Academic Output of Fellows of the American Association for Respiratory Care.

BACKGROUND: Research is critical for the advancement of respiratory care. Fellows of the American Association for Respiratory Care (FAARCs) are nominated based on their significant contributions to the respiratory care profession. Research output is potentially an important component of qualification for FAARC. The purpose of this study is to report the academic output of respiratory therapist (RT) FAARCs. METHODS: We identified FAARCs from the AARC web site. Research output was assessed by searching the Scopus and PubMed databases. We collected total research documents, citations, h-index, co-authors, and document type. We compared those with only the FAARC designation with RTs who are fellows in both the Society of Critical Care Medicine (FCCMs) and FAARC. RESULTS: We identified a total of 371 RT FAARCs, 4 RT FCCMs, and 10 with both designations. FAARCs were 70% male, 22% had a doctorate, 37% had a master's, 13% had a bachelor's, and 29% did not have a degree reported. There were no differences in sex or highest degree between FAARCs and FCCMs. FAARCs had a total of 3,724 publications and 110,207 citations while those with both designations had 1,304 publications and 43,181 citations. In Scopus, 46% of FAARCs had no publications, and 27% had ≥ 10 publications; of those with both credentials, 10% had no publications, and 70% had ≥ 10 publications. FAARCs inducted in 1998 and 1999 had significantly (P < .001) more publications than other eras. Compared to those with both credentials, FAARCs had fewer median publications (1 vs 50), lower h-index (1 vs 18), and fewer citations (1 vs 1,486), P < .001 for all. Total publications in PubMed were lower, and differences in publications were similar. CONCLUSIONS: RT FAARCs had a large number of publications and citations, although nearly half did not have any publications. Those with both FAARC and FCCM had significantly more academic output per fellow, although there are only 10 individuals with both credentials.

Prevalence and sociodemographic factors of depression, anxiety and stress in Saudi Arabia: a survey of respiratory therapists.

Background: Depression, anxiety and stress are prevalent among healthcare providers but limited data is available regarding respiratory therapists (RTs). This study aimed to assess the prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress, and identify the associated sociodemographic factors among RTs in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to RTs in Saudi Arabia. Data were summarized using frequency and percentages. Stress, anxiety, and depression prevalence rates were expressed as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The associated factors of stress, anxiety, and depression were subjected to logistic regression. Results: Overall, 988 (91%) RTs, 661 (66.9%) males, completed the online survey. The prevalence (95% CI) of depression, anxiety and stress among RTs was 81.3% (0.787, 0.837), 89.6% (0.875, 0.914), and 45.5% (0.424, 0.487), respectively. RT staff who were ≥41 years old, divorced, widowed or separated, or had > 10 years of clinical experience were more likely to experience stress. RTs who were (divorced, widowed or separated), did not live with their family, were current smokers, or worked the night shift were more likely to experience anxiety. RTs who were (divorced, widowed or separated), were current smokers, had >10 years of clinical experience were more likely to experience depression. Conclusion: Stress, anxiety and depression are prevalent among RTs. Several sociodemographic factors are associated with the incidence of stress, anxiety and depression.

RT education and COVID-19 pneumonia discharge quality.

Background: There is a lack of data assessing the influence of respiratory therapist (RT) education on clinical outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of RTs holding advanced degrees or completing adult critical care competencies on discharge outcomes of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Study Design and Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included adults with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the hospital for at least three days between March-May 2020. The academic degree held by each RT was considered advanced (baccalaureate or higher) or associate degree. Discharge outcomes were considered good, compromised, or poor when subjects' hospital discharge was directly to home, long-term care facility/rehabilitation center, or hospice/died, respectively. A time-to-event multi-state regression model was used to determine the impact of RT academic degree and adult critical care competencies on discharge outcomes using α=0.05. Results: A total of 260 subjects (median age 59 y; 166 males) received clinical care from 132 RTs. RT median professional experience was six y (IQR 3-11), 70.8% had an advanced degree, and 70.8% completed adult critical care competencies. The time-to-event multi-state regression model showed that patients with >85% exposure to RTs with advanced degrees transitioned 3.72 times more frequently to good outcomes than RTs without advanced degrees (p=.001). Similarly, patients with >85% exposure to RTs with adult critical care competencies transitioned 5.10 times more frequently to good outcomes than RTs without adult critical care competencies (p<.001). Conclusion: Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who received greater than 85% of their care by RTs who earned advanced degrees or completed adult critical care competencies had improved discharge outcomes. This preliminary work suggests that advancing education for the respiratory therapist workforce may improve the discharge quality of patients with acute respiratory failure and should be further explored.

Characteristics, Identification, Training, and Perception of Leaders in Respiratory Care.

BACKGROUND: Leadership is critical to high-functioning teams; however, data are lacking for what defines successful respiratory therapist (RT) leadership. Leaders need a wide range of skills to be successful, although the exact characteristics, behaviors, and accomplishments of successful RT leaders are unknown. We performed a survey of respiratory care leaders to evaluate different aspects of RT leadership. METHODS: We developed a survey of RT leaders to examine respiratory care leadership in a variety of professional settings. Different aspects of leadership and the relationships between perceptions of leadership and well-being were assessed. Data analysis was descriptive. RESULTS: We received 124 responses, with a response rate of 37%. Respondents had a median 22 y of RT experience, and 69% were in leadership positions. The most-important skills identified for potential leaders were critical thinking (90%) and people skills (88%). Self-initiated projects (82%), intradepartmental education (71%), and precepting (63%) were noted accomplishments. Reasons for exclusion from leadership included poor work ethic (94%), dishonesty (92%), difficulty getting along with others (89%), unreliable (90%), and not being a team player (86%). Most respondents (77%) agreed American Association for Respiratory Care membership be a requirement for leadership; however, 31% required membership. Integrity (71%) was noted consistently as a characteristic of successful leaders. There was no consensus for behaviors of successful versus unsuccessful leaders or what defines successful leadership. Ninety-five percent of leaders had received some leadership training. Respondents reported that well-being is affected by leadership, departmental culture, peers, and leaders with burnout; 34% of respondents felt people with burnout received good support at their institution, whereas 61% felt maintaining well-being is left to individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Critical thinking and people skills were the most-important skills for potential leaders. Limited consensus existed on characteristics, behaviors, and defined success of leaders. Most respondents agreed leadership influences well-being.

Implementation of a Respiratory Therapist-Driven Protocol for Spirometry and Asthma Education in a Pediatric Out-Patient Primary Care Setting.

BACKGROUND: Best practice guidelines for asthma management recommend education and spirometry at specific intervals. A written asthma action plan with education and spirometry is ordered at the discretion of physicians at our institution. An initial chart review revealed that asthma education and spirometry were not consistently ordered in the pediatric primary care clinics. This quality improvement study aimed to increase frequency of spirometry and asthma education in children with asthma seen in pediatric primary care through use of a respiratory therapist (RT)-driven protocol. METHODS: The protocol established that spirometry and education would be done annually for children ≥ 6 y of age with intermittent asthma and every 6 months for persistent asthma. RTs identified eligible subjects and placed the electronic medical record orders before the clinic visit. Physicians were invited to complete a questionnaire before and after protocol implementation to assess barriers and protocol satisfaction. RESULTS: Nine hundred and thirty-two children were included. Prior to protocol implementation, spirometry and education were completed in 64.9% and 62.6% of eligible children, respectively. Following protocol implementation, spirometry and education were significantly increased to 92.7% (P < .001) and 88.5% (P < .001), respectively. Physicians identified interruption in clinic flow as the primary barrier for ordering spirometry and were satisfied with the protocol. Physicians stated that communication with RT improved through use of this protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an RT-driven protocol in an out-patient pediatric primary care setting significantly increased utilization of spirometry and education for children with asthma. RTs working in the pediatric out-patient primary care setting played a vital role in achieving best practices for asthma management. The implementation of the protocol enhanced interdisciplinary communication.

Barriers to Respiratory Care Research in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory therapists (RTs) are in a unique position to positively impact patient outcomes through respiratory care research. Research plays a key role in evidence-based medicine; however, few RTs perform and publish research. Identification of barriers experienced by RTs may help increase RT-driven research. Thus, we aimed to identify barriers and research interests for RTs. METHODS: American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) members were invited to anonymously complete a survey via an electronic link posted on AARC Connect. Survey domains included research training, experience, reasons for doing research, important respiratory topics, and barriers to conduct research. RESULTS: Responses from 82 surveys were analyzed. The majority were female (56%), and most had a graduate degree (61%), with a mean working experience of 25.3 ± 13.6 y. Fifty-seven percent of respondents reported at least one publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The desire to improve patient outcomes was the top-ranked reason for doing research. Most received research training through a graduate-level program (56%), but few had a formal research mentor (26%). Clinical research (67%) and quality improvement (63%) were the most common types of research. Data collection was the most common research role (51%). Invasive ventilation, advanced monitoring, and airway clearance were identified as the most important research topics. The primary barriers for RTs to conduct research were lack of protected time for research, opportunities to participate, training, departmental support, and mentorship. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of time, resources, and opportunities were identified as the primary barriers to RT research, and many RTs have not received formal research training. Resources such as formal mentorship, funding, and protected time may help increase RT participation in research.

New Graduate Respiratory Therapists' Perceptions of Their Transition to Practice.

BACKGROUND: The emerging challenges in the healthcare system require a vision for the future of respiratory care to ensure a successful transition to practice for new graduate respiratory therapists (RT). The nursing profession has recognized the need to acknowledge the successes and failures of graduates' transition to practice so that these programs can be continuously improved. The challenge is in identifying aspects of the transition to practice that may improve job satisfaction, retention, professional development, and patient care for RTs. This research aimed to explore the perceptions of new graduate RTs' experiences during their first year of practice and identify barriers and facilitators to a successful transition to practice. METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study surveyed new graduate RTs who transitioned to practice from May 2019 to December 2021 at a New England academic medical center respiratory care department. RESULTS: Twenty-eight new graduate RTs responses were included in the study. The majority of the respondents experienced a successful transition to practice; however, they faced many barriers. New graduate RTs reported that their orientation did not provide enough experience and exposure to gain confidence in critical skills and procedures. They also experienced stress due to COVID-19 and interpersonal relationships, felt overwhelmed by their workload, and were subject to negative workplace behavior. CONCLUSIONS: New graduate RTs experienced many barriers to their transition to practice. Respiratory care leadership should identify barriers faced by new graduate RTs during their transition to practice. A nurse residency model may provide a framework for RT transition-to-practice programs. Improving transition-to-practice programs for new graduate RTs and surveying their experiences may lead to an increase in job satisfaction, retention, and improved patient care.

Feasibility of a Multi-Center Respiratory Therapist Endotracheal Intubation Study.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory therapists (RTs) have historically performed safe and effective intubations, yet there are limited multi-center data assessing their intubation performance. Multi-center data can be used to compare RT intubation performance to that of other professions and identify quality improvement opportunities at hospitals where RTs perform intubation. We aimed to explore the feasibility of a multi-center collaborative to evaluate RT intubation outcomes. METHODS: A data collection tool was developed by the authors and implemented at two institutions. Following institutional review board approval at each center and completion of data-use sharing agreements, data were collected between May 25, 2020-April 30, 2022, and combined for analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to compare overall success rate, first-attempt success rate, adverse events (AEs), and type of laryngoscopy. RESULTS: There were a total of 689 intubation courses where RTs made an attempt, 363 from center A and 326 from center B. Center A captured 85% of all RT intubation courses, and center B captured 63%. Overall, RTs were successful in 98% of attempts. RTs made 86% of initial attempts. The most common indications for intubation were cardiac arrest (42%) and respiratory failure (31%). Videolaryngoscopy was used during 65% of initial attempts and was associated with higher first-attempt success rate, higher overall success rate, and fewer AEs. Airway-related adverse event rate was 8.7%; physiologic AE rate was 16%, and desaturation rate was 11%. CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative examining RTs intubation performance was successfully initiated at 2 separate facilities. Intubations performed by RTs had a high success rate, with AE rates comparable to published results from other types of providers.

Enhancing Respiratory Therapists' Well-Being: Battling Burnout in Respiratory Care.

Burnout is a major problem in health care and is associated with adverse sequelae for patients, health care workers, and organizations. Burnout among respiratory therapists (RTs) is as high as 79% and is associated with poor or ineffective leadership, inadequate staffing, high work load, non-leadership position, and work environment. An understanding of burnout is necessary for both staff and leadership to ensure RT well-being. This narrative review will discuss the psychology of burnout, prevalence, drivers, mitigation strategies, and future directions for research.

Current status of pediatric respiratory therapist / 中国小儿急救医学

Respiratory therapist is a new profession in medicine, who works therapeutically with people suffering from pulmonary disease.Their timely treatments of patients with cardiopulmonary insufficiency can significantly reduce mortality in pediatric intensive care units.This review focused on the responsibilities of respiratory therapists, the importance of respiratory support therapy in children, and the most updated development in China as well as the problems to be solved.

A cross-sectional survey on the lung ultrasound training and practice of respiratory therapists in mainland China.

PURPOSE: This national study aimed to investigate the lung ultrasound (LUS) training and practice of respiratory therapists (RTs) in mainland China. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicenter survey was conducted from May 22, 2021 to August 12, 2021, through online platforms. This survey included RTs in mainland China. The survey was divided into four sections: (1) demographic characteristics and basic information; (2) basic information about LUS training and practice; (3) LUS practice details; and (4) Other ultrasound training and practice. RESULTS: A total of 514 responses were received, and 494 valid responses were included in the analysis. 81.2% (401/494) participants' highest degree of education was a bachelor's degree, and 43.1% (213/494) participants were at level II in terms of job ranking. 99.2%(490/494) participants agreed that the RTs needed to learn lung ultrasound, but only 12.3% (61/494) participants had received a LUS training course. Further, 66.2% (327/494) experienced participants responded to Sect. 3. Most of RTs used LUS when the patient had hypoxia (265/327, 81%) or dyspnea (260/317, 79.5%); they also used it during spontaneous breathing trial(SBT) (191/327, 58.4%) or in prone position (177/327, 54.1%). The A-line (302/327, 92.4%), B-line (299/327, 91.4%), lung slide (263/327, 80.4%), and bat sign (259/327, 79.2%) were well known as LUS signs. Also, 30.6% (100/327) participants did not use the LUS protocol in their clinical practice, and only 25.4%(83/327) participants said they had used LUS scores. Moreover, 55.7% (182/327) participants frequently changed the respiratory therapy strategy according to LUS results. CONCLUSIONS: We should improve the number and workplace of RTs in mainland China in the future. We should also standardize the application of LUS practice and training for RTs in mainland China and establish corresponding certification pathways.

Burnout Among Respiratory Therapists Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Burnout is a major challenge in health care and is associated with poor overall well-being, increased medical errors, worse patient outcomes, and low job satisfaction. There is scant literature focused on the respiratory therapist's (RT) experience of burnout, and a thorough exploration of RTs' perception of factors associated with burnout has not been reported. The aim of this qualitative study was to understand the factors associated with burnout as experienced by RTs amid the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We performed a post hoc, qualitative analysis of free-text responses from a survey of burnout prevalence in RTs. RESULTS: There were 1,114 total and 220 free-text responses. Five overarching themes emerged from the analysis: staffing, workload, physical/emotional consequences, lack of effective leadership, and lack of respect. Respondents discussed feelings of anxiety, depression, and compassion fatigue as well as concerns that lack of adequate staffing, high workload assignments, and inadequate support from leadership contributed to feelings of burnout. Specific instances of higher patient acuity, surge in critically ill patients, rapidly evolving changes in treatment recommendations, and minimal training and preparation for an extended scope of practice were reported as stressors that led to burnout. Some respondents stated that they felt a lack of respect for both the RT profession and the contribution of RTs to patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Themes associated with burnout in RTs included staffing, workload, physical and emotional exhaustion, lack of effective leadership, and lack of respect. These results provide potential targets for interventions to combat burnout among RTs.

The Lived Experience of Respiratory Therapists During Withdrawal of Advanced Life-Sustaining Therapies at End of Life in the ICU.

BACKGROUND: The act of withdrawing advanced life-sustaining therapies, more specifically mechanical ventilation, is performed in hospitals all over the world. Success involves coordination of several members of the patient care team, including nurses, providers (physicians nurse practitioners, or physician assistants), and respiratory therapists (RTs). The experiences of RTs surrounding this procedure are not well documented. The aim of this study was to explore the lived experience of RTs who have participated in withdrawal of advanced life-sustaining therapies, utilizing a hermeneutical phenomenological approach. METHODS: Individual interviews were conducted with experienced RTs that were audio recorded and transcribed. The data were analyzed by 4 health professionals, and data were triangulated. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the study: (1) impact of power relations surrounding the process, (2) needing tools to provide quality withdrawal of advanced life-sustaining therapies, and (3) emotional involvement/exposure. It was clear from the analysis that RTs desire more education, to be part of the decision-making, and to be appreciated for their role in this emotional process. CONCLUSIONS: Through this study, the role of RT in withdrawal of advanced life-sustaining therapies is better understood, which can only lead to improvement in the overall process for health care team, patient, and families.

Safe and Effective Use of Score-Based Continuous Albuterol Therapy in a Pathway for Treatment of Pediatric Asthma Exacerbation.

BACKGROUND: Standardized acute asthma management with score-based, respiratory therapist (RT)-driven pathways and protocols improves outcomes including decreased length of stay (LOS) and time on continuous albuterol therapy. Limited data are available for the safety of continuous albuterol used outside of pediatric ICU (PICU). We use a modified pediatric asthma score (PAS) for the asthma pathway at our institution. The safety and effectiveness of using PAS to initiate/stop continuous albuterol as part of a score-based, RT-driven asthma pathway were evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective review of children ≥ 2 y admitted for asthma exacerbation to the PICU and step-down unit who received continuous albuterol as part of the asthma pathway during 2017-2019 was completed. Demographic and clinical data were extracted including PAS, dose and duration of continuous albuterol, LOS, and complications. Outcomes of subjects admitted to the PICU and step-down unit were compared. RESULTS: Results are expressed as median (interquartile range). The study included 412 children (61% male, 59.9% Black, 92.7% non-Hispanic, 44.9% moderate persistent asthma) with age and weight of 6.4 (4.0-10.0) y and 24.8 (17.3-39.5) kg, respectively. Most children were admitted to step-down unit (71.1%). Initial albuterol dose, duration, and LOS were 15 (10-20) mg/h, 9.1 (5.7-16.0) h, and 1.4 (0.9-2.3) d, respectively. Respiratory support was required by 29% of subjects. Need to restart therapy (2.9%), transfer to PICU (1.7%), and intubation (0.5%) were infrequent. No pneumothoraces or deaths were reported. Emergency department visits (3.9%) or readmissions (0.7%) within 30 d of discharge were low. Subjects admitted to the PICU were sicker and required more therapies and respiratory support than those admitted to the step-down unit. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an RT-driven, score-based pathway for initiation and discontinuation of continuous albuterol for treatment of pediatric asthma exacerbation was safe and effective in the PICU and step-down unit.

Burnout Among Respiratory Therapists in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Respiratory therapists (RTs) provide various types of patient care in different clinical settings. Burnout can have an undesirable effect on RTs and their patients. Managing the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically in hospitals, could induce stress in RTs and increase the likelihood of burnout. Therefore, this study aimed to measure the level of burnout among RTs during the COVID-19 pandemic.Method: A validated cross-sectional questionnaire was used to identify the prevalence and characteristics of burnout among RTs. The questionnaire was administered by the respiratory care department of a tertiary healthcare center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The data analysis included descriptive, inferential, and correlational tests.Results: The survey was distributed among 100 RTs with a response rate of 66%. Most respondents reported high burnout levels in the three domains of burnout: 77% reported emotional exhaustion, 98% reported depersonalization, and 73% reported low personal achievement. Univariate analysis revealed that emotional exhaustion was significantly higher among RTs who were male, married, or working in critical care settings. Female RTs and those working in general care settings reported feelings of reduced personal achievement. Furthermore, the analysis revealed a moderate positive correlation between the years of experience and emotional exhaustion (r=0.6, p<0.001).Conclusions: A high prevalence of burnout was observed among RTs in one Saudi tertiary hospital. Burnout is associated with several factors, and interventions should target all domains of burnout. RT management and staff are responsible for addressing their needs and collaboratively working together to overcome burnout. Further investigations focusing on techniques and strategies to alleviate burnout are required.

Factors Associated With a Positive View of Respiratory Care Leadership.

BACKGROUND: Burnout within health care is prevalent, and its effects are detrimental to patient outcomes, organizations, and individuals. Effects stemming from burnout include anxiety, depression, excessive alcohol and drug use, cardiovascular problems, time off work, and worse patient outcomes. Published data have suggested up to 50% of health care workers experience burnout and 79% of respiratory therapists (RTs) experience burnout. Leadership has been cited as a key driver of burnout among RTs. We aimed to identify factors associated with a positive or negative leadership perception. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of an institutional review board-approved survey to evaluate RT burnout, administered via REDCap by convenience sample to 26 health care centers (3,124 potential respondents) from January 17-March 15, 2021, was performed to identify factors associated with a positive view of leadership. Survey questions included validated tools to measure leadership, burnout, staffing, COVID-19 exposure, and demographics. Data analysis was descriptive, and logistic regression was performed to evaluate factors associated with leadership perception. RESULTS: Of 1,080 respondents, 710 (66%) had a positive view of leadership. Univariate analysis revealed those with a positive view of leadership were more likely to be working with adequate staffing, were rarely unable to complete all work, were less likely to be burned out, disagreed that people in this work environment were burned out, were less likely to miss work for any reason, more likely to be in a leadership position, worked fewer hours in intensive care, worked in a center affiliated with a medical school, worked day shift, were less likely to care for adult patients, and were more likely to be male. Logistic regression revealed providing care to patients with COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR] 5.8-10.5, P < .001-.006) was the only factor associated with a positive view of leadership, whereas working without adequate staffing (OR 0.27-0.28, P = .002-.006), staff RTs (OR 0.33, P < .001), work environment (OR 0.42, P = .003), missing work for any reason (OR 0.69, P = .003), and burnout score (OR 0.98, P < .001) were associated with a negative view of leadership. CONCLUSIONS: Most RTs had a positive view of their leadership. A negative leadership score was associated with higher burnout and missing work. This relationship requires further investigation to evaluate if changes in leadership practices can improve employee well-being and reduce burnout.

A Pre-Pandemic Evaluation of the State of Staffing and Future of the Respiratory Care Profession: Perceptions of Louisiana Respiratory Therapists.

BACKGROUND: Workforce development for the respiratory therapy (RT) profession is a growing concern. Upcoming staffing difficulties are expected due to retirement, attrition from the profession, and decreased enrollment in accredited RT programs nationwide. This study assessed respiratory therapists' perceptions of staffing needs and future trajectory of the RT profession. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized a modified 39-question survey tool delivered via e-mail to 618 Louisiana members of the American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) between November 2019-February 2020. RESULTS: The response rate was 19% (118/618). Although 50% of respondents perceived understaffing, 77.6% indicated the importance to remain in the RT profession. A majority (93.1%) agreed on the importance of maintaining an active membership in the AARC. Respondents working in a hospital setting perceived understaffed work environments more often than other groups. Salary was most important to the employee (33.6%, 39/116), followed equally by room for growth (14.7%, 17/116) and scope of practice (14.7%, 17/116). For the future of the profession, the ability to assess patients and develop care plans and the ability to receive reimbursement for services were indicated as most important factors. Most (69.8%) agreed that the entry-level minimum should be increased to the bachelor's degree, and 21.6% agreed the master's degree in RT should be supported to increase scope of practice. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated a consistent perception of understaffed work environments in respiratory care, and respondents expressed a perceived importance of remaining in the RT profession. This study also indicated support for raising the entry-level standard in RT and a desire for higher education to achieve professional growth and advancement.

Alveolar Ventilation-Targeted Versus Spontaneous/Timed Mode for Home Noninvasive Ventilation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Home noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is increasingly used in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to improve symptoms and survival. Our primary objective was to compare intelligent volume-assured pressure support (iVAPS) versus spontaneous/timed (S/T) modes regarding time to first change in ventilator parameters and the number of interventions over 6 months in subjects with ALS in a respiratory therapist (RT)-led program. METHODS: In this study, 30 subjects with ALS meeting criteria for NIV initiation were randomized to iVAPS or S/T. NIV was initiated using standardized protocols targeting optimal tidal volume and comfort in a daytime session. Download data were recorded at 1 week and 1 and 6 months. Any changes in ventilator parameters were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 30 subjects, 56.7% had bulbar onset ALS, 8 died, and 11 in each group completed the study. Median time to first parameter change was 33.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 7.7-96.0) d versus 41.0 (IQR 12.5-216.5) d for iVAPS versus S/T groups, respectively, (P = .48). The average number of RT interventions was similar between groups (1.1 ± 1.1 vs 0.9 ± 0.9 at 1 month, P = .72; 2.4 ± 2.1 vs 2.4 ± 2.3 at 6 months, P = .95, for iVAPS vs S/T, respectively). Adherence was significantly lower with iVAPS than S/T at 1 week but not at 1 or 6 months. Download parameters were similar between groups at 1 week and 6 months except for higher residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and less spontaneously triggered breaths with iVAPS at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The time to first change of parameters and the number of interventions at 6 months from NIV initiation were similar for the iVAPS and S/T modes in subjects with ALS. With iVAPS, adherence was lower transiently at NIV initiation, and the residual AHI was higher at 6 months. Alveolar ventilation-targeted NIV may require a longer adaptation period and result in greater upper-airway instability predominantly in patients with bulbar ALS.

Burnout among Respiratory Therapists and Perception of Leadership: A Cross Sectional Survey Over Eight Intensive Care Units.

BACKGROUND: Burnout syndrome (BOS) is a job-related stress disorder featured by three main cardinal manifestations: emotional exhaustion (EE), reduced personal accomplishment (PA), and depersonalization (DP). AIM: We aimed to report the prevalence of burnout and the impact of leadership and work condition on the burnout among respiratory therapists (RT) are front-line practitioners in many critical settings. METHODS: We surveyed RT in eight intensive care units (ICU) at five tertiary hospitals, under one medical corporation, using three instruments: the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel, Condition of Work Effectiveness Questionnaire (CWEQ), and Leadership behaviours scale. We used a group of other health care practitioners (ie, physicians and nurses) as the control group. RESULTS: Of a sampling frame of 1222 ICU practitioners, 445 (36.4%) responded with completed surveys. Eighty-four (17.3%) and 361 (82.7%) participants were in the RT and the control group, respectively. The overall burnout score was significantly lower in the RT group (53.6% vs. 67%, p = 0.02). The EE and DP scores were significantly lower in the RT group [(26.2% vs. 37.7, p = 0.048) and (9.5% vs. 19.9%, p = 0.025), respectively], but the PA score did not show significant difference between the groups. A significant negative relationship was found between CWEQ score and both EE and DP scores (rs = -0. 0.557, p < 0.001) and (rs = -0.372, p < 0.001), respectively, while a significant positive correlation was found between CWEQ and the PA score (rs = 0.225, p < 0.042). A significant negative relationship was found between the leadership attitude and EE scores (rs = -0.414, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest a high burnout rate among RT. The reported rate was significantly correlated to work conditions and leadership behaviours. Organizational efforts should be directed to combating burnout through the identification and adequate management of the key precipitating factors. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04620005.

The Rapid Implementation of Ad Hoc Tele-Critical Care Respiratory Therapy (eRT) Service in the Wake of the COVID-19 Surge.

A 24/7 telemedicine respiratory therapist (eRT) service was set up as part of the established University of Pennsylvania teleICU (PENN E-LERT®) service during the COVID-19 pandemic, serving five hospitals and 320 critical care beds to deliver effective remote care in lieu of a unit-based RT. The eRT interventions were components of an evidence-based care bundle and included ventilator liberation protocols, low tidal volume protocols, tube patency, and an extubation checklist. In addition, the proactive rounding of patients, including ventilator checks, was included. A standardized data collection sheet was used to facilitate the review of medical records, direct audio-visual inspection, or direct interactions with staff. In May 2020, a total of 1548 interventions took place, 93.86% of which were coded as "routine" based on established workflows, 4.71% as "urgent", 0.26% "emergent", and 1.17% were missing descriptors. Based on the number of coded interventions, we tracked the number of COVID-19 patients in the system. The average intervention took 6.1 ± 3.79 min. In 16% of all the interactions, no communication with the bedside team took place. The eRT connected with the in-house respiratory therapist (RT) in 66.6% of all the interventions, followed by house staff (9.8%), advanced practice providers (APP; 2.8%), and RN (2.6%). Most of the interaction took place over the telephone (88%), secure text message (16%), or audio-video telemedicine ICU platform (1.7%). A total of 5115 minutes were spent on tasks that a bedside clinician would have otherwise executed, reducing their exposure to COVID-19. The eRT service was instrumental in several emergent and urgent critical interventions. This study shows that an eRT service can support the bedside RT providers, effectively monitor best practice bundles, and carry out patient-ventilator assessments. It was effective in certain emergent situations and reduced the exposure of RTs to COVID-19. We plan to continue the service as part of an integrated RT service and hope to provide a framework for developing similar services in other facilities.