Risk factors of proximal junctional failure after adult spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify surgical, patient-specific, and radiographic risk factors for Proximal Junctional Failure (PJF), a complex complication following adult spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The literature on the risk factors for proximal junctional failure after adult spinal deformity surgery was included. The study patients were diagnosed with adult spinal deformity and underwent surgery for adult spinal deformity. Proximal junctional failure (PJF) is defined as the occurrence of Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), accompanied by one or more of the following characteristics: a fracture of the vertebral body at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1 level, disruption of the posterior ligaments, or dislodgement of the instrumentation at the UIV. PJK, on the other hand, is determined by two criteria: a proximal junctional sagittal Cobb angle (1) of 10° and (2) at least 10° greater than the preoperative value. RESULTS: Our pooled analysis of 11 unique studies (2037 patients) revealed significant differences in several preoperative and postoperative measures between PJF and non-PJF groups. CONCLUSIONS: In ASD patients, the presence of concurrent osteoporosis or paravertebral muscle wasting significantly increases the risk of developing PJF. The use of bicortical screws, UIV screw angle exceeding 1°, and positioning the UIV in the lower thoracic or lumbar region also further elevate this risk. Lower preoperative SS, higher preoperative PI-LL, higher preoperative PT, higher preoperative SVA, higher postoperative LL, and a greater change in LL characterize patients with PJF.

What if You Could Treat the Same Patient Again, Would You do the Exact Same Spine Surgery? A Multi-Surgeon Survey of Their Own Revisions.

STUDY DESIGN: Case-based survey. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate what a group of surgeons learned from their own revisions, and what they would do differently today. METHODS: A multi-center database of ASD surgical patients was queried to identify those with at least 2 surgical procedures performed by the same surgeon between 2009 and 2019. A clinical vignette was created for each case including demographics, a timeline of events, radiographs/measurements, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and surgical strategies used for the index and revision surgeries. The operative surgeon was then asked to fill out a five-question survey aimed at determining factors that contribute to operative decision-making and planning. RESULTS: 86 patients were operated on by 6 participating surgeons for both index and revision ASD surgery. The revised patients had similar follow-up compared to the non-revised group (P = 0.73), with the most common complications indicating a need for revision surgery being proximal junctional failure (42%) and pseudoarthrosis (28%). Surgeons reported that they would not change their surgical strategy in 52.3% of the cases. The leading cause for revision was hardware/instrumentation issues (24.4%). Learning points included rod-related choice (23.3%), level selection (19.8), PJF prophylactic strategy (15.1%), and sagittal alignment objective (11.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons saw opportunity in nearly half of the cases to improve outcomes by changing something in the original surgery. While 40% of the failures remained unexplained from the surgeons' perspective, this study highlights the capacity for adopting changes in adult spinal deformity surgery and illuminates the reasoning behind certain surgical decisions.

Risk Factors for Recurrent Proximal Junctional Failure Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Analysis of 60 Patients Undergoing Fusion Extension Surgery for Proximal Junctional Failure.

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous studies identifying risk factors for proximal junctional failure (PJF), risk factors for recurrent PJF (R-PJF) are still not well established. Therefore, we aimed to identify the risk factors for R-PJF following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. METHODS: Among 479 patients who underwent ≥5-level fusion surgery for ASD, the focus was on those who experienced R-PJF at any time or did not experience R-PJF during a follow-up duration of ≥1 year. PJF was defined as a proximal junctional angle (PJA) ≥28° plus a difference in PJA ≥22° or performance of revision surgery regardless of PJA degree. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to R-PJF development: no R-PJF and R-PJF groups. Risk factors were evaluated focusing on patient, surgical, and radiographic factors at the index surgery as well as at the revision surgery. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients in the final study cohort, 24 (40%) experienced R-PJF. Significant risk factors included greater postoperative sagittal vertical axis (OR = 1.044), overcorrection relative to age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL; OR = 7.794) at the index surgery, a greater total sum of the proximal junctional kyphosis severity scale (OR = 1.145), and no use of the upper instrumented vertebra cement (OR = 5.494) at the revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We revealed that the greater postoperative sagittal vertical axis and overcorrection relative to age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis at the index surgery, a greater proximal junctional kyphosis severity scale score, and no use of upper instrumented vertebra cement at the revision surgery were significant risk factors for R-PJF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To reduce the risk of R-PJF after ASD surgery, avoiding under- and overcorrection during the initial surgery is recommended. Additionally, close assessment of the severity of PJF with timely intervention is crucial, and cement augmentation should be considered during revision surgery.

Instrumentation Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

In recent years, advances in the surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) have led to improved outcomes. Although these advances have helped drive the development of deformity surgery to meet the rising volume of patients seeking surgical treatment, many challenges have yet to be solved. Instrumentation failure remains one of the most common major complications following deformity surgery, associated with significant morbidity due to elevated re-operation rates among those experiencing mechanical complications. The two most frequently encountered subtypes of instrumentation failure are rod fracture (RF) and proximal junctional kyphosis/proximal junctional failure (PJK/PJF). While RF and PJK/PJF are both modes of instrumentation failure, they are two distinct entities with different clinical implications and treatment strategies. Considering that RF and PJK/PJF continue to represent a major challenge for patients with ASD and deformity surgeons alike, this review aims to discuss the incidence, risk factors, clinical impact, treatment strategies, preventive measures, and future research directions for each of these substantial complications.

Paraspinal Sarcopenia and Lower Hounsfield Units are Independent Predictors of Increased Risk for Proximal Junctional Complications Following Thoracolumbar Fusions Terminating in the Upper Thoracic Spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The impact of paraspinal sarcopenia following fusions that extend to the upper thoracic spine remain unknown. The purpose of the present study was to assess the impact of sarcopenia on the development of PJK and PJF following spine fusion surgery from the upper thoracic spine to the pelvis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent spine fusion surgery that extended caudally to the pelvis and terminated cranially between T1-6. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: (1) patients without PJK or PJF and (2) patients with PJK and/or PJF. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine risk factors for the development of proximal junctional complications. RESULTS: We identified 81 patients for inclusion in this study. Mean HU at the UIV was 186.1 ± 47.5 in the cohort of patients without PJK or PJF, which was substantially higher than values recorded in the PJK/PJF subgroup (142.4 ± 40.2) (P < 0.001). Severe multifidus sarcopenia was identified at a higher rate in the subgroup of patients who developed proximal junction pathology (66.7%) than in the subgroup of patients who developed neither PJK nor PJF (7.4%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated both low HU at the UIV and moderate-severe multifidus sarcopenia to be risk factors for the development of PJK and PJF. CONCLUSIONS: Severe paraspinal sarcopenia and diminished bone density at the UIV impart an increased risk of developing PJK and PJF in following thoracolumbar fusions from the upper thoracic spine to the pelvis.

Different characteristics between acute and delayed proximal junctional failure in elderly patients undergoing corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity: comparative analysis of risk factor, failure mode, and clinical consequences.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: While numerous studies have been conducted on proximal junctional failure (PJF), the clinical significance of acute and delayed PJF remains poorly understood. PURPOSE: The primary object of this study is to investigate the risk factors separately for acute and delayed PJF. Secondly, we aim to assess the incidence of each failure mode and their clinical consequences in relation to acute and delayed PJF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective comparative study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients aged ≥60 years who underwent deformity correction with ≥5-level fusion to sacrum. OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk factor, failure modes, and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). METHODS: Acute PJF is defined as PJF occurring within 6 months, while delayed PJF occurring after 6 months. Risk factors were analyzed by comparing various clinical and radiographic parameters among 3 groups: no, acute, and delayed PJF groups. The failure modes, including soft tissue failure, vertebral fracture, fixation failure, and myelopathy, were compared among these groups. The clinical subsequences after PJF development were evaluated by assessing the change in proximal junctional angle (PJA), revision rate, and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). RESULTS: A study cohort of 363 patients was included in the analysis. Among them, 156 patients experienced PJF, with 87 patients (55.8%) in the acute PJF group and 69 patients (44.2%) in the delayed PJF group. Multivariate analyses showed that older age (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.057, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.002-1.118), osteoporosis (OR=2.149, 95% CI = 1.074-4.300), high American Society of Anesthesiology ASA score (OR=2.150, 95% CI = 1.089-4.245), and overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis target (OR=4.031, 95% CI = 1.962-8.280) were identified as risk factors for the development of acute PJF. On the other hand, a high body mass index (OR=1.150, 95% CI = 1.049-1.251) and an uppermost instrumented vertebra located at ≤T10 (OR=2.267, 95% CI = 1.205-4.268) were found to be associated with delayed occurrence of PJF. No radiographic parameters were found to be related to the development of delayed PJF. In terms of failure modes, vertebral fracture and fixation failure were more commonly observed in acute PJF, while soft tissue failure and myelopathy were more predominant in delayed PJF. The clinical course was more aggressive in the acute PJF group compared to the delayed PJF group, as evidenced by a greater increase in PJA, a higher revision rate, and worse PROM. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated different risk factors between the acute and delayed PJF. It was found that overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted PI-LL target increased the risk of acute PJF, but had no impact on the development of delayed PJF. Therefore, a different surgical strategy needs to be established to mitigate both acute and delayed PJF.

Osteoporosis Treatment and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the prevalence and treatment of osteoporosis in patients undergoing long spinal fusion for adult spinal deformity (ASD) and compare the impact of osteoporosis treatment on surgical and radiographic outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients aged ≥40 years who underwent thoracolumbar ASD surgery at a single academic center between 2015 and 2021. We recorded demographic information, procedural details, and pharmacologic treatments. Primary outcomes included preoperative and postoperative sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, and postoperative complications such as surgical site infection, pseudarthrosis, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), and proximal junctional failure. Patients with osteoporosis were compared to those without. RESULTS: Among 168 patients, the prevalence of osteoporosis was 28.6%. Osteoporotic patients were older and predominantly female. At the time of surgery, 70.8% of osteoporotic patients were receiving pharmacologic treatment. Preoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch and sagittal vertical axis did not differ significantly between osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic cohorts. Both cohorts showed similar postoperative improvements. The osteoporotic cohort had a higher rate of PJK (35.4% vs. 17.5%, p=0.01), but no significant difference in proximal junctional failure rates. No significant differences were found between monotherapy and combination therapy outcomes for osteoporotic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporotic patients undergoing ASD surgery exhibited similar surgical outcomes and alignment improvements compared to nonosteoporotic patients, despite a higher rate of PJK. Pharmacological treatment appears beneficial in managing osteoporosis-related surgical risks. These findings highlight the importance of identifying and treating osteoporosis in ASD patients to minimize complications.

Can We Rely on Prophylactic Two-Level Vertebral Cement Augmentation in Long-Segment Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery to Reduce the Incidence of Proximal Junctional Complications?

Background and Objectives: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF), the most prevalent complications following long-segment thoracolumbar fusions for adult spinal deformity (ASD), remain lacking in defined preventive measures. We studied whether one of the previously reported strategies with successful results-a prophylactic augmentation of the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) and supra-adjacent vertebra to the UIV (UIV + 1) with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-could also serve as a preventive measure of PJK/PJF in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Materials and Methods: The study included 29 ASD patients who underwent a combination of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-LLIF) at L1-2 through L4-5, all-pedicle-screw instrumentation from the lower thoracic spine to the sacrum, S2-alar-iliac fixation, and two-level balloon-assisted PMMA vertebroplasty at the UIV and UIV + 1. Results: With a minimum 3-year follow-up, non-PJK/PJF group accounted for fifteen patients (52%), PJK for eight patients (28%), and PJF requiring surgical revision for six patients (21%). We had a total of seven patients with proximal junctional fracture, even though no patients showed implant/bone interface failure with screw pullout, probably through the effect of PMMA. In contrast to the PJK cohort, six PJF patients all had varying degrees of neurologic deficits from modified Frankel grade C to D3, which recovered to grades D3 and to grade D2 in three patients each, after a revision operation of proximal extension of instrumented fusion with or without neural decompression. None of the possible demographic and radiologic risk factors showed statistical differences between the non-PJK/PJF, PJK, and PJF groups. Conclusions: Compared with the traditional open surgical approach used in the previous studies with a positive result for the prophylactic two-level cement augmentation, the MIS procedures with substantial benefits to patients in terms of less access-related morbidity and less blood loss also provide a greater segmental stability, which, however, may have a negative effect on the development of PJK/PJF.

Revision Strategy for Proximal Junctional Failure: Combined Effect of Proximal Extension and Focal Correction.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospectively-collected multicenter database. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine optimal strategies in terms of focal angular correction and length of proximal extension during revision for PJF. METHODS: 134 patients requiring proximal extension for PJF were analyzed in this study. The correlation between amount of proximal junctional angle (PJA) reduction and recurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and/or PJF was investigated. Following stratification by the degree of PJK correction and the numbers of levels extended proximally, rates of radiographic PJK (PJA >28° & ΔPJA >22°), and recurrent surgery for PJF were reported. RESULTS: Before revision, mean PJA was 27.6° ± 14.6°. Mean number of levels extended was 6.0 ± 3.3. Average PJA reduction was 18.8° ± 18.9°. A correlation between the degree of PJA reduction and rate of recurrent PJK was observed (r = -.222). Recurrent radiographic PJK (0%) and clinical PJF (4.5%) were rare in patients undergoing extension ≥8 levels, regardless of angular correction. Patients with small reductions (<5°) and small extensions (<4 levels) experienced moderate rates of recurrent PJK (19.1%) and PJF (9.5%). Patients with large reductions (>30°) and extensions <8 levels had the highest rate of recurrent PJK (31.8%) and PJF (16.0%). CONCLUSION: While the degree of focal PJK correction must be determined by the treating surgeon based upon clinical goals, recurrent PJK may be minimized by limiting reduction to <30°. If larger PJA correction is required, more extensive proximal fusion constructs may mitigate recurrent PJK/PJF rates.

Surgical technique: proximal extension of instrumentation using sublaminar bands for salvage of postoperative proximal junctional failure in pediatric patients.

PURPOSE: Proximal junctional failure is a complication that can occur following posterior spine surgery with instrumentation. The ability to surgically revise this complication is important for the spine surgeon, yet there is little literature on the topic, especially for pediatric patients. METHODS: The technique we describe involves proximal extension of the existing instrumentation using paired levels of sublaminar bands that allows for a smooth transition of forces at the junction of instrumented and non-instrumented regions of the spine. RESULTS: The results of this technique have been promising with a case series demonstrating improved radiographic and clinical outcomes for eight children at a minimum of 1 year follow-up. CONCLUSION: This a reliable, effective, and safe technique for salvage of PJF in children that uses posterior osteotomies and proximal extension of the instrumentation using sublaminar bands, resulting in gradual load sharing correction to restore sagittal balance.

Association between the upper instrumented vertebra screw angles and proximal junctional complications in patients with de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) screw angles on proximal junctional complications in patients with de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DNDLS). METHODS: A total of 120 patients with DNDLS who underwent posterior long-segment instrumentation and fusion were included. Patients were divided into a proximal junctional kyphosis/failure (PJK/PJF) group and a non-PJK/PJF group. Radiographic parameters were measured, including UIV screw angle, UIV slope, UIV screw slope, fixed segmental angle (FSA), and spinopelvic parameters. Clinical and radiographic data were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the independent risk factors of PJK/PJF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the threshold value to predict PJK/PJF. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (30.0%) developed PJK or PJF during follow-up. Patients in the PJK/PJF group had a larger postoperative UIV screw angle, a larger postoperative UIV screw slope, and a larger postoperative PJA. A significant increase was observed in UIV screw angle from immediately postoperative assessment to the final follow-up in two groups (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic analysis indicated that a larger positive postoperative UIV screw angle was an independent risk factor for PJK/PJF (OR 1.546, 95% CI 1.274-1.877). ROC curve analysis indicated that a UIV screw angle ≥ 1° is more likely to develop PJK/PJF. Compared with group A patients (UIV screw angle < 1°), group B patients (UIV screw angle ≥ 1°) had a higher incidence of PJK, PJF, UIV screw loosening, and worse functional scores at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Avoiding insertion of cranially directed UIV pedicle screws may help prevent the development of PJK and PJF in patients with DNDLS.

Pelvic Incidence as a Predictor of Proximal Junctional Failure in Patients Undergoing Anterior Column Realignment with Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Release to Restore Lordosis in Adult Spinal Deformity: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify variables that may contribute to the development of proximal junctional failure (PJF) in patients with long lumbo-sacral and thoraco-lumbo-pelvic constructs undergoing anterior column realignment (ACR) with anterior longitudinal ligament release (ALLR). METHODS: Data of patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent ACR with ALLR at L3-4 were collected retrospectively from medical records and a prospectively maintained spine research database between 2016 and 2022. RESULTS: Eleven (41%) developed PJF at a mean of 24 ± 21 months from the index surgery. The cohort was then divided into 2 groups for analysis, 13 subjects in the high pelvic incidence (PI) group (defined as PI ≥ 55°) and 14 subjects in the low PI group (defined as PI < 55°). Visual Analog Scale for back pain and Oswestry Disability Index decreased from 9.5 to 2.1 and 61 to 10 in the high PI group, and from 8.9 to 2.4 and 60.9 to 10.3 in the low PI group, respectively. PI (P = 0.004), sacral slope (P = 0.005), and postoperative PI-lumbar lordosis mismatch (P = 0.02) were found to be significant predictors of PJF. The receiver operator curve revealed a cutoff PI value ≤ 53° (95% confidence interval: 52°-64°), below which the risk of PJF becomes significantly higher in patients undergoing ACR with ALLR at L3-4. CONCLUSIONS: PI may be a predictor of PJF and highly correlates with ACR-ALLR levels. In patients undergoing L3-4 ACR-ALLR, a PI value of ≤53° is associated with a significantly elevated risk of PJF. Preoperative planning of ACR-ALLR level based on normal sagittal alignment in otherwise healthy individuals may mitigate the risk of PJF development in patients with adult spinal deformity treated with ACR-ALLR.

Sarcopenia in paraspinal muscle as a risk factor of proximal junctional kyphosis and proximal junctional failure after adult spinal deformity surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF), including paraspinal muscle atrophy. METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients who underwent a long-instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity (ASD) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included in the study. Patient, surgical, and radiological factors were evaluated. Muscle volume was measured using the muscle/vertebra ratio of the multifidus, erector spinae (ES), and psoas muscles, and muscle function was evaluated using the degree of fat infiltration at the L4-5 level. RESULTS: The study included 57 consecutive patients: 25 patients in the combined PJK/PJF group (13 with PJK and 12 with PJF) and 32 in the control group (without PJK or PJF). The mean time to onset of PJK and PJF was 15.7 and 1.7 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that greater pre- and postoperative sagittal vertical axis was associated with the occurrence of PJK/PJF. ES muscle atrophy was more significant in the PJK/PJF group than in the control group, and more severe in the PJF than in the PJK group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that PJF occurred much earlier than PJK after ASD surgery. Paraspinal muscle atrophy was identified as a significant risk factor for PJK and PJF, especially PJF. The possibility of PJK and PJF development should be considered when long-segment fusion is planned for patients with paraspinal muscle atrophy.

Tension Parameters of Junctional Tethers in Proximal Junction Kyphosis: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

OBJECTIVE: Proximal junctional failure following surgical correction for adult spinal deformity significantly impacts quality of life and increases the economic burden of treating underlying spinal deformity. The objective of this cadaver study was to determine optimal tension parameters in junctional tethers for proximal junctional kyphosis prevention. METHODS: Cadaveric specimens were used to establish the optimal tension range in polyethylene tethering devices, such as the VersaTie (NuVasive) used in this study. Three specimens were instrumented to test tether tensions of 0, 75, and 150 Newtons (N) at L1-L2, T9-T10, and T3-T4. An optical tracking system was used to measure when specimens reached proximal junctional kyphosis, experienced instrumentation or tissue failure, or reached a cap of 2500 cycles. Radiographs were obtained before and after testing. RESULTS: At all levels, use of a tether at tension forces of 75 N and 150 N elicited a protective effect. The only level in which a higher tension on the tether resulted in more protection was at T3-T4. When averaged, the use of a tether at tension forces of 75 N and 150 N showed 1000 cycles of protection at L1-L2, 2000 cycles at T9-T10, and 1426 cycles at T3-T4. Radiographic analysis corroborated these findings. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a tether in a cadaveric model prevents the development of proximal junctional kyphosis across all tested levels and an increased tension force of 150 N is protective at the proximal thoracic spine. These data can be used to develop further models for a tether system that reproducibly applies a fixed tension force above the thoracolumbar rod construct.

Proximal Junctional Failure after Corrective Surgery: Focusing on Elderly Patients with Severe Sagittal Imbalance.

Background: Previous reports with proximal junctional failure (PJF) included relatively young patients or deformity without sagittal imbalance. The present study focused on the two well-known risk factors for PJF, old age and severe sagittal imbalance. With these high-risk patients, the present study aimed to identify a strategy that could prevent PJF and to investigate whether the degree of correction would really affect the PJF occurrence. Methods: Patients who were ≥ 60 years of age and underwent long fusion (≥ 4) to the sacrum for severe sagittal imbalance (defined as pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] ≥ 30°) were included. PJF was defined as a vertebral fracture at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1, failure of UIV fixation, myelopathy, or any need for proximal extension of fusion. Presumed risk factors were compared between the patients with and without PJF. Results: Total 146 patients (mean age, 68.4 years) with preoperative mean PI-LL of 46.8° were included. PJF developed in 39 patients (26.7%) at a mean of 18.1 months after surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that osteoporosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.812; p = 0.019) and UIV located below T10 (OR, 3.773; p = 0.010) were significant risk factors for developing PJF. However, the degree of correction did not affect PJF occurrence. Conclusions: The present study indicates that osteoporosis should be well corrected preoperatively and extending the fusion above T10 should be considered for severe imbalance in old patients. However, the amount of correction was not associated with PJF development.

The influence of ligament biomechanics on proximal junctional kyphosis and failure in patients with adult spinal deformity.

Purpose: It is unknown whether the biomechanics of the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) are impaired in individuals undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). Characterizing these properties may improve our understanding of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK; defined as proximal junctional angle [PJA] of >10 deg from UIV-1 to UIV + 2), as well as proximal junctional failure (PJF; symptomatic PJK requiring revision). The purpose of this prospective observational study is to compare biomechanical properties of the PLC in individuals with ASD who do, and do not develop PJK or PJF within 1 year of spinal fusion surgery. Methods: Intraoperative biopsies of PLC were obtained from 32 consecutive patients undergoing spinal fusions for ASD (>4 levels). Ligament peak force, tensile stress, tensile strain, and elastic modulus (EM) were measured with a materials testing system. Biomechanical properties and tissue dimensions were correlated with age, gender, BMI, vitamin D level, osteoporosis, sagittal alignment, PJA and change in PJA preoperatively, within 3 months, and at 1 year postoperatively. Results: Longer ligaments were associated with greater PJA change at 3 months (p = 0.04), and thinner ligaments were associated with greater PJA change at 1 year (r = 0.57, p = 0.01). Greater EM was associated with greater PJA at both 3 months and 1 year (p = 0.03). Five participants had a change in PJA of >10 1 year postoperatively, and three participants demonstrated PJF. EM was significantly higher in individuals who required revision surgery (p = 0.003), and ligament length was greater (p = 0.03). Preoperative sagittal alignment was not related to incidence of revision surgery (p > 0.10). Conclusions: The biomechanical properties of the PLC may be associated with higher risk for proximal failure. Ligaments that are longer, thinner, and less elastic are associated with higher postoperative PJA. Furthermore stiffer EM of the ligament is associated with the need for revision surgery.

Proximal Junctional Kyphosis or Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery - Review of Risk Factors and Its Prevention.

Proximal junction kyphosis (PJK) is a common imaging finding after long-level fusion, and proximal junctional failure (PJF) is an aggravated form of the progressive disease spectrum of PJK. This includes vertebral fracture of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1, instability between UIV and UIV+1, neurological deterioration requiring surgery. Many studies have reported on PJK and PJF after long segment instrumentation for adult spinal deformity (ASD). In particular, for spine deformity surgeons, risk factors and prevention strategies of PJK and PJF are very important to minimize reoperation. Therefore, this review aims to help reduce the occurrence of PJK and PJF by updating the latest contents of PJK and PJF by 2023, focusing on the risk factors and prevention strategies of PJK and PJF. We conducted a search on multiple database for articles published until February 2023 using the search keywords "proximal junctional kyphosis," "proximal junctional failure," "proximal junctional disease," and "adult spinal deformity." Finally, 103 papers were included in this study. Numerous factors have been suggested as potential risks for the development of PJK and PJF, including a high body mass index, inadequate postoperative sagittal balance and overcorrection, advanced age, pelvic instrumentation, and osteoporosis. Recently, with the increasing elderly population, sarcopenia has been emphasized. The quality and quantity of muscle in the surgical site have been suggested as new risk factor. Therefore, spine surgeon should understand the pathophysiology of PJK and PJF, as well as individual risk factors, in order to develop appropriate prevention strategies for each patient.

Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: An In-depth Review.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery aims to correct abnormal spinal curvature in adults, leading to improved functionality and reduced pain. However, this surgery is associated with various complications, one of which is proximal junctional failure (PJF). PJF can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of its causes and the development of effective management strategies. This review aims to provide an in-depth understanding of PJF in ASD surgery. PJF is a complex complication resulting from a multitude of factors including patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and postoperative management. Age, osteoporosis, overcorrection of sagittal alignment, and poor bone quality are identified as significant risk factors. The clinical implications of PJF are substantial, often requiring revision surgery and causing a considerable decrease in patients' quality of life. Prevention strategies include careful preoperative planning, appropriate patient selection, and optimization of surgical techniques. Treatment often necessitates a multifaceted approach, including surgical intervention and the management of underlying risk factors. Predictive modeling is an emerging field that may offer a promising avenue for the risk stratification of patients and individualized preventive strategies. A thorough understanding of PJF's pathogenesis, risk factors, and clinical implications is essential for surgeons involved in ASD surgery. Current preventive measures and treatment strategies aim to mitigate the risk and manage the complications of PJF, but the complication cannot be entirely prevented. Future research should focus on the development of more effective preventive and treatment strategies, and predictive models could be valuable in this pursuit.

Use of Tethers for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Prophylaxis in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) often involves long-segment posterior instrumentation that introduces stress at the proximal junction that can result in proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) or proximal junctional failure (PJF). Recently, the use of tethers at the proximal junction has been proposed as a means of buffering the transitional stresses and reducing the risk of PJK/PJF. Our objectives are to summarize the clinical literature on proximal junctional tethers for PJK/PJF prophylaxis. METHODS: Articles published between 1 January 2000 and 10 November 2022 were identified via a PubMed search using combinations of the search terms "spine surgery," "ASD," "complication," "surgery," "PJK," "PJF," "tether," "sublaminar band," and "prophylaxis." No restrictions were placed on the number of patients, surgical indications, or surgical procedures. Relevant articles were reviewed and summarized. RESULTS: Fifteen articles were identified, including 2 prospective cohorts (Level II), 10 retrospective cohorts (Level III), and 3 retrospective case series (Level IV). All studies were published between 2016 and 2022, and all focused on ASD patient populations. The mean age in each study ranged from 55 to 69 years, and most studies had a mean follow-up of at least 12 months (range, 5.5-45.4 months). Eleven studies used a polyethylene tether, 2 used soft sublaminar cables, and 2 used semitendinous allograft. The tether extended to the UIV+1 or UIV+2, passing either through or around the spinous processes, in 13 studies. In the remaining 2 studies, the tether was passed sublaminar at the UIV+1. Fourteen studies favored the use of tethers with regard to reduction of PJK/PJF rates, and one demonstrated similar rates of PJK between the tether and no-tether groups. CONCLUSIONS: PJK/PJF remain major challenges in ASD surgery. Most early studies suggest that the use of tethers for ligamentous augmentation may help to mitigate the development of PJK/PJF. However, the multifactorial etiology of PJK/PJF makes it unlikely that any single technique will solve this complex problem. Further study is needed to address not only the effectiveness of junctional tethers but also to clarify whether there are optimal tether configurations, tether materials, and tether tension. LEVEL EVIDENCE: 3.

Junctional Failures at Both Ends After Long Fusion Arthrodesis Stopping at L5: Incidences and Risk Factors.

OBJECTIVE: Junctional failures after long fusion stopping at L5 can present at both proximal and distal ends. The purpose of this study was to investigate incidences and risk factors of proximal junctional failure (PJF) and distal junctional failure (DJF) after long lumbar instrumented fusion stopping at L5 for adult spinal deformity. METHODS: Sixty-three patients who underwent long fusion surgery stopping at L5 with a minimum follow-up of 3 years were reviewed retrospectively. PJF and DJF were defined as newly developed back pain and/or radiculopathy with corresponding radiographic failures. The incidence and risk factors of each junctional failure were analyzed using a log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Twelve men and 51 women were included in our study. Their mean age was 68.5 ± 7.0 years and the mean follow-up period was 84.5 ± 45.3 months. PJF and DJF occurred in 17 (27%) and 16 patients (25.4%), respectively. PJF and DJF developed at median durations of 32.1 months and 13.3 months, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two. Three patients presented with both PJF and DJF. Risk factors for PJF included lower body mass index, higher preoperative lumbar lordosis, and higher postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (hazard ratio, 0.570, 1.055, and 1.040, respectively). For DJF, higher preoperative SVA was an independent risk factor (hazard ratio, 1.010). CONCLUSIONS: After long fusion surgery stopping at L5, PJF and DJF occurred at similar rates. Lower body mass index, higher preoperative lumbar lordosis, and higher postoperative SVA were risk factors for PJF. Higher preoperative SVA was an independent risk factor for DJF.