[Localized scleroderma]. / Lokalisierte Sklerodermie.

Localized scleroderma (LS), also called circumscribed scleroderma or morphea, comprises a heterogeneous group of diseases that can be classified into four subtypes: limited, linear, generalized, and mixed LS. All manifestations are primarily due to chronic progressive fibrosis of the skin or structures close to the skin. Involvement of internal organs or the transition to systemic sclerosis is excluded by definition. A distinction is made between forms that primarily affect the skin (up to the dermis) or that severely involve subcutaneous fat tissue, muscle fascia or muscles. A detailed examination is required for clinical diagnosis. In order to improve comparability of findings, photo documentation and the use of clinical scores should be carried out. For superficial subtypes the use of topical glucocorticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors or phototherapy is initially recommended, whereas for severe forms with deep involvement or overall therapy refractoriness, the diagnosis should first be expanded and systemic therapy initiated at an early stage. Especially, in cross joint or extremity-dominant forms of linear LS or in cases with head and neck involvement, such as en coup de sabre, Parry-Romberg syndrome and other subtypes with a prominent musculoskeletal affection, an MRI examination should be arranged. Depending on location, an ophthalmological, neurological, orthodontic, rheumatological or orthopedic consultation may be necessary. For systemic therapy, methotrexate alone or in combination with systemic glucocorticosteroids as pulse therapy is recommended as first-line treatment.

Role of BAL and Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) in Patients with Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Background: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) encompass a diverse group of disorders affecting the lung interstitium, leading to inflammation, fibrosis, and impaired respiratory function. Currently, the identification of new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for ILDs turns out to be necessary. Several studies show the role of KL-6 in various types of interstitial lung disease and suggest that serum KL-6 levels can be used as a prognostic marker of disease. The aim of this study was to analyze KL-6 expression either in serum or bronchoalveolar lavage samples in order to: (i) make a serum vs. BAL comparison; (ii) better understand the local behavior of fibrosis vs. the systemic one; and (iii) evaluate any differences in patients with progressive fibrosis (PPF) versus patients with non-progressive fibrosis (nPPF). Methods: We used qRT-PCR to detect KL-6 expression both in serum and BAL samples. Mann-Whitney's U test was used to compare the differential expression between groups. Results: In serum, KL-6 is more highly expressed in PPF than in non-progressive fibrosis (p = 0.0295). This difference is even more significant in BAL (p < 0.001). Therefore, it is clear that KL-6 values are related to disease progression. Significant differences were found by making a comparison between BAL and serum. KL-6 was markedly higher in serum than BAL (p = 0.0146). Conclusions: This study identifies KL-6 as a promising biomarker for the severity of the fibrosing process and disease progression in ILDs, with significantly higher levels observed in PPF compared to nPPF. Moreover, the marked difference in KL-6 levels between serum and BAL emphasizes its potential diagnostic and prognostic relevance, providing enlightening insights into both the local and systemic aspects of ILDs.

Factors for progressive pulmonary fibrosis in connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Progressive fibrosis can occur in connective tissue disease (CTD)-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) and make the prognosis worse. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate factors related to progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) phenotype in CTD-ILDs. DESIGN: Medical records of patients diagnosed as CTD and ILD at a single, tertiary hospital in South Korea were retrospectively reviewed. METHODS: Patients whose lung functions were followed up for more than a year were included in analysis. PPF was defined as forced vital capacity (FVC) declined ⩾10% or diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLco) ⩾15%. RESULTS: Of 110 patients with CTD-ILD, 24.5% progressed into PPF. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Sjogren's disease accounted for more than 63% of PPF. Compositions of CTD type were similar between PPF and non-PPF. Clinical characteristics and proportion of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on chest images were also similar between PPF and non-PPF. Approximately 10% of patients in both groups were treated with anti-fibrotic agents. Use of systemic steroids and/or other immunomodulating agents lowered the risk of developing PPF in CTD-ILD patients after adjusting for gender-age-physiology score and smoking status (adjusted odds ratio: 0.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.07-0.85). CONCLUSION: About a quarter of CTD-ILD progressed into PPF. The use of immunomodulating agents lowered the risk of developing PPF. To improve outcomes of patients, future studies need to detect patients at higher risk for PPF earlier and set up clinical guidelines for treatment strategies in the process of PPF.

Characterizing the lavage and serum cytokine profiles of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features and their implications for progressive fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether cytokines could be potential biomarkers to predict the occurrence of progressive fibrosis (PF) phenotype among interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) patients. METHODS: This study prospectively collected 51 IPAF and 15 Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) patients who were diagnosed at First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from July 2020 to June 2021. All IPAF patients were followed up for one year to assess the development of PF phenotype. Paired Broncho Alveolar Lavage Fluid (BALF) and serum samples were collected at enrolment and analyzed for differences in 39 cytokines expression. Principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis were conducted to identify a high-risk subgroup of IPAF patients for developing the PF phenotype. Finally, cytokine differences were compared between subgroups to identify potential biomarkers for PF-IPAF occurrence. RESULTS: According to the PCA analysis, 81.25% of PF-IPAF patients share overlapped BALF cytokine profiles with IPF. Cluster analysis indicated IPAF patients in subtype 2 had a higher risk to develop PF phenotype within one year (P = 0.048), characterized by higher levels of CCL2, CXCL12 and lower lymphocyte proportion (LYM%) in BALF. Elevated levels of BALF CCL2 (>299.16 pg./ml) or CXCL12 (>600.115 pg./ml) were associated with a significantly higher risk of developing PF phenotype within one year follow-up period (P = 0.009, 0.001). CONCLUSION: PF-IPAF phenotype exhibits similar inflammatory cytokine profiles to IPF. Cytokine CCL2, CXCL12, and LYM% in BALF serving as potential biomarkers for predicting the PF phenotype in IPAF patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Register: Qian Han, Website: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=61619, Registration number: ChiCTR2000040998.

Novedades diagnósticas y terapéuticas en fibrosis pulmonar progresiva / Diagnostic and Therapeutic Developments in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis

Además de la fibrosis pulmonar idiopática (FPI), otras enfermedades pulmonares intersticiales difusas (EPID) desarrollan fibrosis pulmonar, lo cual ocurre en una proporción variable en función de la entidad. Este componente fibrótico puede progresar a pesar de las medidas terapéuticas adoptadas, lo que se conoce como fibrosis pulmonar progresiva (FPP). En este contexto, la FPP no es una entidad per se sino una condición clínica o comportamiento común que pueden desarrollar diferentes EPID fibrosantes, la cual compromete el pronóstico del paciente. La FPP se identifica por criterios de empeoramiento clínico, fisiológico y/o radiológico durante el seguimiento del paciente. Ensayos clínicos aleatorizados en pacientes con FPI o EPID no-FPI progresiva han demostrado que el tratamiento con medicamentos anti-fibróticos, sea nintedanib o pirfenidona, enlentece su progresión. Actualmente, se abre una nueva era en el manejo clínico de este subgrupo de pacientes y una ventana de oportunidad para investigar incógnitas aún existentes. (AU)

In addition to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), other diffuse interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are also associated with pulmonary fibrosis and occur in a variable proportion of patients, depending on the entity. The name given to this fibrotic component, that may progress despite treatment, is progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). In this context, PPF is not an entity per se but a common clinical condition or behavior that may occur in association with different types of fibrosing diffuse ILDs, compromising patient prognosis. PPF is identified from worsening clinical, physiological, and/or radiological criteria during patient follow-up. Randomized clinical trials in patients with IPF or progressive non-IPF ILD have shown that treatment with antifibrotic drugs, either nintedanib or pirfenidone, slows progression. We are seeing the start of a new era in the clinical management of this subgroup of patients, offering the perfect opportunity for exploring still uncharted territories. (AU)

[Translated article] Diagnostic and Therapeutic Developments in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis / Novedades diagnósticas y terapéuticas en fibrosis pulmonar progresiva

In addition to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), other diffuse interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are also associated with pulmonary fibrosis and occur in a variable proportion of patients, depending on the entity. The name given to this fibrotic component, that may progress despite treatment, is progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). In this context, PPF is not an entity per se but a common clinical condition or behavior that may occur in association with different types of fibrosing diffuse ILDs, compromising patient prognosis. PPF is identified from worsening clinical, physiological, and/or radiological criteria during patient follow-up. Randomized clinical trials in patients with IPF or progressive non-IPF ILD have shown that treatment with antifibrotic drugs, either nintedanib or pirfenidone, slows progression. We are seeing the start of a new era in the clinical management of this subgroup of patients, offering the perfect opportunity for exploring still uncharted territories. (AU)

ResumenAdemás de la fibrosis pulmonar idiopática (FPI), otras enfermedades pulmonares intersticiales difusas (EPID) desarrollan fibrosis pulmonar, lo cual ocurre en una proporción variable en función de la entidad. Este componente fibrótico puede progresar a pesar de las medidas terapéuticas adoptadas, lo que se conoce como fibrosis pulmonar progresiva (FPP). En este contexto, la FPP no es una entidad per se sino una condición clínica o comportamiento común que pueden desarrollar diferentes EPID fibrosantes, la cual compromete el pronóstico del paciente. La FPP se identifica por criterios de empeoramiento clínico, fisiológico y/o radiológico durante el seguimiento del paciente. Ensayos clínicos aleatorizados en pacientes con FPI o EPID no-FPI progresiva han demostrado que el tratamiento con medicamentos anti-fibróticos, sea nintedanib o pirfenidona, enlentece su progresión. Actualmente, se abre una nueva era en el manejo clínico de este subgrupo de pacientes y una ventana de oportunidad para investigar incógnitas aún existentes. (AU)

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Developments in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis. / Novedades diagnósticas y terapéuticas en fibrosis pulmonar progresiva.

In addition to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), other diffuse interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are also associated with pulmonary fibrosis and occur in a variable proportion of patients, depending on the entity. The name given to this fibrotic component, that may progress despite treatment, is progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). In this context, PPF is not an entity per se but a common clinical condition or behavior that may occur in association with different types of fibrosing diffuse ILDs, compromising patient prognosis. PPF is identified from worsening clinical, physiological, and/or radiological criteria during patient follow-up. Randomized clinical trials in patients with IPF or progressive non-IPF ILD have shown that treatment with antifibrotic drugs, either nintedanib or pirfenidone, slows progression. We are seeing the start of a new era in the clinical management of this subgroup of patients, offering the perfect opportunity for exploring still uncharted territories.

Progressive fibrosis in interstitial lung diseases - proposed definition and management.

Interstitial lung diseases may have an unpredictably progressive course, which is manifested as progression of pulmonary fibrosis, causing an increasing impairment of lung function affecting a poor prognosis. The possibility of an effective antifibrotic treatment is a chance for patients to slow down the progression of the disease, perhaps even extend their life. For this reason, standardization of the definition as well as identification criteria for progressive fibrosis interstitial lung disease is a method for optimizing the management in this group of patients.

Estimates of epidemiology, mortality and disease burden associated with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease in France (the PROGRESS study).

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on the epidemiology, survival estimates and healthcare resource utilisation and associated costs of patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) in France. An algorithm for extracting claims data was developed to indirectly identify and describe patients with PF-ILD in the French national administrative healthcare database. METHODS: The French healthcare database, the Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS), includes data related to ambulatory care, hospitalisations and death for 98.8% of the population. In this study, algorithms based on age, diagnosis and healthcare consumption were created to identify adult patients with PF-ILD other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis between 2010 and 2017. Incidence, prevalence, survival estimates, clinical features and healthcare resource usage and costs were described among patients with PF-ILD. RESULTS: We identified a total of 14,413 patients with PF-ILD. Almost half of them (48.1%) were female and the mean (± standard deviation) age was 68.4 (± 15.0) years. Between 2010 and 2017, the estimated incidence of PF-ILD ranged from 4.0 to 4.7/100,000 person-years and the estimated prevalence from 6.6 to 19.4/100,000 persons. The main diagnostic categories represented were exposure-related ILD other than hypersensitivity pneumonitis (n = 3486; 24.2%), idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (n = 3113; 21.6%) and rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD (n = 2521; 17.5%). Median overall survival using Kaplan-Meier estimation was 3.7 years from the start of progression. During the study, 95.2% of patients had ≥ 1 hospitalisation for respiratory care and 34.3% were hospitalised in an intensive care unit. The median (interquartile range) total specific cost per patient during the follow-up period was €25,613 (10,622-54,287) and the median annual cost per patient was €18,362 (6856-52,026), of which €11,784 (3003-42,097) was related to hospitalisations. Limitations included the retrospective design and identification of cases through an algorithm in the absence of chest high-resolution computed tomography scans and pulmonary function tests. CONCLUSIONS: This large, real-world, longitudinal study provides important insights into the characteristics, epidemiology and healthcare resource utilisation and costs associated with PF-ILD in France using a comprehensive and exhaustive database, and provides vital evidence that PF-ILD represents a high burden on both patients and healthcare services. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03858842. ISRCTN, ISRCTN12345678. Registered 3 January 2019-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03858842.

A specific phenotype of interstitial lung disease—progressive pulmonary fibrosis / 中国医师杂志

The diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are difficult, due to the complicated classification and the unknown etiology. In the scope of ILD, in addition to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), there are some diseases still progressing after active treatment, the degree of fibrosis continues to aggravate, lung function continues to deteriorate and the early mortality rate rises. Their prognosis are similar to IPF. We collectively refer to these diseases with similar progression as progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD). PF-ILD is a new concept which was put forward in recent years. However, there is no clear consensus to guide the diagnosis and treatment of such diseases. This review comprehensively elaborates the definition, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and future research directions of PF-ILD, which will help us better understand and manage PF-ILD in the future.

New Era of Management Concept on Pulmonary Fibrosis with Revisiting Framework of Interstitial Lung Diseases.

The disease concept of interstitial lung disease with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis at its core has been relied on for many years depending on morphological classification. The separation of non-specific interstitial pneumonia with a relatively good prognosis from usual interstitial pneumonia is also based on the perception that morphology enables predict the prognosis. Beginning with dust-exposed lungs, initially, interstitial pneumonia is classified by anatomical pathology. Diagnostic imaging has dramatically improved the diagnostic technology for surviving patients through the introduction of high-resolution computed tomography scan. And now, with the introduction of therapeutics, the direction of diagnosis is turning. It can be broadly classified into to make known the importance of early diagnosis, and to understand the importance of predicting the speed of progression/deterioration of pathological conditions. For this reason, the insight of "early lesions" has been discussed. There are reports that the presence or absence of interstitial lung abnormalities affects the prognosis. Searching for a biomarker is another prognostic indicator search. However, as is the case with many chronic diseases, pathological conditions that progress linearly are extremely rare. Rather, it progresses while changing in response to environmental factors. In interstitial lung disease, deterioration of respiratory functions most closely reflect prognosis. Treatment is determined by combining dynamic indicators as faithful indicators of restrictive impairments. Reconsidering the history being classified under the disease concept, the need to reorganize treatment targets based on common pathological phenotype is under discussed. What is the disease concept? That aspect changes with the discussion of improving prognosis.

Healthcare Resources Utilization and Costs of Patients with Non-IPF Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease Based on Insurance Claims in the USA.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the classic progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD), but some patients with ILDs other than IPF also develop a progressive fibrosing phenotype (PF-ILD). Information on use and cost of healthcare resources in patients with PF-ILD is limited. METHODS: We used USA-based medical insurance claims (2014-2016) to assess use and cost of healthcare resources in PF-ILD. Patients with at least two ILD claims and at least one pulmonologist visit were considered to have ILD. Pulmonologist visit frequency was used as a proxy to identify PF-ILD (at least four visits in 2016, or at least three more visits in 2016 vs. 2014). RESULTS: Of 2517 patients with non-IPF ILD, 15% (n = 373) had PF-ILD. Mean annual medical costs associated with ILD claims were $35,364 in patients with non-IPF PF-ILD versus $20,211 in the non-IPF ILD population. In 2016, patients with non-IPF PF-ILD made more hospital ILD claims than patients with non-IPF ILD (10.5 vs. 4.7). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest higher disease severity and overall healthcare use for patients with a non-IPF ILD manifesting a progressive fibrosing phenotype (non-IPF PF-ILD).

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a group of similar lung conditions with lung fibrosis, scarring, or inflammation of the lung tissue. Some patients with ILD also have worsening lung fibrosis, referred to as "progressive fibrosis" (PF-ILD). The most common type of PF-ILD is idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which has no known cause. Although much is known about IPF, there is limited information available on how often patients with ILDs other than IPF (non-IPF ILD) use healthcare, or the costs associated with the disease. This study used US medical insurance claims to gain further insights. The study examined data from over 2500 patients with non-IPF ILD, of which 15% had PF-ILD. Patients defined as having PF-ILD had higher yearly medical costs and used healthcare services more often than other patients with ILD. This study highlights the economic burden of non-IPF ILD with progressive fibrosis (non-IPF PF-ILD).

Modeling Progressive Fibrosis with Pluripotent Stem Cells Identifies an Anti-fibrotic Small Molecule.

Progressive organ fibrosis accounts for one-third of all deaths worldwide, yet preclinical models that mimic the complex, progressive nature of the disease are lacking, and hence, there are no curative therapies. Progressive fibrosis across organs shares common cellular and molecular pathways involving chronic injury, inflammation, and aberrant repair resulting in deposition of extracellular matrix, organ remodeling, and ultimately organ failure. We describe the generation and characterization of an in vitro progressive fibrosis model that uses cell types derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. Our model produces endogenous activated transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) and contains activated fibroblastic aggregates that progressively increase in size and stiffness with activation of known fibrotic molecular and cellular changes. We used this model as a phenotypic drug discovery platform for modulators of fibrosis. We validated this platform by identifying a compound that promotes resolution of fibrosis in in vivo and ex vivo models of ocular and lung fibrosis.

A preliminary study of lung abnormalities on HRCT in patients of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease with progressive fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study evaluates lung abnormalities on high-resolution CT (HRCT) and clarifies which abnormality can predict the progressive fibrosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). OBJECTS AND METHODS: We identified 1096 RA patients, and enrolled 213 patients with a diagnosis of RA-ILD who underwent serial chest HRCT. Clinical data of the patients were obtained. The presence, extent, and distribution of lung abnormalities were assessed on CT scans. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine positive indicators with predictive value for progressive fibrosis, and 2 × 2 contingency tables were constructed to assess their diagnostic efficiency. RESULT: Of 213 RA-ILD patients, 106 (49.8%) were diagnosed as progressive fibrosis. The rates of advanced age, male, smoking history, shortness of breath, and anti-CCP antibody high titer positive were higher, and RA duration was shorter in progressive fibrosis patients. Reticular pattern (RP), peribronchovascular interstitium (PBVI) thickening, interlobular septal thickening, and traction bronchiolectasis were more common in the progressive fibrosis group (84.9% vs 42.1%, P < 0.001; 79.3% vs 45.8%, P < 0.001; 74.5% vs 43.9%, P < 0.001; 67.0% vs 40.2%, P < 0.001; respectively). Lung abnormalities demonstrated subpleural predominance, and the subpleural RP and/or interlobular septal thickening had a wide distribution in the progressive fibrosis group (71.7% vs 14.0%, P < 0.001). The overall extent of lung abnormalities was more extensive in the progressive fibrosis group (18.4% vs 14.2%, P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that a wide distribution of subpleural RP and/or interlobular septal thickening (OR, 18.15) and PBVI thickening (OR, 4.98) were independent risk factors predictive of progressive fibrosis. For the combination of these two CT abnormalities, sensitivity was 63.2%, specificity was 92.5%, positive likelihood ratio was 8.5, and negative likelihood ratio was 0.4 in predicting progressive fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: A wide distribution of subpleural RP and/or interlobular septal thickening and PBVI thickening on HRCT appear predictive of progressive fibrosis in RA-ILD. The combined evaluation of these two CT abnormalities has a good judgment value. Key Points • We designed this study to investigate the risk factors for progressive fibrosis in patients with RA-ILD. Factors including clinical, physiological, radiological and therapeutic variables were all included in the data analysis. • Our results showed HRCT abnormalities, rather than other parameters, appeared predictive of progressive fibrosis in RA-ILD. • The methods and results of image evaluation in this article would provide reference to rheumatologists in identifying early stage of progressive fibrosis which helps to improve poor prognosis of RA-ILD.