Tuberculosis and Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Anti-TNFα Treatment: Insights From a French Multicenter Study and Systematic Literature Review With Emphasis on Paradoxical Anti-TNFα Resumption.

Background: The advent of anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) has revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, susceptibility to active tuberculosis (TB) is associated with this therapy and requires its discontinuation. The risk of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in this population is poorly understood, as is the safety of resuming anti-TNFα. Methods: This French retrospective study (2010-2022) included all TB cases in patients with IBD who were treated with anti-TNFα in 6 participating centers. A systematic literature review was performed on TB-IRIS and anti-TNFα exposure. Results: Thirty-six patients were included (median age, 35 years; IQR, 27-48). TB was disseminated in 86% and miliary in 53%. IRIS occurred in 47% after a median 45 days (IQR, 18-80). Most patients with TB-IRIS (93%) had disseminated TB. Miliary TB was associated with IRIS risk in univariate analysis (odds ratio, 7.33; 95% CI, 1.60-42.82; P = .015). Anti-TB treatment was longer in this population (median [IQR], 9 [9-12] vs 6 [6-9] months; P = .049). Anti-TNFα was resumed in 66% after a median 4 months (IQR, 3-10) for IBD activity (76%) or IRIS treatment (24%), with only 1 case of TB relapse. Fifty-two cases of TB-IRIS in patients treated with anti-TNFα were reported in the literature, complicating disseminating TB (85%) after a median 42 days (IQR, 21-90), with 70% requiring anti-inflammatory treatment. Forty cases of TB-IRIS or paradoxical reaction treated with anti-TNFα were also reported. IRIS was neurologic in 64%. Outcome was mostly favorable (93% recovery). Conclusions: TB with anti-TNFα treatment is often complicated by IRIS of varying severity. Restarting anti-TNFα is a safe and effective strategy.

Post-tuberculosis treatment paradoxical reactions.

Paradoxical reactions (PR) to tuberculosis (TB) treatment are common during treatment, but have also been described after treatment. A presentation with recurrent signs or symptoms of TB after cure or completion of prior treatment needs to be differentiated between microbiological relapse and a paradoxical reaction. We searched all published literature on post-treatment PR, and present a synthesis of 30 studies, focusing on the epidemiology, diagnosis and management of this phenomenon. We report an additional case vignette. The majority of studies were of lymph node TB (LN-TB), followed by central nervous system TB (CNS-TB). A total of 112 confirmed and 42 possible post-treatment PR cases were reported. The incidence ranged between 3 and 14% in LN-TB and was more frequent than relapses, and between 0 and 2% in all TB. We found four reports of pulmonary or pleural TB post-treatment PR cases. The incidence did not differ by length of treatment, but was associated with younger age at initial diagnosis, and having had a PR (later) during treatment. Post-treatment PR developed mainly within the first 6 months after the end of TB treatment but has been reported many years later (longest report 10 years). The mainstays of diagnosis and management are negative mycobacterial cultures and anti-inflammatory treatment, respectively. Due to the favourable prognosis in LN-TB recurrent symptoms, a short period of observation is warranted to assess for spontaneous regression. In CNS-TB with recurrent symptoms, immediate investigation and anti-inflammatory treatment with the possibility of TB retreatment should be undertaken.

(Re-)introduction of TNF antagonists and JAK inhibitors in patients with previous tuberculosis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is a common complication associated with treatment with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. However, there is uncertainty about the risk of TB relapse in patients with TB and comorbidities requiring treatment with these agents. OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of TB relapse in patients (re-)started on TNF antagonists or JAK inhibitors. METHODS: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Cochrane Library databases until 11 December 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case reports and case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with current or previous TB who were (re-)started on TNF antagonists or JAK inhibitors. INTERVENTIONS: (Re-)introduction of TNF antagonists and JAK inhibitors. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: All studies meeting entry criteria were included regardless of quality. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Categorical data are presented as frequencies and percentages. For non-normally distributed aggregated data, we calculated the pooled weighted median with 95% CI. For individual patient data, the median and interquartile range (IQR) were calculated. RESULTS: Of 5018 articles screened for eligibility, 67 publications reporting on 368 TB patients who (re-)initiated treatment with TNF antagonists for underlying diseases were included. The median age was 42.5 years (95% CI: 40.4-42.5) and the proportion of female patients was 36.6% (n = 74) of patients whose sex was reported. A total of 14 patients (3.8%, 95% CI: 2.1-6.3%) developed TB relapse after a median of 8.5 months (interquartile range, 6.8-14.8 months) following (re-)initiation of anti-TNF treatment. Furthermore, among 251 articles screened for eligibility, 11 reports on TB patients who were (re-)started on JAK inhibitors for underlying diseases were identified. The median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 48.5-68.5 years) and 45.5% (n = 5) were female. Only one patient (9.1%; 95% CI: 0.2-41.3%) had TB reactivation 10 months after starting treatment with ruxolitinib. In addition, 94 patients who were treated with TNF antagonists and two patients temporarily treated with JAK inhibitors for the prevention or treatment of paradoxical reactions were analysed. None of the publications reported microbiological failure or worsening of TB-related symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: (Re-)initiation of TNF antagonists and JAK inhibitors may be relatively safe in patients with current or previous TB and the need for further treatment of underlying diseases.

A teenage girl with altered mental status and paraparesis.

A teenage girl presented with fever and altered mental status. MRI showed diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement of the brain and spine. She was diagnosed by a positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture with tuberculous (TB) meningitis and was started on anti-TB medications and corticosteroids. Her mental status improved, but she was noted to have proximal weakness of the lower extremities. In the course of tapering corticosteroids at week 11 of anti-TB therapy, she became acutely confused and febrile. MRI demonstrated interval development of tuberculomas in the brain and a mass lesion in the thoracic spine causing cord compression. Given the clinical picture was suggestive of a paradoxical reaction, the dose of corticosteroids was increased. Infliximab was added when repeat MRI revealed enlargement of the mass lesion in the spine with worsening cord compression. She was successfully tapered off of corticosteroids. Over several months, the patient's motor function recovered fully, and she returned to ambulating without assistance.

Application of JAK inhibitors in paradoxical reaction through immune-related dermatoses.

Biologics play a positive and effective role in the treatment of immune-related dermatoses. However, many other immune-related diseases have also manifested along with biologics treatment. Paradoxical reaction through immune-related dermatoses refer to the new onset or exacerbation of other immune-mediated dermatoses (mainly psoriasis and atopic dermatitis) after biologics treatment of inflammatory dermatoses (mainly psoriasis and atopic dermatitis), such as new atopic dermatitis (AD) in psoriasis (PsO) treatment and new PsO in AD treatment. A common genetic background and Inflammatory pathway are possible pathogenesis. Faced with paradoxical reactions, the choice of therapy needs to be directed toward therapies effective for both diseases, such as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. The Janus kinase and signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway plays an important role in the inflammatory pathway, and has been widely used in the treatment of AD and PsO in recent years. This article focuses on JAK inhibitors such as tofacitinib, baricitinib, ruxolitinib, Abrocitinib, upadacitinib, and deucravacitinib, to explore the possible application in treatment of paradoxical reactions. Common side effects, baseline risk factors and safety use of JAK inhibitors were discussed.

Local injection of micro-dose guselkumab for palmoplantar pustulosis after partial failure of systemic ixekizumab treatment.

We present a palmoplantar pustulosis case partially resistant to systemic IL-17A inhibitor (ixekizumab) treatment, and then receiving a local injection of 0.1 mL micro-dose (1 mg) IL-23 inhibitor (guselkumab) every 4 weeks for four times. The paradoxical lesion disappeared rapidly following local injection and there was no recurrence after 8 weeks of drug withdrawal. This is the first clinical report on the treatment of palmoplantar pustulosis by local injection of micro-dose guselkumab.

Efectos adversos cutáneos inmunomediados por los anti-TNF: revisión de 30 casos / Immune-Mediated Skin Reactions to Tumor Necrosis α Inhibitors: A Review of 30 Cases

Introducción Los fármacos biológicos inhibidores del factor de necrosis tumoral (TNF) alfa son usados para tratar diferentes enfermedades inflamatorias. A pesar de su adecuado perfil de seguridad, se han descrito reacciones paradójicas asociadas a estos tratamientos. Material y método Se ha realizado una revisión retrospectiva de los pacientes en tratamiento con un anti-TNF que hubiesen presentado una reacción paradójica con afectación cutánea visitados en el Servicio de Dermatología del Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí de Sabadell. Resultados Registramos 30 pacientes en tratamiento con un anti-TNF que desarrollaron un efecto adverso cutáneo inmunomediado en forma de psoriasis (90%), alopecia (6,7%) o dermatitis neutrofílica (3,3%). Adalimumab fue el fármaco más implicado (56,7%), seguido de infliximab (40%). La morfología de la reacción psoriasiforme más descrita es la generalizada en placas (62,9%), seguida de la pustulosis palmo-plantar (37%). El 43,3% de los pacientes mantuvieron el anti-TNF, y de ellos el 92,3% obtuvieron una resolución total y parcial. De los 5 pacientes que iniciaron otro anti-TNF, ninguno obtuvo una resolución total. De los 8 pacientes que cambiaron a un tratamiento biológico diferente al anti-TNF, el 62,5% obtuvieron una resolución total o parcial. Discusión La aparición de una reacción paradójica no siempre obliga al cambio de tratamiento biológico, puesto que se ha observado la resolución de las lesiones cutáneas con un tratamiento tópico y/o sistémico adicional en más de la mitad de los pacientes, sin necesidad de suspender el anti-TNF. Si la afectación es grave, se debe plantear el cambio de tratamiento biológico, siendo más eficaz iniciar un fármaco dirigido a una diana terapéutica distinta al anti-TNF (AU)

Background Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) inhibitors are used to treat different inflammatory diseases. Although these biologics have an adequate safety profile, they have been associated with paradoxical reactions. Material and methods Retrospective review of patients on TNF inhibitor therapy who developed a paradoxical skin reaction and were seen at the dermatology department of Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí in Sabadell, Spain. Results We collected data on 30 patients under treatment with a TNF inhibitor who developed an immune-mediated skin reaction in the form of psoriasis (90%), alopecia (6.7%), or neutrophilic dermatitis (3.3%). The most common drugs involved were adalimumab (56.7%) and infliximab (40%). Psoriasiform reactions mostly manifested as generalized plaques (62.9%) or palmoplantar pustulosis (37%). Thirteen patients (43.3%) continued on the same TNF inhibitor and 12 of them (92.3%) achieved partial or complete resolution of lesions. Five patients were switched to a different TNF inhibitor, but none of them achieved complete resolution. Eight patients were switched to a biologic with a different target, and 5 of them (62.5%) achieved partial or complete resolution. Conclusions Paradoxical reactions during TNF inhibitor therapy do not always require a change of treatment. In our series, the addition of a topical and/or systemic treatment resolved the skin lesions in more than half of the patients, and switching to a drug with a different target was more effective. A change of strategy should be contemplated in more serious cases (AU)

[Translated article] Immune-Mediated Skin Reactions to Tumor Necrosis α Inhibitors: A Review of 30 Cases / Efectos adversos cutáneos inmunomediados por los anti-TNF: revisión de 30 casos

Background Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) inhibitors are used to treat different inflammatory diseases. Although these biologics have an adequate safety profile, they have been associated with paradoxical reactions. Material and methods Retrospective review of patients on TNF inhibitor therapy who developed a paradoxical skin reaction and were seen at the dermatology department of Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí in Sabadell, Spain. Results We collected data on 30 patients under treatment with a TNF inhibitor who developed an immune-mediated skin reaction in the form of psoriasis (90%), alopecia (6.7%), or neutrophilic dermatitis (3.3%). The most common drugs involved were adalimumab (56.7%) and infliximab (40%). Psoriasiform reactions mostly manifested as generalized plaques (62.9%) or palmoplantar pustulosis (37%). Thirteen patients (43.3%) continued on the same TNF inhibitor and 12 of them (92.3%) achieved partial or complete resolution of lesions. Five patients were switched to a different TNF inhibitor, but none of them achieved complete resolution. Eight patients were switched to a biologic with a different target, and 5 of them (62.5%) achieved partial or complete resolution. Conclusions Paradoxical reactions during TNF inhibitor therapy do not always require a change of treatment. In our series, the addition of a topical and/or systemic treatment resolved the skin lesions in more than half of the patients, and switching to a drug with a different target was more effective. A change of strategy should be contemplated in more serious cases (AU)

Introducción Los fármacos biológicos inhibidores del factor de necrosis tumoral (TNF) alfa son usados para tratar diferentes enfermedades inflamatorias. A pesar de su adecuado perfil de seguridad, se han descrito reacciones paradójicas asociadas a estos tratamientos. Material y método Se ha realizado una revisión retrospectiva de los pacientes en tratamiento con un anti-TNF que hubiesen presentado una reacción paradójica con afectación cutánea visitados en el Servicio de Dermatología del Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí de Sabadell. Resultados Registramos 30 pacientes en tratamiento con un anti-TNF que desarrollaron un efecto adverso cutáneo inmunomediado en forma de psoriasis (90%), alopecia (6,7%) o dermatitis neutrofílica (3,3%). Adalimumab fue el fármaco más implicado (56,7%), seguido de infliximab (40%). La morfología de la reacción psoriasiforme más descrita es la generalizada en placas (62,9%), seguida de la pustulosis palmo-plantar (37%). El 43,3% de los pacientes mantuvieron el anti-TNF, y de ellos el 92,3% obtuvieron una resolución total y parcial. De los 5 pacientes que iniciaron otro anti-TNF, ninguno obtuvo una resolución total. De los 8 pacientes que cambiaron a un tratamiento biológico diferente al anti-TNF, el 62,5% obtuvieron una resolución total o parcial. Discusión La aparición de una reacción paradójica no siempre obliga al cambio de tratamiento biológico, puesto que se ha observado la resolución de las lesiones cutáneas con un tratamiento tópico y/o sistémico adicional en más de la mitad de los pacientes, sin necesidad de suspender el anti-TNF. Si la afectación es grave, se debe plantear el cambio de tratamiento biológico, siendo más eficaz iniciar un fármaco dirigido a una diana terapéutica distinta al anti-TNF (AU)

[Paradoxical tuberculosis reaction]. / Réaction paradoxale tuberculeuse.

Paradoxical tuberculosis reaction is defined as the aggravation of lesions present at diagnosis or the development of new lesions under anti-tuberculosis treatment, after exclusion of other alternate causes. It affects 5 to 30% of tuberculosis patients, with a variable prevalence depending on the site of infection and the clinical background. The diagnosis of paradoxical reaction is one of elimination, and requires having ruled out therapeutic failure, notably linked to poor compliance and/or to the presence of mycobacterial antibiotic resistance. The severity of paradoxical tuberculosis reaction lies in its neurological impairment. Despite its clinical importance, the mechanisms involved remain poorly understood and its management is not consensual. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone in the medical management. The role of anti-TNF agents, currently proposed in cases of corticodependence or corticoresistance, remains to be properly defined.

Immune-Mediated Skin Reactions to Tumor Necrosis α Inhibitors: A Review of 30 Cases. / Efectos adversos cutáneos inmunomediados por los anti-TNF: revisión de 30 casos.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) inhibitors are used to treat different inflammatory diseases. Although these biologics have an adequate safety profile, they have been associated with paradoxical reactions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients on TNF inhibitor therapy who developed a paradoxical skin reaction and were seen at the dermatology department of Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí in Sabadell, Spain. RESULTS: We collected data on 30 patients under treatment with a TNF inhibitor who developed an immune-mediated skin reaction in the form of psoriasis (90%), alopecia (6.7%), or neutrophilic dermatitis (3.3%). The most common drugs involved were adalimumab (56.7%) and infliximab (40%). Psoriasiform reactions mostly manifested as generalized plaques (62.9%) or palmoplantar pustulosis (37%). Thirteen patients (43.3%) continued on the same TNF inhibitor and 12 of them (92.3%) achieved partial or complete resolution of lesions. Five patients were switched to a different TNF inhibitor, but none of them achieved complete resolution. Eight patients were switched to a biologic with a different target, and 5 of them (62.5%) achieved partial or complete resolution. CONCLUSIONS: Paradoxical reactions during TNF inhibitor therapy do not always require a change of treatment. In our series, the addition of a topical and/or systemic treatment resolved the skin lesions in more than half of the patients, and switching to a drug with a different target was more effective. A change of strategy should be contemplated in more serious cases.

Prolonged paradoxical reaction requiring over 5 years of corticosteroid administration in a patient with severe tuberculous meningitis.

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is a rare disease in low-incidence countries like Japan, where general physicians have fewer experience with TBM. Despite its proper treatment and early improvement of the condition, TBM often causes paradoxical reactions (PRs), which can lead to severe complications such as stroke. As PRs in the brain are difficult to detect without regular neuroimaging surveillance and have a later onset than in other organs, delayed treatment can be fatal. We report a case of a 54-year-old, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative man who presented with TBM and miliary tuberculosis (TB) in an unconscious state. Standard anti-tuberculous therapy with adjunctive systemic high-dose dexamethasone brought rapid clinical and microbiological improvement, which allowed the dexamethasone to be tapered. However, he developed cerebral infarction with left hemiplegia due to a TBM-related PR five months after admission. Therefore, the initial high-dose dexamethasone was again added to the anti-tuberculous drugs, achieving the significant effects on the PR-related lesions. Anti-tuberculous drugs had been administered for 3 years and the dexamethasone was carefully tapered. Nevertheless, enlargement of PR-related lesions in the brain recurred 5 years later. Accordingly, the dose of corticosteroid was again increased, resulting in resolving the lesions. It is important to note that severe TBM may cause prolonged PRs, which require a long-term neuroimaging follow-up and anti-inflammatory drugs for the successful management of the TBM-related PR.

[Translated article] Immune-Mediated Skin Reactions to Tumor Necrosis α Inhibitors: A Review of 30 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) inhibitors are used to treat different inflammatory diseases. Although these biologics have an adequate safety profile, they have been associated with paradoxical reactions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients on TNF inhibitor therapy who developed a paradoxical skin reaction and were seen at the dermatology department of Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí in Sabadell, Spain. RESULTS: We collected data on 30 patients under treatment with a TNF inhibitor who developed an immune-mediated skin reaction in the form of psoriasis (90%), alopecia (6.7%), or neutrophilic dermatitis (3.3%). The most common drugs involved were adalimumab (56.7%) and infliximab (40%). Psoriasiform reactions mostly manifested as generalized plaques (62.9%) or palmoplantar pustulosis (37%). Thirteen patients (43.3%) continued on the same TNF inhibitor and 12 of them (92.3%) achieved partial or complete resolution of lesions. Five patients were switched to a different TNF inhibitor, but none of them achieved complete resolution. Eight patients were switched to a biologic with a different target, and 5 of them (62.5%) achieved partial or complete resolution. CONCLUSIONS: Paradoxical reactions during TNF inhibitor therapy do not always require a change of treatment. In our series, the addition of a topical and/or systemic treatment resolved the skin lesions in more than half of the patients, and switching to a drug with a different target was more effective. A change of strategy should be contemplated in more serious cases.

Paradoxical Psoriasis and Worsening Spondylitis Due to Secukinumab in a Patient With Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is an autoimmune disease primarily affecting the axial skeleton, with associated extra-musculoskeletal manifestations. Treatment strategies targeting cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 17 (IL-17) have proven effective. However, paradoxical reactions, including paradoxical psoriasis and arthritis, have been reported in axSpA patients receiving TNF-α inhibitors. IL-17 inhibitors have been used as an alternative treatment option, but paradoxical reactions have also been rarely observed. This case report presents a 45-year-old man with axSpA who responded to infliximab for six years before discontinuing it due to secondary failure. After the washout period of infliximab, he was started on secukinumab but developed paradoxical psoriasis and worsening of inflammatory back pain after receiving the second loading dose which necessitated replacing it with upadacitinib. Complete resolution of paradoxical psoriasis and significant improvement in his back pain after three months ensued. This case contributes to understanding the complex dynamics in treating axSpA and managing paradoxical reactions.

Active anterior rhinomanometry: A study on nasal airway resistance, paradoxical reactions to decongestion, and repeatability in healthy subjects.

Objectives: Anterior active rhinomanometry (AAR) is widely used in Swedish routine clinical practice to decide if septoplasty is necessary. The scientific basis for the method needs to be strengthened. Therefore, the aims were to evaluate nasal airway resistance (NAR), paradoxical reactions to pharmacological decongestion, and test-retest characteristics of the Rhino-Comp® AAR in healthy subjects. Methods: A prospective longitudinal design was used. AAR was performed before and after decongestion at baseline and after ≥6 months on 60 healthy volunteers. The relationships between NAR, height, weight, BMI, sex, and allergic rhinitis were evaluated by regression analyses. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate paradoxical reactions. Test-retest and repeatability characteristics were evaluated with intra-class coefficients (ICC), Cronbach's α, and standard error of measurement. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between genders or nasal cavity sides. NAR was statistically significantly related to height. Short- and long-term test-retest characteristics were good with ICC and Cronbach's α > .75. The minimal significant difference in NAR Log10V2 values between the two measurements was 0.11 and 0.09 (long- and short-term). Paradoxical reactions to pharmacological decongestion were rare, mostly weak, and not evidently reproducible. Conclusion: In this study, we report reference data for healthy subjects, test-retest capabilities, and the minimal relevant difference between two measurements for the Rhino-Comp® AAR, information that is vital and necessary for the appropriate use of AAR in clinical practice. An effective method for pharmacological decongestion is described and recommended for future studies and clinical practice. Paradoxical reactions to pharmacological decongestants exist but maybe without clinical significance. Level of Evidence: NA.

Paradoxical tralokinumab-induced psoriasis in a patient with atopic dermatitis.

Purpose: Although psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD) were for decades considered to be opposing diseases, it is now known that these skin conditions can coexist or even overlap in the same individual. Especially when using modern drugs with targeted IL inhibition, the balance between Th1 and Th2 immunity can be disturbed. In line with it, numerous clinical cases of AD have been induced by antipsoriatic biologics (e.g., TNF-alpha, IL-23, or IL-17 inhibitors), and IL-4-/IL-13 inhibition by dupilumab also resulted in paradoxical psoriasis in patients with AD.Materials and methods: Herein, we describe a case of psoriasis vulgaris in a patient with intrinsic AD after systemic treatment with the anti-IL-13 antibody tralokinumab.Results: We present a 36-years-old male patient with a severe course of an intrinsic atopic dermatitis and dyshidrotic hand eczema. He responded well to the therapy with tralokinumab. However, about 7 months after the start of anti-IL-13 treatment the patient developed psoriasiform lesions. The drug was then discontinued. Currently, the patient is receiving topical therapy with topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors with stable course of psoriasis and AD.Conclusions: This case suggests, that not only a dual IL-4-/IL-13-blockade, but also a selective IL-13-inhibition is able to skew immune responses toward IL-17 cytokine pathway-related disease. However, no clinical scores exist to predict the development of paradoxical psoriasis in patients with AD during therapy with biologics.

Paradoxical Reaction to Antitubercular Treatment in a Case of Tuberculous Meningitis.

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is a challenging disease to treat, as Mycobacterium tuberculosis infects the meninges, which are the outer membranes of the brain and the spinal cord. The majority of patients diagnosed with TBM acquire various other central nervous system complications, and as a result, treating the disease becomes a challenging task. A paradoxical reaction to the treatment may occur in the course of managing TBM. This case study describes a 20-year-old Southeast Asian female who was diagnosed and treated for TBM and subsequently developed a resurgence of the disease due to a paradoxical reaction.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease as a Paradoxical Reaction to Anti-TNF-α Treatment-A Review.

TNF-α inhibitors (TNFis) have revolutionized the treatment of certain chronic immune-mediated diseases, being widely and successfully used in rheumatic inflammatory diseases, and have also proved their efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, among the side effects of these agents are the so-called paradoxical effects. They can be defined as the appearance or exacerbation of a pathological condition that usually responds to this class of drug while treating a patient for another condition. A wide range of paradoxical effects have been reported including dermatological, intestinal and ophthalmic conditions. The causal mechanism of occurrence may implicate an imbalance of cytokines, but is still not fully understood, and remains a matter of debate. These paradoxical reactions often show improvement on discontinuation of the medication or on switching to another TNFi, but in some cases it is a class effect that could lead to the withdrawal of all anti-TNF agents. Close monitoring of patients treated with TNFis is necessary in order to detect paradoxical reactions. In this study we focus on reviewing IBD occurrence as a paradoxical effect of TNFi therapy in patients with rheumatological diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis).

Complicated Surgical Site Infection with Mycobacterium Abscessus After Liposuction and Affections of Corticosteroids in the Treatment Regimen: Three Cases Report and a Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Mycobacterium abscessus infection after liposuction/fat grafting is a rare complication that is hard to diagnose and treat. Misdiagnosis could result in treatment failure and prolonged hospital stays. The paradoxical reaction is another complication that rarely occurs in non-HIV patients infected with nontuberculosis mycobacteria. This study reported 3 cases infected with M. abscessus complicated by the paradoxical reaction after liposuction and fat grafting. It highlighted characteristics giving clues of the paradoxical reaction and a successful strategy. Also, a systematic review was conducted to comprehensively provide varied aspects of M. abscessus infection after liposuction and/or fat grafting. METHODS: Three cases were retrospectively included reporting data characteristics of patients, cosmetic procedures, and treatment strategy. PubMed, Scopus, Virtual Health Library (VHL), and Global Health Library (GHL) were searched to find and include cases with M. abscessus infection after liposuction and/or fat grafting based on defined selection criteria. Relevant data were extracted and summarized. The risk of bias in included studies was assessed using JBI critical appraisal checklists. RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included in the systematic review. Symptoms often developed approximately 1 month after the cosmetic surgery. Culture, AFB, and PCR were common methods of diagnosis of M. abscessus after liposuction and/or fat grafting. It took about 33 days on average from the presentation to isolate and detect the pathogens. Antibiotics based on susceptibility testing results along with surgical interventions were effective methods of treatment. Our three cases which were complicated by the paradox were addressed by adding methylprednisolone for 2 weeks to the macrolide-based therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of this disease should be widely raised among physicians for early diagnosis and proper treatments. Cultures of specimens and AFB should be repeated many times before excluding the possibility of Mycobacterium spp. A paradoxical reaction should be suspected if the symptoms were worse after the antibiotic therapy based on susceptibility testing results and proper surgical interventions, especially if patients had taken corticosteroids before being admitted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .