The Influence of an Unexpected Symbolic Gift on Postoperative Arthroplasty Patients' Press Ganey Scores.

INTRODUCTION: Hospitals use Press Ganey surveys to evaluate patient satisfaction. The goal of our study was to evaluate whether surgeon-driven gifting to patients post-operatively affects Press Ganey Survey responses. METHODS: There were 1,468 patients undergoing arthroplasty at our institution who were randomized to receive a thank you gift, a small bouquet of flowers, and a note from their provider after surgery, or nothing for completing their pre-operative arthroplasty registry questionnaire. Press Ganey surveys were sent to patients who received and did not receive flowers immediately after their hospital stay and after the patients' first post-operative visit. Scores were reported as the mean score and the fraction of responses with a top-box rating. One-sided student t-tests and Fischer Exact tests were used to assess statistical significance. RESULTS: Hospital Discharge Patients who received flowers had higher Press Ganey survey scores than patients who did not receive flowers. For example, for "Physician's concerns for questions," they had higher scores (mean difference: 3.7 ± 1.6 points, P = 0.012) and a 9% higher top-box rating (P = 0.032). For "Staff attitude towards visitors," they also had higher scores (mean difference: 2.8 ± 1.3 points, P = 0.019) and a 7% higher top-box rating (P = 0.049). First Follow-up Patients who received flowers had a higher top-box rating for "Concern provider showed for questions" and "Amount of time provider spent with you" by 6% (P = 0.046) and 11% (P = 0.009), respectively. They also had higher scores for "Information provider gave about medications" (mean difference: 4.0 ± 1.6 points, P = 0.009) and 11% higher top-box rating (P = 0.006). DISCUSSION: Press Ganey Surveys were higher in orthopaedic patients who received bouquets of flowers from their arthroplasty surgeons compared to patients who did not. At follow-up, improved Press Ganey scores persisted if the patient received flowers. The gift of flowers generates patient loyalty to their surgeon.

Comparing Satisfaction Among Providers Treating Both Pediatric and Adult Otolaryngology Patients.

Objective: Although pediatric otolaryngology providers are reported to garner lower patient satisfaction than adults, this difference is not well characterized. This study investigates whether patient satisfaction differences exist in providers who treat both pediatric and adult patients. Study Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Tertiary medical center. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, Press Ganey surveys (PGS) completed by patients or parents on their first-time visit with 5 general otolaryngology providers from July 2014 to March 2022 were analyzed. Surveys were categorized by child (<18 years old) or adult and consisted of 14 items including 6 service domains of access, visit, nursing, provider, personal issues, and assessment. Analysis was performed with Walsh's t test and analysis of variance. Multivariable logistic regression, controlling for wait times and provider, evaluated the likelihood of highest satisfaction scores (HI-SCORES) based on age. Results: A total of 2549 patients (135 pediatric, 2414 adults) completed the PGS on their initial visit. There was no significant difference in the mean overall satisfaction scores between pediatric and adult patients. Further analysis of service domains among pediatric patients found the mean score in the access domain to be higher for the 6- to 11-year-old age group (0-5 years old: 85.5 ± 20.5 [mean ± SD], 6-11 years old: 94.7 ± 11.5, 12-17 years old: 87.3 ± 15.4, P = .03). Pediatric patients did not have a significantly higher likelihood (odds ratio = 1.1, 95% confidence interval: 0.8-1.6, P > .05) of reporting HI-SCORES compared to adults after covariate adjustment. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction scores for providers who treat pediatric and adult patients utilizing the same facility and scheduling team.

Race, Ethnicity, and Other Patient and Clinical Encounter Characteristics Associated with Patient Experiences of Access to Care.

The Press Ganey (PG) Outpatient Medical Practice Survey measures patients' experiences of healthcare access in the U.S. We aimed to identify differences in experiences of access to care by patient race, ethnicity, and other sociodemographic characteristics, an important first step in informing health policy and ensuring equitable healthcare delivery. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of PG surveys for adult outpatient visits within the University of Pennsylvania Health System from 2014-2017, including 119,373 unique patients. Compared with White patients, Black (odds ratio [OR] 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.87), Asian (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.58-0.66), and other/unknown race patients (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.72-0.94) were each less likely to report the maximum score for timely access to care. Patients of all minoritized groups, as well as those whose primary language was not English, reported lower scores in secondary access measures related to communication and respect, compared to White and primarily English-speaking patients, respectively. Efforts to improve the experience of access to care among racial and ethnic minoritized patients are imperative to achieve equity in healthcare delivery.

Unmasking disparities: the challenge of diversity, equity, and inclusion in Press Ganey surveys.

Data on minority group physicians from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds is sparse and not reported by PG metrics at the national level. While PG metrics typically concentrate on the individual, patterns and trends are clearly discernible at the group level and comparison of groups to capture patterns may yield results hitherto unknown. One could even envisage using AI to capture any trends, differences, and comparative figures to build databases for the future. It is time to retool PG surveys to fit the modern U.S. healthcare workforce and be inclusive, and not selective at the individual level.

Patient Satisfaction in Dental Healthcare Settings at Saudi Ministry of Health: A Descriptive Study.

Background: Patient satisfaction is crucial for assessing healthcare quality and identifying strengths and weaknesses in healthcare organizations. In Saudi Arabia, the Ministry of Health (MOH) implemented the Patient Experience Measurement Program to enhance patient experience and healthcare quality. This study aimed to identify specific aspects of patient satisfaction with dental visits in Saudi Arabia to improve dental care quality and inform dental services development. Methods: The study used a standardized self-administered questionnaire (Health Links/Press Ganey) and analyzed surveys from patients who visited MOH-specialized dental clinics in Saudi Arabia during the first half of 2022. The dental section comprised 20 questions across five domains, with patients rating their experience on a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25. Results: A total of 964 patients were surveyed. The overall patient satisfaction with dental settings was 3.61 out of 5.0 (72.2%). The highest satisfaction score was for personal issues with the dental clinic domain (3.93/5; 78.6%), while the least satisfaction score was for access to the dental clinic domain (3.29/5; 65.8%). Among all items, the cleanliness of the facility showed the highest satisfaction score (4.11/5; 82.2%). The least satisfaction was for the ease of contacting the dental clinic (2.71/5; 54.2%). Conclusion: The study found high levels of satisfaction among Saudi patients with dental services provided through MOH facilities across various component domains. This highlights the crucial role of dentists in ensuring high-quality dental care and serves as an indication of the overall healthcare quality in MOH facilities.

Racial Differences in Patient Satisfaction With the Hospital Experience Undergoing Primary Unilateral Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Press Ganey (PG) inpatient survey is widely used to track patient satisfaction with the hospital experience. Our aim was to use the PG survey to determine if there are racial differences in overall hospital experience and perception of nurses and surgeons following hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed Black and White patients from hip and knee arthroplasty registries from a single institution between July 2010 and February 2012. The overall assessment score for the hospital experience and perception of the nurse and surgeon questions from the PG inpatient survey were dichotomized as "not completely satisfied" or "completely satisfied". Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to determine the impact of race on the likelihood of being 'completely satisfied' in the hip and knee cohorts. Results: There were 2517 hip and 2114 knee patients who underwent surgery and completed the PG survey, of whom 3.9% were Black and 96.0% were White. Black patients were less likely to be completely satisfied with their hospital experience compared to White patients in the hip (odds ratio 0.62, confidence interval 0.39-1.00, P = .049) and knee (odds ratio 0.52, confidence interval 0.33-0.82, P = .005) cohorts. Black patients were also less likely to be completely satisfied with multiple aspects of care they received from the nurse and surgeon in both cohorts. Conclusions: We found that the PG Survey shows Black patients were less likely to be completely satisfied than White patients with the hospital experience, including their interactions with nurses and surgeons. More work is needed to understand this difference.

Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Clinic Encounters: Analysis of Factors that Impact the Press Ganey Survey in the Hand Surgery Population.

Purpose: Our purpose was to identify patient characteristics and visit components that affect patient satisfaction with virtual new patient visits in an outpatient hand surgery clinic as measured by the Press Ganey Outpatient Medical Practice Survey (PGOMPS) total score (primary outcome) and provider subscore (secondary outcome). Methods: Adult patients evaluated through virtual new patient visits at a tertiary academic medical center between January 2020 and October 2020 who completed the PGOMPS for virtual visits were included. Data regarding demographics and visit characteristics were collected via chart review. Factors associated with satisfaction were identified using a Tobit regression model on the continuous score outcomes (Total Score and Provider Subscore) to account for substantial ceiling effects. Results: A total of 95 patients were included: 54% were men and the mean age was 54 ± 16 years. Mean area deprivation index was 32 ± 18, and the mean driving distance to the clinic was 97 ± 188 mi. Common diagnoses include compressive neuropathy (21%), hand arthritis (19%), hand mass (12%), and fracture/dislocation (11%). Treatment recommendations included small joint injection (20%), in-person evaluation (25%), surgery (36%), and splinting (20%). Multivariable Tobit regressions showed notable differences in satisfaction by the provider on the Total Score but not on the Provider Subscore. Other factors known to affect the PGOMPS scores for in-person visits were not notably associated with the Total or Provider Sub-Scores for virtual visits (area deprivation index, age, and offer of surgery or injection) other than the body mass index. Conclusions: Virtual clinic visit satisfaction was affected by the provider. Wait time strongly affects satisfaction with in-person visits but is not accounted for by the PGOMPS scoring system for virtual visits, which is a limitation of their survey. Further work is required to determine how to improve the patient experience with virtual visits. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic IV.

Women physicians receive lower Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores in a multicenter study of outpatient gynecology care.

BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggest that patient satisfaction data are subject to inherent biases that negatively affect women physicians. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the association between the Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey and physician gender in a multi-institutional study of outpatient gynecologic care. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multisite, observational, population-based survey study using the results of Press Ganey patient satisfaction surveys from 5 unrelated community-based and academic medical institutions with outpatient gynecology visits between January 2020 and April 2022. The primary outcome variable was the likelihood to recommend a physician, and individual survey responses served as the unit of analysis. Patient demographic data were collected through the survey, including self-reported age, gender, and race and ethnicity (categorized as White, Asian, or Underrepresented in Medicine, which groups together Black, Hispanic or LatinX, American Indian or Alaskan Native, and Hawaiian or Pacific Islander). Bivariate comparisons between demographics (physician gender, patient and physician age quartile, patient and physician race) and likelihood to recommend were assessed using generalized estimating equation models clustered by physician. Odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P values for these analyses are reported, and results were considered statistically significant at P<.05. Analysis was performed using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). RESULTS: Data were obtained from 15,184 surveys for 130 physicians. Most physicians were women (n=95 [73%]) and White (n=98 [75%]), and patients were also predominantly White (n=10,495 [69%]). A little over half of all visits were race-concordant, meaning that both patient and physician reported the same race (57%). Women physicians were less likely to receive a topbox survey score (74% vs 77%) and in the multivariate model had 19% lower odds of receiving a topbox score (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.95). Patient age had a statistically significant relationship with score, with patients aged ≥63 years having >3-fold increase in odds of providing a topbox score (odds ratio, 3.10; 95% confidence interval, 2.12-4.52) compared with the youngest patients. After adjustment, patient and physician race and ethnicity showed similar effects on the odds of a topbox likelihood-to-recommend score, with Asian physicians and Asian patients having lower odds of a topbox likelihood-to-recommend score when compared with White physicians and patients (odds ratio: 0.89 [95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.98] and 0.62 [95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.79], respectively). Underrepresented in medicine physicians and patients showed significantly increased odds of a topbox likelihood-to-recommend score (odds ratio: 1.27 [95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.33] and 1.03 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.06], respectively). The physician age quartile was not significantly associated with odds of a topbox likelihood-to-recommend score. CONCLUSION: Women gynecologists were 18% less likely to receive top patient satisfaction scores compared with men in this multisite, population-based survey study using the results of Press Ganey patient satisfaction surveys. The results of these questionnaires should be adjusted for bias given that they provide data currently being used to understand patient-centered care.

Telemedicine Adoption in an NCI-Designated Cancer Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Report on Patient Experience of Care.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer require timely access to care so that healthcare providers can prepare an optimal treatment plan with significant implications for quality of life and mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic spurred rapid adoption of telemedicine in oncology, but study of patient experience of care with telemedicine in this population has been limited. We assessed overall patient experience of care with telemedicine at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center during the COVID-19 pandemic and examined changes in patient experience over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of outpatient oncology patients who received treatment at Moffitt Cancer Center. Press Ganey surveys were used to assess patient experience. Data from patients with appointments between April 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, were analyzed. Patient experience was compared between telemedicine and in-person visits, and patient experience with telemedicine over time was described. RESULTS: A total of 33,318 patients reported Press Ganey data for in-person visits, and 5,950 reported Press Ganey data for telemedicine visits. Relative to patients with in-person visits, more patients with telemedicine visits gave higher satisfaction ratings for access (62.5% vs 75.8%, respectively) and care provider concern (84.2% vs 90.7%, respectively) (P<.001). When adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, sex, insurance, and clinic type, telemedicine visits consistently outperformed in-person visits over time regarding access and care provider concern (P<.001). There were no significant changes over time in satisfaction with telemedicine visits regarding access, care provider concern, telemedicine technology, or overall assessment (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a large oncology dataset showed that telemedicine resulted in better patient experience of care in terms of access and care provider concern compared with in-person visits. Patient experience of care with telemedicine visits did not change over time, suggesting that implementing telemedicine was effective.

Patient Satisfaction as a Determinant of Patient Loyalty to the Dentist in Dental Clinics.

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of patient satisfaction with a dentist on their loyalty to that dentist in Saudi Ministry of Health dental clinics. Retrospective data were recruited from the patient experience program (Press Ganey Survey) during the first half of 2022. Descriptive statistical analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and multiple linear regression models were used to assess the impact on loyalty to that dentist. Among the 964 respondents who submitted their responses to the survey, the highest mean satisfaction score was for the item concerning the good listening of the dentist to the patient (3.86 of 5; 77.2%). There was a highly significant correlation between each item related to the dentist and the likelihood of the patient to recommend a certain dentist to others "that is, patient loyalty" (P < .001). The highest predictor of patient loyalty to his dentist was the dentist's explanation of the treatment options to his patient (t: 8.632, P < .001). Dentists have a crucial role to play in boosting patient satisfaction and thereby patient loyalty.

Patient Experience with Virtual Preoperative Consultations in Pediatric Surgical Specialties.

BACKGROUND: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the comparative effectiveness of virtual visits for preoperative evaluation and surgical decision-making in three pediatric surgical subspecialties. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical procedures in the departments of Urology, Ophthalmology, and Plastic and Oral Surgery at a tertiary care pediatric hospital over a one-year period during the COVID-19 pandemic were included. Patients were assigned to one of three clinical pathways based on their preoperative visit(s): only in-person visit(s) (IP), a combination of in-person and virtual visit(s) (IP/VV), and only virtual visit(s) (VV). Demographics, procedure information, and patient experience survey results were collected. We then assessed variations in procedure types and patient experience scores in these three patient groups. RESULTS: There were 431 patients who completed the modified patient experience survey. The most common procedures were circumcision (17%), excision of lesion (16%), and strabismus repair (11%). Survey results were positive, with 90% of participants rating that they would recommend the service to others. No significant differences were found among groups in their demographics, overall care rating, and duration between preoperative clinic visit and procedure. Post-hoc power analysis indicated 87% power to detect a 10% difference in survey ratings between IP and VV cases, confirming non-inferiority in patient satisfaction for virtual preoperative visits. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the non-inferiority of preoperative virtual visits in three pediatric surgical subspecialties as measured by patient experience scores. Additional studies with more granular scope are necessary to further elucidate telemedicine's safety and efficacy for select diagnoses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The Effect of Social Deprivation on Patient Satisfaction in Otolaryngology Clinics.

OBJECTIVES: Multiple factors have been associated with lower satisfaction scores. We hypothesize that patients with a more deprived socioeconomic status will have different patient satisfaction scores than patients of higher socioeconomic status. METHODS: We reviewed Press Ganey satisfaction scores for new, outpatient visits between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. Due to the high ceiling effects of the survey, "satisfaction" was defined as achieving a perfect score of 100. We determined social deprivation using the 2015 Area Deprivation Index (ADI) which serves as a proxy for socioeconomic status derived from zip codes. Patient satisfaction was defined as a binary variable. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors correlated with patient satisfaction. RESULTS: There were 3239 unique new patients with completed surveys. Univariate analysis demonstrated decreased odds of achieving satisfaction for both the Total Score and Provider Sub-Score for each decile increase in ADI (OR 0.94; CI = 0.908-0.981; P = .003 and OR 0.94; CI = 0.91-0.98; P = .002 respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed the odds for reporting satisfaction for each decile increase in ADI were 0.96 for Total Score (CI = 0.921-0.998; P = .038) and 0.96 for Provider Sub-Score (CI = 0.92-0.993; P = .019). Patients in the most deprived quartile, compared to the least deprived, were significantly less likely to be satisfied with their care for both Total Score (OR 0.70; CI = 0.564-0.865; P = .001) and Provider Sub-Score (OR 0.69; CI = 0.558-0.852; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased social deprivation was an independent predictor of lower patient satisfaction in otolaryngology outpatients using the Press Ganey survey. This non-modifiable outcome should be taken into consideration when evaluating patient satisfaction scores and offers further support to the need of addressing and improving healthcare discrepancies in the field of otolaryngology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Evaluating Factors That Influence Patient Satisfaction in Otolaryngology Clinics.

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that influence patient satisfaction during outpatient visits in various settings of otolaryngology clinics in an academic medical center. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Academic medical center. METHODS: We reviewed Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey responses for new, outpatient visits between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018. Self-reported race was identified using electronic medical records. Multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify continuous and categorical variables associated with patient satisfaction. RESULTS: There were 3998 unique new patient visits with completed surveys. Multivariate analysis revealed that responses for patients <18 years old are less likely to be satisfied with their care compared to patients ≥18 years old (OR 0.66; P < .001). For each 10-minute increase in wait time, patients were 43.4% less likely report satisfaction (P < .001). African American patients were also less likely to report satisfaction (OR 0.22; P = .043) while Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders were over 3 times more likely to be satisfied (OR 3.6; P = .013). Additionally, Medicare patients and those who were seen at community satellite clinics compared to the main University Hospital had increased odds of achieving satisfactory care (OR 1.3; P = .005 and OR 1.3; P = .002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Wait time, clinic location, patient race, insurance provider, and age were all shown to significantly influence patient-reported satisfaction. Understanding how these variables influence patient satisfaction will hopefully lead to processes that improve patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Patient satisfaction and cost savings analysis of the telemedicine program within a neuro-oncology department.

PURPOSE: Unique challenges exist in the utilization of telemedicine for neurological and surgical specialties. We examined the differences in patient satisfaction for telemedicine versus in-person visits within a Neuro-Oncology Program to assess whether there was a difference between surgical and medical specialties. We also examined the potential cost savings benefits of utilizing telemedicine. METHODS: 1189 Press Ganey surveys in the Department of Neuro-Oncology (982 in-person and 207 telemedicine) by surgical and medical neuro-oncology patients between 04/01/2020 and 06/30/2021 were reviewed. Survey results were divided into 4 categories (Access, Provider, Technology (telemedicine only), and Overall Satisfaction). Results were analyzed for the impact of telemedicine versus in-person visits, and gender, age, insurance, and specialty. Cost savings were calculated based on potential travel distance and lost productivity. RESULTS: Survey results from telemedicine visits demonstrated that patients with private insurance returned higher scores in the Provider (p = 0.0089), Technology (p = 0.00187), and Overall (p = 0.00382) categories. Surgical patients returned higher scores for Access (p = 0.0015), Technology (p = 0.0002), and Overall (p = 0.0019). When comparing telemedicine to in-person scores, in-person scored higher in Provider (p = 0.0092) for all patients, while in-person scored higher in Access (p = 0.0252) amongst surgical patients. Cost analysis revealed that telemedicine allowed patients to save an average of 4.1 to 5.6 h per visit time and a potential cost savings of up to $223.3 ± 171.4. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine yields equivalent patient satisfaction when employed in surgical as compared to medical Neuro-Oncology patients with the potential to lessen the financial and time burden on neuro-oncology patients.

The Inpatient Experience of Emerging Adults: Transitioning From Pediatric to Adult Care.

The pediatric-to-adult care transition has been correlated with worse outcomes, including increased mortality. Emerging adults transitioning from child-specific healthcare facilities to adult hospitals encounter marked differences in environment, culture, and processes of care. Accordingly, emerging adults may experience care differently than other hospitalized adults. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a large urban safety net hospital and compared all domains of patient experience between patients in 3 cohorts: ages 18 to 21, 22 to 25, and 26 years and older. We found that patient experience for emerging adults aged 18 to 21, and, to a lesser extent, aged 22 to 25, was significantly and substantially worse as compared to adults aged 26 and older. The domains of worsened experience were widespread and profound, with a 38-percentile difference in overall experience between emerging adults and established adults. While emerging adults experienced care worse in nearly all domains measured, the greatest differences were found in those pertinent to relationships between patients and care providers, suggesting a substantial deficit in our understanding of the preferences and values of emerging adults.

An analysis of physician reviews in relation to quality and social media presence.

Press Ganey patient engagement survey scores are used among health care facilities throughout the US to evaluate patients' perception of the quality of care provided. The relation of Press Ganey score to primary quality metrics has not been reported before; thus, we studied it in a cohort of Baylor Scott and White Health primary care physicians. Using simple linear regression, we evaluated Press Ganey scores and compared them with primary care quality metrics associated with improved patient outcomes, including cancer screening, depression screening, blood pressure, and glucose control, in addition to well-child visits. We found that overall quality had a very low linear correlation with Press Ganey survey items, and high-quality performance and increased number of practice years had an overall positive correlation with high survey ratings. We also found that social media presence or total website activity was not an important feature in predicting the top 25 quality performers within the health care system.

Factors associated with greater patient satisfaction in outpatient neurosurgical clinics: Recommendation for surgery, older age, cranial chief complaint, and public health insurance.

OBJECTIVE: Patient satisfaction has increasingly played a role in determining care quality. Surveys are used to gauge patient experience, satisfaction of care, and likelihood to recommend providers and facilities. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether clinical and demographic data predict greater patient satisfaction with providers in the outpatient neurosurgery clinic. METHODS: Press-Ganey (Press Ganey Associates, South Bend, IL) evaluations of 1521 patients were reviewed in an academic neurosurgical clinic from January 1, 2019 through February 1, 2021. We analyzed associations between Press-Ganey ratings and patient demographics, chief complaint, psychiatric comorbidities, number of orders placed, medication prescriptions, surgical recommendation, payor status, and referral source. We used univariate logistic regression to assess for associations between independent variables and Press-Ganey ratings. Multivariable logistic regression was used for associated factors. RESULTS: For the Likelihood to Recommend question, older age (p = 0.003), cranial chief complaint (p = 0.046), and recommendations for surgery (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with "good" ratings. For the rating of Care Received, older age (p = 0.002), cranial chief complaint (p = 0.05), and recommendations for surgery (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with "good" ratings. For Confidence in Care Provider question, recommendations for surgery (p = <0.001) and government insurance type (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with "good" ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with older age, cranial pathologies, a recommendation for surgery, and government health insurance were significantly associated with favorable patient satisfaction with providers in the outpatient neurosurgery clinic. Prospective studies should target patient populations who are younger, have spinal complaints, have non-surgical needs, and have commercial insurance to improve satisfaction.

The inpatient experience of emerging adults in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Emerging adults transitioning from pediatric to adult care experience worse outcomes including increased mortality. Improved patient experience (PEX) correlates with decreased inpatient mortality and better adherence to quality guidelines. We aimed to evaluate trends in the PEX of inpatients aged 14-29 years in the United States (US). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using a national, de-identified PEX survey obtained from hospitalized patients aged 14-29 years between 2017 and 2019. We described and compared survey responses across 10 domains. Composite mean scores for each health facility were converted to percentile rankings, which were then compared by age group to determine differences in percentile ranking (ΔPR). RESULTS: We evaluated the results of 174,174 PEX surveys across a national sample of 1519 US hospitals. The PEX percentile rankings for ages 18-21 were lower than ages 14-17 in almost every domain including experience with nurses (ΔPR = 43.4, p < 0.001), physicians (ΔPR = 31.1, p < 0.001), treatment (ΔPR = 12.3, p < 0.001), and overall experience (ΔPR = 26.5, p < 0.001). Similarly, 22-25-year-olds reported a worse PEX across nearly all domains when compared to 26-29-year-olds. CONCLUSION: In a national sample of PEX surveys, hospitalized emerging adults aged 18-25 reported worse PEX when compared to both older children and established adults. These lower ratings were most strongly attributed to people, processes, and relationships as opposed to differences in the hospital environment. By ages 26-29, PEX returned to levels similar to those reported by ages 14-17. These results suggest that further investigation to elucidate the unique needs of hospitalized emerging adults may be warranted.

The Emergency Department Patient Experience: In Their Own Words.

In this paper, the authors review the verbatim comments from patients' post-emergency department discharge survey results and highlight the impact that doctors and nurses have on the patient's experience. This paper also explores the benefits of delivering a positive experience on patients, clinicians, and healthcare systems. Many interventions that have worked are simple to implement and do not tend to require significant capital investment while having the potential of improving emergency department encounters for all those involved. There are always limitations, selection biases, and issues with generalizability in reviewing retrospective and subjective survey response data.

Correlation of Press Ganey Scores With Early Patient Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Background: Patient satisfaction metrics are commonly used to assess the quality of health care and affect reimbursement. The Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery (PGAS) is a satisfaction survey that has emerged as a prominent quality assessment tool; however, no data exist on whether PGAS scores correlate with early postsurgical satisfaction during the PGAS survey administration period in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Purpose: To determine if PGAS scores correlate with measures of satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 2 weeks postoperatively in ACLR patients. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent ACLR at a single institution was performed. Patients who completed the PGAS survey and PROs at 2 weeks postoperatively were included in the study. Surgical satisfaction was measured with the Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8), and PROs included 6 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System domains. Bivariate analysis between PGAS and PRO scores was conducted using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r S). Results: Of the 716 patients who received the PGAS survey after ACLR, 81 patients completed the survey, and 39 patients also completed PROs and were included in the study. Total converted (mean scaled score) and "top box" (percentages of questions with highest rating selected) PGAS scores showed no significant correlations with the SSQ-8 (r S =-0.24; P = .14). There were no significant correlations between SSQ-8 and PGAS domain scores except for a negative correlation with Facility domain top box scores (r S =-0.33; P = .04), meaning that patients with higher surgical satisfaction had lower PGAS Facility scores. Total PGAS (converted and top box scores) and PGAS domain scores showed no significant correlation with any of the other PROs. Conclusion: PGAS scores showed no significant positive correlation with surgical satisfaction, function, pain, mental health, activity, or expectations of surgery in patients 2 weeks after ACLR. This suggests little to no relationship between PGAS score and surgical satisfaction in the early recovery period after ACLR.