Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Am J Transl Res ; 15(1): 281-287, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36777824

ABSTRACT

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The goal of our study was to determine the causes of re-catheterization in a young population who were admitted with myocardial infarction and previously underwent cardiac catheterization, and determine what measures can be applied to prevent their re-catheterization. A retrospective study was conducted at Tawam hospital for 6 years (2009-2014). 50 patients between 18 and 50 years of age admitted with acute coronary syndrome who had re-catheterization within a year from their first cardiac catheterization were included. Medical records were reviewed to gather demographic data, cardiac risk factors, laboratory data, hospital course, and angiographic findings. All data was analyzed using descriptive analysis. One third of study participants had been re-admitted electively for a staged PCI, while another third had been admitted and were found to have angina as they did not have significant lesions during re-catheterization; 12 of them had ballooning done while the remaining participants had no intervention. The final third of the participants had re-catheterization due to the development of a new infarction (STEMI/NSTEMI). Of those who had a new infarction, 14% had stent thromboses while 12% had stent restenosis. Stent thrombosis and stent restenosis were found to present as STEMI regardless of the diagnosis at first catheterization. Those with a bare metal stent were found to have a higher risk of ST/ISRS compared to those with a drug-eluting stent (DES). Among the cardiovascular risk factors, we determined that patients who had dyslipidemia (80%) presented the highest risk of having a re-catheterization, followed by those with hypertension or smoking (each 70%). No mortality was documented in the study population. Further research is warranted using accurate statistical analysis and a larger study population to determine the etiology and means of prevention of re-catheterization in the younger population.

2.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-886505

ABSTRACT

@#Objective    To analyze the causes and potential risk factors of re-catheterization after failure of no urinary catheter in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Methods    The clinical data of 1 618 patients without urinary catheter indwelling during the perioperative period of thoracic surgery in our hospital from 2013 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 791 males and 827 females, with a median age of 58 years, ranging from 27 to 85 years. And the risk factors for re-insertion after failure of urinary catheter were investgated. Results    The rate of catheter re-insertion was 1.5% (24/1 618). Compared with patients without re-insertion, patients with re-insertion had longer operation time [120.0 (95.0, 130.0) min vs. 120.0 (115.0, 180.0) min, P=0.015] and more intraoperative fluid infusion [800.0 (600.0, 1 100.0) mL vs. 1 150.0 (725.0, 1 350.0) mL, P=0.008]. Further multivariate analysis found that the operation time (OR=1.014, P=0.004, 95%CI 1.005-1.024) and intraoperative fluid infusion (OR=1.001, P=0.022, 95%CI 1.001–1.002) were independent risk factors for re-insertion. Conclusion    The rate of catheter re-insertion in lung cancer patients is relatively low, and conventional no placement of catheter is safe and feasible after lung cancer surgery. Increasing operation time or intraoperative infusion volume may increase the risk of catheter re-insertion after lung cancer surgery.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...