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04268901; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04268901.

"It Has Improved My Practice to Be Able to Offer Alternative Treatments": A Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Oregon Medicaid Back Pain Providers.

Introduction: This study aimed to understand health care providers' experiences implementing the Oregon Back Pain Policy (OBPP) over time. The Medicaid OBPP expanded coverage of evidence-based nonpharmacological therapy (NPT) for back pain and restricted access to opioid therapy and interventional approaches. Methods: The study included six online, asynchronous focus groups with providers in February 2020 (Time 1) and August 2022 (Time 2). Analysis was conducted with a longitudinal, recurrent cross-sectional approach. Analysis occurred in three stages: (1) An immersion/crystallization approach was used to analyze Time 1 focus group data, (2) reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze Time 2 data, and (3) longitudinal analysis was used to integrate the findings across time points. Results: At Time 1, 48 clinicians and 44 NPT providers participated in the study. Time 2 included 63 clinicians and 59 NPT providers. The longitudinal analysis of the focus group data resulted in four themes: (1) general awareness of the policy, (2) providers support the policy and perceive a benefit to their patients, (3) barriers to NPT accessibility, and (4) barriers to referring patients to NPT. Conclusion: The goal of the OBPP was to improve back pain care for Oregon Medicaid members by increasing access to evidence-based NPT and decreasing reliance on opioid medications. This study revealed that, although clinicians and NPT providers supported the policy, they faced persistent implementation challenges related to referrals, prior authorizations, coverage limitations, low reimbursement rates, and a reduced workforce for NPT providers. In some cases, implementation barriers were removed during the COVID-19 pandemic, but other challenges were more prominent during the pandemic.

Conversion to general anesthesia and intravenous supplementation during intrapartum cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery with or without conversion to general anesthesia has been shown to negatively impact maternal and perinatal morbidity. Efforts to reduce these adverse events are a recent focus of obstetric anesthesia care. We aimed to assess rates of and risk factors for conversion to general anesthesia and intraoperative pain during intrapartum cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter in our academic center. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all women undergoing cesarean delivery with an indwelling epidural catheter between January 2017 and June 2022 were included. Labor epidural analgesia was provided according to a standardized protocol, and conversion to epidural anesthesia was achieved in the operating room before surgery. We determined the conversion rate to general anesthesia and associated risk factors. Second, we examined the rate of administration of analgesics/sedatives and related risk factors in cesarean cases that were not converted to general anesthesia. RESULTS: Among the 1192 women undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia, there were 97 cases with conversion to general anesthesia (8.1%), of which 87 (89.7%) were due to a failed epidural. Higher age, higher weight, and higher gestational age were associated with decreased odds of conversion to general anesthesia. Higher gravidity and longer surgical time were associated with increased odds. An emergent indication was not associated with conversion to general anesthesia. Intravenous analgesic/sedative supplementation occurred in 141 cases (12.9%). Higher age was associated with decreased odds of supplementation, and longer surgical time was associated with increased odds. CONCLUSION: In our tertiary academic center, the rate of intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia and administration of analgesic/sedative medication among women undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia was relatively high. Emergency cesarean delivery was not associated with either of the above endpoints.

How to undertake a pain assessment for -patients with acute post-operative pain.

RATIONALE AND KEY POINTS: Acute post-operative pain is common among patients in secondary care settings, and the alleviation of this pain is a principal responsibility for all healthcare professionals, including nurses. To achieve this, it is essential to regularly undertake comprehensive pain assessments, using validated pain assessment tools, for all patients who have undergone a surgical procedure. Inadequate pain assessment may lead to ineffective or inappropriate pain management, which can adversely affect the patient's recovery and increase their risk of developing chronic pain. •  Pain is a subjective experience and therefore requires individualised, comprehensive assessment and management interventions. •  The assessment process for patients with acute pain is fundamental to understanding the patient's current status, informing differential diagnoses regarding the underlying cause of the pain, providing appropriate treatment and monitoring, and evaluating the effectiveness of treatment. •  Pain assessment should not be undertaken as a one-off care activity; it should be completed whenever a patient reports pain and repeated following pharmacological and/or non-pharmacological interventions. REFLECTIVE ACTIVITY: 'How to' articles can help you to update your practice and ensure it remains evidence-based. Apply this article to your practice. Reflect on and write a short account of: •  How this article might improve your practice when undertaking a comprehensive pain assessment with patients experiencing acute post-operative pain. •  How you could use this information to educate nursing students or colleagues on the appropriate actions to take when undertaking a comprehensive pain assessment with patients experiencing acute post-operative pain.

Nursing students' pain management self-efficacy and attitude towards patients with chronic pain: What can be done better in education? A cross-sectional study.

AIM: This study has been conducted to determine nursing students' pain management self-efficacy and attitudes towards patients with chronic pain. BACKGROUND: Pain is a significant phenomenon that often leads individuals to seek medical attention, influenced by various factors and commonly encountered by healthcare professionals. Adequate knowledge and positive attitudes among nurses play a crucial role in the thorough assessment and effective management of pain, resulting in favorable outcomes for hospitalized individuals. DESIGN: This study used a descriptive cross-sectional design. METHODS: The research was conducted with 322 undergraduate students who were continuing their education in the autumn semester of the 2023-2024 academic year at Aksaray University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing. Data have been collected by using Student Information Form, Pain Management Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PMSEQ) and the Attitude of Healthcare Professionals towards Patients with Chronic Pain Scale. Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis significance test and Spearman Correlation analysis have been used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: The mean total score of the PMSEQ was 62.91 (SD 15.58) and the mean total score of the Attitude of Healthcare Professionals Towards Patients with Chronic Pain Scale was 3.94 (SD.52). Those students who willingly opted for the nursing profession, perceived themselves as proficient in managing chronic pain, administered care to patients experiencing pain during clinical placements, believed they received sufficient education in pain management throughout their studies and rated their overall health status as "very poor" demonstrated higher levels of self-efficacy in pain management (p<0.05). As a result of the analysis performed according to the mean scores of the Attitude of Healthcare Professionals Towards Chronic Pain Patients Scale and its sub-dimensions of the students participating in the study, a statistically significant difference has been found according to their gender, academic year and self-sufficiency in pain management (p<0.05). It has been determined that there is a weak positive correlation between the total mean scores of the participants' PMSEQ and the Attitude of Healthcare Professionals Towards Patients with Chronic Pain scale (r=.260; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, as nursing students' self-confidence in pain management self-efficacy increased, their attitudes towards patients with pain also increased positively. In the nursing curriculum, there is a necessity for integrating pain management education and fostering awareness to adequately equip nursing students in addressing the pain requirements of patients.

Assessment of catheter position using chest CT in adults undergoing erector spinae plane analgesia for rib fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) analgesia is a common adjuvant for patients with traumatic rib fracture pain and success relies on the ESP catheter remaining within the correct fascial plane for the duration of its placement. However, knowledge on postplacement position of indwelling ESP catheters is largely absent. We hypothesized that migration of over-the-needle ESP catheters was common and detectable with coincidental postprocedure CT. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, adults admitted to the surgical intensive care unit for traumatic rib fractures between January 2020 and July 2022 were screened. Those receiving continuous ESP analgesia via indwelling catheter and undergoing subsequent chest CT were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of catheters that migrated outside the ESP. The secondary outcome was the distance between the catheter tip and the nearest transverse process (TP) or fascial plane. RESULTS: 160 medical records were screened for eligibility and 15 patients (18 catheters) met the inclusion criteria. 16 of 18 catheters reviewed were found outside the ESP. Furthermore, catheter position was reported as intramuscular in 14 catheters and subcutaneous in 4 catheters. The median distance between catheter tip and the nearest TP (or the ESP) was 23.20 mm sagittally and 25.05 mm axially. CONCLUSIONS: Most ESP catheters were found superficial to the fascial plane in the days following their placement. The median distance between the catheter and the ESP is between 23 and 25 mm. Prospective studies should address catheter migration concerns and propose solutions to this common issue.

Comparing the effects of pre-emptive oxycodone, diclofenac, and gabapentin on postoperative pain after tibia fracture surgery: A randomized clinical trail.

Background: Postoperative pain (POP) is one of the most common and most important types of pain. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of pre-emptive oxycodone, diclofenac, and gabapentin on postoperative pain (POP) among patients with tibia fracture surgery. Materials and Methods: This double-blind three-group randomised controlled trial was conducted in 2023. Participants were 111 candidates for tibia fracture surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomly allocated to oxycodone, gabapentin, and diclofenac groups through block randomisation. Baseline arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, and blood pressure were documented before surgery and POP and sedation status were measured during postoperative recovery and 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Postoperative opioid analgesic use was also documented. The data were analysed using the SPSS software (v. 20.0) at a significance level of less than 0.05. Results: Groups did not significantly differ from each other respecting participants' baseline age, gender, body mass index, arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, and surgery duration (P > 0.05). Moreover, there were no significant differences among the groups respecting POP and sedation status at different measurement time points (P > 0.05), except for six hours after surgery at which the POP mean score in the gabapentin group was significantly less than the other two groups (P = 0.001). Among-group differences respecting postoperative use of opioid analgesics and medication side effects were also insignificant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Pre-emptive oxycodone, diclofenac, and gabapentin significantly reduce POP among patients with tibia fracture surgery, though gabapentin may produce more significant analgesic effects. All these three medications can be used for pre-emptive analgesia. Of course, the best pre-emptive analgesic agent is determined based on the opinion of the treating physician.