Comparison of quality of life after radical treatment in prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy versus external radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the functional and quality of life results in patients treated with curative intent for localized prostate cancer during 2015 in our hospital. METHOD: 77 patients treated by radical prostatectomy or external radiotherapy with androgen deprivation were prospective enrolled. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) questionnaire at 3-year follow-up and Spanish Questionnaire on Quality of Life in Patients with Prostate Cancer (CAVIPRES-30) at diagnosis and at 3-year follow-up were registered. RESULTS: 68 patients were included, 39 patients treated by radical prostatectomy and 29 received external radiotherapy with androgen deprivation. Among the operated patients, 61.5% were dry and 17.9% use three or more daily pads, compared to 72.4% and 6.8%, respectively, in the radiotherapy group. 48.7% of prostatectomized patients reported very poor or no capacity to have a sufficiently rigid erection, compared to 69% of the radiated group. After surgery, 43.6% considered bad or very bad quality-of-life, compared to 68.9% in the radiotherapy group. In the comparison of the data of the pre- and post-treatment questionnaire can be seen that the patients had a superior perception before the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated by surgery have a better perception of quality-of-life compared to those treated by radiotherapy.

OBJETIVO: Determinar y comparar los resultados funcionales y de calidad de vida de pacientes con cáncer de próstata tratados con intención curativa durante el año 2015 en nuestro centro. MÉTODO: Se incluyeron 77 pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical (PR) o radioterapia externa con terapia de deprivación androgénica (TDA). Se realizaron el Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) tras 3 años de seguimiento y el Cuestionario Español de Calidad de Vida en Pacientes con Cáncer de Próstata (CAVIPRES-30) al diagnóstico y a los 3 años. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 68 pacientes, 39 con PR y 29 con radioterapia más TDA. De los pacientes intervenidos, el 61.5% están secos y el 17.9% usan tres o más compresas, diarias frente al 72.4% y el 6.8%, respectivamente, en el grupo de radioterapia. El 48.7% de los prostatectomizados refieren erecciones muy malas o ninguna, frente al 69% de los radiados. Tras la cirugía, el 43.6% refieren mala o muy mala calidad de vida, frente al 68.9% de los radiados. En la comparación de los datos del cuestionario pre- y postratamiento, los pacientes tenían una percepción superior antes del procedimiento. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes tratados mediante cirugía tienen una mejor percepción de su calidad de vida relacionada con la salud que los radiados.

State of art of robotic prostatectomy: the way we do it in Catalonia, Spain.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (PLAR) seems to improve functional outcomes, however there is not a consensus of a standard procedure. The aim of this study was to identify the PLAR "state of art" in Catalonia, Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey-based study conducted among urologists across Catalonia, Spain. The survey was distributed through online platforms and the professional urology society. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata software, v20. RESULTS: 59 urologists completed the survey, revealing PLAR as the most commonly used technique (79.7%). Most urologist (70%) create the pneumoperitoneum using a controlled incision with direct access and 78.3% use the Airseal technology. The intraperitoneal approach is performed in >90% of cases. Endopelvic fascia preservation is not routinely performed. 34.5% of the survey not perform the dorsal vein complex suture. All preserves the bladder neck when oncologically safe. Nerve-vascular bundles bleeding control is performed using standard coagulation or suturing. 34% performed posterior reconstruction. Only use hemostatic devices when evident bleeding and 70% does not routinely left a drainage. Multivariable analysis showed that center volume had a significant independent association with dorsal venous complex suturing (OR 0.073, 95%CI 0.07-0.826), nerve-vascular bundles suturing hemostasis (OR 11.67, 95%CI 1.07-127.60) and endopelvic fascia preservation (OR 13.64, 95%CI 1.087-201.27), but there was no correlation with time the bladder catheter or days hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides an overview of the state of PLAR in Catalonia, Spain, showing significant variability and reflecting a commitment to advancing surgical technology and patient care.

Cirugía citorreductora en pacientes con cáncer de próstata oligometastásico. Revisión sistemática de la literatura científica / Cytoreductive surgery in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer. systematic review of the scientific literature

Introducción La aparición de pruebas de imagen más específicas y sensibles, junto con el empleo cada vez más extendido de técnicas mínimamente invasivas, ha centrado el interés urológico sobre el cáncer de próstata oligometastásico. A pesar de esto, aún queda por determinar el manejo óptimo de esta patología. Objetivo Evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de la cirugía citorreductora en pacientes con cáncer de próstata oligometastásico. Adquisición de la evidencia Revisión sistemática de la literatura científica (01/01/2010-31/12/2021) en las bases de datos Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, Agencias de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias y ClinicalTrials.gov. Los descriptores utilizados han sido prostatectomy, prostatic neoplasm, radical prostatectomy, y los términos de búsqueda libre prostatectomy y oligomestastasicprostate. Los criterios de inclusión fueron estudios con pacientes con cáncer de próstata oligometastásico e intervenidos mediante prostatectomía radical citorreductora (CRP). Síntesis de la evidencia La revisión sistemática incluyó cuatro estudios observacionales, dos ensayos clínicos y dos series de casos, de calidad moderada. Los resultados observados sugieren un beneficio en cuanto a eficacia en aquellos pacientes oligometastásico sometidos a una cirugía de próstata citorreductora. Por otro lado, la mayoría de estos estudios revelan una reducción en el número de las complicaciones locales cuando se compara con los mejores tratamientos sistémicos. Conclusiones La cirugía citorreductora en este grupo de pacientes, es un procedimiento seguro que reduce las complicaciones locales, que ofrece resultados prometedores en cuanto a supervivencia. Hasta la fecha, la falta de ensayos prospectivos limita el papel de esta opción terapéutica a entornos experimentales (AU)

Introduction Interest in oligometastatic prostate cancer has spiked due to the emergence of new evidence regarding more specific and accurate imaging, and the wider use of minimally invasive techniques. Nevertheless, the optimal management of this pathology is yet to be determined. Objective Assess the efficacy and safety of cytoreductive surgery in patients suffering from oligometastatic prostate cancer. Evidence gathering Systematic review of the scientific literature (01/01/2010-31/12/2021) within the MedLine, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, Scopus, Spanish Healthcare Technology Assessment Agencies (AETS, Agencias de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias) and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The keywords used were prostatectomy, prostatic neoplasm, radical prostatectomy; the free search terms were prostatectomy and oligometastaticprostate. The inclusion criteria comprised studies on patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer who had been operated on using radical cytoreductive prostatectomy. Evidence synthesis The systematic review included 4 observational studies, 2 clinical trials, and 2 case series, of moderate quality. The results observed suggest that oligometastatic prostate cancer patients who had undergone cytoreductive prostate surgery obtained a benefit in terms of efficacy. Conversely, the majority of these studies showed a reduction in the number of localized complications, when compared to the best systemic treatments. Conclusions Cytoreductive surgery in this group of patients is a safe procedure that reduces the incidence of localized complications and that presents promising results with regard to survival rates. To date, the lack of prospective trials limits the use of this therapeutic option to experimental environments (AU)

Preliminary results of the implementation of robotic radical prostatectomy in a major ambulatory surgery regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To report our initial experience with robotic radical prostatectomy as an outpatient procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent RRP as MAS (Major Ambulatory Surgery) at our center between March 2021 and May 2022. We collected baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative outcomes and postoperative data (need for unplanned medical care and complications at one month after surgery). Oncologic characteristics at disease diagnosis (PSA, staging, ISUP, MRI) and postoperative pathologic outcomes were collected. RESULTS: We identified a total of 35 patients with an average age of 60,8 ± 6,88 years and a BMI of 27 ± 2,9 Kg/m2. All patients had a low anesthetic risk and 25.71% had undergone previous abdominal surgery. The surgical time was 151,66 ± 42,15 min and the average blood loss was 301,2 ± 184,38 mL. Two patients (5.7%) were admitted for one night and 7 patients (20%) consulted the emergency department in the following month, of which 3 (8.57%) were readmitted. We recorded one intraoperative complication, seven mild postoperative complications (Clavien I-II) and one severe complication (Clavien IIIb). The severe complication occurred on the eighth postoperative day and was not related to the procedure being ambulatory. CONCLUSION: The absence of serious complications in the immediate postoperative period supports RRP in MAS as a safe technique for selected patients.

Resultados preliminares de la implementación de la prostatectomía radical robótica en régimen de cirugía mayor ambulatoria / Preliminary results of the implementation of robotic radical prostatectomy in a major ambulatory surgery regimen

Objetivo Reportar nuestra experiencia inicial de prostatectomía radical robótica (PRR) en régimen ambulatorio. Material y métodos Análisis retrospectivo de los pacientes intervenidos de PRR en cirugía mayor ambulatoria (CMA) en nuestro centro entre marzo de 2021 y mayo de 2022. Recopilamos las características basales de los pacientes, los resultados intraoperatorios y los datos del postoperatorio (necesidad de asistencia médica no planificada y complicaciones al mes de la cirugía). Se recogieron las características oncológicas al diagnóstico de la enfermedad (PSA, estadificación, ISUP, RMN) y el resultado anatomopatológico tras la intervención. Resultados Identificamos un total de 35 pacientes, con una edad promedio de 60,8 ±6,88 años y un IMC de 27 ±2,9kg/m2. Todos presentaban un riesgo anestésico bajo y un 25,71% tenían alguna cirugía abdominal previa. El tiempo quirúrgico fue de 151,66 ±42,15 minutos y el sangrado promedio fue de 301,2 ±184,38mililitros. Dos pacientes (5,7%) ingresaron la primera noche de la cirugía y 7 pacientes (20%) consultaron en urgencias en el mes siguiente, de los cuales 3 (8,57%) reingresaron. Registramos una complicación intraoperatoria, 7 complicaciones postoperatorias leves (ClavienI-II) y una complicación grave (ClavienIIIb). La complicación grave transcurrió al octavo día postoperatorio y no tuvo relación con la ambulatorización del procedimiento. Conclusión La ausencia de complicaciones graves en el postoperatorio inmediato avala la PRR en régimen de CMA como una técnica segura dirigida a pacientes seleccionados (AU)

Objective To report our initial experience with robotic radical prostatectomy (RRP) as an outpatient procedure. Material and methods Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent RRP as major ambulatory surgery (MAS) at our center between March 2021 and May 2022. We collected baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative outcomes and postoperative data (need for unplanned medical care and complications at one month after surgery). Oncologic characteristics at disease diagnosis (PSA, staging, ISUP, MRI) and postoperative pathologic outcomes were collected. Results We identified a total of 35 patients with an average age of 60,8 ±6,88years and a BMI of 27 ±2,9kg/m2. All patients had a low anesthetic risk and 25.71% had undergone previous abdominal surgery. The surgical time was 151,66 ±42,15minutes and the average blood loss was 301,2 ±184,38milliliters. Two patients (5.7%) were admitted for one night and 7 patients (20%) consulted the emergency department in the following month, of which 3 (8.57%) were readmitted. We recorded one intraoperative complication, 7 mild postoperative complications (ClavienI-II) and one severe complication (ClavienIIIb). The severe complication occurred on the eighth postoperative day and was not related to the procedure being ambulatory. Conclusion The absence of serious complications in the immediate postoperative period supports RRP in MAS as a safe technique for selected patients (AU)

La prostatectomía radical retropúbica abierta es todavía una técnica quirúrgica bien establecida para el tratamiento del cáncer de próstata / Open retropubic radical prostatectomy: Still a well-established surgical technique for prostate cancer management

Introducción Las opciones de tratamiento quirúrgico del cáncer de próstata han experimentado cambios significativos gracias a la expansión de la robótica. Sin embargo, la prostatectomía radical retropúbica abierta (PRA) seguirá realizándose en aquellos entornos con limitaciones económicas o con escaso acceso a la robótica. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar los resultados oncológicos a largo plazo, clasificar las tasas de complicaciones y examinar las tasas de recuperación temprana de la continencia en pacientes tratados con PRA. Métodos Identificamos a todos los pacientes sometidos a PRA en nuestra institución entre 2000 y 2020. Se utilizó un pad test (prueba de la compresa) estandarizado para determinar las tasas de continencia precoz tras la retirada del catéter; la continencia tardía, alrededor de un año después de la cirugía, se determinó mediante el número de compresas por día. Se utilizó la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo para informar las tasas de complicaciones. Las tasas de supervivencia libre de recidiva bioquímica (RB) y de supervivencia global (SG) se definieron mediante el método de Kaplan-Meier y el análisis log-rank. Se utilizaron modelos multivariantes de regresión de Cox para comprobar el efecto de los distintos factores sobre la recidiva bioquímica. Resultados Se analizaron los datos de 1.095 pacientes. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 93,4 meses. Se encontró una supervivencia global libre de RB a 10años y una SG del 73% y del 82%, respectivamente. Se observó una tasa de complicaciones de Clavien Dindo ≥3 en el 4,8% de los pacientes. La tasa de continencia precoz fue del 81,4% y la tasa de continencia tardía fue del 89,1%. El nivel de PSA preoperatorio, la suma de la puntuación de Gleason, el estadio pT, el estado de los ganglios linfáticos y el estado de los márgenes quirúrgicos fueron predictores independientes de RB (p<0,001). Entre las limitaciones del estudio están su diseño retrospectivo y unicéntrico (AU)

Introduction The surgical treatment options for prostate cancer have changed rapidly, given the expansion of robotics. However, open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) will continue to be performed in areas with financial limitations or with limited access to robotics. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term oncological outcomes, to categorize complication rates and to examine the early continence rates in patients treated with ORP. Methods We identified all patients who underwent ORP at our institution between 2000 and 2020. A standardized pad test was used to determine the early continence rates upon catheter removal, the late continence around a year after surgery was determined by the number of pads per day. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to report the complication rates. The biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were defined using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariable Cox-regression models were used to test the effect of different factors on biochemical recurrence. Results We analyzed 1095 patients. The median follow-up was 93.4months. An overall 10-year BCR-free survival and OS of 73% and 82% respectively was found. A complication rate for Clavien Dindo ≥3 was seen in 4.8% of patients. The early continence rate was 81.4% and the late continence 89.1%. Preoperative PSA level, Gleason score sum, pT stage, lymph node status, and surgical margin status were independent predictors of BCR (P<.001). Limitations include retrospective and single centre study design. Conclusions ORP is a surgical procedure that provides excellent oncological- and early continence-rates (AU)

Incidencia de la disfunción sexual eréctil asociada a la prostatectomía radical abierta y laparoscópica

Introducción: la dificultad o imposibilidad de lograr una actividad sexual satisfactoria a pesar de estar presentes las condiciones adecuadas para su desarrollo exitoso, se conoce como disfunción sexual. Si la dificultad consiste en alcanzar y mantener la erección necesaria para una penetración se produce una disfunción eréctil. Objetivo: describir la disfunción eréctil en los pacientes con cáncer de próstata sometidos a prostatectomía radical por vía abierta vs. laparoscópica, en el Hospital Universitario Comandante Faustino Pérez Hernández, de Matanzas, entre enero de 2010 y enero de 2020. Materiales y métodos: se realizó un estudio longitudinal retrospectivo en los 40 pacientes que acudieron a la Consulta Provincial de Cáncer de Próstata y les fue realizado cirugía radical, entre enero de 2010 y enero de 2020. Resultados: el 52,5 % de los pacientes tienen un promedio de edad entre 65 y 74 años. Un índice de comorbilidad de Charlson de 3 a 5 puntos predominó en un 75 % de la muestra. En la vía laparoscópica, todos los casos presentaron disfunción eréctil, siendo severa en el 50 % de ellos. El 22,5 % del total no la tuvieron, representando un 30 % de los operados por cirugía abierta. Conclusiones: la prostatectomía radical continúa siendo considerada uno de los tratamientos de elección del cáncer de próstata órgano-confinado. La causa principal de la presencia de disfunción eréctil se atribuye al procedimiento quirúrgico; la edad avanzada puede contribuir a empeorar el pronóstico y las enfermedades coadyuvantes. Son heterogéneos los resultados en la esfera sexual de la prostatectomía radical laparoscópica y la prostatectomía radical abierta, comparados con la bibliografía internacional.

Introduction: the difficulty or impossibility of achieving a successful sexual activity despite being present the adequate conditions for its successful development is known as sexual dysfunction. If the difficulty consists in reaching and maintaining the erection necessary for a penetration, erectile dysfunction occurs. Objective: to describe the erectile dysfunction in patients with prostate cancer undergoing open vs. laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, in the Comandante Faustino Perez Hernandez University Hospital, of Matanzas, between January 2010 and January 2020. Materials and methods: a longitudinal retrospective study was carried out in the 40 patients who attended Prostate Cancer Provincial Consultation and underwent radical surgery between January 2010 and January 2020. Results: 52.5% of the patients were aged between 65 and 74 on average. A Charlson comorbidity index of 3 to 5 points prevailed in 75% of the sample. In the laparoscopic pathway all the cases presented erectile dysfunction, being severe in 50% of them. 22.5% of the total did not have it, representing 30% of those operated by open surgery. Conclusions: radical prostatectomy continues to be considered one of the treatments of choice for organ-confined prostate cancer. The main cause of the presence of erectile dysfunction is attributed to the surgical procedure; advanced age can contribute to a worse prognosis and adjuvant diseases. The results in the sexual sphere of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy are heterogeneous compared with the international bibliography.

Identificación de parámetros pronósticos relativos a la técnica quirúrgica en pacientes tratados mediante prostatectomía radical robótica / Identifying prognostic parameters related to surgical technique in patients treated by robotic radical prostatectomy

Introducción y objetivo Los factores más estudiados en pacientes tratados mediante prostatectomía radical robótica son antígeno prostático específico (PSA) y las características patológicas de la biopsia y la pieza de prostatectomía. Los factores asociados a la técnica quirúrgica han sido poco estudiados y con resultados controvertidos. El objetivo es identificar todos los factores posibles de la cirugía y su relación con la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (SLE) y de metástasis. Pacientes y métodos Estudio prospectivo aprobado por el Comité de Ética, en pacientes intervenidos de prostatectomía radical robótica desde enero del 2009 con seguimiento mínimo de cinco años. Analizamos como posibles factores pronósticos: el cirujano, el tiempo quirúrgico, la pérdida sanguínea, el acceso fascial, las técnicas de continencia, la preservación de la fascia, las bandeletas neurovasculares, el cuello vesical, la uretra, la curva de aprendizaje y las complicaciones quirúrgicas. Realizamos comparaciones univariables y emparejadas de supervivencia mediante la estimación de Kaplan-Meier y long-rank tests. El nivel de significancia para comparaciones múltiples se estableció con ajuste False Discovery Rate (p ajustada [padj]). Resultados Cohorte de 667 pacientes con mediana de seguimiento de 69 meses. En el análisis univariante, el cirujano (padj = 0,018), la conservación de ligamentos puboprostáticos (padj = 0,02), la preservación de fascia endopélvica (padj = 0,001) y realizar suspensión parauretral (padj < 0,001) son factores de mal pronóstico para la SLE. La preservación de la fascia también afecta negativamente a la supervivencia libre de metástasis (SLM) (padj = 0,04). Las cirugías previas abdominales, la próstata, el tiempo de intervención, el sangrado, el tipo de uretra residual, el lóbulo medio, el acceso fascial, la conservación de bandeletas o cuello vesical, no tienen significancia estadística (AU)

Introduction and objective The most frequently studied factors in patients treated by robotic radical prostatectomy are PSA and pathological features of the biopsy and prostatectomy specimen. Studies on the factors associated with the surgical technique are scarce and with controversial results. The objective is to identify all possible surgical factors and their relationship with disease-free and metastasis-free survival. Patients and Method Prospective study approved by the Ethics Committee, including patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy since January 2009 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Surgeon, surgical time, blood loss, fascial access, continence techniques, preservation of the fascia, neurovascular bundles, bladder neck, urethra, learning curve and surgical complications, were analyzed as possible prognostic factors. We performed univariate and matched comparisons of survival using Kaplan-Meier estimation and long-rank tests. The significance level for multiple comparisons was established with False Discovery Rate-adjustment (adjusted p). Results Cohort of 667 patients with a median follow-up of 69 months. In univariate analysis, surgeon (adjp = 0.018), preservation of puboprostatic ligaments (adjp = 0.02), preservation of endopelvic fascia (adjp = 0.001) and performing periurethral suspension (adjp < 0.001) are poor prognostic factors for disease-free survival. Fascia preservation also negatively affects metastasis-free survival (adjp = 0.04). Previous abdominal surgeries, prostate, surgical time, blood loss, type of residual urethra, middle lobe, fascial access, fascia or bladder neck preservation, have no statistical significance. Conclusions The surgeon and specific aspects of the surgical technique are determining factors in disease-free survival. Preservation of the fascia is the only factor that negatively affects metastasis-free survival (AU)

Identifying prognostic parameters related to surgical technique in patients treated by robotic radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The most frequently studied factors in patients treated by robotic radical prostatectomy are PSA and pathological features of the biopsy and prostatectomy specimen. Studies on the factors associated with the surgical technique are scarce and with controversial results. The objective is to identify all possible surgical factors and their relationship with disease-free and metastasis-free survival. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective study approved by the Ethics Committee, including patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy since January 2009 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Surgeon, surgical time, blood loss, fascial access, continence techniques, preservation of the fascia, neurovascular bundles, bladder neck, urethra, learning curve and surgical complications, were analyzed as possible prognostic factors. We performed univariate and matched comparisons of survival using Kaplan-Meier estimation and long-rank tests. The significance level for multiple comparisons was established with False Discovery Rate-adjustment (adjusted p). RESULTS: Cohort of 667 patients with a median follow-up of 69 months. In univariate analysis, surgeon (adjp=0.018), preservation of puboprostatic ligaments (adjp=0.02), preservation of endopelvic fascia (adjp=0.001) and performing periurethral suspension (adjp<0.001) are poor prognostic factors for disease-free survival. Fascia preservation also negatively affects metastasis-free survival (adjp=0.04). Previous abdominal surgeries, prostate, surgical time, blood loss, type of residual urethra, middle lobe, fascial access, fascia or bladder neck preservation, have no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon and specific aspects of the surgical technique are determining factors in disease-free survival. Preservation of the fascia is the only factor that negatively affects metastasis-free survival.

Open retropubic radical prostatectomy: Still a well-established surgical technique for prostate cancer management.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical treatment options for prostate cancer have changed rapidly, given the expansion of robotics. However, open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) will continue to be performed in areas with financial limitations or with limited access to robotics. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term oncological outcomes, to categorize complication rates and to examine the early continence rates in patients treated with ORP. METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent ORP at our institution between 2000 and 2020. A standardized pad test was used to determine the early continence rates upon catheter removal, the late continence around a year after surgery was determined by the number of pads per day. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to report the complication rates. The biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival and overall survival (OS) rates were defined using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariable Cox-regression models were used to test the effect of different factors on biochemical recurrence. RESULTS: We analyzed 1095 patients. The median follow-up was 93.4 months. An overall 10-year BCR-free survival and OS of 73% and 82% respectively was found. A complication rate for Clavien Dindo≥3 was seen in 4.8% of patients. The early continence rate was 81.4% and the late continence 89,1%. Preoperative PSA level, Gleason score sum, pT stage, lymph node status, and surgical margin status were independent predictors of BCR (p<0.001, 95% CI). Limitations include retrospective and single center study design. CONCLUSIONS: ORP is a surgical procedure that provides excellent oncological- and early continence-rates.

Cytoreductive surgery in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer. Systematic review of the scientific literature.

INTRODUCTION: Interest in oligometastatic prostate cancer has spiked due to the emergence of new evidence regarding more specific and accurate imaging, and the wider use of minimally invasive techniques. Nevertheless, the optimal management of this pathology is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: Assess the efficacy and safety of cytoreductive surgery in patients suffering from oligometastatic prostate cancer. EVIDENCE GATHERING: Systematic review of the scientific literature (01/01/2010-31/12/2021) within the MedLine, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, Scopus, Spanish Healthcare Technology Assessment Agencies (AETS, Agencias de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias) and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. The keywords used were prostatectomy, prostatic neoplasm, radical prostatectomy; the free search terms were prostatectomy and oligometastatic prostate. The inclusion criteria comprised studies on patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer who had been operated on using radical cytoreductive prostatectomy. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The systematic review included 4 observational studies, 2 clinical trials, and 2 case series, of moderate quality. The results observed suggest that oligometastatic prostate cancer patients who had undergone cytoreductive prostate surgery obtained a benefit in terms of efficacy. Conversely, the majority of these studies showed a reduction in the number of localized complications, when compared to the best systemic treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Cytoreductive surgery in this group of patients is a safe procedure that reduces the incidence of localized complications and that presents promising results with regard to survival rates. To date, the lack of prospective trials limits the use of this therapeutic option to experimental environments.

Estudio poblacional de casuística y morbimortalidad de la prostatectomía radical en España / Population based study of morbidity and mortality rates associated to radical prostatectomy cases in Spain

Introducción: No existe ningún estudio poblacional que contabilice en número de prostatectomías radicales (PR) realizadas España, ni la morbimortalidad de dicha intervención.Nuestro objetivo es estudiar la morbimortalidad de la PR en España desde el 2011 al 2015 y evaluar la variabilidad geográfica. Material y métodos: Diseñamos un estudio observacional retrospectivo de todos los pacientes intervenidos de PR en España durante cinco años consecutivos (2011-2015) a partir de los datos registrados en el Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos (CMBD).Hemos estudiado la distribución del número de casos y la variabilidad intercomunitaria en términos de morbilidad y de estancia hospitalaria, así como el impacto del volumen quirúrgico medio anual por cada centro en dichas variables. Resultados: Entre los años 2011-2015 se han realizado un total de 37.725 PR en 221 hospitales españoles públicos del sistema nacional de salud. La edad media de la serie fue 63,9 ± 3,23 años. El 50% de las PR se han realizado por vía abierta, y un 43,4% se han intervenido en hospitales de < 500 camas. Encontramos una gran variabilidad en la distribución de los casos intervenidos en las distintas Comunidades Autónomas (CCAA Las comunidades que realizan un mayor número de prostatectomías son Andalucía, Cataluña, Galicia y Madrid. La tasa de complicaciones a nivel nacional es de 8,6%, siendo las más frecuentes la hemorragia y necesidad de transfusión (5,3 y 4%, respectivamente). Encontramos importantes diferencias en las tasas de hemorragia y en la estancia hospitalaria entre las distintas CCAA, que se mantienen tras ajustar por las características del paciente y del tipo de hospital. Al estudiar el volumen quirúrgico anual de cada hospital vemos que el impacto en la tasa de hemorragia o transfusión es lineal sin embargo en la estancia a partir de 60 PR/año la estancia se mantiene estable en torno a cinco días. (AU)

Introduction: There is no population-based study that accounts for the number of radical prostatectomies (RP) carried out in Spain, nor regarding the morbidity and mortality of this intervention.Our objective is to study the morbidity and mortality of RP in Spain from 2011 to 2015 and to evaluate the geographic variation. Material and methods: We designed a retrospective observational study of all patients submitted to RP in Spain during five consecutive years (2011-2015). The data was extracted from the «Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos» (CMBD).We have evaluated geographic variations in terms of morbidity and hospital stay, and the impact of the mean annual surgical volume for each center on these variables. Results: Between 2011-2015, a total of 37,725 RPs were performed in 221 Spanish public hospitals. The mean age of the series was 63.9 ± 3.23 years. Of all RPs, 50% were performed through an open approach, and 43.4% have been operated on in hospitals with < 500 beds. We observed an important variability in the distribution of the cases operated on in the different regions. The regions that perform more RPs are Andalusia, Catalonia, Galicia, and Madrid. Our study shows a complication rate of 8.6%, with hemorrhage and the need for transfusion being the most frequent (5.3 and 4%, respectively). There are significant differences in bleeding rates and hospital stay among regions, which are maintained after adjusting for patient characteristics and type of hospital. When studying the annual surgical volume of each hospital, we find that the impact on the rate of hemorrhage or transfusion is linear; however, hospital stay remains stable at around 5 days from 60 RPs/year (AU)

Impacto de la patología psiquiátrica en el pronóstico y supervivencia de los varones con cáncer de próstata tratados mediante prostatectomía radical / The impact of psychiatric pathology on the prognosis and survival of men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy

Introducción y objetivo: La ansiedad específica del cáncer (CSA) es la reacción psicológica más frecuente tras la prostatectomía radical (PR). Evaluamos la prevalencia de la patología psiquiátrica pretratamiento de cáncer de próstata mediante PR e identificamos la influencia de los diagnósticos psiquiátricos en la supervivencia y pronóstico en los pacientes. Material y métodos Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico observacional, 1.078 varones intervenidos mediante PR por cáncer de próstata órgano-confinado. Grupos: GP: pacientes con patología psiquiátrica previa a la PR; GNP: pacientes sin patología psiquiátrica previa a la PR, variables urológicas, oncológicas y psiquiátricas, estadística descriptiva y análisis multivariante. Resultados El 37,94% presentó algún diagnóstico psiquiátrico. Fue necesario tratamiento adyuvante de radioterapia (RT) en 27,83% y hormonoterapia (HT) en 23,38%; más frecuentes en GP. La supervivencia cáncer-específica fue superior en GNP. La ansiedad, depresión, insomnio, tabaquismo, psicosis y alcoholismo fueron los más frecuentes. La baja estadificación Tumor-Ganglios-Metástasis (TNM) y poca presencia de síntomas del tracto urinario inferior (STUI) e incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo (IUE) incrementó la probabilidad de ausencia de patología psiquiátrica. En GP aumentó la fatiga, disfunción eréctil y deterioro cognitivo tras la PR junto con RT y/o HT. A mayor edad y mayor antígeno prostático específico (PSA) al diagnóstico, aumentó el riesgo relativo de patología psiquiátrica y peor evolución. Los factores más relacionados fueron la PR, PSA, la edad y el tiempo de supervivencia. Conclusiones La patología psiquiátrica está presente en pacientes tratados mediante PR debido a cáncer de próstata, teniendo alto impacto en los resultados de supervivencia y pronóstico (AU)

Introduction and Objective: Cancer-specific anxiety is the most frequently reported psychological response after radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated the prevalence of pretreatment psychiatric pathology in patients with prostate cancer undergoing RP and identified the effects of psychiatric diagnoses on their survival and prognosis. Material and Methods Retrospective multicenter observational study including 1078 men treated with RP for organ-confined prostate cancer. Groups: GP: patients with psychiatric pathology prior to RP; GNP: patients without psychiatric pathology prior to RP. Urological, oncological and psychiatric variables, descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis were included. Results 37.94% of patients presented a psychiatric diagnosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy was required in 27.83% and hormone therapy in 23.38%; being more frequent in GP. Cancer-specific survival was higher in GNP. Anxiety, depression, insomnia, smoking, psychosis and alcoholism were the most frequent. Low TNM and low presence of LUTS and SUI increased the probability of absence of psychiatric pathology. Fatigue, erectile dysfunction and cognitive impairment after RP with RT and/or HT were higher in GP. Older age and higher PSA at diagnosis increased the relative risk of psychiatric pathology and worse outcome. The most frequently related factors were RP, PSA, age and survival time. Conclusions Psychiatric pathology is present in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, with a high impact on survival and prognostic outcomes (AU)

Population based study of morbidity and mortality rates associated to radical prostatectomy cases in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: There is no population-based study that accounts for the number of radical prostatectomies (RP) carried out in Spain, nor regarding the morbidity and mortality of this intervention. Our objective is to study the morbidity and mortality of RP in Spain from 2011 to 2015 and to evaluate the geographic variation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We designed a retrospective observational study of all patients submitted to RP in Spain during five consecutive years (2011-2015). The data was extracted from the «Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos¼ (CMBD). We have evaluated geographic variations in terms of morbidity and hospital stay, and the impact of the mean annual surgical volume for each center on these variables. RESULTS: Between 2011-2015, a total of 37,725 RPs were performed in 221 Spanish public hospitals. The mean age of the series was 63.9±3.23 years. Of all RPs, 50% were performed through an open approach, and 43.4% have been operated on in hospitals with <500 beds. We observed an important variability in the distribution of the cases operated on in the different regions. The regions that perform more RPs are Andalusia, Catalonia, Galicia, and Madrid. Our study shows a complication rate of 8.6%, with hemorrhage and the need for transfusion being the most frequent (5.3 and 4%, respectively). There are significant differences in bleeding rates and hospital stay among regions, which are maintained after adjusting for patient characteristics and type of hospital. When studying the annual surgical volume of each hospital, we find that the impact on the rate of hemorrhage or transfusion is linear; however, hospital stay remains stable at around 5 days from 60 RPs/year. CONCLUSIONS: In national terms, morbidity and mortality rates after RP are comparable to those described in the literature. This study reveals a clear dispersion in the hospitals that carry out this intervention, showing clear differences in terms of morbidity and hospital stay between the different regions.

The impact of psychiatric pathology on the prognosis and survival of men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Cancer-specific anxiety is the most frequently reported psychological response after radical prostatectomy (RP). We evaluated the prevalence of pretreatment psychiatric pathology in patients with prostate cancer undergoing RP and identified the effects of psychiatric diagnoses on their survival and prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective multicenter observational study including 1078 men treated with RP for organ-confined prostate cancer. Groups: GP: patients with psychiatric pathology prior to RP; GNP: patients without psychiatric pathology prior to RP. Urological, oncological and psychiatric variables, descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis were included. RESULTS: 37.94% of patients presented a psychiatric diagnosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy was required in 27.83% and hormone therapy in 23.38%; being more frequent in GP. Cancer-specific survival was higher in GNP. Anxiety, depression, insomnia, smoking, psychosis and alcoholism were the most frequent. Low TNM and low presence of LUTS and SUI increased the probability of absence of psychiatric pathology. Fatigue, erectile dysfunction and cognitive impairment after RP with RT and/or HT were higher in GP. Older age and higher PSA at diagnosis increased the relative risk of psychiatric pathology and worse outcome. The most frequently related factors were RP, PSA, age and survival time. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric pathology is present in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, with a high impact on survival and prognostic outcomes.

El papel de la resonancia magnética multiparamétrica en el diagnóstico de la recidiva local tras la prostatectomía radical y antes de la radioterapia de rescate / The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy and before salvage radiotherapy

Objetivo Evaluar la precisión diagnóstica de la resonancia magnética multiparamétrica (RMmp) en la detección de la recidiva local del cáncer de próstata (CaP) después de la prostatectomía radical (PR) y antes de la radioterapia (RT). Materiales y métodos Un total de 188 pacientes se sometieron a una RMmp de 1,5T después de la PR y antes de la RT. Los pacientes se dividieron en 2 grupos: con recidiva bioquímica (grupo A) y sin recidiva bioquímica, pero con alto riesgo de recidiva local (grupo B). Las variables continuas se compararon entre los 2 grupos mediante la prueba t de Student; las variables categóricas se analizaron mediante chi-cuadrado de Pearson. El análisis ROC se realizó considerando como variables de agrupación el PSA antes de la RT, el grado ISUP, el pT y el pN. Resultados La recidiva del CaP (reducción de los niveles de PSA después de la RT) fue del 89,8% en el grupo A y del 80,3% en el grupo B. Al comparar los pacientes con y sin recidiva del CaP, hubo una diferencia significativa en los valores de PSA antes de la RT para el grupo A, y en los valores de PSA antes y después de la RT para el grupo B. En el grupo A hubo una correlación significativa entre el PSA antes de la RT y el diámetro de la recidiva, y entre el PSA antes de la RT y el tiempo transcurrido hasta la recidiva. La precisión diagnóstica de la RMmp en la detección de la recidiva local del CaP tras la RT es del 62,2% en el grupo A y del 38% en el grupo B. La imagen potenciada en difusión es la secuencia de RM más específica y la perfusión dinámica con contraste la más sensible. Para el PSA=0,5ng/ml, el AUC disminuye, mientras que la sensibilidad y la precisión aumentan para cada secuencia de RM. Para el PSA=0,9ng/ml, el AUC de la perfusión dinámica con contraste aumenta significativamente (AU)

Purpose Assess multiparametric-MRI (mp-MRI) diagnostic accuracy in the detection of local recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (PR) and before radiation therapy (RT). Materials and methods A total of 188 patients underwent 1.5-T mp-MRI after RP before RT. Patients were divided into 2 groups: with biochemical recurrence (group A) and without but with high risk of local recurrence (group B). Continuous variables were compared between 2 groups using Student-t test; categoric variables were analyzed using Pearson chi-square. ROC analysis was performed considering PSA before RT, ISUP, pT and pN as grouping variables. Results PCa recurrence (reduction of PSA levels after RT) was 89.8% in group A and 80.3% in group B. Comparing patients with and without PCa recurrence, there was a significant difference in PSA values before RT for group A and for PSA values before RT and after RT for group B. In group A, there was a significant correlation between PSA before RT and diameter of recurrence and between PSA before RT and time spent before recurrence. The mp-MRI diagnostic accuracy in detecting PCa local recurrence after RP is of 62.2% in group A and 38% in group B. Diffusion weighted imaging is the most specific MRI-sequence and dynamic contrast enhanced the most sensitive. For PSA=0.5ng/ml, the AUC decreases while sensitivity and accuracy increase for each MRI-sequence. For PSA=0.9ng/ml, dynamic contrast enhanced-AUC increases significantly. Conclusion mp-MRI should always be performed before RT when a recurrence is suspected. New scenarios can be opened considering the role of diffusion weighted imaging for PSA≤0.5ng/ml (AU)

Impacto de la prostatectomía radical en los resultados urodinámicos de pacientes con cáncer de próstata tratados con radioterapia de intensidad modulada / Impact of a radical prostatectomy on the urodynamic results of prostate cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy

Introducción y objetivos Evaluar el efecto de la prostatectomía radical y la edad en los resultados urodinámicos antes y después de la radioterapia de intensidad modulada administrada a pacientes con cáncer de próstata. Materiales y métodos La muestra incluyó a 40 pacientes con cáncer de próstata, 22 de los cuales habían sido sometidos a prostatectomía radical. Se midieron y compararon los parámetros urodinámicos antes y después de una media de 4,2 meses de radioterapia. La radioterapia externa se administró mediante técnicas de terapia de arco volumétrico modulado y de radioterapia de intensidad modulada. Resultados No se vieron cambios significativos en los parámetros de uroflujometría. En el caso de la cistomanometría los datos no mostraron un aumento de la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo secundaria, pero sí un incremento del 7% en la incontinencia urinaria de urgencia. Hubo cambios estadísticamente significativos en la reducción de la capacidad vesical, con un deseo miccional fuerte, con urgencia miccional y también en la presión del detrusor con un deseo miccional normal. Además, el estudio de presión/flujo reveló una reducción estadísticamente significativa del volumen de orina residual. Conclusiones El efecto de la prostatectomía y la edad varía según la evolución del estudio urodinámico. Hubo una reducción significativa del volumen de orina residual, así como de la presión del detrusor, con un deseo miccional normal en los pacientes sin prostatectomía y en aquellos menores de 75 años. Además de un aumento en la incontinencia de urgencia, también se produjo un empeoramiento significativo del resultado urodinámico de llenado vesical y una disminución de la capacidad vesical cistomanométrica, con un deseo miccional fuerte y urgencia miccional. Ninguno de estos factores se vio afectado por la edad o la prostatectomía (AU)

Introduction and objectives To evaluate the effect of radical prostatectomy and age on urodynamics before and after intensity-modulated radiation therapy administered to prostate cancer patients. Materials and methods The sample consisted of 40 prostate cancer patients, 22 of whom had undergone a radical prostatectomy. Urodynamic parameters before and after an average of 4.2 months of radiotherapy were measured and compared. External radiotherapy was administered via Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) techniques. Results Uroflowmetry presented no significant parameters. In the case of Cystomanometry, the data did not show an increase in secondary stress urinary incontinence, although there is 7 percent increase in urge urinary incontinence. There were statistically significant changes in reduced bladder capacity with a strong desire to void, with an urge to void and also in the detrusor pressure with a normal desire to void. Furthermore, pressure/flow analysis revealed a statistically significant reduction of residual urine volume. Conclusions The effect of prostatectomy and age varies according to the evolution of urodynamics. There was a significant reduction in terms of residual urine volume and detrusor pressure with a normal desire to void in patients without a prostatectomy and in those under 75 years old. In addition to an increase in urge incontinence, there was also a significant worsening of the bladder filling urodynamics and a decrease in the cystomanometric bladder capacity with a strong desire and an urge to void. None of these were modified by age or prostatectomy (AU)

Oncological and functional results after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Pentafecta is currently the standard in the comprehensive evaluation of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, the objective of this study is the evaluation of oncological and functional outcomes in patients with prostate cancer of high risk undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. METHOD: Descriptive, retrospective study of 20 cases with a diagnosis of high-risk prostate cancer. The high-risk group is composed of a prostate-specific antigen equal or greater than 20 ng/mL, Gleason score equal or greater than 8, or clinical stages T2/T3 treated with robotic approach. RESULTS: Biochemical control was achieved from the first six weeks after the surgical event. 75% (n = 15) had negative surgical margins. 100% of the patients (n = 20) presented urinary continence immediately after removal of the urinary catheter. Erectile function was preserved at 3, 6 and 12 months in 100% of the patients who underwent neuropreservation but with use of an PDE inhibitor. (n = 5). Complications were reported in 10% (Clavien-Dindo I-II). CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer is considered an appropriate treatment option in selected patients. A different experimental design is needed to define the advantages or disadvantages of this approach, as well as to determine its role and application in clinical practice.

ANTECEDENTES: Pentafecta es el estándar en la evaluación integral de los pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía radical. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar y describir los desenlaces oncológicos y funcionales en pacientes con cáncer de próstata de alto riesgo sometidos a prostatectomía radical asistida por robot. MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, de 20 pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer de próstata de alto riesgo. El grupo de alto riesgo se compone por pacientes con antígeno prostático específico mayo o igual a 20 ng/ml, reporte histopatológico con Gleason mayor o igual a 8 y/o estadios clínicos T2/T3 tratados con abordaje robótico. RESULTADOS: El control bioquímico se alcanzó a partir de las primeras 6 semanas posterior al evento quirúrgico. El 75% (n = 15) presentaron márgenes quirúrgicos negativos. El 100% de los pacientes (n = 20) presentaron continencia urinaria inmediatamente después del retiro de la sonda vesical. La función eréctil se conservó a 3, 6 y 12 meses en el 100% de los pacientes a los que se realizó neuropreservación, pero con uso de inhibidor de la fosfodiesterasa (n = 5). Se reportaron complicaciones en el 10% de los casos (Clavien-Dindo I-II). CONCLUSIONES: La prostatectomía radical asistida por robot en pacientes con cáncer de próstata de alto riesgo se considera una opción de tratamiento adecuada en casos seleccionados. Se necesita un diseño experimental distinto para definir las ventajas o desventajas de este abordaje, así como determinar su papel y aplicación en la práctica clínica.

Evanescent Prostate Carcinoma, Case Report

Objective: To report the treatment and clinical monitoring in patients with prostatic evanescent carcinoma at Hospital Carlos Andrade Marin. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 148 patients undergoing by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Carlos Andrade Marin hospital. The cases reported between January 2016 to December 2018. The diagnosis was carried by taking a transrectal prostate biopsy with 12 cylinders. This samples are studied by the pathologist who reviews the radical prostatectomy surgery. Results: Three patients had prostatic evanescent carcinoma, which those cases showed Gleason 6 (3+3) prostate cancer. Two received neoadjuvant hormone therapy and the other patient presented minor tumor invasion in 1 out of 12 cylinders used during the biopsy. In the three cases, after the sample analysis, there was no residual tumor evidence. Therefore, they were classified as pT10. Conclusions: In this study, the results obtained from the patients studied presents the incidence of prostatic evanescent carcinoma is 2%. The combination of these different factors such as clinical status, preoperative PSA, number of positive cylinders and the invasion percentage, additionally to the usage of neoadjuvant hormone therapy prior the radical prostatectomy can help to predict evanescent carcinoma of the prostate (AU)

Objetivos: Reportar la experiencia del Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín en el tratamiento y seguimiento de pacientes con cáncer de próstata evanescente.Materiales y Métodos: Se ha estudiado las historiasclínicas de 148 pacientes que se realizaron prostatectomíaradical asistida por robot en el Hospital Carlos AndradeMarín en el periodo enero 2016 hasta diciembre 2018, eldiagnostico se realiza mediante toma de biopsia prostáticatransrectal con toma de 12 cilindros, los cuales son estudiados por el mismo medico patólogo que revisa la piezaquirúrgica de prostatectomía radical.Resultados: Se identifican tres casos de carcinomade próstata evanescente, los cuales presentan carcinoma depróstata Gleason 6 (3+3), dos reciben terapia neoadyuvantehormonal y uno presenta escasa invasión tumoral en 1/12cilindros de biopsia prostática (cáncer de próstata diminuto). En los tres casos después del análisis de las piezasquirúrgicas no se evidencia tumor residual por lo que se loscataloga como pT0.Conclusiones: En nuestra experiencia la incidenciade carcinoma de próstata evanescente es del 2% en elgrupo de pacientes estudiados. La combinación del estadio clínico, PSA preoperatorio, numero de cilindros positivos y el porcentaje de invasión de los mismos como el usode neoadyuvancia previo a la prostatectomía radical puedeayudar a predecir el fenómeno de carcinoma de próstata evanescente (AU)

The role of multiparametric mri in the diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy and before salvage radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Assess multiparametric-MRI (mp-MRI) diagnostic accuracy in the detection of local recurrence of Prostate Cancer (PCa) after Radical Prostatectomy (PR) and before Radiation Therapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 188 patients underwent 1.5-T mp-MRI after RP before RT. Patients were divided into two groups: with biochemical recurrence (group A) and without but with high risk of local recurrence (group B). Continuous variables were compared between two groups using T-Student; categoric variables were analyzed using Pearson chi-square. ROC analysis was performed considering PSA before RT, ISUP, pT and pN as grouping variables. RESULTS: PCa recurrence (reduction of PSA levels after RT) was 89.8% in the group A and 80.3% in the group B. Comparing patients with and without PCa recurrence, there was a significant difference in PSA values before RT for group A and for PSA values before RT and after RT for group B. In group A, there was a significant correlation between PSA before RT and diameter of recurrence and between PSA before RT and time spent before recurrence. The mp-MRI diagnostic accuracy in detecting PCa local recurrence after RP is of 62.2% in group A and 38% in group B. DWI is the most specific MRI-sequence and DCE the most sensitive. For PSA = 0.5 ng/ml, the AUC decreases while sensitivity and accuracy increase for each MRI-sequence. For PSA = 0.9 ng/ml, DCE-AUC increases significantly. CONCLUSION: mp-MRI should always be performed before RT when a recurrence is suspected. New scenarios can be opened considering the role of DWI for PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/ml.