Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation (TIPS) in the angio-CT-a hybrid intervention with image fusion.

OBJECTIVE: For transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation, ultrasound guidance for portal vein puncture is strongly recommended. However, outside regular hours of service, a skilled sonographer might be lacking. Hybrid intervention suites combine CT imaging with conventional angiography allowing to project 3D information into the conventional 2D imaging and further CT-fluoroscopic puncture of the portal vein. The purpose of this study was to assess whether TIPS using angio-CT facilitates the procedure for a single interventional radiologist. METHODS: All TIPS procedures from 2021 and 2022 which took place outside regular working hours were included (n = 20). Ten TIPS procedures were performed with just fluoroscopy guidance and ten procedures using angio-CT. For the angio-CT TIPS, a contrast-enhanced CT was performed on the angiography table. From the CT, a 3D volume was created using virtual rendering technique (VRT). The VRT was blended with the conventional angiography image onto the live monitor and used as guidance for the TIPS needle. Fluoroscopy time, area dose product, and interventional time were assessed. RESULTS: Hybrid intervention with angio-CT did lead to a significantly shorter fluoroscopy time and interventional time (p = 0.034 for both). Mean radiation exposure was significantly reduced, too (p = 0.04). Furthermore, the mortality rate was lower in patients who underwent the hybrid TIPS (0% vs 33%). CONCLUSION: TIPS procedure in angio-CT performed by only one interventional radiologist is quicker and reduces radiation exposure for the interventionalist compared to mere fluoroscopy guidance. The results further indicate increased safety using angio-CT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using angio-CT in TIPS procedures during non-standard working hours. Results indicated that the use of angio-CT significantly reduced fluoroscopy time, interventional time, and radiation exposure, while also leading to improved patient outcomes. KEY POINTS: • Image guiding such as ultrasound is recommended for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation but might be not available for emergency cases outside of regular working hours. • Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation using an angio-CT with image fusion is feasible for only one physician under emergency settings and results in lower radiation exposure and faster procedures. • Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation using an angio-CT with image fusion seems to be safer than using mere fluoroscopy guidance.

Hepatic hydrothorax does not increase the risk of death after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhosis patients.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatic hydrothorax (HH) is a predictor of poor survival in cirrhosis patients. However, whether HH increases the mortality risk of cirrhosis patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the influence of HH on the survival of cirrhosis patients after TIPS. METHODS: Cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension complications were selected from a prospective database of consecutive patients treated with TIPS in Xijing Hospital from January 2015 to June 2021. Cirrhosis patients with HH were treated as the experimental group. A control group of cirrhosis patients without HH was created using propensity score matching. Survival after TIPS and the related risk factors were analysed. RESULTS: There were 1292 cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension complications treated with TIPS, among whom 255 patients had HH. Compared with patients without HH, patients with HH had worse liver function (MELD, 12 vs. 10, p < 0.001), but no difference in survival after TIPS was observed. After propensity score matching, 243 patients with HH and 243 patients without HH were enrolled. There was no difference in cumulative survival between patients with and without HH. Cox regression analysis showed that HH was not associated with survival after TIPS, and main portal vein thrombosis (> 50%) was a prognostic factor of long-term survival after TIPS in cirrhosis patients (hazard ratio, 1.386; 95% CI, 1.030-1.865, p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Hepatic hydrothorax does not increase the risk of death after TIPS in cirrhosis patients. KEY POINTS: • Hepatic hydrothorax is a decompensated event of cirrhosis and increases the risk of death. • Hepatic hydrothorax is associated with worse liver function. • Hepatic hydrothorax does not increase the mortality of cirrhosis treated with TIPS.

Clinical outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with PTFE-covered stents after liver transplantation and technical results in split and whole liver graft recipients.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation using PTFE-covered stents in liver transplant (LT) recipients and to analyze the technical result of TIPS creation in split grafts (SG) compared with whole liver grafts (WG). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Single-center, retrospective study, analyzing LT patients who underwent TIPS using PTFE-covered stents. Clinical and technical variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2021, TIPS was created using PTFE-covered stents in 48 LT patients at a median of 43 months (range, 0.5-192) after LT. TIPS indications were refractory ascites (RA) in 33 patients (69%), variceal bleeding (VB) in 9 patients (19%), others in 6 (12%). Ten patients (21%) received a SG. Technical success rate was 100% in both groups: in two WG recipients, (5%) a second attempt was required. An unconventional approach (combined transhepatic or transplenic access) was needed in 2 WG (5%) and 2 SG recipients (20%). Two procedure-related death occurred in the WG group. After a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 0,1-144), 16 patients (48%) in the RA group did not require post-TIPS paracentesis, in the VB group rebleeding occurred in 3 patients (33%). Fifteen patients (31%) underwent TIPS revision. Overt hepatic encephalopathy occurred in 14 patients (29%). Patient survival at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years was 77%, 66%, and 43%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility and safety of TIPS creation in SG are comparable to that of WG. TIPS creation using PTFE-covered stents represents a viable option to treat portal hypertensive complications in LT recipients. KEY POINTS: • TIPS creation using PTFE-covered stents represents a viable option to treat complications of PH in LT recipients. • TIPS creation in LT SG recipients appears to be safe and feasible as in WG. • Results from this study may help to refine the management of LT patients with recurrent portal hypertensive complications encouraging physicians to consider TIPS creation as a treatment option in both SG and WG recipients.

Value of different scoring models in predicting the survival of patients with liver cirrhosis after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt / 临床肝胆病杂志

Objective To compare the value of Child-Pugh score, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, MELD combined with serum sodium concentration (MELD-Na) score, CLIF Consortium Acute Decompensation (CLIF-C AD) score, and Freiburg index of post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) survival (FIPS) score in predicting the survival of patients undergoing TIPS. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 447 patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent TIPS in several hospitals in southwest China, among whom there were 306 patients in the survival group and 62 in the death group. The scores of the above five models were calculated, and a survival analysis was performed based on these models. The independent samples t -test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between groups, and the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between groups; the Pearson chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups; a multivariate Cox regression analysis was used for correction analysis of known influencing factors with statistical significance which were not included in the scoring models; the Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the discriminatory ability of each model in identifying risks in the surgical population, and the log-rank test was used for analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), C-index at different time points, and calibration curve were used to evaluate the predictive ability of each scoring model. Results Compared with the death group, the survival group had significantly lower age ( Z =2.884, P < 0.05), higher albumin ( t =3.577, P < 0.05), and Na + ( Z =-3.756, P < 0.05) and significantly lower proportion of patients with alcoholic cirrhosis ( χ 2 =22.674, P < 0.05), aspartate aminotransferase ( Z =2.141, P < 0.05), prothrombin time ( Z =2.486, P < 0.05), international normalized ratio ( Z =2.429, P < 0.05), total bilirubin ( Z =3.754, P < 0.05), severity of ascites ( χ 2 =14.186, P < 0.05), and scores of the five models (all P < 0.05). Survival analysis showed that all scoring models effectively stratified the prognostic risk of the patients undergoing TIPS. Comparison of the C-index of each scoring model at different time points showed that Child-Pugh score had the strongest ability in predicting postoperative survival, followed by MELD-Na score, MELD score, and CLIF-C AD score, and FIPS score had a relatively poor predictive ability; in addition, the prediction efficiency of each score gradually decreased over time. Child-Pugh score had the largest AUC of 0.832 in predicting 1-year survival rate after surgery, and MELD-Na score had the largest AUC of 0.726 in predicting 3-year survival rate after surgery, but FIPS score had a poor ability in predicting 1- and 3-year survival rates. Conclusion All five scoring models can predict the survival of patients with liver cirrhosis after TIPS and can provide effective stratification of prognostic risk for such patients. Child-Pugh score has a better ability in predicting short-term survival, while MELD-Na score has a better ability in predicting long-term survival, but FIPS score has a relatively poor predictive ability in predicting both short-term and long-term survival.

Current research status of prognostic models for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt / 临床肝胆病杂志

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a safe and effective method for the treatment of portal hypertension complications in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. At present, there are many prognostic scoring tools for risk stratification of poor prognosis after TIPS. This article briefly introduces seven prognostic scoring tools commonly used for TIPS and summarizes the clinical research evidence of each scoring tool. The literature review shows that there is currently no sufficient research evidence to determine the optimal prognostic scoring tool after TIPS. Future clinical studies should comprehensively explore the advantages and disadvantages of different scoring tools in predicting short- and long-term adverse prognostic events after TIPS and develop new prognostic scoring tools in combination with new prognostic markers.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt combined with collateral vessel embolization in treatment of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in liver cirrhosis： Research advances and controversies / 临床肝胆病杂志

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt （TIPS） has been recommended as a treatment method for cirrhotic portal hypertension in domestic and foreign guidelines， but there is still uncertainty in its therapeutic efficacy. More and more studies have shown that TIPS combined with collateral vessel embolization （TIPS+E） has certain advantages in the treatment of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in liver cirrhosis. This article reviews the major studies on TIPS+E in China and globally， summarizes related recommendations in guidelines and the current status of clinical application， and proposes the issues that need to be solved， such as indication， hemodynamic criteria， and selection of materials for embolization， and large－sample multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed for further clarification.

Association between transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and sarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis / 临床肝胆病杂志

Sarcopenia is a common complication of liver cirrhosis and is significantly associated with poor prognosis. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an important method for the treatment of portal hypertension and its complications. Based on current studies, this article analyzes the association between sarcopenia and the outcomes (hepatic encephalopathy and mortality) of patients with liver cirrhosis after TIPS and the value of improving the predictive ability of existing prognostic models for sarcopenia, as well as the improvement in sarcopenia after TIPS and its significance in the clinical management of patients with liver cirrhosis. A comprehensive analysis of existing reports show that baseline sarcopenia is associated with poor prognosis after TIPS, and it is thus recommended to evaluate nutritional status before TIPS based on radiological examination; TIPS can improve nutritional status and help to achieve reversal or improvement of sarcopenia to a certain extent, and it can also be translated into survival benefit. Therefore, for patients with sarcopenia and a relatively stable disease, TIPS can be performed as soon as possible after comprehensive evaluation.

Current status and advances in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in treatment of refractory ascites due to portal hypertension / 临床肝胆病杂志

Refractory ascites is one of the common complications of portal hypertension in decompensated liver cirrhosis and is characterized by extremely poor prognosis and high mortality rate. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is recommended by several international and national guidelines as one of the treatment methods after failure of large volume paracentesis combined protein infusion therapy. TIPS can effectively control the recurrence of ascites, but it can increase the risk of hepatic encephalopathy, and there are still controversies over whether it can prolong survival time. With a deeper understanding of TIPS, the maturity of surgical techniques, and the update of stent materials, it is urgent to reevaluate the position of TIPS in the treatment of refractory ascites due to portal hypertension. This article reviews the current status and advances in TIPS for the treatment of refractory ascites due to portal hypertension.

Comparison of endoscopic therapy and TIPS in prophylaxis and treatment of variceal bleeding in decompensated portal hypertension / 临床肝胆病杂志

Esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) is one of the main complications of decompensated portal hypertension, especially in patients with liver cirrhosis, and it often has a high mortality rate. Medication combined with endoscopy is the main prevention and treatment method for EGVB, while transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) combined with variceal embolization can also be selected for some high-risk patients, and individualized diagnosis and treatment of portal hypertension based on hepatic venous pressure gradient should become the latest consensus and the main strategy. This article mainly reviews endoscopic therapy and TIPS for the prevention and treatment of EGVB patients with decompensated portal hypertension in terms of selection of indications, incidence rate of complications, and respective advantages and disadvantages.

Clinical application of early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and related and research advances / 临床肝胆病杂志

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a procedure to establish a portosystemic shunt between the hepatic vein and the portal vein via the jugular approach, so as to reduce portal venous pressure and control acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB). The prognosis of EGVB has been improved significantly over the past few decades, and endoscopic variceal ligation combined with drug therapy is now recommended as the first-line treatment regimen for this disease. The latest research advances in the management of EGVB over the past decade have focused on the relatively new concept of "early" or "pre-emptive" TIPS, that is to say, early TIPS (within 72 hours after admission, ideally within 24 hours) is recommended for patients with EGVB who are at a relatively high risk of failure in standard treatment. This article briefly introduces the effect of early TIPS on controlling bleeding, mortality rate, and hepatic encephalopathy, the high-risk population for early TIPS, timing of intervention, cost effectiveness, the applications of early TIPS in a real-world setting, and recommendations for early TIPS in international guidelines and consensus statements.

Efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in treatment of primary biliary cholangitis with portal hypertension / 临床肝胆病杂志

Objective To investigate the long-term efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with portal hypertension. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 102 patients who received TIPS in Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School from January 2015 to August 2021, and these patients were divided into PBC group with 41 patients and viral hepatitis cirrhosis group with 81 patients. Related indicators were collected, including routine blood test results, liver and renal function, coagulation function, portal vein thrombosis, hepatic encephalopathy, and etiology of TIPS treatment shortly after admission, preoperative portal venous pressure, and stents used in surgery, and Child-Pugh score was calculated. Follow-up data were collected and analyzed, including postoperative upper gastrointestinal rebleeding, stent dysfunction, hepatic encephalopathy, and the data on survival and prognosis. The independent samples t -test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between two groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous data with skewed distribution between two groups; the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and the log-rank test was used for survival difference analysis. Results In the PBC group and the viral hepatitis cirrhosis group, the median percentage of reduction in portal venous pressure after surgery was 33.00% and 35.00%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P > 0.05). At the end of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the PBC group and the viral hepatitis cirrhosis group in stent dysfunction rate (14.63% vs 24.69%, χ 2 =1.642, P > 0.05), upper gastrointestinal rebleeding rate (17.07% vs 24.69%, χ 2 =0.917, P > 0.05), the incidence rate of overt hepatic encephalopathy (12.20% vs 7.41%, χ 2 =0.289, P > 0.05), and disease-specific death rate (14.63% vs 9.88%, χ 2 =0.229, P > 0.05). Conclusion For PBC patients with portal hypertension, TIPS can achieve the same efficacy as the treatment of portal hypertension caused by viral hepatitis cirrhosis and can also effectively reduce portal hypertension without increasing the incidence rate of complications and disease-specific death rate. Therefore, it is a safe and effective treatment method.

Arterio-Biliary Fistula as a Rare Life-Threatening Complication of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: A Case Report.

A 46-year-old male with alcoholic liver cirrhosis underwent a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for refractory ascites. On the 9th day after the procedure, he presented with melena and decreasing hemoglobin levels. Hemobilia due to fistula formation between the right intrahepatic bile duct and right hepatic artery was suspected on computed tomography. Angiography revealed a fistula of the small branches of the hepatic segmental arteries, and right intrahepatic bile duct was confirmed; embolization was successfully performed with a coil for the eighth segmental hepatic artery, a glue-lipiodol mixture for the fifth segmental hepatic artery, and gelfoam slurry for the right anterior hepatic artery. However, 2 days after embolization, the patient died owing to aggravated disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. When gastrointestinal bleeding occurs after TIPS, careful evaluation is immediately required, and hemobilia should be considered.

Anticoagulant therapy and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for pyrrolizidine alkaloid related hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome / 临床肝胆病杂志

Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HSOS) is a vascular liver disease characterized by varying degrees of liver injury and portal hypertension. HSOS in China is mostly associated with the intake of pyrrolizidine alkaloids. The step-up approach with anticoagulant therapy and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as the core treatment methods is the therapy currently recommended for this disease. Subcutaneous injection of low-molecular-weight heparin is the first choice for anticoagulant therapy, and oral warfarin can be used in combination or sequentially to enhance anticoagulation. Patients with no response to anticoagulant therapy can switch to TIPS. The Drum Tower Severity Score (DTSS) system can be used during treatment to evaluate the severity of the disease, in order to identify high-risk patients earlier and switch to TIPS in time, thereby improving the prognosis of patients.

Application status and future prospect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in liver cirrhosis / 临床肝胆病杂志

Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is the life-threating complication of cirrhotic portal hypertension, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective therapy for portal hypertension-related complications. TIPS can be used for the prevention of first-time bleeding in patients with recurrent or intractable ascites. TIPS should be performed as early as possible for patients at a high risk of acute variceal bleeding (Child-Pugh class C 7 points with active bleeding on endoscopy or hepatic venous pressure > 20 mmHg). TIPS is an effective salvage therapy for acute variceal bleeding with failure after standard treatment, and is also a second-line option for preventing variceal rebleeding.

Drug-eluting beads TACE is safe and non-inferior to conventional TACE in HCC patients with TIPS.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) and conventional TACE (cTACE) using lipiodol-based regimens in HCC patients with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with patent TIPS who underwent TACE from January 2013 to January 2019 that received either DEB-TACE (DEB-TACE group, n = 57) or cTACE (cTACE group, n = 62). The complications, liver toxicity, overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Altogether, 119 patients (50 ± 11 years, 107 men) were evaluated. The incidence of adverse events, including abdominal pain within 7 days (45.6% vs 79.0%, p < 0.001) and hepatic failure within 30 days (5.3% vs 19.4%, p = 0.027), were significantly lower in the DEB-TACE group than in the cTACE group. Compared to the cTACE group, the DEB-TACE group also showed mild liver toxicities in terms of increased total bilirubin (8.8% vs 22.6%), alanine aminotransferase (5.3% vs 21.0%), and aspartate aminotransferase (10.5% vs 29.0%) levels. The DEB-TACE group had better ORR than the cTACE group (70.2% vs 50.0%). The median OS and TTP were longer in the DEB-TACE group (11.4 vs 9.1 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.46, p < 0.001; 6.9 vs 5.2 months, HR = 1.47, p = 0.045). Multivariable analysis showed that α-fetoprotein levels, Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage, and treatment allocation were independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE is safe and effective in HCC patients with a TIPS and is potentially superior to cTACE in terms of complications, liver toxicities, OS, TTP, and ORR. KEY POINTS: • DEB-TACE is safe and effective in HCC patients after a TIPS procedure. • DEB-TACE improves overall survival, objective response rate, and liver toxicities and is non-inferior to cTACE in terms of time to progression. • DEB-TACE might be a potential new therapeutic option for HCC patients with TIPS.

Early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for acute variceal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The alleged benefit of early placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding (AVB) remains controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the therapeutic effect of early TIPS on cirrhotic patients with AVB. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for relevant literatures. Data from included studies were extracted, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: Three randomized control trials and six observational studies involving 2878 participants were included. Compared with those undergoing standard treatment, patients undergoing early TIPS had a significantly lower all-cause mortality (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.79). Furthermore, early TIPS was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of failure to control bleeding (RR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.07-0.29) and rebleeding (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.71), without increasing the risk of hepatic encephalopathy (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.92-1.38). In a stratification analysis based on Child-Pugh classification, the survival benefit was observed in Child-Pugh B patients with active bleeding (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.93) and Child-Pugh C patients (RR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.37-0.82), but not in low-risk patients (Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B without active bleeding) (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.55-1.57). CONCLUSION: Early TIPS is a feasible therapeutic option for cirrhotic patients with AVB, especially benefiting high-risk patients in terms of improved survival. Given the current low utilization rate in clinical practice, this study favors the placement of early TIPS in a wider range of patients with cirrhosis and AVB, especially high-risk patients. KEY POINTS: • Early TIPS is associated with improved survival in high-risk patients (Child-Pugh B plus active bleeding at endoscopy or Child-Pugh C 10-13) with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding. • Current utilization rate of early TIPS is low in clinical practice.

Current status of research on hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt / 临床肝胆病杂志

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common complication after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and there are still no systematic strategies for prevention and treatment at present. Based on recent studies in China and foreign countries, this article analyzes and summarizes the risk factors for HE after TIPS and the advances in treatment and prevention. It is pointed out that early diagnosis and prevention of covert HE should be emphasized in further research, and it is important to standardize the prevention strategies for HE after TIPS.

Changes in gut microbiota after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhotic patients with mild hepatic encephalopathy in different prognosis groups / 临床肝胆病杂志

ObjectiveTo investigate the changes in gut microbiota after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in cirrhotic patients with mild hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) in different prognosis groups. MethodsA total of 28 MHE cirrhotic patients who were hospitalized and underwent TIPS in Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases from July 2016 to July 2017 were enrolled. Fecal samples and related clinical data were collected on days 1-3 before surgery and at 1 month after surgery. According to the prognosis after surgery, the patients were divided into none-hepatic encephalopathy (HE) group with 8 patients, MHE group with 12 patients, and overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) group with 8 patients. Fecal samples were analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing to obtain the relative abundance of gut microbiota, and SPSS and R packages were used to analyze the biodiversity, postoperative changes, and differences in such changes of gut microbiota at the genus level between groups. The chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups; the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for comparison of continuous data between three groups; the Bonferroni method was used for multiple comparisons of multiple samples; the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for comparison before and after surgery within each group. For microbiome beta-diversity analyses, a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed based on Bray-Curtis distance matrix, and the Adonis method (PerMANOVA) was used for comparison between groups. ResultsPCoA based on Bray-Curtis distance matrix showed that only the MHE group had a significant change in beta diversity after surgery (F=2.71, P=0.049). After surgery, the non-HE group had significant increases in the abundance of the native flora Dialister, Coprococcus, Ruminococcaceae_uncultured, Flavonifractor, and Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 (Z=2.521, 2.1, 2.1, 2.1, and 1.96, all P＜0.05); the MHE group had significant reductions in the abundance of the harmful flora Granulicatella（Z=2.521,P=0.012）, Enterococcus（Z=2.51,P=0.012）, Streptococcus（Z=2.432,P=0.015）, and Rothia（Z=2.001,P=0.045） and significant increases in the abundance of Veillonella（Z=2.353,P=0.019） and Megasphaera（Z=1.955,P=0.05）; the OHE group only had a significant increase in the abundance of Veillonella after surgery (Z=2.38, P=0.017). There was a significant difference in the change in gut microbiota (postoperative abundance/preoperative abundance) between the non-HE group, the MHE group, and the OHE group ［2.00 (1.11-91.61) vs 1.21 (0.26-679) vs 0.09 (0.01-0.92), χ2=6.249, P=0.043］. ConclusionThere is a significant difference in the change in gut microbiota after TIPS between patients with different prognoses, and the increase in the abundance of native flora may have a certain influence on the remission of MHE.

Efficacy analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the treatment of esophago-gastric variceal bleeding complicated with cavernous transformation of the portal vein / 中华消化杂志

Objective:To explore the safety and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the treatment of esophago-gastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) complicated with cavernous transformation of portal vein (CTPV).Methods:From January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018, the clinical data of liver cirrhosis patients with EGVB and complicated with (CTPV group) or without (non-CTPV group) CTPV receiving TIPS at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School were retrospectively analyzed. The success rate of operation, stent patency rate, recurrent bleeding rate, incidence and survival rate of hepatic encephalopathy of CTPV group and non-CTPV group were analyzed. Independent samples t test, Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Results:A total of 37 liver cirrhosis patients with EGVB and CTPV receiving TIPS treatment were screened out, among which 10 patients (27.0%) failed the portal vein puncture during the TIPS and switched to endoscopic treatment, the success rate was 73.0%. A total of 460 liver cirrhosis patients with EGVB and non-CTPV received TIPS treatment, among which TIPS in 18 patients (3.9%) was failed, and the success rate was 96.1%. With 1∶2 ratio propensity matching, 54 patients were enrolled in non-CTPV group. In the CTPV group, after TIPS treatment, the average portal vein pressure decreased from (28.9±5.1) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) to (18.8±4.5) mmHg, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=7.122, P<0.01). The median follow-up time was 33 months(1 to 66 months). There were no significant differences between the CTPV group and the non-CTPV group in one-year of cumulative stent patency rate (75.0% vs. 86.8%), recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding rate of hepatic encephalopathy (21.0% vs. 10.0%), the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy (34.8% vs. 22.2%) and the survival rate (80.7% vs. 88.9%)(all P >0.05). Conclusion:TIPS is safe and effective in the treatment of liver cirrhosis patients with EGVB and CTPV, and does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications and long-term mortality.