Lung ultrasound score evaluation of the effect of pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed on patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy (LARG) is the standard treatment for early-stage gastric carcinoma (GC). However, the negative impact of this procedure on respiratory function requires the optimized intraoperative management of patients in terms of ventilation. AIM: To investigate the influence of pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed (PCV-VG) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) on blood gas analysis and pulmonary ventilation in patients undergoing LARG for GC based on the lung ultrasound score (LUS). METHODS: The study included 103 patients with GC undergoing LARG from May 2020 to May 2023, with 52 cases undergoing PCV-VG (research group) and 51 cases undergoing VCV (control group). LUS were recorded at the time of entering the operating room (T0), 20 minutes after anesthesia with endotracheal intubation (T1), 30 minutes after artificial pneumoperitoneum (PP) establishment (T2), and 15 minutes after endotracheal tube removal (T5). For blood gas analysis, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) were observed. Peak airway pressure (Ppeak), plateau pressure (Pplat), mean airway pressure (Pmean), and dynamic pulmonary compliance (Cdyn) were recorded at T1 and T2, 1 hour after PP establishment (T3), and at the end of the operation (T4). Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) were recorded. Pre- and postoperative serum interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Compared with those at T0, the whole, anterior, lateral, posterior, upper, lower, left, and right lung LUS of the research group were significantly reduced at T1, T2, and T5; in the control group, the LUS of the whole and partial lung regions (posterior, lower, and right lung) decreased significantly at T2, while at T5, the LUS of the whole and some regions (lateral, lower, and left lung) increased significantly. In comparison with the control group, the whole and regional LUS of the research group were reduced at T1, T2, and T5, with an increase in PaO2, decrease in PaCO2, reduction in Ppeak at T1 to T4, increase in Pmean and Cdyn, and decrease in Pplat at T4, all significant. The research group showed a significantly lower incidence of PPCs than the control group within 3 days postoperatively. Postoperative IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α significantly increased in both groups, with even higher levels in the control group. CONCLUSION: LUS can indicate intraoperative non-uniformity and postural changes in pulmonary ventilation under PCV-VG and VCV. Under the lung protective ventilation strategy, the PCV-VG mode more significantly improved intraoperative lung ventilation in patients undergoing LARG for GC and reduced lung injury-related cytokine production, thereby alleviating lung injury.

Continuous estimation of respiratory system compliance and airway resistance during pressure-controlled ventilation without end-inspiration occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Assessing mechanical properties of the respiratory system (Cst) during mechanical ventilation necessitates an end-inspiration flow of zero, which requires an end-inspiratory occlusion maneuver. This lung model study aimed to observe the effect of airflow obstruction on the accuracy of respiratory mechanical properties during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) by analyzing dynamic signals. METHODS: A Hamilton C3 ventilator was attached to a lung simulator that mimics lung mechanics in healthy, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) models. PCV and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) were applied with tidal volume (VT) values of 5.0, 7.0, and 10.0 ml/kg. Performance characteristics and respiratory mechanics were assessed and were calibrated by virtual extrapolation using expiratory time constant (RCexp). RESULTS: During PCV ventilation, drive pressure (DP) was significantly increased in the ARDS model. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) gradually declined with increasing severity of airflow obstruction, while DP, end-inspiration flow (EIF), and inspiratory cycling ratio (EIF/PIF%) increased. Similar estimated values of Crs and airway resistance (Raw) during PCV and VCV ventilation were obtained in healthy adult and mild obstructive models, and the calculated errors did not exceed 5%. An underestimation of Crs and an overestimation of Raw were observed in the severe obstruction model. CONCLUSION: Using the modified dynamic signal analysis approach, respiratory system properties (Crs and Raw) could be accurately estimated in patients with non-severe airflow obstruction in the PCV mode.

A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Impact of Implementing Volume-Targeted Compared to Pressure-Limited Ventilation in a Single-Center, Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Oman.

Background The use of volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) in neonatology has been introduced in the last decade. This study was performed to determine the impact of clinical implementation of volume-targeted conventional mechanical ventilation using the volume guarantee mode in mechanical ventilation of all neonates needing mechanical ventilation compared to pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) modes. The mortality rate, duration of mechanical ventilation, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were the primary outcomes of the study. Methodology This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level III-VI neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) within a tertiary academic hospital in Oman. All intubated neonates admitted to the NICU within two time periods, i.e., the PLV cohort: January 2011 to December 2013 (three years), and the VTV cohort: January 2017 to December 2019 (three years), were eligible for inclusion in the study. Neonates were excluded if they had multiple congenital anomalies, tracheostomy, and those with a Do Not Resuscitate status. A predetermined data set was collected retrospectively from electronic records. The PLV and VTV cohorts were compared, and SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data analysis. Results A total of 290 neonates were included (PLV: n = 138, and VTV: n = 152). The two cohorts were statistically similar in their baseline characteristics, including gestational age, birth weight, Apgar scores, indications for mechanical ventilation, age at intubation, need for surfactant therapy, and age at extubation. The VTV cohort had a significantly lower mortality rate (n (%) = 10 (6.6%) vs. 21 (15.3%), p = 0.02). An insignificant trend of lower duration of ventilation was observed in the VTV cohort (34.5 vs. 50.5 hours, p = 0.24). There was no significant difference in bronchopulmonary dysplasia (16 (21.3%) vs. 12 (17.8%), p = 0.18). VTV was associated with a significant reduction in pulmonary hemorrhage (1 (0.7%) vs. 8 (5.7%), p = 0.04), episodes of hypocapnia (2 vs. 3/patient, p = 0.04), and episodes of hypercapnia (0 vs 1/patient, p = 0.04). Conclusions The implementation of VTV in clinical practice in our level III-VI NICU was associated with significant advantages, including reduction in mortality, pulmonary hemorrhage, and episodes of hypercapnia and hypocapnia. A large prospective, randomized, and multicenter trial is recommended to confirm these findings.

Nocturnal Pressure Controlled Ventilation Improves Sleep Efficiency in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving mechanical ventilation commonly experience sleep fragmentation. The present meta-analysis compared the effects of pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) on sleep quality. METHODS: We conducted a search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published before November 2023. In this meta-analysis, individual effect sizes were standardized, and the pooled effect size was determined by using random-effects models. The primary outcome was sleep efficiency. The secondary outcomes were wakefulness, percentages of REM (rapid eye movement) sleep and stages 3 and 4 non-REM sleep, the fragmentation index, and the incidence of apneic events. RESULTS: This meta-analysis examined 4 trials that involved 67 subjects. Sleep efficiency was significantly higher in the PCV group than in the PSV group (mean difference 15.57%, 95% CI 8.54%-22.59%). Wakefulness was significantly lower in the PCV group than in the PSV group (mean difference -18.67%, 95% CI -30.29% to -7.04%). The percentage of REM sleep was significantly higher in the PCV group than in the PSV group (mean difference 2.32%, 95% CI 0.20%-4.45%). Among the subjects with a tendency to develop sleep apnea, the fragmentation index was significantly lower in those receiving PCV than PSV (mean difference -40.00%, 95% CI -51.12% to -28.88%). The incidence of apneic events was significantly lower in the PCV group than in the PSV group (risk ratio 0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PSV, PCV may improve sleep quality in patients receiving nocturnal mechanical ventilation.

Individualised flow-controlled ventilation reduces applied mechanical power and improves ventilation efficiency in a porcine intra-abdominal hypertension model.

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and effects of individualised flow-controlled ventilation (FCV), based on compliance guided pressure settings, compared to standard of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in a porcine intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) model. The primary aim of this study was to investigate oxygenation. Secondary aims were to assess respiratory and metabolic variables and lung tissue aeration. METHODS: Pigs were randomly assigned to FCV (n = 9) and PCV (n = 9). IAH was induced by insufflation of air into the abdomen to induce IAH grades ranging from 0 to 3. At each IAH grade FCV was undertaken using compliance guided pressure settings, or PCV (n = 9) was undertaken with the positive end-expiratory pressure titrated for maximum compliance and the peak pressure set to achieve a tidal volume of 7 ml/kg. Gas exchange, ventilator settings and derived formulas were recorded at two timepoints for each grade of IAH. Lung aeration was assessed by a computed tomography scan at IAH grade 3. RESULTS: All 18 pigs (median weight 54 kg [IQR 51-67]) completed the observation period of 4 h. Oxygenation was comparable at each IAH grade, but a significantly lower minute volume was required to secure normocapnia in FCV at all IAH grades (7.6 vs. 14.4, MD - 6.8 (95% CI - 8.5 to - 5.2) l/min; p < 0.001). There was also a significant reduction of applied mechanical power being most evident at IAH grade 3 (25.9 vs. 57.6, MD - 31.7 (95% CI - 39.7 to - 23.7) J/min; p < 0.001). Analysis of Hounsfield unit distribution of the computed tomography scans revealed a significant reduction in non- (5 vs. 8, MD - 3 (95% CI - 6 to 0) %; p = 0.032) and poorly-aerated lung tissue (7 vs. 15, MD - 6 (95% CI - 13 to - 3) %, p = 0.002) for FCV. Concomitantly, normally-aerated lung tissue was significantly increased (84 vs. 76, MD 8 (95% CI 2 to 15) %; p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Individualised FCV showed similar oxygenation but required a significantly lower minute volume for CO2-removal, which led to a remarkable reduction of applied mechanical power. Additionally, there was a shift from non- and poorly-aerated lung tissue to normally-aerated lung tissue in FCV compared to PCV.

Six methods to determine expiratory time constants in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective observational physiology study.

BACKGROUND: Expiratory time constant (τ) objectively assesses the speed of exhalation and can guide adjustments of the respiratory rate and the I:E ratio with the goal of achieving complete exhalation. Multiple methods of obtaining τ are available, but they have not been compared. The purpose of this study was to compare six different methods to obtain τ and to test if the exponentially decaying flow corresponds to the measured time constants. METHODS: In this prospective study, pressure, flow, and volume waveforms of 30 postoperative patients undergoing volume (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) were obtained using a data acquisition device and analyzed. τ was measured as the first 63% of the exhaled tidal volume (VT) and compared to the calculated τ as the product of expiratory resistance (RE) and respiratory system compliance (CRS), or τ derived from passive flow/volume waveforms using previously published equations as proposed by Aerts, Brunner, Guttmann, and Lourens. We tested if the duration of exponentially decaying flow during exhalation corresponded to the duration of the predicted second and third τ, based on multiples of the first measured τ. RESULTS: Mean (95% CI) measured τ was 0.59 (0.57-0.62) s and 0.60 (0.58-0.63) s for PCV and VCV (p = 0.45), respectively. Aerts method showed the shortest values of all methods for both modes: 0.57 (0.54-0.59) s for PCV and 0.58 (0.55-0.61) s for VCV. Calculated (CRS * RE) and Brunner's τ were identical with mean τ of 0.64 (0.61-0.67) s for PCV and 0.66 (0.63-069) s for VCV. Mean Guttmann's τ was 0.64 (0.61-0.68) in PCV and 0.65 (0.62-0.69) in VCV. Comparison of each τ method between PCV and VCV was not significant. Predicted time to exhale 95% of the VT (i.e., 3*τ) was 1.77 (1.70-1.84) s for PCV and 1.80 (1.73-1.88) s for VCV, which was significantly longer than measured values: 1.27 (1.22-1.32) for PCV and 1.30 (1.25-1.35) s for VCV (p < 0.0001). The first, the second and the third measured τ were progressively shorter: 0.6, 0.4 and 0.3 s, in both ventilation modes (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: All six methods to determine τ show similar values and are feasible in postoperative mechanically ventilated patients in both PCV and VCV modes.

Effects of pressure-controlled ventilation targeting end-inspiratory flow rate on pulmonary complications and inflammation levels in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the impact of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) focusing on end-inspiratory flow rate on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and inflammation levels in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position. METHODS: A total of 187 patients who underwent posterior spinal surgery were enrolled and randomly divided into 3 groups: 61 in the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) group (group V), 62 in the PCV-volume-guaranteed (VG) group (group P1), and 64 in the PCV-VG end-expiratory zero flow rate group (group P2). Indicators including tidal volume (VT), peak airway pressure (Ppeak), and dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) were recorded. The Ppeak, Cdyn, PETCO2, and oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) after intubation (T0), after prone position (T1), 60 min after prone position (T2), and after supine position at the end of surgery (T3) of the three groups were collected. RESULTS: In the within-group comparison, compared with T0, Ppeak increased at T1 - 2 in groups V and P1 (P < 0.01), whereas it decreased at T1 - 3 in group P2 (P < 0.01). Cdyn decreased at T1 - 2 and PaO2/FiO2 increased at T1 - 3 in all three groups (P < 0.01), and PaO2/FiO2 increased at T1 - 3 (P < 0.01). Compared with group V, Ppeak decreased at T0 - 3 in group P1 (P < 0.01) and at T1 - 3 in group P2 (P < 0.01), while Cdyn increased at T0 - 3 in groups P1 and P2 (P < 0.01). Compared with group P1, Ppeak was elevated at T0 (P < 0.01) and decreased at T1 - 3 (P < 0.05), and Cdyn was elevated at T0 - 3 in group P2 (P < 0.01). The total incidence of PPCs in group P2 was lower than that in group V (P < 0.01). Compared with the preoperative period, serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were increased at 24 and 72 h after surgery in group V (P < 0.01), whereas that was increased at 24 h after surgery in group P1 and group P2 (P < 0.01). Compared with group V, serum IL-6 and CRP levels were reduced at 24 h after surgery in groups P1 and P2 (P < 0.01 or < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position, PCV-VG targeting an end-inspiratory zero flow rate lowers the incidence of PPCs and inflammation levels.

Comparative study of ventilation techniques with supraglottic airway devices in cats: volume-controlled vs pressure-controlled techniques.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the effectiveness of a new supraglottic airway device (SGAD) in cats undergoing anaesthesia using two types of mechanical ventilation: volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). METHODS: A total of 13 healthy cats (five male, eight female; median age 2 years [range 1-3]) were randomly allocated to either VCV or PCV. Five tidal volumes (6, 8, 10, 12 and 14 ml/kg) and five peak inspiratory pressures (4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 cmH2O) were randomly applied with a minute ventilation of 100 ml/kg/min. Various parameters, such as blood pressure, gas leakage, end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) and work of breathing (WOB), were measured while using VCV or PCV. RESULTS: The occurrence of hypotension (mean arterial blood pressure <60 mmHg) was slightly less frequent with VCV (38 events, 65 ventilating sessions) than with PCV (40 events, 65 ventilating sessions), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.429). The number of leakages did not differ between the VCV group (3 events, 65 ventilating sessions) and the PCV group (3 events, 65 ventilating sessions) (P = 1.000). Hypercapnia was identified when using VCV (10 events, 65 ventilating sessions) less frequently than when using PCV (17 events, 65 ventilating sessions), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.194). The study found a significantly higher WOB in the PCV group compared with the VCV group (P <0.034). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The present results suggested that both VCV and PCV can be used with an SGAD during anaesthesia, with VCV preferred for prolonged mechanical ventilation due to its lower workload. Adjusting tidal volume or inspiratory pressure corrects hypercapnia.

Simulated ventilation of two patients with a single ventilator in a pandemic setting.

Simultaneous ventilation of two patients may lead to hypoventilation in one patient and hyperinflation in the other patient. In a simulation of ventilation in two patients using artificial lungs, we voluntarily directed gas flow to one patient by using three-dimensional-printed Y-adapters and stenosis adapters during volume- and pressure-controlled ventilation in the first set up. We continuously modified the model using a special one-way valve on the flow-limited side and measured it in pressure-controlled ventilation with the flow sensor of the ventilator adjusted on both sides in a second and third setup. In the first setup, volume- or pressure-controlled ventilation resulted in comparable minute volumes in both lungs, even when one side was obstructed to 3 mm. In the second setup, with a 3-mm flow limitation, we had a minute ventilation of 9.4 ± 0.3 vs. 3.5 ± 0.1 L/min. In the third setup, ventilation with a 3-mm flow limitation resulted in minute ventilation of 7.2 ± 0.2 vs. 5.70 L/min at a compliance of 30 vs. 70 mL/mbar. It is possible to override the safety features of a modern intensive care ventilator and thus direct tidal volumes in different lung conditions to one lung using three-dimensional-printed flow limiters. While this ventilation setting was technically feasible in a bench model, it would be unstable, if not dangerous, in a clinical situation.

Effect of Mechanical Ventilation Mode Type on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: It is unknown whether there is a difference in pulmonary outcome in different intraoperative ventilation modes for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The aim of this trial was to determine whether patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB could benefit from intraoperative optimal ventilation mode. DESIGN: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The study was conducted at a single-center tertiary-care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,364 adults undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB participated in this trial. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned randomly (1:1:1) to receive 1 of 3 ventilation modes: volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), and pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG). All arms of the study received the lung-protective ventilation strategy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) within the first 7 postoperative days. Pulmonary complications occurred in 168 of 455 patients (36.9%) in the PCV-VG group, 171 (37.6%) in the PCV group, and 182 (40.1%) in the VCV group, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the risk of overall pulmonary complications among groups (p = 0.585). There were no significant differences in the severity grade of PPCs within 7 days, postoperative ventilation duration, intensive care unit stay, postoperative hospital stay, or 30-day postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB, intraoperative ventilation mode type did not affect the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed mode improves bronchial mucus transport velocity in patients during laparoscopic surgery for gynecological oncology: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia may impair airway mucosal function. This study aimed to investigate the effect of pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG) on bronchial mucus transport velocity (BTV) in patients during laparoscopic surgery for gynecological oncology compared with volume controlled ventilation (VCV). METHODS: 66 patients undergoing elective a laparoscopic surgery for gynecological oncology. The patients were randomized into two group receiving either PCV-VG or VCV. a drop of methylene blue was placed on the surface of the airway mucosa under the bronchoscopeand, then the distance the dye movement was measured after 2, 4, and 6 min. Outcomes were assessed at T0 (5 min after endotracheal intubation and before initiation of pneumoperitoneum), T1 and T2 (1 and 2 h after stabilization of pneumoperitoneum respectively). BTV at T0, T1 and T2 was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), body temperature, end-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2), tidal volume(VT), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), mean inspiratory pressure (Pmean), respiratory rate (RR), and dynamic compliance (CDyn) at T0, T1, and T2. RESULTS: 64 patients were included in the analysis. The median [interquartile range] BTV was significantly lower in VCV group at T1 and T2 that at T0 (P < 0.05). Furthermore, BTV was slightly reduced in PCV-VG compared with VCV. BTV in PCV-VG was significantly decreased at T2 compared with BTV at T0 (P < 0.05) and slightly decreased at T1 compared with T0(P > 0.05). Compared with the PCV-VG group, BTV in VCV group significantly decreased at T2 (P < 0.05). No participants experienced respiratory complications. CONCLUSIONS: PCV-VG is more suitable for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for gynecological oncology than VCV since it can protect mucociliary clearance function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on https://www.chictr.org.cn/ in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR.2200064564: Date of registration 11/10/2022).

Evaluation of the Effect of Pressure-Controlled Ventilation-Volume Guaranteed Mode vs. Volume-Controlled Ventilation Mode on Atelectasis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic surgery, which results in less bleeding, less postoperative pain, and better cosmetic results, may affect the lung dynamics via the pneumoperitoneum. After laparoscopic surgery, atelectasis develops. The primary aim of the present study is to demonstrate the effects of two different ventilation modes on the development of atelectasis using lung ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes include the plateau pressure, peak inspiratory pressure, and compliance differences between the groups. Materials and Methods: In this study, 62 participants aged 18-75 years undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups: the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) group (group V) or the pressure-controlled-volume guaranteed ventilation (PCV-VG) group (group PV). The lung ultrasound score (LUS) was obtained thrice: prior to induction (T1), upon the patient's initial arrival in the recovery room (T2), and just before departing the recovery unit (T3). The hemodynamic data and mechanical ventilation parameters were recorded at different times intraoperatively. Results: The LUS score was similar between the groups at all the times. The change in the LUS score of the right lower anterior chest was statistically higher in the VCV group than the PCV group. The peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was found to be statistically higher in the V group than the PV group five minutes after induction (T5) (20.84 ± 4.32 p = 0.021). The plateau pressure was found to be higher in the V group than the PV group at all times (after induction (Tind) 17.29 ± 5.53 p = 0.004, (T5) 17.77 ± 4.89 p = 0.001, after pneumoperitoneum (TPP) 19.71 ± 4.28 p = 0.002). Compliance was found to be statistically higher in the PV group than the V group at all times ((Tind) 48.87 ± 15.37 p = 0.011, (T5) 47.94 ± 13.71 p = 0.043, (TPP) 35.65 ± 6.90 p = 0.004). Before and after the pneumoperitoneum, the compliance was determined to be lower in the V group than the PV group, respectively (40.68 ± 13.91 p = 0.043, 30.77 ± 5.73 p = 0.004). Conclusions: LUS score was similar between groups at all times. The PCV-VG mode was superior to the VCV mode in providing optimal ventilatory pressures and maintaining high dynamic compliance in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

Clinical evaluation of ventilation mode on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with respiratory failure.

BACKGROUND: At present, understanding of the most effective ventilation methods for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients experiencing acute worsening symptoms and respiratory failure remains relatively limited. This report analyzed the efficiency and side effects of various ventilation techniques used for individuals experiencing an acute COPD exacerbation. AIM: To determine whether pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) can lower peak airway pressures (PAPs) and reduce the incidence of barotrauma compared to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), without compromising clinical outcomes and oxygenation parameters. METHODS: We have evaluated 600 patients who were hospitalized due to a severe COPD exacerbation, with 400 receiving mechanical ventilation for the respiratory failure. The participants were divided into two different groups, who were administered either VCV or PCV, along with appropriate management. We thereafter observed patients' attributes, clinical factors, and laboratory, radiographic, and arterial blood gas evaluations at the start and during their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). We have also employed appropriate statistical methods for the data analysis. RESULTS: Both the VCV and PCV groups experienced significant enhancements in the respiratory rate, tidal volume, and arterial blood gas values during their time in the ICU. However, no significant distinctions were detected between the groups in terms of oxygenation indices (partial pressures of oxygen/raction of inspired oxygen ratio) and partial pressures of carbon dioxide improvements. There was no considerable disparity observed between the VCV and PCV groups in the hospital mortality (32% vs 28%, P = 0.53), the number of days of ICU stay [median interquartile range (IQR): 9 (6-14) d vs 8 (5-13) d, P = 0.41], or the duration of the mechanical ventilation [median (IQR): 6 (4-10) d vs 5 (3-9) d, P = 0.47]. The PCV group displayed lower PAPs compared to the VCV group (P < 0.05) from the beginning of mechanical ventilation until extubation or ICU departure. The occurrence of barotrauma was considerably lower in the PCV group in comparison to the VCV group (6% vs 16%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Both VCV and PCV were found to be effective in treating patients with acute COPD exacerbation. However, PCV was associated with lower PAPs and a significant decrease in barotrauma, thus indicating that it might be a safer ventilation method for this group of patients. However, further large-scale study is necessary to confirm these findings and to identify the best ventilation approach for patients experiencing an acute COPD exacerbation.

A Comparison of Proximal and Tracheal Airway Pressures During Pressure Controlled Ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Airway pressure is usually measured by sensors placed in the ventilator or on the ventilator side of the endotracheal tube (ETT), at the Y-piece. These remote measurements serve as a surrogate for the tracheal or alveolar pressure. Tracheal pressure can only be predicted correctly by using a model that incorporates the pressure at the remote location, the flow through the ETT, and the resistance of the ETT if the latter is a predictable function of Y-piece flow. However, this is not consistently appropriate, and accuracy of prediction is hampered. METHODS: This in vitro study systematically examined the ventilator pressure in dependence of compliance of the respiratory system (CRS), inspiratory time, and expiratory time during pressure-controlled ventilation by using a small intratracheal pressure sensor and a mechanical lung simulator. Pressures were measured simultaneously at the ventilator outlet, at the Y-piece, and in the trachea during pressure-controlled ventilation with a peak inspiratory pressure of 20 cm H2O and a PEEP of 5 cm H2O while changing CRS (10, 30, 60, 90, and 100 mL/cm H2O) and varying inspiratory time and expiratory time. RESULTS: Tracheal pressures were always lower (maximum 8 cm H2O during inspiration) or higher (maximum 4 cm H2O during expiration) than the pressures measured proximal to the ETT if zero-flow conditions were not achieved at the end of the breathing cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Dependent on CRS and the breathing cycle, tracheal pressures deviated from those measured proximal to the ETT under non-zero-flow conditions. Intratracheal pressure and pressure curve dynamics can differ greatly from the ventilator pressure, depending on the ventilator setting and the CRS. The small pressure sensor may be used as a measurement method of tracheal pressure via integration onto an ETT.

Volume-targeted ventilation vs pressure-controlled ventilation for very low birthweight infants: a protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is essential in the management of critically ill neonates, especially preterm infants. However, inappropriate or prolonged use of invasive MV may result in ventilator-associated lung injury. A systemic review comparing pressure control ventilation (PCV) with volume-targeted ventilation mode (VTV) approved that VTV reduces the incidence of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in neonates; however, this study did not analyze subgroups of very low birthweight (VLBW) infants. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the use of VTV and PCV in VLBW infants and to provide clinical evidence for reducing mortality and complications of MV in VLBW infants. METHOD: A single-center randomized controlled trial will be performed. All eligible infants will be randomized and assigned to either VTV or PCV group with 1:1 ratio using sealed envelopes. Death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age will be used as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include BPD, death, length of invasive MV, noninvasive mechanical ventilation, and oxygen use, length of hospital stay, failure of conventional MV, rate of using high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) as rescue therapy, rate of reintubation within 48 h, and hospital expenses. DISCUSSION: Systemic review suggested that VTV decreases the incidence of death or BPD in neonates compared to PLV; however, this study did not specifically analyze subgroups of VLBW infants. We designed this single-center randomized controlled trials (RCT) to add a significant contribution regarding the benefits of VTV for VLBW patients.

Effect of target-controlled pressure-controlled ventilation on percutaneous nephrolithotripsy patients under general anesthesia: a retrospective study.

Background: Prone position surgery tends to limit chest wall mobility with decreased compliance and increased airway pressure, which can increase the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, including atelectasis, pneumonia, and respiratory failure. There is a lack of guidelines recommending mechanical ventilation parameters in prone position surgery. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) with end-inspiratory flow rate as the target on percutaneous nephrolithotripsy patients under general anesthesia in the prone position. Methods: From January 2020 to December 2021, a total of 154 patients admitted to Sichuan Provincial Rehabilitation Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM were retrospectively enrolled. All patients received percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. According to the type of mechanical ventilation given during surgery, the patients were divided into a fixed-respiration-ratio-PCV group (n=78) and a target-controlled-PCV group (n=76). The hemodynamics, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), and serum inflammation levels between the two groups were compared. Results: The overall incidence of PPCs was significantly lower in the target-controlled-PCV group than in the fixed-respiration-ratio-PCV group (3.95% vs. 14.10%, P=0.028). There were no significant differences in peak airway pressure, airway plateau pressure, or dynamic lung compliance at T0 (P>0.05). However, at T1, T2, and T3, the peak airway pressure and airway platform pressure in the target-controlled-PCV group were significantly reduced (P<0.05), and the dynamic pulmonary compliance was significantly increased (P<0.05) compared with the fixed-respiration-ratio group. There was no significant difference in preoperative interleukin 6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between the two groups (P>0.05). IL-6 and CRP levels at 1 and 3 days postoperatively were significantly reduced in the target-controlled-PCV group compared with the fixed-respiration-ratio-PCV group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Pressure-controlled ventilation with end-inspiratory flow rate as the target can reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and inflammatory levels in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotripsy under general anesthesia in the prone position.

Improved ventilation efficiency due to continuous gas flow compared to decelerating gas flow in mechanical ventilation: results of a porcine trial.

In pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), a decelerating gas flow pattern occurs during inspiration and expiration. In contrast, flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) guarantees a continuous gas flow throughout the entire ventilation cycle where the inspiration and expiration phases are simply performed by a change of gas flow direction. The aim of this trial was to highlight the effects of different flow patterns on respiratory variables and gas exchange. Anesthetized pigs were ventilated with either FCV or PCV for 1 h and thereafter for 30 min each in a crossover comparison. Both ventilation modes were set with a peak pressure of 15 cmH2O, positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O, a respiratory rate of 20/min, and a fraction of inspired oxygen at 0.3. All respiratory variables were collected every 15 min. Tidal volume and respiratory minute volume were significantly lower in FCV (n = 5) compared with PCV (n = 5) animals [4.6 vs. 6.6, MD -2.0 (95% CI -2.6 to -1.4) mL/kg; P < 0.001 and 7.3 vs. 9.5, MD -2.2 (95% CI -3.3 to -1.0) L/min; P = 0.006]. Notwithstanding these differences, CO2-removal as well as oxygenation was not inferior in FCV compared with PCV. Mechanical ventilation with identical ventilator settings resulted in lower tidal volumes and consecutive minute volume in FCV compared with PCV. This finding can be explained physically by the continuous gas flow pattern in FCV that necessitates a lower alveolar pressure amplitude. Interestingly, gas exchange was comparable in both groups, which is suggestive of improved ventilation efficiency at a continuous gas flow pattern.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study examined the effects of a continuous (flow-controlled ventilation, FCV) vs. decelerating (pressure-controlled ventilation, PCV) gas flow pattern during mechanical ventilation. It was shown that FCV necessitates a lower alveolar pressure amplitude leading to reduced applied tidal volumes and consequently minute volume. Notwithstanding these differences, CO2-removal as well as oxygenation was not inferior in FCV compared with PCV, which is suggestive of improved gas exchange efficiency at a continuous gas flow pattern.

Surgical bleeding in patients undergoing posterior lumbar inter-body fusion surgery: a randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of two mechanical ventilation mode types.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to compare the effect of using volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) versus pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) on blood loss in patients undergoing posterior lumbar inter-body fusion (PLIF) surgery. METHODS: In a randomized, single-blinded, parallel design, 78 patients, candidates for PLIF surgery, were randomly allocated into two groups of 39 to be mechanically ventilated using VCV or PCV mode. All the patients were operated in prone position by one surgeon. Amount of intraoperative surgical bleeding, transfusion requirement, surgeon satisfaction, hemodynamic parameters, heart rate, and blood pressure were measured as outcomes. RESULTS: PCV group showed slightly better outcomes than VCV group in terms of mean blood loss (431 cc vs. 465 cc), transfusion requirement (0.40 vs. 0.43 unit), and surgeon satisfaction (82.1% vs. 74.4%); however, the differences were not statistically significant. Diastolic blood pressure 90 and 105 min after induction were significantly lower in PCV group (P = 0.043-0.019, respectively); however, blood pressure at other times, hemoglobin levels, and mean heart rate were similar in two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing posterior lumbar inter-body fusion surgery, mode of ventilation cannot make significant difference in terms of blood loss; however, some minor benefits in outcomes may lead to the selection of PCV rather than VCV. More studies with larger sample size, and investigating more factors may be needed.

Individualized flow-controlled versus conventional pressure-controlled ventilation in on-pump heart surgery (FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In on-pump cardiac surgery, lungs are at high risk of periprocedural organ impairment because of atelectasis formation, ventilator-induced lung injury, and hyperinflammation due to the cardiopulmonary bypass which results in postoperative pulmonary complications in half of this patient population. The new ventilation mode flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) uniquely allows full control of ins- and expiratory airway flows. This approach reduces the mechanical power of invasive ventilation as a possible cause of ventilator-induced lung injury. The scope of FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG is to compare perioperative individualized FCV with best clinical practice pressure-controlled ventilation (PVC) modes in patients with elective on-pump cardiac surgery procedures. We hypothesize that the postoperative inflammatory response can be reduced by the perioperative application of FCV compared to PCV. METHODS: FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG is a single-center, randomized, parallel-group trial with two intervention arms: perioperative PCV modes (n = 70, PCV group) with an individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and a tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg predicted bodyweight compared to perioperative FCV (n = 70, FCV group) with an individualized PEEP and driving pressure, resulting in a liberal tidal volume. As the primary study endpoint interleukin 8 plasma level is assessed 6 h after cardiopulmonary bypass as a surrogate biomarker of systemic and pulmonary inflammation. As secondary aims clinically relevant patient outcomes are analyzed, e.g., perioperative lung function regarding oxygenation indices, postoperative pulmonary and extra-pulmonary complications, SIRS-free days as well as ICU and total inpatient stays. As additional sub-studies with an exploratory approach perioperative right ventricular function parameters are assessed by echocardiography and perioperative lung aeration by electrical impedance tomography. DISCUSSION: Current paradigms regarding protective low tidal volume ventilation are consciously left in the FCV intervention group in order to reduce mechanical power as a determinant of ventilator-induced lung injury in this high-risk patient population and procedures. This approach will be compared in a randomized controlled trial with current best clinical practice PCV in FLOWVENTIN HEARTSURG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00018956 . Registered on 12 June 2020 (Version 1), last update on 22 August 2022 (Version 4).

Comparisons of Mechanical Power and Respiratory Mechanics in Pressure-Controlled Ventilation and Volume-Controlled Ventilation during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Elderly Patients.

We compared the effects of pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation (PCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) on respiratory mechanics and mechanical power (MP) in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopy. Fifty patients aged 65-80 years scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to either the VCV group (n = 25) or the PCV group (n = 25). The ventilator had the same settings in both modes. The change in MP over time was insignificant between the groups (p = 0.911). MP significantly increased during pneumoperitoneum in both groups compared with anesthesia induction (IND). The increase in MP from IND to 30 min after pneumoperitoneum (PP30) was not different between the VCV and PCV groups. The change in driving pressure (DP) over time were significantly different between the groups during surgery, and the increase in DP from IND to PP30 was significantly higher in the VCV group than in the PCV group (both p = 0.001). Changes in MP during PCV and VCV were similar in elderly patients, and MP increased significantly during pneumoperitoneum in both groups. However, MP did not reach clinical significance (≥12 J/min). In contrast, the PCV group had a significantly lower increase in DP after pneumoperitoneum than the VCV group.