[Effect of frailty in health resource use in aged cancer patients]. / Efecto de la fragilidad en el consumo de recursos sanitarios en ancianos con cáncer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of frailty on health resource use in aged population with cancer. METHOD: Population-based cohort study with retrospective data collection and follow-up from January 2018 to December 2019 in people ≥65 years with cancer. RESULTS: Overall, 996 individuals were included, with a prevalence of frailty of 22.1%. Mortality at 2 years was 14.1% in the frail and 9.0% in the non-frail (p=0.028). Independently of age and sex, frailty increased the number of urgent hospitalizations (168%) and planned hospitalizations (64%), visits to the emergency room (111%), outpatient consultations (59%), day hospital sessions (30%) and visits to primary care (114%). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is more prevalent, determines a poorer prognostic and is associated with higher health resource use in aged population with cancer.

[Impact of a multicomponent program with nonpharmacological therapies for patients with chronic pain]. / Impacto de un programa multicomponente con terapias no farmacológicas para pacientes con dolor crónico.

INTRODUCTION: 25.9% of Spanish people suffer from chronic pain. An integrated, interdisciplinary approach is recommended, with pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies, involving patients in their self-care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and impact on resources of a program with non-pharmacological therapies in the control of non-oncological chronic pain in the short and medium term. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Quasi-experimental before-after study, follow-up 3-6 months, measuring: pain, well-being, quality of life, self-esteem, resilience, anxiety/depression (validated scales); patient-reported outcomes of workshop impact on pain management, habits and mood; ED and office visits; drug consumption and employment status. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two patients completed the program; 131 (92.3%) were women, age: 56.0. Decreased: pain (scale 0-10) (start: 6.0; end of workshop: 4.0; 3 months: 5.0); anxiety (12.9; 10.4; 8.8) and depression (12.3; 7.23; 6.47) (scales 0-21). They increased: well-being (scale 0-10) (4.0; 6.0; 4.0); quality of life (scale 0-1) (0.418; 0.580; 0.536); health status (scale 0-100) (47.5; 60.0; 60.0); self-esteem (scale 9-36) (24.1; 27.5; 26.7); resilience (scale 6-30) (14.8; 17.4; 18.6). Patient-reported outcomes were performed by 136 patients at the end of the workshop and 79 at 3 months: pain decreased (end of program: 104, 76.5%; 3 months: 66, 83.5%); medication decreased (96, 76.2%; 60, 78.9%); habits improved (112, 88.2%; 69, 90.8%). Forty patients (37.4%) reduced visits to the emergency room, 40 (37.4%) reduced scheduled visits. Overall satisfaction: 9.8 out of 10. CONCLUSIONS: Patients learn to mitigate their pain, participate in their self-care and improve their quality of life, self-esteem and emotional state. The effects remained for 3-6 months.

Efecto de la fragilidad en el consumo de recursos sanitarios en ancianos con cáncer / Effect of frailty in health resource use in aged cancer patients

Objetivo Evaluar el efecto de la fragilidad en el consumo de recursos sanitarios en población anciana con cáncer. Método Estudio de cohortes de base poblacional con recogida retrospectiva y seguimiento de enero de 2018 a diciembre de 2019 en personas ≥65 años con cáncer. Resultados Se incluyeron 996 sujetos, con una prevalencia de fragilidad del 22,1%. La mortalidad a los 2 años fue del 14,1% en los frágiles y del 9,0% en los no frágiles (p = 0,028). Independientemente de la edad y del sexo, la fragilidad aumentó el número de hospitalizaciones urgentes (168%) y programadas (64%), las visitas a urgencias (111%), las consultas externas (59%), las sesiones de hospital de día (30%) y las visitas a atención primaria (114%). Conclusiones La fragilidad es más prevalente, condiciona un peor pronóstico y se asocia a un mayor consumo de recursos sanitarios en los ancianos con cáncer. (AU)

Objective To evaluate the effect of frailty on health resource use in aged population with cancer. Method Population-based cohort study with retrospective data collection and follow-up from January 2018 to December 2019 in people ≥65 years with cancer. Results Overall, 996 individuals were included, with a prevalence of frailty of 22.1%. Mortality at 2 years was 14.1% in the frail and 9.0% in the non-frail (p = 0.028). Independently of age and sex, frailty increased the number of urgent hospitalizations (168%) and planned hospitalizations (64%), visits to the emergency room (111%), outpatient consultations (59%), day hospital sessions (30%) and visits to primary care (114%). Conclusions Frailty is more prevalent, determines a poorer prognostic and is associated with higher health resource use in aged population with cancer. (AU)

Impacto de la fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo en el consumo de recursos, los costes y el pronóstico en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca / Differences in clinical outcomes, health care resource utilization and costs in heart failure patients according to left ventricular ejection fraction

Introducción y objetivos: No se conoce bien el impacto de la fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) en el coste y la utilización de recursos sanitarios (URS) en la insuficiencia cardiaca (IC). El objetivo de nuestro trabajo es comparar el consumo de costes, la URS y el pronóstico según grupos de FEVI. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo que incluyó a todos los pacientes con diagnóstico principal de IC en urgencias o en una hospitalización en un centro terciario español durante 2018. Se excluyó la IC de nuevo diagnóstico. Se compararon los resultados clínicos, los costes y la URS según la FEVI (reducida [IC-FEr], ligeramente reducida [IC-FElr] y conservada [IC-FEc]) a 1 año. Resultados: De 1.287 pacientes con diagnóstico de IC en urgencias, 365 (28,4%) fueron dados de alta (grupo de urgencias [GU]) y 919 (71,4%), hospitalizados (GH). En total, 190 pacientes (14,7%) tenían IC-FEr; 146 (11,4%), IC-FElr y 951 (73,9%), IC-FEc. La media de edad fue 80,1±10,7 años, y el 57,1% eran mujeres. La mediana [intervalo intercuartílico] del coste por paciente-año fue de 1.889 [259-6.269] euros en el GU y 5.008 [2.747-9.589] euros en el GH (p <0,001). Los pacientes con IC-FEr del GU sufrieron más hospitalizaciones. El coste de la IC-FEr por paciente-año fue superior en ambos grupos: en el GU, 4.763 [2.076-17.155] euros con IC-FEr frente a 3.900 [590-8.013] euros con IC-FElr frente a 3.812 [259-5.486] euros con IC-FEc; en el GH, 6.321 [3.335-796] frente a 6.170 [3.189-10.484] frente a 4.636 [2.609-8.977] euros respectivamente; todos, p <0,001). Esta diferencia se debió a que los pacientes con IC-FEr ingresaron con mayor frecuencia en unidades de cuidados críticos y recibieron más pruebas diagnóstico-terapéuticas. Conclusiones: La FEVI influye significativamente en los costes y URS en la IC. Los pacientes con IC-FEr, especialmente los hospitalizados, concentran un mayor coste que aquellos con IC-FEc.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on health care resource utilization (HCRU) and cost in heart failure (HF) patients is not well known. We aimed to compare outcomes, HCRUs and costs according to LVEF groups. Methods: Retrospective, observational study of all patients with an emergency department (ED) visit or admission to a tertiary hospital in Spain 2018 with a primary HF diagnosis. We excluded patients with newly diagnosed heart failure. One-year clinical outcomes, costs and HCRUs were compared according to LVEF (reduced [HFrEF], mildly reduced [HFmrEF], and preserved [HFpEF]). Results: Among 1287 patients with a primary diagnosis of HF in the ED, 365 (28.4%) were discharged to home (ED group), and 919 (71.4%) were hospitalized (hospital group [HG]). In total, 190 patients (14.7%) had HFrEF, 146 (11.4%) HFmrEF, and 951 (73.9%) HFpEF. The mean age was 80.1±10.7 years; 57.1% were female. The median [interquartile range] of costs per patient/y was €1889 [259-6269] in the ED group and €5008 [2747-9589] in the HG (P <.001). Hospitalization rates were higher in patients with HFrEF in the ED group. The median costs of HFrEF per patient/y were higher in patients in both groups: €4763 [2076-17 155] vs €3900 [590-8013] for HFmrEF vs €3812 [259-5486] for HFpEF in the ED group, and €6321 [3335-796] vs €6170 [3189-10484] vs €4636 [2609-8977], respectively, in the hospital group (all P <.001). This difference was driven by the more frequent admission to intensive care units, and greater use of diagnostic and therapeutic tests among HFrEF patients. Conclusions: In HF, LVEF significantly impacts costs and HCRU. Costs were higher in patients with HFrEF, especially those requiring hospitalization, than in those with HFpEF.(AU)

[Type 2 diabetes in Andalusia: Resources use and economic cost]. / Diabetes tipo 2 en Andalucía: uso de recursos y coste económico.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies that quantify the cost of type 2 diabetes (DM2) show very different results. We set out to define the profile of the patient with DM2 in Andalusia, analyze the use of health resources and quantify their economic cost during 2022. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multicenter, cross-sectional and descriptive study. Three hundred and eighty-five patients with DM2 from Andalusia (confidence level: 95%; error: 5%). DATA ANALYZED: age, sex, attendance at primary care (PC), nursing, emergency and hospital specialty consultations; consumption of drugs in general and antidiabetics in particular, blood glucose strips, complementary tests and hospitalization days. RESULTS: Mean age: 70.7 ± 12.44 years; 53.6% men. Care contacts: PC physician: 8.36 ± 4.69; nursing: 7.17 ± 12; hospital visits: 2.31 ± 2.38; emergencies: 1.71 ± 2.89; hospitalization days: 2.26 ± 6.46. LABORATORY TESTS: 3.79 ± 5.45 and 2.17 ± 3.47 Rx. Drugs consumed: 9.20 ± 3.94 (1.76 ± 0.90 antidiabetics). Blood glucose strips: 184 ± 488. Annual cost: 5171.05 €/patient/year (2228.36 € for hospital admissions, 1702.87 € for drugs and 1239.82 € for assistance and complementary tests). CONCLUSIONS: The DM2 Andalusian is 71 years old, consumes 10 different drugs and treats DM2 with double therapy. He has been 20 attendances/year (75% in PC), 4 analyses, 2 X-rays and requires 2 days of hospitalization. Direct healthcare costs goes over 5000 €/year. This represents 41.66% of the budget of the Andalusian Ministry of Health and triples the average cost per habitant.

Differences in clinical outcomes, health care resource utilization and costs in heart failure patients according to left ventricular ejection fraction.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on health care resource utilization (HCRU) and cost in heart failure (HF) patients is not well known. We aimed to compare outcomes, HCRUs and costs according to LVEF groups. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study of all patients with an emergency department (ED) visit or admission to a tertiary hospital in Spain 2018 with a primary HF diagnosis. We excluded patients with newly diagnosed heart failure. One-year clinical outcomes, costs and HCRUs were compared according to LVEF (reduced [HFrEF], mildly reduced [HFmrEF], and preserved [HFpEF]). RESULTS: Among 1287 patients with a primary diagnosis of HF in the ED, 365 (28.4%) were discharged to home (ED group), and 919 (71.4%) were hospitalized (hospital group [HG]). In total, 190 patients (14.7%) had HFrEF, 146 (11.4%) HFmrEF, and 951 (73.9%) HFpEF. The mean age was 80.1±10.7 years; 57.1% were female. The median [interquartile range] of costs per patient/y was €1889 [259-6269] in the ED group and €5008 [2747-9589] in the HG (P <.001). Hospitalization rates were higher in patients with HFrEF in the ED group. The median costs of HFrEF per patient/y were higher in patients in both groups: €4763 [2076-17 155] vs €3900 [590-8013] for HFmrEF vs €3812 [259-5486] for HFpEF in the ED group, and €6321 [3335-796] vs €6170 [3189-10484] vs €4636 [2609-8977], respectively, in the hospital group (all P <.001). This difference was driven by the more frequent admission to intensive care units, and greater use of diagnostic and therapeutic tests among HFrEF patients. CONCLUSIONS: In HF, LVEF significantly impacts costs and HCRU. Costs were higher in patients with HFrEF, especially those requiring hospitalization, than in those with HFpEF.

Thyroid carcinoma in elderly people: Characterization using big data tools.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical-histological data associated comorbidities and the use of health resources of elderly patients with thyroid cancer. METHODS: An observational, retrospective study was carried out using data from the electronic medical record (EMR) of the Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (Madrid, Spain). The information was extracted using artificial intelligence techniques and analysed using the Savana Manager 3.0 software. We differentiated between younger people (0-59 years) and older people (60 or more years) and, within this latter group, between people of advanced age (60-74 years) and elderly people (75 or more years). RESULTS: Of a total of 509,517 patients, 1781 (0.35%) were diagnosed with thyroid cancer. Compared to younger patients, older patients presented a lower proportion of papillary carcinoma (64.2% vs. 75.3%) as well as a higher proportion of follicular carcinoma (9.3% vs. 5.0%) and other histological types (26.5% vs. 19.7%; p < 0.001). Young people with thyroid cancer exhibited prevalences of risk factors and most of the cardiovascular diseases studied significantly higher than those found in the general population. Elderly patients, compared with those of advanced age, showed greater comorbidity. However, a trend towards a lower consumption of healthcare resources was observed when elderly patients were compared with those of advanced age. CONCLUSION: The clinical characteristics, comorbidities and consumption of health resources of patients with thyroid cancer vary markedly with age. Elderly patients are characterized by a high burden of comorbidities that is not accompanied by a notable increase in their consumption of health resources.

Recursos y estrategias para optimizar el manejo de los pacientes con artritis psoriásica: proyecto CREA / Strategies and resources to optimise the management of Psoriatic Arthritis patients: the CREA Project

Antecedentes y objetivo: La artritis psoriásica (APs) es una enfermedad inflamatoria crónica mediada por el sistema inmune que afecta al sistema musculoesquelético y la piel, y se manifiesta de forma heterogénea y con un curso variable. En la práctica clínica habitual se ha observado variabilidad y limitaciones en su seguimiento. El objetivo del proyecto CREA fue consensuar estrategias de mejora para la valoración inicial y el seguimiento de los pacientes con APs en España. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una encuesta a una muestra representativa de reumatólogos expertos del territorio español, que contenía 33 preguntas sobre la práctica clínica habitual, los recursos disponibles y las limitaciones actuales en el seguimiento de los pacientes con APs. Se discutieron los resultados en reuniones regionales y se propusieron 105 estrategias que, finalmente, fueron valoradas por 85 expertos en un consenso Delphi. Resultados: Las limitaciones destacadas en el seguimiento de la APs fueron la falta de tiempo en consulta, de personal de enfermería, y el retraso en la realización de pruebas de imagen. Se propusieron 108 estrategias relacionadas con la evaluación de los índices de calidad de vida e impacto de la enfermedad; las comorbilidades y las manifestaciones extraarticulares; las pruebas de laboratorio; las pruebas de imagen; la exploración física y metrología y los índices de actividad y función. Entre todas, 53 se consideraron altamente aconsejables, sin diferencias regionales en los valores de consenso. Discusión y conclusiones: Las propuestas ofrecidas en el estudio actual son aplicables a todo el territorio nacional, responden a las necesidades no cubiertas detectadas en la encuesta inicial, conforman un cuadro de actuación mínimo y aseguran un seguimiento óptimo de los pacientes con APs.(AU)

Background and aim: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease that affects the musculoskeletal system and skin, and manifests heterogeneously, with a variable course. In current clinical practice, variability and limitations in its follow-up have been observed. The aim of the CREA project was to agree on strategies to improve the initial assessment and follow-up of patients with PsA in Spain. Materials and methods: A survey was conducted among a representative sample of expert rheumatologists in Spain, containing 33 questions on current clinical practice, available resources, and current limitations in the follow-up of patients with PsA. The results were discussed in regional meetings and 105 strategies were proposed and finally evaluated by 85 experts in a Delphi consensus. Results: The most important limitations in the follow-up of PsA were lack of consultation time, lack of nursing staff, and delays in performing imaging tests. A total of 108 strategies were proposed related to the assessment of quality of life and disease-impact indices; comorbidities and extra-articular manifestations; laboratory tests; imaging tests; physical examination and metrology; and activity and function indices. Of the total, 53 were considered highly advisable, with no regional differences in consensus values. Discussion and conclusions: The proposals offered in the current study are applicable to the entire country, respond to the unmet needs detected in the initial survey, form a minimum action framework, and ensure optimal follow-up of patients with PsA.(AU)

Strategies and resources to optimise the management of Psoriatic Arthritis patients: The CREA Project.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease that affects the musculoskeletal system and skin, and manifests heterogeneously, with a variable course. In current clinical practice, variability and limitations in its follow-up have been observed. The aim of the CREA project was to agree on strategies to improve the initial assessment and follow-up of patients with PsA in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was conducted among a representative sample of expert rheumatologists in Spain, containing 33 questions on current clinical practice, available resources, and current limitations in the follow-up of patients with PsA. The results were discussed in regional meetings and 105 strategies were proposed and finally evaluated by 85 experts in a Delphi consensus. RESULTS: The most important limitations in the follow-up of PsA were lack of consultation time, lack of nursing staff, and delays in performing imaging tests. A total of 108 strategies were proposed related to the assessment of quality of life and disease-impact indices; comorbidities and extra-articular manifestations; laboratory tests; imaging tests; physical examination and metrology; and activity and function indices. Of the total, 53 were considered highly advisable, with no regional differences in consensus values. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The proposals offered in the current study are applicable to the entire country, respond to the unmet needs detected in the initial survey, form a minimum action framework, and ensure optimal follow-up of patients with PsA.

Burden of heart failure in primary healthcare / Impacto de la insuficiencia cardíaca en la atención primaria

Objectives: To determine the epidemiology of heart failure registered in primary healthcare clinical records in Catalunya, Spain, between 2010 and 2014, focusing on incidence, mortality, and resource utilization. Design: Retrospective observational cohort study. Setting: Study was carried out in primary care setting. Participants and interventions: Patients registered as presenting a new heart failure diagnosis. The inclusion period ran from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2013, but patients were followed until 31st December 2013 in order to analyze mortality. Main measures: Information came from electronic medical records. Results: A total of 64441 patients were registered with a new diagnosis of heart failure (2.76 new cases per 1000 persons-year). Among them, 85.8% were ≥65 years. The number of cases/1000 persons-year was higher in men in all age groups. Incidence ranged from 0.04 in women <45 years to 27.61 in the oldest group, and from 0.08 in men <45 years to 28.52 in the oldest group. Mortality occurred in 16305 (25.3%) patients. Primary healthcare resource utilization increased after the occurrence of heart failure, especially the number of visits made by nurses to the patients’ homes. Conclusion: Heart failure incidence increases with age, is greater in men, and remains stable. Mortality continues to be high in newly diagnosed patients in spite of the current improvements in treatment. Home visits represent the greatest cost for the management of this disease in primary care setting.(AU)

Objetivo: Determinar la epidemiología de la insuficiencia cardíaca registrada en las historias clínicas de atención primaria en Cataluña, España, entre 2010 y 2014, centrándose en la incidencia, la mortalidad y la utilización de recursos sanitarios. Diseño: Estudio de cohorte observacional retrospectivo. Emplazamiento: El estudio se llevó a cabo en atención primaria. Participantes e intervenciones: Pacientes registrados con nuevo diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardíaca en el período de estudio. El período de inclusión fue del 1 de enero de 2010 al 31 de diciembre de 2013, pero los pacientes se siguieron hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2014 para poder determinar la mortalidad. Mediciones principales: La información se obtuvo de la historia clínica electrónica de los participantes. Resultados: Se registraron un total de 64.441 pacientes con nuevo diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardíaca (2,76 nuevos casos/1000 personas-año). De ellos, el 85,8% tenían ≥65 años. El número de casos/1000 personas-año fue mayor en hombres en todos los grupos de edad. La incidencia varió de 0,04 en mujeres <45 años a 27,61 en el grupo de mayor edad, y de 0,08 en hombres <45 años a 28,52 en el grupo de mayor edad. La mortalidad se produjo en 16.305 (25,3%) pacientes. La utilización de los recursos de atención primaria aumentó tras el diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardíaca, especialmente el número de visitas realizadas por las enfermeras a los pacientes en su domicilio. Conclusión: La incidencia de insuficiencia cardíaca aumenta con la edad, es mayor en hombres y se mantiene estable en el tiempo. La mortalidad continúa siendo alta en pacientes recién diagnosticados a pesar de las mejoras actuales en el tratamiento. Las visitas domiciliarias representan el mayor coste para el manejo de esta enfermedad en el ámbito de atención primaria.(AU)

[Prioritization of health resources in contexts of scarcity. SESPAS Report 2022]. / Priorización de recursos sanitarios en contextos de escasez. Informe SESPAS 2022.

The COVID-19 pandemic has been a clinical challenge, but also a legal and bioethical one. These three fundamental pillars are developed in the approach to prioritizing health resources in pandemic, clinical criteria, corresponding legal framework and applicable ethical principles. Initially, clinical criteria were applied to identify patients with the best survival prognosis, combining a clinical evaluation and the use of short-term and long-term prognostic variables. But the decision to prioritize the care of one patient over another has a legal-political burden, which poses a risk of falling into discrimination since fundamental rights are at stake. The prioritization criteria must be based on principles that reflect as a vehicle philosophy that which we have constitutionally assumed as a social and democratic State of Law, which did not respond to utilitarianism but to personalism. Any philosophy of resource distribution must bear in mind the scientific and constitutional perspective and, with them, those of fundamental rights and bioethical principles. In the prioritization of resources, ethical principles must be consolidated such as respect for the human dignity, the principle of necessity (equal need, equal access to the resource), the principle of equity (which advises prioritizing the most vulnerable population groups), transparency (fundamental in society's trust) and the principle of reciprocity (which requires protecting the sectors of the population that take more risks), among others.

Burden of heart failure in primary healthcare.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the epidemiology of heart failure registered in primary healthcare clinical records in Catalunya, Spain, between 2010 and 2014, focusing on incidence, mortality, and resource utilization. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Study was carried out in primary care setting. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Patients registered as presenting a new heart failure diagnosis. The inclusion period ran from 1st January 2010 to 31st December 2013, but patients were followed until 31st December 2013 in order to analyze mortality. MAIN MEASURES: Information came from electronic medical records. RESULTS: A total of 64441 patients were registered with a new diagnosis of heart failure (2.76 new cases per 1000 persons-year). Among them, 85.8% were ≥65 years. The number of cases/1000 persons-year was higher in men in all age groups. Incidence ranged from 0.04 in women <45 years to 27.61 in the oldest group, and from 0.08 in men <45 years to 28.52 in the oldest group. Mortality occurred in 16305 (25.3%) patients. Primary healthcare resource utilization increased after the occurrence of heart failure, especially the number of visits made by nurses to the patients' homes. CONCLUSION: Heart failure incidence increases with age, is greater in men, and remains stable. Mortality continues to be high in newly diagnosed patients in spite of the current improvements in treatment. Home visits represent the greatest cost for the management of this disease in primary care setting.

Inicio de un nuevo programa de cuidados paliativos pediátricos en un hospital general: características de la población y uso de recursos / Starting of a new pediatric palliative care program in a general hospital: characteristics of the population and use of resources

Se describen las características de los pacientes susceptibles de cuidados paliativos pediátricos (CPP) de un hospital de segundo nivel, así como la frecuencia de visitas a urgencias, de ingresos y de dispositivos tecnológicos empleados. Estudio retrospectivo de los pacientes atendidos desde el inicio del programa de CPP (enero 2017 a enero 2020) en un hospital de nivel secundario. Se incluyeron 29 niños, 58,6% varones y edad media a la entrada en el estudio de 2,3 años (DE: 2,4); el 44,8% procedían del ámbito rural. El 41% presentaron multimorbilidad, con mayor frecuencia de patología neurológica. La causa más frecuente de atención en urgencias (n = 360) y hospitalización (n = 145) fue la infeccioso-respiratoria. El 51,7% de los pacientes eran dependientes de dispositivos médicos. Conocer el uso de recursos de esta población puede ayudar a un mejor reparto de los mismos para poder ofrecer CPP con independencia del lugar de residencia.(AU)

This article sets out to describe the characteristics of patients at a second-level hospital who are likely to receive pediatric palliative care (PPC), the frequency of visits to the emergency room, admissions and technological devices used. A retrospective study was carried out of the patients who received care from the start of the PPC program (January 2017 to January 2020) at a secondary-level hospital. Twenty-nine patients were included, 58.6% male with mean age at entry into the study of 2.3 years (SD: 2.4); 44.8% of them were from rural areas. The prevalence of multimorbidity was 41%, with a higher frequency of neurological pathology. Respiratory infection was the most frequent cause of emergency care (n = 360) and hospitalization (n=145). Half of patients (51.7%) depended on medical devices. Better knowledge of the resources used by this population can lead to more effective distribution/management that in turn can enable PPC to be offered regardless of the place of residence.(AU)

Relación entre la utilización de recursos sanitarios y aspectos socioeconómicos en Atención Primaria / Relationship between the use of health resources and psychosocioeconomic aspects in Primary Care

Introducción: estudiar la influencia de los factores socioeconómicos y psicológicos familiares en la demanda y utilización de recursos sanitarios en las consultas pediátricas de Atención Primaria (AP). Material y métodos: estudio descriptivo observacional realizado mediante cuestionarios recogidos, durante un periodo de 1 año a familias de niños entre 1 mes y 14 años de edad pertenecientes a 2 consultas urbanas de AP de Madrid. Se analizaron datos crudos, comparaciones entre grupos y análisis multivariante. Resultados: se analizaron 434 cuestionarios. El número de consultas totales fue mayor en los pacientes de menor edad (p = 0,001) y en aquellos cuyos padres presentaban elevado nivel de ansiedad (p = 0,001). Las familias con todos sus miembros en paro presentaron niveles de ansiedad (odds ratio [OR]: 5,85; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95]: 2,56 a 13,34; p <0,0001) y depresión (OR: 6,25; IC 95: 2,64 a 14,76; p <0,0001) significativamente superiores al resto. La realización de pruebas de laboratorio fue superior en los niños con enfermedad crónica (OR: 3,84; IC 95: 2,09 a 7,07; p <0,0001) y en aquellos con un nivel de ansiedad elevado en los padres (OR: 2,78; IC 95: 1,46 a 5,28); p = 0,02). La toma de fármacos fue superior en los niños con enfermedad crónica (OR: 3,15; IC 95: 1,60 a 6,19; p = 0,001) y menor en los niños de más edad (OR: 0,93; IC 95: 0,87 a 0,98; p = 0,014). Conclusiones: la frecuentación y el consumo de fármacos en general y antibióticos en particular, así como la solicitud de pruebas diagnósticas de laboratorio e imagen están directamente relacionados con el nivel elevado de ansiedad o depresión en los padres y con la presencia de enfermedad crónica en los niños e inversamente con la edad de los mismos. Sería recomendable la detección e intervención en los casos de elevada ansiedad parental para intentar reducir el consumo de recursos sanitarios (AU)

Introduction: the aim of our study was to analyse the influence of family socioeconomic and psychological factors on the demand and use of health resources in paediatric consultations in Primary Care.Methods: descriptive observational study carried out using questionnaires collected over a period of 1 year. Questionnaires were collected from children between 1 month and 14 years old, belonging to 2 urban Primary Care clinics in Madrid. The raw data was analysed, and comparisons between groups and multivariate analysis were performed.Results: we compared 434 questionnaires. The number of total consultations was higher in younger patients (p = 0.001) and in those whose parents presented high levels of anxiety (p = 0.001). Families with all their members in unemployed presented anxiety (OR: 5.85; IC 95: 2.567-13.341; p <0.0001) and depression (OR: 6.250; IC 95: 2.647-14.760; p <0.0001) levels higher than the rest. Laboratory and imaging test were higher in children with chronic disease (OR: 3.84; IC 95: 2.09-7.07; p <0.0001) and high level of anxiety in parents (OR: 2.78; IC 95: 1.46-5.28; p = 0.02). Drugs use was higher in children with chronic disease (OR: 3.15; IC 95: 1.60-6.19; p = 0.001) and lower in older children (OR: 0.927; IC 95: 0.87-0.98; p = 0.014).Conclusions: hyper-attendance and drug consumption in general and antibiotics in particular, as well as the request for imaging and laboratory test, is directly related to the high level of anxiety in the parents and the presence of chronic disease in children and inversely with the age. It would be advisable to detect and, if possible, intervene in cases of high parental anxiety in order to try to reduce the consumption of health resources. (AU)

COVID-19: Adaptation of a model to predicting healthcare resources needs in Valle del Cauca, Colombia / COVID-19: Predicción de las necesidades de recursos sanitarios en el Valle del Cauca, Colombia

Abstract Background: Valle del Cauca is the region with the fourth-highest number of COVID-19 cases in Colombia (>50,000 on September 7, 2020). Due to the lack of anti-COVID-19 therapies, decision-makers require timely and accurate data to estimate the incidence of disease and the availability of hospital resources to contain the pandemic. Methods: We adapted an existing model to the local context to forecast COVID-19 incidence and hospital resource use assuming different scenarios: (1) the implementation of quarantine from September 1st to October 15th (average daily growth rate of 2%); (2-3) partial restrictions (at 4% and 8% growth rates); and (4) no restrictions, assuming a 10% growth rate. Previous scenarios with predictions from June to August were also presented. We estimated the number of new cases, diagnostic tests required, and the number of available hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) beds (with and without ventilators) for each scenario. Results: We estimated 67,700 cases by October 15th when assuming the implementation of a quarantine, 80,400 and 101,500 cases when assuming partial restrictions at 4% and 8% infection rates, respectively, and 208,500 with no restrictions. According to different scenarios, the estimated demand for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests ranged from 202,000 to 1,610,600 between September 1st and October 15th. The model predicted depletion of hospital and ICU beds by September 20th if all restrictions were to be lifted and the infection growth rate increased to 10%. Conclusion: Slowly lifting social distancing restrictions and reopening the economy is not expected to result in full resource depletion by October if the daily growth rate is maintained below 8%. Increasing the number of available beds provides a safeguard against slightly higher infection rates. Predictive models can be iteratively used to obtain nuanced predictions to aid decision-making

Resumen Introducción: Valle del Cauca es el departamento con el cuarto mayor número de casos de COVID-19 en Colombia (>50,000 en septiembre 7, 2020). Debido a la ausencia de tratamientos efectivos para COVID-19, los tomadores de decisiones requieren de acceso a información actualizada para estimar la incidencia de la enfermedad, y la disponibilidad de recursos hospitalarios para contener la pandemia. Métodos: Adaptamos un modelo existente al contexto local para estimar la incidencia de COVID-19, y la demanda de recursos hospitalarios en los próximos meses. Para ello, modelamos cuatro escenarios hipotéticos: (1) el gobierno local implementa una cuarentena desde el primero de septiembre hasta el 15 de octubre (asumiendo una tasa promedio de infecciones diarias del 2%); (2-3) se implementan restricciones parciales (tasas de infección del 4% y 8%); (4) se levantan todas las restricciones (tasa del 10%). Los mismos escenarios fueron previamente evaluados entre julio y agosto, y los resultados fueron resumidos. Estimamos el número de casos nuevos, el número de pruebas diagnósticas requeridas, y el numero de camas de hospital y de unidad de cuidados intensivos (con y sin ventilación) disponibles, para cada escenario. Resultados: El modelo estimó 67,700 casos a octubre 15 al asumir la implementación de una nueva cuarentena, 80,400 y 101,500 al asumir restricciones parciales al 4 y 8% de infecciones diarias, respectivamente, y 208,500 al asumir ninguna restricción. La demanda por pruebas diagnósticas (de reacción en cadena de la polimerasa) fue estimada entre 202,000 y 1,610,600 entre septiembre 1 y octubre 15, a través de los diferentes escenarios evaluados. El modelo estimó un agotamiento de camas de cuidados intensivos para septiembre 20 al asumir una tasa de infecciones del 10%. Conclusión: Se estima que el levantamiento paulatino de las restricciones de distanciamiento social y la reapertura de la economía no debería causar el agotamiento de recursos hospitalarios si la tasa de infección diaria se mantiene por debajo del 8%. Sin embargo, incrementar la disponibilidad de camas permitiría al sistema de salud ajustarse rápidamente a potenciales picos inesperados de infecciones nuevas. Los modelos de predicción deben ser utilizados de manera iterativa para depurar las predicciones epidemiológicas y para proveer a los tomadores de decisiones con información actualizada.

A retrospective and prospective 12-month observational study of the socioeconomic burden of moderate to severe irritable bowel syndrome with constipation in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: The socioeconomic burden of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) has never been formally assessed in Spain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This 12-month (6-month retrospective and prospective periods) observational, multicentre study assessed the burden of moderate-to-severe IBS-C in Spain. Patients were included if they had been diagnosed with IBS-C (Rome III criteria) within the last 5 years and had moderate-to-severe IBS-C (IBS Symptom Severity Scale score [IBS-SSS] ≥175) at inclusion. The primary objective was to assess the direct cost to the Spanish healthcare system (HS). RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included, 64 (57%) of which had severe IBS-C at inclusion. At baseline, 89 (80%) patients reported abdominal pain and distention. Patient quality of life (QoL), measured by the IBS-C QoL and EQ-5D instruments, was found to be impaired with a mean score of 59 and 57 (0-100, worst-best), respectively. Over the 6-month prospective period the mean IBS-C severity, measured using the IBS-SSS showed some improvement (315-234 [0-500, best-worst]). During the year, 89 (80%) patients used prescription drugs for IBS-C, with laxatives being the most frequently prescribed (n=70; 63%). The direct cost to the HS was €1067, and to the patient was €568 per year. The total direct cost for moderate-to-severe IBS-C was €1635. DISCUSSION: The majority of patients reported continuous IBS-C symptoms despite that 80% were taking medication to treat their IBS-C. Overall healthcare resource use and direct costs were asymmetric, with a small group of patients consuming the majority of resources.

[Available resources for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations in Spain]. / Recursos disponibles para el manejo de la agudización de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica en España.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (COPDE) lead to a high use of healthcare resources. This study assesses the healthcare and organisational resources of Spanish health care centres for the management of COPDE at different care levels (Primary Care (PC), Respiratory Diseases, Internal Medicine, and Emergency Departments), and compare with current recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational study was carried out through telephone interviews to General Practitioners, Chest Diseases, Internal Medicine, and Emergency Department doctors. RESULTS: A total of 284 doctors were interviewed. According to their responses, at PC centres there is a high availability of pulse oximetry (98.9%) and electrocardiograph (100%), and a low availability of Chest X-Ray (19.1%), or urgent laboratory tests (17.0%) in sites. In hospital wards, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) availability was 76.1%, with only a 69.7% of nursing staff properly trained in its use. Respiratory intermediate care units (RICUs) were available in 18.3% of public hospitals versus 41.7% of private hospitals. Specific training for COPDE management was received by 47.9% of Emergency Department doctors in the previous year. Only 31.9% of PC centres had specific protocols for referring patients to specialists. More than 35% of PC centres and hospitals do not have their electronic medical records integrated with other healthcare levels. CONCLUSIONS: In general terms, there are sufficient resources available in Spanish healthcare centres. However, several areas of improvement were identified, such as an insufficient level of electronic medical record integration between healthcare levels, limited implementation of RICUs in public hospitals, and deficiencies related to specific training in NIV management.

[Training, the key to improving eHealth literacy of upper secondary school students]. / Formación, la clave para mejorar las competencias informacionales en e-salud del alumnado de bachillerato.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether training on strategies to identify and assess health-related information online has a positive impact on students' perception of their own eHealth literacy. METHODS: The validated eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) was administered to a sample of upper secondary school students, aged 15-18. One week later, they attended a training session on how to search and identify reliable health-related information and resources online. The eHEALS was administered again at the end of this session. Information about gender and school year was collected in both sessions. Perceived eHealth literacy was assessed by comparing the scores obtained before and after the session. Bivariate and multiple linear regressions were completed. RESULTS: Of the 298 students enrolled in upper secondary school (Bachillerato), 285 were included in the study. Approximately 52.28% (149) were female, and 47.72% (136) were male. The mean eHEALS score before the session was 24.19 (range: 8-40), and was 28.54 after it. The training was associated with higher perceived eHealth literacy scores (p <0,0001). Health literacy was positively associated with the usefulness and importance students give the Internet. CONCLUSIONS: Attendance at a training session on strategies to identify and assess health-related resources online is associated with higher levels of perceived eHealth literacy. Implementing specific training sessions on eHealth literacy in upper secondary school is a promising approach for enhancing students' eHealth literacy.

[Influence of postcode on paediatric admissions in Seville]. / Influencia del código postal en las hospitalizaciones pediátricas en Sevilla.

INTRODUCTION: The postcode (where the home is situated) is an indicator of socioeconomic status and is associated with morbidity, mortality, and the use of health services. The aim of this study was to analyse its effects on paediatric admissions and to determine the rates of the most common causes of paediatric admissions in Seville. MATHERIAL AND METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study with two analysis units: under 15 year-old "admissions" in public hospitals in Seville (n=2,660) and "city districts" of Seville (n=11). The independent variable analysed was whether the postcode of the admitted patients was within a Regional Government designated "area with social transformation needs". The analysis of the admissions was performed using X2-test, Fisher test and Student-t test, with the description of rates using the calculation of crude and specific rates, and by rate ratio. RESULTS: Children living in districts with a lower socioeconomic status were on average 7 months younger (P<.001), and they were significantly more likely to be admitted via the emergency department (P<.001). There was no statistical difference detected in either the length of hospital stay or mortality. The crude admission rate ratio was higher in districts with a lower socioeconomic status (1.8), with a higher specific rate ratio detected in admissions due to asthma, respiratory infections, inguinal hernia, and epilepsy/convulsions. CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric hospital admission rates of the main diagnoses were higher in districts with a lower socioeconomic status. Children living in these districts were more likely to be admitted younger and via the emergency department.

[Health status, quality of life, and use of healthcare resources by patients with diabetes mellitus in Spain]. / Estado de salud, calidad de vida y utilización de recursos sanitarios de los pacientes con diabetes mellitus en España.

INTRODUCTION: This study analyses the health status of patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM), their health related quality of life (HRQoL) and their use of healthcare resources in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive analysis was conducted using the Spanish Health National Survey (ENSE, 2012), gathering data on those patients aged 15 and over diagnosed with DM. Their health status, their HRQoL, and their use of healthcare resources were systematically compared with those of patients diagnosed with other chronic conditions (OCC), as well as a population without DM (non-DM). RESULTS: Out of 21,007 subjects that took part, 7.4% were diagnosed with DM and 59% with OCC conditions (mean age 65.6±14.2 years with DM, 51.3±18.1 years with OCC, and 45.7±18.2 years with non-DM). When compared to non-DM and OCC, DM was statistically significantly associated with higher frequencies of hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, obesity, myocardial infraction, hospital admissions in the last year, and drug consumption, but with a lower number of visits to secondary healthcare. The mean quality adjusted life years (QALY) of patients with DM was 0.75 per year, significantly lower (P<.05) to that of individuals with OCC (0.89), and those without DM (0.92). The difference vs. non-DM remained statistically significant after adjusting for age, gender, and number of comorbidities (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, DM is associated with a high comorbidity, involves a greater loss in HRQoL than those diagnosed with other chronic conditions as a whole, and generates a significant burden on the healthcare system.