Evaluation of sleep profile in schizophrenia patients treated with extended-release paliperidone: an open-label prospective study in Southeast Asia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of 6 months of treatment with paliperidone extended-release (ER) tablets on the sleep profile of patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: A total of 984 patients meeting the The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for schizophrenia who switched their antipsychotic to paliperidone ER were recruited from 61 sites in five countries in Southeast Asia. We recorded patient demographics and assessed sleep quality and daytime drowsiness using visual analog scales. RESULTS: Approximately 70% of patients completed the 6-month study. After the use of paliperidone ER, patients reported significantly better sleep quality (76.44 vs 65.48; p<0.001) and less daytime drowsiness compared with their baseline value (23.18 vs 34.22; p<0.001). Factors predicting sleep profile improvement were completion of the study and higher baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores. CONCLUSION: Paliperidone ER can help schizophrenia patients to improve sleep quality and reduce daytime drowsiness; this was seen especially in the patients who completed the 6-month treatment period and had higher baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores.

Effects of paliperidone extended release on hostility among Thai patients with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: This open-label prospective study investigated the effects of paliperidone extended release (ER) on hostility in Thai patients with schizophrenia. BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia may be hostile or exhibit aggressive behavior, which can occasion their admission to psychiatric hospital. Antipsychotic medications are often used to treat hostility and aggression in such patients. Paliperidone ER is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, there are no data available for paliperidone ER with regard to its efficacy on hostility and aggression among Thai patients. This study was a part of the PERFEcT study, a 6-month, open-label, multicenter, multicountry, prospective trial to explore the safety, efficacy, and functionality of paliperidone ER tablets. The current study included only the data obtained from Thai participants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flexible dosing of paliperidone ER in a range of 3-12 mg/day was used, allowing investigators to adjust the dosage of each subject individually. The 199 Thai patients had a stable Clinical Global Impression - severity score before enrollment. Demographic data were collected at enrollment, and assessments took place at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postbaseline. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale were used to evaluate efficacy. In this analysis, we report the findings for the specific PANSS factor P7 (hostility) and the PSP subscale disturbing and aggressive behavior. Data were analyzed using paired t-test method to investigate changes in mean PANSS and PSP total and subscale scores. The significance level was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: From a total of 199 Thai patients, 148 patients (74.4%) participated in all visits. There was a significant reduction in mean scores for all total PANSS measures from 1 month onward compared with baseline, as well as ongoing significant reductions in scores from visit to visit. There was a significant reduction in mean hostility score at 2 months (P<0.05), 3 months (P<0.05), and 6 months (P<0.01) (n=148). For the PSP scale, there was a significant across-the-board reduction of mean scores from 3 months onward, including in the disturbing and aggressive behavior subscale (P<0.001) (n=148). CONCLUSION: Switching from previously unsuccessful antipsychotic treatments to paliperidone ER may be a useful option to reduce hostility and disturbing behavior in patients with schizophrenia. This study in Thai patients is in line with findings in other countries and cultures concerning the management of hostility in patients with schizophrenia.

Prolactin Levels After Switching to Paliperidone Palmitate in Patients with Schizophrenia.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the tolerability and efficacy of paliperidone palmitate and its effect on the levels of prolactin in patients with schizophrenia. Method: A prospective study was carried out in 22 Japanese middle-aged patients with schizophrenia who were switched from paliperidone-extended release or risperidone long-acting injectable to paliperidone palmitate for a minimum of 12 months. Psychotic symptoms using the 18-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, extrapyramidal symptoms using 9-item Drug-induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale, and plasma prolactin levels using fasting blood samples were assessed at Baseline, and one, three, six, and 12 months. Results: There were significant reductions in prolactin levels at one, three, and six months relative to baseline in the male subjects switched from risperidone long-acting injectable, while prolactin levels in male subjects switched from paliperidone-extended release and the female subjects switched from risperidone long-acting injectable or paliperidone-extended release were largely unchanged. No time-sequential changes were observed in total scores of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Drug-induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale, irrespective of previous antipsychotics treatment. Conclusion: Switching from paliperidone-extended release or risperidone long-acting injectable to paliperidone palmitate did not result in any observed time-sequential changes in psychotic symptoms in study subjects, and prolactin levels decreased in male subjects switched from risperidone long-acting injectable. As measurement of paliperidone concentrations is limited in routine practice, a fluctuation range of prolactin levels may be a useful marker for confirmation of safety maintenance treatment with long-acting injectables in clinical settings.

Paliperidone for the treatment of schizoaffective disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Schizoaffective disorder (SCA) is a complex mental illness characterized by psychosis and affective symptoms. Treatment usually involves concomitant therapy with antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and/or antidepressants. Effective treatment must address acute symptoms, maintain long-term stability, promote recovery, and improve patient functioning. AREAS COVERED: Data from 3 pivotal studies evaluating the acute and maintenance treatment of SCA with paliperidone are reviewed. Two formulations of paliperidone have been studied for these indications: an extended-release oral formulation (NCT00397033, NCT00412373) and long-acting injectable once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (NCT01193153). The reported effects of these formulations on psychotic, depressive, and manic symptoms are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Both formulations were found to be safe and effective for the acute and maintenance treatment of SCA. Of critical importance for this treatment population is that rapid improvement was seen in all major symptoms of SCA, including psychosis, depression, and mania. Mediation analyses suggest that the known antipsychotic effects of paliperidone occur independently of its antidepressant effects. Both formulations of the drug are effective when used as monotherapy or adjunctively with antidepressants or mood stabilizers. Beyond symptom control, both formulations improved patient functioning and increased patient satisfaction.

Paliperidone Palmitate for Schizoaffective Disorder: A Review of the Clinical Evidence.

INTRODUCTION: Despite being frequently diagnosed, there has been very limited study of efficacious treatments for schizoaffective disorder. Paliperidone had been approved for the treatment of schizoaffective disorder, and a recently completed relapse prevention study of the use of a once-monthly injectable paliperidone formulation has also led to an indication for that preparation to treat schizoaffective disorder. METHODS: To review the efficacy and tolerability of paliperidone for schizoaffective disorder, we conducted a systematic literature search of studies of paliperidone in the treatment of schizoaffective disorder, and briefly reviewed evidence regarding the somewhat controversial nature of that diagnostic entity. RESULTS: We located several studies of the use of paliperidone extended release in the treatment of schizoaffective disorder, but only one completed study of the use of paliperidone palmitate, which demonstrated efficacy in preventing relapse. Three other studies are currently recruiting participants. Efficacy and tolerability were similar to the profile of oral paliperidone in the treatment of individuals with schizophrenia. These results were similar for both individuals treated with paliperidone palmitate alone, and for those treated with paliperidone palmitate with adjunctive mood stabilizers and/or antidepressants. The use of paliperidone palmitate does not require initial co-administration of oral paliperidone, has relatively little risk of drug-drug interactions, and its pharmacokinetics are favorable for once-monthly administration, an important treatment option for individuals with psychotic disorders, who may often be non-adherent to effective medication regimens. CONCLUSION: Paliperidone palmitate is an approved treatment for schizoaffective disorder, and can be efficacious with or without commonly employed adjunctive treatments.

Effects of paliperidone extended release on functioning level and symptoms of patients with recent onset schizophrenia: An open-label, single-arm, flexible-dose, 12-months follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Response to antipsychotic treatment is better in the early stages of schizophrenia. AIMS: The primary objective of this non-randomized, single-arm, multicenter clinical trial was to explore the response to treatment and safety of a flexible dose of paliperidone (mean = 6.42 mg/day) in patients with recent onset schizophrenia (< 3 years after the first episode/hospitalization). METHODS: Severity of clinical symptoms was evaluated by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), functioning was assessed using the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale and the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). RESULTS: In a total of 85 patients enrolled, 80 patients were eligible. Total PSP score at baseline (50.2 ± 11.6) increased at all visits. Total PSP score was 65.4 ± 12.1 at month 12 (P < 0.001). GAF scores were significantly higher at all visits compared with baseline (P = 0.001). It was 62.4 ± 12.5 with an increase of 42.9% at month 12 (P < 0.001). PANSS Positive and Negative subscales and General psychopathology subscale scores showed significant reductions beginning with month 3 and were 11.9 ± 3.8 (29.3%; P < 0.001), 13.7 ± 5.6 (27.3% P < 0.001) and 27.8 ± 7.1 (23.2%; P < 0.001) at month 12, respectively. Twelve patients (14.3%) had a serious adverse event. The most common adverse events were insomnia (17.9%), nausea (8.3%), akathisia (4.8%), anxiety (4.8%) and depression (4.8%). Body weight values at the end of the study were significantly higher compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that flexible dose of paliperidone resulted in a significant improvement in functioning and reduction in symptoms in patients with recent onset schizophrenia.

Clinical effectiveness and resource utilization of paliperidone ER for schizophrenia: Pharmacoepidemiologic International Longitudinal Antipsychotic Registry (PILAR).

OBJECTIVE: To document prescribing patterns in clinical practice and assess long-term outcomes related to initiation of paliperidone ER and other oral antipsychotics among patients with schizophrenia in a naturalistic setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: An international, non-interventional, naturalistic study of adult patients (≥18 years) with schizophrenia. Patients were assigned to the relevant treatment group (paliperidone ER or 'all other oral antipsychotics') after switching to, or initiating, oral antipsychotic treatment. Retrospective 12 month data collection was followed by 12 month prospective data collection, with 3-monthly assessments. The primary endpoint was time to all-cause discontinuation of new medication. Secondary endpoints included Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) score, Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH) score, Personal and Social Performance (PSP) score, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and quality of sleep, evaluation of healthcare resource utilization and patient's treatment satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 4051 patients were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set. All-cause study discontinuation rates were comparable between the paliperidone ER group (16.8%) and the 'all other oral antipsychotics' group (15.5%). There was no difference in the time to discontinuation of newly initiated antipsychotic treatments between paliperidone ER and 'all other oral antipsychotics' groups. Paliperidone ER was associated with greater improvements from baseline to endpoint in both the PSP scale score (+14.2 vs +13.1, p = 0.041) and the physical component of quality of life (SF-12 Physical scores; +3.9 vs +2.9, p = 0.003) compared to 'all other oral antipsychotics'. Improvements in mean CGI-S score, CGI-SCH score, HR-QoL, quality of sleep and daytime drowsiness, as well as patients' treatment satisfaction were comparable between treatment groups. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable data on the prescribing habits and treatment outcomes associated with use of paliperidone ER in everyday clinical practice, and supports previous findings of the favorable functional improvement and treatment satisfaction associated with paliperidone ER. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00696813; R076477SCH4015 (Register of German Association of Research-based Pharmaceutical Companies [VFA] http://www.vfa.de/de/arzneimittel-forschung/datenbanken-zu-arzneimitteln/nisdb).

Treatment of acute schizophrenia with paliperidone ER: predictors for treatment response and benzodiazepine use.

The Paliperidone ER Treatment in Acute Intervention (PERTAIN) study was designed to explore treatment response, tolerability, and safety of flexible doses of paliperidone ER in patients with schizophrenia admitted for an acute exacerbation. This paper addresses a secondary analysis of PERTAIN data designed to explore predictors for treatment response, flexible dosing, and concomitant benzodiazepine use. This prospective, multicenter, phase 3b, open-label, single-arm, 6-week study used flexible doses of paliperidone ER (3 to 12mg once daily) to treat patients hospitalized for an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia, reflecting more closely daily clinical practice. Predictive models were evaluated for paliperidone ER flexible dosing, treatment response, and concomitant treatment with benzodiazepines as distinct independent variables. For the analysis of explanatory variables, a stepwise logistic regression was used, taking into account patient age, gender, body mass index, diagnosis and duration of schizophrenia, number of prior hospitalizations, psychotic symptoms (PANSS), disease severity (CGI-S), and patient functioning (PSP) at baseline. Early response (defined as response within 2weeks of treatment initiation) was also used as a predictor. Clinical response (defined as ≥30% decrease in PANSS total score and ≥1 point decrease in CGI-S from baseline to endpoint) was predicted by early clinical response (p<0.001) and there was a trend for the diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia vs. other types of schizophrenia to predict clinical response (p=0.0525). High response (defined as ≥50% decrease in PANSS total score and ≥2 points decrease in CGI-S from baseline to endpoint) was predicted by early high response, higher baseline CGI-S, or female gender. More severely ill patients with a higher baseline CGI-S were twice likely to be treated concomitantly with a benzodiazepine.

Safety of paliperidone extended-release in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and hepatic disease.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Patients with schizophrenia often suffer from comorbid hepatic disease. This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, crossover study evaluated the safety and efficacy of paliperidone extended-release (ER) in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and hepatic disease. METHODS: The study comprised a screening period, followed by 9 weeks' open-label treatment, divided into 2 phases. Phase 1 (4 weeks) was a continuation of usual antipsychotic treatment (UAT); phase 2 (5 weeks) consisted of a 1-week cross-titration from UAT to flexibly dosed paliperidone ER (3-12 mg/d), followed by 4 weeks of paliperidone ER alone. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including those considered more relevant to antipsychotic treatment (prespecified adverse events [AEs]), were analyzed. RESULTS: Although more subjects reported TEAEs during the paliperidone ER alone period than during the UAT period, no significant differences occurred in prespecified AE rates. No new safety signals were detected, and minimal shifts in liver function test values were observed. Improvements in psychiatric symptoms and functioning were observed after 4 weeks' paliperidone ER treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that paliperidone ER is well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and hepatic disease. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest prospective study to date in this population.

Influencing Factors and Predictors of Early Response in Schizophrenia Patients Receiving the Paliperidone Extended-Release Tablets (Paliperidone ER).

OBJECTIVE: Paliperidone extended-release tablet (paliperidone ER) is a new oral psychotropic agent developed for schizophrenia treatment. There have been some studies about paliperidone's good efficacy and tolerability. Clinicians appear to change the antipsychotic medication to paliperidone ER. However, it is not known what patients are favorable responsive to paliperidone ER. The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of early responders and investigate predictors of acute response when the medications changed to paliperidone ER. METHODS: Data were analyzed from schizophrenic patients who participated in a multi-center, open-label, non-comparative clinical trial. Total 320 patients were examined in this study. Sociodemographic, psychopathology, social function and metabolic data were evaluated. Unpaired t-test for continuous and χ(2) for categorical data, respectively, were used to compare early responder and non-responders. Logistic regression analysis was used to establish a prediction model. RESULTS: 38.7% of study subjects (124 of 320) responded to paliperidone ER treatment. Logistic regression analysis showed that a good paliperidone ER response was more likely when patients were social drinkers, when patients had started medication at inpatient, when negative symptoms were less severe, and when patients' social relationship and self-care were better. CONCLUSION: Early response to paliperidone ER treatment is associated with less negative symptoms and good social relationships and self-care. Strategies to reduce these symptoms may contribute to early response to paliperidone ER.

Influencing Factors and Predictors of Early Response in Schizophrenia Patients Receiving the Paliperidone Extended-Release Tablets (Paliperidone ER)

OBJECTIVE: Paliperidone extended-release tablet (paliperidone ER) is a new oral psychotropic agent developed for schizophrenia treatment. There have been some studies about paliperidone's good efficacy and tolerability. Clinicians appear to change the antipsychotic medication to paliperidone ER. However, it is not known what patients are favorable responsive to paliperidone ER. The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of early responders and investigate predictors of acute response when the medications changed to paliperidone ER. METHODS: Data were analyzed from schizophrenic patients who participated in a multi-center, open-label, non-comparative clinical trial. Total 320 patients were examined in this study. Sociodemographic, psychopathology, social function and metabolic data were evaluated. Unpaired t-test for continuous and chi2 for categorical data, respectively, were used to compare early responder and non-responders. Logistic regression analysis was used to establish a prediction model. RESULTS: 38.7% of study subjects (124 of 320) responded to paliperidone ER treatment. Logistic regression analysis showed that a good paliperidone ER response was more likely when patients were social drinkers, when patients had started medication at inpatient, when negative symptoms were less severe, and when patients' social relationship and self-care were better. CONCLUSION: Early response to paliperidone ER treatment is associated with less negative symptoms and good social relationships and self-care. Strategies to reduce these symptoms may contribute to early response to paliperidone ER.

Tolerability, Safety and Effectiveness of Paliperidone ER in Patients with Schizophrenia : A 24-Week Interim Analysis of the 48-Week Open-Label, Prospective, Switch Study

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the tolerability, safety, and treatment response to flexible-dose paliperidone ER in patients with non-acute schizophrenia in whom previous antipsychotic drugs were ineffective. METHODS: This 24-week interim analysis of the 48-week multicenter, prospective, open-label study assessed effectiveness using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia-Severity (CGI-SCH-S) Scale, Personal and Social Performance (PSP) and Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI). Safety and tolerability were assessed using the Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS) and Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side Effect Rating Scale (LUNSERS). RESULTS: Effectiveness was assessed in 169 patients. Significant improvement in the PANSS total score was observed by week-1 and continued until week-24. The response rate was 33%. The CGI-SCH-S and PSP total scores significantly improved during 24 weeks ; however, no change occurred in the total DAI. Fifty-nine percent of patients reported adverse events, of which extrapyramidal symptoms were the most frequent (19.0%). The DIEPSS and LUNSERS scores were improved after 24 week. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to the flexible-dose paliperidone ER from an ineffective antipsychotic drug was safe, tolerable, and showed a good treatment response in Korean patients with schizophrenia.

The role of paliperidone extended release for the treatment of bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic, relapsing, episodic mental illness associated with other psychiatric comorbidities. There is a substantial economic burden with BD, which makes it challenging to treat. The aim of this review is to evaluate the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety data related to paliperidone extended release (ER) for the treatment of BD. METHODS: A literature search was performed from January 1966 through January 2012 using PreMEDLINE, MEDLINE, EMBASE, IPA, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify articles in English regarding the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of paliperidone ER in acute mania or mixed episodes or in the maintenance treatment of BD I. RESULTS: There are currently three published studies relating to the use of paliperidone ER for the treatment of BD. Two of these evaluated paliperidone ER as monotherapy for acute mania, while the other assessed its role as adjunct with a mood stabilizer. CONCLUSION: According to the limited available evidence, paliperidone at higher doses of ER 9-12 mg/day may be a safe and efficacious treatment option for acute episodes of mania in BD. A once-daily dose formulation may improve patient adherence to treatment; however, the cost of paliperidone ER, which is higher than that of generically available second-generation antipsychotics (such as olanzapine and risperidone), and a lack of alternative dosage forms (ie, liquid, intramuscular) compared with other agents may limit its usefulness in the treatment of BD. The role of paliperidone ER as an adjunctive agent or for long-term use requires further investigation.

[Study of Flexible Doses of Paliperidone ER in Pacients with Schizophrenia who Have Undergone Inefficient Treatment with other Antipsychotics]. / Estudio de dosis flexibles de paliperidona ER en pacientes con esquizofrenia previamente tratados sin efectividad con otros antipsicóticos.

BACKGROUND: Extended-release (ER) paliperidone is an innovative atypical antipsychotic that allows minimal peak-to-through fluctuations with once-daily dosing. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectiveness, safety and tolerability of flexible, once-daily doses of paliperidone ER (3-12 mg/day) in patients with schizophrenia from Argentina and Colombia who had previously failed treatment with other antipsychotic agents. METHODS: The authors conducted a 6-month, open-label, prospective and multicentric study. Effectiveness was assessed with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP). Other measures of effectiveness, safety and tolerability, were also conducted. RESULTS: Paliperidone ER 3-12 mg/day improved Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores (primary endpoint) from baseline to study end (p < 0,001). In the PANSS total score, the mean change from baseline (83, 9 units) to end point (53,7 units) was significant (p < 0,001). Flexible doses of paliperidone ER demonstrated a ≥20% reduction in the PANSS total score (p<0.001) in almost two-thirds of patients. PSP mean change from baseline (52 units) to end point (85 units) was significant (p < 0,001). Secondary effectiveness assessments, as well as safety and tolerability measures, demonstrated favourable results throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible doses of paliperidone ER over 6 months were effective, safe and well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia from Argentina and Colombia.

An Open Label Multi-Center Prospective Observational Study of Paliperidone Extended Release to Assess the Medication Satisfaction and Treatment Response in Patients with Schizophrenia / 대한정신약물학회지

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate changes of subjective medication satisfaction and clinical benefit after once-daily paliperidone extended release (ER) in treatment of schizophrenia. METHODS: In an open-label, observational, and multicenter study, 374 patients with schizophrenia who switched to paliperidone ER due to any reason were recruited. Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ), Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement and visual analogue scale for sleep (VAS) were assessed at baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment. We also examined the type, frequency, and severity of adverse events newly formed. RESULTS: Among 374 patients, 320 patients (76.5%) were included in the intent-to-treat analysis set. The mean dose of paliperidone ER was 5.33+/-2.31 mg/day at the initiation. At the endpoint, the mean dose of paliperidone ER was 6.68+/-3.13 mg/day. The percentages of patients satisfied with medication were changed from 40.9% at baseline to 67.8% at endpoint (p<0.001). Both CGI-S scores and VAS for daytime drowsiness were significantly decreased after 8 weeks (both p<0.0001) and mean scores of MSQ and VAS for sleep quality were improved after 8 weeks (both p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: After switching to paliperidone ER, 67.8% of patients with schizophrenia who had any reason to switch medication showed subjective satisfaction for medication and clinical improvement without significant adverse events. Regarding that medication satisfaction was associated with changes of clinical states, medication satisfaction can be used for measures for clinical scales in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Efficacy and Safety of Paliperidone Extended Release in Schizophrenia Patients Requiring a Switch in Antipsychotic Medication by Switching Previous Antipsychotics to Paliperidone Extended Release / 대한정신약물학회지

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of paliperidone extended release (ER) in patients with schizophrenia by switching previous antipsychotics to paliperidone ER. METHODS: An open-label, 24 weeks, prospective, non-comparative, multi-center study evaluated total 387 patients with schizophrenia requiring a switch in antipsychotic medication due to suboptimal efficacy, intolerability, and non-compliance. Patients were switched to flexible-dose trial of paliperidone ER (3-12 mg/day). Efficacy was measured by Krawiecka Scale, Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia-Severity (CGI-SCH-S), Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia-Improvement (CGI-SCH-I), sleep visual analog scale (VAS), and Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), evaluation of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) using the Drug Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS), and laboratory tests. RESULTS: Data from a total of 321 subjects who took the paliperidone ER and had at least one follow-up assessment without a major protocol violation were analyzed. Switching to paliperidone ER led to a significant improvement in the Krawiecka, CGI-SCH-S, CGI-SCH-I, PSP, and DIEPSS scales. However, serum prolactin levels and metabolic parameters including body weight and waist circumference were significantly increased. Insomnia was the most common adverse event. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that patients with schizophrenia who showed insufficient response or intolerance to other previous antipsychotics can be switched to paliperidone ER, with efficacy, safety, and tolerability.

Direct and indirect effects of paliperidone extended-release tablets on negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Direct and indirect effects of the new psychotropic paliperidone extended-release (paliperidone ER) tablets on negative symptom improvement in schizophrenia were investigated using path analysis. A post hoc analysis of pooled data from three 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of paliperidone ER in patients experiencing acute exacerbation was conducted. Regression analysis explored relationships between baseline/study characteristics and negative symptoms. Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative factor score at endpoint was the dependent variable; explanatory variables included demographic and clinical characteristics. Path analysis determined direct and indirect effects of treatment on negative symptom change. Indirect mediators of negative symptom change in the model included changes in positive symptoms, anxiety/depression symptoms and movement disorders. Path analysis indicated that up to 33% of negative symptom improvement was a direct treatment effect. Indirect effects on negative symptoms were mediated through changes in positive symptoms (51%) and anxiety/depression symptoms (18%), whereas changes in movement disorders had a 2.1% inverse effect. Path analysis indicated that paliperidone ER has a direct effect on negative symptoms. Negative symptom improvement also was indirectly mediated via changes in positive and depressive symptoms.