Gastric variceal obstruction improves the efficacy of endoscopic management of esophageal variceal bleeding in GOV type I.

Background and study aims Limited data exist regarding endoscopic obstruction of type I gastroesophageal (GOV I) in managing bleeding from esophageal varices. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we aimed to access the efficacy of blocking gastric varices in management of bleeding from esophageal varices in patients with GOV1. Patients and methods Cirrhotic patients experiencing bleeding from esophageal varices and having GOV I gastric varices in four centers were screened. All included patients were followed up for 180 days, or until death. Results A total of 93 cirrhotic patients with GOV I and bleeding esophageal varices were included. Among them, 58 patients underwent endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (ECI) for gastric varices in addition to treatment for esophageal varices (EV), while the remaining 35 patients received treatment for EV only. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the cumulative 180-day rebleeding rate was significantly lower in the ECI plus EV treatment group (7.9%) compared with the EV treatment group (30.7%) ( P = 0.0031). The cumulative incidence of 180-day mortality was 1.9% in the ECI plus EV treatment group and 23.9% in the EV treatment group ( P = 0.0010). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that concomitant ECI treatment was an independent protective factor against 180-day rebleeding and overall mortality. Conclusions In conclusion, obstruction of gastric varices in addition to endoscopic treatment for bleeding from esophageal varices in patients with GOV 1 proved superior to endoscopic treatment alone for esophageal variceal bleeding.

Comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with transmural use of LAMS in patients with liver cirrhosis: International multicenter study.

Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural (TM) deployment of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is considered relatively safe in non-cirrhotic patients and is cautiously offered to cirrhotic patients. Patients and methods This was a retrospective, multicenter, international matched case-control study to study the safety of EUS-guided TM deployment of LAMS in cirrhotic patients. Results Forty-three cirrhotic patients with model for end-stage liver disease score 12.5 ± 5, with 23 having ascites and 16 with varices underwent EUS-guided TM LAMS deployment, including 19 for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage, 13 gallbladder drainage, six for endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), three for EDGI, one for endoscopic ultrasound-directed transenteric ERCP, and one postsurgical collection drainage. Technical failure occurred in one LAMS for PFC drainage. Clinical failure was encountered in another PFC. Nine adverse events (AEs) occurred. The most common AE was LAMS migration (3), followed by non-bleeding mucosal erosion (2), delayed bleeding (2), sepsis (1), and anesthesia-related complication (pulseless electrical activity) (1). Most AEs were graded as mild (6), followed by severe (2), and moderate (1); the majority were managed conservatively. On univariable comparison, risk of AE was higher when using a 20 × 10 mm LAMS and the absence of through-the-LAMS plastic stent(s). Conditional logistic regression of matched case-control patients did not show any association between potential predicting factors and occurrence of AEs. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that mainly in patients with Child-Pugh scores A and B cirrhosis and despite the presence of mild-to-moderate ascites in over half of cases, the majority of AEs were mild and could be managed conservatively. Further studies are warranted to verify the safety of LAMS in cirrhotic patients.

Utility of gastroscopy in the left lateral semi-recumbent position: A blood-free coup!

Background and study aims The utility of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in the left lateral semi-recumbent position in the setting of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) with a persistent fundal pool of blood for adequate visualization and effective endotherapy has not been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of this position in such settings. Patients and methods A prospective study of patients presenting with acute UGIB with an uncleared fundal pool of blood was conducted. All underwent EGD in the left lateral decubitus and secondary left lateral semi-recumbent positions. Outcomes in secondary position in terms of adequate visualization of the fundus, identification of new or additional sources of bleeding, and effectiveness of endotherapy were studied. Results We screened 860 patients and included 44 patients (5.11%) with a persistent fundal pool of blood. Endoscopy in the primary position revealed the source of bleeding in 37 of 44 patients (84%). The source of the bleeding was not identified in seven of 44 patients (16%). Endoscopy in the secondary position showed clearance of fundal pool in all 44 patients (100%). A new source of bleeding was identified in all seven patients (100%) and an additional source could be identified in another five patients (13.6%). Endotherapy was performed in the secondary position for all 44 patients with 100% technical success and 94% clinical success. Conclusions These data show that endotherapy in the left lateral semi-recumbent position is feasible, safe, and effective. It should be done when endoscopy in the left lateral decubitus position reveals a pool of blood in the fundus and there is inadequate visualization of the fundus.

Risk stratification for secondary prophylaxis of gastric varices due to portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage is a common complication associated with portal hypertension. Current guidelines provide well-established recommendations for esophageal varices, while that of gastric varices remain scarce and lack evidential strength. The aim of the study is to identify a feasible risk stratification method based on imaging findings to evaluate patient response to cyanoacrylate injection for the treatment of gastric varices. METHODS: A prospective cohort study including patients diagnosed with gastric varices admitted for initial secondary prophylactic treatment for GV was conducted. Routine endoscopic examination and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) were performed on all subjects to evaluate extraluminal collaterals. All patients with gastric varices were treated uniformly with cyanoacrylate injection. Patients were prospectively followed for at least 12 months and any occurrence of variceal rebleed was recorded. RESULTS: 102 subjects were enrolled in the study, 66.7% had GOV Type 2, 27.5% had GOV Type 1 and 5.9% had IGV Type 1. During the 12 months follow-up, 33.3% patients experienced variceal rebleed. A risk assessment scoring system was proposed based on endoscopic and EUS findings. A Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between the merited risk score and incidence of variceal rebleed (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Presence of red wales sign, size of varix, and presence of para-gastric vein were all independent risk factors for variceal rebleed after endoscopic therapy for the treatment of gastric varices. Early identification of this subgroup, especially those with higher risk scores, necessitates a change in course of treatment, which can improve prognosis and overall patient outcome.

Portogastric fistula complicating remote gastric variceal coil embolization.

We present a case of a patient who suffered a rare complication of gastroesophageal varix coil embolization. During a follow up esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 4 years after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement and variceal coil embolization, the coil pack was endoscopically visualized to be eroding into the gastric lumen.