Association between cup orientation and low back pain after total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative low back pain (LBP) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is classified as secondary hip-spine syndrome. The purpose of this study was to explore the correlations between cup orientation of THA and postoperative LBP in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included 364 ONFH patients who underwent bilateral THA between January 2011 and December 2020. Among them, 53 patients (14.6%) experienced postoperative LBP at the end of follow-up and were designated as pain group (PG). A control group (CG) consisting of 106 patients with similar age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) to those in the PG was selected. Postoperative LBP in the PG was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Demographic data, clinical information, and radiographic criteria were evaluated as potential predictors of LBP. RESULTS: Patients in PG (mean age, 47.3 years [range, 27 to 75 years]; 42 [79%] male) had a mean VAS score of 4.6 (range, 1 to 9) compared with 0 for the patients in CG (mean age, 47.6 years [range, 19 to 77 years]; 84 [79%] male). There were no significant differences in clinical data between the two groups (p > 0.05). Preoperative radiographic variables also showed no significant differences between the PG and CG (p > 0.05). However, the postoperative inclination, anteversion, and standing ante-inclination (AI) were significantly lower in the PG compared to the CG, whereas the sitting and standing sacral slope (SS) were significantly higher (p < 0.05). Moreover, the variations in standing AI, standing and sitting pelvic tilt (PT) were significantly lower in the PG compared to the CG, while the variations in standing and sitting SS and lumbar lordosis (LL) were significantly higher (p < 0.05). The variation in standing AI in the PG showed a significantly correlation with the variation of standing SS, standing PT, and LL (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Postoperative LBP in ONFH patients after bilateral THA is significantly associated with the intraoperative cup orientation. The variation in standing AI is correlated with the variations in standing SS, standing PT, and LL, potentially contributing to the development of postoperative LBP.

Risk Factors for Short-Term and Long-Term Low Back Pain After Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.

Introduction: Low back pain following transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) is prevalent (15-25% incidence). Modifying TELD techniques to avoid excessive disc removal has been suggested to reduce such pain. Facet injury, re-herniation, and disc space collapse might contribute. This retrospective study aimed to explore factors linked to post-TELD low back pain. Methods: A total of 351 patients with L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 intervertebral lumbar disc herniations, who underwent TELD at two spine centers, were included. Patients were followed for one year. Low back and leg pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pfirrmann grade, and disc height were measured at 3 months and 1 year. Correlation analyses examined links between postoperative low back pain VAS scores, age, sex, disc/vertebrae height ratio (D/V H ratio), Pfirrmann grade, cannula position grade, re-herniation grade, high-intensity zone (HIZ), disc calcification, surgical grade, and other factors. Significant variables were identified using partial least square tests, with variable importance in projection (VIP) values quantifying their impact on low back pain. Results: Univariate analysis indicated that surgical grade correlated with long-term postoperative low back pain (P = 0.023), while re-herniation (P = 0.008, P = 0.000), disc height (P = 0.001, P = 0.034), and sex (P = 0.025, P = 0.003) correlated with both short- and long-term postoperative low back pain. Trephine/cannula position is correlated with short-term low back pain (P = 0.036). Worsening low back pain was associated with female sex, improper trephine/cannula position, re-herniation, and post-surgical disc space collapse. Intradiscal irrigation was linked to decreased low back pain. Discussion: This study highlights factors influencing low back pain after TELD. Loss of disc height, extent of re-herniation, quality of trephine/cannula position, and sex were associated with low back pain at both 3 months and 1-year post-TELD. Proper techniques, like minimizing disc height loss and re-herniation, may help mitigate postoperative low back pain.

Risk factors of postoperative low back pain for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk factors of postoperative low back pain (LBP) following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS). METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled patients with IS that underwent PLIF between January 2011 and January 2016. Demographic, clinical, surgical and radiological characteristics were analysed to determine associations between these characteristics and LBP as measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean VAS pain score of LBP decreased significantly after surgery. The mean preoperative VAS pain score was significantly greater in patients with symptoms of ≤3 years duration compared with those with symptoms lasting >3 years. The postoperative VAS pain score was significantly lower in patients with grade 1 slippage compared with those with grade 2 slippage. There was a significant correlation between preoperative to postoperative change of VAS pain score and postoperative disc height (r = 0.99). CONCLUSION: PLIF significantly improved LBP in patients with low-grade IS, although patients still reported some postoperative LBP. The grade of slippage was a risk factor for postoperative LBP. Restoring the disc height appeared to improve LBP.

Risk Factors of Postoperative Low Back Pain for Low-Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: An At Least 2-Year Follow-Up Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study was conducted to clarify the risk factors of postoperative low back pain (LBP) for low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 239 patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion between January 2011 and January 2015 were included in this analysis. We investigated patient characteristics, surgical characteristics, and radiographic characteristics. RESULTS: The mean visual analog scale (VAS) score of LBP decreased dramatically after the operation. The mean preoperative VAS score was greater in patients with severe lumbar multifidus (LM) intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The postoperative VAS score was dramatically lower in patients with shorter symptom duration. Postoperative LBP disappeared more often in patients with shorter symptom duration. LBP VAS changing showed significant differences in different symptom duration groups and LM IMAT groups. CONCLUSIONS: LM IMAT and symptom duration were risk factors for postoperative LBP. Patients with severe LM IMAT reported more severe LBP before the operation. Postoperative LBP disappeared more often in patients with shorter symptom duration.

Risk Factors of Postoperative Low Back Pain for Lumbar Spine Disease.

PURPOSE: A retrospective study was conducted to clarify the risk factors of postoperative low back pain (LBP) for lumbar spine disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 401 patients who underwent lumbar operation between January 2011 and December 2011 were included in this analysis. We investigated patient characteristics and surgical approaches and also compared the radiographic characteristics. RESULTS: The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score decreased dramatically after the operation. The mean preoperative VAS score was greater in patients underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with longer duration of symptoms, longer operation time, and severe lumbar multifidus (LM) intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). The preoperative VAS score was dramatically lower in patients with lumbar herniation. The postoperative VAS score was dramatically lower in patients who underwent PLIF with longer operation time and mild LM IMAT. Postoperative LBP disappeared more often in patients who underwent PLIF with longer operation times. The number of operative levels and type of lumbar spine disease also were associated with postoperative LBP. CONCLUSION: Type of surgery, operation time, number of operative level, and type of disease were risk factors for the postoperative LBP. Patients underwent PLIF with shorter symptom duration, longer operation time severe LM IMAT, and lumber spondylolisthesis reported more severe LBP before the operation. Patients underwent discectomy with shorter operation times.

Comparison of Spinous Process-Splitting Laminectomy versus Conventional Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Seventy-five patients who had been treated for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) were reviewed retrospectively. PURPOSE: Invasion into the paravertebral muscle can cause major problems after laminectomy for LSS. To address these problems, we performed spinous process-splitting laminectomy. We present a comparative study of decompression of LSS using 2 approaches. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There are no other study has investigated the lumbar spinal instability after spinous process-splitting laminectomy. METHODS: This study included 75 patients who underwent laminectomy for the treatment of LSS and who were observed through follow-ups for more than 2 years. Fifty-five patients underwent spinous process-splitting laminectomy (splitting group) and 20 patients underwent conventional laminectomy (conventional group). We evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of each surgical procedure. RESULTS: Japanese Orthopaedic Association score improved significantly in both groups two years postoperatively. The following values were all significantly lower, as shown with p-values, in the splitting group compared to the conventional group: average operating time (p=0.002), postoperative C-reactive protein level (p=0.006), the mean postoperative number of days until returning to normal body temperature (p=0.047), and the mean change in angulation 2 years postoperatively (p=0.007). The adjacent segment degeneration occurred in 6 patients (10.9%) in the splitting group and 11 patients (55.0%) in the conventional group. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the spinous process-splitting laminectomy was shown to be less invasive and more stable for patients with LSS, compared to the conventional laminectomy.

Comparison of Spinous Process-Splitting Laminectomy versus Conventional Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

STUDY DESIGN: Seventy-five patients who had been treated for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) were reviewed retrospectively. PURPOSE: Invasion into the paravertebral muscle can cause major problems after laminectomy for LSS. To address these problems, we performed spinous process-splitting laminectomy. We present a comparative study of decompression of LSS using 2 approaches. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There are no other study has investigated the lumbar spinal instability after spinous process-splitting laminectomy. METHODS: This study included 75 patients who underwent laminectomy for the treatment of LSS and who were observed through follow-ups for more than 2 years. Fifty-five patients underwent spinous process-splitting laminectomy (splitting group) and 20 patients underwent conventional laminectomy (conventional group). We evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of each surgical procedure. RESULTS: Japanese Orthopaedic Association score improved significantly in both groups two years postoperatively. The following values were all significantly lower, as shown with p-values, in the splitting group compared to the conventional group: average operating time (p=0.002), postoperative C-reactive protein level (p=0.006), the mean postoperative number of days until returning to normal body temperature (p=0.047), and the mean change in angulation 2 years postoperatively (p=0.007). The adjacent segment degeneration occurred in 6 patients (10.9%) in the splitting group and 11 patients (55.0%) in the conventional group. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the spinous process-splitting laminectomy was shown to be less invasive and more stable for patients with LSS, compared to the conventional laminectomy.