Novel classification of proximal forearm perforator vein in the planning and creation of percutaneous and surgical Gracz-type arteriovenous fistulae.

BACKGROUND: The perforator vein determines whether it is feasible to create a percutaneous (pAVF) or surgical "Gracz-type" arteriovenous fistula (sAVF). Creating a standard anatomic classification of the antecubital region is beneficial to both the selection of the appropriate device and/or procedure and technical outcomes. Accordingly, an analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing pAVF/sAVF was performed, focusing on perforator vein anatomical suitability, and a novel anatomical classification of the antecubital region was developed and proposed. METHODS: Between August 2018 and July 2022, chronic or end-stage kidney disease patients as well as patients anticipated an initiation of apheresis, who were referred for vascular access planning, underwent a standardized evaluation of upper extremities. A vessel mapping summary detailing the vasculature and the access creation plan was completed, indicating the anatomical suitability for sAVF and pAVF (Ellipsys and WavelinQ) techniques. RESULTS: Of 524 patients, 36.5% were female (average age 65 years). 53.2% were on dialysis, 41.6% had diabetes, and 13.2% had a previously failed permanent dialysis access. The anatomy for successful pAVF creation was judged to be suitable in 54% of patients for an Ellipsys-pAVF, and 29.8% for WavelinQ-pAVF. Of the WavelinQ group, 54.4% had suitable anatomy for ulnar, 26.9% for radial, and 18.6% for both ulnar/radial anastomoses. Additionally, 60.7% had suitable anatomy for pAVF creation with at least one of the systems, while 22.5% were suited for both types of pAVF-systems. 80.3% were candidates for creation of a Gracz-AVF. CONCLUSION: Overall, we found that about 60% of patients are likely candidates for a pAVF, with 80% being candidates for creation of a Gracz-AVF. Male patients have significantly higher suitability for most types of AVF creation, and younger patients are more suitable for Ellipsys-pAVF and RCAVFs. Most importantly, a universal classification of perforator vein was developed, which is indispensable in modern vascular access planning.

Which one is better for multi-territory perforator flap survival, central perforator artery or central perforator vein?

BACKGROUND: The survival of multi-territory perforator flap is associated with the position of the perforators. This study aimed to explore whether use of the central perforator artery or vein was better for flap survival. METHODS: 75 male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups (n=25 per group). The flap contained the right and left iliolumbar, left posterior intercostal, and left thoracodorsal angiosomes, termed angiosomes Ⅰ to Ⅳ, respectively. The anastomosis between angiosomes Ⅱ and Ⅲ was termed choke 2. In experimental group 2, only the right iliolumbar vein and the left iliolumbar artery were preserved; in experimental group 1, only the right iliolumbar artery and the left iliolumbar vein were preserved; and in the control group, only the right iliolumbar artery and vein were preserved. On day-7 after the operation, the flap arteriography, intraluminal diameter, average microvascular density, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and flap survival were compared among groups. Moreover, the percentages of the angiosomes were measured. RESULTS: The dilation of the choke 2 artery was most pronounced in experimental group 2, followed by experimental group 1, and, finally, the control group (p<0.05). Similar results regarding average microvascular density, VEGF expression, and survival rate were found among the three groups. The percentages of angiosomes Ⅰ to Ⅳ were 23.1%, 23.0±3.1%, 23.0±1.9%, and 31.0±3.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the central perforator vein, the central perforator artery was more beneficial in enhancing flap survival. A multi-territory perforator flap with the central perforator artery could capture 3 angiosomes safely.

Comparison of high saphenous ligation and stripping, radiofrequency ablation, and subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery for the treatment of active venous ulcers: Retrospective cohort with five-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of high saphenous ligation and stripping, radiofrequency ablation, and subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery for the treatment of active venous ulcers. METHODS: One hundred ninety-five (n = 195) subjects who were treated for venous leg ulcers were enrolled between 2009 and 2014. Three groups were formed (Group A: high saphenous ligation and total stripping, Group B: radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein + perforators, and Group C: radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein + subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery) (n = 65 for each group). The venous clinical severity score for baseline, 1st, 6th, and 12th months, great saphenous vein occlusion at the 1st, 6th, and 12th months, and ulcer rates for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th years were recorded. RESULTS: For venous clinical severity score, only the first month decrease was significant for the subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery group (p = 0.001). Great saphenous vein occlusion was higher at the 6th and 12th months for the high saphenous ligation and stripping and subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery groups than for the radiofrequency ablation group (p = 0.036 and p = 0.037). The rate of ulcers for the subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery group was lower at the second, third, fourth, and fifth years (p = 0.011). No significant difference was found between groups for the five-year recovery rates (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery technique in conjunction with radiofrequency ablation of axial vein was superior to both high saphenous ligation and stripping and radiofrequency ablation of axial and perforators for ulcer healing.

Perforator vein endovenous heat induced thrombosis after laser ablation of the great saphenous vein.

Endovenous heat induced thrombosis at the sapheno-femoral or sapheno-popliteal junction is a well-known complication after superficial truncal vein endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). This report describes a rare thigh perforator vein thrombus propagation into the femoral vein after EVLA of the great saphenous vein.

Basal septal perforator vein mimicking the "late iodine enhancement" in delayed phase cardiac CT for myocardial scar assessment.

Delayed-phase cardiac CT is a useful tool for scar detection, based on differences in the volume of distribution of iodine. Although it covers the entire heart, provides uniform, high isotropic spatial resolution, and therefore may be useful for detecting small late iodine enhancement (LIE), we need to correctly differentiate small LIE and pseudo-lesions mimicking LIE. In this case report, we demonstrate basal septal perforator vein mimicking LIE in delayed phase cardiac CT. Left ventricular myocardium includes not only septal vein and artery but also capillaries, arterio- and venoluminal vessels, and sinusoids, etc. which connect to septal veins. To avoid misinterpretations of myocardial LIE on the delayed phase images, we need to understand those anatomical features.

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Detecting Competent and Incompetent Lower-Extremity Perforating Veins.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the identification of competent and incompetent lower-extremity perforating veins. Patients with chronic venous insufficiency who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. All patients underwent pre-operative CEUS and color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) and accepted subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery. We compared the numbers of perforator veins identified by CEUS and CDU with the endoscopy result, which was considered the gold standard. Fifty cases (56 lower extremities) were enrolled. CEUS detected 132 perforating veins, and CDU detected 104 perforating veins. Endoscopy detected 148 perforating veins. The sensitivity and specificity of CDU in predicting the site of perforating veins in our study were 70.2% and 100%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were 89.2% and 100%, respectively (p <0.05). CEUS could be used to detect perforating veins, including incompetent and competent veins of the lower extremity, because it was more sensitive than CDU, with intra-operative endoscopy as the control standard.

Endovenous laser ablation combined with subfascial endoscopy therapy for venous ulcer of the lower =limbs / 中华普通外科杂志

Objective To study the effect of endovenous laser ablation combined with subfascial endoscopy therapy for venous ulcer of the lower limbs.Methods Clinical data of 112 patients undergoing endovenous laser ablation combined with subfascial endoscopy therapy for venous ulcer of the lower limbs from Oct 2011 to Feb 2016 was retrospectively evaluated.Results Patients had average 2-6 perforating veins in their affected lower limbs.Procedures were successful in all the patients,all the superficial varicose veins disappeared after 1 month and 1 year of ultrasound follow-up,perforating veins closed,ulcer healed,and chromatosis alleviated.Conclusion Endovenous laser ablation combined with subfascial endoscopy therapy for venous ulcer of the lower limbs is effective,safe and quick recovery.

Editor's Choice - Mid-term Outcomes of Endovenous Laser Ablation in Patients with Active and Healed Venous Ulcers: A Follow-up Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the mid-term ulcer recurrence rate in patients with healed or active venous ulcers treated with endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for incompetent superficial axial veins and to search for possible risk factors for non-healing and recurrence. METHODS: Consecutive patients treated with EVLA because of a healed or active venous ulcer between 2006 and 2013 were identified in the medical records and quality registry and invited to follow-up, including clinical history, study examination, Duplex ultrasound scanning, ankle brachial pressure, photoplethysmography, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and health related quality of life (HRQoL) measured with EQ5D. Of 228 patients, 170 (195 legs) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty patients were interviewed by phone, 27 were unreachable and 11 were excluded. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify possible risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 41 months (range 14-89 months). The average age was 66.6 years (range 36-87 years). All 86 legs operated on for an active ulcer had this ulcer healed sometime between the operation and the study examination, but thereafter it recurred in 14 patients (16%). In 109 legs operated on for a healed ulcer, the ulcer recurred in 17 legs (16%). Complications such as permanent sensory loss were seen in 16 legs (8%) and deep venous thrombosis in two legs (1%). Thirty legs (15%) were re-treated for superficial venous incompetence (SVI). Reduced ankle mobility was a risk factor for recurrence in both univariate and multivariate analysis (p=.048). CONCLUSIONS: These midterm results demonstrate that endovenous laser ablation of SVI in patients with healed or active venous ulcers achieves good healing and low ulcer recurrence rates, with a low rate of complications and an acceptable re-intervention rate.

The role of radical surgery in the management of CEAP C5/6 and lipodermatosclerosis.

Aim Analysis of the radical removing of the dermatosclerotic tissues and ulcer(s) with perforator veins dissection as well as local wound and standard compression treatment of CEAP C5/6 stage in a prospective comparative cohort study. Primary endpoint is to compare the results of the one-year follow-up regarding quality of life, vein clinical severity score, and ulcer healing process. Secondary endpoint is the precise presentation of the surgical technique. Tertiary endpoint is to demonstrate the photo-documented results of the postoperative wound treatment protocol. Method Clinical and statistical comparison of radical surgery versus solely wound care and compression in a cohort of 15 patients in each group (Groups 1, 2). In Group 1, radical removing of the dermatosclerotic pannicule and leg ulcer, perforator vein dissection, great saphenous vein, or small saphenous vein was performed. Quality of life , pain intensity, vein clinical severity score and patients' load capacity were compared. The tissue oxygen saturation changes were monitored via near infra-red spectroscopy. Results Both groups were statistically comparable. Wound healing in the operated group was 100% versus 60% in the second one, the difference was significant, p = 0.006. The quality of life: 45.33 versus 36.8, p < 0.001, intensity of leg restless and pain: 2.28 versus 5.3, p < 0.001, changes of vein clinical severity score: 5.27 versus 20.93, p < 0.001, changes of tO2sat: 19.00 versus 6.07 in the upper third of the leg p < 0.001, proved significantly better in group 1 compared to 2. Load capacity was significantly better in group 1 than 2 at the end of the study. The average wound healing time was 113 days in group 1. Conclusion The radical surgery provides significantly better results, considering quality of life, vein clinical severity score, load capacity than the conservative treatment in this study.

Minimally invasive treatments for perforator vein insufficiency.

Incompetent superficial veins are the most common cause of lower extremity superficial venous reflux and varicose veins; however, incompetent or insufficient perforator veins are the most common cause of recurrent varicose veins after treatment, often unrecognized. Perforator vein insufficiency can result in pain, skin changes, and skin ulcers, and often merit intervention. Minimally invasive treatments have replaced traditional surgical treatments for incompetent perforator veins. Current minimally invasive treatment options include ultrasound guided sclerotherapy (USGS) and endovascular thermal ablation (EVTA) with either laser or radiofrequency energy sources. Advantages and disadvantages of each modality and knowledge on these treatments are required to adequately address perforator venous disease.

Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery for chronic venous insufficiency of lower limbs / 中国微创外科杂志

Objective To evaluate the early clinical efficacy of subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS) in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) of lower limbs. Methods A retrospective study was carried out in 26 patients (34 legs) with CVI treated by SEPS. Results The number of incompetent perforating veins ligated per limb ranged 1～5 (mean, 3 5). The postoperative clinical score (2.48?0.25) was significantly lower than the preoperative score (6.54?0.93) ( t =21.497, P