Glaucoma Rehabilitation using ElectricAI Transcranial Stimulation (GREAT)-study protocol for randomized controlled trial using combined perceptual learning and transcranial electrical stimulation for vision enhancement.

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma patients with irreversible visual field loss often experience decreased quality of life, impaired mobility, and mental health challenges. Perceptual learning (PL) and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) have emerged as promising interventions for vision rehabilitation, showing potential in restoring residual visual functions. The Glaucoma Rehabilitation using ElectricAI Transcranial stimulation (GREAT) project aims to investigate whether combining PL and tES is more effective than using either method alone in maximizing the visual function of glaucoma patients. Additionally, the study will assess the impact of these interventions on brain neural activity, blood biomarkers, mobility, mental health, quality of life, and fear of falling. METHODS: The study employs a three-arm, double-blind, randomized, superiority-controlled design. Participants are randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups receiving: (1) real PL and real tES, (2) real PL and sham tES, and (3) placebo PL and sham tES. Each participant undergoes 10 sessions per block (~ 1 h each), with a total of three blocks. Assessments are conducted at six time points: baseline, interim 1, interim 2, post-intervention, 1-month post-intervention, and 2-month post-intervention. The primary outcome is the mean deviation of the 24-2 visual field measured by the Humphrey visual field analyzer. Secondary outcomes include detection rate in the suprathreshold visual field, balance and gait functions, and electrophysiological and biological responses. This study also investigates changes in neurotransmitter metabolism, biomarkers, self-perceived quality of life, and psychological status before and after the intervention. DISCUSSION: The GREAT project is the first study to assess the effectiveness of PL and tES in the rehabilitation of glaucoma. Our findings will offer comprehensive assessments of the impact of these treatments on a wide range of brain and vision-related metrics including visual field, neural activity, biomarkers, mobility, mental health, fear of falling, and quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05874258 . Registered on May 15, 2023.

Purtscher Retinopathy Resulting from a Car Crash Accident-Multimodal Imaging Value.

Purtscher retinopathy is a rare but severe sight-threatening eye condition that mostly occurs in middle-aged men after chest compression or head injury. In cases such as acute pancreatitis, connective tissue disorders, kidney failure or COVID-19 infection with similar ocular findings but no history of trauma, a diagnosis of Purtscher-like retinopathy is made. We present a case of a 72-year-old female with typical symptoms of Purtscher retinopathy in both eyes after a car crash accident. Although the pathophysiology of the disease is not fully understood, the main cause of Purtscher retinopathy seems to be an embolic occlusion of the precapillary arterioles which supply the superficial peripapillary capillaries. Activation of the C5a component of the complement predisposes the leukocytes to aggregation, which obstructs blood flow. The main symptom of Purtscher retinopathy is sudden, painless deterioration of vision which occurs up to 48 h after the injury. In most patients, the changes observed in the fundus of the eye resolve within several months, and visual acuity slowly improves, sometimes even returning to the state from before the injury. However, risk factors such as older age, high hyperopia, and late treatment implementation can make the prognosis less favorable.

Comparison of a Novel Head-Mounted Objective Auto-perimetry (Gaze Analyzing Perimeter) and Humphrey Field Analyzer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between 24-2 visual field (VF) test results obtained using the gaze analyzing perimeter (GAP; Findex) and the Humphrey field analyzer (HFA; Carl Zeiss Meditec). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients underwent HFA 24-2 for suspected or confirmed VF loss and were treated at the Kyoto University Hospital between December 2022 and July 2023. METHODS: Patients underwent consecutive VF tests on the same eye using HFA and GAP 24-2 tests. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare GAP and HFA results. Examination points where the sensitivity measured using GAP was ≥ 10 dB higher than that measured using HFA were re-evaluated by referring back to the original gaze data; 2 ophthalmologists assessed whether the gaze moved linearly toward the new test target. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean deviation (MD) and elapsed time on an individual basis and sensitivity on an examination point basis. RESULTS: Forty-seven eyes of 47 patients were analyzed. The correlation coefficient of the MD using HFA and GAP was 0.811 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.683-0.891). Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between HFA and GAP tests. The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) in MD between HFA and GAP results was -0.63 dB (-5.81 to 4.54 dB). Although no statistically significant differences were observed in the elapsed time (P = 0.99), measurements completed within 200 seconds were observed only in the GAP group (11 cases, 23.4%), who had significantly better HFA MD value than others (P = 0.001). On an examination point basis for sensitivity, the correlation coefficient between HFA and GAP was 0.691 (95% limits of agreement, 0.670-0.711). Original gaze data assessment revealed that the gaze moved linearly toward the new test target for 70.2% of the examination points with a sensitivity discrepancy. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the GAP provides VF assessment outcomes comparable to those of the HFA. The GAP exhibited advantages in terms of testing time, particularly in patients with minimal VF impairment. Furthermore, the GAP records all eye movements, enabling the objective determination of VF abnormalities based on gaze patterns and facilitating easy posthoc verification. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

[Virtual reality perimetry and home perimetry]. / "Virtual reality perimetry" und "home perimetry".

In this article virtual reality (VR)-based procedures for home perimetry (HP) are described and an overview is given of which procedures can already be used today.

Visual Field Tests: A Narrative Review of Different Perimetric Methods.

Visual field (VF) testing dates back to fifth century B.C. It plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of retinal and neurological diseases. This review summarizes each of the different VF tests and perimetric methods, including the advantages and disadvantages and adherence to the desired standard diagnostic criteria. The review targets beginners and eye care professionals and includes history and evolution, qualitative and quantitative tests, and subjective and objective perimetric methods. VF testing methods have evolved in terms of technique, precision, user-friendliness, and accuracy. Consequently, some earlier perimetric techniques, often still effective, are not used or have been forgotten. Newer technologies may not always be advantageous because of higher costs, and they may not achieve the desired sensitivity and specificity. VF testing is most often used in glaucoma and neurological diseases, but new objective methods that also measure response latencies are emerging for the management of retinal diseases. Given the varied perimetric methods available, clinicians are advised to select appropriate methods to suit their needs and target disease and to decide on applying simple vs. complex tests or between using subjective and objective methods. Newer, rapid, non-contact, objective methods may provide improved patient satisfaction and allow for the testing of children and the infirm.

[Role of point-by-point light sensitivity in the assessment of glaucoma progression]. / Rol' potochechnoi svetochuvstvitel'nosti v otsenke progressirovaniya glaukomy.

PURPOSE: This study analyzes changes in light sensitivity in each test point of the visual field in patients with different stages of glaucoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of a prospective analytical case-control study were analyzed. All patients underwent assessment of retinal light sensitivity and its variability in 54 points corresponding to the 24-2 program. Mean light sensitivity values were calculated in each point. Intergroup analysis was performed to evaluate changes in light sensitivity in each point. RESULTS: The range of light sensitivity decrease in the early glaucoma group compared to the control group was from 1.5 to 3.6 dB. The range of light sensitivity decrease in the moderate glaucoma group compared to the control group was from 2.1 to 11.5 dB, and compared to the early glaucoma group - from -0.9 to 7.9 dB. The most frequent decrease in light sensitivity was detected in the nasal sector and along the horizontal line in the upper half of the visual field. This trend persisted within the central 10 degrees of the visual field. The range of light sensitivity decrease in the advanced glaucoma group compared to the control group was from 14.1 to 28.0 dB, and compared to the early glaucoma group - from 11.35 to 26.08 dB, compared to the moderate glaucoma group - from 9.1 to 23.5 dB. The most frequent and severe decrease in light sensitivity was detected in the paracentral zone in the lower half of the visual field. CONCLUSION: The study analyzed the trends in the development of glaucoma from the early to the advanced stage. The most frequent and severe defect in light sensitivity in cases of verified advanced glaucoma was found in the lower half of the visual field. Points No. 32, 33 and 40 can be indicated as the area of interest in assessing the progression of glaucoma, as they were found to have the most profound changes in light sensitivity as glaucoma progressed.

[Thresholds and variability of retinal light sensitivity in each point of the examined visual field]. / Porogovye znacheniya i variabel'nost' svetochuvstvitel'nosti setchatki v kazhdoi tochke issleduemogo polya zreniya.

PURPOSE: This study assesses the light sensitivity and its variability in each point of the visual field in patients without glaucoma and with different stages of glaucoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of a prospective analytical case-control study involving 500 patients were analyzed. The initial examination of all patients was performed using basic ophthalmological methods, including static perimetry. Retinal light sensitivity and its variability were assessed in 54 points corresponding to the Humphrey 24-2 program. Mean deviation and pattern standard deviation of light sensitivity were calculated for each point. RESULTS: The lowest light sensitivity values in patients with moderate glaucoma were found in the periphery of the nasal sector, at point No. 27 - 14.4 dB, and at points No. 24-26 along the horizontal axis from the nasal side - from 17.7 to 22.7 dB. The maximum variability of light sensitivity was found in the nasal sector on both sides of the horizontal line - from 10.7 to 11.5 dB. The average light sensitivity above the horizontal axis in patients with advanced glaucoma was 10.8 dB, which is 2 dB higher than in the lower half of the visual field - 8.8 dB. The highest light sensitivity values were found at points No. 24 - 17.7 dB and No. 31 - 16.78 dB, the lowest - at point No. 32 - 4.5 dB. The average variability values of light sensitivity in the upper half of the visual field were 9.6 dB, which is 1 dB less than in the lower half of the visual field - 10.6 dB. CONCLUSION: According to our data, points No. 32 and No. 40 are of particular interest in the diagnostic plan. In these loci, the highest light sensitivity values were determined in early and moderate glaucoma. However, the values in these points decrease significantly in advanced glaucoma. It can be assumed that changes in light sensitivity in these loci at the early stages of glaucoma may be a predictor of glaucoma progression.

Changes in the Visual Field Test after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Advanced Glaucoma.

Background: To evaluate changes in the visual field (VF) after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with advanced glaucoma and previous trabeculectomy. Methods: Changes in VF, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and number of glaucoma medications were analyzed before and after DSAEK in 19 eyes. The VFs were evaluated using the 10-2 program of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and/or Goldmann perimetry (GP). Results: In nine eyes, the MD improved from -22.24 ± 6.5 dB to -18.36 ± 5.1 dB in HFA. In five out of nine eyes, postoperative MD improved >1 dB compared to preoperative MD. In GP testing, 10 out of 15 eyes showed an improvement, that is, greater than 20° in VF enlargement by the isopter of I-4e and/or new detection of a smaller or darker isopter. Overall, improvement in VF with the HFA and/or GP test was observed in 12/19 (63.2%) eyes after DSAEK. Postoperative BCVA improved by more than two lines in logMAR VA in 18 of 19 (94.7%) eyes. There were no significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative IOP and the number of glaucoma medications. Conclusions: DSAEK may produce subjective improvement in the visual field as well as improved visual acuity, even in advanced glaucomatous eyes.

Prospective Comparison of VisuALL Virtual Reality Perimetry and Humphrey Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma.

Aim and background: Automated perimetry plays an important role in the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma patients. The purpose of this study is to prospectively determine parity between Humphrey visual field analyzer (HVFA) perimetry (the current gold standard) and the VisuALL virtual reality perimeter (VRP). Materials and methods: In this prospective fully paired diagnostic accuracy study, patients with stable, long-term HVFA visual fields (horizontal dots for ≥4 consecutive visits on progression analysis) with preperimetric, mild, moderate, or severe visual field loss were familiarized with the VRP and then tested using its proprietary software. These results were used for point-by-point comparison with a contemporaneous HVFA test. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America (IRB approval #20-06-002). Results: The prospective study analyzed 43 eyes of 24 glaucoma patients. Spearman's correlation of mean deviation (MD) revealed a strong correlation between HVFA and VRP with rs(41) = 0.871, p < 0.001. The overall mean difference in locus-locus sensitivity between the devices was -0.4 ± 1.5 dB but varied for different visual field locations and glaucoma severity. Conclusion: The parity between the VRP and HVFA was remarkably strong for mild and moderate glaucoma. Given its portability, ease of use, space efficiency, and low cost, the VRP presents a viable alternative. Clinical significance: Automated perimetry, specifically the HVFA, has been the gold standard for visual field assessment since its introduction. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has illuminated the advantages of the VRP, allowing for safer visual assessment for both patient and clinician alike. Our study hopes to establish parity between these systems, allowing for the efficient integration of a novel head-mounted perimetry system that can safely diagnose and monitor glaucomatous progression in clinical practice. Precis: Investigation of parity between Olleyes VisuALL virtual reality perimetry (VRP) and existing standard HVFA perimetry is essential to the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. Linear correlations between the two were established from 43 glaucomatous eyes. Parity was strong for mild and moderate glaucoma, presenting VRP as a viable alternative. How to cite this article: Griffin JM, Slagle GT, Vu TA, et al. Prospective Comparison of VisuALL Virtual Reality Perimetry and Humphrey Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2024;18(1):4-9.

The structure-function relationship between multifocal pupil perimetry and retinal nerve fibre layer in glaucoma.

BACKGROUND: Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) is a novel method for assessing functional change in diseases like glaucoma. Previous research has suggested that, in contrast to the pretectally-mediated melanopsin response of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells, mfPOP responses to transient onset stimuli involve the extrastriate cortex, and thus the main visual pathway. We therefore investigate the correlation between peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL) thickness and glaucomatous visual field changes detected using mfPOP. Parallel analyses are undertaken using white on white standard automated perimetry (SAP) for comparison. METHODS: Twenty-five glaucoma patients and 24 normal subjects were tested using SAP, 3 mfPOP variants, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Arcuate clusters of the SAP and mfPOP deviations were weighted according to their contribution to published arcuate divisions of the retinal nerve fibre layer. Structure-function correlation coefficients (r) were computed between pRNFL clock-hour sector thickness measurements, and the local visual field sensitivities from both SAP and mfPOP. RESULTS: The strongest correlation was observed in the superior-superotemporal disc sector in patients with worst eye SAP MD < -12 dB: r = 0.93 for the mfPOP LumBal test (p < 0.001). Correlations across all disc-sectors were strongest in these same patients in both SAP and mfPOP: SAP r = 0.54, mfPOP LumBal r = 0.55 (p < 0.001). In patients with SAP MD ≥ -6 dB in both eyes, SAP correlations across all sectors were higher than mfPOP; mfPOP correlations however, were higher than SAP in more advanced disease, and in normal subjects. CONCLUSIONS: For both methods the largest correlations with pRNFL thickness corresponded to the inferior nasal field of more severely damaged eyes. Head-to-head comparison of mfPOP and SAP showed similar structure-function relationships. This agrees with our recent reports that mfPOP primarily stimulates the cortical drive to the pupils.

Short Wavelength Automated Perimetry, Standard Automated Perimetry, and Optical Coherence Tomography in Dominant Optic Atrophy.

Background: Blue-yellow axis dyschromatopsia is well-known in Autosomal Dominant Optic Atrophy (ADOA) patients, but there were no data on the correlation between retinal structure and short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) values in this pathology. Methods: In this cross-sectional case-control study, we assessed the correlation between best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), standard automated perimetry (SAP), SWAP, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters of 9 ADOA patients compared with healthy controls. Correlation analysis was performed between BCVA, mean deviation, pattern standard deviation (PSD), and fovea sensitivity (FS) values and the OCT thickness of each retinal layer and the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL). Results: The following significant and strong correlations were found: between BCVA and ganglion cell layer (GCL) and the global (G) pRNFL thicknesses; between SAP FS and GCL and the G-pRNFL thicknesses; between SWAP PSD and total retina, GCL, inner plexiform layer, inner nuclear layer, inner retinal layer and the temporal pRNFL thicknesses. We found a constant shorter duration of the SITA-SWAP compared with the SITA-STANDARD strategy. Conclusions: SWAP, SAP, and BCVA values provided relevant clinical information about retinal involvement in our ADOA patients. The perimetric functional parameters that seemed to correlate better with structure involvement were FS on SAP and PSD on SWAP.

Development and evaluation of Order of Magnitude (OM): a virtual reality-based visual field analyzer for glaucoma detection.

PURPOSE: This study introduces the Order of Magnitude (OM), a cost-effective, indigenous, virtual reality-based visual field analyzer designed for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. METHODS: The OM test employs a two-step supra-thresholding algorithm utilizing stimuli of 0.43°diameter (equivalent to Goldmann size III) at low and high thresholds. A comparative analysis was conducted against the Humphrey visual field (HVF) test, considered the gold standard in clinical practice. Participants, including those with glaucoma and normal individuals, underwent comprehensive eye examinations alongside the OM and HVF tests between April and October 2019. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the OM test were assessed against clinical diagnoses made by specialists. RESULTS: We studied 157 eyes (74 glaucomatous, 83 control) of 152 participants. Results demonstrated a high level of reliability for both OM and HVF tests, with no significant difference observed (P = 0.19, Chi-square test). The sensitivity and specificity of the OM test were found to be 93% (95% CI 86-100%) and 83% (95% CI 72.4-93%), respectively, while the HVF test showed sensitivity and specificity of 98% (95% CI 93.9-100%) and 83% (95% CI 73.9-92.8%), respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the OM test is non-inferior to the reference standard HVF test in identifying glaucomatous visual field loss.

Optical coherence tomography angiography in the diagnosis of ocular disease.

Clinical imaging provided by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and its variant, OCT-angiography (OCT-A), has revolutionised eyecare practice. The imaging techniques allow for the identification and quantification of ocular structures, supporting the diagnosis and prognosis of eye disease. In this review, an overview of the usefulness of OCT-A imaging in the diagnosis and management of a range of ocular conditions is provided when used in isolation or in combination with other imaging modalities and measures of visual function (visual field results). OCT-A imaging has the capacity to identify and quantify ocular vasculature non-invasively, thereby assisting the clinician in the diagnosis or to determine the efficacy of intervention in ocular conditions impacting retinal vasculature. Thus, additional clinically useful information can be obtained in eye diseases involving conditions such as those impacting retinal vessel occlusion, in diabetic retinopathy, inherited retinal dystrophy, age-related macular degeneration, choroidal neovascularisation and optic nerve disorders. Through a clinical case series, various ocular conditions are reviewed, and the impact of OCT-A imaging is discussed. Although OCT-A imaging has great promise and is already used in clinical management, there is a lack of set standards to characterise altered vascular features in disease and consequently for prognostication, primarily due to a lack of large-scale clinical trials and variability in OCT-A algorithms when generating quantitative parameters.

Comparing 2-dimensional macular pigment optical density with objective and subjective perimetry and visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To compare diagnostic power for different severities of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) of two-dimensional macular pigment optical densities (2D-MPOD) and spatially matched objective perimetry, with standard perimetry and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). METHODS: The ObjectiveField Analyser (OFA) provided objective perimetry, and a Heidelberg Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT) measured 2D-MPOD in AMD patients, both completed twice over 0.99 ± 0.16 years. From each 2D-MPOD image, we extracted 20 regions/macula, matched to the 20 OFA stimuli/macula. For each region, we calculated 7 measures from the 2D-MPOD pixel values and correlated those with OFA sensitivities and delays. We quantified 2D-MPOD changes, the ability of 2D-MPOD and OFA to discriminate AMD stages, and the discriminatory power of Matrix perimetry and BCVA using percentage area under receiver operator characteristic plots (%AUROC). RESULTS: In 58 eyes of 29 subjects (71.6 ± 6.3 years, 22 females), we found significant correlations between 2D-MPOD and OFA sensitivities for Age-Related Eye Disease Studies (AREDS)-3 and AREDS-4 severities. Delays showed significant correlations with AREDS-2. For AREDS-4, correlations extended across all eccentricities. Regression associated with the Bland-Altman plots showed significant changes in 2D-MPOD over the study period, especially variability measures. MPOD per-region medians discriminated AREDS-1 from AREDS-3 eyes at a %AUROC of 80.0 ± 6.3%, outperforming OFA, Matrix perimetry, and BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: MPOD changes correlated with central functional changes and significant correlations extended peripherally in later-stage AMD. Good diagnostic power for earlier-stage AMD and significant change over the study suggest that 2D-MPOD and OFA may provide effective biomarkers.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Quality of Examination in Eye Clinics in the Czech Republic - Questionnaire Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to map the behavior of ophthalmologists regarding protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic (coronavirus disease 2019), both during the time of the mandatory restrictive measures and after their relaxation. Another aim was to evaluate the awareness of ophthalmologists in the Czech Republic about the possible impact of nose and mouth protective measures (masks, respirators) on the quality of eye examinations, especially on the results of standard automated perimetry (SAP) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of two professional ophthalmological events in the Czech Republic, which took place in 2022, we obtained and evaluated data from the ophthalmologists in attendance using a questionnaire. We evaluated demographic parameters, frequency of use and type of nose and mouth protective equipment and their influence on the quality of ophthalmological examination as well as the awareness of ophthalmologists about their possible influence on the outcome of SAP and IOP measurements. RESULTS: We obtained data from a total of 212 respondents (148 women, 44 men, in 20 cases gender was not stated). In 91.5% of cases, ophthalmologists agreed that the use of respirators and masks makes ophthalmological examination more difficult. The most common problems were eyepiece fogging (85.8%), examination lens fogging (85.8%), and lens fogging when spectacles correction was prescribed (79.2%). The respondents most often combated these problems either by completely removing the respirator (24.1%) or at least by pulling it under the nose (39.2%). At the time when the measures were relaxed, significantly more men did not use any nose and mouth protection at all during ophthalmological examinations (15.8% of men vs. 4.2% of women; p = 0.032). An alarming finding was the fact that 35.6% of respondents did not know whatsoever whether the nurse was performing a perimetry examination on a patient with a respirator/mask or without protective equipment, i.e. they were not aware whatsoever of the possible formation of artifacts. Only 21.2% of respondents were aware of the possible difficulties of measuring IOP while wearing a respirator, while 59.9% of respondents were not aware of this risk (39.6% had never considered this problem, 20.3% of respondents were convinced that a respirator could not have an effect on the measurement of IOP). CONCLUSION: The use of nose and mouth protective equipment clearly affects the ophthalmological examination and makes it more difficult. Although ophthalmologists belong to a group at high risk for the possible transmission of infection in the performance of their profession, they often removed nose and mouth protection in an effort to eliminate fogging of eyepieces and examination lenses. The awareness of ophthalmologists regarding the possible influence on the results of SAP and IOP measurement by wearing a respirator was low in our questionnaire survey. It is therefore advisable to discuss this issue more widely and warn doctors about these risks.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Qualitative Visual Field Tests for Screening Visual Hemifield Deficits in Right-Brain-Damaged Stroke Patients.

A timely detection of visual hemifield deficits (VHFDs; hemianopias or quadrantanopias) is critical for both the diagnosis and treatment of stroke patients. The present study determined the sensitivity and specificity of four qualitative visual field tests, including face description, confrontation tests (finger wiggle), and kinetic boundary perimetry, to screen large and dense VHFDs in right-brain-damaged (RBD) stroke patients. Previously, the accuracy of qualitative visual field tests was examined in unselected samples of patients with heterogeneous aetiology, in which stroke patients represented a very small fraction. Building upon existing tests, we introduced some procedural ameliorations (incl. a novel procedure for kinetic boundary perimetry) and provided a scoresheet to facilitate the grading. The qualitative visual field tests' outcome of 67 consecutive RBD stroke patients was compared with the standard automated perimetry (SAP; i.e., reference standard) outcome to calculate sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), both for each individual test and their combinations. The face description test scored the lowest sensitivity and NPV, while the kinetic boundary perimetry scored the highest. No test returned false positives. Combining the monocular static finger wiggle test (by quadrants) and the kinetic boundary perimetry returned the highest sensitivity and specificity, in line with previous studies, but with higher accuracy (100% sensitivity and specificity). These findings indicate that the combination of these two tests is a valid approach with RBD stroke patients, prompting referral for a formal visual field examination, and representing a quick, easy-to-perform, and inexpensive tool for improving their care and prognosis.

Understanding and identifying visual field progression.

Detecting deterioration of visual field sensitivity measurements is important for the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. This review surveys the current methods for assessing progression that are implemented in clinical devices, which have been used in clinical trials, alongside more recent advances proposed in the literature. Advice is also offered to clinicians on what they can do to improve the collection of perimetric data to help analytical progression methods more accurately predict change. This advice includes a discussion of how frequently visual field testing should be undertaken, with a view towards future developments, such as digital healthcare outside the standard clinical setting and more personalised approaches to perimetry.

Using Fused Data from Perimetry and Optical Coherence Tomography to Improve the Detection of Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma.

Perimetry and optical coherence tomography (OCT) are both used to monitor glaucoma progression. However, combining these modalities can be a challenge due to differences in data types. To overcome this, we have developed an autoencoder data fusion (AEDF) model to learn compact encoding (AE-fused data) from both perimetry and OCT. The AEDF model, optimized specifically for visual field (VF) progression detection, incorporates an encoding loss to ensure the interpretation of the AE-fused data is similar to VF data while capturing key features from OCT measurements. For model training and evaluation, our study included 2504 longitudinal VF and OCT tests from 140 glaucoma patients. VF progression was determined from linear regression slopes of longitudinal mean deviations. Progression detection with AE-fused data was compared to VF-only data (standard clinical method) as well as data from a Bayesian linear regression (BLR) model. In the initial 2-year follow-up period, AE-fused data achieved a detection F1 score of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.57 to 0.62), significantly outperforming (p < 0.001) the clinical method (0.45, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.47) and the BLR model (0.48, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.51). The capacity of the AEDF model to generate clinically interpretable fused data that improves VF progression detection makes it a promising data integration tool in glaucoma management.

Detección y caracterización de defectos del campo visual mediante perimetría Octopus en glaucoma congénito primario / Detection and characterisation of visual field defects using Octopus perimetry in congenital glaucoma

Detectar y caracterizar los defectos del campo visual (CV) mediante perimetría Octopus en pacientes con glaucoma congénito primario (GCP) y determinar la calidad y duración del CV. Material y métodos: Se incluyeron 88 ojos de 70 pacientes diagnosticados de GCP. Las evaluaciones se realizaron con un Octopus 900 y cada ojo se evaluó con el algoritmo de perimetría orientada por tendencias (G-TOP). Se recogieron datos cuantitativos de CV: datos de calidad (respuestas falsa positiva y negativa, y duración del tiempo) y resultados de desviación media (DM) y raíz cuadrada de la varianza de pérdida (sLV). También se recogieron datos cualitativos: presencia de defectos difusos y localizados, hemicampo afectado y grado de defectos utilizando la clasificación de Aulhorn y Karmeyer. Se analizaron las correlaciones entre los resultados perimétricos y las variables clínicas. Resultados: La mediana de edad fue de 11 (8-17) años. El 65,9% (58/88) de los ojos con GCP presentaban defectos de CV. Se observaron defectos difusos en 10/58 ojos (16,94%) (DM media=23,92 [DE: 2,52]) dB) y defectos localizados en 48/58 ojos (82,75%). El defecto más frecuente fue el escotoma incipiente paracentral (n=15), el escalón nasal (n=8), el defecto arciforme añadido (n=2), el semianular (n=13) y el defecto concéntrico con isla central (n=9). El hemicampo visual afectado con mayor frecuencia fue el inferior. La duración media de la prueba fue de 2min 12s (DE: 21,6s). Los valores MD y sLV se correlacionaron con la agudeza visual mejor corregida, la relación excavación/disco y el número de cirugías de glaucoma (todas p<0,001). Conclusión: Se identificó un alto número de defectos difusos y localizados utilizando la perimetría Octopus en pacientes con GCP. El defecto más frecuente fue el escotoma paracentral, y el hemicampo inferior fue el más afectado.(AU)

Purpose: To detect and characterise visual field (VF) defects using static Octopus perimetry in patients with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) and to determine VF quality and time duration. Material and methods: Eighty-eight eyes of 70 patients diagnosed with PCG were included. Assessments were performed using an Octopus 900 and each eye was assessed with the tendency-oriented perimetry (G-TOP) algorithm. Quantitative VF data were collected: quality data (false positive and negative response, and time duration) and results of mean deviation (MD) and square root of loss variance (sLV). Qualitative data were collected: the presence of diffuse and localized defects, the affected hemifield and grade of defects using the Aulhorn and Karmeyer classification. Correlations between perimetric results and clinical variables were analysed. ResultsMedian age was 11 (8-17) years. 65.9% (58/88) of PCG eyes showed VF defects. Diffuse defects were observed in 10/58 eyes (16.94%) (mean MD=23.92 [SD: 2.52]) dB) and localized defects in 48/58 eyes (82.75%). The most frequent defect was spot-like/stroke-like/incipient paracentral scotoma (n=15), nasal step (n=8), adding arcuate defect (n=2), half ring-shaped (n=13) and concentric defect with a central island (n=9). And the most frequent affected visual hemifield was inferior hemifield. Mean test duration was 2min 12s (SD: 21.6s). MD and sLV values were correlated with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cup to disc ratio and number of antiglaucoma surgeries (all P<.001). Conclusion: A high number of diffuse and localized defects were identified using Octopus perimetry in PCG patients. The most frequent defect was paracentral scotoma and inferior hemifield was the most affected.(AU)