Rapid rituximab administration: Safety of 60-minute infusions in malignant and benign haematological disease.

INTRODUCTION: Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody used to treat a range of malignant and benign haematological conditions. To minimise the risk of infusion-related toxicity, initial infusions are administered slowly over 4-6 h. In the absence of significant reactions, subsequent doses are often administered over an off-label rate of 90 min. In response to emergent data, our site adopted the use of rapid 60-min infusions for third and subsequent doses. This study aimed to review the safety and ongoing feasibility of 60-min rituximab infusions following institutional practice change. METHODS: Pharmacy dispensing records were used to identify all rituximab infusions dispensed under the direction of a haematologist between 1 January 2023 and 30 June 2023. Electronic medical records were reviewed retrospectively to characterise the incidence of infusion reactions. RESULTS: Eight-two patients received a total of 262 rituximab infusions, including 54 patients who received a total of 113 rapid 60-min infusions. No infusion-related reactions were observed with 60-min administration. Five patients who experienced grade 1-2 infusion reactions with their first or second dose of rituximab safely received 60-min infusions for third and subsequent doses without additional premedication. Indications for treatment included non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (76.99%), non-malignant disease states (17.70%), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (3.54%) and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (1.77%). CONCLUSION: In the absence of severe reactions to initial and second doses, administration of rituximab over 60 min is well tolerated in patients with malignant and benign haematological disease.

Impact of rapid iodine contrast agent infusion on tracheal diameter and lung volume in CT pulmonary angiography measured with deep learning-based algorithm.

PURPOSE: To compare computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography and unenhanced CT to determine the effect of rapid iodine contrast agent infusion on tracheal diameter and lung volume. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 101 patients who underwent CT pulmonary angiography and unenhanced CT, for which the time interval between them was within 365 days. CT pulmonary angiography was scanned 20 s after starting the contrast agent injection at the end-inspiratory level. Commercial software, which was developed based on deep learning technique, was used to segment the lung, and its volume was automatically evaluated. The tracheal diameter at the thoracic inlet level was also measured. Then, the ratios for the CT pulmonary angiography to unenhanced CT of the tracheal diameter (TDPAU) and both lung volumes (BLVPAU) were calculated. RESULTS: Tracheal diameter and both lung volumes were significantly smaller in CT pulmonary angiography (17.2 ± 2.6 mm and 3668 ± 1068 ml, respectively) than those in unenhanced CT (17.7 ± 2.5 mm and 3887 ± 1086 ml, respectively) (p < 0.001 for both). A statistically significant correlation was found between TDPAU and BLVPAU with a correlation coefficient of 0.451 (95% confidence interval, 0.280-0.594) (p < 0.001). No factor showed a significant association with TDPAU. The type of contrast agent had a significant association for BLVPAU (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid infusion of iodine contrast agent reduced the tracheal diameter and both lung volumes in CT pulmonary angiography, which was scanned at end-inspiratory level, compared with those in unenhanced CT.

Safety of a 90-min duration of intravenous infusion of obinutuzumab in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in a tertiary hospital in China: a prospective, open-label, exploratory clinical trial

This study aimed to analyze the safety and applicability of a 90-min duration of infusion (SDI) of obinutuzumab in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in a tertiary hospital in China. This exploratory clinical trial was performed at Jiangsu Province Hospital. All patients were treated with the standard infusion regimen for the first infusion. If no grade ≥3 infusion-related reactions (IRRs) occurred, the subsequent infusions were given as SDI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of IRR during the standard infusion (3-4 h) and 90-min SDI regimens. This study enrolled 208 patients and all completed cycle 1. Forty-one patients (19.71%) had IRRs: five (2.40%) with grade 1, twenty-eight (13.46%) with grade 2, and eight (3.85%) with grade 3. The 41 patients had 71 IRRs, mainly fever (40.85%), chest pain/tightness (12.68%), and dyspnea (9.86%). The occurrence of IRRs in the first infusion was significantly lower in patients who received oral acetaminophen prophylaxis than those who did not (10.72% vs 30.21%, P<0.001). For the subsequent cycles with 90-min SDI, only two (0.25%) IRRs occurred among 814 infusions (one grade 1 hand numbness and one grade 2 chill/fever). The 90-min obinutuzumab SDI might be safe and feasible in patients with B-cell NHL in China.

The safety of ABO minor incompatible platelets transfusions using a rapid infuser.

BACKGROUND: Administering platelets through a rapid infuser is proven to be safe. However, the clinical significance of infusing ABO-incompatible platelets with red blood cells (RBCs) in a rapid infuser remains unclear. There is a theoretical risk that isoagglutinin in the plasma of a platelet unit can interact with RBCs and induce hemolysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven in vitro studies were performed including five cases (type A RBCs and type O platelets) and two controls (type A RBCs and platelets). Anti-A titers were measured in platelet units. An RBC unit and a platelet unit were mixed in the rapid infuser reservoir and incubated for 30 min. The primary outcome was the presence of hemolysis based on the following parameters: free hemoglobin concentration, hemolysis check, direct antiglobulin test (DAT), and direct agglutination. RESULTS: The post-mix DAT was positive for IgG in all test samples (5/5), and weakly positive for complement in 3/5. The changes in free Hb in test cases between measured and calculated post-mix spanned -2.2 to +3.4 mg/dL. Post-mix hemolysis check was negative in 3/5 and slightly positive in 2/5 cases, with no significant differences compared to the control case. Anti-A titers ranged from 16 to 512 and were not associated with hemolysis. All samples were negative for direct agglutination. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that mixing ABO-incompatible platelets with RBCs in a rapid infuser does not induce in vitro hemolysis. These findings support the use of rapid infusers regardless of platelet compatibility in support of hemostatic resuscitation.

Fast but not furious: Rapid ocrelizumab infusion as a strategy to optimize multiple sclerosis patients' management.

OBJECTIVES: Multiple sclerosis clinicians are continuously challenged to be innovative in delivering therapies and there is ongoing pressure to maximize day-hospital vacancies. We describe our single-center experience with ocrelizumab (OCR) rapid infusion (OCR-RI) in patients with MS (pwMS). METHODS: For pwMS with prior exposure to OCR standard infusion (OCR-SI) for at least one year/two cycles, infusion time was reduced from 3.5 to 2.0 h. A comparative analysis between OCR-RI vs OCR-SI patients was conducted. RESULTS: 283 (76.7%) out of 369 OCR-treated pwMS performed OCR-RI; 86 subjects did not start OCR-RI due to infusion-related reactions (IRR) occurring with OCR-SI (n = 13) or OCR-treatment duration shorter than one year (n = 73). Disease duration was longer in OCR-RI (p < 0.001). Median numbers of overall-OCR and OCR-RI cycles were 7 (IQR = 5-8) and 4 (IQR = 2-5) (p < 0.001). Overall, 38 (10.3%) IRR were reported, 25 (8.8%) in OCR-RI and 13 (15.1%) in OCR-SI group. IRR frequency did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.106). IRR included throat irritation, rash, hypotension, fever and gastrointestinal symptoms. IRR severity was mild (81.6%) or moderate (18.4%), all resolved and did not differ in distribution between the two groups. When IRR occurred, infusions were temporarily stopped, hydration and/or symptomatic medications were given and infusions were subsequently resumed at standard velocity. OCR-RI was not a risk factor for IRR (OR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.27-1.13, p = 0.096). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, IRR frequency, severity and management were comparable to literature. No severe IRR were observed. RI protocols represent a strategy to optimize patients' management in the clinic.

Rapid home therapy infusion of velaglucerase alfa in naïve patients with Gaucher disease.

BACKGROUND: Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) has revolutionised the management of patients with Gaucher disease (GD). In 2018, we published the safety and efficacy of rapid 10-min infusion of velaglucerase alfa in previously treated patients, mostly on low-dose therapy. AIM: To improve quality of life (QoL) for patients needing lifelong bi-weekly infusions by introducing a 10-min infusion instead of 1 h per label in patients naive to ERT and on high-dose therapy. METHODS: Fifteen naive patients were enrolled; all received bi-weekly infusions of 60 units/kgBW velaglucerase alfa; the infusion rate was gradually reduced in the hospital, followed by home infusions. Each infusion was followed for safety. Efficacy parameters were assessed every 3 months. Patient-reported outcome questionnaires were collected at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: Ten-minute rapid infusions were well tolerated without related severe adverse events (SAEs). Two patients experienced a non-related SAE and another a possibly related AE. In three patients, the infusion rate was increased to 30 or 60 min (two because of suboptimal response and one because of AE). Two patients dropped out because of an unwillingness to attend follow-up visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. All 13 remaining patients reached the 24-month end-point. The platelet counts increased by a median (range) of 68.38% (12.5-300%) and the lyso-Gb1 levels decreased by 62.6% (32.9-89.9%). CONCLUSION: Home therapy with rapid infusion of high-dose velaglucerase alfa was a safe, effective and preferable alternative for patients with GD naïve to treatment. We believe that shortening the infusion time improves the QoL of patients with GD who have a lifelong commitment to intravenous therapy.

A Phase II, Open-Label Study of an Accelerated Infusion Rate of Daratumumab in Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody initially approved as a single agent for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. The infusion-related reactions (IRRs) commonly seen with intravenous daratumumab have been managed by prolonging the first infusion, temporarily stopping/slowing the rate if reactions occur and using adequate pre- and post-infusion medications. Several retrospective studies have evaluated shorter infusions after ≥ 2 prior doses administered at the standard rates. Although the shorter infusions were well-tolerated, patients in these reports were given heterogeneous daratumumab regimens and had often already received multiple doses at the longer standard rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CMRG-009 is a prospective study designed to demonstrate the safety of accelerated daratumumab infusions commencing with the second dose. After an initial dose on Cycle 1 Day consisting of 8 mg/kg over 4 hours, all subsequent doses were given over 90 minutes. RESULTS: No grade 3 IRRs were observed with the 90-minutes infusions. Both the safety profile and anti-myeloma effects were otherwise similar to those observed with other single agent daratumumab studies using longer infusion times. CONCLUSION: This is the first formal prospective trial using infusion times shorter than the standard schedule directly after an initial 4-hours dose. This rapid infusion protocol has resulted in more efficient resource utilization and has become the standard protocol for the use in all intravenous daratumumab regimens in Canada. This approach has been particularly helpful in shortening chair time during the COVID-19 pandemic and providing a useful alternative in jurisdictions without access to subcutaneous daratumumab.

Micro-Stick to Rapid Infusion Catheter (RIC): Ultrasound-Guided Rapid Infusion Catheter Insertion Using a Micropuncture Kit.

Ultrasound-guidance improves success for difficult intravenous access (DIVA), particularly when difficulty is anticipated. However, insertion of a wide-bore sheath, such as a rapid infusion catheter, is likely to pose additional problems and unique challenges in this context, despite ultrasound guidance. With the aid of a video clinical simulation, this article describes an ultrasound-guided technique for inserting a proprietary rapid infusion catheter (RIC) or similar wide-bore sheath using the micropuncture kit.

A phase I/II study of 10-min dosing of bendamustine hydrochloride (rapid infusion formulation) in patients with previously untreated indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, or relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Japan.

PURPOSE: This phase I/II clinical study was conducted to examine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of 10-min dosing of bendamustine in patients with previously untreated indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (Group 1) and patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (rrDLBCL) (Group 2). METHODS: Rituximab 375 mg/m2 was administered intravenously every 28 days to Group 1 patients on day 1 and every 21 days to Group 2 patients on day 1. Bendamustine 90 mg/m2/day was administered to the former on days 1 and 2; bendamustine 120 mg/m2/day was administered to the latter on days 2 and 3. Each regimen was delivered up to six cycles for both groups. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. RESULTS: Among 37 enrolled patients, safety was assessed in 36. In Group 1 (n = 30), 27 patients (90%) had follicular lymphoma. Adverse events (AEs) were observed in all 30 patients in Group 1. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in two of six patients in Group 2. Common AEs included lymphocyte count decreased (86.7%, 100%). In Group 1, overall response and complete response rates were 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 77.2-99.2%) and 75.9% (95% CI 56.5-89.7%), respectively. The Cmax and AUC of bendamustine tended to be higher in Group 2 than in Group 1. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that bendamustine is safe, well-tolerated and effective for patients with previously untreated iNHL, MCL or rrDLBCL. Pharmacokinetic data were equivalent to those obtained outside of Japan. REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Registration NCT03900377; registered April 3, 2019.

The safety of rapid infusion levetiracetam: A systematic review.

Epilepsy is a common diagnosis and can quickly progress to status epilepticus which requires rapid treatment. Levetiracetam is a frequent treatment choice in these situations. The approved administration of intravenous levetiracetam is an infusion over 15 min. In recent years, studies have been published on faster infusion rates of levetiracetam. The objective of this review is to discuss the safety of levetiracetam as an intravenous push at a rate quicker than recommended. A literature search using PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar resulted in 192 articles. Inclusion criteria consisted of English language, human studies, use of levetiracetam administered intravenously at a rate faster than 15 min, discussion of safety, and full-text availability. After screening, nine articles remained for inclusion. Of the nine articles, one was a prospective, open-label study, six were retrospective studies, and two were open-label, randomized controlled trials. The most common rapid infusion speed was 5 min and doses ranged from 280 to 4500 mg. Some of these trials used undiluted levetiracetam and many reported that peripheral access was used for a portion or all of the administrations. There were few adverse effects, including specific adverse effects relating to medication concentration and speed of infusion, in all the studies. Administration of intravenous levetiracetam at a rate faster than recommended in the labeling information appears to be safe and tolerable and can be given via a peripheral line. Rapid infusion of levetiracetam is a beneficial method of administration in an acute care setting where patients need rapid attainment of therapeutic levels of antiepileptic medications. Additional research is needed to ensure that rapid administration of intravenous levetiracetam is as efficacious as the traditional dosing method.

Safety of Rapid Daratumumab Infusion: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Real-Life Analysis on 134 Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

Background: The anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab is the backbone of most anti-multiple myeloma (MM) regimens. To mitigate the risk of infusion-related reactions (IRRs), intravenous daratumumab administration requires 7 hours for the first infusion and 3.5-4 hours thereafter, thus making daratumumab-containing regimens burdensome for patients and health care resources. Preliminary data suggest that a rapid (90-minute) infusion of daratumumab is safe and does not increase IRRs. The rapid schedule was adopted by our centers since 2019. Methods: We conducted an observational multi-center, real-life study to assess the safety of rapid daratumumab infusion protocol from the third administration in relapsed MM patients receiving daratumumab alone or in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone or bortezomib-dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was the safety of the rapid infusion protocol, particularly in terms of IRRs. Results: A total of 134 MM patients were enrolled. IRRs occurred in 7 (5%) patients and were mostly mild (6/7 of grade 1-2), with only 1 patient experiencing a grade 3 IRR. Due to the IRRs, 5 (3.7%) patients discontinued the rapid infusions and resumed daratumumab at the standard infusion rate, while 1 patient permanently discontinued daratumumab. In 4/7 patients (57%), IRRs occurred while resuming rapid daratumumab infusions after a temporary interruption (2-4 months). No other adverse event was considered related to the rapid infusion protocol. Conclusions: Our findings confirmed the safety of rapid daratumumab infusions starting from the third administration. In case of prolonged daratumumab interruption, it is advisable to resume infusions at the standard rate (3.5 hours) before switching to the rapid infusion.

Impact of electronic interventions on guideline concordant ordering of rituximab infusion rate.

INTRODUCTION: Rituximab carries a boxed warning for severe or fatal infusion reactions; most occurring with the initial infusion. Prior studies established that if the initial rituximab infusion is tolerated, subsequent infusions can be given safely over 90 min. The University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) did not have a standardized method to document infusion reactions for outpatient chemotherapy patients, making it challenging for providers to know a patients' eligibility for rapid infusion. This quality improvement project focused on a series of interventions to improve documentation and electronic ordering of rituximab. METHODS: A flowsheet for nurses to record patients' tolerance of chemotherapy infusions was created within the electronic health record (EHR). Following results of flowsheet impact, a second intervention was implemented to modify ordering of rituximab. The primary endpoint was the incidence of guideline concordant rate ordering of rituximab. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of accurate chair time scheduling pre- and post-interventions and nursing compliance with flowsheet documentation. RESULTS: Prior to flowsheet implementation, 85% of patients were infused at the guideline concordant rate, compared to 79% post-implementation. Prior to modification of rituximab ordering in the EHR, 85% of patients were infused at the guideline concordant rate, compared to 87% after implementation. Complete nursing documentation was done 89% of the time when the flowsheet was utilized, compared to 11% pre-interventions. CONCLUSION: No difference in primary or secondary endpoints was found following our interventions. However, the infusion documentation flowsheet, when used, provided more complete reaction data compared to when it was not used.

Safety of Rapid Infliximab Biosimilar Infusions in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: The biosimilar landscape for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to grow, with several biosimilar products for originator infliximab now available. The rapid infusion of originator infliximab and infliximab-dyyb has been shown to be well tolerated; however, the tolerability of rapid infusion in patients receiving infliximab-abda, another infliximab biosimilar, or in those who have switched among originator infliximab and biosimilars remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the safety of rapid infusion in patients with IBD who received infliximab-abda or underwent switches with infliximab products. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of all infliximab-related infusion encounters for patients ≥18 years with IBD who received their infusion over 30 to 90 minutes at our institution between March 1, 2020, and September 30, 2020. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were collected. The primary outcome was infusion reactions. RESULTS: A total of 377 infusion encounters for 96 unique patients were evaluated. Within the study cohort, 16% of patients were treated with originator infliximab, 42% with infliximab-dyyb, and 2% with infliximab-abda. The remaining 41% of patients received at least 2 infliximab products during the study period, primarily infliximab-dyyb and infliximab-abda. Approximately 54% and 42% of infusions encounters included premedication and immunomodulator use. Within the 377 infusion encounters, no infusion reactions were noted. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Rapid infusion of infliximab biosimilars (including infliximab-abda) and in patients who have switched among originator infliximab and biosimilars is well tolerated. Future studies should assess clinical impact and outcomes of rapid infusion with biosimilars.

Impact of rapid infliximab infusions on access at a large academic tertiary medical center.

PURPOSE: Infliximab promotes remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and rheumatologic disease (RD). Rapid infliximab infusions (RI) reduce infusion time from 2 hours to 1 hour and can enhance access to care, as defined by capacity, safety, and patient characteristics. Our hypothesis for the study described here was that use of RI can enhance access for patients. METHODS: Data on all patients receiving infliximab for IBD or RD at our outpatient infusion center from February 2016 to August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and clinical information were collected. RESULTS: Of 348 patients who received infliximab, 205 had IBD and 143 had RD. In terms of capacity, 40% of patients received RI, resulting in a 16.1% decrease in average daily infusion time and a 9.8% increase in average daily available scheduled infusion chair time (P = 0.720). In terms of safety, 4 patients switched back to standard infusions after RI, after 3 specifically had reactions to RI. In terms of patient characteristics, more patients with RD versus IBD received RI (P = 0.020). Among the patients with RD, a lower proportion receiving RI were female (P = 0.043). For the patients with IBD, a higher proportion receiving RI were White (P = 0.048). Among both patients with RD and patients with IBD, a higher proportion receiving RI had private insurance (P = 0.016 and P = 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSION: RI were safe and increased available chair time. Females with RD, patients of non-White race with IBD, and patients with public insurance were less likely to receive RI. Future directions include patient surveys and evaluation of implicit bias against patient factors that may impact access to RI.

Performance assessment of intravenous catheters for massive transfusion: A pragmatic in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Rapid infusion of warmed blood products is the cornerstone of trauma resuscitation and treatment of surgical and obstetric massive hemorrhage. Integral to optimizing this delivery is selection of an intravenous (IV) catheter and use of a rapid infusion device (RID). We investigated which IV catheter and RID system enabled the greatest infusion rate of blood products and the governing catheter characteristics. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The maximum flow rates of nine IV catheters were measured while infusing a mixture of packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma at a 1:1 ratio using a RID with and without a patient line extension. To account for IV catheters that achieved the RID's maximum 1000 ml/min, the conductance of each infusion circuit configuration was calculated. RESULTS: IV catheters of 7-Fr caliber or higher reached the maximum pressurized flow rate. The 9-Fr multi-lumen access catheter (MAC) achieved the greatest conductance, over sevenfold greater than the 18 g peripheral catheter (4.6 vs. 0.6 ml/min/mmHg, p < .001). Conductance was positively correlated with internal radius (ß = 1.098, 95% CI 4.286-5.025, p < .001) and negatively correlated with length (ß= - 0.495, 95% CI -0.007 to 0.005, p < .001). Use of an extension line (ß= - 0.094, 95% CI -0.505 to -0.095, p = .005) was independently associated with reduced conductance in large caliber catheters. CONCLUSION: Short, large-diameter catheters provided the greatest infusion rates of massive transfusion blood products for the least pressure. For patients requiring the highest transfusion flow rates, extension tubing should be avoided when possible.

Phenytoin-Induced Paradoxical Seizures and Blood Dyscrasias in a Patient Receiving Rapid Intravenous Infusion: A Case Report.

Paradoxical seizure is an unusual reaction of seizure aggravation or change in its pattern due to antiepileptics. Decrease in seizure threshold with phenytoin is bound to occur with an increase in serum levels. We herein report a 51-year-old female, who was brought to the intensive care unit with complaints of episodic seizures and frothing. She is a known case of tonic-clonic epilepsy on oral phenytoin 100 mg for past 6 months. Rapid intravenous infusion of 700 mg phenytoin in 100 mL normal saline over a rate of 15 minutes was initiated on admission. This was followed by a sudden abnormality of her baseline blood parameters and an occurrence of paradoxical seizure. The dose of phenytoin was tapered which reversed her condition. The patient was followed up regularly and monitored for fluctuations in her hematological parameters. The mainstay treatment for phenytoin-induced paradoxical seizure and blood dyscrasias is to monitor the patient and dose titration. Dosing of phenytoin remains a challenge for all clinicians which increase the need for such reports.

Evaluation of a pharmacist-driven rapid infusion rituximab conversion protocol at a multisite cancer center.

INTRODUCTION: Infusion-related reactions (IRR) are a common adverse event associated with rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody indicated for the treatment of B-cell lymphomas. IRR risk is highest with the first infusion, which is given by a slow titration over an average of 3.5 hours. Subsequent administrations can be given over an accelerated, rapid 90-minute infusion if patients meet specific criteria. To improve rapid infusion rituximab utilization, we developed and implemented a pharmacist-driven protocol which allows pharmacists to change the administration instructions to rapid infusion. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate patients age ≥18 years with B-cell lymphomas who were eligible to receive rapid infusion rituximab following protocol implementation. The primary outcome was the prevalence of the use of rapid infusion rituximab for eligible patients. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of pharmacist-initiated conversions to rapid infusion rituximab and incidence of IRR with rapid infusions. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients were included in this study; 89 patients in the pre-protocol group and 91 patients in the post-protocol group. Fifteen patients and 66 patients in the pre-protocol and post-protocol groups, respectively, received rapid infusion rituximab (17% vs. 73%, p < 0.00001). The pharmacist-driven protocol was used to convert 49 patients (54%) to rapid infusion. No IRR occurred in patients receiving rapid infusion rituximab. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a pharmacist-driven protocol led to a significant improvement in the use of rapid infusion rituximab and optimized chair time utilization at our institution.

A multicenter review of infusion-related reactions to daratumumab for relapsed multiple myeloma in the real world setting.

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab is used in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. Daratumumab infusion-related reactions can occur with the highest incidence on the first infusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of all daratumumab infusions used as part of the DVd and DRd regimens for relapsed multiple myeloma was undertaken. The review of infusion-related reactions was conducted by reviewing the treatment room nursing note on the days that daratumumab was administered. If the patient experienced an infusion-related reaction, then the data captured included if the full dose was administered. RESULTS: Daratumumab infusion-related reactions occurred most frequently on the first dose. The rates of infusion-related reactions using a split dose approach for daratumumab administration were lower than that reported in clinical trials. All of the infusion-related reactions were managed with appropriate interventions in the outpatient setting. The adoption of rapid infusion daratumumab beginning with cycle 2 of DVd and DRd was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience of daratumumab infusions using a split dose approach was associated with an infusion-related reaction rate in 28% of patients on cycle 1, day 1 of DVd and DRd regimens. All patients were able to complete full doses of daratumumab by utilizing split dose. The rates of daratumumab infusion-related reactions are highest on the first infusion. In addition, our adoption of rapid infusion daratumumab was safe.

Safety and Cost Benefits of the Rapid Daratumumab Infusion Protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Daratumumab is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma in both frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. Its major limitation is the long infusion time, especially with the first dose. Recent data demonstrated the feasibility of infusing daratumumab at an accelerated rate of 90 minutes starting from cycle 1 on day 15. Herein, we report the safety profile and cost associated with rapid daratumumab infusion protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A chart review was performed to identify patients who completed at least 1 cycle of daratumumab (single agent or in combination) from April 2016 to October 2018. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: cohort 1 received rapid daratumumab infusion after its implementation in March 2018, whereas cohort 2 included patients treated with daratumumab administered at the standard rate. The primary endpoint was to compare differences in rates of infusion-related reactions (IRRs). An Excel (Microsoft)-based model was developed to estimate cost and productivity. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients with relapsed/refractory disease were included in this study (53 in cohort 1 and 47 in cohort 2). Of the 53 patients in cohort 1, 18 (34%) received rapid daratumumab infusion starting with cycle 1. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in rates of IRRs between cohort 1 and 2 (1.9% vs. 4.3%, P = .59); 1 patient in cohort 1 developed an IRR. The total costs estimated for a 52-week regimen of daratumumab infused at standard and rapid rates were $137,200 and $122,200 (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that rapid daratumumab infusion is safe and tolerable and provides cost savings for patients with relapsed/refractory disease.

Rapid-Infusion Rituximab in a Pediatric Population.

OBJECTIVES: The use of rapid rituximab infusion in certain pediatric populations has generally been regarded as safe. The safety of our institution's rapid rituximab protocol was evaluated. METHODS: The primary end point was the number of and severity of adverse drug reactions. Secondary end points included a description of the patient population defined by the indication, dose, and number of rituximab infusions administered. Additionally, the difference in infusion times in hours of those receiving rapid rituximab infusions versus the theoretical infusion time of subsequent administration rate schedules was defined. RESULTS: A total of 88 infusions for 22 patients were reviewed. No dose-limiting adverse reactions were observed. Three patients experienced grade 1 isolated infusion-related adverse events during a single infusion encounter. Two of the three patients received additional doses of rapid rituximab infusions without incident, whereas the other patient no longer required rituximab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a 90-minute rituximab infusion protocol in pediatric patients with non-rheumatic diseases was well tolerated.