Malposition of an Internal Aortic Annuloplasty Ring After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair.

Poor tissue quality of adventitia and intima makes aortic root repair complex in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. The management of aortic root repair remains controversial. Internal aortic annuloplasty devices provide a standardized aortic valve repair technique to reduce and prevent annular dilation, while the modified Florida sleeve (mFS) procedure is an aortic root remodeling technique that does not require coronary artery reimplantation. However, little is known about the long-term durability of internal aortic annuloplasty with the hemispheric aortic annuloplasty remodeling ring (HARRT) combined with a mFS procedure in acute type A aortic dissection repair. A 52-year-old man had initial type A aortic dissection repair with an internal aortic annuloplasty ring and a mFS technique. He presented with dyspnea on exertion and intermittent chest pain one year later. Transesophageal echocardiogram revealed malposition of aortic annuloplasty ring and severe aortic insufficiency. He underwent a redo sternotomy with aortic valve replacement. Intraoperative findings demonstrated the aortic annuloplasty ring had dislodged from under the left and right coronary annulus and was adherent to the base of the noncoronary leaflet. The annuloplasty ring and aortic valve leaflets were excised and replaced with a mechanical aortic valve.

Challenges and strategies regarding anaesthetic management of twin pregnancy undergoing redo aortic valve replacement.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Redo aortic valve replacement in twin pregnancy presents significant challenges because of the elevated risks for both maternal and fetal health. Mortality rates range from 12 % to 21 % in specialised centres, with previous cardiac surgeries further elevating the risk. Pregnancy complicates cardiac surgery, with fetal mortality rates as high as 16-33 %. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 31-year-old woman, 15 weeks pregnant with twins and with a history of mechanical aortic valve replacement, presented with worsening breathlessness and grade III dyspnoea. Echocardiography revealed severe valve obstruction, necessitating redo-aortic valve replacement and posterior aortic root enlargement. Despite intraoperative challenges, including ventricular fibrillation and postoperative heart block, she underwent successful surgery and pacemaker implantation, with both mother and fetuses remaining stable. DISCUSSION: Optimal timing of surgery is crucial, considering fetal developmental vulnerability in the first trimester and maternal cardiac workload in the third trimester. Second-trimester risks are comparable to non-pregnant patients. A limited understanding of fetal-placental perfusion during bypass necessitates cautious management strategies, with emerging techniques like pulsatile perfusion showing promise. Anaesthesia selection prioritises fetal safety while monitoring fetal distress during surgery remains challenging. To achieve successful outcomes for both mother and babies in a twin pregnancy undergoing a redo aortic valve replacement, careful timing, appropriate surgical techniques, and meticulous perioperative care are essential. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary approach is crucial for managing twin pregnancy following redo aortic valve surgery. Careful planning, close monitoring, and specialised surgical and anaesthetic techniques are key to minimising risks to both mother and fetus.

Self-expandable transcatheter valve is a potentially useful option for a failing small surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve.

OBJECTIVE: Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation inside a failing surgical aortic valve bio-prosthesis has become an alternative for patients at high risk for redo surgical aortic valve replacement. However, the correlation between the size of the failing surgical aortic valve and the occurrence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after trans-catheter implantation is still controversial. The aim of this study is to analyze and report the results in Japanese patients. METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent trans-catheter aortic valve implantation inside a failing surgical aortic valve at our hospital were retrospectively reviewed with results from echocardiography and computed tomography. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 84.5 ± 4.8 years. The mean body surface area was 1.42 ± 0.13 m2. The cohort was divided into two groups according to the size of the failing bio-prosthesis: small (≦19 mm) and large (> 19 mm). There were no significant differences in mean pressure gradient (12.2 ± 4.0 mmHg vs. 11.1 ± 1.2 mmHg; p = 0.54) and effective orifice area index (1.00 ± 0.26 cm2/m2 vs. 0.99 ± 0.25 cm2/m2; p = 0.92) between the groups at 6 months after trans-catheter implantation. The incidence of moderate (38.5% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.59) and severe (0% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.33) prosthesis-patient mismatch was equivalent. There was no significant difference in survival between the two groups (log-rank test p-value = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Trans-catheter implantation inside a failing small aortic valve did not increase the frequency of prosthesis-patient mismatch in this Japanese cohort.

A case of freestyle valve reoperation 23 years after the first operation.

We present a case of redo stentless valve operation in a 73-year-old man who underwent aortic valve replacement via the subcoronary approach with a freestyle aortic bioprosthesis 23 years ago at our institution. He was referred for surgery because an echocardiogram showed severe aortic regurgitation due to structural valve deterioration, and aortic valve replacement was planned. Severe circumferential calcification and adhesion were noted during the surgery between the freestyle and native roots. Redo-aortic valve replacement was successful despite the technical difficulty. In stentless valve reoperations following aortic valve replacement via the subcoronary method, the planning of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation and sutureless valve implantation may be a practical and safe strategy.

Successful redo aortic valve replacement using Perceval for multiple recurrent prosthetic valve dysfunction.

A 50-year-old man who required aortic valve replacement (AVR) 3 times for severe paravalvular leakage (PVL) was diagnosed with a recurrence of severe PVL. Since the PVL recurred each time because of prosthetic valve detachment from the annulus, a fourth AVR was performed using a self-expanding sutureless valve. Postoperative echocardiography showed no significant PVL. The patient was discharged without any complications and returned to normal work soon after. In cases such as our patient, sutureless AVR could be a powerful alternative to conventional AVR.

Successful redo aortic valve replacement using Perceval valve in a patient with prosthetic valve endocarditis complicated by acute cerebral infarction.

INTRODUCTION: and importance: For treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), redo-aortic valve replacement (AVR) is usually required. However, the recurrence of PVE continues to be a serious problem that needs a solution. CASE PRESENTATION: An 83-year-old woman who had undergone AVR for aortic infective endocarditis 12 years ago was diagnosed with PVE complicated with acute cerebral infarction. Urgent redo-AVR was performed. After complete removal of the prosthesis, Perceval S valve was implanted successfully. There were no postoperative neurological deteriorations, and the echocardiogram showed no recurrence of PVE. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Theoretically, the fewer prostheses left in the heart, the lower the risk of PVE recurrence. CONCLUSION: In patients with PVE, redo-AVR using the Perceval valve may be a suitable option since Perceval reduces the prosthesis in the heart compared with conventional redo-AVR.

Meta-Analysis of Stroke and Mortality Rates in Patients Undergoing Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background During the past decade, the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was extended beyond treatment-naïve patients and implemented for treatment of degenerated surgical bioprosthetic valves. Selection criteria for either valve-in-valve (viv) TAVR or redo surgical aortic valve replacement are not well established, and decision making on the operative approach still remains challenging for the interdisciplinary heart team. Methods and Results This review was intended to analyze all studies on viv-TAVR focusing on short- and mid-term stroke and mortality rates compared with redo surgical aortic valve replacement or native TAVR procedures. A structured literature search and review process led to 1667 potentially relevant studies on July 1, 2020. Finally, 23 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. All references were case series either with or without propensity score matching and registry analyses. Quantitative synthesis of data from 8509 patients revealed that viv-TAVR is associated with mean 30-day stroke and mortality rates of 2.2% and 4.2%, respectively. Pooled data analysis showed no significant differences in 30-day stroke rate, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality between viv-TAVR and comparator treatment (native TAVR [n=11 804 patients] or redo surgical aortic valve replacement [n=498 patients]). Conclusions This review is the first one comparing the risk for stroke and mortality rates in viv-TAVR procedures with native TAVR approach and contributes substantial data for the clinical routine. Moreover, this systematic review is the most comprehensive analysis on ischemic cerebrovascular events and early mortality in patients undergoing viv-TAVR. In this era with increasing numbers of bioprosthetic valves used in younger patients, viv-TAVR is a suitable option for the treatment of degenerated bioprostheses.

A Case of Redo-Aortic Valve Replacement for a Lillehei-Kaster Valve Implanted 42 Years Ago / 日本心臓血管外科学会雑誌

We present a case of redo aortic valve replacement (AVR) in a 71-year-old man with a Lillehei-Kaster valve implanted 42 years prior. The patient initially underwent AVR and open mitral commissurotomy procedures for aortic regurgitation complicated with mitral stenosis in 1978 at the age of 29. Thereafter, he was followed at our outpatient clinic and treated without anticoagulant therapy for the initial two decades of the postoperative period. During the long-term follow-up, the mean pressure gradient remained between 40 and 60 mmHg and there were no adverse events noted before occurrence of heart failure triggered by tachycardia and pneumonia. Following improvement of heart failure, redo AVR was performed. There was no structural damage, thrombosis, or Lillehei-Kaster valve opening restrictions, though severe pannus growth on the left ventricle side was observed, which was thought to be the cause of the increased pressure gradient. This is the first known report of redo AVR after many years in a patient who underwent Lillehei-Kaster valve implantation. Furthermore, no other study has noted findings regarding pressure gradient change during the long-term follow-up period in such cases.

Solo Smart stentless bioprosthesis for redo aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: In the redo aortic valve replacement (AVR), removal of the previously implanted damaged prosthesis may result in a native aortic annulus defect, making it difficult to reimplant a stented prosthesis. The Solo Smart valve, a relatively new stentless bioprosthesis, is designed for the supra-annular implantation into the wall of the sinus of Valsalva and may be a useful alternative to redo-AVR. CASE REPORT: We report a successful case of redo-AVR using the Solo Smart valve. CONCLUSION: The unique feature of the Solo Smart valve is the supra-annular implantation procedure in the sinus of Valsalva without annular stitches. This bioprosthesis can be a useful alternative for redo-AVR in patients with a defect of the native aortic annulus.

Multicentre, propensity-matched study to evaluate long-term impact of implantation technique in isolated aortic valve replacement on mortality and incidence of redo surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Studies suggest that the use of semicontinuous suture (SC) technique increases the risk of redo valve surgery after aortic valve replacement (AVR). The objective of this study was to identify 30-day mortality, rate of redo operation and long-term outcomes after AVR using either a semicontinuous suture or interrupted suture (IS) technique. METHODS: A total of 1617 patients from 2 cardiothoracic centres, undergoing isolated AVR between April 2005 and August 2013 were included. AVR was performed using SC technique in 765 patients and IS technique in 852 patients. Data were collected prospectively and follow-up was obtained to date for all patients. We compared 30-day mortality, rate of redo operation and long-term mortality in SC and IS groups. One-to-one propensity-matching analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 22 to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: Four hundred and eleven patients in the SC group were matched to 411 patients in the IS group (total of 822 patients) using propensity-score matching. The baseline characteristics were similar between SC and IS groups after matching. There were no statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality (3.9 vs 2.7%; P = 0.328), long-term mortality at 9-year follow-up (14.4 vs 15.3%; log-rank = 0.524) or rate of redo surgery (2.9 vs 2.0%; P = 0.320) between SC and IS, respectively. However, shorter cross-clamp time (51.9 ± 15.2 vs 60.9 ± 17.6 min; P < 0.001), bypass time (71.3 ± 23.0 vs 81.3 ± 37.8 min; P < 0.001) and the use of larger valve sizes (23.4 ± 2.1 vs 21.9 ± 2.2 mm; P < 0.001) were observed in SC patients compared with IS patients. Multivariate analysis did not show the suture technique as a significant determinant of redo valve surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre study demonstrates that neither mortality nor the risk of redo surgery was influenced by the choice of implantation technique using semicontinuous vs interrupted suture techniques. The SC technique allowed shorter operations and larger size valves to be utilized.

Prosthetic valve endocarditis manifesting multiple huge aspergilloma / 대한내과학회지

Fungal prosthetic valve endocarditis is a rare, poo-prognostic disease. The risk factors for fungal valve endocardits are open heart surgery, hyperalimentation, antibiotic therapy, IV drug abuse, concomitant bacterial endocarditis and immunosuppression. We report a case of aspergillus endocarditis in the aortic valve, which extended to ascending aorta after Redo-aortic valve replacement surgery. A 22-year-old male patient underwent Redo-aortic valve replacement surgery with 23mm-sized Sorin valve(bi-leaflet tilting disc valve) due to prosthetic valve failure. He was readmitted because of development of cough, anorexia, fatigue and fever after operation. The results of repeated blood culture were negative, and the symptoms continued in spite of 2 week treatment with broad spectrum antibiotics. Echocardiography and spiral computed tomographic angiography revealed multiple, huge masses in the aortic valve extending to ascending aorta. Emergent surgery was performed. Infected valve and surrounding areas were widely excised and aortic homograft was inserted. Resected aorta and prosthetic valve showed multiple mass-forming vegetations, measuring up to 4cmx3cmx3cm. Microscopically, they revealed fungal organisms, showing sharp-angle branching and septate hyphae. Aspergillus flavus was isolated in culture of resected tissue. The patient suddenly died of ventricular fibrillation 3 weeks after surgery in spite of treatement with intravenous amphotericin B.