Pendelluft in hypoxemic patients resuming spontaneous breathing: proportional modes versus pressure support ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Internal redistribution of gas, referred to as pendelluft, is a new potential mechanism of effort-dependent lung injury. Neurally-adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) and proportional assist ventilation (PAV +) follow the patient's respiratory effort and improve synchrony compared with pressure support ventilation (PSV). Whether these modes could prevent the development of pendelluft compared with PSV is unknown. We aimed to compare pendelluft magnitude during PAV + and NAVA versus PSV in patients with resolving acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Patients received either NAVA, PAV + , or PSV in a crossover trial for 20-min using comparable assistance levels after controlled ventilation (> 72 h). We assessed pendelluft (the percentage of lost volume from the non-dependent lung region displaced to the dependent region during inspiration), drive (as the delta esophageal swing of the first 100 ms [ΔPes 100 ms]) and inspiratory effort (as the esophageal pressure-time product per minute [PTPmin]). We performed repeated measures analysis with post-hoc tests and mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Twenty patients mechanically ventilated for 9 [5-14] days were monitored. Despite matching for a similar tidal volume, respiratory drive and inspiratory effort were slightly higher with NAVA and PAV + compared with PSV (ΔPes 100 ms of -2.8 [-3.8--1.9] cm H2O, -3.6 [-3.9--2.4] cm H2O and -2.1 [-2.5--1.1] cm H2O, respectively, p < 0.001 for both comparisons; PTPmin of 155 [118-209] cm H2O s/min, 197 [145-269] cm H2O s/min, and 134 [93-169] cm H2O s/min, respectively, p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Pendelluft magnitude was higher in NAVA (12 ± 7%) and PAV + (13 ± 7%) compared with PSV (8 ± 6%), p < 0.001. Pendelluft magnitude was strongly associated with respiratory drive (ß = -2.771, p-value < 0.001) and inspiratory effort (ß = 0.026, p < 0.001), independent of the ventilatory mode. A higher magnitude of pendelluft in proportional modes compared with PSV existed after adjusting for PTPmin (ß = 2.606, p = 0.010 for NAVA, and ß = 3.360, p = 0.004 for PAV +), and only for PAV + when adjusted for respiratory drive (ß = 2.643, p = 0.009 for PAV +). CONCLUSIONS: Pendelluft magnitude is associated with respiratory drive and inspiratory effort. Proportional modes do not prevent its occurrence in resolving ARDS compared with PSV.

Mixed-integer quadratic programming approach for noninvasive estimation of respiratory effort profile during pressure support ventilation.

Information about respiratory mechanics such as resistance, elastance, and muscular pressure is important to mitigate ventilator-induced lung injury. Particularly during pressure support ventilation, the available options to quantify breathing effort and calculate respiratory system mechanics are often invasive or complex. We herein propose a robust and flexible estimation of respiratory effort better than current methods. We developed a method for non-invasively estimating breathing effort using only flow and pressure signals. Mixed-integer quadratic programming (MIQP) was employed, and the binary variables were the switching moments of the respiratory effort waveform. Mathematical constraints, based on ventilation physiology, were set for some variables to restrict feasible solutions. Simulated and patient data were used to verify our method, and the results were compared to an established estimation methodology. Our algorithm successfully estimated the respiratory effort, resistance, and elastance of the respiratory system, resulting in more robust performance and faster solver times than a previously proposed algorithm that used quadratic programming (QP) techniques. In a numerical simulation benchmark, the worst-case errors for resistance and elastance were 25% and 23% for QP versus <0.1% and <0.1% for MIQP, whose solver times were 4.7 s and 0.5 s, respectively. This approach can estimate several breathing effort profiles and identify the respiratory system's mechanical properties in invasively ventilated critically ill patients.

Effects of different fluid management on lung and kidney during pressure-controlled and pressure-support ventilation in experimental acute lung injury.

Optimal fluid management is critical during mechanical ventilation to mitigate lung damage. Under normovolemia and protective ventilation, pulmonary tensile stress during pressure-support ventilation (PSV) results in comparable lung protection to compressive stress during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in experimental acute lung injury (ALI). It is not yet known whether tensile stress can lead to comparable protection to compressive stress in ALI under a liberal fluid strategy (LF). A conservative fluid strategy (CF) was compared with LF during PSV and PCV on lungs and kidneys in an established model of ALI. Twenty-eight male Wistar rats received endotoxin intratracheally. After 24 h, they were treated with CF (minimum volume of Ringer's lactate to maintain normovolemia and mean arterial pressure ≥70 mmHg) or LF (~4 times higher than CF) combined with PSV or PCV (VT  = 6 ml/kg, PEEP = 3 cmH2 O) for 1 h. Nonventilated animals (n = 4) were used for molecular biology analyses. CF-PSV compared with LF-PSV: (1) decreased the diffuse alveolar damage score (10 [7.8-12] vs. 25 [23-31.5], p = 0.006), mainly due to edema in axial and alveolar parenchyma; (2) increased birefringence for occludin and claudin-4 in lung tissue and expression of zonula-occludens-1 and metalloproteinase-9 in lung. LF compared with CF reduced neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and interleukin-6 expression in the kidneys in PSV and PCV. In conclusion, CF compared with LF combined with PSV yielded less lung epithelial cell damage in the current model of ALI. However, LF compared with CF resulted in less kidney injury markers, regardless of the ventilatory strategy.

Use of noninvasive mechanical ventilation with pressure support guaranteed with average volume in de novo hypoxaemic respiratory failure. A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the results associated with the use of noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) using the BiPAP S/T-AVAPS ventilation strategy in subjects with mild to moderate de novohypoxaemicrespiratory failure. METHODS: This is a prospective study that includes subjects with de novohypoxaemic respiratory failure (not produced by acute exacerbations of COPD, chronic lung disease, or congestive heart failure) with mild to moderate PaO2/FiO2, who were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Santa Maria Clinic in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Subjects were divided into two groups and compared according to their PaO2/FiO2: higher than 100 and up to 200 mm Hg (moderate ARDS) or between 200 and 300 mm Hg (mild ARDS) (both groups were ventilated with the BiPAP S/T-AVAPS strategy). A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 38 subjects were analysed in this study. The total rate of intubation was 34.2% while the mortality rate was 28.9%. Significant differences were observed when comparing success versus failure in exhaled tidal volumes (P = 0.04), peak inspired pressure (P < 0.001), PaO2 (P < 0.001), SaO2 (P < 0.002), PaO2/FiO2 (P < 0.002), RR (P < 0.001), HR (P < 0.001), and inspiratory time (P = 0.029) measured at baseline and at 12-hour, 24-hour and 48-hour intervals. CONCLUSION: The BiPAP S/T-AVAPS ventilatory mode can be used in subjects with de novo hypoxaemic respiratory failure with special vigilance concerning exhaled tidal volumes and inspired pressure.

Comparison between effects of pressure support and pressure-controlled ventilation on lung and diaphragmatic damage in experimental emphysema.

BACKGROUND: In patients with emphysema, invasive mechanical ventilation settings should be adjusted to minimize hyperinflation while reducing respiratory effort and providing adequate gas exchange. We evaluated the impact of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) on pulmonary and diaphragmatic damage, as well as cardiac function, in experimental emphysema. METHODS: Emphysema was induced by intratracheal instillation of porcine pancreatic elastase in Wistar rats, once weekly for 4 weeks. Control animals received saline under the same protocol. Eight weeks after first instillation, control and emphysema rats were randomly assigned to PCV (n = 6/each) or PSV (n = 6/each) under protective tidal volume (6 ml/kg) for 4 h. Non-ventilated control and emphysema animals (n = 6/group) were used to characterize the model and for molecular biology analysis. Cardiorespiratory function, lung histology, diaphragm ultrastructure alterations, extracellular matrix organization, diaphragmatic proteolysis, and biological markers associated with pulmonary inflammation, alveolar stretch, and epithelial and endothelial cell damage were assessed. RESULTS: Emphysema animals exhibited cardiorespiratory changes that resemble human emphysema, such as increased areas of lung hyperinflation, pulmonary amphiregulin expression, and diaphragmatic injury. In emphysema animals, PSV compared to PCV yielded: no changes in gas exchange; decreased mean transpulmonary pressure (Pmean,L), ratio between inspiratory and total time (Ti/Ttot), lung hyperinflation, and amphiregulin expression in lung; increased ratio of pulmonary artery acceleration time to pulmonary artery ejection time, suggesting reduced right ventricular afterload; and increased ultrastructural damage to the diaphragm. Amphiregulin correlated with Pmean,L (r = 0.99, p < 0.0001) and hyperinflation (r = 0.70, p = 0.043), whereas Ti/Ttot correlated with hyperinflation (r = 0.81, p = 0.002) and Pmean,L (r = 0.60, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In the model of elastase-induced emphysema used herein, PSV reduced lung damage and improved cardiac function when compared to PCV, but worsened diaphragmatic injury.

Effects of different levels of pressure support on intra-individual breath-to-breath variability.

BACKGROUND: Evidence exists that during pressure support ventilation (PSV), the addition of an extrinsic (ie, ventilator-generated) breath-to-breath variability (BBV) of breathing pattern improves respiratory function. If BBV is beneficial per se, choosing the PS level that maximizes it could be considered a valid strategy for conventional PSV. In this study, we evaluated the effect of different PS levels on intrinsic BBV in acutely ill, mechanically ventilated subjects to determine whether a significant relationship exists between PS level and BBV magnitude. METHODS: Fourteen invasively mechanically ventilated subjects were prospectively studied. PS was adjusted at 20 cm H2O and sequentially reduced to 15, 10, and 5 cm H2O. Arterial blood gas analysis and pressure at 0.1 s after the onset of inspiration (P0.1) were measured at each PS level. Airway and esophageal pressure and air flow were continuously recorded. Peak inspiratory flow, tidal volume (VT), breathing frequency, and pressure-time product (PTP) were calculated on a breath-by-breath basis. The breathing pattern variability was assessed by the coefficient of variation of the time series of VT, peak inspiratory flow, and breathing frequency from ∼ 60 consecutive breath cycles at each PS level. A general linear model for repeated measures was applied, with PS as an independent factor. A significance level of .05 was considered. RESULTS: Despite a large inter-individual difference in all measured variables (P < .001), the coefficient of variation was as low as 30%, and no significant differences in the coefficient of variation of peak inspiratory flow, breathing frequency, and VT between PS levels were observed (P > .15). Additionally, a significant increase in P0.1, PTP, and breathing frequency (P < .01) and a reduction in VT (P < .001) were observed with PS reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significant increase in spontaneous activity with PS reduction, BBV was not influenced by the PS level and was as low as 30% for all evaluated parameters.

Cycling-off modes during pressure support ventilation: effects on breathing pattern, patient effort, and comfort.

PURPOSE: Expiratory asynchrony during pressure support ventilation (PSV) has been recognized as a cause of patient discomfort, increased workload, and impaired weaning process. We evaluated breathing pattern, patient comfort, and patient effort during PSV comparing 2 flow termination criteria: fixed at 5% of peak inspiratory flow vs automatic, real-time, breath-by-breath adjustment within the range of 5% to 55%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized crossover clinical trial. Sixteen awake patients, in the process of weaning, under PSV for more than 24 hours were subjected to 3 phases of PSV, each lasting 1 hour and using 1 of the 2 aforementioned termination criteria. RESULTS: Effective pressure support during automatic adjustment (AA) was 12.5±3.2 cm H2O vs 12.5±3.9 cm H2O (P=.9) with the fixed termination criterion, and external positive end-expiratory pressure was 6.2±1.8 vs 6.8±2 (P<.05). The effective termination criterion was higher during AA (31% [23-39] vs 12% [6-23]; P<.01), but without producing premature breath terminations. Pressure overshoots and alternative cycling-off were also decreased. Throughout the AA period, we observed a higher respiratory rate (24±8 breaths/min vs 19±6 breaths/min; P<.001), lower tidal volume (484 ± 88 mL vs 518±102 mL; P<.001), and shorter inspiratory times (1.0±0.3 seconds vs 1.3±0.3 seconds; P<.001). Automatic adjustment was associated with lower airway occlusion pressure after 0.1 second (P0.1) (1.8±0.9 cm H2O vs 2.4±1 cm H2O; P<.01), lower pressure-time product to trigger the ventilator, and lower subjective discomfort (visual analog scale, 3.7±1.3 vs 4.5±1.2; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with a fixed termination criterion, the use of a variable, real-time-adjusted termination criterion improved some indices of patient-ventilator synchrony, producing better breathing pattern, less discomfort, and slightly lower patient effort during PSV.

Ventilación no invasiva y rehabilitación respiratoria en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica / Noninvasive ventilation and pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary rehabilitation has been demonstrated to increase exercise capacity and reduce dyspnea. In the most disabled patients, the intensity of exercise during the training sessions is limited by ventilatory pump capacity. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) support has been used successfully in patients with exacerbation of COPD. However, its benefit in patients with stable COPD or in a pulmonary rehabilitation program is under discussion. This chapter therefore evaluated the scientific evidence regarding the beneficial effect of NIV support in the respiratory rehabilitation on exercise tolerance. Features of the NIV as to when they do it-whether during training or night-and modality were reviewed. Use of noninvasive ventilation in pulmonary rehabilitation was recommended in selected patients with severe COPD or advanced stage, and in those with suboptimal response to exercise training. The use of NIV should be preferably at night, using inspiratory pressure support, which can help achieve a better exercise tolerance, an improvement in gas exchange and a reduction in the overhead of the respiratory muscles and dyspnea (quality evidence B, moderate strength recommendation).

Se ha demostrado que la rehabilitación respiratoria en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) aumenta la capacidad de ejercicio y reduce la disnea. En la mayoría de los pacientes con discapacidad, la intensidad del ejercicio durante las sesiones de entrenamiento se ve limitada por la capacidad de la bomba ventilatoria. La ventilación no invasiva (VNI) ha sido utilizada con mucho éxito en pacientes con EPOC que presentan una exacerbación de su enfermedad. No obstante, su beneficio en pacientes con EPOC estable o en rehabilitación respiratoria está en discusión. En este capitulo se evaluó la evidencia científica que existe en cuanto al beneficio de la ventilación no invasiva (VNI) en la rehabilitación respiratoria. Se revisó la modalidad y las características de la VNI en cuanto a cuando realizarla -si durante el entrenamiento o nocturna-. Se recomendó la utilización de la ventilación no invasiva en rehabilitación respiratoria en pacientes seleccionados, con EPOC en etapa grave o avanzada, y en aquellos con respuestas subóptimas al entrenamiento. La utilización de la ventilación no invasiva debe ser preferentemente nocturna, y utilizando presión de soporte inspiratorio, la cual puede permitir alcanzar una mejor tolerancia al ejercicio, una mejoría del intercambio gaseoso y una disminución de la sobrecarga de los músculos respiratorios y la disnea. (calidad de la evidencia B, fuerza de la recomendación: moderada).

Interação paciente ventilador nas diferentes fases do ciclo ventilatório em ventilação por pressão de suporte / Patient-ventilator interaction on different phases of mechanical breath in pressure support ventilation

Introdução: O principal objetivo da ventilação mecânica é a diminuição do trabalho respiratório. Para que isto ocorra, o ciclo mecânico deveria coincidir com o tempo inspiratório neural do paciente. A assincronia paciente ventilador ocorre por fatores relacionados ao paciente e aos parâmetros ventilatórios e podem prolongar o tempo de suporte mecânico e permanência em unidades de terapia intensiva. Objetivos: Revisar a assincronia nas diferentes fases do ciclo respiratório, sua avaliação através dos gráficos e as intervenções capazes de melhorar a interação paciente ventilador em ventilação por pressão de suporte. Resultados/ Discussão: Através de busca em base de dados científicos, foram incluídos 26 artigos que abordavam o tema proposto. Os diferentes tipos de assincronia podem ser observados através de esforços ineficientes, atrasos no disparo, disparos automáticos, disparos duplos, presença de PEEP intrínseca, términos prematuro ou prolongado da inspiração e curvas diferentes do padrão usual. Conclusão: A correta identificação e ajustes conforme a demanda do paciente são pontos importantes na interação paciente ventilador e podem contribuir para a melhora do prognóstico destes pacientes.(AU)

Introduction: The main reason of mechanical ventilation is the decrease the work of breathing. To achieve it, the mechanical breath should coincide with the neural inspiratory time. Patient-ventilator asynchrony may be secondary for the facts related to the patient´s condition or ventilatory settings and may prolong support and UTI stay. Objectives: Review asynchrony in different phases of mechanical breath, the evaluation through ventilator waveforms and the proper settings to improve patient-ventilator interaction in pressure support ventilation. Results/ Discussion: Through research on scientific basis, 26 studies that match the theme were included. Asynchrony may be seen as inefficient efforts, trigger delay, auto-triggering, double triggering, presence of auto-PEEP, premature termination, delayed termination or unusual waveforms. Conclusion: Proper identification and adjustments that coincides with patient´s demand are critical points in patient ventilator interaction and may contribute to improve their prognosis.(AU)

Comparação entre ventilação mandatória intermitente e ventilação mandatória intermitente sincronizada com pressão de suporte em crianças / Comparison between intermittent mandatory ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation with pressure support in children

OBJETIVO: Comparar a ventilação mandatória intermitente (IMV) com a ventilação mandatória intermitente sincronizada com pressão de suporte (SIMV+PS) quanto à duração da ventilação mecânica, desmame e tempo de internação na unidade de terapia intensiva pediátrica (UTIP). MÉTODOS: Estudo clínico randomizado que incluiu crianças entre 28 dias e 4 anos de idade, admitidas na UTIP no período correspondente entre 10/2005 e 06/2007, que receberam ventilação mecânica (VM) por mais de 48 horas. Os pacientes foram alocados, por meio de sorteio, em dois grupos: grupo IMV (GIMV; n = 35) e grupo SIMV+PS (GSIMV; n = 35). Foram excluídas crianças traqueostomizadas e com insuficiência respiratória crônica. Dados relativos à oxigenação e ventilação foram anotados na admissão e no início do desmame. RESULTADOS: Os grupos não diferiram estatisticamente quanto à idade, sexo, indicação da VM, escore PRISM, escala de Comfort, uso de sedativos e parâmetros de ventilação e oxigenação. A mediana da duração da VM foi de 5 dias para ambos os grupos (p = 0,120). Também não houve diferença estatística quanto à duração do desmame [GIMV: 1 dia (1-6) versus GSIMV: 1 dia (1-6); p = 0,262] e tempo de internação [GIMV: 8 dias (2-22) versus GSIMV: 6 dias (3-20); p = 0,113]. CONCLUSÃO: Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre IMV e SIMV+PS quanto à duração da VM/desmame e tempo de internação nas crianças avaliadas. ClinicalTrials.govID: NCT00549809.

OBJECTIVE: To compare intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus pressure support (SIMV+PS) in terms of time on mechanical ventilation, duration of weaning and length of stay in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial that enrolled children aged 28 days to 4 years who were admitted to a PICU between October of 2005 and June of 2007 and put on mechanical ventilation (MV) for more than 48 hours. These patients were allocated to one of two groups by drawing lots: IMV group (IMVG; n = 35) and SIMV+PS group (SIMVG; n = 35). Children were excluded if they had undergone tracheotomy or had chronic respiratory diseases. Data on oxygenation and ventilation were recorded at admission and at the start of weaning. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, indication for MV, PRISM score, Comfort scale, use of sedatives or ventilation and oxygenation parameters. The median time on MV was 5 days for both groups (p = 0.120). There were also no statistical differences between the two groups for duration of weaning [IMVG: 1 day (1-6) vs. SIMVG: 1 day (1-6); p = 0.262] or length of hospital stay [IMVG: 8 days (2-22) vs. SIMVG: 6 days (3-20); p = 0.113]. CONCLUSION: Among the children studied here, there was no statistically significant difference between IMV and SIMV+PS in terms of time on MV, duration of weaning or time spent in the PICU. ClinicalTrials.govID: NCT00549809.

Comparação entre três métodos de obtenção do índice de respiração rápida e superficial em pacientes submetidos ao desmame da ventilação mecânica / Comparison among three methods to measure the rapid shallow breathing index in patients submitted to weaning from mechanical ventilation

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Esta pesquisa justifica-se na necessidade de maior conhecimento a respeito das técnicas de desmame ventilatório utilizadas em pacientes sob ventilação mecânica prolongada. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a obtenção do índice de respiração rápida e superficial (IRRS) nas modalidades PSV de 10 cmH2O e PEEP de 5 cmH2O (PSV10); CPAP de 5 cmH2O (CPAP5) e em ventilação espontânea (ESP), correlacionando com sucesso ou insucesso na retirada da ventilação mecânica (VM). MÉTODO: Estudo prospectivo incluindo 54 pacientes em VM há mais de 48 horas, submetidos ao IRRS em três modos ventilatórios: PSV10, CPAP5 e ESP nos momentos pré e pós-nebulização, utilizando tubo-T. Os pacientes foram retirados da VM quando o IRRS era < 105. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os valores do IRRS obtidos nos momentos pré e pós-nebulização. Houve diferença estatística significativa dos valores do IRRS entre CPAP5 e PSV10 (p = 0,008) e entre a modalidade ESP e PSV10 (p = 0,01) no momento pré-nebulização e dos valores do IRRS obtidos entre CPAP5 e PSV10 (p = 0,01) no momento pós-nebulização. CONCLUSÕES: Neste estudo pode-se observar que o valor do IRRS foi superestimado quando obtido na modalidade PSV10. Foi constatado também que não houve necessidade de nebulização de 30 minutos antes da extubação traqueal quando o desmame é realizado com a técnica de redução gradativa da PSV. Este estudo sugeriu que o IRRS foi capaz de prever o sucesso do desmame; entretanto, incapaz de determinar o insucesso quando seu valor fosse < 105. Recomenda-se que o IRRS seja analisado em associação com outros parâmetros preditivos de desmame.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the attainment of the rapid shallow breathing index (IRRS) in modalities PSV 10 cmH2O and PEEP 5 cmH2O (PSV10), CPAP 5 cmH2O (CPAP5) and spontaneous breathing (SB), correlating them with success on failure in the withdrawal of mechanical ventilation (MV). METHODS: Prospective study including 54 patients in MV > 48 hours, submitted to the IRRS in three ventilatory modalities: PSV10, CPAP5 and SB at the moments before and after T-tube spontaneous breathing. The patients were removed from MV when IRRS was < 105. RESULTS: There wasn't statistically significant difference between IRRS values at the moments before and after T-tube SB. There was statistically significant difference IRRS value between the modalities CPAP5 and PSV10 (p = 0.008), and between the modalities SB and PSV10 (p = 0.01) at the moment before T-Tube SB and of IRRS value, gotten between CPAP5 and PSV10 (p = 0.01) at the moment after T-tube SB. CONCLUSIONS: From this sample, it can be observed that IRRS values are overestimated when gotten in modality PSV10. It was also evidenced that there is no need of a 30 min T-tube SB before extubation, when the weaning is performed with the technique of gradual reduction of PSV. This study suggested that IRRS is able to predict weaning success; however it is not able to determine failure when it was < 105. It is recommended that IRRS must be analyzed in association with other predictive weaning parameters.

Implementação, avaliação e comparação dos protocolos de desmame com Tubo-T e Pressão Suporte associada à pressão expiratória final positiva em pacientes submetidos à ventilação mecânica por mais de 48 horas em unidade de terapia intensiva / Implementation, assessment and comparison of the T-Tube and pressure-support weaning protocols applied to the intensive care unit patients who had received mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A retirada precoce da ventilação mecânica dos pacientes das unidades de terapia intensiva (UTI) é importante para a redução da morbimortalidade, porém na prática, os desmames são realizados aleatoriamente. Face à importância desse procedimento, esse estudo avaliou a implementação de protocolos de desmame e comparou dois métodos distintos. MÉTODO: Foram incluídos no estudo 120 pacientes dependentes de ventilação mecânica por mais de 48 horas. O método de Pressão Suporte + PEEP (PSP), foi aplicado aos pacientes em dias pares, constituindo o grupo 1 (GPSP) e em dias ímpares, utilizou-se o método do Tubo-T (TT), formando o grupo 2 (GTT), RESULTADOS: A resposta dos pacientes à extubação revelou evolução semelhante nos dois grupos, porém deixou claro, pela análise estatística do teste Qui-quadrado, o benefício de se utilizar um protocolo de desmame. De todos os pacientes estudados, 109 (90,83 por cento) tiveram sucesso na extubação não sendo necessário nenhum tipo de ventilação não-invasiva dentro de 24 horas após o desmame, enquanto que apenas 11 pacientes (9,17 por cento) necessitaram de ventilação mecânica não-invasiva ou de re-intubação no mesmo período, caracterizando o insucesso do desmame. CONCLUSÕES: A implementação e a padronização de protocolos de desmame da ventilação mecânica, reduziu significativamente o índice de re-intubação na UTI, diminuindo o período de internação e o índice de morbimortalidade, porém neste estudo, não foram encontradas diferenças estatísticas significativas entre os métodos analisados.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mechanical ventilation incurs significant morbidity and mortality, weaning intensive care unit patients is highly desirable, although it is usuallyconducted in an empirical manner. Thus, this article assessed a weaning protocol implementation and compared two different methods. METHODS: It was carried out a study involving 120 patients who had received mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. These patients were randomlyassigned to undergo one of two weaning techniques: pressure-supportventilation + PEEP (PSP) technique, which was applied to the patients in equal days, forming the PSP group (PSPG) and the T-tube method (TT), applied in odd days and forming the TT group (TTG). Standardized protocols were followedfor each technique RESULTS: The patients response to extubation revealed similar progress in both PSP and TT groups, but after the Chi-square statistical test, the benefits of using a weaning protocol was clear. One hundred nine (90.83 percent) of all patients, had a successful weaning and any noninvasive ventilation type was needed in a span time of 24 hours after extubation, and only eleven (9.17 percent), had an unsuccessful weaning. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study didn't show any difference between the two methods applied, we could conclude that, the implementation of standardized weaning protocols can substantially decrease the patient's reintubation rate, promoting a downward trend in mortality and morbidity for these patients and shortening their hospital and intensive care units length of stay.