New categorization of chest pain: noncardiac is in, atypical is out!

Chest pain poses a diagnostic challenge in the emergency department and requires a thorough clinical assessment. The traditional distinction between "atypical" and "typical" chest pain carries the risk of not addressing nonischemic clinical pictures. The newly conceived subdivision into cardiac, possibly cardiac, and (probably) noncardiac causes of the presenting symptom complex addresses a much more interdisciplinary approach to a symptom-oriented diagnostic algorithm. The diagnostic structures of the chest pain units in Germany do not currently reflect this. An adaptation should therefore be considered.

Virtual Pain Unit Is Associated with Improvement of Postoperative Analgesia Quality: A Retrospective Single-Center Clinical Study.

INTRODUCTION: Acute postoperative pain is a major concern among surgical patients. Thus, this study established a new acute pain management model and compared the effects of the acute pain service (APS) model in 2020 and the virtual pain unit (VPU) model in 2021 on postoperative analgesia quality. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center clinical study involved 21,281 patients from 2020 to 2021. First, the patients were grouped on the basis of their pain management model (APS and VPU). The incidence of moderate to severe postoperative pain (MSPP) [numeric rating scale (NRS) score ≥ 5], postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and postoperative dizziness were recorded. RESULTS: The VPU group recorded significantly lower MSPP incidence (1-12 months), PONV, and postoperative dizziness (1-10 months and 12 months) compared with the APS group. In addition, the annual average incidence of MSPP, PONV, and postoperative dizziness in the VPU group was significantly lower than in the APS group. CONCLUSIONS: The VPU model reduces the incidence of moderate to severe postoperative pain, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness; hence, it is a promising acute pain management model.

Análisis individualizado por sexo de los factores asociados a la clasificación inicial errónea en urgencias del dolor torácico como no coronario / Factors associated with erroneous emergency department noncardiac chest pain classifications in men and women

Introducción. Analizar de forma independiente en mujeres y hombres la frecuencia y las características clínicas asociadas a una clasificación inicial errónea (CIE) en urgencias del dolor torácico (DT) como no coronario. Método. Se analizan todas las consultas por DT atendidas en urgencias entre 2008 y 2017 clasificadas inicialmente (historia clínica y ECG) como DT no coronario. Se consideró como CIE si el diagnóstico final fue síndrome coronario agudo (SCA). Se crearon dos modelos multivariable, uno con 10 factores de riesgo, y otro con 10 características clínicas del DT, en los que se investigó la asociación de estas variables con una CIE. Se analizaron independientemente mujeres y hombres. Resultados. Se analizaron 8.093 mujeres con DT clasificado inicialmente como no coronario (edad mediana: 54 años, RIC: 38-73), 72 con CIE (0,9%). Los factores de riesgo asociados independientemente a CIE fueron obesidad (OR = 0,40; IC 95% = 0,17-0,97) y consumo de cocaína (5,18; 1,16-23,2), y las características clínicas fueron relación con el esfuerzo (2,01; 1,21-3,33), existencia de irradiación (2,05; 1,23-3,41) y síntomas vegetativos acompañantes (1,86; 1,02-3,41). Se analizaron 9.979 hombres (edad mediana: 47 años, RIC: 33-64), 83 con CIE (0,8%). Los factores de riesgo asociados a CIE fueron edad > 40 años (1,74; 1,04-2,91) e hipertensión (0,45; 0,24-0,84). No hubo características clínicas del DT asociadas a CIE. Conclusión. En las mujeres con dolor torácico, se identifican más características asociadas al error de clasificación que en los hombres. Este estudio remarca la necesidad de análisis independiente por sexo en el SCA, en el que clásica- mente se ha considerado la clínica en las mujeres como atípica. (AU)

Objective. To analyze the frequency and clinical characteristics associated with erroneous initial classifications of noncardiac chest pain (NCP) in men and women. Methods. We analyzed all case records in which chest pain was initially classified as noncardiac in origin according to clinical signs and electrocardiograms evaluated in our emergency department between 2008 and 2017. We considered the initial evaluation of NCP to be in error if the final diagnosis was acute coronary syndrome. A risk model for an erroneous initial classification of NCP was developed based on multivariable analysis of our patient data. We also used multivariable analysis to explore associations between 10 clinical signs of chest pain and an erroneous initial NCP classification. The data for men and women were analyzed separately. Results. NCP was the initial classification for 8093 women; their median (interquartile range) age was 54 (38-73) years. The classification was in error for 72 women (0.9%). Odds ratios (ORs) showed that patient risk factors associated with an erroneous NCP classification in the women in our series were obesity (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17- 0.97) and cocaine consumption (OR, 5.18; 95% CI, 1.16-23.2). Clinical risk factors associated with erroneous NCP classification in women were recent physical exertion (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.21-3.33), radiation exposure (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.23-3.41), and vegetative symptoms (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.02-3.41). For 9979 men with a median age of 47 (33-64) years, NCP was the initial classification; in 83 of the men (0.8%) the classification was erroneous. Patient factors associated with erroneous NCP classification in men were age over 40 years (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.04-2.91) and hypertension (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.84). No clinical signs of chest pain in men were associated with error. Conclusions. More clinical characteristics are associated with an erroneous classification of NCP in women. [...] (AU)

Assessment of the Management of Patients with Chronic Pain Referred to a Specialized Pain Unit: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study (the DUO Project).

A multicenter cross-sectional study was designed to assess the quality of treatment of 1190 patients with chronic pain at the time of referral to a specialized pain unit. A total of 119 physicians from 77 pain units throughout Spain collected 23 indicators of the quality of care from 10 consecutive clinical records of chronic pain patients (5 men, 5 women). Degenerative spinal diseases (38.6%) and lumbosciatic pain (29.8%) were the most common etiologies. At the time of referral to the pain unit, 9.8% of patients were not receiving any analgesic treatment. Treatment was modified in 88.1% of the patients by adding adjuvant drugs, adding opioids or increasing the doses of analgesic medications, and using analgesic techniques. Women had higher percentages of osteoarthritis, headache and fibromyalgia as the cause of pain, longer duration of pain and severe pain intensity, and a higher proportion of changes in the diagnosis of the underlying condition with which they had been referred to the pain unit. Improvements should be made in the patient management and referral protocols not only in the clinics prior to patient referral to the pain unit, but also in the pain units themselves.

Factors associated with erroneous emergency department noncardiac chest pain classifications in men and women. / Análisis individualizado por sexo de los factores asociados a la clasificación inicial errónea en urgencias del dolor torácico como no coronario.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the frequency and clinical characteristics associated with erroneous initial classifications of noncardiac chest pain (NCP) in men and women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed all case records in which chest pain was initially classified as noncardiac in origin according to clinical signs and electrocardiograms evaluated in our emergency department between 2008 and 2017. We considered the initial evaluation of NCP to be in error if the final diagnosis was acute coronary syndrome. A risk model for an erroneous initial classification of NCP was developed based on multivariable analysis of our patient data. We also used multivariable analysis to explore associations between 10 clinical signs of chest pain and an erroneous initial NCP classification. The data for men and women were analyzed separately. RESULTS: NCP was the initial classification for 8093 women; their median (interquartile range) age was 54 (38-73) years. The classification was in error for 72 women (0.9%). Odds ratios (ORs) showed that patient risk factors associated with an erroneous NCP classification in the women in our series were obesity (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17- 0.97) and cocaine consumption (OR, 5.18; 95% CI, 1.16-23.2). Clinical risk factors associated with erroneous NCP classification in women were recent physical exertion (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.21-3.33), radiation exposure (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.23-3.41), and vegetative symptoms (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.02-3.41). For 9979 men with a median age of 47 (33-64) years, NCP was the initial classification; in 83 of the men (0.8%) the classification was erroneous. Patient factors associated with erroneous NCP classification in men were age over 40 years (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.04-2.91) and hypertension (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.84). No clinical signs of chest pain in men were associated with error. CONCLUSION: More clinical characteristics are associated with an erroneous classification of NCP in women. Our findings underline the need to assess the possibility of acute coronary syndrome differently in women, in whom the signs have usually been considered to be atypical.

OBJETIVO: Analizar de forma independiente en mujeres y hombres la frecuencia y las características clínicas asociadas a una clasificación inicial errónea (CIE) en urgencias del dolor torácico (DT) como no coronario. METODO: Se analizan todas las consultas por DT atendidas en urgencias entre 2008 y 2017 clasificadas inicialmente (historia clínica y ECG) como DT no coronario. Se consideró como CIE si el diagnóstico final fue síndrome coronario agudo (SCA). Se crearon dos modelos multivariable, uno con 10 factores de riesgo, y otro con 10 características clínicas del DT, en los que se investigó la asociación de estas variables con una CIE. Se analizaron independientemente mujeres y hombres. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 8.093 mujeres con DT clasificado inicialmente como no coronario (edad mediana: 54 años, RIC: 38-73), 72 con CIE (0,9%). Los factores de riesgo asociados independientemente a CIE fueron obesidad (OR = 0,40; IC 95% = 0,17-0,97) y consumo de cocaína (5,18; 1,16-23,2), y las características clínicas fueron relación con el esfuerzo (2,01; 1,21-3,33), existencia de irradiación (2,05; 1,23-3,41) y síntomas vegetativos acompañantes (1,86; 1,02-3,41). Se analizaron 9.979 hombres (edad mediana: 47 años, RIC: 33-64), 83 con CIE (0,8%). Los factores de riesgo asociados a CIE fueron edad > 40 años (1,74; 1,04-2,91) e hipertensión (0,45; 0,24-0,84). No hubo características clínicas del DT asociadas a CIE. CONCLUSIONES: En las mujeres con dolor torácico, se idenfitican más características asociadas al error de clasificación que en los hombres. Este estudio remarca la necesidad de análisis independiente por sexo en el SCA, en el que clásicamente se ha considerado la clínica en las mujeres como atípica.

Influencia de las comorbilidades en la intensidad del dolor en los pacientes con lumbalgia crónica / Influence of comorbidities on pain intensity in patients with chronic low back pain

ObjetivoEl dolor crónico es un proceso complejo que puede variar dependiendo de factores como el tiempo de evolución, estado de ánimo o incluso experiencias previas vividas. Nuestro objetivo es describir las características de los pacientes que acuden con diagnóstico de lumbalgia a una primera visita en la Unidad del Dolor (UD) y buscar aquellos factores que pueden interferir en la percepción del dolor.MétodosSe realiza un análisis inferencial de los pacientes que acuden por primera vez a la UD del Hospital de la Santa Creu y Sant Pau de Barcelona con diagnóstico de lumbalgia crónica durante el periodo de Noviembre 2012 a Noviembre 2018. La intensidad del dolor promedio en las últimas 24 horas se cuantifica utilizando datos del cuestionario Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Utilizando regresión linear múltiple, se valoran los factores predictivos independientes de intensidad de dolor EVN24.ResultadosLa variable de mayor impacto fue el grado de depresión según HAD_D. Utilizando regresión logística binaria para el análisis multivariado, se obtuvo un modelo que se relaciona (r = 0,354, p < 0,001) de manera significativa con la intensidad del dolor (EVN24).ConclusionesEl tratamiento especializado de la lumbalgia en las UD debe tener en cuenta el perfil de paciente y en especial los trastornos afectivos y las comorbilidades asociadas ya que predicen una mayor intensidad del dolor. En consecuencia, la comorbilidad asociada no solo repercute en la mayor intensidad del dolor, sino que las características físicas que acompañan al paciente durante todo el proceso pueden influir o incluso comprometer el tratamiento. (AU)

ObjectivesChronic pain is a complex process that can vary depending on factors such as time evolution, mood, or even previous experiences. Our objective is to describe patient's characteristics from those who were referred with a diagnosis of low back pain in their first Pain Unit (PU) visit, and identify those factors that may interfere with their pain perception.MethodsInferential analysis was carried out from data recorded in the PU database of the Hospital de la Santa Creu y Sant Pau in Barcelona, from November 2012 to November 2018. The average pain intensity during the last 24 hours (EVN24) was quantified using data from the BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) questionnaire. Using multiple linear regression, the independent predictive factors related to pain intensity (EVN24) were assessed.ResultsMood disorders (Degree of depresión acording HAD_D level) was the variable with the highest impact in pain perception. Using binary logistic regression for multivariate analysis, a model of variables related to pain intensity (EVN24) was obtained (R = 0.354, P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe specialized treatment of low back pain in PUs must take into account the patient's profile and especially the affective disorders and associated comorbidities since they predict a greater intensity of pain. Consequently, the associated comorbidity not only affects the greater intensity of pain, but the physical characteristics that accompany the patient throughout the process can influence or even compromise treatment. (AU)

Unexpected high level of severe events even in low-risk profile chest pain unit patients.

AIMS: Early heart attack awareness programs are thought to increase efficacy of chest pain units (CPU) by providing live-saving information to the community. We hypothesized that self-referral might be a feasible alternative to activation of emergency medical services (EMS) in selected chest pain patients with a specific low-risk profile. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this observational registry-based study, data from 4743 CPU patients were analyzed for differences between those with or without severe or fatal prehospital or in-unit events (out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and/or in-unit death, resuscitation or ventricular tachycardia). In order to identify a low-risk subset in which early self-referral might be recommended to reduce prehospital critical time intervals, the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score for in-hospital mortality and a specific low-risk CPU score developed from the data by multivariate regression analysis were applied and corresponding event rates were calculated. Male gender, cardiac symptoms other than chest pain, first onset of symptoms and a history of myocardial infarction, heart failure or cardioverter defibrillator implantation increased propensity for critical events. Event rates within the low-risk subsets varied from 0.5-2.8%. Those patients with preinfarction angina experienced fewer events. CONCLUSIONS: When educating patients and the general population about angina pectoris symptoms and early admission, activation of EMS remains recommended. Even in patients without any CPU-specific risk factor, self-referral bears the risk of severe or fatal pre- or in-unit events of 0.6%. However, admission should not be delayed, and self-referral might be feasible in patients with previous symptoms of preinfarction angina.

Influence of comorbidities on pain intensity in patients with chronic low back pain. / Influencia de las comorbilidades en la intensidad del dolor en los pacientes con lumbalgia crónica.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic pain is a complex process that can vary depending on factors such as time evolution, mood, or even previous experiences. Our objective is to describe patient's characteristics from those who were referred with a diagnosis of low back pain in their first Pain Unit (PU) visit, and identify those factors that may interfere with their pain perception. METHODS: Inferential analysis was carried out from data recorded in the PU database of the Hospital de la Santa Creu y Sant Pau in Barcelona, from November 2012 to November 2018. The average pain intensity during the last 24 hours (EVN24) was quantified using data from the BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) questionnaire. Using multiple linear regression, the independent predictive factors related to pain intensity (EVN24) were assessed. RESULTS: Mood disorders (Degree of depresión acording HAD_D level) was the variable with the highest impact in pain perception. Using binary logistic regression for multivariate analysis, a model of variables related to pain intensity (EVN24) was obtained (R = 0.354, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The specialized treatment of low back pain in PUs must take into account the patient's profile and especially the affective disorders and associated comorbidities since they predict a greater intensity of pain. Consequently, the associated comorbidity not only affects the greater intensity of pain, but the physical characteristics that accompany the patient throughout the process can influence or even compromise treatment.

Neuropatía peronea secundaria a ganglión extraneural: revisión de literatura y propuesta de tratamiento. Caso no positivo / Peroneal neuropathy caused by an extraneural ganglion: literary review and treatment proposal. A non-positive case

La discopatía lumbar con afectación de raíces lumbares L4 o L5 es una causa frecuente de consulta y, en casos severos, puede ser el origen de dolor neuropático en el miembro inferior y/o de un pie equino por compromiso de la musculatura dorsiflexora del pie. Sin embargo, la causa de esta clínica no siempre está en relación con la patología lumbar ni el sistema nervioso central, siendo vital su correcto diagnóstico diferencial. Este artículo presenta el caso de un paciente de 69 años con una neuropatía compresiva peronea secun­daria a un ganglión, inicialmente interpretada como una radicu­lopatía L5. Este incorrecto enfoque supuso la sobremedicación del paciente, un mal control algésico, la realización de una discectomía L4-L5 innecesaria y una pobre evolución neurológica. Un enfoque diagnóstico correcto y un abordaje tera­péutico precoz habrían supuesto una mayor mejoría clínica e incluso una recuperación neurológica completa del paciente. Por ello, este caso sirve para resaltar: a) el va­lor de la ecografía en neuropatías periféricas como herramienta diagnóstica y pronóstica y el de la ecografía en gangliones como arma diagnóstico-­terapéutica; b) el uso de las pruebas diagnósticas como apoyo a una exploración física exhaustiva, y no como diagnóstico en sí mismas, y c) la importancia de la publicación de casos no positivos para optimizar recursos, evitar repetir errores, reducir el sesgo de publicación y facilitar el inicio de proyectos de investigación.(AU)

Lumbar disc disease with L4 or L5 lumbar root involvement is a common cause of medical attendance. In severe circumstances it can lead to neuropathic pain, weakness and foot drop. However, this clinical presentation is not always related with lumbar or central nervous system pathology, being the differential diagnosis of great importance. It is reported a case of 69-year-old patient with a peroneal nerve entrapment caused by an extraneural ganglion, misdiagnosed as a L5 radiculopathy. This incorrect approach entailed patient overmedication, poor pain control, an unnecessary L4-L5 discectomy, and a poor neurological outcome. In this case, an early diagnosis and therapeutic approach would have meant not only a greater clinical improvement and even a complete neurological recovery. Moreover, this case highlights: a) the value of ecography in periphe­ral neuropathies as a diagnostic and prognostic tool and ultrasounds in ganglions cyst as a diagnostic and therapeutic weapon; b) the use of diagnostic tests to support a thorough physical examination, not as a diagnosis themselves; and c) the importance of non-positive cases publication to optimize resources, avoid repeating mistakes, reduce publication bias and facilitate the start of research projects.(AU)

Medical history of coronary artery disease and time to electrocardiogram in the emergency department: a real-life, single-center, retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Timely acquisition of 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) in the emergency department (ED) is crucial and recommended by current guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association of medical history of coronary artery disease (hCAD) on door-to-ECG time in the ED. METHODS: In this single center, retrospective cohort study, patients admitted to ED for cardiac evaluation were grouped according to hCAD and no hCAD. The primary outcome was door-to-ECG time. A multivariate analysis adjusted for the cofounders sex, age, type of referral and shift was performed to evaluate the association of hCAD with door-to-ECG time. RESULTS: 1101 patients were included in this analysis. 362 patients (33%) had hCAD. Patients with hCAD had shorter door-to-ECG time (20 min. [Inter Quartile Range [IQR] 13-30] vs. 22 min. [IQR 14-37]; p < 0.001) when compared to patients with no hCAD. In a multivariable regression analysis hCAD was significantly associated with a shorter door-to-ECG time (- 3 min [p = 0.007; 95% confidence Interval [CI] - 5.16 to - 0.84 min]). CONCLUSION: In this single center registry, hCAD was associated with shorter door-to-ECG time. In patients presenting in ED for cardiac evaluation, timely ECG diagnostic should be facilitated irrespective of hCAD.

Estudio descriptivo sobre el perfil de los pacientes derivados a la Unidad de Tratamiento del Dolor Crónico del Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín (utdc-hugcdn) como base para la reorganización de esta / Descriptive study on the profile of patients sent to the Chronic Pain Treatment Unit of the University Hospital of Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín (utdc-hugcdn) as a basis for the reorganization of this

Objetivo: Conocer las necesidades y fortalezas de nuestra Unidad derivadas del conocimiento del perfil de paciente que es remitido para la atención en la misma. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio descriptivo transversal sobre 5000 pacientes derivados a nuestra Unidad entre 2017 y 2020. Se recogieron de forma anónima los siguientes datos: número de pacientes remitidos por mes, edad, sexo, servicio remisor, localización del dolor, pacientes/interconsultas preferentes, rechazados y atendidos previamente. De los 1000 primeros pacientes también se registraron los antecedentes quirúrgicos, existencia o no de obesidad y consumo de fármacos psicoactivos. Resultados: Son derivados para valoración unos 1560 pacientes de media anuales (130 al mes), con una edad media de 59,8 años (± 14,3) de los cuales el 62,6 % son mujeres. Un 62,08 % se encontraba en edad laboral. Los servicios asistenciales que remitieron más pacientes fueron: Traumatología, Neurocirugía, Unidad de Raquis y Rehabilitación. El 6,6 % de las derivaciones fueron calificadas como preferentes. Fueron rechazadas el 9,98 % de las interconsultas. Los tipos de dolores según su localización más frecuentes fueron: lumbalgia, cervicalgia y dolores generalizados. Se constató la toma habitual de ansiolíticos y/o antidepresivos en un 34,9 %, el 10,8 % eran obesos y el 10,3 % sufrían dolor crónico postquirúrgico. Conclusiones: El perfil del paciente predominante derivado a nuestra unidad suele ser el de un adulto mayor, en edad laboral, de género femenino, derivado desde el servicio de Traumatología y con dolor en la región lumbar, perfil muy similar al descrito en otras unidades del dolor del mundo occidental desarrollado. Más de 1 de cada 3 pacientes puede sufrir ansiedad y/o depresión, siendo también muy frecuente el dolor postquirúrgico y la obesidad.(AU)

Objective: Determine the shortcomings and strengths of our pain clinic derived from the knowledge of the profile of the patients who are referred for care in the clinic. Patients and methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study on 5000 patients referred to our pain clinic between 2017 y 2020. The following data were collected: number of patients referred per month, age, sex, referring service, location of pain, patients referred preferentially, rejected patients, and previously attended consultations. Data on surgical history, obesity, and use of psychoactive drugs were also recorded for the first 1000 patients. Results: An average of 1560 patients were referred for evaluation per year (130 per month), with a mean age of 59.8 years (± 14.3) of which 62.6 % are women and 62.08 % were of working age. The healthcare services that referred the most patients were Orthopedic Surgery, Neurosurgery, Spine Unit and Rehabilitation. 6.6 % of the requests were derived preferentially. Of the referrals, 9.98 % were rejected. The most frequent pain locations were low back pain, neck pain and generalized pain. In the The usual taking of anxiolytics and / or antidepressants was found in 34.9 %, 10.8 % were diagnosed as obese and 10.3 % were referred for chronic postoperative pain. Conclusions: The profile of the predominant patient referred to our pain clinic is an older adult, of working age, female, referred from the orthopedics department and with pain in the lumbar region. This described profile is very similar to other pain units in the developed western world. Almost one in 3 patients may suffer from anxiety and / or depression, and post-surgical pain and obesity are also very common.(AU)

Predictores de demora en el intervencionismo coronario percutáneo primario en el infarto de miocardio diagnosticado en hospitales sin hemodinámica / Time from electrocardiographic diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction to guidewire crossing in patients transferred to a hospital for primary angioplasty: factors associated with delay

Objetivos: Identificar variables predictoras del retraso hasta la angioplastia primaria, en los pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del ST (IAMEST) trasladados desde el medio extrahospitalario o desde hospitales sin hemodinámica. Método: Estudio de cohortes, retrospectivo, realizado entre 2008 y 2018 en un hospital universitario receptor de pacientes con diagnóstico de IAMEST y que requirieron angioplastia primaria. Se realizó un análisis multivariable de regresión logística y lineal para identificar variables predictoras de demora de tiempo de electrocardiograma (ECG) diagnóstico hasta el paso de guía. Resultados: Se incluyeron 1.039 pacientes en el estudio. Doscientos noventa y seis pacientes (28,4%) presentaban tiempos ECG diagnóstico-paso de guía > 120 minutos. Las variables asociadas a tiempos prolongados de angioplastia primaria fueron la edad avanzada [odds ratio (OR) = 1,02; IC 95%: 1,01-1,04] la insuficiencia cardiaca grave al ingreso (OR = 2,28; IC 95%: 1,23-4,22), la cirugía cardiaca previa de bypass (OR = 10,01; IC 95%: 2,60-41,81), la muerte súbita extrahospitalaria recuperada (OR = 4,34; IC 95%: 1,84-10,32), la localización lateral del infarto (OR = 1,64; IC 95%: 1,06-2,51), el primer contacto con hospital sin disponibilidad de hemodinámica (OR = 1,52; IC 95%: 1,05- 2,21), la atención fuera de horas (OR = 1,46; IC 95%: 1,06-2,02) y finalmente la distancia en kilómetros al centro con hemodinámica (OR = 1,04; IC 95%: 1,03-1,05). Conclusiones: En los pacientes con IAMEST que requirieron traslado a un centro con hemodinámica, la demora en la realización de la angioplastia primaria se relacionó con factores clínicos, con características del infarto y logísticas. (AU)

Objective: To identify predictors of primary angioplasty delay in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) transported from out-of-hospital sites or from hospitals without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) suites. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of cases between 2008 and 2018 in a university hospital receiving patients diagnosed with STEMI who required a PCI. We performed linear and multivariate regression analyses to identify factors that predicted delay in interpreting a diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG) until the guidewire passed the lesion (diagnosis–guidewire-crossing time). Results: A total of 1039 cases were studied; 296 patients (28.4%) had delays of more than 120 minutes between STEMI diagnosis and guidewire crossing. Factors associated with PCI delay were advanced age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04]), severe heart failure on admission (OR = 2.28; 95% CI, 1.23–4.22), history of cardiac bypass surgery (OR = 10.01; 95% CI, 2.60–41.81), out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OR = 4.34; 95% CI, 1.84–10.32), lateral ischemia (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.06–2.51), first medical attention in a hospital without a PCI suite (OR = 1.52; 95% CI, 1.05–2.21), first medical attention outside regular working hours (OR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.06–2.02), and distance in kilometers to a PCI suite (OR = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03–1.05). Conclusions: Patients with STEMI who required transport to a hospital with a PCI suite experienced primary angioplasty delays. Delays were related to logistical and clinical factors as well as to infarction characteristics. (AU)

Predictors of primary percutaneous coronary intervention delay in cases of myocardial infarction diagnosed in hospitals without hemodynamic support systems / Predictores de demora en el intervencionismo coronario percutáneo primario en el infarto de miocardio diagnosticado en hospitales sin hemodinámica.

OBJECTIVES: The need for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in hospitals without hemodynamic support capability is associated with delays between first medical contact (FMC) and reperfusion. It is important to identify factors involved in delays, particularly if they are relevant to the organization of emergency services. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analysis of a registry of patients treated in hospitals without advanced hemodynamic support systems in a catchment area with an established care network for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The registry included care times. RESULTS: The network served 2542 patients with a mean (SD) age of 63 (13) years. FMC-to-reperfusion time was within 120 minutes in 42% of the cases. Nine of the hospitals had a chest-pain unit in the emergency department, and this factor was an independent predictor of FMC-to-reperfusion times of 120 minutes or less (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54­0.77; P < .0001); the time was shortened by 11 minutes in such hospitals. FMC-to-reperfusion was delayed beyond 120 minutes in relation to the following factors: shock and need for intubation at start of care, age, gender, FMC at night, left bundle branch block, and Killip class. One-month and 1-year mortality rates increased in hospitals without hemodynamic support systems in proportion to reperfusion delay, by 1.7% and 3.5% if the delay was 106 minutes or less and by 7.3% and 12.4% if the delay was 176 minutes or longer (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: FMC-to-reperfusion time in STEMI exceeds recommendations in 58% of the hospitals without hemodynamic support systems and delay is inversely proportional to the availability of an emergency department chest pain unit. One-month and 1-year mortality is proportional to the degree of delay.

OBJETIVO: La indicación de intervencionismo coronario percutáneo primario (ICPP) en hospitales sin hemodinámica (HSH) se asocia con tiempos primera asistencia-apertura de la arteria (TPA) prolongados. Es pertinente identificar los factores implicados, especialmente aquellos relacionados con la organización de los servicios de urgencias. METODO: Análisis de un registro de pacientes atendidos en HSH en una región sanitaria con una red asistencial para infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST (IAMEST) establecida y de sus tiempos de actuación. RESULTADOS: En 2.542 pacientes, de edad 63 ± 13 años, se alcanzó un TPA 120 minutos en un 42% de casos. En 9 de los 16 HSH analizados existía un box de dolor torácico en el área de urgencias, que se comportó como factor predictor independiente de un TPA 120 minutos [OR 0,64 (IC 95% 0,54-0,77), p 0,001], con una reducción de 11 minutos de este. Se asociaron de forma independiente con un TPA superior a 120 minutos la intubación y shock durante la primera asistencia, edad, sexo, atención en horario nocturno, bloqueo de rama izquierda y la clase Killip. La mortalidad al mes y al año aumentó en los HSH proporcionalmente al TPA (1,7% y 3,5% si TPA 106 minutos y del 7,3% y 12,4% si TPA 176 minutos, p 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: El TPA alcanzado en activaciones procedentes de HSH supera las recomendaciones en el 58% de casos y se relaciona inversamente con la disponibilidad de un box de dolor torácico en urgencias. La mortalidad al mes y al año es proporcional al grado de retraso en la reperfusión.

Management of Pulmonary Embolism: Results from the German Chest Pain Unit Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2008, specialized chest pain units (CPUs) were implemented across Germany ensuring structured diagnostics in acute chest pain. This study aims to analyze the management of pulmonary embolism (PE) patients in such certified CPUs. METHODS: Data were retrieved from 13,902 patients enrolled in the German CPU registry and analyzed for the diagnosis of PE including patient characteristics, critical time intervals, diagnostic workup, treatment, and prognosis. PE patients were compared to the overall CPU patient cohort. Only patients with a complete 3-month follow-up were included. RESULTS: Overall, 1.1% of all CPU patients were diagnosed with PE. Chest pain and dyspnea were the leading symptoms. Patients with PE were older, presented with higher heart rates, and more frequently exhibited signs of heart failure, despite a normal left ventricular function. PE patients showed significantly longer time delays between symptom onset and the first medical contact, while PE patients with chest pain presented earlier than PE patients with dyspnea only. Whereas more PE patients had to be transferred to the intensive care unit, in-CPU mortality and event rates over 3 months were low. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This study suggests a certain risk for underdiagnosis and consecutive potential undertreatment of PE patients in German Cardiac Society (GCS)-certified CPUs, which is thought to result from an anticipated focus on patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Public awareness for PE beyond chest pain should be improved. Certified CPUs should be urged to implement strategic pathways for a better simultaneous diagnostic workup of differential diagnosis beyond ACS.

An Update on Resources, Procedures and Healthcare Provision in Pain Units: A Survey of Spanish Practitioners.

Multidisciplinary pain treatment units are recommended to provide comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of chronic pain, a complex clinical syndrome and one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. The objective of this study was to provide updated results on the situation of pain treatment units in Spain and to determine compliance with recommendations proposed by de Spanish Ministry of Health (SMH). A cross-sectional, prospective, multicenter survey was performed, collecting data on resources, procedures and healthcare provision. Between March and May 2019, the Spanish Pain Society sent an invitation letter to 183 pain units with a link to the questionnaire. Sixty-nine units from 13 regions agreed to participate. According to the International Association for the Study of Pain criteria, only 12 units were classified as multidisciplinary pain centers. Most (95.7%) were in hospitals, 82.6% from the public sector, and 46.4% had protocols to coordinate with primary care. Interviewees rated the adequacy of facilities at 6.3 (from 0 to 10). Moreover, 67% of interviewees found that there were insufficient staff, with no mental health professionals, physical therapists or social workers in 49.3%, 87.0% and 97.1% units, respectively. Only 24 pain units had a day hospital, 44.9% offered psychological interventions, and 79.7% supported teaching and research activities. Results suggest that a small proportion of Spanish pain units meet the national standards for multidisciplinary pain units proposed by the SMH.

Comparison of two strategies in a chest pain unit: stress echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare stress echocardiography (SE) and multidetector computed tomography (MCT) in patients admitted to a chest pain unit to detect acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: A total of 203 patients with ≥ 1 cardiovascular risk factor, no ischemic electrocardiogram changes and negative biomarkers were randomized to SE (n=103) or MTC (n=100). The primary endpoint was a combination of hard events (death and nonfatal myocardial infarction), revascularizations, and readmissions during follow-up. The secondary endpoint was the cost of the 2 strategies. RESULTS: Invasive angiography was performed in 61 patients (34 [33%] in the SE group and in 27 [27%] in the MCT group, P=.15). A final diagnosis of ACS was made in 53 patients (88% vs 85%, P=.35). There were no significant differences between groups in the primary endpoint (42% vs 41%, P=.91), or in hard events (5% vs 7%, P=.42). There were no significant differences in overall cost, but costs were lower in patients with negative SE than in those with negative MCT (€557 vs €706, P <.02). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found in efficacy and safety for the stratification of patients with a low to moderate probability of ACS admitted to a chest pain unit. The cost of the 2 strategies was similar, but cost was significantly lower for SE on comparison of negative studies.