Effectiveness of alcohol warning labels for at-risk groups and the general public: A policy-informing randomized experiment in Chile.

OBJECTIVE: The World Health Organization recommends using health-risk warnings on alcoholic beverages. This study examines the impact of separate or combined warning labels for at-risk groups and the general population on alcohol purchase decisions. METHODS: In 2022, 7758 adults who consumed alcohol or were pregnant/lactating women (54.0 % female, mean age = 40.6 years) were presented with an online store's beverage section and randomly assigned to one of six warning labels in a between-subjects experimental design: no-warning, pregnant/lactating, drinking-driving, general cancer risk, combined warnings, and assorted warnings across bottles. The main outcome, the intention to purchase an alcoholic vs. non-alcoholic beverage, was examined with adjusted risk differences using logistic regressions. RESULTS: Participants exposed to the general cancer risk warning decreased their alcoholic choices by 10.4 percentage points (pp.) (95 % CI [-0.139, -0.069], p < 0.001, OR = 0.561), while those in the pregnancy/lactation warning condition did it by 3.8 pp. (95 % CI [-0.071, -0.005], p = 0.025, OR = 0.806). The driving-drinking warning had no significant effect. Participants exposed to the combined warnings label, or the assorted warnings reduced alcohol purchase decisions by 6.1 pp. (95 % CI [-0.095, -0.028], p < 0.001, OR = 0.708) and 4.3 pp. (95 % CI [-0.076, -0.010], p = 0.011, OR = 0.782), respectively. Cancer warning outperformed other labels and was effective for subgroups such as pregnant/lactating women, young adults, and low-income individuals. CONCLUSIONS: General cancer risk warnings are more effective at reducing alcohol purchase decisions compared to warning labels for specific groups or labels using multiple warnings. In addition to warning labels, other policies should be considered for addressing well-known alcohol-related risks (e.g., drinking and driving).

Regulating light-duty vehicle emissions: an overview of US, EU, China and Brazil programs and its effect on air quality.

This paper reviews the progress and effectiveness of Programs to Control Vehicle Emissions (PCVEs), comparing the experiences in the United States (US), European Union (EU), China, and Brazil. We present a timeline comparison of updates and differences in standards for light-duty vehicle (LDV) compliance. We then review the benefits of controlling LDV emissions on air quality, derived from previous relevant studies. Emission standards have been increasingly restricted in all evaluated PCVEs. However, some technical aspects such as dynamometer test cycles, re-testing structure of environmental protection agency, homogeneity of new and in-use vehicles inspection and maintenance, on-board diagnostics requirements are more consolidated in the US. Previous studies at different scales show the success of PCVEs in reducing vehicle emissions and air pollutant concentrations in the US, EU, China, and Brazil. Despite PCVEs has been achieving relative success, vehicular emissions are still a major threat to air quality around the world, especially in developing countries or ascending economies whose fleet grows dramatically. In places where the air quality standards recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) are violated, it would be required the implementation of more stringent regulations with a well-designed, and homogeneous compliance policy over regional and national territories. This work contributes to clarifying the current challenges and successful experiences on regulating vehicular emissions worldwide. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10098-021-02238-1.

Identification and characterization of single use oxo/biodegradable plastics from Mexico City, Mexico: Is the advertised labeling useful?

The compositional characterization of single-use plastics (SUPs), often advertised as biodegradable (B) and oxo-biodegradable (OB), is an important step towards plastic pollution mitigation through the formulation of appropriate (re) use and disposal strategies. We present here the very first study to screen daily SUPs in Mexico through comprehensive characterizations of 33 randomly collected samples (B and OB) of high consumption, with or without food contact, from the markets (n = 80), bakeries (n = 5), pharmacies (n = 5) and near public transportation systems (n = 2) across 16 municipalities of Mexico City, using the polymer composition, metal contents and thermal properties. These SUPs are composed of 85% high-density polyethylene and 15% low-density polyethylene, with significant inorganic additives, and all of them show variable thermal degradation behavior. Among the twenty five different metals identified, most of the SUPs exceed the standard international norms (94/62/EC; EN 13432; 2016/1416; ASTM D6400-04) for Cu, Cr, Mo, Zn, Fe and Pb with the maximum concentrations of 1898 mg/kg, 1586 mg/kg, 95 mg/kg, 1492 mg/kg, 1900 mg/kg and 7528 mg/kg, respectively. Our findings uncovered that the collected SUPs from Mexico City did not have the suitable physicochemical characteristics and they might end up adding to the exponentially growing solid waste in the immediate future. Hence, we recommend the implementation of strict norms to certify the SUPs.