STEPS (Study To Examine Parent, Patient/Dental Provider Systems) to Prevent Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-Related Cancers: A Piloted Dental Patient and Provider Evaluation of Current and Future HPV Education.

Oropharyngeal human papillomavirus (HPV) cancers are prevalent, but HPV education in dental clinics is uncommon. The purpose of this study was to evaluate dental provider and patient knowledge from, attitudes towards, and preferences for HPV education, then assess perceptions of existing HPV educational materials for use at dental visits. Appalachian Ohio dental patients (n = 13) and general/pediatric dental providers (n = 10) completed an initial, close-ended survey on current HPV knowledge and HPV educational attitudes, participation, and resource preferences. Select individuals reviewed existing HPV educational videos and toolkits via virtual focus groups (n = 9) or independent review surveys (n = 6). Using a discussion guide, participants responded to overall, visual, auditory, and content satisfaction statements, orally (focus groups) or with Likert scales (independent reviews). Surveys were summarized with frequencies/percentages; transcripts were qualitatively coded to identify potential material modifications. Dental providers and patients were more comfortable with HPV and oral cancer education (87% and 96%, respectively) and screening (96%) than with HPV vaccine education (74%) and referrals (61%) during dental visits. Providers were neither sharing HPV educational materials (80%) nor initiating educational conversations with dental patients (100%). The American Cancer Society videos and the "Team Maureen" toolkit were the most liked resources (i.e., fewer negative/disagree statements) by all participant groups. Findings indicate that future dental HPV educational efforts should be informed by currently available materials. Additional interventions are needed to promote dental provider discussions and sharing of educational materials with patients to increase education and promotion of the HPV vaccine and reduce oropharyngeal cancers.

Health Education for Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Not on Dialysis Through the Pictorial Patient Information Leaflet.

Background: Educating the patient with patient information leaflets is helpful to increase understanding and awareness about chronic kidney disease. Various educational materials are available online, but their quality is mixed. The content was found to be unreliable or incomprehensible. Objective: The study aimed to develop, validate, test the readability, translation, and design of the patient information leaflet and focused on assessing patients' knowledge levels using questionnaires after providing the validated patient information leaflet. Methods: A prospective study was conducted among chronic kidney disease patients who were not on dialysis. The patient information leaflet was prepared based on experts' opinions and a thorough review of various resources. Experts validated the content of the patient information leaflet through the content validity index. After being validated, the Baker Able leaflet design scale was used to evaluate the layout and design. Knowledge assessment questions were validated using item-content validity index scores to assess patient knowledge before and after providing the patient information leaflet. Results: A total of 60 randomly selected chronic kidney disease patients were enrolled. The content validity index of the patient information leaflet was found to be 0.9. The Baker Able leaflet design score was found to be 25. Knowledge was assessed and it showed that score had increased from 42 ± 6.95 to 73.5 ± 6.70, respectively, with a P-value <0.000. Conclusion: This study concluded that the patient information leaflet was developed based on standard procedures. Significant improvement was seen in patients' knowledge after utilizing a validated patient information leaflet.

Can we use ChatGPT for Mental Health and Substance Use Education? Examining Its Quality and Potential Harms.

BACKGROUND: The use of generative artificial intelligence, more specifically large language models (LLMs), is proliferating, and as such, it is vital to consider both the value and potential harms of its use in medical education. Their efficiency in a variety of writing styles makes LLMs, such as ChatGPT, attractive for tailoring educational materials. However, this technology can feature biases and misinformation, which can be particularly harmful in medical education settings, such as mental health and substance use education. This viewpoint investigates if ChatGPT is sufficient for 2 common health education functions in the field of mental health and substance use: (1) answering users' direct queries and (2) aiding in the development of quality consumer educational health materials. OBJECTIVE: This viewpoint includes a case study to provide insight into the accessibility, biases, and quality of ChatGPT's query responses and educational health materials. We aim to provide guidance for the general public and health educators wishing to utilize LLMs. METHODS: We collected real world queries from 2 large-scale mental health and substance use portals and engineered a variety of prompts to use on GPT-4 Pro with the Bing BETA internet browsing plug-in. The outputs were evaluated with tools from the Sydney Health Literacy Lab to determine the accessibility, the adherence to Mindframe communication guidelines to identify biases, and author assessments on quality, including tailoring to audiences, duty of care disclaimers, and evidence-based internet references. RESULTS: GPT-4's outputs had good face validity, but upon detailed analysis were substandard in comparison to expert-developed materials. Without engineered prompting, the reading level, adherence to communication guidelines, and use of evidence-based websites were poor. Therefore, all outputs still required cautious human editing and oversight. CONCLUSIONS: GPT-4 is currently not reliable enough for direct-consumer queries, but educators and researchers can use it for creating educational materials with caution. Materials created with LLMs should disclose the use of generative artificial intelligence and be evaluated on their efficacy with the target audience.

Oral health education for systemic sclerosis patients: A booklet report.

Purpose/objectives: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare chronic autoimmune disease characterized by vascular abnormalities and connective tissue disorders. In 2021, the multidisciplinary team of the university hospital recognized a demand for oral health information among SSc patients. This study aims to describe the development of an SSc oral health booklet and its validation by people with SSc. Methods: For the development of the booklet, the project creators employed the action research methodology involving ten stages. SSc patients evaluated the material by filling out a digital form. Results: One hundred and thirty-one people with SSc evaluated the booklet. It received an average score of 9.73 (SD: 0.80) in relevance, 9.82 (SD: 0.47) in explicitness, and 9.49 (SD: 0.93) in aesthetics. The final version was emailed to the participants and posted on social media. Innovation: This is the first booklet that deeply addresses these issues in Portuguese and constitutes a soft technology to instruct and assist patients with SSc. Conclusion: The production of high-quality educational materials on oral health for patients with SSc is necessary. The online distribution increased its reach and had great importance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Efficacy of Three Numerical Presentation Formats on Lay People's Comprehension and Risk Perception of Fact Boxes-A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

(1) Background: Fact boxes present the benefits and harms of medical interventions in the form of tables. Some studies suggest that people with a lower level of education could profit more from graphic presentations. The objective of the study was to compare three different formats in fact boxes with regard to verbatim and gist knowledge in general and according to the educational background. (2) Methods: In May 2020, recruitment started for this randomized controlled trial. Participants were given one out of three presentation formats: natural frequencies, percentages, and graphic. We used Limesurvey® to assess comprehension/risk perception as the primary outcome. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used in addition to descriptive analyses. (3) Results: A total of 227 people took part in the study. Results of the groups were nearly identical in relation to the primary outcome verbatim knowledge, likewise in gist knowledge. However, participants with lower educational qualifications differed from participants with higher educational qualifications in terms of verbatim knowledge in the group percentages. (4) Conclusions: The results indicate that all three forms of presentation are suitable for conveying the content. Further research should take the individual preferences regarding the format into account.

Development and assessment of a low literacy, pictographic asthma action plan with clinical automation to enhance guideline-concordant care for children with asthma.

OBJECTIVE: Asthma is characterized by reversible pulmonary symptoms, frequent hospitalizations, poor quality of life, and varied treatment. Parents with low health literacy (HL) is linked to poor asthma outcomes in children. Recent practice updates recommended inhaled corticosteroids for the management of persistent asthma, but guideline-concordant care is suboptimal. Our aim was to develop and assess an Asthma Action Plan (AAP) that could serve as an individualized plan for low HL families and facilitate guideline-concordant care for clinicians. METHODS: We followed the National Institute of Health 5-step "Clear & Simple" approach to develop the Uniformed Services AAP. Our AAP included symptom pictographs (dyspnea, cough, sleep, activity) and guideline-concordant clinical automation tools. Caregivers assessed the pictograms for validity (transparency of ≥ 85%; translucency score ≥ 5; and ≥ 85% recall). Readability was assessed using 7 formulas. (<6th Grade was acceptable). Comprehensibility, design quality, and usefulness was assessed by caregivers using the Consumer Information Rating Form (CIRF) (>80% was acceptable). Understandability and actionability was assessed by medical librarians using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool-Printable (>80% was acceptable). Suitability was assessed by clinicians using the modified Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) instrument (>70% was superior). RESULTS: All 12 pictograms were validated (N = 118 respondents). Readability demonstrated a 4th grade level. Overall CIRF percentile score = 80.4%. Understandability and Actionability = 100%. Suitability score = 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Our AAP was formally endorsed by the Allergy & Asthma Network. The Uniformed Services AAP is a novel tool with embedded clinical automation that can address low HL and enhance guideline-concordant care.

Development of a Pictorial Patient Education Handout on Tracheostomy Care: A Mixed-Method Study.

This article describes a qualitative and quantitative approach to the development and iterative revision process of producing valid, user-friendly pictorial patient education handouts (infographics) on tracheostomy care. An iterative user-centered design with health professional, patient, and family caregiver panels was used. The authors first developed a new evaluation tool for pictorial education handouts, the Perceived Infographics Usability Measurement (PIUM). The patient education handout, consisting of three A3-size posters with illustrations on key steps of daily tracheostomy care, reached a high consensus among health professional experts (88.3%) and patients and family caregivers (89.1%) on PIUM usability indexes. Patients and family caregivers expressed that the patient education handout would be an understandable teaching tool and procedure reminder, which would help alleviate fears about tracheostomy care. The PIUM demonstrated satisfactory content validity and reliability properties and was a quality tool to guide the transformation of text-based content to a pictorial patient education handout.

The Cleft Lip Education with Augmented Reality (CLEAR) VR Phase 2 Trial: A Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial of a Novel Patient Information Leaflet.

BACKGROUND: The Cleft Lip Education with Augmented Reality (CLEAR) project centers around the use of augmented reality (AR) in patient leaflets, as a visual means to overcome the "health literacy" gap. This trial followed Virtual Reality (VR CORE) guidelines for VR Phase 2 (Pilot) trials. METHODS: Participants included families of children treated for Cleft Lip and Palate at the Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow. Interventions were AR leaflet or Traditional Leaflet. Objectives were to calculate sample sizes, assess outcome instruments, trial design, and acceptability to patients. Primary outcome measure was Mental Effort Rating Scale, and secondary outcomes were Patient Satisfaction (Visual Analogue Scale), Usefulness Scale for Patient Information Material (USE) scale, and Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS). Randomization was by block randomization. The trial was single blinded with assessors blinded to group assignment. RESULTS: 12 Participants were randomized, with crossover design permitting analysis of 12 per group. Primary outcome with Mental Effort Rating Scale indicated higher mental effort with Traditional compared to AR Leaflet (4.75 vs 2.00, P = .0003). Secondary outcomes for Satisfaction were Traditional 54.50 versus AR 93.50 (P = .0001); USE scale 49.42 versus 74.08 (P = .0011); and IMMS 112.50 versus 161.75 (P = .0003). Subjective interviews noted overwhelmingly positive patient comments regarding the AR leaflet. Outcome instruments and trial design were acceptable to participants. No harms were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The CLEAR pilot trial provides early evidence of clinical efficacy of AR leaflets in patient education. It is hoped that this will provide a future paradigm shift in the way patient education is delivered.

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in head and neck cancer: a matched-pair analysis.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to describe the prospective implementation of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol in an Italian tertiary academic centre. Methods: Adult patients receiving surgery for primary or recurrent clinical stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx were enrolled. The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of the ERAS protocol on length of hospital stay (LOS). The secondary objective was to assess its impact on complications. To evaluate the results of the ERAS protocol, a matched-pair analysis was conducted, comparing ERAS patients with comparable cases treated before 2018. Results: Forty ERAS and 40 non-ERAS patients were analysed. There were no significant differences between the cohorts regarding age, gender, stage of disease, comorbidity, ASA score, and duration of surgery. A significantly shorter LOS for the ERAS group (median, 14 days; range, 10-19) than for non-ERAS patients (median, 17.5 days; range, 13-21) was observed (p = 0.0128). The incidence of complications was not significantly different (p = 0.140). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the introduction of an ERAS protocol in the daily practice is feasible, and can result in significant reduction in LOS.

Educational intervention through a comic book for preoperative anxiety in children, adolescents, and their parents: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Reducing preoperative anxiety can help optimize surgical care. AIM: To analyze the effectiveness of verbal guidance by nurses versus verbal guidance combined with a comic book on preoperative anxiety in children and their parents. METHODS: We conducted a randomized parallel, two-group controlled clinical trial in the pediatric ward and a blinded anxiety assessment in the operating room of a Brazilian hospital. Individuals aged 6-14 years undergoing surgical procedures of up to 4 h for the first time were included in the study. Parents who were adults, literate, and able to communicate verbally were included. The primary outcome was the children's anxiety, measured by the Children Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS); the secondary outcome was the parents' anxiety, assessed by the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale. Participants were divided into the intervention (IG; n = 60) and control (CG; n = 60) groups. FINDINGS: The two groups were homogeneous. The median age of the children was 8 years. No significant differences were observed in the CAQ and VAS scores between the two assessment time points or in the mYPAS scores between the IG and CG. However, parents' anxiety significantly decreased in both groups. APPLICATION TO PRACTICE: Preoperative guidance by nurses, either verbal only or verbal information with a comic book proved beneficial in reducing parental anxiety. However, both interventions, performed on the day of surgery, failed to reduce preoperative anxiety in children and adolescents upon admission to the operating room. We recommended the process of preparing the child should begin after scheduling the surgery.

Impact of a digital manual for guidance on malignant hyperthermia: patient education.

BACKGROUND: Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a rare, hereditary disease with a hypermetabolic response to volatile anesthetics/succinylcholine. Susceptible patients face difficulties due to a lack of knowledge about MH. As informational materials could increase knowledge and adherence to prevention/therapy, digital information about rare diseases validated for patients is needed. Our objective was to evaluate the following: (1) the impact of digital manuals on the knowledge/quality of life of MH patients and (2) access to MH services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty MH-susceptible patients filled out a virtual questionnaire twice (demographic/economic/clinical data, MH knowledge and impact on daily life, and SF-36 quality of life). Test groups 1 (n = 17) and 2 (n = 16) were evaluated 30 and 180 days after receiving a digital manual, and the control group (n = 17; without manual) was evaluated after 180 days. We collected the MH service data about the number of contacts. RESULTS: Twenty-four (48%) patients reported problems in personal/professional life, sports, clinical/surgical/dental treatments, and military service, in addition to concerns about emergency care and complaints of sequelae. The percentage of correct answers in the second MH knowledge questionnaire increased for test group 2 (62% vs. 74.1%; unpaired t test, p < 0.01), was significantly greater in test groups 1 (68.1%) and 2 (74.1%) than in the control group (56.5%; Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.05), and correlated with more time studying the manual and reports of MH-related problems (multiple regression, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The digital manual improved patients' MH knowledge. Online contacts with the MH service increased, allowing greater information dissemination. As informational materials could increase knowledge/adherence to prevention/therapy, digital information about MH validated for patients should be implemented.

Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.

OBJECTIVE: Hysterectomy is a common gynaecological procedure, and therefore online information is highly valuable to patients. Our objective was to evaluate the quality, readability, and comprehensiveness of online patient information on hysterectomy. METHODS: The first 25 patient-directed websites on hysterectomy, identified using 5 online search engines (Google, Yahoo, AOL, Bing, Ask.com) as well as clinical professional societies, were assessed using validated tools for quality (DISCERN, JAMA benchmark), readability (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level [FKGL], Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook [SMOG], Flesch Reading Ease Score [FRES]), and completeness of information. RESULTS: We identified 50 websites for inclusion. Overall, websites were of good quality (median DISCERN score 53/80 [interquartile range {IQR} 47-61]; median JAMA score 3/4 [IQR 1-4]). Most websites described surgical risks (39, 78%), benefits (45, 90%), and types of hysterectomy (48, 96%). Content readability corresponded to grade 11 using FKGL (median 11.1 [IQR 10.2-13.0]) and SMOG (median 10.9 [IQR 10.2-12.4]), or 15 years education using Gunning Fog (median 14.7 [IQR 13.8-16.4]). Websites were assessed as difficult to read using FRES (median 45.6/100 [IQR 37.9-50.9]). No differences were observed in readability scores when we compared websites from clinical professional societies, government, health care, or academic organizations with other websites (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Online patient information on hysterectomy is of good quality and comprehensive. However, the content is above the American Medical Association's recommended grade 6 reading level. Website authors should consider readability to make their content more accessible to patients.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Educational Content Validation Instrument in Health.

Healthcare professionals often use multimedia patient education media, but not all have the same content quality. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the Educational Content Validation Instrument in Health to the Spanish setting and assess its psychometric properties. A methodological validation study was carried out between January and September 2020. Data collection took place from May to June 2020. A translation, back translation, committee review, and pre-testing was carried out. Subsequently, reliability (internal consistency), and validity (factorial and convergent) were assessed by requiring 210 Healthcare Professionals to complete the instrument based on video material. In addition, a refinement of the instrument was conducted based on the modification indexes. The instrument showed adequate internal consistency, although some redundancy in the items (α = .93). Exploratory factor analysis suggested a unifactorial structure that explained an adequate variance (47.37%). Convergent validity was poor (r = .11; P = .05). After analysis, 6 items were deleted without impairing the validity results and eliminating redundancy. Therefore, a 12-item version of the instrument was created. It can help to assess more objectively the contents of the materials prescribed, facilitating the choice of those of higher quality and potentially improving their patients' health outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm the previous results and reassess some of the shortcomings.

The effectiveness of handout assisted versus verbal consent on post-operative recall and understanding - A randomized control study.

BACKGROUND: Consent is an important component of surgical care. Poorly attempted consent bears significant ethical and legal implications. We assessed the effectiveness of handouts in improving postoperative consent understanding and recall compared to standard verbal consent during laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a tool that may improve information retention and leads to better treatment satisfaction. METHODS: This is a prospective block randomized, non-blinded study conducted at a single tertiary hospital. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy between August 2017 and October 2018 were recruited and randomized into Handout Assisted Consent (HC) and Verbal Consent (VC) group. The HC group was given an adjunct handout on laparoscopic cholecystectomy during consent process in addition to the standard verbal consent. A validated open-ended verbal understanding and recall questionnaire was administered to all patients in both groups at Day 1, 30 and 90 after surgery. Patient satisfaction of the consent process was evaluated with Likert scale. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were enrolled, 41 patients and 38 patients in VC and HC groups respectively. Level of understanding among patients were equal and consistent across time in both groups (P > 0.05). There was significant decline (P < 0.0001) for both groups in ability to recall information between Day 1 to Day 30 and Day 30 to Day 90. A slightly higher satisfaction rate was found among patients that received HC (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There is good consistent understanding of the surgery in both groups. However, recall of specific surgical consent items decreased significantly over time in both groups. Handouts may have increased satisfaction among patients but did not improve recall in this preliminary study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: MREC No.:201783-5468.

Development and Assessment of a Low Literacy, Pictographic Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome Action Plan.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess an evidence-based, individualized Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome Action Plan (CVSAP) to optimize both preventative and acute care. STUDY DESIGN: This implementation science project synthesized a combination of clinical practice guidelines, published literature, and clinical experience by a team of CVS clinicians to develop the CVSAP. The tool was developed to include validated pictograms and an automatic, embedded, weight-based dosing calculator to output acute management recommendations. The final version of the CVSAP was tested by patients/caregivers, readability calculators, medical librarians, and clinicians using validated metrics. RESULTS: All pictograms met the criteria for inclusion in the CVSAP. A composite readability score of 5.32 was consistent with a fifth-grade level. Patients/caregivers (n = 70) judged the CVSAP to be of high quality with consumer information rating form rating of 84.2%. Six medical librarians rated the CVSAP to have 93% understandability and 100% actionability, and 33 clinicians completing the SAM generated a suitability rating of 87.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The CVSAP visually highlights individualized care plan components to facilitate optimized preventative and acute CVS care. Further investigation will determine if CVSAP increases caregiver confidence and compliance in home management and improves quality of life and clinical outcomes for patients with CVS.

Readability assessment of vaccine information: A systematic review for addressing vaccine hesitancy.

OBJECTIVE: Vaccine hesitancy is a problem attracting growing attention and concern. Communication can be an effective tool to counteract vaccine hesitancy and promote optimal vaccine uptake. Readability has been recognized as one of the more important aspects of health communication for achieving good health literacy. We reviewed studies of readability assessment in the area of vaccine communication. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in September 2020, using four online databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycArticles, and PsycINFO). We included studies that assessed the readability level of online and offline vaccine information materials. RESULTS: We found 12 articles that were appropriate for inclusion. Ten of the studies were published after 2016. The readability levels of the majority of the materials assessed were found to be difficult and higher than 8th-grade level. CONCLUSION: Readability assessments of vaccine information are scarce. The limited evidence shows that the readability level of vaccine information supplied by health care providers is more difficult to read than recommended. More studies on the readability of vaccine information are recommended. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Difficulty reading vaccine information may influence attitudes toward acceptance of or hesitancy to take vaccines. It is recommended that health care professionals use guidelines and tools to create easy-to-read vaccine information.

Preparation, validation, and evaluation of an information leaflet for patients undergoing day-care surgeries under general anesthesia at a busy tertiary care hospital.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is essential that patients posted for day-care surgeries are adequately prepared preoperatively. Verbal information alone may not be always effective. This study aimed to prepare, validate, and evaluate the efficacy of a patient information leaflet (PIL) for patients undergoing day-care surgeries under general anesthesia (GA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: After approval from the hospital ethics committee a PIL was prepared in English. Readability and design of the leaflet were checked using standard tests: Flesch readability ease test (FRE), Flesch Kincaid grade level (FKGL), and Baker Able leaflet design (BALD). It was translated into three regional languages. The PIL was tested among patients using a questionnaire. Seventy-nine adult patients posted for elective day-care procedures were included while emergency surgeries were excluded. Patient knowledge pre and post-PIL was compared using paired 't' test. The influence of age, gender, and education level on the usefulness of PIL were analyzed using the Chi-square test and knowledge was compared using ANOVA. RESULTS: The English leaflet had an FRE Score of 63.9 and FKGL of 6.4, which is "standard". The BALD score for all leaflets was 25 ("above standard"). The overall knowledge scores significantly improved from 52.6% (preintervention) to 70.7% (postintervention), P < 0.001. Knowledge improvement was seen with the use of PIL in all four languages. Sixty eight percent of patients strongly recommended the PIL while 31% were willing to recommend it to others. CONCLUSION: The PILs developed in this study have standard readability, good design and validated for efficacy.

Impact of an Educational Pamphlet on Knowledge About Health Risks After Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients' knowledge, risk perception, and anxiety about future health risks after an episode of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP), as well as their satisfaction with an educational pamphlet. METHODS: From January 2016 to June 2017, participants were randomly assigned to one of 2 groups and asked to complete questionnaire #1 (demographics, knowledge, risk perception, anxiety, and satisfaction) after receiving medical counselling at the HDP postpartum clinic. Participants in the intervention group then received the educational pamphlet. One month later, both groups completed the questionnaire again (questionnaire #2). The primary outcome of this study was improvement in the global knowledge score at 1 month, reflecting improved understanding of the health risks of HDP. Secondary outcomes included retention of information, risk perception, satisfaction, and anxiety level. RESULTS: Of 137 eligible women, 57 were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 56, to the control group. Participants in both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Thirteen percent of participants did not complete questionnaire #2. The knowledge score was higher in the intervention group than the control group at 1 month, (88.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 26.37-28.32 and 71.3%; 95% CI 20.78-23.45, respectively [P <0.0001]). No difference was seen in anxiety level between the groups (4.0 ± 1.00 vs. 3.8 ± 0.92; P = 0.6746). The intervention group was highly satisfied with the medical counselling they received (5.5 ± 0.84 out 6) and with the pamphlet (5.6 ± 0.66 out 6). CONCLUSION: The educational pamphlet increased women's knowledge about future health risks of HDP without increasing anxiety and it may be helpful in promoting lifestyle changes necessary to modify these risks.

Construção e validação do conteúdo da cartilha para crianças "é hora de pegar minha veia: o que eu faço?" / Construcción y validación del contenido del folleto infantil "es hora de tomarme las venas: ¿qué hago? / Construction and validation of the content of the children's booklet "it's time to get my vein: what do i do?"

RESUMO Objetivo: construir e validar o conteúdo da cartilha "É hora de pegar a minha veia: o que eu faço?", juntamente com juízes especialistas na área da Pediatria, para o preparo de crianças com necessidade de cateterização intravenosa periférica. Método: trata-se de um estudo metodológico do tipo validação de conteúdo, desenvolvido conforme o checklist COSMIM, realizado no período de fevereiro de 2015 a fevereiro de 2017, em quatro etapas: diagnóstico situacional, levantamento bibliográfico, seleção e sumarização do conteúdo, elaboração da cartilha e sua validação. Participaram do estudo 11 juízas especialistas na área de Pediatria. Para o processo de validação utilizou-se a técnica Delphi. Consideraram-se como índice de validação de conteúdo desejável os valores iguais ou superiores a 0,80. Resultados: a cartilha obteve índices satisfatórios nas categorias conteúdo, linguagem, ilustração, layout, motivação, cultura e aplicabilidade, sendo validada na segunda rodada com índice de validação de conteúdo global de 0,93. Conclusão: o objetivo do estudo foi alcançado, sendo a cartilha construída e validada pelos juízes especialistas, portanto, pode ser um recurso tecnológico de promoção do cuidado para crianças com necessidade de cateterização intravenosa periférica, configurando-se em uma medida de segurança do paciente.

RESUMEN Objetivo: construir y validar el contenido del folleto "Es hora de tomarme la vena: ¿qué hago?", Junto a jueces expertos en el área de Pediatría, para la preparación de niños con necesidad de cateterismo intravenoso periférico. Método: se trata de un estudio metodológico del tipo de validación de contenido, desarrollado según la lista de verificación COSMIM, realizado de febrero de 2015 a febrero de 2017, en cuatro etapas: diagnóstico situacional, relevamiento bibliográfico, selección y resumen del contenido, elaboración del folleto y su validación. En el estudio participaron once jueces especializados en Pediatría. Para el proceso de validación se utilizó la técnica Delphi. Se consideraron como índice de validación de contenido los valores iguales o superiores a 0,80. Resultados: el folleto obtuvo índices satisfactorios en las categorías contenido, lenguaje, ilustración, maquetación, motivación, cultura y aplicabilidad, siendo validado en la segunda ronda con un índice de validación de contenido global de 0,93. Conclusión: se logró el objetivo del estudio, y el folleto fue construido y validado por los jueces expertos, por lo tanto, puede ser un recurso tecnológico para promover el cuidado de niños con necesidad de cateterismo intravenoso periférico, configurándose como una medida de seguridad del paciente.

ABSTRACT Objective: to build and validate the contents of the booklet "It is time to get my vein: what do I do?", Together with expert judges in the field of Pediatrics, for the preparation of children in need of peripheral intravenous catheterization. Method: this is a methodological study of the content validation type, developed according to the COSMIM checklist, carried out from February 2015 to February 2017, in four stages: situational diagnosis, bibliographic survey, selection and summarization of the content, preparation of the booklet and its validation. Eleven judges specialized in Pediatrics participated in the study. For the validation process, the Delphi technique was used. Values equal to or greater than 0.80 were considered as a content validation index. Results: the booklet obtained satisfactory indexes in the categories content, language, illustration, layout, motivation, culture, and applicability, being validated in the second round with a global content validation index of 0.93. Conclusion: the objective of the study was achieved, with the booklet being constructed and validated by the expert judges, therefore, it can be a technological resource for the promotion of care for children in need of peripheral intravenous catheterization, configuring itself as a patient safety measure.

Using a citizens' jury approach to determine a good nutrition resource for pregnant women.

OBJECTIVE: The development of user-friendly nutrition resources for pregnant women seldom involves end-users. This qualitative study used a citizens' jury approach to determine if our modification of a longstanding, frequently used dietitian-informed diet and diabetes booklet was deemed to be a good healthy eating resource for pregnant women. DESIGN: Midwives recruited thirteen first-time pregnant women not requiring specialist obstetric care or specialist dietetic advice for any reason. Participants were sent a copy of the modified healthy eating in pregnancy booklet prior to 'jury day'. Five women were unable to attend the citizens' jury citing reasons such as early labour. At the jury, five experts presented evidence. Participants adjourned, with an independent facilitator, to 'deliberate' as to whether the resource was suitable or not. The verdict was presented, and subsequent discussion was audio-recorded, transcribed and inductively content analysed. SETTING: Southland, New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women aged 19-35 years (n 8), of whom half had a household income <$NZ30 000. RESULTS: The verdict was 'Yes'; the resource was good. Three themes were derived: communication of health information, resource content and harm reduction in pregnancy. Based on these data, ways to enhance the quality and usability of the booklet were evident. CONCLUSIONS: Citizens' juries can be used to obtain an independent assessment by end-users of health resources. Our modified diet and diabetes booklet was considered suitable for providing healthy eating advice to pregnant women. Inclusion of end-users' perspectives is critical for end-user relevant content, comprehension and resource credibility.