Reevaluación del diagnóstico y el tratamiento de las infecciones de dispositivos de electroestimulación cardiaca mediante [18F]FDG-PET/TC / Reappraisal of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and management of cardiac implantable electronic device infections

Introducción y objetivos: El papel de la tomografía por emisión de positrones/tomografía computarizada con 18F-fluorodesoxiglucosa ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) en las infecciones de los dispositivos de electroestimulación cardiaca (DEC) requiere una evaluación más precisa. El objetivo del trabajo es determinar su rendimiento en cada región topográfica del DEC, su capacidad en la diferenciación de infecciones locales aisladas y sistémicas, la utilidad de la captación de bazo y médula ósea (MO) para diferenciar entre infecciones locales y sistémicas y su potencial utilidad en el seguimiento de las infecciones de los DEC. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico de 54 casos de infección de DEC y 54 controles durante 2014-2021. Se estudió el rendimiento diagnóstico en cada región topográfica del DEC. Se evaluó la combinación de la [18F]FDG-PET/CT con el ecocardiograma transesofágico (ETE) para diagnosticar infecciones sistémicas, el papel de la actividad en MO y bazo y su posible utilidad para guiar la duración de la antibioterapia crónica cuando no se retira el DEC. Resultados: Se incluyeron 13 (24%) infecciones locales aisladas y 41 (76%) infecciones sistémicas. En general, la [18F]FDG-PET/CT mostró un 100% de especificidad y el 85% de sensibilidad, que fue del 79% en el bolsillo, el 57% en el cable subcutáneo, el 22% en el cable endovascular y del 10% en el cable intracardiaco. En las infecciones sistémicas, la [18F]FDG-PET/CT en combinación con ETE aumentó el diagnóstico definitivo del 34 al 56% (p=0,04). Los casos con bacteriemia mostraron hipermetabolismo del bazo (p=0,05) y la MO (p=0,04). Se obtuvo una [18F]FDG-PET/CT de seguimiento de 13 pacientes sin extracción del DEC. No hubo recaídas al suspender la antibioterapia crónica en 6 casos con [18F]FDG-PET/CT negativa. Conclusiones: La sensibilidad de la [18F]FDG-PET/CT para evaluar infecciones locales es mayor que en infecciones sistémicas y aumenta en las sistémicas en combinación con ETE...(AU)

Introduction and objectives: The role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections requires better evaluation, especially in the diagnosis of systemic infections. We aimed to determine the following: a) the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in each CIED topographical region, b) the added value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT over transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in diagnosing systemic infections, c) spleen and bone marrow uptake in differentiating isolated local infections from systemic infections, and d) the potential application of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in follow-up. Methods: Retrospective single-center study including 54 cases and 54 controls from 2014 to 2021. The Primary endpoint was the diagnostic yield of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in each topographical CIED region. Secondary analyses described the performance of [18F]FDG-PET/CT compared with that of TEE in systemic infections, bone marrow and spleen uptake in systemic and isolated local infections, and the potential application of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in guiding cessation of chronic antibiotic suppression when completed device removal is not performed. Results: We analyzed 13 (24%) isolated local infections and 41 (76%) systemic infections. Overall, the specificity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT was 100% and sensitivity 85% (79% pocket, 57% subcutaneous lead, 22% endovascular lead, 10% intracardiac lead). When combined with TEE, [18F]FDG-PET/CT increased definite diagnosis o fsystemic infections from 34% to 56% (P=.04). Systemic infections with bacteremia showed higher spleen (P=.05) and bone marrow metabolism (P=.04) than local infections. Thirteen patients without complete device removal underwent a follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT, with no relapses after discontinuation of chronic antibiotic suppression in 6 cases with negative follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Conclusions: The sensitivity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for evaluating CIED infections was high in local infections but much lower in systemic infections...(AU)

Reappraisal of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and management of cardiac implantable electronic device infections.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections requires better evaluation, especially in the diagnosis of systemic infections. We aimed to determine the following: a) the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in each CIED topographical region, b) the added value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT over transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in diagnosing systemic infections, c) spleen and bone marrow uptake in differentiating isolated local infections from systemic infections, and d) the potential application of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective single-center study including 54 cases and 54 controls from 2014 to 2021. The Primary endpoint was the diagnostic yield of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in each topographical CIED region. Secondary analyses described the performance of [18F]FDG-PET/CT compared with that of TEE in systemic infections, bone marrow and spleen uptake in systemic and isolated local infections, and the potential application of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in guiding cessation of chronic antibiotic suppression when completed device removal is not performed. RESULTS: We analyzed 13 (24%) isolated local infections and 41 (76%) systemic infections. Overall, the specificity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT was 100% and sensitivity 85% (79% pocket, 57% subcutaneous lead, 22% endovascular lead, 10% intracardiac lead). When combined with TEE, [18F]FDG-PET/CT increased definite diagnosis o fsystemic infections from 34% to 56% (P=.04). Systemic infections with bacteremia showed higher spleen (P=.05) and bone marrow metabolism (P=.04) than local infections. Thirteen patients without complete device removal underwent a follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT, with no relapses after discontinuation of chronic antibiotic suppression in 6 cases with negative follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for evaluating CIED infections was high in local infections but much lower in systemic infections. However, accuracy increased when [18F]FDG-PET/CT was combined with TEE in endovascular lead bacteremic infection. Spleen and bone marrow hypermetabolism could differentiate bacteremic systemic infection from local infection. Although further prospective studies are needed, follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT could play a potential role in the management of chronic antibiotic suppression therapy when complete device removal is unachievable.

Defibrillator generator replacements in patients with left ventricular assist device support: The risks of hematoma and infection.

BACKGROUND: The majority (89%) of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients have an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in place. Due to the advances of modern-day LVAD therapy, more patients are on support for longer. This inevitably leads to more LVAD patients facing ICD generator battery depletion. Until now, there are insufficient data regarding periprocedural risks of generator replacements in a high-risk group like the LVAD cohort. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center analysis of pocket-related outcomes of all ICD generator replacements in LVAD and Non-LVAD patients between January 2014 and December 2018. The primary outcome was the combined endpoint of clinically significant pocket hematoma and/or cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection in the first 6 months after ICD generator exchange. The clinically significant hematoma was defined as hematoma requiring reoperation, prolongation of hospitalization, or interruption of anticoagulation. The cumulative incidence function was calculated for the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-seven patients underwent ICD generator exchange in our clinic in this time. Of these, 251 patients had a complete 6-month follow-up regarding clinically significant pocket hematomas and pocket infections. One hundred ninety patients had no LVAD, and 61 patients were on LVAD support. The rate of the primary combined endpoint clinically significant pocket hematoma and/or CIED infection was 3.5 times higher in LVAD patients compared to the non-LVAD cohort (event rate 39.14 vs 11.07 per 100 patient-years, p = 0.048). Clinically significant pocket hematomas necessitating revision occurred nearly 4 times more often in the LVAD group (p = 0.042). Pocket device infection rates were around 16 times higher in LVAD patients compared to non-LVAD patients (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to Non-LVAD patients, LVAD patients exhibit a relevant higher rate of clinically significant pocket hematoma and CIED infection after ICD generator exchange. This information should additionally be considered in the decision-making process regarding the indication for ICD generator exchange.

Long-term results of conservative treatment of pacemaker pocket site infections.

Introduction: The increasing frequency of cardiac device use has led to an increase in complication rates. The standard treatment for cardiac device-related infections is removal of the entire pacemaker system and reimplantation from the contralateral side after systemic antibiotherapy. The efficacy of various conservative treatments has been established for many years, but there is conflicting information in the literature regarding long-term efficacy. Aim: Our study investigated the long-term efficacy of conservative treatment in patients with pacemaker pocket site infection. Material and methods: In this retrospective study, according to the exclusion criteria, 132 patients were included. Patients were divided into conservative and standard treatment groups. Conservative treatment was considered to be opening the pacemaker pocket capsule, removing all infected and necrotic tissue, cleaning the capsule, and embedding the battery in the prepectoral region in the subpectoral muscle region. Results: The follow-up time was 36 ±12.96 months in the conservative treatment group and 39.6 ±10.8 months in the standard treatment group. During this period, no re-infection at the pacemaker pocket site was observed in either group. Examination of the swab cultures of the patients' pacemaker wounds revealed negative culture results in 15 patients (15 out of 60) in the conservative treatment group. In the standard treatment group, 60 patients (60 out of 72) were culture-negative. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.04). Conclusions: After a rigorous evaluation, conservative treatment is considered effective and safe in the long term in patients with device pocket site infection.

Rare enough ? Cardiac Device-related pocket Infection due to Mycobacterium fortuitum.

Nontuberculous mycobacteria are rare causes of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infections and may lead to device-related endocarditis, so preventing them is key. We present a case of CIED-related pocket infection due to Mycobacterium fortuitum which highlights the challenges in management of such infections.