Physicochemical, antimicrobial, and biological properties of White-MTAFlow.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a new material containing tantalum oxide as an alternative radiopacifier, and a water-based gel for hydration, in comparison with two calcium silicate-based cement: ProRoot MTA and Biodentine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ProRoot MTA (Dentsply), Biodentine (Septodont), and a new hydraulic calcium silicate cement White-MTAFlow (Ultradent) (in 'thin' consistency) were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The interaction with dentin was also assessed using SEM and EDS. Physical and chemical properties radiopacity, setting time, linear flow, volumetric central filling, and lateral flow, pH, and volume change were investigated together with the color luminosity (L) and color change (ΔE). The agar diffusion and direct contact antimicrobial activity, and methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium-bromide (MTT) cytotoxicity using human fibroblast cells were also evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed at a 5% significance level. RESULTS: All materials were composed of tricalcium and dicalcium silicate but had different radiopacifiers, and calcium hydroxide (portlandite) deposition was detected in XRD analysis. White-MTAFlow exhibited radiopacity values in accordance with ISO standard, and the longest setting time. The water-based gel provided the highest linear flow, a comparable cavity central filling, and the highest groove-lateral flow in the volumetric flow analysis. White-MTAFlow exhibited an alkalinity reduction, and Biodentine, a progressive increase of pH values after 28 days. However, similar volume loss for White-MTAFlow was assessed in comparison to Biodentine after the 28-day immersion. White-MTAFlow showed the highest L value (91.5), and ProRoot MTA the lowest (78.1) due to dentin staining caused by bismuth migration. None of the materials exhibited inhibition halos against the tested bacteria, and similar turbidity values were obtained after 48 h in direct contact with E. faecalis, indicating an upregulation to bacterial growth. White-MTAFlow showed MTT cytocompatibility similarly to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: White-MTAFlow in 'thin' consistency presents comparable physicochemical, biological, and antimicrobial properties to ProRoot MTA and Biodentine, and does not cause color alteration in dentin. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: White-MTAFlow is a suitable material for use as reparative endodontic cement. Further studies considering its biocompatibility are necessary.

Fracture resistance of teeth obturated with two different types of mineral trioxide aggregate cements / Resistência à fratura de dentes obturados com dois tipos diferentes de cimentos agregados de trióxido minera

Objective: Endodontically obturated teeth have lower fracture resistance depending on the obturating material and technique. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate the influence of ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa Division) and OrthoMTA III (BioMTA, Daejeon, Korea) as an obturating material on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Material and Methods: Thirty extracted human maxillary central incisors were decoronated and instrumented using Protaper instruments (size F5). Irrigation was performed with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite between each instrument change followed by 7% maleic acid for one minute. Finally, canals were flushed with 5 ml of PBS solution for one minute. Samples were then divided into three groups. Group I- positive control (no root canal filling); Group II- obturation with ProRoot MTA; Group III- obturation with OrthoMTA III. Ten teeth were randomly selected as a negative control in which no treatment was performed. All the specimens were then subjected to fracture strength testing using universal testing machine. For evaluation of biomineralization, six maxillary central incisors were divided into two groups. Group I obturated with ProRoot MTA and group II obturated with OrthoMTA III. These samples were subjected to SEM analysis. Results: Positive control group demonstrated the least fracture resistance, while OrthoMTA III group showed the highest fracture resistance. There was no significant difference between negative control group and ProRoot MTA groups (p=0.821). OrthoMTA III group showed better tubular biomineralization when compared to ProRoot MTA. Conclusions: Root canals obturated with OrthoMTA III had better fracture resistance and increased tubular biomineralization compared to ProRoot MTA. Since root canals obturated with OrthoMTA III had better fracture resistance, it can be used as a promising obturating material.(AU)

Objetivo: Dentes obturados endodonticamente apresentam menor resistência à fratura, dependendo do material e da técnica de obturação. Portanto, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência do ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Sirona, Tulsa Division) e OrthoMTA III (BioMTA, Daejeon, Coréia) como material obturador na resistência à fratura de dentes tratados endodonticamente. Material e Métodos: Trinta incisivos centrais superiores humanos extraídos foram decoronados e instrumentados com instrumentos Protaper (tamanho F5). A irrigação foi realizada com hipoclorito de sódio a 2,5% entre cada troca de instrumento, seguida por ácido maleico a 7% por um minuto. Finalmente, os canais foram lavados com 5 ml de solução de PBS por um minuto. As amostras foram então divididas em três grupos. Grupo I - controle positivo(sem preenchimento do canal radicular); Grupo II - obturação com ProRoot MTA; Grupo III -obturação com OrthoMTA III. Dez dentes foram selecionados aleatoriamente como controle negativo, no qual nenhum tratamento foi realizado. Todas as amostras foram então submetidas atestes de resistência à fratura usando uma máquina de teste universal. Para avaliação da biomineralização, seis incisivos centrais superiores foram divididos em dois grupos: grupo Iobturado com ProRoot MTA e grupo II obturado com OrthoMTA III. Essas amostras foram submetidas à análise SEM. Resultados: O grupo controle positivo demonstrou a menor resistência à fratura, enquanto o grupo OrthoMTA III apresentou a maior resistência à fratura. Não houve diferença significativa entre o grupo controle negativo e os grupos ProRoot MTA (p= 0,821). O grupo OrthoMTA III apresentou melhor biomineralização tubular quando comparado ao ProRoot MTA. Conclusões: Os canais radiculares obturados com OrthoMTA III apresentaram melhor resistência à fratura e maior biomineralização tubular em comparação como ProRoot MTA. Como os canais radiculares obturados com OrthoMTA III apresentaram melhor resistência à fratura, podendo ser utilizado como um material obturador promissor.(AU)

Effect of ProRoot MTA® and Biodentine® on osteoclastic differentiation and activity of mouse bone marrow macrophages

Abstract Objectives This investigation aimed to assess the differentiation inhibitory effects of ProRoot MTA® (PMTA) and Biodentine® (BIOD) on osteoclasts originated from murine bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) and compare these effects with those of alendronate (ALD). Materials and Methods Mouse BMMs were cultured to differentiate into osteoclasts with macrophage colony-stimulating factor and receptor activator of NF-κB (RANKL), treated with lipopolysaccharide. After application with PMTA, BIOD, or ALD, cell toxicities were examined using WST-1 assay kit, and RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation and activities were determined by resorption pit formation assay and tartrate-resistant acid phosphate (TRAP) staining. The mRNA levels of osteoclast activity-related genes were detected with quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction. Expressions of molecular signaling pathways were assessed by western blot. All data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test (p<0.05). Results Mouse BMMs applied with PMTA, BIOD, or ALD showed highly reduced levels of TRAP-positive osteoclasts. The BIOD treated specimens suppressed mRNA expressions of cathepsin K, TRAP, and c-Fos. Nonetheless, it showed a lower effect than PMTA or ALD applications. Compared with ALD, PMTA and BIOD decreased RANKL-mediated phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and IκBα. Conclusions PMTA and BIOD showed the inhibitory effect on osteoclast differentiation and activities similar to that of ALD through IκB phosphorylation and suppression of ERK signaling pathways.

Evaluación de la citotoxicidad de distintos cementos selladores endodónticos en cultivos de fibroblastos gingivales / Citotoxicity assessment of different endodontic-use sealing cements in gingival fibroblast cultures

El objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar in vitro la respuesta de fibroblastos gingivales contra diferentes selladores endodónticos mediante cultivos celulares, en un lapso de 96 horas. Los resultados obtenidos a intervalos de tiempo de 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 24, 48, 72 y 96 horas fueron utilizados para determinar la citotoxicidad de los selladores. Cultivos de fibroblastos gingivales sin ningún sellador y con Sealapex fueron utilizados como controles positivos y negativos respectivamente. Los resultados fueron comparados con los controles negativos y analizados estadísticamente por medio de la prueba t Dunnett (p ≤ 0.05). Los cementos selladores investigados fueron: ProRoot MTA gris y blanco CPM, MTA Angelus, Sealapex y GuttaFlow. Los resultados demostraron que a pesar de que el ProRoot MTA (gris y blanco) MTA Angelus, CPM y GuttaFlow demostraron tener un potencial citotóxico menor que el Sealapex, no se encontraron diferencias estadísticas significativas.

The aim of the present study was the in vitro evaluation of the response, within 96 hours, of gingival fibroblast cultures with respect to different endodontic sealers. Results obtained at time intervals of 0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours were used to determine sealers' cytotoxicity. Gingival fibroblasts cultures without root canal sealer and with Sealapex were used as negative and positive controls respectively. Results were compared with negative controls and statistically analyzed with t Dunnett test (p ≤ 0.05). Assessed sealing cements were: ProRoot MTA, grey and white, CPM, MTA Angelus, Sealapex and GuttaFlow. Results showed that even though ProRoot MTA (grey and white) MTA Angelus, CPM and GuttaFlow exhibited lower cytotoxic potential than Sealapex, no statistical significant differences were established.