Enhanced localized therapeutic precision: A face-to-face folate-targeted Cu2+-mediated nanotherapy with thermosensitive sustained-release system.

Safe and effective Cu2+ supplementation in local lesion is crucial for minimizing toxicity of DSF-based chemotherapy. Targeted delivery of Cu2+ appears more promising. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinoma (PC) establishes "face-to-face" contact between targeted nanocarriers and tumor tissue. Herein, this study developed a biodegradable, injectable thermosensitive hydrogel that coencapsulating DSF submicroemulsion (DSF-SE) and folate-modified liposome loading glycyrrhizic acid-Cu (FCDL). FCDL acted as 'beneficial horse' to target the tumor-localized folate receptor, thus liberating Cu2+ in tumor nidus. The prepared FCDL and DSF-SE were found with uniform sizes (160.2 nm, 175.4 nm), low surface charge (-25.77 mV, -16.40 mV) and high encapsulation efficiency (97.93 %, 90.08 %). In vitro drug release profile of FCDL, DSF-SE and FCDL＆DSF-SE@G followed a sustained release pattern. And the release behavior of Cu2+ from FCDL was pH-related, i.e., Cu2+ was released faster under acidic condition. When FCDL and DSF-SE were loaded into an PLGA-PEG-PLGA-based hydrogel system, FCDL＆DSF-SE@G was formed to ensure separated delivery of Cu2+ and DSF in space but synchronized release over time. The rheology experiment showed a satisfactory gelling temperature of 32.7 °C. In vitro cytotoxicity study demonstrated that FCDL＆DSF-SE@G significantly lowered the IC50 of free Cu2+/DSF, Cu2+/DSF hydrogel and non-targeted analogue by almost 70 %, 65 % and 32 %, respectively. Accordingly, in tumor-bearing mice, FCDL＆DSF-SE@G augmented the tumor inhibition rates for the same formulations by 352 %, 145 % and 44 %, respectively. The main mechanism was attributed to higher uptake of FCDL and DSF-SE, resulting in increased Cu(DDTC)2 formation, ROS production and cell apoptosis. In conclusion, this targeted nanotherapy approach with dual-nanocarriers loaded hydrogel system, with its focus on face-to-face contact between nanocarriers and tumor tissues in the peritoneal cavity, holds significant promise for intraperitoneal chemotherapy in PC.

Pembrolizumab with bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide for the treatment of recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma: A case series.

Introduction: Treatment for recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is clinically challenging as response rates to traditional chemotherapy are low, and recurrence rates are high. Immunotherapy has shown promise for this ovarian cancer (OC) subtype, and tumor molecular testing allows for the identification of a patient population that might benefit most from this treatment. We describe the clinical course and somatic genomic testing of 4 patients who received pembrolizumab for recurrent OCCC concurrent with a combination of bevacizumab and/or cyclophosphamide. Methods: All patients with OCCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) within a single health system between 2018 and 2023 (excluding those on clinical trials) were identified via retrospective chart review. Results: Four patients were included. The average age at diagnosis was 56.5 years, and the number of prior treatments ranged from 1 to 6. All patients received pembrolizumab combined with either bevacizumab and/or cyclophosphamide. All patients (n = 3) who received pembrolizumab and bevacizumab experienced a partial response. Responses were durable, ranging from 6 to 15 months. Somatic genomic testing results demonstrated microsatellite stability and low tumor mutational burden in all patient tumors, and 3 had AT-Rich Interaction Domain 1A gene (ARID1A) mutations. Notably, two patients had treatment-limiting toxicities, one with presumed immune-mediated grade 2 myocarditis, and another with grade 5 hepatitis. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab, combined with bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide, is a promising treatment option for patients with recurrent OCCC, though careful risk assessment and counseling regarding toxicities is necessary to maximize the safety and efficacy of this treatment regimen. Prospective studies are needed for validation.

Case report: A case of high grade serous carcinoma of peritoneal origin.

This case report describes an 80-year-old female patient admitted to the emergency department due to abdominal distension, abdominal pain, and hematemesis persisting for three days. Subsequent postoperative pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of peritoneal cancer. The occurrence, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) are presented in detail. PPC is a type of cancer originating from the primary peritoneal mesothelium organization, causing diffuse malignant tumors in the abdominal and pelvic regions. Due to the lack of specific clinical manifestations for this disease, the importance of early diagnosis and treatment is hereby emphasized. The article also mentions the histological source of this type of cancer and the advantages of preoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in improving the efficacy of PPC treatment. Finally, the importance of a comprehensive treatment approach and proficient use of targeted therapy techniques are highlighted to enhance the treatment outcomes of PPC.

Peritoneal Carcinoma Unveiling a Hidden Threat: A Case of Malignant Pericardial Effusion.

Malignant pericardial effusion (MPE) is a slowly progressive and potentially clinically silent condition. Pericardial effusion can arise in oncology patients due to several factors, including disease spreading directly or metastatically, anticancer therapy side effects, or both. Solid and hematological malignancy metastasis more frequently involves the pericardium than primary tumors, with lung cancer being the most common metastatic tumor to involve the pericardium. While 5%-20% of all patients with metastatic neoplasms have pericardial involvement, MPE rarely appears with hemodynamic instability. Occasionally, MPE constitutes the initial manifestation of an underlying malignancy. Diagnosis and treatment require a multidisciplinary approach and a high degree of clinical suspicion. We present a case of a 59-year-old female with a history of peritoneal carcinoma who presented with persistent dyspnea on exertion following an episode of pneumonia that was treated with antibiotics. Physical examination and bedside point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) revealed fluid in the pericardial sac. The cytological examination of the fluid revealed it to be of malignant origin, resulting from metastasis from gynecologic adenocarcinoma. Pericardiocentesis was done, and symptoms improved after fluid drainage.

A disulfiram/copper gluconate co-loaded bi-layered long-term drug delivery system for intraperitoneal treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

To develop a long-term drug delivery system for the treatment of primary and metastatic peritoneal carcinoma (PC) by intraperitoneal (IP) injection, a disulfiram (DSF)/copper gluconate (Cu-Glu)-co-loaded bi-layered poly (lactic acid-coglycolic acid) (PLGA) microspheres (Ms) - thermosensitive hydrogel system (DSF-Ms-Cu-Glu-Gel) was established. Rate and mechanisms of drug release from DSF-Ms-Cu-Glu-Gel were explored. The anti-tumor effects of DSF-Ms-Cu-Glu-Gel by IP injection were evaluated using H22 xenograft tumor model mice. The accumulative release of DSF from Ms on the 10th day was 83.79% without burst release. When Ms were dispersed into B-Gel, burst release at 24 h decreased to 14.63%. The results showed that bis (diethyldithiocarbamate)-copper (Cu(DDC)2) was formed in DSF-Ms-Cu-Glu-Gel and slowly released from B-Gel. In a pharmacodynamic study, the mount of tumor nodes and ascitic fluid decreased in the DSF-Ms-Cu-Glu-Gel group. This was because: (1) DSF-Ms-Cu-Glu-Gel system co-loaded DSF and Cu-Glu, and physically isolated DSF and Cu-Glu before injection to protect DSF; (2) space and water were provided for the formation of Cu(DDC)2; (3) could provide an effective drug concentration in the abdominal cavity for a long time; (4) both DSF and Cu(DDC)2 were effective anti-tumor drugs, and the formation of Cu(DDC)2 occurred in the abdominal cavity, which further enhanced the anti-tumor activity. Thus, the DSF-Ms-Cu-Glu-Gel system can be potentially used for the IP treatment of PC in the future.

Impact of Body Mass Index on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Administration After Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC).

PURPOSE: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new surgical technique, developed for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). In this retrospective observational study we assessed the impact of body mass index (BMI) on postoperative pain and opioid consumption. METHODS: We analyzed pain scores after 100 PIPAC procedures using either oxaliplatin or doxorubicin-cisplatin performed in 49 patients with PC between July 2016 and September 2020. The patients were divided into 3 groups (BMI <18.5, 18.5 ≥ BMI < 25, BMI≥25). Pain was self-rated on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. RESULTS: Univariate logistic regression analysis identified oxaliplatin and PCI score to be associated with moderate to severe pain (VAS 4-10 at 8 am D1) after adjustment on BMI (OR [95% CI]; 3.26[1.00 - 10.65] p=0.050) and (OR [95% CI]; 1.09[1.01 - 1.17] p=0.019). The level of pain appeared significantly different between the treatment groups (median 2.5[0; 5] vs 0[0; 2.5] p=0.0017) irrespective of BMI (p =0.705 and p=0.118). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified moderate to severe pain and synchronous PC to be associated with greater use of opioids (OR [95% CI]: 3.91 [1.24 - 12.32]) and (OR [95% CI]: 5.16 [1.71 - 15.58]; respectively. Opioids were administered after 45 procedures (45%) and was comparable between the treatment groups. Opioid administration and length-of-stay were similar among BMI bands. CONCLUSION: BMI is not related to postoperative pain or opioid use, howevermoderate to severe pain and synchronous PC are factors associated with requiring opioids.

Searching for the source: Extraovarian primary peritoneal carcinoma presenting as chest wall masses.

Background: Extraovarian primary peritoneal carcinoma (EOPPC) is a rare form of epithelial adenocarcinoma arising from the peritoneal lining with little to no ovarian involvement. To date, very few cases of EOPPC with primary tumors outside of the peritoneum have been described, the majority of which present with a primary tumor in the retroperitoneum. No cases have been reported with primary presentation as a chest wall mass. Case report: This case describes a 64-year-old woman referred for the evaluation of PAX8 positive chest wall masses. Biopsies of these masses demonstrated tumor architecture that was predominantly micropapillary with rare psammomatous calcifications. Immunohistochemically, the tumor was PAX8, CK7, ER, MOC31, and BerEP4 positive, with a mutational pattern of p53. This was consistent with Mullerian adenocarcinoma markers and suggestive of high-grade serous carcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with a unique presentation of EOPPC and is currently alive at 36 months post initial diagnosis. She has been treated with a combination of diagnostic surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of EOPPC presenting with a primary tumor of the chest wall. This case highlights the importance of pathology, immunohistology, and interdisciplinary collaboration in diagnosing and treating rare malignancies.

BRCA gene amplification in primary peritoneal high-grade serous carcinoma patient with intrinsic resistance to platinum treatment: a case report.

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard chemotherapy for high grade serous ovarian cancer and primary peritoneal high-grade serous carcinoma. PARP inhibitors have changed the paradigm of the treatment in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancers and primary peritoneal high-grade serous carcinoma with BRCA1/2 mutation or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Platinum-resistant ovarian and primary peritoneal high-grade serous carcinoma have a lower chance to treat and have worse outcomes. We described a case of patient with a platinum resistant primary peritoneal high-grade serous carcinoma with a rare somatic BRCA2 amplification. There are no guidelines for the treatment of ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal high-grade serous carcinoma with BRCA2 amplification. BRCA2 amplification could result in extreme homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway efficiency and in less platinum sensitivity, which could be a molecular signature for platinum resistance. Free platinum chemotherapy regimens could be more effective in cases with BRCA2 amplification. Further studies are necessary to establish better approaches and strategies for oncological management and treatment in BRCA2 amplification high grade ovarian cancer and primary peritoneal high-grade serous carcinoma.

A Rare Case of Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma With Large Bowel Metastasis.

Primary serous peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) is a rare malignancy often presenting with a significant disease burden and a poor prognosis. A 65-year-old female was seen in the surgical outpatient clinic with a two-month history of weight loss, altered bowel habits and a CT scan characterizing a heterogenous right paracolic gutter mass and suspicious liver lesions. At colonoscopy, a prominent appendiceal orifice was biopsied to be poorly differentiated carcinoma favouring gynaecological tract origin. The patient was admitted with an acute small bowel obstruction secondary to progression of metastases and underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a near complete response on repeat staging. A debulking hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic peritonectomy and small bowel nodule excision were performed. The diagnosis of PPC was confirmed when no malignancy was found in the pelvic organs. The presence of intraluminal colonic metastasis with PPC is exceedingly rare with this being only the third such case in the literature.

Oncological Outcomes After Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new surgical technique for the treatment of initially unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Our objective was to assess its oncological outcomes. METHODS: Between July 2016 and September 2020, data from 100 PIPAC procedures with oxaliplatin or doxorubicin-cisplatin in 49 patients with PC (all etiologies) were analyzed. We studied the evolution of the peritoneal cancer index (PCI), the need for radical surgery (R0), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The patients' median age was 65 (59; 71) years, and 55.1% were women. Median PIPAC procedures per patient were 2 (1-3), and 28 (57.1%) underwent more than one PIPAC procedure. Median PCI at the first PIPAC was 19 (15-22). PCI decreased for 37%, remained stable for 29.6%, and increased for 33.4% patients. Four (8.3%) underwent radical R0 surgery after PIPAC. After a median follow-up of 16.1 months (1.5-90.1), the median overall survival from PC diagnosis was 29.1 months (14.8-34.3), with a median gastric and colorectal PC survival of 11.3 (7.2-34.3) and 29.1 months (16.1-31) respectively. Overall survival after the first PIPAC session was 11.6 months (6-17.3), with median survival after gastric and colorectal PCs being 6 (2.9-15.5) and 13.3 months (5-17.6), respectively. Stratification of patients according to the number of lines of systemic chemotherapy, PIPAC procedures, and the chronology of PC onset did not result in a significant difference in survival. CONCLUSION: The OS was in line with the literature. PIPAC could delay oncological progression and improve survival. These encouraging results justify the ongoing and future evaluations of PIPAC by prospective randomized trials.

Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: A Rare Malignancy Presenting a Diagnostic Challenge.

With the advancement in technologies and the development of a vast variety of tests, diagnosing diseases has become relatively easy. However, certain diseases are challenging to diagnose due to their similarities with other disease processes. Primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) is one of the infrequent tumors that has a resemblance to an ovarian tumor, often making it hard to diagnose. The symptoms are non-specific, and by the time primary peritoneal cancer is diagnosed, the patient is usually at an advanced stage. Although diagnosis might be suspected based on presenting symptoms, it is rarely confirmed with symptomatology alone, requiring additional tumor markers or radiological studies. Sometimes it is diagnosed after surgical removal of the lesion. Several similarities have been described between PPC and ovarian cancer, with some studies explaining the differences as well. We highlight the importance of careful interpretation of imaging studies for the timely diagnosis of PPC. However, several factors can interfere with the analysis of test results leading to delays in diagnosis and management. Interpretation of imaging becomes difficult, especially in patients with significant ascites.

Assessment of postoperative pain after pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the treatment of peritoneal metastasis.

PURPOSE: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new surgical technique, for the treatment of initially unresectable peritoneal metastasis (PM). Our objective was to assess postoperative pain and morbidity. METHODS: Between July 2016 and September 2020, data from 100 consecutive PIPAC procedures with oxaliplatin (PIPAC Ox) or doxorubicin-cisplatin (PIPAC C/D) in 49 patients with PM (all etiologies) were analyzed. Pain was self-assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0-10. RESULTS: The median PIPAC procedures per patient were 2 [1-3]. Patients indicated greatest pain at 4 pm on the day of the procedure (D0) and on postoperative D1 at 8 am and 4 pm. Postprocedural moderate-to-severe pain (VAS 4-10) was more frequent with PIPAC Ox than with PIPAC C/D, respectively 14 (36.8%) vs 7 (13.5%); p = 0.010. Hospitalization was longer for patients with moderate-to-severe pain than for others (median 4 days [3-7] vs 3 days [2-4], p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis identified oxaliplatin as a factor associated with greater pain (OR [95% CI], 2.95 [1.10-7.89]. Opiate administration was similar after PIPAC Ox and PIPAC C/D procedures, p = 0.477. CONCLUSION: PIPAC was well-tolerated, and pain was well-controlled in the majority of patients. Pain was greatest at 4 pm on D0 and 8 am and 4 pm on D1. PIPAC Ox is associated with greater pain than PIPAC C/D, independently of opiate treatment. Moderate-to-severe pain was associated with longer hospital stays.

Primary peritoneal carcinoma and ovarian carcinoma - a ten-year comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) at presentation often masquerades as epithelial ovarian carcinoma (OC) but behaves different with respect to treatment response, recurrence patterns and has inferior outcomes. The objective of this study is to compare the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of PPC and OC. METHODS: Prospectively maintained database of patients presenting to the gynecologic oncology department at a tertiary hospital was reviewed between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2020. A comparative analysis of high-grade serous stage III/IV PPC and OC was done. Demographics, treatment details, complications and survival outcomes were collected from electronic medical records. RESULTS: 151 OC and 69 PPC patients were included. A higher proportion of women with PPC had reduced performance status prior to hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy, a shorter symptom to treatment interval, and large volume ascites. A significantly lower number of women with PPC (4.3 vs. 46.1%; P < 0.001) underwent primary cytoreduction, had a lower median surgical complexity score (3 vs. 4; P < 0.001) but higher recurrence rates (66.7 vs. 47.0%; P = 0.041) as compared to the patients with OC. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 (15-20) months in PPC and 23 (17-28) months in OC patients (log-rank P = 0.034), while the median overall survival (OS) was similar (44 vs. 48 months; log-rank P = 0.696). The presence of extraperitoneal disease and interval cytoreduction was associated with shorter PFS. Suboptimal cytoreduction and delay in adjuvant chemotherapy beyond 6 weeks post-surgery was associated with reduced OS. CONCLUSION: PPC is an aggressive disease with lower PFS compared to OC. Commonly presenting with large volume carcinomatosis, it is not amenable for primary cytoreduction, making the usage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy a common practice and pragmatic approach.

Genomic catastrophe, the peritoneal cavity and ovarian cancer prevention.

The current theory of carcinogenesis for the deadliest of 'ovarian' cancers-high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC)-holds that the malignancy develops first in the fallopian tube and spreads to the ovaries, peritoneum, and/or regional lymph nodes. This is based primarily on the observation of early forms of serous neoplasia (serous tubal intraepithelial lesions [STILs], and serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas [STICS]) in the fimbria of women undergoing risk reduction surgery. However, these lesions are uncommon in the general population, confer a low risk (5%) of HGSC following their removal in at-risk women with germ-line BRCA1/2 mutations, and require 4 or more years to recur as intraperitoneal HGSC. These features suggest that isolated STILs and STICs behave as precursors, with uncertain cancer risk rather than carcinomas. Their evolution to HGSC within, or after, escape from the tube could proceed stepwise with multiple biologic events; however, it is unclear whether tubal or ovarian HGSCs encountered in the setting of advanced disease evolved in the same fashion. The latter scenario could also be explained by a 'catastrophic' model in which STICs suddenly develop with invasive and metastatic potential, overwhelming or obscuring the site of origin. Moreover, a similar model might explain the sudden emergence of HGSC in the peritoneal cavity following escape of precursor cells years before. Long-term follow-up data from opportunistic or prophylactic salpingectomy should shed light on where malignant transformation occurs, as well as the timeline from precursor to metastatic HGSC. © 2022 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cutaneous and Cerebral Metastases From Primary Peritoneal Clear Cell Carcinoma.

Peritoneal tumors are very uncommon and among them, primary peritoneal clear cell carcinoma is extremely rare and often misdiagnosed as others subtypes. There are only 13 cases of primary peritoneal clear cell carcinoma previously reported in the literature and there are no reports about cutaneous metastasis in this setting and only brain metastases were described to be associated with other primary peritoneal carcinoma subtypes. More information about this topic is needed and so we are presenting a new case of primary peritoneal clear cell carcinoma with cutaneous and cerebral metastases in a 34-year-old female.

Primary Peritoneal Carcinosarcoma With Metastasis to the Umbilicus and Pancreas.

A 51-year-old woman visited our hospital after being diagnosed with ascites effusion by her previous physician due to weight gain for 6 months. Ascites cytology showed adenocarcinoma, MRI showed an omental cake, and CT showed neoplastic lesions in the umbilicus and pancreas. Laparoscopy revealed that the omentum had been replaced by a tumor. Biopsies of the omentum and umbilicus revealed a carcinosarcoma. Treatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin was unsuccessful, and the patient's general condition deteriorated, leading to her demise. Pathological autopsy revealed carcinosarcoma of peritoneal origin metastasizing to the umbilicus and tail of the pancreas. No tumors were found in the uterus, ovaries, or fallopian tubes.

Effect of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy on the Survival Rate of Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Gastric Origin.

INTRODUCTION: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new surgical technique for the treatment of initially unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Our objective was to compare the results of PIPAC associated with systemic chemotherapy (PIPAC_CHEM) with those of systemic chemotherapy alone (ONLY_CHEM) in patients with gastric PC without metastasis other than peritoneal, and the WHO performance status < 3. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single center, comparative non-randomized study. Seventeen PIPAC_CHEM patients were compared to 29 ONLY_CHEM patients. The primary endpoint was overall survival at 6 months from diagnosis of PC. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were screened and 46 were included (PIPAC_CHEM, n = 17; ONLY_CHEM, n = 29). The PIPAC_ CHEM population was significantly younger (median 64 years [56; 68] vs 74 years [61; 79]; p = 0.0054). Median PIPAC session per patient is 2 [1-3]. Six-month survival was significantly higher in the PIPAC_CHEM group than in the ONLY_CHEM group 16/17 (94.1% [65-99.2]) vs 19/29 (65.5% [45.4-79.7]), respectively; p = 0.029. Over the entire follow-up, median survival [95% CI] was 12.8 months [7.2-34.3] with PIPAC vs 9.1 months [5.4-11.5] without, p = 0.056. At 6 months, median length of additional hospitalization was significantly less for PIPAC_CHEM (median 2 days [2-7]) than without PIPAC (median 11 days [3-21]) (p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: The overall survival at 6 months after the diagnosis of carcinomatosis was significantly better for PIPAC_CHEM patients. This difference appears to continue until at least 18 months. At 6 months, days of additional hospitalization was significantly less in the PIPAC_CHEM group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT 04,879,953.

Serum HE4 is associated with clinical prognostic factors and survival outcome in female patients with primary peritoneal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether serum HE4 was associated with clinical risk prognostic factors and survival outcome. METHODS: In this study, 72 patients with primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) from January 2011 to October 2019 participated. Serum HE4 and CA125 levels were detected at primary diagnosis, post-surgery, pre-recurrence and the presence of recurrence. The relations between serum HE4 levels with clinical prognostic factors were analyzed, and the hazard ratios between serum HE4 levels with overall survival and recurrence-free survival were also analyzed by univariate and multivariate survival analysis. RESULTS: HE4 and CA125 levels were significantly elevated in serous type, high histological grade, advanced stage and positive lymph node status and residual tumor diameter more than 1 cm, respectively, compared with those in non-serous type, low histological grade, early stage, negative lymph node status and residual tumor diameter no more than 1 cm, respectively. HE4 was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival and overall survival with hazard ratios of 5.36 (95% confidence interval: 2.19-13.15) and 4.48 (95% confidence interval: 1.87-10.74), respectively. CONCLUSION: HE4 is correlated with clinical risk prognostic factors in PPC and is effective in the recurrence detection and predicting outcome in PPC patients.

Can a morphological description of the peritoneal carcinomatosis in advanced ovarian cancer add prognostic information? Analysis of 1686 patients of the tumor bank ovarian cancer.

Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis in ovarian cancer is frequent and generally associated with higher stage and poorer outcome. The clinical features of peritoneal carcinomatosis are diverse and their relevance for surgical and long-term outcome remains unclear. We conducted this prospective study to describe intraoperatively the different features of peritoneal carcinomatosis(PC) and correlate them with clinicopathological features, progression-free(PFS) and overall survival (OS),. Methods: We performed a systematic analysis of all patients with documented intraoperative PC and a primary diagnosis of epithelial ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer from January 2001 to September 2018. All data were evaluated by using the systematic tumor bank tool. Specific PC features included texture(soft-hard), consistency(coarse-fine or both), wet vs dry(PC with ascites vs. PC without ascites), and localization(diffuse-local). PC characteristics were then evaluated for correlation with age, FIGO-stage, histology, lymph-node involvement, grade, and presence of residual tumor at primary surgery. Moreover, the influence of PC characteristics on OS and PFS was analyzed. Results: A total of 1686 patients with PC and primary epithelial ovarian cancer were included. Majority of the patients were characterized by diffuse PC(73.9%). The majority of peritoneal nodules were fine in texture (55.3%) and hard in consistency (87.4%). Moreover, 27.6% of patients had dry PC. Diffuse PC localization was significantly associated with higher FIGO-stage (p<0.001), high-grade (p=0.003) and serous tumors (p=0.006) as well as residual tumor as compared to local PC (p<0.001). Wet PC also significantly correlated with diffuse localization (p <0.001) and residual tumor as compared to dry PC (p<0.001). Coarse PC was significantly associated with residual tumor as compared to fine PC (p=0.044). All other PC features didn´t correlate with clinicopathological features. As for survival outcomes, diffuse peritoneal localization (p<0.001), wet PC (p<0.001), and additional lymph node involvement (p<0.001) were associated with lower OS and PFS rates. Other PC features did not significantly impact survival. Conclusion: Diffuse localization of peritoneal carcinomatosis was significant predictor of recurrence. Lower OS and PFS were associated with diffuse peritoneal localization, wet PC, and additional lymph node involvement. Further prospective trials are warranted with the inclusion of translational research aspects to better understand the different peritoneal carcinomatosis patterns.