Hypofractionated proton and carbon ion beam radiotherapy for sacrococcygeal chordoma (ISAC): An open label, randomized, stratified, phase II trial.

INTRODUCTION: Sacrococcygeal chordomas have high recurrence rates and are challenging to treat. METHODS: In this phase II prospective, randomized, stratified trial, the safety and feasibility of hypofractionated ion radiation therapy were investigated. The primary focus was monitored through the incidence of Grade 3-5 NCI-CTC-AE toxicity. Secondary endpoints included local progression-free (LPFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The study enrolled 82 patients with primary (87 %) and recurrent (13 %) inoperable or incompletely resected sacral chordomas from January 2013 to July 2022, divided equally into proton therapy (Arm A) and carbon ion beam therapy (Arm B) groups, each receiving a total dose of 64 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions, 5-6 fractions per week. Overall 74 % of patients received no previous surgery and 66 % of tumors were confirmed by a brachyury staining. The mean and median Gross Tumor Volume at the time of treatment (GTV) was 407 ml and 185 ml, respectively. The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 44.7 months, and the 2-year and 4-year OS rates were 96 % and 81 %, respectively. Factors such as smaller GTV and younger age trended towards better OS. The LPFS after 2-year and 4-year was 84 % and 70 %, respectively. Male gender emerged as a significant predictor of LPFS. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups. We observed five grade 4 wound healing disorders (6 %). CONCLUSION: The initial response rates were promising; however local control was not sustained. More comparative research on fractionation schemes is essential to refine treatment approaches for inoperable sacral chordoma.

Definitive results of a prospective non-randomized phase 2 study on stereotactic body radiation therapy (sbrt) for medically inoperable lung and liver oligometastases from breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To report mature results for local control and survival in oligometastatic (OM) breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on lung and/or liver lesions in a phase II trial. METHODS: This is a prospective non-randomized phase II trial (NCT02581670) which enrolled patients from 2015 to 2021. Eligibility criteria included: age > 18 years, ECOG 0-2, diagnosis of breast cancer, maximum of 4 lung/liver lesions (with a maximum diameter < 5 cm), metastatic disease confined to the lungs and liver or extrapulmonary or extrahepatic disease stable or responding to systemic therapy. The primary end-points were local control (LC) and treatment-related toxicities. The secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), time to next systemic therapy (TTNS), poly-progression free survival (PPFS). RESULTS: The study included 64 patients with a total of 90 lesions treated with SBRT. LC at 1 and 2 years was 94.9 %, 91 % at 3 years. Median local control was not reached. Median OS was 16.5 months, OS at 1, 2 and 3 years was 87.5 %, 60.9 % and 51.9 %, respectively. Median DMFS was 8.3 months, DMFS at 1, 2 and 3 years was 38.1 %, 20.6 % and 16 % respectively. At univariate analysis, local response to SBRT was found to be statistically linked with better OS, DMFS and STFS. CONCLUSION: SBRT is a safe and valid option in oligometastatic breast cancer patients, with very high rates of local control. An optimal selection of patients is likely needed to improve survival outcomes and reduce the rate of distant progression.

Optimal futility stopping boundaries for binary endpoints.

BACKGROUND: Group sequential designs incorporating the option to stop for futility at the time point of an interim analysis can save time and resources. Thereby, the choice of the futility boundary importantly impacts the design's resulting performance characteristics, including the power and probability to correctly or wrongly stop for futility. Several authors contributed to the topic of selecting good futility boundaries. For binary endpoints, Simon's designs (Control Clin Trials 10:1-10, 1989) are commonly used two-stage designs for single-arm phase II studies incorporating futility stopping. However, Simon's optimal design frequently yields an undesirably high probability of falsely declaring futility after the first stage, and in Simon's minimax design often a high proportion of the planned sample size is already evaluated at the interim analysis leaving only limited benefit in case of an early stop. METHODS: This work focuses on the optimality criteria introduced by Schüler et al. (BMC Med Res Methodol 17:119, 2017) and extends their approach to binary endpoints in single-arm phase II studies. An algorithm for deriving optimized futility boundaries is introduced, and the performance of study designs implementing this concept of optimal futility boundaries is compared to the common Simon's minimax and optimal designs, as well as modified versions of these designs by Kim et al. (Oncotarget 10:4255-61, 2019). RESULTS: The introduced optimized futility boundaries aim to maximize the probability of correctly stopping for futility in case of small or opposite effects while also setting constraints on the time point of the interim analysis, the power loss, and the probability of stopping the study wrongly, i.e. stopping the study even though the treatment effect shows promise. Overall, the operating characteristics, such as maximum sample size and expected sample size, are comparable to those of the classical and modified Simon's designs and sometimes better. Unlike Simon's designs, which have binding stopping rules, the optimized futility boundaries proposed here are not adjusted to exhaust the full targeted nominal significance level and are thus still valid for non-binding applications. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of the futility boundary and the time point of the interim analysis have a major impact on the properties of the study design. Therefore, they should be thoroughly investigated at the planning stage. The introduced method of selecting optimal futility boundaries provides a more flexible alternative to Simon's designs with non-binding stopping rules. The probability of wrongly stopping for futility is minimized and the optimized futility boundaries don't exhibit the unfavorable properties of an undesirably high probability of falsely declaring futility or a high proportion of the planned sample evaluated at the interim time point.

Carboplatin in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with molecular alterations of the DNA damage repair pathway: the PRO-CARBO phase II trial.

Introduction: DNA damage repair genes are altered in 20-35% of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Poly-ADP (Adénosine Diphosphate)-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) showed significant activity for these selected tumors, especially with homologous recombination repair (HRR) deficiency. These alterations could also predict platinum sensitivity. Although carboplatin was inconclusive in unselected mCRPC, the literature suggests an anti-tumoral activity in mCRPC with HHR gene alterations. We aimed to assess the efficacy of carboplatin monotherapy in mCRPC patients with HRR deficiency. Methods: This prospective multicenter single-arm two-stage phase II addressed mCRPC men with HRR somatic and/or germline alterations, pretreated with ⩾2 taxane chemotherapy regimens and one androgen receptor pathway inhibitor. Prior PARPi treatment was allowed. Enrolled patients received intravenous carboplatin (AUC5) every 21 days for 6-9 cycles. The primary endpoint was the best response rate according to adapted PCWG3 guidelines: radiological response (RECIST 1.1 criteria) and/or biological response [⩾50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline]. Results: A total of 15 out of 16 enrolled patients started carboplatin treatment. Genomic alterations were identified for BRCA2 (n = 5), CDK12 (n = 3), ATM (n = 3) CHEK2 (n = 2), CHEK1 (n = 1), and BRCA1 (n = 1) genes. Objective response (partial biological response + stable radiological response) was achieved in one patient (6.7%), carrying a BRCA2 mutation and not pre-treated with PARPi; stable disease was observed for five patients (33.5%). Among seven patients (46.7%) with previous PARPi treatment, four patients (57.1%) had a stable disease. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 1.9 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.8-9.5] and 8.6 months (95% CI, 4.3-19.5), respectively. The most common severe (grade 3-4) treatment-related toxicities were thrombocytopenia (66.7%), anemia (66.7%), and nausea (60%). Overall, 8 (53.3%) patients experienced a severe hematological event. Conclusion: The study was prematurely stopped as pre-planned considering the limited activity of carboplatin monotherapy in heavily pre-treated, HHR-deficient mCRPC patients. Larger experience is needed in mCRPC with BRCA alterations. Trial registration: NCT03652493, EudraCT ID number 2017-004764-35.

Brightline-2: a phase IIa/IIb trial of brigimadlin (BI 907828) in advanced biliary tract cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or other solid tumors.

Mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) is a key negative regulator of the tumor suppressor p53. Blocking the MDM2-p53 interaction, and restoring p53 function, is therefore a potential therapeutic strategy in MDM2-amplified, TP53 wild-type tumors. MDM2 is amplified in several tumor types, including biliary tract cancer (BTC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), lung adenocarcinoma and bladder cancer, all of which have limited treatment options and poor patient outcomes. Brigimadlin (BI 907828) is a highly potent MDM2-p53 antagonist that has shown promising activity in preclinical and early-phase clinical studies. This manuscript describes the rationale and design of an ongoing phase IIa/IIb Brightline-2 trial evaluating brigimadlin as second-line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic BTC, PDAC, lung adenocarcinoma, or bladder cancer.

Brightline-2: a phase IIa/IIb trial of brigimadlin (BI 907828) in advanced BTC, PDAC, or other solid tumorsIn some types of cancer, including cancers of the bile duct, pancreas, bladder and lung, the number of copies of a gene called MDM2 is abnormally increased (MDM2 amplification). MDM2 usually regulates p53, a protein that stops cancer cells from growing uncontrollably. When MDM2 is amplified, the cell makes too much of the MDM2 protein, which prevents p53 from stopping cancer growth. Blocking the interaction between MDM2 and p53 may allow p53 to do its job again and stop cancer cells from growing.Brightline-2 is a clinical trial that is currently in progress. This trial is assessing the efficacy and safety of an investigational drug, brigimadlin (or BI 907828), in patients with selected advanced or metastatic cancers. To be included, patients must have advanced biliary tract cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, bladder cancer, or lung adenocarcinoma. The tumor must show amplification of MDM2 when tested by a laboratory. Patients will take a 45 mg tablet of brigimadlin by mouth, once every 3 weeks. In this trial, researchers are investigating the ability of the drug to shrink tumors, the side effects of the drug, and the impact of the drug on a patients' quality of life.The goal of this trial is to assess the potential of brigimadlin as a new treatment option for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, bladder cancer, or lung adenocarcinoma.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05512377 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Bayesian phase II adaptive randomization by jointly modeling efficacy and toxicity as time-to-event outcomes.

The main goals of Phase II trials are to identify the therapeutic efficacy of new treatments and continue monitoring all the possible adverse effects. In Phase II trials, it is important to develop an adaptive randomization (AR) procedure that takes into account both the efficacy and toxicity. In most existing articles, toxicity is modeled as a binary endpoint through an unobservable random effect (frailty) to link the efficacy and toxicity. However, this approach does not capture toxicity profiles that evolve over time. In this article, we propose a new Bayesian adaptive randomization (BAR) procedure using the covariate-adjusted efficacy-toxicity ratio (ETR) index, where efficacy and toxicity are jointly modelled as time-to-event (TTE) outcomes. Furthermore, we also propose early stopping rules for toxicity and futility such that inferior treatments can be dropped at earlier time of trial. Simulation results show that compared to the BAR procedures based solely on the efficacy and that based on TTE efficacy and binary toxicity outcomes, the proposed BAR procedure can better identify the difference in treatment toxicity such that it can assign more patients to the superior treatment arm under some scenarios.

The Meteoritics Trial: efficacy of methotrexate after remission-induction with tocilizumab and glucocorticoids in giant cell arteritis-study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids (GC) are the standard treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA), even though they are associated with adverse side effects and high relapse rates. Tocilizumab (TCZ), an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, has shown promise in sustaining remission and reducing the cumulative GC dosage, but it increases the risk of infections and is expensive. After discontinuation of TCZ, only about half of patients remain in remission. Additionally, only few studies have been conducted looking at remission maintenance, highlighting the need for alternative strategies to maintain remission in GCA. Methotrexate (MTX) has been shown to significantly decrease the risk of relapse in new-onset GCA and is already a proven safe drug in many rheumatologic diseases. METHODS: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MTX in maintaining remission in patients with GCA who have previously been treated with GC and at least 6 months with TCZ. We hypothesize that MTX can maintain remission in GCA patients, who have achieved stable remission after treatment with GC and TCZ, and prevent the occurrence of relapses. The study design is a monocentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase II trial randomizing 40 GCA patients 1:1 into a MTX or placebo arm. Patients will receive 17.5 mg MTX/matching placebo weekly by subcutaneous injection for 12 months, with the possibility of dose reduction if clinically needed. A 6-month follow-up will take place. The primary endpoint is the time to first relapse in the MTX group versus placebo during the 12-month treatment period. Secondary outcomes include patient- and investigator-reported outcomes and laboratory findings, as well as the prevalence of aortitis, number of vasculitic vessels, and change in intima-media thickness during the study. DISCUSSION: This is the first clinical trial evaluating remission maintenance of GCA with MTX after a previous treatment cycle with TCZ. Following the discontinuation of TCZ in GCA, MTX could be a safe and inexpensive drug. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05623592. Registered on 21 November 2022. EU Clinical Trials Register, 2022-501058-12-00. German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00030571.

A randomised phase II trial of temozolomide with or without cannabinoids in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (ARISTOCRAT): protocol for a multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common adult malignant brain tumour, with an incidence of 5 per 100,000 per year in England. Patients with tumours showing O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation represent around 40% of newly diagnosed GBM. Relapse/tumour recurrence is inevitable. There is no agreed standard treatment for patients with GBM, therefore, it is aimed at delaying further tumour progression and maintaining health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Limited clinical trial data exist using cannabinoids in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in this setting, but early phase data demonstrate prolonged overall survival compared to TMZ alone, with few additional side effects. Jazz Pharmaceuticals (previously GW Pharma Ltd.) have developed nabiximols (trade name Sativex®), an oromucosal spray containing a blend of cannabis plant extracts, that we aim to assess for preliminary efficacy in patients with recurrent GBM. METHODS: ARISTOCRAT is a phase II, multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial to assess cannabinoids in patients with recurrent MGMT methylated GBM who are suitable for treatment with TMZ. Patients who have relapsed ≥ 3 months after completion of initial first-line treatment will be randomised 2:1 to receive either nabiximols or placebo in combination with TMZ. The primary outcome is overall survival time defined as the time in whole days from the date of randomisation to the date of death from any cause. Secondary outcomes include overall survival at 12 months, progression-free survival time, HRQoL (using patient reported outcomes from QLQ-C30, QLQ-BN20 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires), and adverse events. DISCUSSION: Patients with recurrent MGMT promoter methylated GBM represent a relatively good prognosis sub-group of patients with GBM. However, their median survival remains poor and, therefore, more effective treatments are needed. The phase II design of this trial was chosen, rather than phase III, due to the lack of data currently available on cannabinoid efficacy in this setting. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will ensure an unbiased robust evaluation of the treatment and will allow potential expansion of recruitment into a phase III trial should the emerging phase II results warrant this development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: 11460478. CLINICALTRIALS: Gov: NCT05629702.

The JAVELIN Bladder Medley trial: avelumab-based combinations as first-line maintenance in advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Results from JAVELIN Bladder 100 established avelumab (anti-PD-L1) first-line maintenance as the standard-of-care treatment for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) that has not progressed with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. We describe the design of JAVELIN Bladder Medley (NCT05327530), an ongoing phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, umbrella trial. Overall, 252 patients with advanced UC who are progression-free following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy will be randomized 1:2:2:2 to receive maintenance therapy with avelumab alone (control group) or combined with sacituzumab govitecan (anti-Trop-2/topoisomerase inhibitor conjugate), M6223 (anti-TIGIT) or NKTR-255 (recombinant human IL-15). Primary end points are progression-free survival per investigator and safety/tolerability of the combination regimens. Secondary end points include overall survival, objective response and duration of response per investigator, and pharmacokinetics.

Urothelial cancer develops in the urinary tract, which contains the parts of the body that move urine from the kidneys to outside of the body. Urothelial cancer is called advanced when it has spread outside of the urinary tract. Chemotherapy is often the first main treatment given to people with advanced urothelial cancer. Avelumab is an immunotherapy drug that can help the body's immune system find and destroy cancer cells. Results from a trial called JAVELIN Bladder 100 looked at avelumab maintenance treatment, which is given after chemotherapy. The trial showed that avelumab maintenance treatment helped people with advanced urothelial cancer live longer than people who were not treated with avelumab. Avelumab also helped people have a longer time without their cancer getting worse. Avelumab is the only approved maintenance treatment available for people with advanced urothelial cancer that has not worsened after chemotherapy. The JAVELIN Bladder Medley trial will assess whether avelumab maintenance treatment given in combination with other anticancer drugs can help people with advanced urothelial cancer live longer and have a longer time without their cancer getting worse compared with avelumab alone. Researchers will also look at the side effects people have when they receive avelumab alone or combined with the other anticancer drugs in this trial. Results will show whether the benefit of avelumab maintenance treatment can be improved by combining avelumab with other anticancer drugs. People started joining this trial in August 2022. Results will be reported in the future. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05327530 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Pemetrexed plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (KCSG-BR15-17): A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic breast cancer refractory to anthracycline and taxanes often shows rapid progression. The development of effective and tolerable combination regimens for these patients is needed. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy of pemetrexed plus vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, phase II trial was conducted in 17 centers in Korea. Patients with advanced breast cancer who had previously been treated with anthracyclines and taxanes were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vinorelbine or pemetrexed plus vinorelbine. Randomization was stratified by prior capecitabine treatment and hormone receptor status. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate, overall survival, safety, and quality of life. RESULTS: Between March 2017 and August 2019, a total of 125 patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up duration of 14.1 months, 118 progression events and 88 death events had occurred. Sixty-two patients were assigned to the pemetrexed plus vinorelbine arm, and 63 were assigned to the vinorelbine arm. Pemetrexed plus vinorelbine significantly prolonged PFS compared to vinorelbine (5.7 vs. 1.5 months, p < 0.001). The combination arm had higher disease control rate (76.8% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.001) and a tendency toward longer overall survival (16.8 vs. 10.5 months, p = 0.102). Anemia was more frequent in the pemetrexed plus vinorelbine arm per cycle compared with vinorelbine (7.9% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001), but there was no difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia per cycle between the pemetrexed plus vinorelbine arm and the vinorelbine single arm (14.7% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.066). CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study showed that pemetrexed plus vinorelbine led to a longer PFS than vinorelbine. Adverse events of pemetrexed plus vinorelbine were generally manageable.

A Phase II Study of 131I-rituximab for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Marginal Zone Lymphoma.

Background: Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a rare treatment option for relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We investigated the safety and efficacy of 131I-rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphomas. Methods: Patients with pathologically confirmed marginal zone lymphoma who relapsed or were resistant to prior therapy were enrolled. The patients received 250 mg/m2 of unlabeled rituximab immediately before receiving a therapeutic 131I-rituximab dose. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints were toxicity assessment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Ten patients (median age = 57.5 years; range = 32-71) were included. Owing to poor enrollment, only 10 of the initially intended 25 patients were included in the study, rendering it unfeasible to perform the primary endpoint analysis. Before RIT, patients received chemotherapy, with 40% (n = 4) receiving rituximab therapy. Median PFS and OS were 18.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0-38.9) and 100.0 months (95% CI: 39.8-160.1), respectively. The ORR was 90%, and the duration of response was 29.7 months (95% CI: 0.0-61.3). Considering a median follow-up of 78.5 months (95% CI: 42.7-114.3), 4 patients (40%) were diagnosed with secondary malignancy. Hematological toxicities were common treatment-related adverse events, and 60% and 50% of the patients experienced grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, respectively. Conclusions: 131I-rituximab showed marked efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma, with a considerable risk of secondary malignancies during long-term follow-up. Radioimmunotherapy is not a recommended treatment option for relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma but may be considered when other treatment options are not feasible.

Preoperative sequential short-course radiation therapy and FOLFOX chemotherapy versus long-course chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SOLAR trial).

BACKGROUND: Preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy has been widely used as an effective treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), leading to a significant reduction in pelvic recurrence rates. Because early administration of intensive chemotherapy for LARC has more advantages than adjuvant chemotherapy, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has been introduced and evaluated to determine whether it can improve tumor response or treatment outcomes. This study aims to investigate whether short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by intensive chemotherapy improves oncologic outcomes compared with traditional preoperative long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: A multicenter randomized phase II trial involving 364 patients with LARC (cT3-4, cN+, or presence of extramural vascular invasion) will be conducted. Patients will be randomly assigned to the experimental or control arm at a ratio of 1:1. Participants in the experimental arm will receive SCRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions, daily) followed by four cycles of FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid) as a neoadjuvant treatment, and those in the control arm will receive conventional radiotherapy (45-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions, 5 times a week) concurrently with capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil. As a mandatory surgical procedure, total mesorectal excision will be performed 2-5 weeks from the last cycle of chemotherapy in the experimental arm and 6-8 weeks after the last day of radiotherapy in the control arm. The primary endpoint is 3-year disease-free survival, and the secondary endpoints are tumor response, overall survival, toxicities, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: This is the first Korean randomized controlled study comparing SCRT-based TNT with traditional preoperative LC-CRT for LARC. The involvement of experienced colorectal surgeons ensures high-quality surgical resection. SCRT followed by FOLFOX chemotherapy is expected to improve disease-free survival compared with CRT, with potential advantages in tumor response, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at Clinical Research Information under the identifier Service KCT0004874 on April 02, 2020, and at Clinicaltrial.gov under the identifier NCT05673772 on January 06, 2023.

Capecitabine maintenance therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with no evidence of disease: CAMCO trial.

Background: In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) exhibiting no evidence of disease (NED), this study assessed the efficacy and safety of capecitabine maintenance therapy. Methods: The single-arm, phase II CAMCO trial enrolled mCRC-NED patients after first-line treatment, administering oral capecitabine maintenance for 1 year. Results: A total of 93 patients were enrolled. The primary end point, 3-year disease-free survival, yielded a rate of 51.6% (95% CI: 41.3-62.0%). Secondary end points included a 3-year overall survival rate of 83.9% (95% CI: 76.3-91.5%). Grade 3 adverse events (AE) were observed in seven patients (7.5%). Predominantly grade 1 and 2, the most common AE was hand-foot syndrome. Conclusion: In mCRC-NED patients, capecitabine maintenance demonstrated a manageable 3-year disease-free survival rate of 51.6%, accompanied by manageable AEs. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01880658 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with FOLFOX/CAPOX plus bevacizumab for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (the iPac-02 trial): study protocol of a single arm, multicenter, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: The safety of intraperitoneally administrated paclitaxel (op PTX) was demonstrated in the phase I trial of ip PTX combined with conventional systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Moreover, the median survival time was 29.3 months, which was longer than that observed in previous studies. Here, we planned the phase II trial of ip PTX: the iPac-02 trial. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, single assignment interventional clinical study includes patients with colorectal cancer with unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis. FOLFOX-bevacizumab or CAPOX-bevacizumab is administered concomitantly as systemic chemotherapy. PTX 20 mg/m2 is administered weekly through the peritoneal access port in addition to these conventional systemic chemotherapies. The response rate is the primary endpoint. Progression-free survival, overall survival, peritoneal cancer index improvement rate, rate of negative peritoneal lavage cytology, safety, and response rate to peritoneal metastases are the secondary endpoints. A total of 38 patients are included in the study. In the interim analysis, the study will continue to the second stage if at least 4 of the first 14 patients respond to the study treatment. The study has been registered at the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2031220110). RESULTS: We previously conducted phase I trial of ip PTX combined with conventional systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis [1]. In the study, three patients underwent mFOLFOX, bevacizumab, and weekly ip PTX, and the other three patients underwent CAPOX, bevacizumab, and weekly ip PTX treatment. The dose of PTX was 20 mg/m [2]. The primary endpoint was the safety of the chemotherapy, and secondary endpoints were response rate, peritoneal cancer index improvement rate, rate of negative peritoneal lavage cytology, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Dose limiting toxicity was not observed, and the adverse events of ip PTX combined with oxaliplatin-based systemic chemotherapy were similar to those described in previous studies using systemic chemotherapy alone [3, 4]. The response rate was 25%, peritoneal cancer index improvement rate was 50%, and cytology in peritoneal lavage turned negative in all the cases. The progression-free survival was 8.8 months (range, 6.8-12 months), and median survival time was 29.3 months [5], which was longer than that observed in previous studies. CONCLUSION: Here, we planned the phase II trial of ip paclitaxel combined with conventional chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: the iPac-02 trial.

Neoadjuvant Pyrotinib plus Trastuzumab, Docetaxel, and Carboplatin in Early or Locally Advanced Human Epidermal Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer in China: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Trial.

INTRODUCTION: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial compared the efficacy, and safety of adding pyrotinib to trastuzumab, docetaxel, and carboplatin versus placebo, trastuzumab, docetaxel, and carboplatin in Chinese patients with human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03756064). METHODS: Sixty-nine women with HER2-positive early (T1-3, N0-1, M0) or locally advanced breast cancer (T2-3, N2 or N3, M0; T4, any N, M0) were recruited from October 1, 2019, to June 1, 2021. Before surgery, patients received 6 cycles of orally pyrotinib (400 mg once per day), trastuzumab (8-mg/kg loading dose and 6-mg/kg maintenance doses), docetaxel (75 mg/m2), and carboplatin (AUC = 6 mg/mL·min) or orally placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel, and carboplatin every 3 weeks. The primary end point was independent review committee-assessed total pathologic complete response rate. The 2-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, stratified by age, hormone receptor status, tumor stage, nodal status, cTNM stage, and Ki-67 level was used to compare rates between treatment groups. RESULTS: In total, 69 female patients were randomized (pyrotinib, 36; and placebo, 33; median age, 53 [31-69] years). In the intention-to-treat population, total pathologic complete response rates were 65.5% (19/29) in the pyrotinib group and 33.3% (10/30) in the placebo group (difference, 32.2%, p = 0.013). Diarrhea was been reported in 86.1% of patients (31/36) in the pyrotinib group as the most common adverse events (AEs) and 15.2% of patients (5/33) in the placebo group. But no grade 4 or 5 AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: Treatment with pyrotinib, trastuzumab, docetaxel, and carboplatin resulted in a statistically significant improvement in the total pathologic complete response rate versus placebo, trastuzumab, docetaxel, and carboplatin for the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer in Chinese patients. Safety data were in line with the known pyrotinib safety profile and generally comparable between treatment groups.

Efficacy and safety of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with S-1 for advanced rectal cancer: a phase II study.

Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with rectal cancer is not yet established in Japan. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative CRT with S-1, a fixed-dose combination of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective, interventional, non-randomized single-center study. Radiotherapy was administered at a total dose of 45 Gy (1.8 Gy in 25 fractions) for five weeks. S-1 was administered orally for nine weeks (five weeks during and four weeks after radiotherapy) at a dose of 80 mg/m2/day. The endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Results: Twenty-eight patients were finally enrolled. The following patient characteristics were recorded: clinical Stage (II: n = 12, III: n = 16), median age (66 years, range 40-77 years), male/female ratio (20/8), and lesion site (Ra-Rb:3/Rb:23/Rb-P:2). Preoperative treatment was completed in 27 patients (96%). Treatment abandonment occurred because of diarrhea. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in one (4%) patient with two events. No serious adverse events occurred in the ≥ 70 years group. The response rate was 68% in all patients and 68% among elderly patients. Radical resection was achieved in all patients, including 19 (68%) who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery. The pCR rate was 11% (three patients). The five-year disease-free survival rate was 68%, and the overall survival rate was 82%. Local recurrence occurred in only one patient five years after surgery. Conclusion: Preoperative CRT with S-1 alone may be a safe and acceptable regimen from the perspective of adverse events and oncological outcomes. Trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000013598. Registered 1 April 2014, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recpt-no=R000015887.

Precision medicine applied to metastatic colorectal cancer using tumor-derived organoids and in-vitro sensitivity testing: a phase 2, single-center, open-label, and non-comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with colorectal metastatic disease have a poor prognosis, limited therapeutic options, and frequent development of resistance. Strategies based on tumor-derived organoids are a powerful tool to assess drug sensitivity at an individual level and to suggest new treatment options or re-challenge. Here, we evaluated the method's feasibility and clinical outcome as applied to patients with no satisfactory treatment options. METHODS: In this phase 2, single-center, open-label, non-comparative study (ClinicalTrials.gov, register NCT03251612), we enrolled 90 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer following progression on or after standard therapy. Participants were 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function, and metastasis available for biopsy. Biopsies from the metastatic site were cultured using organoids model. Sensitivity testing was performed with a panel of drugs with proven activity in phase II or III trials. At the discretion of the investigator considering toxicity, the drug with the highest relative activity was offered. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive without disease progression at two months per local assessment. RESULTS: Biopsies available from 82 to 90 patients were processed for cell culture, of which 44 successfully generated organoids with at least one treatment suggested. The precision cohort of 34 patients started treatment and the primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS) at two months was met in 17 patients (50%, 95% CI 32-68), exceeding the pre-defined level (14 of 45; 31%). The median PFS was 67 days (95% CI 51-108), and the median overall survival was 189 days (95% CI 103-277). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-derived organoids and in-vitro sensitivity testing were feasible in a cohort of metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint was met, as half of the patients were without progression at two months. Cancer patients may benefit from functional testing using tumor-derived organoids. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, register NCT03251612.

Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial.

Introduction: Since radical treatments in low risk prostate cancer do not improve overall survival in comparison to active surveillance, preserving quality of life (QOL) remains the key objective. Active surveillance of indolent prostate cancer avoids curative treatment side-effects but necessitates repeated biopsies. Focal stereotactic body radiation therapy (focal SBRT) may be an alternative. This non-randomized Phase-II trial examined the feasibility and safety of focal SBRT for low and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Methods: Patients were recruited in 2016-2019 if they had: localized CAPRA ≤ 3 prostate adenocarcinoma; an isolated PIRADS≥4 macroscopic tumor on MRI; WHO Performance Status 0-1; and no major urinary symptoms. 36.25 Gy (80% isodose prescription) were delivered in 5 fractions every other day. Primary outcome was delay between focal SBRT and salvage-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were: acute/late genitourinary/rectal toxicity; biological, clinical and MRI local control; and change in QOL measures. Results: Over a median follow-up of 36 months, salvage prostatectomy in the 24 eligible patients was never required. Three-year biochemical progression-free survival was 96%. The single biochemical recurrence was a small (2-mm) Gleason 6 (3 + 3) lesion in the non-irradiated lobe. All 19 patients with ≥1 post-treatment MRI evaluations demonstrated complete radiological response. Acute/late grade ≥3 toxicities did not occur: all acute toxicities were grade-1 genitourinary (38% patients), grade-2 genitourinary (8%), or grade-1 rectal (13%) toxicities. There was one (4%) late grade-1 genitourinary toxicity. QOL was unchanged at last follow-up, as shown by IPSS (2.86 to 3.29, p>0.05), U-QOL (0.71 to 0.67, p>0.05), and IIEF5 (the 14 initially potent patients maintained potency (IIEF5 > 16)). Conclusion: Focal SBRT is feasible, well-tolerated, and preserves QOL. This innovative robotized approach challenges active surveillance.

A phase II study of neoadjuvant atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients with anthracycline-resistant early-stage triple-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant anti-PD-(L)1 therapy improves the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in unselected triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Given the potential for long-term morbidity from immune-related adverse events (irAEs), optimizing the risk-benefit ratio for these agents in the curative neoadjuvant setting is important. Suboptimal clinical response to initial neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is associated with low rates of pCR (2-5%) and may define a patient selection strategy for neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade. We conducted a single-arm phase II study of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel as the second phase of NAT in patients with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC)-resistant TNBC (NCT02530489). METHODS: Patients with stage I-III, AC-resistant TNBC, defined as disease progression or a < 80% reduction in tumor volume after 4 cycles of AC, were eligible. Patients received atezolizumab (1200 mg IV, Q3weeks × 4) and nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 IV,Q1 week × 12) as the second phase of NAT before undergoing surgery followed by adjuvant atezolizumab (1200 mg IV, Q3 weeks, × 4). A two-stage Gehan-type design was employed to detect an improvement in pCR/residual cancer burden class I (RCB-I) rate from 5 to 20%. RESULTS: From 2/15/2016 through 1/29/2021, 37 patients with AC-resistant TNBC were enrolled. The pCR/RCB-I rate was 46%. No new safety signals were observed. Seven patients (19%) discontinued atezolizumab due to irAEs. CONCLUSION: This study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating a promising signal of activity in this high-risk population (pCR/RCB-I = 46% vs 5% in historical controls), suggesting that a response-adapted approach to the utilization of neoadjuvant immunotherapy should be considered for further evaluation in a randomized clinical trial.

Safety and efficacy of second-line metronomic oral vinorelbine-atezolizumab combination in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: An open-label phase II trial (VinMetAtezo).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of second-line metronomic oral vinorelbine-atezolizumab combination for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm Phase II study performed in patients with advanced NSCLC without activating EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement who progressed after first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Combination treatment was atezolizumab (1200 mg IV day 1, every 3 weeks) and oral vinorelbine (40 mg, 3 times by week). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) during the 4-month follow-up from the first dose of treatment. Statistical analysis was based on the exact single-stage Phase II design defined by A'Hern. Based on literature data, the Phase III trial threshold was set at 36 successes in 71 patients. RESULTS: 71 patients were analyzed (median age, 64 years; male, 66.2%; ex-smokers/active smokers, 85.9%; ECOG performance status 0-1, 90.2%; non-squamous NSCLC, 83.1%; PD-L1 ≥ 50%, 4.4%). After a median follow-up of 8.1 months from treatment initiation, 4-month PFS rate was 32% (95% CI, 22-44), i.e. 23 successes out 71 patients. OS rate was 73.2% at 4 months and 24.3% at 24 months. Median PFS and OS were 2.2 (95% CI, 1.5-3.0) months and 7.9 (95% CI, 4.8-11.4) months, respectively. Overall response rate and disease control rate at 4 months were 11% (95% CI, 5-21) and 32% (95% CI, 22-44), respectively. No safety signal was evidenced. CONCLUSION: Metronomic oral vinorelbine-atezolizumab in the second-line setting did not achieve the predefined PFS threshold. No new safety signal was reported for vinorelbine-atezolizumab combination.