Silicone ring tourniquet could be a substitute for a conventional tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty with a longer surgical field: a prospective comparative study in simultaneous total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of silicon ring tourniquets and conventional pneumatic tourniquets in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The study compared the operation time, total bleeding amount, length from the tourniquet distal end to the patella superior pole (L_TP), and complications related to the two tourniquet application methods and attempted to determine whether the silicon ring tourniquet has advantages over conventional pneumatic tourniquets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective comparative study included 30 patients who underwent bilateral simultaneous TKA for degenerative osteoarthritis in August to December 2021. All patients underwent TKA on one side with a conventional pneumatic tourniquet, while TKA on the other side with a silicon ring tourniquet. The primary outcomes were the L_TP, operation time, tourniquet time, total bleeding amount, total drainage amount, and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score of the tourniquet applied site at 6, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. The secondary outcome was tourniquet-related complications in both groups. RESULTS: L_TP was significantly longer in the silicon ring tourniquet group compared with that in the pneumatic tourniquet group (20.22 ± 2.74 cm versus 15.12 ± 2.40, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in other results. The tourniquet applied site pain was less in the silicon ring tourniquet group (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Silicon ring tourniquet application resulted in better clinical outcomes than conventional pneumatic tourniquets in TKA. Because we can obtain a wider surgical field using silicon ring tourniquets without complications, silicon ring tourniquets could be a substitute for conventional pneumatic tourniquets in total knee arthroplasty or distal femoral surgeries.

Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique improves the efficiency of distal nerve blocks for carpal tunnel release.

BACKGROUND: Axillary block is the standard for carpal tunnel release (CTR), providing effective anesthesia, and tolerance of tourniquet. Conversely, distal blocks are less used due to poor tolerance of tourniquet. Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT), proposed for hand and wrist surgeries, avoids its use. This study assesses the benefits of the addition of WALANT to distal blocks during endoscopic CTR (eCTR). METHODS: This randomized, open-label, controlled trial prospectively enrolled 60 patients scheduled for eCTR. Patients were randomized to receive distal blocks at the wrist combined to either a high arm tourniquet (Distal block group) or a WALANT in the area of surgery (Distal + Walant group). The primary endpoint was the global pain score summing pain scores related to puncture, local anesthetic injection, pneumatic tourniquet, surgical procedure, tourniquet deflation, and residual sensitivity after surgery. RESULTS: Mean global pain score was significantly reduced in the Distal + Walant group (0.5 ± 1.4 vs. 2.2 ± 2.4; p < 0.001). No need for an additional anesthetic procedure was required in the Distal + Walant group. Even if the quality of visualization was high in both groups, it was better in the Distal block group (5 [5-5] vs. 4 [4-5]; p < 0.001). No rescue tourniquet was necessary for the Distal + Walant group. The rate of hematoma 15 days post-surgery was significantly reduced in the Distal + Walant group (20% vs. 57%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of WALANT to distal blocks is adapted for eCTR. This combined technique decreases perioperative pain scores, provides good surgery conditions, and reduces the risk of postoperative hematoma. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY URL: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04494100) on July 31, 2020 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04494100?term=CMC+ambroise+pare&cntry=FR&draw=4&rank=28.

Use of the HemaClear™ elastic tourniquet reduces blood loss in operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures.

BACKGROUND: To determine if the use of a narrower elastic tourniquet compared to a standard pneumatic tourniquet reduces operative blood loss in the operative fixation of humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed at a level I trauma center and included 134 patients, aged 18 to 90 years, with a humeral shaft fracture treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) from January 2007 through June 2018. The primary variable of interest was the application of a HemaClear™ elastic tourniquet versus a standard pneumatic tourniquet during the fixation of a humeral shaft fracture. The primary outcome was estimated blood loss (EBL) during the humerus ORIF surgery as recorded in the operative record. The secondary outcomes were total tourniquet time and operative time. The primary purpose of the study was to compare the above outcomes between the two tourniquet types. RESULTS: Estimated blood loss was 42% lower (95% CI: 11% to 73%, p < 0.01) in the elastic tourniquet group when compared to the standard pneumatic tourniquet group. The use of the elastic tourniquet was also associated with a 67% increase (95% CI: 35% to 100%, p < 0.01) in tourniquet time compared to the standard pneumatic tourniquet. No difference in the total operative time between the two groups (difference, -3%; 95% CI: -21 to 14, p = 0.72) was observed. CONCLUSION: Elastic tourniquet use was associated with 42% less blood loss in the fixation of humeral shaft fractures compared to use of a traditional pneumatic tourniquet, although this may be of unclear clinical importance given the relatively low estimated blood loss in this cohort. The potential benefit of reduced blood loss associated with the narrower elastic tourniquet is likely caused by the increased tourniquet time, without a change in overall operative time.

A survey of the use of tourniquet among orthopaedic surgeons in Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: The modern arterial tourniquet is an automatic tourniquet system which contains many features that help to minimise complications and improve safety. However, the non-pneumatic tourniquet is still in use, a practice that may be commoner in resource-constrained settings. This study was conducted to investigate the types of tourniquet available and used by orthopaedic surgeons in Nigeria as well as the practical aspects and complications of their use of the tourniquet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At an Annual General Meeting/Scientific Conference of Nigerian Orthopaedic Association, a survey was conducted among orthopaedic surgeons using a pre-tested self-administered questionnaire which contained questions on types of tourniquet, practical aspects of the use of tourniquet and complications. RESULTS: The non-pneumatic tourniquet was usually used by 60.2% of the respondents and 58.1% of those who had both pneumatic and non-pneumatic tourniquets used the latter more commonly. In most cases, the tourniquet was applied by surgeons or surgical residents on the arm or thigh. Surgeons who had ever used the tourniquet in diabetic patients were 71.6% while 29.5% had used it in patients with sickle cell disease. Tourniquet duration was usually 1½ h and 2 h in the upper and lower limbs, respectively. The two most common complications were tourniquet palsy and tourniquet pain. CONCLUSIONS: The non-pneumatic tourniquet was more commonly used than the pneumatic tourniquet. Application of the tourniquet on sites other than the thigh and the upper arm were uncommon. The most common complication was neurologic injury.

Incidence and factors influencing tourniquet pain.

PURPOSE: The use of tourniquet in orthopedic surgery facilitates operation by establishing a bloodless surgical field. However, many complications following the use of tourniquets have been reported. Tourniquet pain is the most common complication. This study aimed to find the actual incidence of pain associated with tourniquet use in orthopedic surgery and the various factors. METHODS: It is a prospective observational study conducted on 132 consecutive cases. Patients aged 18-70 years with musculoskeletal problems of the forearm and leg requiring surgery were included in the study. Patients with open injuries or contraindications such as diabetes mellitus, compromised circulatory states, neurological deficit, compartment syndrome and unable to give informed consent were excluded. The parameters assessed included duration of tourniquet use, tourniquet pressure, type of anesthesia, any interval release of the tourniquet and reapplication after a reperfusion period, whether upper or lower limb surgery, severity of tourniquet pain, timing of tourniquet release and complications. Chi-square and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test were used for data analysis. RESULTS: In upper limb surgeries, if duration of surgery was less than 60 min, 14 (51.8%) cases experienced tourniquet pain and 13 (48.1%) had no pain, and if duration of surgery was more than 60 min, 24 (60.0%) had pain and 16 (40.0%) experienced no pain. In lower limb surgeries if duration of surgery was less than 60 min, 2 (7.7%) experienced pain and 24 (92.3%) had no pain, and if duration of surgery was more than 60 min, 14 (35.8%) experienced pain and 25 (64.8%) had no pain. Degree of tourniquet pain increases with the duration of surgery. Statistically, there was significant association between tourniquet inflation time and tourniquet pain in both upper and lower limbs (p = 0.034 and 0.024, respectively) CONCLUSION: Incidence of tourniquet pain was in direct proportion to the duration of tourniquet use and was higher in cases with regional anesthesia. Other risk factors assessed including tourniquet pressure, upper or lower limb surgery, tourniquet release time and interval had no significant contribution to the incidence or severity of tourniquet pain.

Limb Occlusion Pressure Versus Standard Pneumatic Tourniquet Pressure in Open Carpal Tunnel Surgery - A Randomized Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Pneumatic tourniquets are used extensively in orthopedic hand/wrist surgery. Complications, while rare, are associated with elevated pressure and duration of tourniquet use. Limb occlusion pressure (LOP) is the minimum tourniquet pressure at which arterial blood flow is restricted. Therefore, we performed a cross-sectional double-blinded randomized control trial to assess if there is a difference in post-operative pain at the surgical and tourniquet site between LOP and standard tourniquet pressure and if there is a difference in post-operative opioid usage. METHODS: A total of 44 patients (Age 60±13, 30 female, 14 male) were randomized into two groups (LOP, 191±14 mmHg | STP, 250 mmHg) of 22 patients controlling for gender (15 female, seven male). The primary outcome was a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at the tourniquet and surgical sites, recorded for the first two weeks post-operative. Daily pain medication usage was recorded and quantified using oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME). A group-by-time generalized mixed-model ANOVA was used to detect within-group and between group (LOP vs STP) differences in VAS at the surgical and tourniquet sites as well as medication use.  Results: LOP significantly decreased post-operative pain medication usage across the first week (-50%; p<0.05). Both groups had similar VAS pain at the surgery site, but the LOP group had 80% reduced pain at the tourniquet site when averaged across the first post-operative week (p<0.05).  Conclusions: The use of LOP compared to STP elicits reduced post-operative pain at the tourniquet site and reduces post-operative pain medication use in the first post-operative week.

Incidence and factors influencing tourniquet pain / 中华创伤杂志(英文版)

PURPOSE@#The use of tourniquet in orthopedic surgery facilitates operation by establishing a bloodless surgical field. However, many complications following the use of tourniquets have been reported. Tourniquet pain is the most common complication. This study aimed to find the actual incidence of pain associated with tourniquet use in orthopedic surgery and the various factors.@*METHODS@#It is a prospective observational study conducted on 132 consecutive cases. Patients aged 18-70 years with musculoskeletal problems of the forearm and leg requiring surgery were included in the study. Patients with open injuries or contraindications such as diabetes mellitus, compromised circulatory states, neurological deficit, compartment syndrome and unable to give informed consent were excluded. The parameters assessed included duration of tourniquet use, tourniquet pressure, type of anesthesia, any interval release of the tourniquet and reapplication after a reperfusion period, whether upper or lower limb surgery, severity of tourniquet pain, timing of tourniquet release and complications. Chi-square and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test were used for data analysis.@*RESULTS@#In upper limb surgeries, if duration of surgery was less than 60 min, 14 (51.8%) cases experienced tourniquet pain and 13 (48.1%) had no pain, and if duration of surgery was more than 60 min, 24 (60.0%) had pain and 16 (40.0%) experienced no pain. In lower limb surgeries if duration of surgery was less than 60 min, 2 (7.7%) experienced pain and 24 (92.3%) had no pain, and if duration of surgery was more than 60 min, 14 (35.8%) experienced pain and 25 (64.8%) had no pain. Degree of tourniquet pain increases with the duration of surgery. Statistically, there was significant association between tourniquet inflation time and tourniquet pain in both upper and lower limbs (p = 0.034 and 0.024, respectively) CONCLUSION: Incidence of tourniquet pain was in direct proportion to the duration of tourniquet use and was higher in cases with regional anesthesia. Other risk factors assessed including tourniquet pressure, upper or lower limb surgery, tourniquet release time and interval had no significant contribution to the incidence or severity of tourniquet pain.

Elastic pneumatic tourniquet cuff can reduce postoperative thigh pain after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Tourniquet use is associated with complications such as thigh pain, skin problems, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This prospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the pneumatic tourniquet system using an elastic cuff and limb occlusion pressure (LOP) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis of this study was that an elastic cuff tourniquet would result in less postoperative thigh pain after TKA. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial involved a total of 98 patients who underwent primary TKA. They were randomized into two groups: tourniquet system using an elastic cuff and LOP group (Group E) and tourniquet system using a conventional-cuff and LOP group (Group C). Outcomes including postoperative thigh pain assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), serum muscle enzymes, recommended tourniquet pressure (RTP), bloodlessness of surgical field, surgical time, incidence of DVT, and the frequency of rescue analgesic use after surgery, were compared between groups. RESULTS: Patients in Group E experienced significantly less thigh pain compared to those in Group C on postoperative day 4 (P = 0.01) and day 7 (P = 0.04). The difference between RTP and systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in Group E (P = 0.045). One case of thigh DVT was found in Group E, while no such cases were found in Group C. One and two cases of poor bloodless surgical fields were observed in Group E and Group C, respectively. There was no significant difference in surgical time, levels of serum muscle enzymes, and the frequency of rescue analgesic use between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The pneumatic tourniquet system using an elastic cuff and LOP reduced early postoperative thigh pain more effectively than did the tourniquet system using a conventional cuff and LOP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: # KCT0003149 . Registered August 17, 2018 - Retrospectively registered.

Development of a Reproducible Upper Limb Swelling Model.

Background: The purpose of this study was to develop a reproducible upper limb swelling model and quantify the efficacy of changing elevation posture in swelling reduction using this model. Methods: A manual sphygmomanometer was applied to healthy volunteers' upper arms while in a dependent position for 25 minutes to create venous congestion and swelling. Seven different levels of pressure (250, 120, 100, 80, 50, 40 and 30 mmHg) were tested. Every 5 minutes, the level of swelling was measured using the volumetric method. Any complications were recorded. We then compared the swelling reduction potential among 3 limb postures (arm on head, elevation brace, and simple sling). The significance level was set at p < .05. Results: Thirty to forty milliliters of swelling was created for all pressure levels except the 250 and 30 mmHg. All complications including transient nerve palsy, pain and petechiae were severe at 250 and 120 mmHg, less severe at 100 mmHg, mild at 80 mmHg, and absent below 40 mmHg. Both the on head and elevated brace limb postures markedly and significantly decreased swelling greater than the simple sling posture. Conclusions: We found that 20 ml or greater swelling can be reliably created with a blood pressure cuff inflated to 40 mmHg on the upper limb. The on head and elevated brace postures demonstrated a greater degree of swelling reduction than the simple sling posture.

Application effect of pneumatic tourniquet with individualized pressure setting in orthopaedic surgery of extremities: A meta-analysis.

AIMS: To evaluate the application effect of individualized pressure setting strategy of pneumatic tourniquet in orthopaedic surgery. BACKGROUND: Some individualized setting pressures of pneumatic tourniquet are lower than the standard pressure recommended in the textbook (Nursing of Operating Room, People's Military Publishing House, 2008). DESIGN: Meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: CL, WOS, PubMed, CNKI, CBM, VIP and Wan-fang DATA. REVIEW METHODS: We searched studies on the application effect of individualized pressure of pneumatic tourniquet from the establishment date of the databases to September 2017. Study quality was assessed using the quality evaluation method recommended in the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0 (Higgins, 2011). The primary outcome was inflation pressure. RESULTS: We identified nine studies including 1,200 patients. The individualized pressure setting strategy can provide a lower inflation pressure (four studies), improve haemostatic effect (six studies) and reduce the incidence of related complications (eight studies). CONCLUSIONS: An individualized inflation pressure is recommended when using the tourniquet in orthopaedic surgery. And the setting pressure might be a minimum and efficiency one, by accessing the the systolic blood pressure and limb circumferences of the patient. IMPACT: This study addressed that the individualized pressure setting strategy of pneumatic tourniquet can provide a lower inflation pressure and a higher application value in orthopaedic limb surgery. However, greater attention should be focused on how to unify the individualized pressure setting strategy. Meanwhile, the instructions for use from manufacturers need to be updated. Therefore, it is recommended to conduct a large-sample multi-centre high-quality randomized controlled trial in strict accordance with the CONSORT standard.

[Effect of pneumatic tourniquet on perioperative blood loss in total knee arthroplasty].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of pneumatic tourniquet on perioperative period of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: The perioperative period data of 116 patients over 60 years old with severe knee osteoarthritis treated with TKA between January 2018 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether pneumatic tourniquet was used during operation, the patients were divided into trial group (49 cases, pneumatic tourniquet was not used during operation) and control group (67 cases, pneumatic tourniquet was used during operation). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, lesion side, disease duration, and preoperative hemoglobin between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, actual total blood loss, overt blood loss, hidden blood loss, and percentage of hidden blood loss, knee swelling at 3 days after operation, and range of motion of knee at 2 weeks after operation were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The operation time of the trial group was significantly longer than that of the control group ( t=14.013, P=0.000). The actual total blood loss, hidden blood loss, and percentage of hidden blood loss in the trial group were significantly lower than those in the control group ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the overt blood loss between the two groups ( t=-1.293, P=0.200). The knee swelling degree in the trial group was significantly slighter than that in the control group at 3 days after operation, and the range of motion of knee in the trial group was significantly better than that in the control group at 2 weeks after operation ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Pneumatic tourniquet can reduce the operation time of TKA significantly. However, it may increase the hidden blood loss and knee swelling, and negatively impact the recovery of knee function in the early postoperative stage of TKA.

Intraoperative pneumatic tourniquet use may improve the clinical outcomes of arteriovenous fistula creations.

OBJECTIVES: A major pathology affecting the usability of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis is juxta-anastomosis stenosis. Intraoperative pneumatic tourniquet eliminates the use of vascular clamps, reduces vascular trauma, and may then reduce the juxta-anastomosis stenosis. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of arteriovenous fistula creations using the tourniquet-assisted approach versus the clamp-assisted approach. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the outcomes of primary arteriovenous fistulas created by the lead author from 2008 to 2017 and met the specified inclusion criteria applied to both groups. RESULTS: A total of 575 patients were included. Upon comparing the tourniquet group (n = 411) with the clamp group (n = 164): the primary arteriovenous fistula failure rate was significantly lower (2.4% vs 7.3%, p = 0.01); the percentage of arteriovenous fistula used for hemodialysis without initial interventions was significantly higher (71.5% vs 45.1%, p < 0.001) and with initial interventions was conversely lower (26.0% vs 47.6%, p < 0.001); the primary patency rate of the whole fistula conduits was significantly higher (44.2% vs 23.0% at 1 year, p < 0.001) and so was the cumulative patency rate (97.2% vs 92.6% at 1 year, p < 0.001); and the juxta-anastomosis primary patency rate (free of interventions for the juxta-anastomosis region) was higher (71.0% vs 47.8% at 1 year, p < 0.001). Based on multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, the effect of tourniquet use on the juxta-anastomosis primary patency remained significant (hazard ratio = 2.24, 95% confidence interval = 1.72-2.93, p < 0.001) when other significant factors (fistula location, gender, and diabetes) were considered. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative pneumatic tourniquet may significantly improve the clinical outcomes of arteriovenous fistula creations by reducing juxta-anastomosis trauma and subsequent stenosis.

Understanding and Optimizing Tourniquet Use During Extremity Surgery.

Tourniquet use during extremity surgery is commonplace and a relatively safe practice. The surgical team's knowledge of the patient history, proper assessment, and indications and contraindications for and risks of tourniquet use can prevent unwanted outcomes. Exploration of these critical areas reinforces perioperative nurses' awareness and understanding of safe tourniquet use. Additionally, a review of the physiological effect of tourniquets on the skin, the body's response to local compression, the risk of vascular compromise, and the effect of the tourniquet on postoperative pain and swelling provides insight into AORN recommended practice guidelines. This article summarizes the indications and assessments for and risks of tourniquet use for patients during extremity surgery. An understanding of these topics can improve surgical outcomes and promote safe perioperative care.

Effect of pneumatic tourniquet on perioperative blood loss in total knee arthroplasty / 中国修复重建外科杂志

Objective: To evaluate the effect of pneumatic tourniquet on perioperative period of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: The perioperative period data of 116 patients over 60 years old with severe knee osteoarthritis treated with TKA between January 2018 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether pneumatic tourniquet was used during operation, the patients were divided into trial group (49 cases, pneumatic tourniquet was not used during operation) and control group (67 cases, pneumatic tourniquet was used during operation). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, lesion side, disease duration, and preoperative hemoglobin between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, actual total blood loss, overt blood loss, hidden blood loss, and percentage of hidden blood loss, knee swelling at 3 days after operation, and range of motion of knee at 2 weeks after operation were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time of the trial group was significantly longer than that of the control group ( t=14.013, P=0.000). The actual total blood loss, hidden blood loss, and percentage of hidden blood loss in the trial group were significantly lower than those in the control group ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the overt blood loss between the two groups ( t=-1.293, P=0.200). The knee swelling degree in the trial group was significantly slighter than that in the control group at 3 days after operation, and the range of motion of knee in the trial group was significantly better than that in the control group at 2 weeks after operation ( P<0.05). Conclusion: Pneumatic tourniquet can reduce the operation time of TKA significantly. However, it may increase the hidden blood loss and knee swelling, and negatively impact the recovery of knee function in the early postoperative stage of TKA.

Tourniquet pressure settings based on limb occlusion pressure determination or arterial occlusion pressure estimation in total knee arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized, double blind trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the limb occlusion pressure (LOP) determination and arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) estimation methods for tourniquet pressure setting in adult patients undergoing knee arthroplasty under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. METHODS: Ninety-three patients were randomized into two groups. Pneumatic tourniquet inflation pressures were adjusted based either on LOP determination or AOP estimation in Group 1 (46 patients, 38 female and 8 male; mean age: 67.71 ± 9.17) and Group 2 (47 patients, 40 female and 7 male; mean age: 70.31 ± 8.27), respectively. Initial and maximal systolic blood pressures, LOP/AOP levels, required time to estimate AOP/determinate LOP and set the cuff pressure, initial and maximal tourniquet pressures and tourniquet time were recorded. The effectiveness of the tourniquet was assessed by the orthopedic surgeons using a Likert scale. RESULTS: Initial and maximal systolic blood pressures, determined LOP, estimated AOP, duration of tourniquet and the performance of the tourniquet were not different between groups. However, the initial (182.44 ± 14.59 mm Hg vs. 200.69 ± 15.55 mm Hg) and maximal tourniquet pressures (186.91 ± 12.91 mm Hg vs. 200.69 ± 15.55 mm Hg) were significantly lower, the time required to estimate AOP and set the tourniquet cuff pressure was significantly less (23.91 ± 4.77 s vs. 178.81 ± 25.46 s) in Group II (p = 0.000). No complications that could be related to the tourniquet were observed during or after surgery. CONCLUSION: Tourniquet inflation pressure setting based on AOP estimation method provides a bloodless surgical field that is comparable to that of LOP determination method with lower pneumatic inflation pressure and less required time for cuff pressure adjustment in adult patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under combined spinal epidural anesthesia.

Rhabdomyolysis after the free fibular flap operation for mandibular reconstruction: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Free fibular flap is one of the most useful methods in the hard tissue reconstruction of the maxilla-mandible. Free fibular flap presents some advantages in which the reconstruction of both soft and hard tissues can be done at the same time. It also provides a safe and successful bone graft for the reconstruction, along with a low rate of complications. Despite these advantages and the rarity of a postoperative complication, particularly in oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures, a prolonged operation might exhibit some complications related with rhabdomyolysis. We experienced the rare event of rhabdomyolysis after oral cancer surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: In this article, we report the case of a patient who developed rhabdomyolysis after undergoing free fibular flap surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advantages of the free fibular flap operation, clinicians must be aware of the risk of complications because there are multiple factors that could result in rhabdomyolysis, such as duration of operation, position of the subject, and pre-existing conditions of diabetes and hypertension. Once the diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis is confirmed, a prompt treatment plan should be made and applied as soon as possible. This will increase the chance of a full recovery for the patient who is exhibiting symptoms of rhabdomyolysis.

Rhabdomyolysis after the free fibular flap operation for mandibular reconstruction: a case report / 대한악안면성형재건외과학회지

BACKGROUND: Free fibular flap is one of the most useful methods in the hard tissue reconstruction of the maxilla-mandible. Free fibular flap presents some advantages in which the reconstruction of both soft and hard tissues can be done at the same time. It also provides a safe and successful bone graft for the reconstruction, along with a low rate of complications. Despite these advantages and the rarity of a postoperative complication, particularly in oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures, a prolonged operation might exhibit some complications related with rhabdomyolysis. We experienced the rare event of rhabdomyolysis after oral cancer surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: In this article, we report the case of a patient who developed rhabdomyolysis after undergoing free fibular flap surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advantages of the free fibular flap operation, clinicians must be aware of the risk of complications because there are multiple factors that could result in rhabdomyolysis, such as duration of operation, position of the subject, and pre-existing conditions of diabetes and hypertension. Once the diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis is confirmed, a prompt treatment plan should be made and applied as soon as possible. This will increase the chance of a full recovery for the patient who is exhibiting symptoms of rhabdomyolysis.

Back to Basics: Pneumatic Tourniquet Use.

Pneumatic tourniquets are commonly used in surgeries involving the limbs to achieve a nearly bloodless surgery and an optimal operating field or when administering regional anesthesia during surgery on a limb. Complications can arise from the use of tourniquets, including nerve injuries, pain, compartment syndrome, pressure injuries, chemical burns, and tissue necrosis. More serious injuries-including deep vein thrombosis, thermal damage to tissues, severe ischemic injuries, and rhabdomyolysis-also can occur. Therefore, it is important for perioperative team members to understand how to use pneumatic tourniquets effectively and safely to provide the best possible care to patients. This article addresses the safety risks to patients when using pneumatic tourniquets and optimal safe use of these devices.

Efficacy and safety of a new elastic tourniquet cuff in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The effects of cuff shape, timing of tourniquet application, and automated systems using limb occlusion pressure (LOP) have been reported to minimize the appropriate tourniquet pressure. However, studies on the raw material of the cuff itself to reduce the complications related to the tourniquet have been very rarely reported. The purpose of this study is to report the efficacy and safety of a tourniquet system with a new elastic cuff in which pressure is set with LOP in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A total of 63 patients who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis were enrolled from July to December 2015. Thirty-one patients were allocated to the new elastic cuff group and 32 in the conventional cuff group. Bloodless surgical field, pain visual analog scale (VAS) on the thigh, thigh circumference, range of motion, incidence of deep vein thrombosis, and muscle enzyme level after surgery were checked and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Only 1 of the 31 patients in the elastic cuff group required more pressure for obtaining a bloodless surgical field, whereas 4 of the 32 patients in the conventional cuff group required more pressure to complete surgery without being disturbed by sustained bleeding. Two patients in the conventional cuff group needed treatment for blisters and bullae at the tourniquet application site. There was no difference in pain VAS score, thigh circumference, range of motion, incidence of deep vein thrombosis, and level of muscle enzyme. CONCLUSIONS: A new elastic tourniquet cuff provided a more proper bloodless surgical field with less adjustment of tourniquet pressure despite a similar level of tourniquet pressure compared to the conventional cuff and had a low incidence of skin complications on the site of tourniquet application in TKA. These benefits make it an effective and safe medical device for orthopedic surgery requiring a tourniquet, such as TKA.