Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 271
Filter
1.
RMD Open ; 10(2)2024 Jun 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886002

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To understand (1) what guidance exists to assess the methodological quality of qualitative research; (2) what methods exist to grade levels of evidence from qualitative research to inform recommendations within European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in multiple databases including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, COCHRANE and PsycINFO, from inception to 23 October 2020. Eligible studies included primary articles and guideline documents available in English, describing the: (1) development; (2) application of validated tools (eg, checklists); (3) guidance on assessing methodological quality of qualitative research and (4) guidance on grading levels of qualitative evidence. A narrative synthesis was conducted to identify key similarities between included studies. RESULTS: Of 9073 records retrieved, 51 went through to full-manuscript review, with 15 selected for inclusion. Six articles described methodological tools to assess the quality of qualitative research. The tools evaluated research design, recruitment, ethical rigour, data collection and analysis. Seven articles described one approach, focusing on four key components to determine how much confidence to place in findings from systematic reviews of qualitative research. Two articles focused on grading levels of clinical recommendations based on qualitative evidence; one described a qualitative evidence hierarchy, and another a research pyramid. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of consensus on the use of tools, checklists and approaches suitable for appraising the methodological quality of qualitative research and the grading of qualitative evidence to inform clinical practice. This work is expected to facilitate the inclusion of qualitative evidence in the process of developing recommendations at EULAR level.


Subject(s)
Qualitative Research , Research Design , Humans , Research Design/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic
2.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 2024 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724076

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient research partners (PRPs) are people with a disease who collaborate in a research team as partners. The aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to assess barriers and facilitators to PRP involvement in rheumatology research. METHODS: The SLR was conducted in PubMed/Medline for articles on PRP involvement in rheumatology research, published between 2017 and 2023; websites were also searched in rheumatology and other specialties. Data were extracted regarding the definition of PRPs, their role and added value, as well as barriers and facilitators to PRP involvement. The quality of the articles was assessed. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and principles of thematic content analysis was applied to qualitative data. RESULTS: Of 1016 publications, 53 articles were included; the majority of these studies were qualitative studies (26%), opinion articles (21%), meeting reports (17%) and mixed-methods studies (11%). Roles of PRPs ranged from research partners to patient advocates, advisors and patient reviewers. PRPs were reported/advised to be involved early in the project (32% of articles) and in all research phases (30%), from the conception stage to the implementation of research findings. The main barriers were challenges in communication and support for both PRPs and researchers. Facilitators of PRP involvement included more than one PRP per project, training of PRPs and researchers, a supportive environment for PRPs (including adequate communication, acknowledgement and compensation of PRPs) and the presence of a PRP coordinator. CONCLUSION: This SLR identified barriers and facilitators to PRP involvement, and was key to updating the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations for PRP-researcher collaboration based on scientific evidence.

3.
Lupus Sci Med ; 11(1)2024 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724183

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia and its clinical significance in Turkish women with SLE, exploring the association between muscle mass, muscle strength and SLE disease activity. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Gazi University Hospital's Department of Rheumatology from January to December 2020. It involved 82 patients with SLE, diagnosed according to the 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria, and 69 healthy controls. Sarcopenia was assessed using hand grip dynamometry (hand grip strength (HGS)) and bioelectrical impedance analysis for muscle mass, with sarcopenia defined according to the 2018 European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People criteria and specific cut-offs for the Turkish population. The main outcomes measured were the presence of sarcopenia and probable sarcopenia, HGS values, skeletal muscle mass index and SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). RESULTS: Among the patients with SLE, 51.2% met the criteria for probable sarcopenia and 12.9% were diagnosed with sarcopenia. The mean HGS was significantly lower in the SLE group (21.7±4.9 kg) compared with controls, indicating reduced muscle strength. The prevalence of anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies was 82.9%. Multivariate regression analysis identified height and levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies as independent predictors for developing probable sarcopenia. No significant association was found between clinical parameters, including SLEDAI-2K scores, and sarcopenia status. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia is prevalent among Turkish women with SLE, with a significant proportion showing reduced muscle strength. The study found no direct association between sarcopenia and SLE disease activity or clinical parameters. These findings underscore the importance of including muscle strength assessments in the routine clinical evaluation of patients with SLE to potentially improve management and quality of life.


Subject(s)
Hand Strength , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Muscle Strength , Sarcopenia , Humans , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Sarcopenia/physiopathology , Sarcopenia/diagnosis , Female , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/epidemiology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/physiopathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Turkey/epidemiology , Adult , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Case-Control Studies , Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Severity of Illness Index
4.
Int J Equity Health ; 23(1): 94, 2024 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720303

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The COVID-19 pandemic has reignited a commitment from the health policy and health services research communities to rebuilding trust in healthcare and created a renewed appetite for measures of trust for system monitoring and evaluation. The aim of the present paper was to develop a multidimensional measure of trust in healthcare that: (1) Is responsive to the conceptual and methodological limitations of existing measures; (2) Can be used to identify systemic explanations for lower levels of trust in equity-deserving populations; (3) Can be used to design and evaluate interventions aiming to (re)build trust. METHODS: We conducted a 2021 review of existing measures of trust in healthcare, 72 qualitative interviews (Aug-Dec 2021; oversampling for equity-deserving populations), an expert review consensus process (Oct 2021), and factor analyses and validation testing based on two waves of survey data (Nov 2021, n = 694; Jan-Feb 2022, n = 740 respectively). FINDINGS: We present the Trust in Multidimensional Healthcare Systems Scale (TIMHSS); a 38-item correlated three-factor measure of trust in doctors, policies, and the system. Measurement of invariance tests suggest that the TIMHSS can also be reliably administered to diverse populations. CONCLUSIONS: This global measure of trust in healthcare can be used to measure trust over time at a population level, or used within specific subpopulations, to inform interventions to (re)build trust. It can also be used within a clinical setting to provide a stronger evidence base for associations between trust and therapeutic outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care , Trust , Humans , Female , Male , Adult , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pandemics
5.
Stroke ; 55(7): e199-e230, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695183

ABSTRACT

The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association released a revised spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage guideline in 2022. A working group of stroke experts reviewed this guideline and identified a subset of recommendations that were deemed suitable for creating performance measures. These 15 performance measures encompass a wide spectrum of intracerebral hemorrhage patient care, from prehospital to posthospital settings, highlighting the importance of timely interventions. The measures also include 5 quality measures and address potential challenges in data collection, with the aim of future improvements.


Subject(s)
American Heart Association , Cerebral Hemorrhage , Humans , Cerebral Hemorrhage/therapy , United States , Stroke/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards
6.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 17(5): e010791, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38618717

ABSTRACT

The US health care industry has broadly adopted performance and quality measures that are extracted from electronic health records and connected to payment incentives that hope to improve declining life expectancy and health status and reduce costs. While the development of a quality measurement infrastructure based on electronic health record data was an important first step in addressing US health outcomes, these metrics, reflecting the average performance across diverse populations, do not adequately adjust for population demographic differences, social determinants of health, or ecosystem vulnerability. Like society as a whole, health care must confront the powerful impact that social determinants of health, race, ethnicity, and other demographic variations have on key health care performance indicators and quality metrics. Tools that are currently available to capture and report the health status of Americans lack the granularity, complexity, and standardization needed to improve health and address disparities at the local level. In this article, we discuss the current and future state of electronic clinical quality measures through a lens of equity.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , Health Equity , Healthcare Disparities , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Social Determinants of Health , Humans , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Healthcare Disparities/standards , Electronic Health Records/standards , Health Equity/standards , Quality Improvement/standards , Social Justice , Cultural Diversity , Health Status Disparities , Social Inclusion , United States , Diversity, Equity, Inclusion
7.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 486, 2024 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641612

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Burn treatments are complex, and for this reason, a specialised multidisciplinary approach is recommended. Evaluating the quality of care provided to acute burn patients through quality indicators makes it possible to develop and implement measures aiming at better results. There is a lack of information on which indicators to evaluate care in burn patients. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify a list of quality indicators used to evaluate the quality of hospital care provided to acute burn patients and indicate possible aspects of care that do not have specific indicators in the literature. METHOD: A comprehensive scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Lilacs/VHL) between July 25 and 30, 2022 and redone on October 6, 2022. Potentially relevant articles were evaluated for eligibility. General data and the identified quality indicators were collected for each included article. Each indicator was classified as a structure, process, or outcome indicator. RESULTS: A total of 1548 studies were identified, 82 were included, and their reference lists were searched, adding 19 more publications. Thus, data were collected from 101 studies. This review identified eight structure quality indicators, 72 process indicators, and 19 outcome indicators listed and subdivided according to their objectives. CONCLUSION: This study obtained a list of quality indicators already used to monitor and evaluate the hospital care of acute burn patients. These indicators may be useful for further research or implementation in quality improvement programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework platform on June 27, 2022 ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NAW85 ).


Subject(s)
Burns , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Humans , Burns/therapy , Hospitals , Quality Improvement
8.
Preprint in Portuguese | SciELO Preprints | ID: pps-8343

ABSTRACT

The Previne Brasil Program was created as a new financing model for Primary Care. It is a mixed method that involves weighted funding, payment for performance and incentives for strategic actions. This study aims to identify and analyze variations in financial transfers in Primary Health Care, imposed by the Previne Brasil Program, in selected municipalities in Bahia. This is a case study with a quantitative approach, divided into three stages: a) selection of three municipalities with the best and three municipalities with the worst averages of the Final Synthetic Indicator, between 2020 and 2022, from each Regional Health Center from Bahia; b) a database was created with the financial transfers of these selected municipalities, between the years 2017 and 2022; c) analysis of financial losses and gains. The results showed that the Previne Brasil Program emerged with difficult operationalization, requiring the publication of flexible ordinances to mitigate its negative effects. In Bahia, municipalities with a smaller population achieved better results in performance indicators and cities with high coverage of the Family Health Strategy expanded their budgets. In short, there was an increase in financial transfers to most municipalities in Bahia, but Previne Brasil was not able to solve the historical problem of underfunding. Therefore, it is necessary to review the Primary Health Care financing program and increase its proportion of resources in relation to medium and high complexity.


O Programa Previne Brasil foi criado como um novo modelo de financiamento da Atenção Básica. É um método misto que envolve a captação ponderada, o pagamento por desempenho e o incentivo para as ações estratégicas. Este estudo tem o objetivo identificar e analisar as variações dos repasses financeiros na Atenção Primária à Saúde, impostas pelo Programa Previne Brasil, em municípios selecionados da Bahia. Trata-se de um estudo de caso com uma abordagem quantitativa, dividida em três etapas: a) seleção de três municípios com as melhores e três municípios com as piores médias do Indicador Sintético Final, entre 2020 e 2022, de cada Núcleo Regional de Saúde da Bahia; b) foi elaborado um banco de dados com os repasses financeiros desses municípios selecionados, entre os anos de 2017 a 2022; c) análise das perdas e ganhos financeiros. Os resultados evidenciaram que o Programa Previne Brasil surgiu com uma difícil operacionalização, demandando que fossem publicadas portarias de flexibilizações para amenizar seus efeitos negativos. Na Bahia, os municípios com menor população conseguiram melhores resultados nos indicadores de desempenho e as cidades com uma alta cobertura da Estratégia de Saúde da Família ampliaram seus orçamentos. Em suma, houve aumento no repasse financeiro para a maioria dos municípios baianos, mas o Previne Brasil não foi resolutivo no problema histórico do subfinanciamento. Portanto, é necessário rever o Programa de financiamento da Atenção Primária à Saúde e aumentar sua proporção de recursos em relação à média e alta complexidade.

9.
BMC Emerg Med ; 24(1): 28, 2024 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38360551

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Older adults are at high risk of developing delirium in the emergency department (ED); however, it is under-recognized in routine clinical care. Lack of detection and treatment is associated with poor outcomes, such as mortality. Performance measures (PMs) are needed to identify variations in quality care to help guide improvement strategies. The purpose of this study is to gain consensus on a set of quality statements and PMs that can be used to evaluate delirium care quality for older ED patients. METHODS: A 3-round modified e-Delphi study was conducted with ED clinical experts. In each round, participants rated quality statements according to the concepts of importance and actionability, then their associated PMs according to the concept of necessity (1-9 Likert scales), with the ability to comment on each. Consensus and stability were evaluated using a priori criteria using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data was examined to identify themes within and across quality statements and PMs, which went through a participant validation exercise in the final round. RESULTS: Twenty-two experts participated, 95.5% were from west or central Canada. From 10 quality statements and 24 PMs, consensus was achieved for six quality statements and 22 PMs. Qualitative data supported justification for including three quality statements and one PM that achieved consensus slightly below a priori criteria. Three overarching themes emerged from the qualitative data related to quality statement actionability. Nine quality statements, nine structure PMs, and 14 process PMs are included in the final set, addressing four areas of delirium care: screening, diagnosis, risk reduction and management. CONCLUSION: Results provide a set of quality statements and PMs that are important, actionable, and necessary to a diverse group of clinical experts. To our knowledge, this is the first known study to develop a de novo set of guideline-based quality statements and PMs to evaluate the quality of delirium care older adults receive in the ED setting.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Quality of Health Care , Humans , Aged , Delphi Technique , Surveys and Questionnaires , Emergency Service, Hospital , Delirium/diagnosis , Delirium/therapy
11.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 41: 63-71, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241886

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify the association between healthcare fragmentation and survival for patients with colorectal cancer in Colombia. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using administrative databases, with an electronic algorithm to identify patients with colorectal cancer based on codes. The patients were enrolled between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. The exposure variable was fragmentation, which was measured based on the number of different healthcare institutions that treated a patient during the first year after diagnosis. Matching was performed using propensity scores to control for confounding, and the hazard ratio for exposure to higher fragmentation was calculated for the matched sample. RESULTS: A total of 5036 patients with colorectal cancer were identified, 2525 (49.88%) of whom were women. The mean number of network healthcare institutions for the total sample was 5.71 (SD 1.98). The patients in the quartile with higher fragmentation had the highest mortality rate, 35.67 (95% CI 33.63-38.06) per 100 patients. The comparison of higher and lower quartiles of fragmentation resulted in an incidence rate ratio of 1.23 (95% CI 1.04-1.45; P = .02). Of the 5036 patients, 422 (8.38%) were classified as the exposed cohort (higher fragmentation). The total matched sample consisted of 844 subjects, and an HR of 1.26 (95%CI; 1.05-1.51) was estimated. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to more highly fragmented healthcare networks decreases overall 4-year survival for patients with colorectal cancer in Colombia.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colombia/epidemiology , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Propensity Score
12.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 83(1): 112-120, 2024 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37907255

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe the data structure and harmonisation process, explore data quality and define characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients across six federated antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) registries. METHODS: Through creation of the vasculitis-specific Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable, VASCulitis ontology, we harmonised the registries and enabled semantic interoperability. We assessed data quality across the domains of uniqueness, consistency, completeness and correctness. Aggregated data were retrieved using the semantic query language SPARQL Protocol and Resource Description Framework Query Language (SPARQL) and outcome rates were assessed through random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5282 cases of AAV were identified. Uniqueness and data-type consistency were 100% across all assessed variables. Completeness and correctness varied from 49%-100% to 60%-100%, respectively. There were 2754 (52.1%) cases classified as granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), 1580 (29.9%) as microscopic polyangiitis and 937 (17.7%) as eosinophilic GPA. The pattern of organ involvement included: lung in 3281 (65.1%), ear-nose-throat in 2860 (56.7%) and kidney in 2534 (50.2%). Intravenous cyclophosphamide was used as remission induction therapy in 982 (50.7%), rituximab in 505 (17.7%) and pulsed intravenous glucocorticoid use was highly variable (11%-91%). Overall mortality and incidence rates of end-stage kidney disease were 28.8 (95% CI 19.7 to 42.2) and 24.8 (95% CI 19.7 to 31.1) per 1000 patient-years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest reported AAV cohort-study, we federated patient registries using semantic web technologies and highlighted concerns about data quality. The comparison of patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes was hampered by heterogeneous recruitment settings.


Subject(s)
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis , Microscopic Polyangiitis , Humans , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/drug therapy , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/epidemiology , Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis/complications , Data Accuracy , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/drug therapy , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/epidemiology , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/complications , Microscopic Polyangiitis/drug therapy , Microscopic Polyangiitis/epidemiology , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic , Registries , Information Storage and Retrieval
13.
Rev. Col. Bras. Cir ; 51: e20243667, 2024.
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1535116

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT The 35th Brazilian Congress of Surgery marked a turning point for surgical education in the country. For the first time, the Brazilian College of Surgeons included Global Surgery on the main congressional agenda, providing a unique opportunity to rethink how surgical skills are taught from a public health perspective. This discussion prompts us to consider why and how Global Surgery education should be expanded in Brazil. Although Brazilian researchers and institutions have contributed to the fields expansion since 2015, Global Surgery education initiatives are still incipient in our country. Relying on successful strategies can be a starting point to promote the area among national surgical practitioners. In this editorial, we discuss potential strategies to expand Global Surgery education opportunities and propose a series of recommendations at the national level.


RESUMO O 35º Congresso Brasileiro de Cirurgia foi marcado por discussões inovadoras para a educação cirúrgica no país. Pela primeira vez, o Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões incluiu a Cirurgia Global na pauta principal do congresso, proporcionando uma oportunidade única de repensar como as habilidades cirúrgicas são ensinadas a partir de uma perspectiva de saúde pública. Essa discussão nos leva a considerar por que e como o ensino da Cirurgia Global deve ser expandido no Brasil. Embora pesquisadores e instituições brasileiras tenham contribuído para a expansão do campo desde 2015, as iniciativas de educação em Cirurgia Global ainda são incipientes em nosso país. Basear-se em estratégias bem-sucedidas pode ser um ponto de partida para promover a área entre os profissionais de cirurgia nacionais. Neste editorial, discutimos potenciais estratégias para expandir as oportunidades de educação em Cirurgia Global e propomos uma série de recomendações a nível nacional.

14.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 82(12): 1642, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37949476
15.
RMD Open ; 9(4)2023 11 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37996123

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The inclusion of patient research partners (PRPs) in research projects is increasingly recognised and recommended in rheumatology. The level of involvement of PRPs in translational research in rheumatology remains unknown, while in randomised clinical trials (RCTs), it has been reported to be 2% in 2020. Therefore, we aimed to assess the involvement of PRPs in recent translational studies and RCTs in rheumatology. METHODS: We conducted a scoping literature review of the 80 most recent articles (40 translational studies and 40 RCTs) from four target diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and lower extremity osteoarthritis. We selected 20 papers from each disease, published up until 1 March 2023, in rheumatology and general scientific journals. In each paper, the extent of PRP involvement was assessed. Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: Of 40 translational studies, none reported PRP involvement. Of 40 RCTs, eight studies (20%) reported PRP involvement. These trials were mainly from Europe (75%) and North America (25%). Most of them (75%) were non-industry funded. The type of PRP involvement was reported in six of eight studies: six studies reported PRP participation in the study design or design of the intervention and two of them in the interpretation of the results. All the trials reporting the number of PRPs (75%), involved at least two PRPs. CONCLUSION: Despite a worldwide movement advocating for increased patient involvement in research, PRPs in translational research and RCTs in rheumatology are significantly under-represented. This limited involvement of PRPs in research highlights a persistent gap between the existing recommendations and actual practice.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Psoriatic , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Rheumatology , Humans , Patient Participation
16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37775110

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: It is well known that social determinants of health (SDOH), including poverty, education, transportation and housing, are important predictors of health outcomes. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-funded health centres serve a patient population with high vulnerability to barriers posed by SDOH and are required to provide services that enable health centre service utilisation and assist patients in navigating barriers to care. This study explores whether health centres with higher percentages of patients using these enabling services experience better clinical performance and outcomes. DESIGN AND SETTING: The analysis uses organisational characteristics, patient demographics and clinical quality measures from HRSA's 2018 Uniform Data System. Health centres (n=875) were sorted into quartiles with quartile 1 (Q1) representing the lowest utilisation of enabling services and quartile 4 (Q4) representing the highest. The researchers calculated a service area social deprivation score weighted by the number of patients for each health centre and used ordinary least squares to create adjusted values for each of the clinical quality process and outcome measures. Analysis of variance was used to test differences across enabling services quartiles. RESULTS: After adjusting for patient characteristics, health centre size and social deprivation, authors found statistically significant differences for all clinical quality process measures across enabling services quartiles, with Q4 health centres performing significantly better than Q1 health centres for several clinical process measures. However, these Q4 health centres performed poorer in outcome measures, including blood pressure and haemoglobin A1c control. CONCLUSION: These findings emphasise the importance of how enabling services (eg, translation services, transportation) can address unmet social needs, improve utilisation of health services and reaffirm the challenges inherent in overcoming SDOH to improve health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Health Facilities , Social Determinants of Health , Humans , Health Services , Population Groups , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
17.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 82(9): 1242, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37567611
18.
Lupus Sci Med ; 10(2)2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37524516

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Frailty is a risk factor for adverse health in adults with SLE, including those <65 years. Emergency department (ED) utilisation is high in adults with SLE, but to our knowledge, whether frailty is associated with ED use is unknown. In a large administrative claims dataset, we assessed risk of ED utilisation among frail adults with SLE ≤65 years of age relative to non-frail adults ≤65 years of age with SLE. METHODS: Using the MarketScan Medicaid subset from 2011 to 2015, we identified beneficiaries 18-65 years with SLE (≥3 SLE International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes ≥30 days apart). Comparators without a systemic rheumatic disease (SRD) were matched 4:1 on age and gender. Frailty status in 2011 was determined using two claims-based frailty indices (CFIs). We compared risk of recurrent ED utilisation among frail and non-frail beneficiaries with SLE using an extension of the Cox proportional hazard model for recurrent events data. RESULTS: Of 2262 beneficiaries with SLE and 9048 non-SRD comparators, 28.8% and 11.6% were frail, respectively, according to both CFIs. Compared with non-frail beneficiaries with SLE, frail beneficiaries with SLE had significantly higher hazard of recurrent ED use (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.48 to 2.08). CONCLUSION: Frailty increased hazard of recurrent ED visits in frail adults ≤65 years of age with SLE relative to comparable non-frail adults with SLE. Frailty is a potential target for efforts to improve quality of care in SLE.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , United States/epidemiology , Adult , Humans , Aged , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/epidemiology , Frailty/complications , Frailty/epidemiology , Medicaid , Emergency Service, Hospital , Data Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...